Tag: Television

  • PEMRA suspends ARY’s Nickelodeon licence for airing Indian content

    PEMRA suspends ARY’s Nickelodeon licence for airing Indian content

    MUMBAI: It wants to signal it means business. And, that it is not going to tolerate any laxity on its diktat to totally ban Indian content on television, radio and cinema in Pakistan. The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) yesterday suspended the landing licence of Viacom TV channel Nickelodeon for airing animation shows dubbed in Hindi.

    PEMRA made the announcement via a tweet from its twitter handle late last evening.

    The channel is distributed in Pakistan via the Ary Digital Network which has its headquarters in Dubai. ARY runs a clutch of channels including ARY News, Zindagi, QTV, Muzik, Digital etc.

    ARY is broadcast in several Asian countries through the services of Samacom’s uplinking earth station based in the UAE. The network has Mohammed Iqbal as its chairperson; Salman Iqbal being its president & CEO.

    http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/drupal7.indiantelevision.co.in/files/styles/large/public/PEMRA-800x800.jpg?itok=ODPsZJQu

    The authority had issued an order last month directing Pakistani channels to reduce Indian content to six per cent, and followed it up with another notice forcing them to reduce it to zero by 21 October. It has stated that those violating its order would face dire consequences, among which could include cancellation or suspension of downlinking (read: landing) and uplinking permissions that it grants.

    A clutch of broadcasters under the Pakistan Broadcasters Association has been contemplating taking PEMRA to  court for its hard stance on the Indian and foreign content issue.

    Related stories:

    Pakistan gets tough on Indian DTH & content

    Pak bans Indian TV content, films from being screened

    PEMRA Indian content ban to impact broadcasters

    “Let India open its market, we will open ours” – PEMRA chairman Absar Alam

    Pakistan Broadcasters Association to oppose PEMRA Indian content ban

  • IPL media rights bidding postponed sine die

    IPL media rights bidding postponed sine die

    MUMBAI: The BCCI has made it clear that the media rights auction cannot take place till the time it gets a concrete go-ahead and a formal approval from the Justice RM Lodha committee. Till the evening of 24 October (Monday), BCCI did not receive the okay from the committee which said, “it is in receipt of the communications from the BCCI and that it would issue directions after meeting amongst themselves.”

    Uncertainty loomed over auction as representatives from the 18 international bidders who have bought the ITT documents would have their business schedule in a mess. If the BCCI goes ahead with the bidding process, it could cause contempt of court.

    The BCCI had appointed Deloitte to supervise the opening and studying of the bid. Before the SC order came on Friday, the tenders were slated to be submitted on October 25.

    The BCCI had been awaiting a response from the Justice Lodha panel on the appointment of an independent auditor. Today being the scheduled day for opening of bidding for broadcast, mobile and internet rights, the auditor may not come through as the three-member panel is not meeting (on Tuesday). The Lodha panel was earlier expected to meet on October 21 but the meeting was later cancelled.

    BCCI gave a third reminder to the Lodha panel on Sunday, asking it whether they could stage Tuesday’s media rights bidding or not. The board also explained how the uncertainty surrounding the bidding process has given rise to several queries from the prospective bidders. In a letter, BCCI also reminded the panel how the board has submitted all the relevant papers in time and how clarity would be needed to complete the bidding process.

    It was also disclosed that the board would continue to discuss the matter with all the stake-holders of the game on Tuesday with a hope that the Lodha panel would take necessary steps.

    BCCI, in a statement, stated late last night:

    Indian Premier League Media Rights (Television & Digital)

    The global tender for award Indian Premier League Media Rights (Television & Digital) for the cricket season 2018 and onwards was issued on the 19th of September 2016 after a detailed exercise by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (“BCCI”). The BCCI team invested a lot of time and money in framing of a tender with norms to ensure the highest levels of transparency.

    It was expected that the new IPL season rights that were to be awarded would bring in huge revenue for the game of cricket and expectations amongst the BCCI, players and the cricket loving public ran high in the build up to the award of the IPL tender. This was more so in view of the fact that the IPL has been successfully piloted by the BCCI with support of all stakeholders to become one of the important events in the world cricketing calendar and has apart from providing a platform for showcasing domestic cricket talent resulted in the country being projected as an important sporting destination. In fact the IPL has resulted in the active building of Brand India and has brought laurels to the country.  The IPL has also contributed substantially to the Indian Economy.

