Tag: Trai

  • MIB flags issue of anti-national content on cable channels, seeks industry advisory

    NEW DELHI: Ministry of information and broadcasting (MIB) is seeking an advisory from the Indian media and entertainment industry on a number of issues, including ways to track and stop so-called anti-national content being aired on some local cable TV channels, which do not need to register with any government body.

    In a meeting held in MIB’s headquarters in the Capital’s Shastri Bhawan yesterday, senior officials put forth their concerns to the industry representatives and sought their help in resolving the issues, which have been flagged in various sections of the government, including the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) responsible for internal security.

    Government sources indicated that  the MHA has requested MIB to look into the issue of cable channels being run by some LCOs in states like Tamil Nadu, Jammu & Kashmir and Uttar Pradesh where `objectionable’ content  aimed at flaring sectarian passions were being telecast. Some such cable channels are also said to be illegally downloading unencrypted content from foreign TV channels for rebroadcast in various parts of India.

    As cable channels run by LCOs or MSOs or similar channels on a DTH platform as part of value-added services or VAS are not yet required to register with the government, officials find it difficult to zero down on cable channels especially. As LCOs are required to register with the local post offices, a common database of such Indian LCOs is also not there for effective tracking, as admitted by a government official, who hastily added that work on creating a LCO database is underway.

    As part of its many set of recommendations to streamline the carriage part of the cable and broadcast business, regulator TRAI had suggested  that the government tweak relevant regulations to specify that all cable channels run by LCOs too would have to get government license like satellite or cable-delivered  TV channels. However, because of effective lobbying by LCO organizations, MIB is yet to act on the regulator’s suggestions on cable channels.

    Government sources indicated that more such meetings may be held with industry reps to understand and find solutions to issues linked to country’s national interest.

    ALSO READ:

     

    Peace TV saga & absence of rule of law

     

    Indian govt warns against re-transmission of Peace TV illegally

  • Govt rules out TV channel categorisation (updated)

    NEW DELHI: The government has ruled out categorisation of TV channels, fixing telecast time and framing code of conduct for contents of various serials and other telecast, the Parliament has been told.

    Minister of state for information and broadcasting Rajyavardhan Rathore said the programmes and advertisements telecast on private TV channels are required to be in conformity with the Programme and Advertising Codes prescribed in the Rule 6 and 7 of the Cable Television Networks Rules 1994.

    Rule 7(11) of the said rule provides that “No programme shall carry advertisements exceeding 12 minutes per hour, which may include up to 10 minutes per hour of commercial advertisements and up to two minutes per hour of a channel’s self-promotional programmes.”

    Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court is to hear on 11 October the case challenging the ad cap on television channels.

    In the hearing on 29 March 2016, a plea was made on behalf of the information and broadcasting ministry that a proposal was being contemplated to amend the relevant provision relating to limiting ads to 12 minutes an hour. The petition has been filed against the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and the Union Government by the News Broadcasters Association (NBA) and other stakeholders.

    The court has already directed that the order that TRAI would not take any action against any channel pending the petition would continue. In an earlier hearing, the court had, at the regulator’s instance, directed that all channels keep a record of the advertisements run by them.

    The NBA had challenged the ad cap rule, contending that TRAI does not have jurisdiction to regulate commercial airtime on television channels. Apart from the NBA, the petitions have been filed by Sarthak Entertainment, Pioneer Channel Factory, E24 Glamorous, Sun TV Network, TV Vision, B4U Broadband, 9X Media, Kalaignar, Celebrities Management, Eanadu Television and Raj Television.

    Also read:   

    TV adcaps case in Delhi HC deferred to 20 April

    127 channels violating 12 min/hr ad-cap rule, TRAI releases details

    Copyright owners call for competitive pricing over TRAI regulation

     

  • Dish TV partly adopts ‘game changer’ tariff order of TRAI

    MUMBAI: It’s seeking to make a point. Even as the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s (TRAI’s) TV tariff order is going through the motions in Indian courts, the Essel group-owned Dish TV India has announced that it is going to toe – if at least partly – its line.

