Tag: Trai

  • What now for TV ratings and TAM

    What now for TV ratings and TAM

    MUMBAI: When the cabinet committee on economic affairs announced that it had approved the Telecom Regulatory of India (TRAI) recommendations on TV ratings guidelines in the first week of  2014 the first question that struck everyone was – what will TAM do now?

     

    The fracas between angry broadcasters and TAM has been brewing for  several years and finally came to its boiling point last year when seven TV networks announced that they were clicking on the TAM TV rating unsubscribe button. This put a big question mark over TAM’s very existence but it managed to get out of the corner it was in by hammering out a solution which was acceptable to most subscribers. 

     

    As far as the current threat to TAM’s continuance is concerned, the Cabinet’s go ahead to the proposed regulatory framework has now to be notified. When that will happen no one knows, though speculation is that it could be sooner than later. However, what is sure is that TAM will have 30 days from notification date to comply with its guidelines and then seek a licence from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB).  From all angles it looks like a pressure cooker-like situation that the TV ratings provider has landed itself in. 

     

    Broadcasters seem to be the happiest of the lot. NDTV group CEO Vikram Chandra – whose company sued TAM in a New York court two years ago – is cock-a-hoop with delight that the government has affirmed what industry has been voicing since nearly six to seven years: that TAM and the ratings process in India needs to be spruced up.

     

    “The introduction of firm guidelines is a positive step as everything is clear now. It shows that we should never be hesitant to change something that isn’t right,” says Chandra.

     

    Whether TAM will manage to find the capital to ramp up its peoplemeter sample to 20,000 within a month or two is something that is concerning industry. What is also a big question mark is how the MIB will view the WPP group’s 50 per cent equity in TAM (through Kantar Media Research 20 per cent, and Cavendish Square Holdings 30 per cent), as mentioned in the NDTV suit with the supreme court in New York.

     

    “Kantar and Cavendish will have to exit since their parent is WPP. TAM has been worrisome and everyone has realised it. So now it has just two options, either shape up or ship out,” says a senior news broadcaster from the News Broadcasters Association (NBA).

     

    However, a source from the IBF presents another option. “We are a democratic country so the government cannot force things on anybody. TAM has the freedom to go to the court and appeal against the guidelines,” says the source.

     

     If TAM decides to oppose the guidelines and go to court and gets a stay order, then we might see some delays in the roll out of the guidelines. This will allow it to continue to operate until a final decision is given by the court, thus buying it some time. Additionally, the industry-backed Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) will also get some time to get its act together with the minimum 20,000 meters.

     

    Media agencies and advertisers aren’t too happy with the way the cabinet has thrust the deadline on TAM.

     

    Says a senior media professional:  “In the beginning of cable and satellite TV in India in the nineties, we had TAM and INTAM. The latter could not sustain itself and TAM continued. Then we had TAM and aMap in the mid of the previous decade. aMap too found the going tough without full industry support and folded up. The fact is TAM has started from scratch and survived so many upheavals. It is a sad situation to be destroying something that has been existing and running for so long. ”

     

    However, she is clutching on to a thin sliver of hope that TAM and BARC could co-exist for a while until things smooth out on the ratings front. 

     

    “The time given to follow and make all the changes as per the guidelines is impractical,” says Madison World chairman & MD Sam Balsara. “It is obvious that TAM will not be able to handle it all at such a short notice.”

     

    The Indian Society of Advertisers (ISA) chairman Hemant Bakshi says that he is discussing the consequences of the cabinet’s clearance to the new ratings guidelines with major advertisers and other players to gauge the possible impact on their businesses.

     

    One scenario that everyone is dreading is that TAM fails to comply with all the requirements within the time period it is given, and the courts dismiss its appeal, if it makes one. Will it then be forced to cease operations immediately and lead to a ratings-less period for the Indian television business? This is extremely alarming for all concerned.

     

    IPG Mediabrands CEO Shashi Sinha who is also in the technical committee of BARC feels that the management of the new proposed ratings system needs to pull their socks up, and accelerate the rollout of people meters. But even then he says that “we are hoping to be on our feet and start functioning only by September/October.”