    At the time the tender was floated and even till date there has been no complaint by any person that the tender was being issued in a non-transparent manner or that there appeared to be problems with any of its terms and conditions. The Potential Bidders who bought the Tender document had requested for certain Clarification, to which BCCI issued responses in 2 sets. Set 1 of the response to Clarification was issued on 14th October 2016 and Set 2 was issued on 20th October 2016. Based on the clarification issued, BCCI was subsequently to issue the Revised Media Rights Agreements (MRAs) along with the order relevant documents, which were not issued on account of the Hon’ble Supreme Court Order.

    The BCCI has also appointed independent agencies to vet the legal, financial and technical details of the bids as well as the bidders.

    In the meanwhile the BCCI received a copy of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CA No.4235/2014 – BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar & Ors. dated 21.10.2016 (“Judgment”) at 650pm issuing the following directions in relation to tender processes being undertaken by the BCCI:

    “(ii)(a) The Committee appointed by this Court is requested to appoint an independent auditor to scrutinise and audit the income received and expenditure incurred by BCCI; (b) The auditor shall also oversee the tendering process that will hereinafter be undertaken by BCCI, as well as the award of contracts above a threshold value to be fixed by the Committee; (c) The award of contracts by BCCIabove the threshold fixed by the Committee shall be subject to the prior approval of the Committee; (d) The Committee shall be at liberty to obtain the advice of the auditors on the fairness of the tendering process which has been adopted by BCCIand in regard to all relevant facts and circumstances; (e) The Committee will determine whether a proposed contract above the threshold value should or should not be approved; and (f) The Committee will be at liberty to formulate the terms of engagement and reference to the auditors having regard to the above directions.  BCCI shall defray the costs, charges and expenses of the auditors.”  

    In view of the aforesaid directions, as the Committee has been entrusted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court with the mandate of overseeing the tender process and in effect is now the custodian of the IPL tender process and has to take all actions to safeguard the IPL tender and the interest of BCCI and cricket in India, the BCCI wrote to the Committee on 21st October 2016 itself immediately on receipt of the Judgment, inter alia seeking guidance on (a) whether to defer the IPL tender or (b) to cancel the same and (c) requesting that the name of the auditor appointed be intimated to the BCCI to ensure that he could be associated with the IPL tender. Further, BCCI has sent all the IPL Media Rights Tender documents to the Committee along with the Revised MRAs and relevant documents, which are yet to be issued to the Potential Bidders.

    Keeping in view the urgency in the matter, the BCCI has informed the Committee that the tender process being underway there were certain timelines that potential bidders were following. The BCCI also informed the Committee that a large number of potential bidders had travelled to the country from outside as bids had to be submitted in person.

    The BCCI has accordingly sent requests on 23rd October 2016 and 24th October 2016 to the Committee on the aforesaid lines and requested for confirmation of receipt of emails and an urgent response to avoid any uncertainty in the IPL tender process to avoid any inconvenience to potential bidders. The BCCI also informed the Committee that any delay in responding and resultant uncertainty was hurting the commercial interest of the BCCI as it would lead to devaluation of the commercial rights that were to be awarded.

    The BCCI has also received numerous queries from potential bidders explaining the hardship being faced by them due to the inability of the BCCI to address their queries and to furnish a clear roadmap on the way forward.  

    Today (on Monday, 24 october) at 3:07 pm the BCCI has received a response from the Committee asking for certain further undertakings from the BCCI and sought further clarifications. These have accordingly been furnished to the Committee. The BCCI has received a response from the Committee a short while ago stating that it is in receipt of the communications from the BCCI and that it would issue directions after meeting amongst themselves.

    The BCCI, apart from the above communication, has so far at the time of going to Press, not received any further directions from the Committee, which is now the custodian of the entire process and has been tasked with the duty to ensure that the tender process is undertaken in a professional and transparent manner with least inconvenience to all stakeholders. Once the BCCI receives a response from the Committee it shall bring the same to the notice of all stakeholders as the BCCI is currently not in a position to take any decision in the matter other than what the Committee recommends. In the absence of permission from the Committee to go ahead with the process scheduled for tomorrow, the BCCI is unable to do so.