    It has announced a new initiative called ‘Mera Apna Pack’ under which subscribers can opt for standard definition channels at an a la carte rate of just Rs 8.50 each in addition to their basic service pack that they have subscribed. For high definition channels, the sticker price has been pegged at Rs 17 per channel. Dish TV has on its platform more than 615 channels and services including 30 audio channels and over 67 HD channels and services.

    Says Dish TV India group CEO Anil Dua: “We are delighted to enable them to exercise the freedom of choice in viewing their favorite television content. This initiative will truly empower consumers to choose from the bouquet of channels and pay for only those channels that they would like to watch. This will also be in tune with TRAI’s new tariff regulations, an attempt to make channel pricing flexible yet affordable.”

  • TRAI seeks conclusive views on ease of doing broadcast biz

    NEW DELHI: Noting that a business-friendly environment is a pre-requisite for the growth of a nation and makes a country a favorite business destination particularly with the fast changing regulatory framework for the media and entertainment sector,the Telecom Regulatory Authority has issued a consultation paper on the ease of doing business in broadcasting based on views received by it on a pre-consultation paper issued on 19 April this year.

    Responses to the paper, which poses around 18 questions to stakeholders, have to be sent by 28 August with counter-comments if any by 11 September 2017.

    Noting that the M and E sector in India is one of the fastest growing sectors, TRAI has noted that It not only leads to employment generation but also helps in the growth and development of an economy.

    The economic liberalisation measures initiated in the early 1990s had focused on reduction of regulatory burden on enterprises as an underlying objective of the reform process. The Government has launched an ambitious programme of regulatory reforms aimed at making it easier to do business in India. The programme aims to pinpoint the bottlenecks and ease them to create a more business-friendly environment. The efforts have yielded some results with India ranked at 130 according to the World Banks’ Doing Business report. But, there is still huge scope for further improvements.

    TRAI notes that the IMF has branded India as the brightest spot in the Global Economy. Several Global Institutions have projected India as the leading destination for FDI in the World and a number of recent global reports and assessments, show that India has considerably improved its policies, practices and economic profile. It is expected that enabling policies and determination to continue with economic reforms, various initiatives taken by the Government such as Make in India, Smart City Mission, Skill India Mission, Digital India, etc. would further spur the growth of the economy.

    The pre-consultation paper on the ease of doing business in broadcasting which covered all media came just a few months after a similar paper on telecom. In the new era of convergence, the two sectors are expected to complement each other.

    The aim is also to remove entry barriers by laying down well defined and transparent procedures and processes thereby creating level playing field and competition in the sector and to facilitate innovation and technology adoption for providing better quality of services to the consumers to steer further growth of the sector by attracting investment through investor friendly policies

    Subjects to be covered are related to processes and procedures for obtaining permission/license/registration for the following broadcasting services and subsequent compliance connected with these
    permissions.

    The fields include:

    (a)Uplinking of TV channels
    (b) Downlinking of TV channels
    (c) Teleport services
    (d) Direct-to-home services
    (e) Private FM services
    (f) Headend-in-the sky services
    (g) Local Cable Operators
    (h) Multi System Operators
    (i) Community Radio Stations

    The questions raised are:

    1. Is there a need for simplification of policy framework to boost growth of satellite TV industry? If yes, what changes do you suggest in present policy framework relating to satellite TV channels and why?
    2.  Is there a need in present policy framework relating to seeking permission for making changes in the name, logo, language, format, etc. related to an operational satellite TV channel? If so, what changes do you suggest and why?  Is there a need for simplification of policy framework to boost growth of satellite TV industry? If yes, what changes do you suggest in present policy framework relating to satellite TV channels and why?
    3. Do you agree witb some of the stakeholders comments at the pre-consultation stage that Annual Renewal Process of TV channels needs simplification?
    4. Do you agree with stakeholders’ comments that coordination with multiple agencies/ Government departments related to starting and operating of a TV channel can be simplified? If so, what should be the mechanism and framework for such single window system?
    5. Is present framework of seeking permission for temporary uplinking of live coverage of events of national importance including sports events is complicated and restrictive? If yes, what changes do you suggest and why?
    6. Do you feel the need to simplify policy framework for seeking permission/license for starting and running of following services:  
    (iii) Teleport services
    (iv) DTH service
    7. As per your understanding, why open sky policy for Ku band has not been adopted when it is permitted for ‘C’ band? What changes do you suggest to simplify hiring of Ku band transponders for provision of DTH/HITS services?
    8. What are the operational issues and bottlenecks in the current policy framework related to:
    (iii) Teleport services
    (iv) DTH service
    How these issues can be simplified and expedited?  
    9. What are the specific issues affecting ease of doing business in cable TV sector? What modifications are required to be made in the extant framework to address these issues?
    10. Is there a need to increase validity of LCO registration from one year? In your view, what should be the validity of LCO registration?  
    11. What are the issues in the extant policy guidelines that are affecting the ease of doing business in FM sector? What changes and modifications are required to address these issues?
    12. Is there a need to streamline the process of assignment of frequency by WPC and clearances from NOCC to enhance ease of doing business? What changes do you suggest and why?
    13. What are the reasons for delay for allocation of frequencies by WPC? What changes do you suggest to streamline the process?
    14. What are the key issues affecting the indigenous manufacturing of various broadcasting equipment and systems. How these issues can be addressed?
    15. Is there any other issue which will be relevant to ease of doing business in broadcasting sector? .
    16. Are there any issues in conducting trial projects to assess suitability of a new technology in broadcasting sector?  
    17. What should the policy framework and process for consideration and approval of such trial projects?

    ALSO READ :

    Ease of doing b’cast biz date extended to 19 May

    TRAI seeks ideas on ease of doing b’cast business

    New portal to help ease of broadcast business

     

  • TRAI issues directions to prevent TSPs from blocking spectrum

    NEW DELHI: Taking note of the huge wastage due to blocked spectrum causing inconvenience to consumers, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India has directed that a Unified Access Service (UAS) licensee must surrender such spectrum immediately upon closure of wireless access services if he decides to close down its wireless access services which were being provided through the administratively assigned spectrum.

    In its directions issued today related to closure of access services, TRAI says a UAS licensee should be permitted to discontinue any of the services, permitted under the scope of licence without the need to surrender the licence.

    In case of closure of access services through any technology in the entire service area or a part of it, the TSP should be mandated to give a 60 days notice to the licensor and TRAI and 30 days notice to its effected subscribers, clearly stating the options available to the subscribers, including that of Mobile Number Portability (MNP) facility.

    The Authority has recommended various time-lines to be followed by Department of Telecom/WPC and the Licensee in the spectrum trading process. These timelines will bring greater clarity and certainty in the entire process of spectrum trading. If the entire spectrum in all bands is being sold by a licensee and will result in discontinuation of services, recommended timelines will remove uncertainties and facilitate the TSPs to given 60 days notice to DoT/TRAI and 30 days notice to its subscribers.

    If a subscriber wants to switch from one technology to other, within the same TSP, the same should not come under the definition MNP.  

    At the outset, TRAI has said that due to adoption of market based spectrum management, the continuance of access service is now no longer assured. Recently, there have been cases where due to reasons such as licensee failing to re-acquire its spectrum holding in a band on expiry of its license validity period; change of technology deployed by licensee; sale of entire spectrum holding through spectrum trading; roaming arrangement coming to an end; etc., there has been closure of access services being provided by the licensee. As a result subscribers had to face lot of inconveniences.

    The directions are aimed at ensuring that subscribers are not put to undue hardships due to closure of access services.