     

    That seems a long, long time away, going by how things are moving. Madison’s Balsara is quite clear on the way forward. Says he: “As an industry we need ratings, all the time! Therefore, till BARC comes up, we need an alternate. As an industry we should appeal to the ministry to relax the deadline for the implementation.”

     

    Hence, it is imperative for all concerned – whether it is the MIB led by Manish Tewari, the government, TAM, the ISA, advertising agencies, broadcasters and BARC – to choose their next steps wisely.

     

  • Cabinet gives go-ahead to TV ratings regulatory mechanism

    Cabinet gives go-ahead to TV ratings regulatory mechanism

    NEW DELHI:  The Union Cabinet today gave the go-ahead to the television ratings guidelines ,which had earlier been proposed by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) in September 2013, cleared by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) in November. The ministry had then forwarded the proposed guidelines for the cabinet’s approval. With the cabinet’s clearance the MIB will now have regulatory control over TV ratings agencies in India.

     

    This was disclosed by MIB minister Manish Tewari after the cabinet meeting.

     

    The guidelines cover detailed procedures for registration of ratings agencies, eligibility norms, terms and conditions of registration, cross holding restrictions, methodology of audience measurement, a complaint redressal mechanism, sales and use of ratings, audit, disclosure norms, reporting requirements and action on non-compliance of guidelines etc.

     

    The guidelines state that TV ratings providers – including TAM Media which is the industry standard currently – will have to first get registered with the MIB. The registration will be given to them only if they comply with the rules the TV ratings guidelines have enumerated. Among these figure:

     

    * No single company / legal entity either directly or through its associates or interconnect undertakings shall have substantial equity holding that is, 10 percent or more of paid up equity in both rating agencies and broadcasters/advertisers/advertising agencies. 

     

    * The ratings agency should have a net worth of at least Rs 20 crore.

     

    * Panel homes for audience measurement shall be drawn from the pool of households selected through an establishment survey. A minimum panel size of 20,000 is to be implemented within six months of the guidelines coming into force. Thereafter the panel size shall be increased by 10,000 every year until it reaches 50,000. 

     

    * Ratings ought to be technology neutral and shall capture data across multiple viewing platforms viz. cable TV, Direct-to- Home (DTH), Terrestrial TV etc. 

     

    * Secrecy and privacy of the panel homes must be maintained. 25 percent of panel homes shall be rotated every year. 

     

     * The rating agency shall submit the detailed methodology to the Government and also publish it on its website. 

     

    * The rating agency shall set up an effective complaint redressal system with a toll free number. 

     

    * The rating agency shall set up an internal audit mechanism to get its entire methodology/processes audited internally on quarterly basis and through an independent auditor annually. All audit reports to be put on the website of the rating agency. Government and TRAI reserve the right to audit the systems /procedures/mechanisms of the rating agency. 

     

    * Non-compliance of guidelines on cross-holding, methodology, secrecy, privacy, audit, public disclosure and reporting requirements shall lead to forfeiture of two bank guarantees worth Rs 1 crore furnished by the company in the first instance, and, in the second instance shall lead to cancellation of registration. For violation of other provisions of the guidelines, the action shall be forfeiture of bank guarantee of Rs. 25 lakh for the first instance of non-compliance, forfeiture of bank guarantee of Rs 75 lakh for the second instance of non-compliance and for the third instance, cancellation of registration. 

     

    * A time of 30  days would be given to the existing rating agency to comply with the guidelines. 

     

    * The guidelines would come into effect immediately from the date of notification. 

     

    The Guidelines for Television Rating Agencies in India are designed to address aberrations in the existing television rating system. These guidelines are aimed at making television ratings transparent, credible and accountable. The agencies operating in this field have to comply with directions relating to public disclosure, third party audit of their mechanisms and transparency in the methodologies adopted. This would help make rating agencies accountable to stakeholders such as the Government, broadcasters, advertisers, advertising agencies and above all the people. 

     

    Television Rating Points (TRPs) have been a much debated issue in India since the present system of TRPs has reportedly not found favour with industry, consumer groups, broadcasters, agencies, government who have said they are riddled with several maladies such as small sample size which is not representative, lack of transparency, lack of reliability and credibility of data etc.

     

    In 2008, the MIB had sought recommendations of TRAI on various issues relating to TRPs and policy guidelines to be adopted for rating agencies. TRAI, in its recommendations in August 2008, had amongst other things recommended the approach of self-regulation through the establishment of an industry-led body, that is the Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC). 