    The BCCI requests all bidders to appreciate that the events as have occurred were unforeseen and something over which the BCCI has no control. The potential bidders would appreciate that in the past the BCCI has responded to all queries to potential bidders in a prompt fashion and has conducted the entire process in a fair, transparent and professional manner.

    BCCI offers its sincere apology to all potential bidders and stakeholders who have put in efforts to put together bids by expending considerable time and resources, and have travelled from all across the country and the world to take part in this event.

  • IPL media rights bidding postponed sine die

    IPL media rights bidding postponed sine die

    MUMBAI: The BCCI has made it clear that the media rights auction cannot take place till the time it gets a concrete go-ahead and a formal approval from the Justice RM Lodha committee. Till the evening of 24 October (Monday), BCCI did not receive the okay from the committee which said, “it is in receipt of the communications from the BCCI and that it would issue directions after meeting amongst themselves.”

    Uncertainty loomed over auction as representatives from the 18 international bidders who have bought the ITT documents would have their business schedule in a mess. If the BCCI goes ahead with the bidding process, it could cause contempt of court.

    The BCCI had appointed Deloitte to supervise the opening and studying of the bid. Before the SC order came on Friday, the tenders were slated to be submitted on October 25.

    The BCCI had been awaiting a response from the Justice Lodha panel on the appointment of an independent auditor. Today being the scheduled day for opening of bidding for broadcast, mobile and internet rights, the auditor may not come through as the three-member panel is not meeting (on Tuesday). The Lodha panel was earlier expected to meet on October 21 but the meeting was later cancelled.

    BCCI gave a third reminder to the Lodha panel on Sunday, asking it whether they could stage Tuesday’s media rights bidding or not. The board also explained how the uncertainty surrounding the bidding process has given rise to several queries from the prospective bidders. In a letter, BCCI also reminded the panel how the board has submitted all the relevant papers in time and how clarity would be needed to complete the bidding process.

    It was also disclosed that the board would continue to discuss the matter with all the stake-holders of the game on Tuesday with a hope that the Lodha panel would take necessary steps.

    BCCI, in a statement, stated late last night:

    Indian Premier League Media Rights (Television & Digital)

    The global tender for award Indian Premier League Media Rights (Television & Digital) for the cricket season 2018 and onwards was issued on the 19th of September 2016 after a detailed exercise by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (“BCCI”). The BCCI team invested a lot of time and money in framing of a tender with norms to ensure the highest levels of transparency.

    It was expected that the new IPL season rights that were to be awarded would bring in huge revenue for the game of cricket and expectations amongst the BCCI, players and the cricket loving public ran high in the build up to the award of the IPL tender. This was more so in view of the fact that the IPL has been successfully piloted by the BCCI with support of all stakeholders to become one of the important events in the world cricketing calendar and has apart from providing a platform for showcasing domestic cricket talent resulted in the country being projected as an important sporting destination. In fact the IPL has resulted in the active building of Brand India and has brought laurels to the country.  The IPL has also contributed substantially to the Indian Economy.

    At the time the tender was floated and even till date there has been no complaint by any person that the tender was being issued in a non-transparent manner or that there appeared to be problems with any of its terms and conditions. The Potential Bidders who bought the Tender document had requested for certain Clarification, to which BCCI issued responses in 2 sets. Set 1 of the response to Clarification was issued on 14th October 2016 and Set 2 was issued on 20th October 2016. Based on the clarification issued, BCCI was subsequently to issue the Revised Media Rights Agreements (MRAs) along with the order relevant documents, which were not issued on account of the Hon’ble Supreme Court Order.

    The BCCI has also appointed independent agencies to vet the legal, financial and technical details of the bids as well as the bidders.