    The Authority had suo-motu issued a Consultation Paper on “Issues related to closure of Access Services” on 30 November 2016 seeking the comments of the stakeholders and an Open House Discussion was held on 28 April 2017 at New Delhi.

    Also Read:

    Broadband connectivity in gram panchayats to be completed by Mar ’19

    Star India-TRAI jurisdiction case to come up in Madras HC today

    TRAI tariff: AIDCF impleads in Tata Sky, Airtel Digital pleas 

  • Orders reserved by Madras HC on TRAI jurisdiction case

    Orders reserved by Madras HC on TRAI jurisdiction case

    NEW DELHI: The Madras High Court today reserved orders on the Star India-Vijay TV challenge to the jurisdiction of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India to issue tariff orders.

    The court received a compliance report from its registry that all parties had filed their written submissions.

    Earlier last week, the Authority had said it would file its written submissions only after scrutinizing those of the broadcasters, after which the broadcasters had been directed to serve their submissions to TRAI the same day (27 July) .

    Thus submissions have been filed by the petitioners Star India and Vijay TV, respondent TRAI, and intervenors All India Digital Cable Federation (AIDCF) and Videocon d2h.

    Arguments on the hearing which commenced late last month had concluded on 19 July and all parties had been asked to file written submissions.

    Star India and Vijay TV’s challenge to the jurisdiction of TRAI to issue tariff orders is on the ground that content comes under the Copyright Act.

    In the hearing on 19 July 2017, the Court had refused to accept an affidavit by the Indian Broadcasting Foundation  (IBF).

    Although the Supreme Court had in early May while staying the tariff order directed the Madras High Court to complete hearing within four weeks, the High Court had commenced hearing only in the last week of June.

    Meanwhile, TRAI TV reference interconnect offer (RIO) and Quality of service order (QoS) came into effect from 2 May following the order of the High Court. (However, the Tariff order comes into effect only from 2 September 2017.)

    Apart from the Tariff order which had originally been issued on 10 October last year, the regulator also issued the DAS Interconnect Regulations which had been issued on 14 October last year, and the Standards of Quality of Service and Consumer Protection (Digital Addressable Systems) Regulations which had been issued on 10 October last year.

    The orders can be seen at:

    http://trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/Tariff_Order_English_3%20March_2017.pdf
    http://www.trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/QOS_Regulation_03_03_2017.pdf
    http://www.trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/Interconnection_Regulation_03_mar_2917.pdf 

    Also Read:

    Decks cleared for TRAI tariff order implementation as HC declines stay (updated)

    TRAI jurisdiction case listed for 31 July to peruse compliance report

  • Star India-TRAI jurisdiction case to come up in Madras HC today

    Star India-TRAI jurisdiction case to come up in Madras HC today

    NEW DELHI: The Star India-Vijay TV case challenging the jurisdiction of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India is scheduled to come up for hearing in the Madras High Court today after TRAI was to file its written submission after scrutinising those of the broadcasters.

    Counsel for both the broadcasters had objected to the statement by the TRAI counsel P Wilson refusing to file and serve written submissions. After hearing all sides, the bench had directed the broadcasters to serve their submissions by 5 pm on 27 July to TRAI and the interveners All India Digital Cable Federation and Videocon d2h.

    It asked TRAI to serve its submissions on the other parties the next day — 28 July. Thereafter, the court was on Monday scheduled to take note of the compliance of submission of the written statements from the court registry. Meanwhile, both interveners filed their submissions in Court.

    Arguments had concluded in the matter on 19 July and the matter had been posted for today for filing of written submissions. Star India and Vijay TV’s challenge to the jurisdiction of TRAI to issue tariff orders is on the ground that content comes under the Copyright Act.

    In the hearing on 19 July 2017, the Court had refused to accept an affidavit by the Indian Broadcasting Foundation. Although the Supreme Court had in early May while staying the tariff order directed the Madras High Court to complete hearing within four weeks, the High Court had commenced hearing only in the last week of June.