     

    The MIB had constituted a Committee under the Chairmanship of Dr. Amit Mitra, the then Secretary General FICCI, in 2010 to review the existing TRP system In India. The committee also recommended that self-regulation of TRPs by the industry was the best way forward. 

     

    Since, the BARC could not operationalise the TRP generating mechanism, the  sought recommendations of TRAI in September 2013 on comprehensive guidelines/accreditation mechanism for television rating agencies in India to ensure fair competition, better standards and quality of services by television rating agencies. TRAI recommendations on Guideline for Television Rating Agencies were received in September 2013. While supporting self-regulation of television ratings through an industry-led body like BARC, TRAI recommended that television rating agencies shall be regulated through a framework in the form of guidelines to be notified by MIB. It also recommended that all rating agencies, including the existing rating agency, shall require registration with MIB in accordance with the terms and conditions prescribed under the guidelines. 

     

  • TV ratings issue listed for cabinet discussion on 9 Jan

    TV ratings issue listed for cabinet discussion on 9 Jan

    MUMBAI: The year 2013 saw quite a ruckus being raised about the ratings process being followed in the country. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) in September 2013 came out with a recommendation paper after receiving suggestions from stakeholders on its consultation paper regarding the same.

     

    The paper got the ministry of information and broadcasting’s (MIB) nod in mid-November. Now it has been listed for consideration and approval by the cabinet committee on economic affairs on 9 January.

     

    Complaints about TV ratings in India have been aired for several years now. However, the TRAI released its recommendations only late last year on the way forward. In its paper it gave several suggestions to improve the quality of the ratings, one suggestion was that ratings agencies should register themselves with the MIB  and no one from its board of directors  should be involved in the business of broadcasting or advertising. They will have to give Rs 10 lakh as registration fee and produce a bank guarantee of Rs 1 crore.

     

    The minimum number of houses was recommended to be doubled to 20,000, to be increased by 10,000 till it reaches 50,000. 25 per cent of the viewership panel being monitored should be rotated every year. 

     

    If the ratings agencies failed to follow the guidelines they would be penalised, the severest being cancellation of the registration. 

     

    If the new ratings guidelines do get the cabinet’s nod, it means that the existing ratings agency TAM Media will have to invest anywhere between Rs 200-250 crore to scale up its panel and get itself registered with the MIB. The Broadcast Audience Research Council – which currently has the full backing of the broadcast, advertising and marketing industries and is racing to start its services by mid-2014 – will also have to follow the same course of MIB registration.

  • “Subscribers stick to us because of our services and choice of packs”

    “Subscribers stick to us because of our services and choice of packs”

    When you first meet him, what strikes you most about him is his candour. Indeed, Tata Sky managing director & CEO Harit Nagpal has got a reputation of speaking his mind. He was not afraid to come out in the media and make an appeal to ISRO when it delayed delivering him his transponders on GSAT-10 which would have allowed him to ramp up the offerings the Tata group, News Corp and Temasek joint venture could deliver to its customers. When the appeal got no response, he did not let it dampen him. Instead he chose to upgrade Tata Sky’s set top boxes from MPEG-2 to MPEG-4 at no cost to them.

     

    He was also quite open at the Indian Digital Operators Summit organised by Indiantelevision.com and Media Partners Asia when he invited his rivals and other players from the cable TV ecosystem to come in and study the best practices that Tata Sky has put in place. “The time has come for all of us to collaborate and grow the digital ecosystem,” he had said. “And my doors are open to anyone who wants to see how we do what we do.”

     

    That offer still stands, says Nagpal, who believes that Tata Sky has some processes which compare with the finest practices globally. Especially its single-minded focus on the customer and the experiences it provides them. Nagpal strongly believes in delighting the customer and his supplier-partners as well. “In this way, we will all grow together,” he says.

    Nagpal presides over the DTH Operators Association of India and has a CV which explains his dervish like focus on the consumer. A chemical engineering graduate with an MBA from FMS, Delhi, he has nearly 28 years of work experience with stints at Shoppers Stop, Pepsi, Marico and Lakme in various leadership positions in fields like Sales, Exports, Operations and Marketing. Before joining Tata Sky in August 2010 he was the group marketing director of Vodafone plc, working out of London.

