Tag: Times now

  • News channels spend highest time on crime stories

    News channels spend highest time on crime stories

    MUMBAI:Crime, law and order stories rule the roost on news channels. At least for the period 14 September to 24 October 2008 when news channels dedicated 29 per cent of their coverage time on such kind of content, according to News Content Track (NCT), a monitoring service recently launched by Tam.

    The study conducted by Tam covers Hindi channels Aaj Tak and Star News and English channels Times Now and NDTV 24X7.

    During the period, news channels have spent 513.22 hours of programming on crime, law and order stories. Next in the rung is sports coverage which occupies 13.48 per cent (234.09 hours).

    Top content type
    CONTENT TYPE    Duration in Hour:Min:Secs    % contribution
    CRIME/LAW & ORDER
    513:22:25
    29.54
    SPORTS NEWS
    234:09:29
    13.48
    POLITICAL NEWS/GOVERNMENT NEWS
    217:51:04
    12.54
    ENTERTAINMENT NEWS
    199:30:19
    11.48
    FINANCIAL NEWS
    121:29:59
    6.99
    BUSINESS NEWS
    66:46:40
    3.84
    SOCIAL
    58:49:14
    3.39
    SPIRITUAL/RELIGION
    57:27:32
    3.31
    ASTROLOGY
    57:05:23
    3.29
    MISHAPS/FAILURE OF MACHINERY
    44:38:12
    2.57
    source : News Content Track, Tam
    period : 14 Sept- 24 Oct

    News on politics is still not the favourite with news channels. Political news covers only 12.54 per cent (217.51 hours), followed by entertainment news which is 11.48 per cent (199.30 hours) of the entire programming.

    News channels spent 6.99 per cent on financial news and 3.84 per cent on business news. Humour covers 2.17 per cent of the time while news on sting and scandals contributes 0.02 per cent. News channels spend the minimum time on spoofs (0.01 per cent, 0.08 minutes).

    Top stories
    Story
    Total    %
    DELHI BOMB BLASTS
    115:13:26
    6.63
    BORDER GAVASKAR SERIES 08
    74:03:48
    4.26
    BOLLYWOOD UPDATES
    57:21:48
    3.30
    ZODIAC FORECAST
    57:05:13
    3.29
    SHOOT OUT IN DELHI
    51:34:40
    2.97
    AUSTRALIA TOUR OF INDIA(2008)
    49:41:01
    2.86
    INDIAN MARKET UPDATES
    40:39:20
    2.34
    COMEDY PROGRAM
    37:24:24
    2.15
    MNS WORKERS BEAT UP OUTSTATION CANDIDATES (MUMBAI)
    36:26:22
    2.10
    REPORT ON BLASTS IN INDIA
    34:41:58
    2.00
    source : News Content Track, Tam
    period : 14 Sept- 24 Oct

    The Delhi bomb blast became the top story (6.63 per cent) that was shown repeatedly by the news channels during this period, followed by the India-Australia cricket series (4.26 per cent). In the top story ranking, Bollywood updates covered 3.30 per cent while zodiac forecast was 3.29 per cent.

  • NBA’s News Broadcasting Standards (Disputes Redressal) Authority begins operation

    NBA’s News Broadcasting Standards (Disputes Redressal) Authority begins operation

    NEW DELHI: News Broadcasters Association’s (NBA) “News Broadcasting Standards (Disputes Redressal) Authority” which was formed earlier on 22 August, 2008 to enforce NBA’s code of ethics and broadcasting standards has begun operation from today 2 October.

    Headed by former chief justice and former NHRC chairperson Justice J S Verma the nine member authority includes historian Ramachandra Guha, former Nasscom chief Kiran Karnik, JNU don Dipankar Gupta and economist and ex-under secretary general of UN, Nitin Desai who are four members from non-news television background while its editor-members are, India TV managing editor Vinod Kapri, Zee News group editor B V Rao, Star News managing editor Milind Khandekar and Times Now editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami.

