Tag: Writers Guild of America

  • WGA & Congressman Cardenas oppose Comcast-Time Warner Cable merger

    WGA & Congressman Cardenas oppose Comcast-Time Warner Cable merger

    MUMBAI: Congressman Tony Cardenas (CA-29) added his voice to the growing list of public officials, consumer groups and businesses that are opposed to allowing Comcast’s acquisition of Time Warner Cable. During a briefing held at the headquarters of the Writers Guild of America, West (WGAW) and attended by representatives of legislative offices from across the L.A. region, Cardenas officially stated his opposition to the deal.

     

    “Today I announce my strong opposition to the Comcast-Time Warner Cable merger. I ask the FCC, the DOJ, and the California Public Utilities Commission to deny this merger because it is bad for consumers, will harm competition, will lead to less diverse content, more expensive cable and internet access, and will eliminate good jobs in California. If approved, the Comcast-Time Warner Cable merger will drastically change the landscape for media and broadband internet service in America. The pending merger between Comcast and Time Warner Cable will enable an increased market dominance that will have a particularly negative impact on diversity of content and minority communities,” said Cardenas.

     

    “Mergers that increase the power of content gatekeepers do not serve the interests of consumers or creators. Comcast has already stated that if the merger is allowed it will save money by paying less for content. This means that programmers will have less money to invest in content, which means less creativity, less innovation and less product. This could translate into fewer jobs, including right here in Los Angeles. While approval of this deal once seemed an inevitable outcome, the issues raised here today and over the last year make clear that the appropriate action for state and federal regulators is to say no to the merger,” added WGAW president Chris Keyser.

     

    Presentations given by the WGAW, The Greenlining Institute, Entravision Communications Corporation, Sports Fans Coalition, and Presente.org detailed the far-reaching effects the merger will have on consumers, independent programmers and content creators, diverse communities, sports fans, and businesses throughout the Southland. New research conducted by the WGAW concludes that should the merger take place, Comcast’s increased buyer power as a distributor of television and the Internet will lead to higher prices for consumers, fewer content choices and less diverse and innovative content. Virtually no one in the L.A. region will be left untouched by this mega-merger.

     

    L.A. Consumers are almost certain to face higher prices for cable and Internet service, more restrictions on how they can access the content they want and worse customer service. Local consumers will have little choice but to accept this new reality because for 72 per cent of Los Angeles County residents living in Comcast’s proposed footprint, Comcast will be the only choice for high-speed broadband.

     

    Latinos across the country and here in Los Angeles will be harmed if this merger is approved. Comcast’s acquisition of Time Warner Cable would allow it to reach more than 90 per cent of Latino households nationally and become the dominant pay TV provider in LA, the largest Latino media market. Comcast will have make or break power over programmers trying to reach this audience. In addition, the company’s higher prices will hit local Latino consumers even harder, because with a median income of $21,314, compared with $44,929 for Anglo-Americans, they make significantly less than their white counterparts.

     

    Moreover, 78 per cent of African American residents and 73 per cent of Asian residents living in Comcast’s proposed LA County footprint will have no other choice for broadband service that offers speeds of 25 Mbps or faster.

     

    Local sports fans can expect higher prices or less access to home team games if the merger is approved. Already, 70 per cent of Angelenos do not have access to the local Dodgers channel because of Time Warner Cable’s anticompetitive pricing policies. The problem will only get worse if Comcast takes over Time Warner Cable and Charter systems locally because the bigger the cable provider gets, the more it charges competitors for access.

    The Creative Community will see Comcast increase its ability to pay less for programming and strangle the growth of online video, threatening the new “golden age of programming” we are currently living in.

     

    Independent and Diverse Programmers will face a larger, vertically integrated distributor that controls 30 per cent of the pay TV market and 50 per cent of the high-speed broadband market, giving it tremendous bargaining power over programmers. For Latino-oriented independent programmers, the situation is even worse because Comcast owns several Spanish-language networks and has both the incentive and ability to limit content competition.

  • Fox withdraws Time-Warner acquisition bid

    Fox withdraws Time-Warner acquisition bid

    BENGALURU:  Twenty-First Century Fox (Fox) withdrew its proposal to acquire Time Warner Inc.  Excerpts of the Fox press release – chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch commented: “We viewed a combination with Time Warner as a unique opportunity to bring together two great companies, each with celebrated content and brands.  Our proposal had significant strategic merit and compelling financial rationale and our approach had always been friendly.  However, Time Warner management and its Board refused to engage with us to explore an offer which was highly compelling. Additionally, the reaction in our share price since our proposal was made undervalues our stock and makes the transaction unattractive to Fox shareholders.  These factors, coupled with our commitment to be both disciplined in our approach to the combination and focused on delivering value for the Fox shareholders, has led us to withdraw our offer.”

     

    “21st Century Fox’s future has never been brighter.  The strength of our leading franchises, combined with the power of our emerging growth businesses and the leadership positions of our international enterprises put us on a path for even greater success.”