     

    In a conversation with indiantelevision.com’s Seema Singh and Vishaka Chakrapani, Nagpal talks about the efforts which are needed to keep Tata Sky’s 11 million subscribers happy, the company’s decade-long journey and how it’s dealing with the national digitisation rollout.

     

    Excerpts:

     

    How was the year 2013 for Tata Sky and for the DTH industry? What will year 2014 bring for Tata Sky and the industry?

    2013 was what we had been waiting for years. It was strange that in a country like India where everything is regulated, there was one full unregulated industry that required government intervention. People developed cold feet when the process of digitisation began but after the first round took place both the industry and government were confident that it has to be and can be done.

     

    DTH gained hugely in the process. We don’t create a new customer; instead, we convert an analogue customer to DTH. Very rarely we have fresh customers coming to DTH. On a steady basis, this industry picks approximately three million customers every year. Also, every year DTH converts around four per cent of the 100 million cable TV viewers into DTH homes. In the cities that got digitised in 2013, DTH gained nearly 30-35 per cent of cable converts.

     

    So while we were converting around four per cent cable TV customers into DTH subscribers per year, with digitisation, we have moved it up to 35 per cent in a month. Now did we gain or lose, it’s for you to decide. The biggest advantage of DTH is that consumers can choose their pack and pay for it.

     

    At Tata Sky, we’ve had a very good year, in terms of total turnover, profits, growth rate, churn, average revenue per user (ARPU) etc. In every aspect, we are leading.

     

    The new year will have newer services and technology being introduced.

     

     

    What differentiates Tata Sky from other DTH players?

     

     

    There’s hardly any scope for differentiation here. With content being common and everyone having access to similar technology, there is no exclusivity. The only differentiation is through the service we offer. Stakeholders are judged on: a) how they manage customers without causing much trouble for them and (b) how they help customers recover as soon as possible, in case of any issue. 

    I have always believed that there is room for innovation. We started with standard definition (SD), high definition (HD), DVR, video on demand (VOD), ‘Catch up TV’ and now have moved to ‘Everywhere TV’. We believe in introducing one service every year. The service initially starts with being accepted by leading edge customers, which then percolates to others.

    How do you decide on the new services? Also, how do you ensure that it is accepted by the consumer?

    Customers tell us what they are seeking. We just have to go back to them and seek their pain points and then find solutions for that. We don’t start with technology and find customers. We try to seek their needs and then tailor services.

    The television sets in Indian homes are getting better, and so we have to ensure that we match the screens at home. Giving digital signals to cable TV homes was the first step, the second was HD. Even for this transformation, it was the customer that gave us the cue, since they were looking for better quality. 

    The recorder was introduced when we saw that people were expected to be in front of the TV when the show was being broadcast, it was becoming impossible for them to plan their day around the show. The answer to this was the recorder.

    When we saw it was causing inconvenience for customers to physically get a DVD from market and watch it, we launched VOD and followed it up with ‘Do it yourself’ films.

    Catch up TV came in response to customers wanting to watch something that had already been aired. Our latest addition was ‘Everywhere TV’. We found out that more and more people were spending time outside and were consuming videos on mobile screens. So we thought of connecting Tata Sky to the handsets. Through this, a decent broadband or 3G connection could help people consume content through ‘Everywhere TV.’

    How much a does a consumer pay for subscribing to ‘Everywhere TV’? How do you divide the revenue share? Do you think people would want to subscribe to ‘Everywhere TV’?

    If a consumer can buy a Rs 50,000 phone, he would not mind paying Rs 60 per month for ‘Everywhere TV’. The Rs 60 is divided equally among all stakeholders. So while one-third goes as taxes, the broadcasters take one third and we keep the rest. So, we would make around Rs 20 for the infrastructure we’ve invested.

    The need on which the product is based tells me it will do well. The first launch is restricted to iOS, but we will be launching soon on Android as well. We are happy with the numbers we got in the first three weeks of the launch of the service.

    Everyone is consuming videos today. And with the video consumption going up, prices are coming down. Even mobile phone operators want people to consume videos on phone. Everywhere TV is one way of increasing consumption and as networks start getting filled it is possible for mobile operators to drop prices. Our job is to create the product and make it affordable.