    At a press conference organised in Delhi, Verma said, “This is an initiative taken by the Indian news television industry and I am more than happy to be a part of this. It is good to see that the broadcasters have realised the need to come together to regulate the industry. We would try to resolve the grievances keeping the interest of the audiences and broadcasters.”

    As per the self- regulation mechanism if any broadcaster, television journalist or news agency is found guilty of showing in appropriate content the authority can warn, admonish, censure, express disapproval against or impose a fine of Rs 1 lakh upon the broadcaster, television journalist or news agency.

    The Authority can even recommend to the concerned authority for suspension, revocation of license, accreditation of such broadcaster, television journalist or news agency.

    When asked about the amount of fined levied is too low for broadcasters, Verma replied, “it’s not a matter of charging Rs 1 lakh or one rupee as the fine; it’s the matter of self-respect. One time fine might not tarnish a broadcaster’s reputation but if it’s repeated then I am sure even the broadcaster will worry about its reputation being mottled both in the industry and in front of the viewers.”

    The functioning of the authority is restricted to the members of NBA which has 14 broadcasters with 130 channels including regional channels like Sun TV, ETV and general English and Hindi news channels as its members.

    Within fourteen days from the date of receipt of a complain, a copy of the complain alongwith a notice requiring the broadcaster to show cause why action should not be taken against it, will be sent to the broadcaster against whom the complaint has been made.

    According to the Authority the maximum time that will be taken to resolve complains will be three months.

    It is mandatory for the Authority to meet at least once in every two months. And the quorum of such meeting would consist of at least five members including the chairperson and two more members from non-news television background and two members from editors’ side of the table.

    The summary of every enquiry would be available on NBA’s website which will be launched in another 10 days, through press release and in the annual report of NBA which will be published in various newspapers.

  • High Court asks private news channels to adhere to Olympic telecast rules

    High Court asks private news channels to adhere to Olympic telecast rules

    NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has asked all private television channels not to violate the guidelines relating to the footage of the ongoing Olympics in Beijing for which the International Olympic Association has given exclusive rights to Prasar Bharati.

    Ms Justice Reva Khetrapal noted that the rules were clear that “private channels shall use the footages upto the specified limit of 10 seconds at a time and two minutes per day in their news programmes”. The court said its ruling related to all news channels including those not represented in court.

    The order came yesterday in response to a petition filed by Prasar Bharati against news channels run by TV India Ltd, NDTV, Times Now, and others, particular in view of telecast of the opening ceremony.

    The public broadcaster has now been asked to file details of the loss it has suffered because of violation by various news channels and claim damages if any.

    The Court has listed the matter to come up for further hearing on 26 August by when Prasar Bharati will also file its affidavit as the Olympics are ending on 24 August.

    A senior Doordarshan official linked to sports coverage told indiantelevision.com that DD had been monitoring the telecast being done by various news channels directly and through TAM. The official said while the sports channels had generally worked out agreements with DD about sharing signals, the news channels had failed to do so.

    DD Counsel Dinkar Kalra told indiantelevision.com that he expects to raise the issue of contempt of court order before the court on 24 August since the news channels have continued to violate yesterday’s order.

    The Television News Access Rules framed by the International Olympics Committee say that when exclusive television rights to broadcast the Olympics are granted by the IOC to any organisation for a particular territory, “no other organisation may broadcast sound or images of any Olympic events including sporting action, opening, closing and medal ceremonies, other activities (including training and interviews) which occur at Olympic venues in that territory”.

    However, the rules say that in appropriate cases, the IOC may agree with rights holders in their particular territories to issue supplemental news access rules for such territories

  • Chintamani Rao to replace Sunil Lulla as Times Now CEO

    Chintamani Rao to replace Sunil Lulla as Times Now CEO

    MUMBAI: Chintamani Rao has been appointed CEO of Times Global Broadcasting – Bennett, Coleman & Co Ltd’s broadcast arm that owns and operates English news channel Times Now.