    In the meanwhile the BCCI received a copy of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CA No.4235/2014 – BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar & Ors. dated 21.10.2016 (“Judgment”) at 650pm issuing the following directions in relation to tender processes being undertaken by the BCCI:

    “(ii)(a) The Committee appointed by this Court is requested to appoint an independent auditor to scrutinise and audit the income received and expenditure incurred by BCCI; (b) The auditor shall also oversee the tendering process that will hereinafter be undertaken by BCCI, as well as the award of contracts above a threshold value to be fixed by the Committee; (c) The award of contracts by BCCIabove the threshold fixed by the Committee shall be subject to the prior approval of the Committee; (d) The Committee shall be at liberty to obtain the advice of the auditors on the fairness of the tendering process which has been adopted by BCCIand in regard to all relevant facts and circumstances; (e) The Committee will determine whether a proposed contract above the threshold value should or should not be approved; and (f) The Committee will be at liberty to formulate the terms of engagement and reference to the auditors having regard to the above directions.  BCCI shall defray the costs, charges and expenses of the auditors.”  

    In view of the aforesaid directions, as the Committee has been entrusted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court with the mandate of overseeing the tender process and in effect is now the custodian of the IPL tender process and has to take all actions to safeguard the IPL tender and the interest of BCCI and cricket in India, the BCCI wrote to the Committee on 21st October 2016 itself immediately on receipt of the Judgment, inter alia seeking guidance on (a) whether to defer the IPL tender or (b) to cancel the same and (c) requesting that the name of the auditor appointed be intimated to the BCCI to ensure that he could be associated with the IPL tender. Further, BCCI has sent all the IPL Media Rights Tender documents to the Committee along with the Revised MRAs and relevant documents, which are yet to be issued to the Potential Bidders.

    Keeping in view the urgency in the matter, the BCCI has informed the Committee that the tender process being underway there were certain timelines that potential bidders were following. The BCCI also informed the Committee that a large number of potential bidders had travelled to the country from outside as bids had to be submitted in person.

    The BCCI has accordingly sent requests on 23rd October 2016 and 24th October 2016 to the Committee on the aforesaid lines and requested for confirmation of receipt of emails and an urgent response to avoid any uncertainty in the IPL tender process to avoid any inconvenience to potential bidders. The BCCI also informed the Committee that any delay in responding and resultant uncertainty was hurting the commercial interest of the BCCI as it would lead to devaluation of the commercial rights that were to be awarded.

    The BCCI has also received numerous queries from potential bidders explaining the hardship being faced by them due to the inability of the BCCI to address their queries and to furnish a clear roadmap on the way forward.  

    Today (on Monday, 24 october) at 3:07 pm the BCCI has received a response from the Committee asking for certain further undertakings from the BCCI and sought further clarifications. These have accordingly been furnished to the Committee. The BCCI has received a response from the Committee a short while ago stating that it is in receipt of the communications from the BCCI and that it would issue directions after meeting amongst themselves.

    The BCCI, apart from the above communication, has so far at the time of going to Press, not received any further directions from the Committee, which is now the custodian of the entire process and has been tasked with the duty to ensure that the tender process is undertaken in a professional and transparent manner with least inconvenience to all stakeholders. Once the BCCI receives a response from the Committee it shall bring the same to the notice of all stakeholders as the BCCI is currently not in a position to take any decision in the matter other than what the Committee recommends. In the absence of permission from the Committee to go ahead with the process scheduled for tomorrow, the BCCI is unable to do so.

    The BCCI requests all bidders to appreciate that the events as have occurred were unforeseen and something over which the BCCI has no control. The potential bidders would appreciate that in the past the BCCI has responded to all queries to potential bidders in a prompt fashion and has conducted the entire process in a fair, transparent and professional manner.

    BCCI offers its sincere apology to all potential bidders and stakeholders who have put in efforts to put together bids by expending considerable time and resources, and have travelled from all across the country and the world to take part in this event.

  • TRAI tariff order: MSOs welcome its direction

    TRAI tariff order: MSOs welcome its direction

    NEW DELHI: At least two multisystem operators (MSOs) have welcomed the broad drift of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s  (TRAI’s) Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) (Eighth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff Order, 2016. The draft, released on Monday, seeks to bring in transparency to an otherwise disorganized sector.

    Indiantelevision.com spoke to a bunch of executives from broadcasting, cable TV,  and even the TRAI advisor on the proposed regulation. Most said it was too early to comment as they had not got the time to study it.