    How are the multiple services helping the company?

    The services are helping us increase the ARPUs without any price rise. When you are penetrating deeper into a market, your next customer is bound to give you less. The only way you can increase it is by making him consume more of what he wants to and make him pay for it.

    By offering more services and choice of packs, we have been able to ensure that our subscribers stick to us. The fact that we have growing ARPUs, we must be doing something right, by launching multiple services. 

    Have you been able to fulfill the need for more capacity with MPEG4 boxes? By when will the seeding of the MPEG4 boxes be complete?

    MPEG4 boxes have ensured that there is no real content shortage now. We started seeding MPEG 4 boxes this year and with that we have been able to fill the gaps. We had to leave Kerala and Tamil Nadu, because of capacity constraint. With the MPEG4 boxes, we have been able to go back to Kerala with 19 channels.

    It will take close to two years for us to complete the whole replacement process. We have 12 transponders and with these MPEG4 boxes, we are fine in the short to medium term.

    Recently the aggregator IndiaCast had a face-off with Dish TV over ‘on-request channels’. How does Tata Sky manage the relationships with the stakeholders involved?

    We have great relations with our content providers. We have long and protracted negotiations with them. However, that rarely leads to a breakdown of relations and we reach a reasonable and reasoned out number to renew our contracts. If we make more money we would like to share it with the partners.

    2014 may see disappearance of aggregators? Do you think it will affect the DTH players?

    No, it will not. I have been hearing news on these lines, but it doesn’t affect us much. If it comes into force, instead of negotiating with one player, we will have to negotiate with several players. But that is easy. These negotiations do not happen every day, these are contracts signed for three to four years.

     

    Apprehension is that if all this will result in cost hike. But I don’t see any cost issue. In fact, with aggregation we are forced to buy certain channels, which our customers don’t want. If TRAI decides to remove the role of aggregators then I may not take all the channels. I can save that bandwidth for products that my customer wants. Currently, what is happening is more and more bandwidth is getting clogged because of the channels that broadcasters wants to push and not what customers want to watch.

    In the long run, it is all about what the customer wants.

     

    Are the DTH players pinching customers from each other?

    At this stage there are no such plans. With 70 per cent still being analogue cable TV homes, we have enough scope from the analogue cable TV homes. We can tap that.

    Do you think India is still far away from US standards? Can we think of a time when DTH will totally replace cable TV? 

    I think we are already there. Any technology launched in the US is also available here. There are some services that are slightly better there but that’s dependent on quality of broadband. The day that gets better, the service experience will get better. There are infrastructural constraints that keep us from providing certain services that are present in the US. But, one has to start somewhere.

    Cable is getting digitised and so it’ll be there in the industry. I don’t think India will be an only DTH country. The industry improves only when more operators try to do new things. Life starts with fragmentation and moves to consolidation. I don’t think there’ll be consolidation in this business. Yes, the number of subscribers moving from cable to DTH is larger than reverse. But that doesn’t mean the cable will disappear.

    How has the response of interior towns been to DTH penetration?

    More than 60 per cent of our new customers are not from the top 20 cities. Once a service reaches them, they respond more positively than a person in the city. Most places we are going today are places with the presence of cable. There is certainly a kind of saturation we are reaching in top cities. Not like we are not getting numbers but there are certain limitations.

     

    More customers are available in the interiors. A good amount of growth is coming from basic services in interiors and high end in top cities. A customer, who came to us seven years ago, picked up our innovations each year. We are hopeful that someone in the interiors will also get onto our recording facility in a few years.

    To what extent has packaging been explored in India? How do you package channels for your consumers? Is it easy for consumers to add or remove channels from their pack?

    There was a time we were creating packs that customer didn’t even understand. In India, people don’t watch metals (bronze, silver, gold packs), they watch genres. Hindi news and Hindi soaps is something that everyone watches. What we do is that we put these in the base pack and then top it with a bit of music and other genres. We, then give two language channels because in most homes two languages are spoken apart from Hindi and English. Customers have a choice of adding other genres like English movies, kids, music, knowledge, etc on top of the base pack.