    ALSO READ :

    TRAI tariff: AIDCF impleads in Tata Sky, Airtel Digital pleas

    Madras HC to hear Star India’s rejoinder in TRAI challenge today

    TRAI can only regulate transmission, not broadcast material: Star tells Mds HC

    Hearing to end next week in Madras HC on Star India challenge to TRAI Tariff order

  • Broadband connectivity in gram panchayats to be completed by Mar ’19

    NEW DELHI: Broadband connectivity will be provided under Phase-II of the BharatNet project to remaining 1,50.000 gram panchayats in the country using an optimal mix of underground fibre, fibre over power lines, radio and satellite media.

    Communications minister Manoj Sinha said in the Parliament that this phase is targeted to be completed by March 2019.  

    Sinha said, according to information provided by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), there were 422.19 million broadband subscribers and the internet penetration (internet subscriber per 100 population) was 32.86% in the country as on 31 March 2017.

    The National Telecom Policy-2012 envisages 600 million broadband connections by the year 2020, he said. 

    He said the Government had planned the BharatNet project to provide 100 Mbps broadband connectivity to all Gram Panchayats – approximately 2,20,000 in the country.

    Under the first phase of the project, 100,000 Gram Panchayats are to be connected by laying underground Optical Fibre Cable (OFC) which is under implementation. 

    The Minister said that the provision of last mile access to the network and broadband service provisioning shall be through Wi-Fi or any other broadband access technologies in all 2,50,000 GPs in the country.

    As on 23 July 2017, the status of implementation of BharatNet is:  

    No. of GPs where OFC laying is completed: 100,299 GPs 

    Optical Fibre Cable laid: 221,925 Kms 

    Broadband Connectivity provided in GPs: 25,426 GPs 

    Also Read:

    Broadband subs growth slows further, wireline broadband loses subs

    Broadband: Futuristic policy to deal with communication & entertainment challenges

    Wireless b’band data speed ideas date extended

    Broadband speed: TRAI extends ideas date to 20 July

  • Telangana govt. wishes to own satellite to air TV channels

    NEW DELHI: Now, an Indian state wants to own a satellite and broadcast TV channels espousing Indian values. The Telangana government would like to have its own satellite in orbit to telecast (TV) channels with good content, state IT minister K T Rama Rao said in Hyderabad on Wednesday.

    Speaking after the launch of T-SAT network of two television channels (Vidya and Nipuna) of the state government, which telecast content on distance learning, agriculture extension, rural development, tele-medicine and e-governance, the minister, as quoted by a PTI report from Hyderabad, said, “Today, we are broadcasting two channels by using satellite technology. But, eventually the goal is…not today… we should have our own special satellite in the orbit.” 

    The state government can telecast good content by having some channels at a time when the negative impact of western culture is being seen in the society, he said as per the news agency report.

    public://Telangana-Map-Home-Page.png

    “Through that satellite, if necessary, not two, but the state government would work actively (on) some 10 to 12 channels. Today, we see the developments in society. We see the impact of western culture. We can do many types of programmes on behalf of the government,” Rao said, recalling that India’s space agency ISRO had recently launched a record 104 satellites in a single mission.

    Educational content used to be telecast under the brand name of ‘Mana TV’ in undivided Andhra Pradesh, but the state government sought to expand its programming, Rao said, adding that the newly launched channels aim to offer content in different areas, including health and agriculture, for the benefit of the masses, the minister added.

    Such assertions once again highlight why TRAI’s suggestions on media ownership and barring government and government-backed bodies from getting into business of broadcasting and cable TV distribution should be adopted at the earliest by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. Or else, soon every state in India may want to `own’ satellites, TV channels and then get into distribution, thus creating potential local monopolies, an industry observer opined.

    Sector regulator TRAI’s exhaustive set of recommendations on media ownership, issued and updated from time to time and last made in 2014, can be found here http://www.trai.gov.in/release-publication/recommendation.