    Rao replaces Sunil Lulla, who has resigned as of Thursday and is joining production house and soon to be broadcaster Miditech.

    When contacted, Rao would only say, “I will reveal my plans within the next four weeks.”

    Times Group officials were unavailable for comment at the time of filing this report.

    It was last Friday that it was announced that Rao had resigned from the post of CEO of Rajat Sharma’s Independent News Service (INS), which owns and operates Hindi news channel India TV. A media industry veteran with over 30 years in the business, Rao joined India TV in September 2005 from Universal McCann Integrated Communications, where he was president.

  • Reuters pulling out of Times Now JV

    Reuters pulling out of Times Now JV

    MUMBAI: A near three-year old relationship between Reuters Group Plc and Bennett, Coleman & Co Ltd in Times Global Broadcasting, the joint venture which owns and operates English news channel Times Now, has come to an end.

    Reliable industry sources inform Indiantelevision.com that Thursday marked the last day that Reuters, which holds a 26 per cent stake in Times Global Broadcasting, would be contributing monetarily to Times Now’s operating costs. Additionally, Reuters has already started the process of looking for a new broadcast partner in India, the sources say.

    When asked for a response on the developments, Times Global Broadcasting CEO Sunil Lulla stated, “We have no comment to offer.”

    Speculation is rife that differences over editorial direction were what ultimately led to the parting of ways between the Times Group’s broadcast arm and Reuters but this is something that could not be independently confirmed at the time of filing this report.
     

  • Three-way tussle in the English news channel arena

    Three-way tussle in the English news channel arena

    The English news channel market, unlike the situation existing in the Hindi arena, is not about cutthroat competition and a constant search for new and ever more outrageous attention grabbing news pegs. A three player fight for bragging rights as well as a more broadbased target audience allows for far greater ‘traditional news’ play among the channels.

     

    A detailed analysis of the English news channels using Tam data (All India, C&S 15+, all day parts) during the one-year period beginning January 2007 reveals that there is no clear leader in the genre.

     

    2007 has seen the number one position baton changing hands between the three – NDTV 24×7, CNN IBN and Times Now more than. Still, looking at average annual relative shares it is NDTV 24X7 that is ahead by a nose with 29.75 per cent. In second spot is CNN IBN with 28.5 per cent average annual relative share, just ahead of Times Now which at 27.25 per cent.

     

    Hovering in a range between 28 and 31 per cent, NDTV 24X7 was in the top position in the February to June period. In July-August, with 28 and 30 per cent respectively NDTV 24X7 lost the crowning position to CNN-IBN. Occupying 28 per cent in November, NDTV 24X7 had to give away the top place to Times Now. It rounded off the year sharing 29 per cent each with Times Now to be in the top place.

     

    On the other hand CNN IBN started the year in the top position with 31 per cent but handed over the reins to NDTV 24X7 thereafter. Picking up in the months of July and August with 32 per cent and 30 per cent respectively, the relative share of CNN IBN started falling drastically and hit 25 per cent in November and 28 per cent in December.

     

    CNN IBN editor-in-chief Rajdeep Sardesai said, “I feel that sometimes too much is inspected of the frills, but making the cake is the real challenge. That is my biggest worry: how do you relentlessly make quality news without getting into the ratings war.”

     

    In terms of market share, though Times Now has seen some highs and lows in the year, yet the English news channel has displayed the best progress overall of the three. In its second year since launch, Times Now has been able to break the two-channel shackle in the English news genre.

     

    It started the year with relative share as low as 22 per cent. It gained in February to April period to reach 31 per cent but started slipping down since then dabbling between 25 to 26 per cent. It hit 31 per cent in November and for the first time held the highest position. Even though it fell to 29 per cent in December, yet it retained its top place to end the year on a high note.

