Tag: The Competition Commission of India

  • CCI approves Jio Cinema OTT and Viacom 18 Media merger

    CCI approves Jio Cinema OTT and Viacom 18 Media merger

    Mumbai: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) approved the proposed merger of Jio Cinema OTT and Viacom18 Media on Monday.

    Following an investment by BTS Investment and Reliance Projects & Property Management Services, the CCI announced in a tweet on Monday that it had approved the merger of the Jio Cinema OTT platform with Viacom18 Media.

     

     

    In April, Reliance Industries (RIL) and Viacom18 announced a strategic partnership with Bodhi Tree Systems. According to an agreement signed, Bodhi Tree was obliged to invest Rs 13,500 crore in Viacom18, and Reliance Projects & Property Management Services, a wholly-owned subsidiary of RIL, was informed to invest Rs 1,645 crore in the broadcaster, forming one of India’s largest TV and digital streaming firms. As a result, Reliance’s popular Jio Cinema OTT app was transferred to Viacom18.

    Bodhi Tree Systems (BTS) is a joint venture between James Murdoch’s Lupa Systems and the former chairman of Star India and Disney India Uday Shankar.

    IT support services are provided by Reliance Projects & Property Management Services. Through its portfolio of channels and streaming service Voot, Viacom18 Media engages in the business of offering media and entertainment services.

    Deals that exceed a specific threshold require regulator permission, which keeps an eye on unethical commercial practices in the market.

  • Sony-Zee to create $10 bn TV company; likely to hurt competition in the market: CCI

    Sony-Zee to create $10 bn TV company; likely to hurt competition in the market: CCI

    Mumbai: According to an official notice seen by Reuters, the country’s antitrust watchdog the Competition Commission of India (CCI) found in an initial review that a merger between the Indian unit of Japan’s Sony and Zee Entertainment to create a $10 billion TV company will potentially hurt competition because it will have “unparalleled bargaining power.”

    CCI notice to the two companies sent on 3 August stated the watchdog is of the view that a further investigation is merited. It gave the two companies 30 days from 3 August to respond.

    Sony and Zee in December decided to merge their television channels, film assets, and streaming platforms to create a powerhouse in a key media and entertainment growth market of 1.4 billion people, challenging rivals like Walt Disney Co.

    According to the three lawyers familiar with the process mentioned, the CCI’s conclusions will delay regulatory approval of the acquisition and might require the companies to propose changes to its structure.

    They also added that if that doesn’t satisfy the CCI, it can result in a drawn-out approval and inquiry procedure.

    Zee in a statement said it continues to take all the required legal steps to complete all the necessary approval processes for the proposed merger.

    According to the CCI’s 21-page notice, the proposed deal would place the combined entity in a “strong position” with around 92 channels in India, citing Sony’s global revenue of $86 billion and assets of $211 billion.

    “Such apparently humongous market position would enable the combined entity to enjoy an unparalleled bargaining power,” the CCI said in its notice, adding the combined entity could increase the price of channel packages.

    The initial review shows the deal is likely to cause an “appreciable adverse effect on competition,” the watchdog said. “Thus, it is considered appropriate to conduct further inquiry into the matter.”

    In a media interview held in December last year, Zee’s managing director Punit Goenka stated that the combined entity’s relative value is “potentially close to $10 billion” and that all necessary approvals are expected by October of this year.

    Classic Merger Case

    According to industry executives, the deal will allow the two companies to compete with Disney’s Star India network, which has dozens of popular entertainment and sports channels, by attracting more advertising revenue from streaming services and TV broadcasts.

    The combined company would have a share of almost 45 per cent of the Hindi language market, which attracts the greatest viewership in the nation, according to the preliminary CCI competition assessment, with Star coming in a “distant second.”

    This would further concentrate such segments at the cost of the competition, the CCI said in its notice.

    Sony and Zee had already responded in June and July to two so-called “defect” letters issued by the watchdog inquiring about the deal.

    After reviewing submissions about advertising revenue, the CCI concluded that the combined company would probably raise the price of some advertisements in order to take advantage of its dominant market position.

    “The combined strength of the parties is likely to be used to entrench their presence and earn higher profits,” the CCI said.

    “This merger is a classic case of the first or second largest player, integrating with the third largest competitors, to become the strong market leader.”

  • CCI wants release of films not to be held up by exhibitors & distributors

    CCI wants release of films not to be held up by exhibitors & distributors

    NEW DELHI: The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has sought to ensure fair play in disputes between theatres and production houses by directing that all movie halls – whether standalone or part of multiplexes – cannot take a discriminatory decision against a particular movie or production company.

    The order came on an appeal by Eros International Media and Sunshine Pictures and others.

    The CCI said several film bodies and associations had been indulging in various anti-competitive activities in violation of competition rules by asking producers to compulsorily register their films before release.

    CCI Chairman Ashok Chawla said: "There have been a few complaints and we want to ensure there is fair play and the principles of competition should be upheld." There must be smooth functioning between producers, distributors and exhibitors so that movies goers are not affected, he added.

    A distributor buys rights for screening a film in a particular "territory" and recovers costs from the exhibition of the film.

    "However, often due to problems arising out of revenue sharing or past dues, exhibitors refuse to screen films," said Chawla. "This will have to stop, exhibitors would not be allowed to discriminate between movies and producers based on past records."