    S N Sharma, who surprised many earlier this year by returning to the national multi-system operator (MSO) DEN Networks as its  chief executive, said “It is a good draft; we welcome it. It brings a lot of transparency and ease, especially in the life of the consumer. We, as an MSO, look for a fair share of revenue, and hope to get the same.” He said he still had to study the draft in full, and would give further comments later.

    public://sn-sharma_0.jpg
    S.N.Sharma CEO,DEN Networks Limited

    Regional MSO Ortel Communications President & CEO  Bhibhu Prasad Rath, welcoming the draft, said “We believe that this draft regulation, if implemented, will bring in path-breaking changes to the industry structure with a lot of transparency and non-discrimination.”

    Rath added: “Currently, there is widespread discrimination in the content deals done by some broadcasters with various DPOs (distribution platform operators). The prices of the same channels or bouquet of channels vary widely from one DPO to another across the country. The new proposed regulation intends to bring in uniformity in the cost structure so that a level-playing field will be created while we all compete in the same market.”

    Rath also noted that the other major issue that the regulations attempts to address is the unbundling of channels. “Currently, many broadcasters offer around 80-90% discount / incentives on a bouquet deal as compared to the sum of a la carte prices of the respective channels. This, in my view, is unreasonable and intended to discourage a la carte subscription. The proposed regulation, by capping the bouquet discount at a maximum of 15%, will be a big relief to consumers who want to subscribe to channels on a la carte basis and will encourage DPOs to pass on to the benefit to consumers.”

    “Overall, this regulation, in addition to bringing in non-discriminatory and transparent practices in the industry, will go a long way in implementing digitization in its true spirit where “choice” is in the hands of the consumers,” he concluded.

    “I think it is a fabulous piece of proposed regulation,” says HITS consultant Castle Media director Vynsley Fernandes. “I think the TRAI has really outdone itself. I can only see the industry opening up and growing from hereon.”

    However, National Cable and Telecommunications head and founder of Home Cable Network of Delhi, Vikki Choudhry was the dissenting voice. Said he:  “This draft order is still not a cost-based tariff fixation, TRAI was supposed to conduct an exercise according to the Supreme Court and TDSAT orders. This draft tariff is completely anti-consumer. When the present tariff (rates) were coming down by 70 per cent, the regulator has further provisioned an increase of about 45-55 per cent for the Pay TV broadcasters.”

    (In May this year, TDSAT had said it thought TRAI “will be well advised to have a fresh look at the various tariff orders in a holistic manner and come out with a comprehensive tariff order in supersession of all the earlier tariff orders.”) Sunil Gupta, advisor to TRAI, responding to this allegation said: “We have protected the interests of the consumer: why should he pay even one extra rupee for a channel he does not want to watch? This draft brings the power of choice to the consumer’s hands. He can choose to have a lower cable TV bill or higher.”

    Gupta further added that the new category of  premium channels will allow broadcasters to offer specialized channels at higher MRPs – even Rs 100 – if the consumer wants them at this price, thus overall increasing the ARPUs of all those in the value chain.

    Gupta also said that the interconnection paper for local cable operators and multi-system operators would come out soon. The entire industry value chain should read this and understand we have protected everyone’s interests – the cable TV operators, MSOs, broadcasters, customers. The  ARPUs of the entire industry would go up in the coming months, he said.

    Also read:

    Tariff Hike Case: SC rejects appeal challenging TDSAT order; asks TRAI to out new tariff

     

  • TRAI tariff order: MSOs welcome its direction

    TRAI tariff order: MSOs welcome its direction

    NEW DELHI: At least two multisystem operators (MSOs) have welcomed the broad drift of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s  (TRAI’s) Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) (Eighth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff Order, 2016. The draft, released on Monday, seeks to bring in transparency to an otherwise disorganized sector.

    Indiantelevision.com spoke to a bunch of executives from broadcasting, cable TV,  and even the TRAI advisor on the proposed regulation. Most said it was too early to comment as they had not got the time to study it.