     

    Times Now editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami said: “Our idea was to get into the minds of the viewer which we successfully did in 11 months of launch in 2006, the year of our launch. The clear target was to become the default news habit of the country. And we closed 2007 as the unquestionable number 1 news channel in India not just in the English news channel space but even when putting Hindi and English news channels together. It is a good feeling. But what gives me satisfaction as a journalist is that we have set the modus operandi. We have broken 90 per cent some of the biggest stories of 2007.

     

    “Newshour at 9 PM is doing well. We are the clear number 1 in this segment. People watch news channels for news. So instead of having niche shows in an important band time, we have news at 6 pm, 9 pm.

     

    “We have our sports show at 8:30 pm. We do not place a show in a particular slot just to compete with others in the same slot. Only a confident channel can do that. I do not pass off as a sports show where two people sit in a studio and keep blabbering. The game is more dynamic,” he asserts.

     

    For Hindi News channel market leader Aaj Tak’s English sibling Headlines Today though, the story continues to be that of the straggler. With an average annual relative share of 11.6 per cent, it had managed its highest of 14 per cent in November. It gathered 13 per cent each in January, June and August. It has its lowest of 9 per cent in May.

     

    Meanwhile, international news channels BBC World and CNN have an average annual relative market share of 1.3 per cent and 1.5 per cent respectively.

     

    Still, as Sardesai correctly points out, the news channel battle is not just about eyeballs but perception. “The future battle will be of perceptions, of influence, or being thought leaders. In CNN IBN. That’s been our aim, to be thought leaders,” he avers.

  • NBA Content Code put in cold storage

    NEW DELHI: The proposed Code of Content drafted by news broadcasters in retaliation to the government’s attempt to ‘curb press freedom’ through the latter’s Content Code is gathering dust, with no one in the news TV industry interested in talking about it.

    “There is no forward movement and nothing is likely in the short run, that is for sure,” said a senior editor who also revealed that the draft that had been placed for the consideration of all news channels is mundane and routine: “there’s nothing that can be talked about”, the source said.

    Arnav Goswami, Editor of “Times Now” channel had been given the task – on behalf of the News Broadcasters Association (NBA) of developing a draft Code of Content, with specifics about what would be penalties and who would impose them, but not much of that has found place in the draft, sources said.

    The NBA, which has been closely guarded on the issue of their own draft from the beginning, had also decided to rope in news broadcasters beyond the periphery of Delhi and Mumbai based channels to give their proposed Code a national character, but so far this process too has not take off.

    “We shall place a Code with the government,” said the source. “But that will take a long time, and the government playing on the back foot and the prime minister almost supporting our cause by asking the ministry to go slow, has given us the opportunity.”

    Sources in the industry say that the news TV channels are not at all seriously inclined towards any Code, and the mandarins are not sure they will ever be able to come to a consensus on the Code the industry itself is developing.

    “In a situation where every editor is an intellectual in his own right and with their own egos to serve, it is practically impossible to have a commonly acceptable Code, for each one is going to haggle over every word, all in the name of protecting the rights of the press,” a senior broadcast lawyer told Indiantelevision.com.

    Officially, NBA is not speaking at all, insisting that this is not in the public domain. A senior executive in a broadcasting cmpany said that discussions are going on and “may be in three or four months time this will bear fruit”.

  • Times Now to launch Twenty20 cricket special series

    MUMBAI: Times Now is set to launch a Twenty20 cricket special series ‘T20-Fast and Furious’ from 15 September at 7:30 pm.

    Hosted by Sunder Iyer, the show will offer viewers highlights and interesting insights into the daily matches over the tournament period.

    Sunder Iyer said, “The show aims to provide cricket fans a prelude to the look, feel and flavour that is all set to dominate the attention of the cricket crazy nation… giving them a thorough insight on how the teams stack up going into the prized tournament.”

