Tag: Technical Committee

  • BARC Update

    BARC Update

    The BARC Board met today to evaluate the Technology options and decide on the road ahead.  It was recognized that BARC has the opportunity to change the paradigm and the solution should last for the next 15 to 20 years.

     

    The Board agrees that there is a quantum jump in technology that is being envisaged. Considerable progress has been made in identifying suitable cutting edge technologies available for measurement of present and future Broadcast distribution platforms. The Board decided to authorize the BARC Technical Committee and the Management to initiate pilots with these solutions to assess the suitability in Indian conditions.

  • Evaluation of RFPs for BARC to be held from 14 August

    Evaluation of RFPs for BARC to be held from 14 August

    NEW DELHI: The Evaluation Panel of the Technical Committee of the Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) will meet from 14 to 17 August in the hill station of Lonavla (close to Mumbai) to evaluate the responses to the Requests for Proposal (RFPs) received from 27 organisations. BARC had earlier received a total of 32 requests from different technology and research organisations for joining the process of television viewership monitoring. The committee has accepted 27 of these. Two of them – one technical and the other research – will make it to the finishing line.

     

    “Some parties may have responded to both RFPs. Some may have sent in only the technical or research RFP,” says BARC principal provocateur/advisor Paritosh Joshi.

     

    Joshi, who represents the broadcasters’ interests in the 12-member technical committee in BARC adds that “The entire evaluation process would be completed by November and the names of the two parties would be made public by December.”

     

    BARC hopes to commence sending out television viewing audience research reports by the summer of next year. “We expect that in the first phase, the number of households will go up from the present 10,000 to 20,000, ensuring a proper balance of rural and urban areas,” he adds.

     

    The present intention of the committee is to develop studies every six months. “But this can vary with time,” he informs.

     

    BARC as part of its endeavour to share the latest updates with all constituents hosted its open house today in New Delhi. This was the second of the series of interactions that BARC plans to hold. Approximately 70 people representing the broadcasters, advertisers and agencies attended the meet.

     

    Addressing the meet, Joshi stressed that BARC would not be a research body but a development organisation, He also updated the participants on the work done so far, the work planned, and a wish list of things that BARC hopes to achieve in the future.

     

    BARC has claimed that this was one of the largest tender ever floated for audience measurement anywhere in the world. The tender terms state that each vendor has to work with whomsoever BARC wants it to work with. This is to ensure system integration, keeping in mind the involvement of multiple vendors.

     

    “We are attempting to move from active metering where individuals are given people’s meters to passive metering where technologies like apps or even cameras inbuilt in TV sets and other devices will be used. Technology will now play a major part since television viewing is no longer confined to TV sets but to tablets, computers, fablets, mobiles and so on,” informs Joshi.

     

    BARC has made it clear in its RFPs’ that it wanted a screen and technology agnostic measurement. “BARC wants to minimise human intervention in processing data,” reveals Joshi.

     

    While the attempt is to report audience research on a weekly basis, BARC has recognised that there are some channels that could not be reported on a weekly basis, and so these channels can be reported quarterly. “BARC will give unduplicated quarterly reach since there is no other number available for these channels,” he informs.

     

    Currently an establishment study is underway which covers 2.4 lakh households. For this, BARC has used the census of India and electoral rolls, since there was no other database available.

     

    Clarifying the role of the technical committee, Joshi said, “Besides evaluation of the proposals for the new audience measurement system, the BARC technical committee will carry out due-diligence exercises on a regular basis once data starts flowing. Since audience measurement research is not stationary, it is evolving continuously; the technical committee will drive the evolution.”

     

    The technical committee is autonomous of the BARC board. “The technical committee decides what the research needs. For the board to override a decision that the technical committee has made requires it to have a 75 per cent majority,” he says.

     

    Referring to his wish list, Joshi hopes that the studies are cloud-based with broadcast data available on apps.

  • BARC begins nationwide roadshow with Bengaluru

    BARC begins nationwide roadshow with Bengaluru

    BENGALURU: In what was the first of four to five open houses that BARC intends to hold in India, the apex body shared details about the way forward at Bengaluru last week. Principal Provocateur/Advisor Paritosh Joshi, who represents the broadcasters interests in the 12 member technical committee on BARC spoke at length about the council’s plans on the new audience measurement system. In attendance were about 100 professionals from the broadcast and ad ecosystem, and BARC CEO Partho Dasgupta and VP Mubin Khan.

     

    Some of the points that were clarified at the Bengaluru Open House include:

     

    For what is said to be the largest tender ever floated for audience measurement anywhere in the world, BARC has received expressions of interest from significantly big technology companies that wish to be a part of the tender. The tender terms state that each vendor would have to work with whomsoever BARC wants it to work with. “Since multiple vendors are likely to be involved, system integration was crucial and there was a possibility of a blame game when something didn’t work out,” Joshi said, explaining why BARC will play a pivotal role.