    ALSO READ:

    TRAI releases recommendations on media ownership

  • Comment: Reliance Industries’ telecom-media play fascinating, but complex & challenging too

    “This breakthrough and revolutionary device named JioPhone, along with Jio’s disruptive tariff, will unleash the power of Digital Life in the hands of 1.3 billion citizens of the largest democracy in the world,” Mukesh Ambani told  a gathering of about 2,000 at Reliance Industries’ 40th AGM in Mumbai last week even as thousands round the world followed his announcements online, “Jio will be the greatest accelerator of the Bharat-India connectivity. Indians even in the remotest villages will now have the same access to digital entertainment, digital learning, e- healthcare, e-banking, e-governance and real-time information that are enjoyed by those in cities like Mumbai or Delhi.”

    India and the domestic stock markets gasped as Ambani, head of one of world’s largest petrochem companies in the world unveiled sops like practically cost-free handsets (Jio Phone), free voice calls and limited-yet-very-attractive data plan for Jio phone subscribers. Setting the cat amongst the pigeons, he also announced that the 4G LTE Jio Phone handsets could be hooked to a TV set to watch streaming videos on a larger screen — an Apple TV-like or Chromecast-like devise, as the experts described it.

    The announcements — disruptive, as Ambani admitted himself  — had an immediate effect on 21 July 2017: share prices of other telcos and some market-listed DTH and MSO companies tumbled on the stock market. If people at some traditional media houses are to be believed, strategists started scouring excel sheets to examine where and how their bottomlines could get affected and what could be a flanking strategy, if at all that was needed.

    The $30 billion fourth-generation mobile network Jio, launched in September 2016, already has 100 million paying customers. The target is 500 million of those Indians who use low-end feature phones. The Jio Phone is to be available to the masses from September (beta testing starts August 2017) for free on a three-year refundable deposit of Rs. 1,500. Under the `Dhana Dhan’ plan of  Rs. 153 per month, subscribers can get unlimited data with conditions. As there will be a “fair usage policy of half a GB per day to ensure that bandwidth is fairly apportioned for every user”, as Ambani said, the `unlimited’ data may not be as free flowing as being envisaged.

    But if Jio is targeting the 500 million feature phone users in India, mostly in non-urban areas,  even Rs. 153 per month could be a bit daunting. So, there would be sachet packs of Rs. 54/week and a two-day plan for Rs. 24 that provide similar value. Jio is targeting 5 million handsets to be available every week and from last quarter of 2017 they’d be manufactured in India under Make In India programme of the present government. Talk about killing birds with a stone!

    If Ambani called the Jio project a disruptive one, he was actually telling the truth. The question is: how disruptive and what’s the trigger?

    “The answer in one word: data. The refining and petrochemicals group is changing its stripes with an audacious and expensive bet on data, which Mukesh Ambani says is `the new oil’,” a Bloomberg analyst wrote in a newspaper, adding, “Assuming half of the country’s 500 million feature-phone users switch (to Jio phones), Jio collects $6 billion interest-free for three years.”

    One would say a brilliant strategy to lock in the refundable amount for the phone and gain additional cash for expansion; not that Reliance is falling short immediately on funds.

    Now, the questions arise. Will Jio Cable TV devise impact the business of DTH and satellite TV operators’ bottomlines? Should companies like Tata Sky, Dish TV/Videocon D2h, Airtel Digital and Sun Direct be worried? Can Jio Cable TV replace the low-cost cable services provided by the likes of Siti Network, Hathway-GTPL, DEN Network, SCV, Fastway, Ortel, InCable, Nxt Digital, etc? If it’s looking to replace the present TV services — delivered via satellite, cable and telecom infrastructure (OTT) — from where will it get varied programming? Will it tie up for content with non-Reliance Industries controlled broadcasters like Star, Zee, Sony Pictures, Discovery, HBO, etc? Will the broadcasters ultimately end up paying the Jio platform for carriage of their content or Jio pay for outside content?  Or, is Jio another experiment at triple play from a company that’s sitting on piles of cash because its petrochem business is booming? 
    There are no clear answers at the moment to such posers.