    S N Sharma, who surprised many earlier this year by returning to the national multi-system operator (MSO) DEN Networks as its  chief executive, said “It is a good draft; we welcome it. It brings a lot of transparency and ease, especially in the life of the consumer. We, as an MSO, look for a fair share of revenue, and hope to get the same.” He said he still had to study the draft in full, and would give further comments later.

    public://sn-sharma_0.jpg
    S.N.Sharma CEO,DEN Networks Limited

    Regional MSO Ortel Communications President & CEO  Bhibhu Prasad Rath, welcoming the draft, said “We believe that this draft regulation, if implemented, will bring in path-breaking changes to the industry structure with a lot of transparency and non-discrimination.”

    Rath added: “Currently, there is widespread discrimination in the content deals done by some broadcasters with various DPOs (distribution platform operators). The prices of the same channels or bouquet of channels vary widely from one DPO to another across the country. The new proposed regulation intends to bring in uniformity in the cost structure so that a level-playing field will be created while we all compete in the same market.”

    Rath also noted that the other major issue that the regulations attempts to address is the unbundling of channels. “Currently, many broadcasters offer around 80-90% discount / incentives on a bouquet deal as compared to the sum of a la carte prices of the respective channels. This, in my view, is unreasonable and intended to discourage a la carte subscription. The proposed regulation, by capping the bouquet discount at a maximum of 15%, will be a big relief to consumers who want to subscribe to channels on a la carte basis and will encourage DPOs to pass on to the benefit to consumers.”

    “Overall, this regulation, in addition to bringing in non-discriminatory and transparent practices in the industry, will go a long way in implementing digitization in its true spirit where “choice” is in the hands of the consumers,” he concluded.

    “I think it is a fabulous piece of proposed regulation,” says HITS consultant Castle Media director Vynsley Fernandes. “I think the TRAI has really outdone itself. I can only see the industry opening up and growing from hereon.”

    However, National Cable and Telecommunications head and founder of Home Cable Network of Delhi, Vikki Choudhry was the dissenting voice. Said he:  “This draft order is still not a cost-based tariff fixation, TRAI was supposed to conduct an exercise according to the Supreme Court and TDSAT orders. This draft tariff is completely anti-consumer. When the present tariff (rates) were coming down by 70 per cent, the regulator has further provisioned an increase of about 45-55 per cent for the Pay TV broadcasters.”

    (In May this year, TDSAT had said it thought TRAI “will be well advised to have a fresh look at the various tariff orders in a holistic manner and come out with a comprehensive tariff order in supersession of all the earlier tariff orders.”) Sunil Gupta, advisor to TRAI, responding to this allegation said: “We have protected the interests of the consumer: why should he pay even one extra rupee for a channel he does not want to watch? This draft brings the power of choice to the consumer’s hands. He can choose to have a lower cable TV bill or higher.”

    Gupta further added that the new category of  premium channels will allow broadcasters to offer specialized channels at higher MRPs – even Rs 100 – if the consumer wants them at this price, thus overall increasing the ARPUs of all those in the value chain.

    Gupta also said that the interconnection paper for local cable operators and multi-system operators would come out soon. The entire industry value chain should read this and understand we have protected everyone’s interests – the cable TV operators, MSOs, broadcasters, customers. The  ARPUs of the entire industry would go up in the coming months, he said.

    Also read:

    Tariff Hike Case: SC rejects appeal challenging TDSAT order; asks TRAI to out new tariff

     

  • Pittie group to launch a new spiritual TV offering in Shubh TV

    Pittie group to launch a new spiritual TV offering in Shubh TV

    MUMBAI: The divine world in television is set to witness one more addition as chairman of Pittie group, Krishan Kumar Pittie  will launch a spiritual channel ‘Shubh TV tomorrow (8 April 2016).

    The channel will initially be present on DTH platforms Dish TV and DD free dish, but has plans of expanding its distribution in near future “We are starting with Dish TV and DD free dish but in next six months we plan to launch on all DTH platforms,” says  Krishan Kumar Pittie.     

    The channel will be airing lectures by prominent spiritual speakers from across the country and will also be featuring spiritual events. Its key focus in the beginning will be on the much talked ‘Kumbh’ which will host pilgrims from across the country starting next month.

     “We are pleased to announce our new venture in spiritual channels Shubh TV,” says the chairman.

    The sector has very little advertising happening on it and hence slot selling remains the key revenue generator. The new channel will also focus on slot selling, but at the same time will strive for better advertisement revenue, “With exclusive spiritual content on Shubh TV, we aspire to attract more advertising and create a better model for this genre” informs Pittie.