    We have services by which if a person who is not getting a channel he needs, can just SMS it to us and instantly the channel will be switched on. It’s instantaneous. Customers take a pack and then add on a la carte. So they take a base pack and then add channels to it. That’s where our revenues are growing. Our ARPUs are growing because we are making it easy for our consumers to buy more content.

  • TRAI Consultation Paper on 800 MHz Spectrum wants stakeholders’ opinion on pricing

    TRAI Consultation Paper on 800 MHz Spectrum wants stakeholders’ opinion on pricing

    NEW DELHI: The Telecom Regulatory Authority (TRAI) of India has asked stakeholders for their views on whether the value of 800 MHz spectrum should be derived on the basis of the value of 1800 MHz spectrum using technical efficiency factors.

     

    It has also sought to know the block size in the 800 MHz band and what should be the quantum of spectrum in the 800 MHz band that should be put up for auction.

    It has also asked if there is any case for application of a lower efficiency factor (1.3) over the valuation of 1800 MHz spectrum, for determining the valuation of 800 MHz, as was done in the previous auction and give detailed reasons for the same.

     

    The stakeholders have been asked if the value to be paid for 800 MHz spectrum should be based upon the potential growth in data services.

     

    The questions have been asked in a Consultation Paper by TRAI on the Reserve Price of the Spectrum for 800 MHz in response to a query in this regard by the Department of Telecommunications on 12 December.

     

    Written Comments on the Consultation Paper are invited from the stakeholders by 15 January and counter-comments by 22 January. As the issue has to be decided urgently, no extension will be granted. Comments and counter-comments will be posted on TRAI’s website www.trai.gov.in.

     

    Open House Discussion (OHD) on this consultation paper will be held on 27 January, 2014 in New Delhi. This may be treated as an advance notice for the OHD.

     

    Other questions include whether the value of spectrum in the 800 MHz band should be assessed on the basis of producer surplus on account of additional spectrum and reasons and calculations for the views given.

     

    TRAI also wants to know if the value of spectrum in the LSAs in India for 800 MHz should be determined by utilising the data on international prices or what other variables can be suggested for arriving at robust value estimates using the multiple regression approach.

     

    Apart from the approaches discussed in the paper, TRAI wants to know if there are any alternate approaches for valuation of spectrum in 800 MHz that you would suggest.

     

    It has also sought opinion on the ratio adopted between the reserve price for the auction and the valuation of the spectrum.

  • MSOs to meet in Kolkata on gross billing

    MSOs to meet in Kolkata on gross billing

    KOLKATA: Kolkata based multi-system operators (MSOs) mean business and how? Well! The fact that they have not been able to start gross billing in the city on the time as directed by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI, they have decided to meet on 3 January and discuss the smooth rollout of gross billing in the KMA area.

    “Since the local cable operators affiliated with us are not ready to distribute the bills thinking that this might make them delivery boys, we have called up the meeting to discuss on the matter and come up with ways to ensure that gross billing begins in Kolkata,” said a MSO.

    Some last mile operators (LMOs) have decided to not allow gross billing in Kolkata DAS I area, said another MSO. “The billing system will bring transparency and organise the business but some operators are opposing it,” he said.

    “We were prepared for a long time with the bills slated to be put up on the system. Since some MSO’s were not ready we had to wait,” said Siticable Kolkata director Suresh Sethia.

    Sources on the condition of anonymity questioned that while a few MSOs like DEN Networks and Digicable among others have not yet started the package, how can they start the billing process?

    While another source questioned how MSOs who have achieved around 70-80 per cent CAF submit compliance report for gross billing?

    When the Cable Operators Digitalisation Committee of the Association of Cable Operators convener Swapan Chowdhury, was contacted, he said: “The government is putting pressure on the MSOs to start gross billing so that it can collect tax easily. No one is concerned about the operators.”

    “We will not allow gross billing to start till all the issues like licensing conditions, unworkable revenue share model and agreement with the MSOs are resolved,” concluded a LCO.

  • MSOs meet; decide to start gross billing in Mumbai soon

    MSOs meet; decide to start gross billing in Mumbai soon

    MUMBAI: The national multi-system operators (MSOs) don’t want any more delay in starting the gross billing in the phase I cities. While gross billing has already begun in Delhi and Kolkata, the MSOs who have been facing resistance from the last mile operators (LMOs) in Maharashtra, met today in Mumbai to decide on the means to implement billing in the city.