     

    The Board today authorised a USD 6 billion share repurchase programme. The repurchase of an additional USD 6 billion of Class A Common Stock is expected to be completed in the next 12 months. 

     

    Murdoch continued, “This significant return of capital underscores the Company’s ongoing commitment to disciplined capital allocation and returning value to shareholders in a meaningful way.”

     

    Time Warner responded with a press release. Excerpts of Time Warner’s statement regarding the announcement by Twenty-First Century Fox that it has withdrawn its proposal to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Time Warner.

     

    “Time Warner’s Board and management team are committed to enhancing long-term value and we look forward to continuing to deliver substantial and sustainable returns for all stockholders.  Time Warner is well positioned for success with our iconic assets, including the world’s leading premium television brand, the world’s strongest ad-supported cable network group, and the world’s largest film and television studio.  We thank our stockholders for their continued support. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. is acting as financial advisor to Time Warner. Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP is acting as legal advisor to Time Warner.”

  • Fox moves to garner funds; Fox or Time Warner, who will blink first?

    Fox moves to garner funds; Fox or Time Warner, who will blink first?

    BENGALURU: It was a deal, the possibility of which they had announced in May 2014. The media pundits said that it was inevitable, now that Rupert Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox (Fox) bid to buy out Time Warner had been rejected by the latter in mid-July 2014.  Fox needed to sweeten the offer with a higher bid and with the proceeds from the BSkyB deal, the company would not have to go in for a very big addition to its debt.

     

    Fox has gone ahead and done just that. Last week on Friday, Fox through a press release announced that it will transfer Sky Italia and its 57.4 per cent interest in Sky Deutschland to BSkyB to create a pan-European digital television leader through the combination of these assets.

     

    The release said further: ‘In exchange for the transfer, 21st Century Fox will receive approximately $ 9.3 billion in value from BSkyB comprised of approximately $ 8.6 billion in cash and BSkyB’s 21 per cent interest in National Geographic Channels International, raising 21st Century Fox’s ownership stake to 73 per cent. In addition, 21st Century Fox will participate in BSkyB’s announced equity offering by purchasing approximately $ 900 million of additional shares in BSkyB to maintain the Company’s 39.1 per cent ownership interest. The net, after-tax cash proceeds to be received by 21st Century Fox upon completion of all the elements of this transaction will approximate $ 7.2 billion. The agreement is subject to regulatory approvals, the approval of BSkyB stockholders and customary closing conditions.’

     

    Confirming the deal, in a message to his staff, Sky CEO Jeremy Darroch said, “The three companies complement each other well. We all operate businesses that look similar and offer similar products, and of course we share the same brand. But our affiliation goes deeper than that. We may work in different countries, but our corporate culture and values are familiar. Our teams know each other well and have a history of working together. So I am confident that this is a combination that will work well.” Darroch added, “We expect this process to take several months to complete.”

     

    So far Fox has chosen not to directly comment about the rejection of its bid or move by the Time Warner board that would stymie any action by 15 per cent or more of Time Warner’s shareholders that could favour bids by Fox and force Time Warner to consider being taken over. Fox has not commented on the Writers Guild of America, West (WGAW) speaking against any agglomeration of media companies and more specifically the WGAW’s opposition to Fox’s proposal for taking over Time Warner.

     

    However, in an oblique statement, the Fox release quotes its chairman and CEO, the 83 year old Rupert Murdoch as saying, “Our renewed authorisation for our share buyback program will be executed regardless of any potential acquisition or investment activity by the company. 21st Century Fox’s number one priority is increasing shareholder value in a disciplined manner and as a result, we will only consider transactions that fully support this objective.”

     

    Bloomberg reported on Saturday that Fox  is open to giving Time Warner shareholders seats on the board of the combined company should its $ 75 billion takeover bid succeed, attributing this to people familiar with the situation. Media reports suggest that the offer for board representation could appear in a revised proposal and that one of the reasons for Time Warner’s rejection of Fox’s overtures is that its shareholders are being offered non-voting shares by Fox.

     

    So it is more of a question of ‘when’ and not ‘if’ a fresh proposal is made by Fox. We should hear soon more about the Fox –Time Warner takeover/merger saga that will take two to three years to consummate, if it happens.

  • Are tech companies interested in Time Warner? Fox or Time Warner, who will blink first?

    Are tech companies interested in Time Warner? Fox or Time Warner, who will blink first?

    BENGALURU: Are tech companies really interested in Time Warner? Speculation is on about one of the biggies like Google, Amazon, Apple coming in as the knight in shining armour to thwart Fox’s unsolicited offer and taking over. Or maybe Verizon or Disney could step in, up the ante and carry away the bride? Is there really a knight in shining armour at all? Time will tell.

     

    While an acquisition like Time Warner would most certainly help Google get into Hollywood and help it create online platforms, Google is not in the content creation business and it could acquire other properties at a far lower price.