    ‘Shubh TV’ is also following the trend of launching an exclusive app. The app will be available for both android and iOS users.

    The live telecast slots will generally be available from 10.30 AM to 1.30 AM. The channel will follow  the 3 hour slot model. The other prime time slot will be from 6.00 AM – 10:00 AM.

    The group has many more launches in its pipeline,  “We are also planning to launch Shubh Cinema in near future which will air spiritual and patriotic movies,” confirms Pittie. 

    If sources are to be believed a Music channel is also on the cards.

  • Pittie group to launch a new spiritual TV offering in Shubh TV

    Pittie group to launch a new spiritual TV offering in Shubh TV

    MUMBAI: The divine world in television is set to witness one more addition as chairman of Pittie group, Krishan Kumar Pittie  will launch a spiritual channel ‘Shubh TV tomorrow (8 April 2016).

    The channel will initially be present on DTH platforms Dish TV and DD free dish, but has plans of expanding its distribution in near future “We are starting with Dish TV and DD free dish but in next six months we plan to launch on all DTH platforms,” says  Krishan Kumar Pittie.     

    The channel will be airing lectures by prominent spiritual speakers from across the country and will also be featuring spiritual events. Its key focus in the beginning will be on the much talked ‘Kumbh’ which will host pilgrims from across the country starting next month.

     “We are pleased to announce our new venture in spiritual channels Shubh TV,” says the chairman.

    The sector has very little advertising happening on it and hence slot selling remains the key revenue generator. The new channel will also focus on slot selling, but at the same time will strive for better advertisement revenue, “With exclusive spiritual content on Shubh TV, we aspire to attract more advertising and create a better model for this genre” informs Pittie.

    ‘Shubh TV’ is also following the trend of launching an exclusive app. The app will be available for both android and iOS users.

    The live telecast slots will generally be available from 10.30 AM to 1.30 AM. The channel will follow  the 3 hour slot model. The other prime time slot will be from 6.00 AM – 10:00 AM.

    The group has many more launches in its pipeline,  “We are also planning to launch Shubh Cinema in near future which will air spiritual and patriotic movies,” confirms Pittie. 

    If sources are to be believed a Music channel is also on the cards.

  • Patanjali continues TV ad blitz in Feb 2016; spends Rs 20 crore

    Patanjali continues TV ad blitz in Feb 2016; spends Rs 20 crore

    MUMBAI: It’s got ambition: turn Indian prime minister Narendra Modi’s dream of ‘make in India’ a reality. The Swami Ramdev-Acharya Balkrishna-founded Patanjali Yogpeeth & Divya Mandir Trust has launched a slew of fast moving consumer goods products over the past couple of years, set up vast and deep distribution channels reaching them into every nook and corner of rural – and now spreading into urban –  India. Beginning first with ayurvedic products, it moved into cateogries  like toothpaste, ghee, oil, noodles, soap, shampoo, biscuits and what have you dominated by multinationals like Hindustan Lever, Prctor and Gamble, Colgate Palmolive. And it has been making the big boys nervous, slowly chewing away impressive market shares in almost every category.  Revenues are slated to touch Rs 5,000 crore this year and Rs 20,000 crore over the next three years.

    It is backing its onward march with a massive advertising warchest  over the past year, emerging as the top spender on television, a position it continued to retain in the period 11 February 2016 to 11 March 2016.

    According to data that indiantelevision.com has obtained, the brand gave out out checks of close to Rs 28 crores on television ads in this period,  without considering the discounts it has enjoyed on individual deals. As per several industry experts, if one were to take these discounts into account, the guesstimated figure is close to Rs 20 crore.

    What is interesting to note is that unlike most of its rivals,  the genre that Patanjali spends most on is news channels, be it regional  or national news, instead of Hindi GECs. The brand used 65.5 percent of its total television advertising spends on news channels, followed by Hindi GECs with 29.89 per cent and 3.89 percent on regional entertainment channels. The brand also shells out 0.76 per cent or Rs 15 lakhs of its advertisisng spends on its in-house spiritual channel Aastha TV.