    The four MSOs: Hathway Cable & Datacom, DEN Networks, IMCL and SitiCable have unanimously decided to authorise the LMOs to bill their consumers. “The LMO wants ownership of their consumers, and we have decided to give them that,” informs a MSO present during the meeting.

    The MSOs during the meeting decided that they will generate the bill and hand it over to the LMOs, who can further give it to the subscribers. “We will start the process in the next couple of days. Consumers will receive the bill for the month of December,” he adds.

    While the decision on who collects the entertainment tax is still pending with the Bombay High Court, the MSOs have decided to go ahead and complete the process of gross billing in Mumbai and submit the compliance report to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), the deadline for which was 31 December. “We will submit the compliance report, once the billing process starts,” says the MSO.

    But what happens if the consumer pays the bill through a cheque? “Well! It is up to the subscriber, they can either sign the cheque in the name of the MSO or the LMO. But considering that the entertainment tax needs to be paid by the LMOs, it will be preferable that the subscriber signs it in the name of the LMO. The LMO will pay us the collection after deducting his revenue share,” he informs.

    The decision has been taking to brings everything on track. “The decision on entertainment tax will come sooner or later. But, that cannot deter us from getting the process rolling,” says the operator.

    At the meeting, the revenue share for the pay and free channels was also discussed. “These are commercial discussions. We have almost reached on an agreement for that as well. And our plan of revenue share is better than the one suggested by the TRAI,” says the MSO.

    But, are the LMOs completely convinced as well? “We will be meeting Hathway and IMCL on 4 January to discuss the fine points. Our concern is that the ownership of consumer should be with the LMOs. We will discuss with them the billing format and also get clarity on whose name the bill is being generated. The heading of the bill should have the name of the LMO and not the MSO. We will not allow that,” says Maharashtra Cable Operators Federation (MCOF) president Arvind Prabhoo.

    However, the MSOs have suggested that the bills generated from the MSO will have the name of the LMO, while that generated from the LMO to the subscriber will have the name of the subscriber. “This is a welcome move. But, we still need to discuss the finer points tomorrow,” adds Prabhoo.

    In the meeting to be held between MCOF and the MSOs on Saturday, finer points like additional cost of bill printing, distribution and collection will also be discussed. “These are additional liabilities of DAS in the absence of the interconnect agreement and also unfair revenue share and hence need to be discussed,” concludes Prabhoo.

  • National MSOs to meet in Mumbai on gross billing issue

    National MSOs to meet in Mumbai on gross billing issue

    MUMBAI: The national multi-system operators (MSOs) are meeting on 3 January in Mumbai to discuss the smooth rollout of gross billing in Maharashtra. While the deadline set by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to achieve 100 per cent customer application forms (CAFs) for phase II cities and submitting compliance report for gross billing for phase I cities came to an end on 31 December 2013, the MSOs have been unable to start gross billing in Maharashtra. The meeting has been called to discuss on the matter and come up with ways to ensure that gross billing begins in the state.

    “Since the issue of entertainment tax, which is supposed to be included in the bills generated to the consumer, is in the Bombay High Court, we cannot start gross billing in the state. We will be meeting on Friday to discuss issues at hand,” informs a MSO who will be attending the meeting.

     The MSOs are claiming to have achieved 90-95 per cent CAF and also submitted the compliance report for Delhi and Kolkata to TRAI. “But, the situation is a little different in Maharashtra,” admits the MSO.

    While no independent MSO will be a part of the meeting, the national players operating in Maharashtra: Hathway Cable & Datacom, DEN Networks, SitiCable and InCable will meet tomorrow.

    But, the last mile operators (LMOs) have decided to not allow gross billing in Maharashtra. “The case is anyways in the Bombay High Court and so the MSOs cannot start gross billing in the state. Though Hathway has verbally agreed to give partial access to its subscriber management system (SMS) to the LMOs and said that while it will bill the LMOs, the latter can bill the subscriber, thus being the owner of its subscriber, there has been no response from DEN and IMCL on the same,” informs Maharashtra Cable Operators Federation (MCOF) president Arvind Prabhoo.

    “We will not allow gross billing to start in Maharashtra till all the issues are resolved,” adds Prabhoo.