  • Times Now launches weekly entertainment show E-NOW

    Times Now launches weekly entertainment show E-NOW

    Mumbai:Times Now, extended its entertainment programming to weekdays by announcing the launch of a daily format show named E-Now. The show will roll-out from 12 February Monday to Friday at 10:30 pm

    Speaking on the occasion Times Now CEO Sunil Lulla said, “Entertainment makes news everyday in India, TIMES NOW recognizes the importance of Entertainment to the Indian audience. With E-Now, TIMES NOW further consolidates its leadership position and brings to its viewers the Big story from the world of entertainment each night.”

    E-NOW will feature breaking stories, trend stories and stories on entertainment that take place in India and across the world.

    The show will be presented in a live format anchored by new face Romeo D’costa.

    Speaking on the occasion, Arnab Goswami, Editor-in-Chief, TIMES NOW said “E-NOW is racy and newsy. Its non-preachy, pro-new age and very liberal in its outlook. Its appointment viewing for the vast audience who is so involved with the world of entertainment.”

  • What Women Want

    It’s a socio political statement that became a mass movement. Today countries across the world celebrate it. It is ironic that what started out as a protest movement to discuss the terrible working conditions and low wages for women in a textile factory in New York City has been reduced to a jamboree of commercial messages that media indulges in every year.

    So we at Indiantelevision.com, decided to step out of the circle and ask a few women in power across the board what they thought about Women’s Day and whether at the end of all the lip service paid to them and their talent, corporates were actually sensitive to their needs. A range of answers, most of them positive of course, lead us to believe that corporates are indeed sensitive to their women employees. But it is also a sign of times that most women we spoke to take pride in the fact that they have made it to the top not because of organizational support, but despite it.

     

    It’s a large talent pool out there waiting to be explored and exploited. Is it time media organizations take heed. Perhaps it is.

    Here is a look at what some power women had to say –

    Vyas Gianetti creative chairwoman and chief creative officer, Preeti Vyas Gianetti says: “The business scenario in India still works within man made structures. It is a highly competitive field and women are proving to be an important human resource. Studies indicate that women are much better at handling relationships; they are better team workers and team builders, more inclusive and surprisingly – bigger risk takers. Women are also more defiant in defeat, that is, they have an attitude that screams ‘I’ll show you… I’ll do this better next time’.”

    So are corporates recognizing this trend?

    “I would say that there is an increased appreciation of women’s talents in the corporate sphere today than ever before. But we have to admit that it is a slow process. Some corporates are agnostic to the change; some others are taking their time but are making the effort. I know that the HR policies and therefore thewomen leaders in a corporate like ICICI get a huge boost but the media is catching up too.

    “I also think that corporates would be ignoring the innate leadership capacity of a woman at their own peril. Greater acceptance needs to come in and in fact will.

    “Also the glass ceiling affect is an internal proposition and most women have already broken through it. The need to restructure corporate policies will occur but once again, these are not compromises that a corporate is making. They are merely augmenting a process that will benefit their talent at work.

    “That said, any such support by a corporate cannot be forced. That kind of culture must evolve and will evolve over a period.”

     

     

    Madison Media Group CEO Punitha Arumugam takes a clear position about why women should not ask for concessions or privileges from their organizations. “Is media woman friendly? But why should they be. I think corporates judge you by your capability and not what priorities you may or may not have. As for the whole myth of a glass ceiling, I think women broke that a long time ago. My whole point is, ‘why should corporates be held responsible for the personal choices we make.’ So sure, women might want to prioritize their family but then they will also have to fend for a back up or support system. To make an organisation responsible for it is unfair. And making work an excuse for neglecting a family or not having a family is not right either.”

    Nick VP & GM Nina Elavia Jaipuria who has experience in advertising, FMCG and media believes that there is no real gender bias or preference within the media industry, both genders are given an equal opportunity to deliver. As far as balancing work with family, it works in the same manner for males as well. 

    Jaipuria adds, “Its more about the intent, you have to prioritise. If you want it to happen, you have to make it happen. And as for juggling work and home, multi-tasking is what women do best, its comes naturally.”