    “Going by its advertising spends in the media, Patanjali is going with media differentiation as a strategy. A lot of FMCG brands invest in soft programming which mostly comes down to the GEC sector. When everyone is in one sector, it is good to differentiate oneself and take another positioning,” explained veteran brand consultant and business strategist Harish Bijoor.

    “Secondly”, Bijoor noted,” news is the new entertainment. As a genre, it has changed from simple reporting of facts to what we call news entertainment. If you look at the television debates today, they are often pitted against highly rated entertainment shows, and therefore have larger audiences these days. Not only do you have the men watching, but women also enjoy this new variation of entertainment. Therefore I think Patanjali is playing smart by being visible on the news space.”

    In the Hindi GEC space, it spent close to Rs 1.8 crore on Star Plus, followed by Rs 1.5 core on Sony Entertainment Television and Rs 1 crore on Zee TV approximately. However, the brand buys inventory from most number of channels under Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (ZEEL).

    Patanjali has a good presence in the regional entertainment market as well, with Zee Kannada leading others in the genre in terms of Ad EX from the brand.

    As per Broadcast Audience Research Council India’s ‘Top 10 Brands’ report, the Patanjali brand has bagged as many as 21,751 insertions in week 10, followed by Colgate with 15,553 television ad insertions. One can easily see the clear lead that Pantanjali commands over the second in the list. While the brand’s investment is definitely a leading factor for its growing visibility on both TV and the shelves, careful and strategic media buying is also to be credited for its continued domination of television space. The Patanjali group has given part of its media buying mandate to Delhi based agency Vermillion Communications, and if reports by industry insiders are to be believed, there are two other local agencies that work with Patanjali.

    A late entrant to India’s Fast Moving Consumer Goods market with a wide number of retailable products, Patanjali has quickly moved on to go head on with market leaders such as Parle. The brand’s quick rise to fame, at least can be attributed to its aggressive direct marketing strategy and strong distribution reach, thanks to its retail deal with the Future Group.

    Patanjali branded products were already selling well before it decided to invest heavily in TV ads. A media expert close to the development said, “The products were selling a lot already, even before the brand was well known in the media space. But for sure this strong media presence has given the brand a very good exposure, and its sales must have augmented as well. It clearly shows that the brand is aiming for a multi-fold growth.”

    Lauding Patanjali’s  effort in going aggressive with its TV buying, Bijoor cautioned, “I think other brands need to be worried of this late entrant. Not only does it have a very hard working product and an excellent distribution network, its recent entry into advertising spends clearly shows it is reaching for the top.”

    Several industry veterans however beg to differ. Dentsu Aegis Network South Asia CEO and chairman Ashish Bhasin said, “I don’t think Patanjali poses a serious worry for other players in the category. In the FMCG business, they have plans for every competitor. Hypothetically, if there were five competitors for an FMCG brand earlier, now they have one more to consider and marketers will plan accordingly. ”

    When asked if spending huge advertising money will work in the brand’s favour in the long run. Bhasin replied, “The brand has definitely spent a significant amount on television in the past few months. Whether it will sustain the same throughout the year is hard to say. It is understandable for a brand launching itself and trying to build a quick presence for itself to spend in the tried and trusted media. It is too early to say how long its continued dominance of the television space will work out for it.”

    Bhasin isn’t the only one who voices uncertainty about Patanjali continuing with its chart topping spending spree in the coming months. A veteran media player under condition of anonymity opined, “I think Patanjali’s current trend of buying TV ad slots aggressively will go down in a month. It had the gall when it entered media marketing with its aggressive strategy, the brand has achieved that, and I don’t think it has a reason to continue the same spends on television.”

    Other media observers state that the Patanjali group is working to a plan. “The foot on the advertising pedal is not going to be eased,” sas a source very close to the group. “Patanjali’s marketing mavens are  going to move into more clever and refined media buying as it starts  rolling out its products in even more kirana stores and large outlets in urban and suburban India. Both Swamiji and Acharyaji want to create a mutli-product giant competing with long established players, and for that aggressive marketing, distribution and advertising will have to continue.”

    Whether Patanjali continues to spend tens of crores per month or not, the presence of such an aggressive spender among the advertisers definitely augurs well for TV advertising as a whole – and news channels in particular.