     

    Though Amazon has signed a multiyear agreement with Viacom for streaming children’s content and has had a successful video-on-demand partnership with CBS, it would be entering into completely new territory, were it to take over Time Warner. Amazon is already into competition with mobile handset players like Samsung and Apple with its Fire phone, does the company have the wherewithal (besides funds) and the bandwidth to take on more?

     

    For Apple’s iTunes and Apple TV, the merger would be great news, and acquisition of the huge content would be great, but Apple’s focus has been on devices, and not content. Will it be able to leverage the content to the extent to make it worthwhile spending that kind of money?

     

    As mentioned earlier, Time-Warner had rejected Rupert Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox (Fox) unsolicited offer allegedly worth about USD 76 billion cash and stock. 21st Century Fox had offered to buy Time Warner for USD 32.42 in cash and offered a ratio of 1.531 Fox class-A share for each Time Warner share. The Fox offer was worth about USD85-86 per share.

     

    In a defensive move, Time Warner has in the meantime initiated evasive action to thwart attacks on its soft underbelly by eliminating a provision in its bylaws that earlier could let just 15 per cent of its shareholders call special meeting, so as to prevent it being forced to consider the Fox offer in case Fox resorts to this measure to force the issue. The bylaws now say that the CEO or a majority of the board can call a special meeting.

     

    Joining the fray against the Fox Time Warner merger is the Writers Guild of America, West (WGAW), which says that such deals could harm writers.

  • Writer’s guild opposes media mergers: Fox Time Warner deal

    Writer’s guild opposes media mergers: Fox Time Warner deal

    BENGALURU: The chatter about moves, countermoves by both sides continues unabated around global media circles. Joining the fray against the Fox Time Warner merger is the Writers Guild of America, West(WGAW), which says that such deals could harm writers.

     

    As mentioned earlier, Time-Warner had rejected Rupert Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox (Fox) unsolicited offer allegedly worth about USD 76 billion cash and stock. 21st Century Fox had offered to buy Time Warner for USD 32.42 in cash and offered a ratio of 1.531 Fox class-A share for each Time Warner share. The Fox offer was worth about USD85-86 per share.

     

    Soliciting funds, the WGAW in an email sent to some of its members stated, “As writers, we face a landscape today that the founders of our guild would hardly recognize. For decades, there were dozens of significant buyers in television and movies. Then federal limits on mergers disappeared. FCC regulations requiring independent production in television were repealed.”

     

    “Now, those six conglomerates are threatening to swallow one another. “Think of that. Between them, Fox and Time-Warner would control 40 per cent of the industry’s writing jobs. What happens if more consolidation follows?  What happens if one mega-company ends up devouring them all?”

     

    “Giving to the Guild PAC is vital to your future,” the mail said. “The checks you write to your favourite Senate candidates cannot influence policy. But a powerful PAC, supporting candidates in the name of the WGA, gives us a fighting chance in the war against the corporate madness that threatens us all.”

     

    The mail added, “When our Guild speaks, Washington listens. But to make sure our voices are heard, we need power. Simply put, we need you. This, then, is our call to arms. In the industry as it exists today, writers no longer have the luxury of staying out of politics. Rather, more than ever, we need a voice in them.”

     

    Earlier, TV show runner and creator of the ‘Shield’ (2002-2008 for Fox Television Studios and Sony Pictures Television) and ‘Chicago Code’ (2011 for Fox Broadcasting Company) fame, Shawn Ryan had appeared before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, & Transportation to discuss the adverse effect of “weak net neutrality regulations” and media consolidation on the creative community.

     

    Before his appearance, Ryan had in a statement through the WGA said, “The reality of American media is that it is controlled by a handful of companies formed through two decades of consolidation .These companies own the television networks, the production studios and almost all of the scripted content that is available on television and in movie theatres. The cable companies that distribute this content are even more concentrated.”

     

    In February 2014, the WGAW had issued a statement opposing the friendly Comcast Time Warner Cable merger that is awaiting approvals. “Comcast’s proposed merger with Time Warner Cable is bad for everyone: content creators, programmers, suppliers, and consumers. As writers know all too well, media consolidation leads to already too powerful companies limiting competition. The WGA will fight to stop this ill-conceived merger.”

     

    Also, on June 24 this year, WGAW president Chris Keyser  testified against the proposed merger of AT&T and DirecTV. Chaired by U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), the subcommittee’s jurisdiction includes oversight of antitrust law and competition policy, with that day’s hearing focused on the AT&T – DirecTV merger and its impact on competition and consumers. “They will use their power to force content providers to accept below market rates for their product,” stated Keyser in his testimony. “It is a stated goal of the merger to reduce affiliate fees. The problem is: it is those fees that have fueled the recent boom in creative programming – particularly on cable. Reduce those fees through the outsized power of monopoly – and the result is less creativity, less product, less innovation.”