    A Bank of America Merrill Lynch advisory on 21 July 2017 while analyzing and lauding some aspects of the Jio announcements (smaller telco names losing their “value proposition” of lower priced voice offering, is one such observation) pointed out, “We do not see today’s announcement as being negative for Dish (one of India’s largest DTH operator from the Zee group now in the process of merging another operator Videocon D2h with itself), as the announced plan caps the TV viewing to 3-4 hours per day, which will prevent users to switch to Jio Phone TV. However, we do see long term DTH ARPU growth coming under pressure from the offer and related developments.”
    This brings us to the question of content on various Jio networks. Remember, the company has been testing its MSO services and has dropped hints about a DTH service too whose nature of delivery is not yet clear.

    At the moment, RIL controls 53 television channels and several digital media properties, all of them housed across Network18 and joint venture Viacom18. Apart from these, RIL’s media arms are also the “partner of choice in India” (Ambani’s words) for leading global brands such as CNBC, CNN and Forbes magazine.
    The combined Network18 channels on an average reach over 500 million viewers every week, Ambani claimed, adding with digitization of the media business and expansion of mobile broadband and fixed broadband connectivity, driven by Jio, the media and entertainment part of RIL’s business empire has “exponential growth potential in the future”.

    While RIL was preparing to announce its revolutionary Jio phone and bundled services at mind-numbing price points, it had already stitched up a deal with one of India’s biggest and best content producers, Balaji Telefilms Ltd.(BTL), for a stake that was a shade under 25 per cent at a cost of Rs. 4133 million. BTL said that the proceeds from the transaction would be used to up content development, especially for ALT Balaji (the OTT platform).

    Balaji had already integrated the ALT app with JioMoney, the mobile wallet from Reliance Payment Solutions, earlier this year to provide digital transaction experience to its subscribers. RIL’s stake in Balaji may force the content producer to change its content strategy to tailor it more to Reliance’s needs. Similar strategic stakes in some other content producing companies cannot be ruled out in future as also taking control of a financially-beleaguered broadcasting company having a few on-air TV channels.

    So, 53 up and running TV channels of various hues and in several Indian languages, combined with Balaji’s content generating prowess, does give RIL access to quite a big content library to push on its Jio Phone platform. Even if for limited viewing on cheap data packs.

    Pointing out that Reliance Jio capex will reduce drastically going forward, a former asset manager at a Mumbai brokerage firm opined that RIL already has 100 million+ paying Jio subs, it has access to the technology, content and capital and, more importantly, got management bandwidth, which all combine to become a heady cocktail for any successful telecoms-media company — a la Comcast or Netflix or a media behemoth that has the potential of ruling the waves.

    But a behemoth is also more prone to questions from regulatory regimes; especially in a country like India where prevalence of multiple languages make the job of a regulator to define monopoly that much more difficult.

    And, that brings us to our last important issue that Reliance Jio phone and allied services raise: monopoly and potential discrimination. Since Jio is bundling several apps and services, critics observe, it’s already started to build a `paid-for walled garden’. Will such a `garden’ be against Net Neutrality — an issue that’s being presently studied by Indian telecoms and broadcast regulator TRAI? An arrangement between Facebook and Anil Ambani-controlled Reliance Telecommunications forinternet.org or free Internet was struck down by TRAI in 2015 giving a major setback to the social media giant.

    Questions, questions and more questions. So, we’d leave it here presently with straws in the wind. But the head of an MSO company, on condition of anonymity, aptly summed up the Reliance’s telecom-media play: “The threat has arrived, though these are early days to say as to who will get hurt.”
      
    ALSO READ:

    Jio to raise Rs 200 bn for next phase of expansion

    Mukesh Ambani offers JioPhone from 15 Aug

    Reliance Jio to launch Android powered 4K STBs