     

    CNBC TV 18 anchor Shereen Bhan is a recognizable face in the field of business television. She tell us why corporates may have to look at some of their talent and provide support to them if they intend to retain them. She says, “I think with media the problem that we essentially would talk about is time. Fortunately in media we also have a ‘flexi time’. We do not keep predictable time but that also means that if we are not talking a 9 to 5 job, we are also not talking about being at work 24/7.

    “I think what corporates need to address is the question of a support system for all its employees and not based on gender alone. Should we have special privileges? Increasingly corporates do step in and look at a particular talent and see if it’s worth their while to accept certain demands. This is not a case of bias, but then you also have to prove your merit before you get special privileges.

    “Also, I think, the reason why one might notice fewer women at the top is simply because women do opt out themselves and this might have nothing to do with the organisation. You can’t be everything to everybody. So yes, in the case of some women, the glass ceiling is purely internal.”

    Times Now anchor Mini Menon gives a thumbs up to most organizations she has worked with as well. “I think when you work with professional corporate organizations you do not have to worry about gender concerns. I have worked as a reporter across organizations like BiTV, Star, CNBC and now Times Now and they have all been equally sensitive. So whether you are talking security during reportage, late nights or even living conditions while on report assignments, the news organisation has been most supportive.

    “While I was at CNBC and closer to my delivery date I was given the choice to work fewer hours or even now at Times Now I am given complete freedom. But apart from the sensitivity issue, I think most women also understand that if an organization goes that extra mile for you, you have to be equally responsible at work.”

    Red FM RJ Malishka, who has just completed a marathon shopping session gearing up for the morning Women’s Day special, huffs and pants through the conversation when she says, “Radio is at a nascent stage and although it is male dominated, being fewer in number is an advantage. Yes, there are pre set ideas and lines are drawn clearly between men and women junta at work, Red still tends to be more supportive of us women.”

    Does she ever wonder what it would be like to do the balancing act between being a mother and a cool RJ all at the same time? “You have a field like advertising and you know you will be working crazy hours there. My sister has to work crazy schedules and I always tell her to quit because really, it’s bad for the ovaries. That said, I can almost imagine a day when I will wheel in a pram into the radio on air studio and say ‘Be quiet, mama needs to go on air for the next 30 minutes’.” Cool mom, indeed.

    ShowM’s Ravina Raj Kohli says that she has never faced any such discrimination during her ongoing career in media. “It becomes a problem when you think of it as a problem,” she asserts. 

    TV 18 web property IndiWo editor Swapna Chidambaram says, “I believe that the media is one sphere that allows you to choose the hours you want to work. It gives you the freedom to be a free lancer if you should so choose.”

    “Earlier, women picked 9 to 5 jobs and were satisfied. Today they venture out, look at a vast variety of disciplines and choose to work in a competitive arena. Today you have more female photographers choosing what was once a male domain. The talent pool has increased and this is certain to contribute to even more women leaders.

    “A more important issue that I would place stress on is that women should take an equal onus to perform. In media women can prove themselves based on talent and dedication and rise based on merit alone. So today, we need to establish ourselves as expert writers, photographers or whatever our chosen domain is and NOT on account of being a “woman” in a man’s world or anything.”

    UTV broadcast COO Zarina Mehta explains that because the media industry is still new, 7-8 years old, it is largely dominated by women. “I believe everyone is given an equal chance and that just goes to show what women can do. Maybe, in other industries like banking and engineering there still exists a bias. 

    “I don’t believe in Women’s Day!” staunchly declares Mehta.

    Strong words we admit. But is it such a rosy picture after all? The predominantly female team at Indiantelevision.com thinks that’s just one more facet to a woman at work. It ain’t all good, but there’s no point complaining. As for the organizations, amidst all the celebrations and cake cutting, it would be a great time to sit back and reflect on what can be done to give women power the impetus it clearly needs.

    On that note, Happy Women’s Day!