  • TRAI releases its 2013 report card

    TRAI releases its 2013 report card

    MUMBAI: The year 2013 saw the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) cracking its whip on the broadcasters as well as every other party within the industry for its betterment. It released several papers and regulations in order to do so. The Regulator that released its activity report for the year gone by as the New Year kicked off, said that consumer interest has been one of its main mandates.

    To ensure good consumer experience, in 2013, TRAI amended ‘standards of quality of service (duration of ads in TVs)” of 2004. And what came into effect was the regulation that restricts advertising air time to 12 minutes for a clock hour. The regulator says that this practice is not uncommon in several countries and also goes along with the provisions of the Cable TV Network Rules (1994). “Excessive advertisement adversely affects the quality of viewing experience of the consumer. The objective behind the issue of these regulations was to ensure a better quality of experience for the consumer,” says the TRAI’s activity paper.

    But even after this amendment, not all the broadcasters have been following it and the current fate of the ad cap is in a limbo. Several broadcasters have even challenged it in the Delhi High Court including the News Broadcasters Association (NBA). When channels openly did not follow the rule, TRAI started prosecuting them for it. Complaints were filed against 14 broadcasters for non compliance with the regulation. With this, TRAI disappointed many channels as the regulation came at a time when advertising rates were dipping and digitisation had not even entered phase II.

    TRAI also came up with The Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Tariff Orders for cable TV and DTH services that provides standard tariff packs for supply and installation of STBs to consumers in DAS areas and Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) to DTH consumers.

    When India’s oldest DTH operator, Dish TV went to the regulator for extension of its 10 year licence that was to expire on 30 September, it woke up to the fact there were no guidelines/rules on  extension. The new consultation paper is reportedly coming out this month and meanwhile Dish TV has been allowed to continue on its existing terms and conditions.

    The issue of media ownership was also addressed with the Regulator coming out with a consultation paper that discussed points related to ownership of a media outlet, disqualification from the media sector and rules for mergers and acquisitions in the sector. Media monopoly issues were also taken up when the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) asked TRAI to examine whether there was a requirement of restrictions on MSOs and LCOs to prevent them from monopolising cable TV markets.

    The TAM brouhaha that saw adamant broadcasters unsubscribe to its ratings system led to the TRAI coming up with its guidelines defining parameters for ratings agencies and ratings systems.

    Major steps were taken to strengthen the process of digitsation. Multi-system Operators (MSOs) and Local Cable Operators (LCOs) were ordered to bring a proper subscriber management system (SMS) in place and disconnect signals for those whose details were not entered.

    Pay TV channels were asked to have written interconnect agreements with MSOs. One of the provisions that protected broadcasters was that an MSO could not demand signals for a particular channel under the ‘must provide’ clause and ask for carriage fee.

    As India is progressing towards digitisation, a la carte channels should also be available along with packages, so that subscribers can opt for either a la carte or bouquets or a combination of both. 14 LCOs and a MSO were also taken to court for not following DAS regulations.

  • Financial books of some Kolkata MSOs should be audited: Analysts

    Financial books of some Kolkata MSOs should be audited: Analysts

    KOLKATA: At a time when some multi-system operators (MSOs) in Kolkata are stuck in a legal battle with the government authorities over non-payment of taxes, city-based analysts feel that the financial books of some MSOs should be duly audited.

    “Some MSOs should be audited by the authorities as non-payment of taxes is causing loss to the state as well as central exchequer,” says a cable TV analyst Mrinal Chatterjee.

    Last year, in August 2013, Kolkata-based MSO Kolkata Cable & Broadband Pariseva Ltd (KCBPL) managing director Bijoy Kumar Agarwal was arrested for evading service tax payment to the tune of Rs 5.52 crore. Agarwal was arrested during a raid conducted by the service tax officials probing the alleged financial irregularities of the MSO.

    Says a local cable operator (LCO), “All these years, it was the LCOs who were held responsible for all the deeds and misdeeds. Now digitisation has helped in unfolding the truth that even the MSOs are resorting to unfair means to do their business. The government authorities must look into the matter seriously.”

    Trouble for operators in Kolkata seems to be intensifying. Before it was the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and now they are being closely monitored by the tax inspectors, police authorities and even the judiciary.