     

    Of the 32 expressions of interest, 27 companies from across the world had been asked to submit proposals. Because of the huge diversity of devices on which television style content could be consumed, TV content was now more and more agnostic to screen as well as time. Consumption of TV and television type content was not only being space-shifted, but also time-shifted. BARC has made it clear in its RFPs’ that it wanted a screen and technology agnostic measurement.

     

    BARC expects to complete the awarding of contracts by end September or early October and the new ratings system could be out by the summer of 2014.

     

    Value added reselling of data is another possibility for the future. As much of the process that can be automated will be automated – simply because BARC wants to minimise human intervention.

     

    The ratings body has not yet fixed periodicity of dispensing data because it would vary within the structure of the sample. Joshi explained, “Based on the current situation and sample size, probably getting weekly data is all that could be possible initially. This is not an emotive issue of weekly, fortnightly or quarterly reporting, BARC would look at the data and decide. It must be remembered that the higher the frequency that one seeks, the larger the sample size must become to be able to find statistically significant sized audiences. BARC recognises that there are some channels that we cannot report on a weekly basis, and so these channels could be reported quarterly, BARC will give unduplicated quarterly reach since there is no other number available for these channels.”

     

    Explaining how BARC picked up the establishment study size, Joshi said, “The most critical element of an audience measurement system is defining the establishment and the way people and the type of people (the consumer classification) who consume television. The establishment study which is already in the field will help BARC to prioritise and enable it to determine the segments of the population that are important and cannot be missed. To pick up a sampling size of 2.4 lakh for the establishment study, BARC used the census of India and electoral rolls, since there was no other database available, maybe in the future Aadhar could be used to provide a sampling frame. The establishment study will essentially run continuously, BARC will be able to re-estimate the underlying universe with far higher frequency than has probably been done until now.”

     

    “One of the big things that BARC is working with the RFPs is that it is defining what the relative error is, what the confidence is. Today the stakeholders are not aware about what the relative errors or the confidence of the numbers are. They are working with the numbers as if they were the absolute truth, which they aren’t. BARC will define the statistical boundaries within which the numbers are to be interpreted. Numbers that don’t fall within those bounds will not be reported,” said Joshi.

     

    Clarifying the role of the technical committee, Joshi said, “Besides evaluation of the proposals for the new audience measurement system, the BARC technical committee will carry out due-diligence exercises on a regular basis once data starts flowing. Since audience measurement research is not stationary, it is evolving continuously, the technical committee will drive the evolution.”

     

    “The technical committee is autonomous of the BARC board. The BARC board cannot decide what the technical committee does. The technical committee decides what the research needs. For the board to override a decision that the TechCom has made requires it to have a 75 per cent majority. 60 per cent of the voting share at BARC is with the broadcasters and 20 per cent each with the advertisers and the agencies,” explained Joshi further.

     

    Throwing light on what the BARC was not, Joshi said, “People somehow feel that BARC will replace TAM. That now you have TAM and later you’ll have BARC. TAM Media is a for-profits research venture. In the current scheme of things it is a vendor owned vendor managed system. We don’t know much about establishment study that they do, they do issue a summary every year, but they don’t tell you the details of the study. BARC is not a research company and it will never be a research company. It is a joint industry body that will be designing, commissioning, supervising and owning India’s broadcast audience research. That does not mean that it will be conducting that research itself. BARC commissions research which means that somebody else will actually conduct it. Therefore BARC is not a replacement of TAM. TAM could be potentially a vendor to BARC as could be a whole series of other kinds of companies and various other sorts of entities.”

     

    Sharing details about the new systems that were in place globally, Joshi said, “In the UK and some European countries, Canada and US, in Japan inventory is being sold on the basis of VOSDAL+7 (Viewed on Same Day as Live) – seven days of audience data are cumulated to actually determine the ratings for a show and this will grow as currency in other parts of the world. So you’re not only measuring the primary TV consumption, but also in all other forms. BARC may not be able to measure it at the start, but it should be able to do so in a year and a half from now.”

  • FFI decides to boycott the IFFI 2012 for being ignored at every stage

    FFI decides to boycott the IFFI 2012 for being ignored at every stage

    New Delhi: The Film Federation of India, the apex body of the film industry, has decided to boycott all activities of the International Film Festival of India in Goa in November to protest it being by-passed and not being called to any Steering and other committee meetings.

    In fact, it was informed about the Industry Coordination Committee meeting as late as August-end by which time some major discussions that are normally taken at this meeting had already been taken by the Directorate of Film Festivals and IFFI Secretariat.

    FFI at its annual general meeting late last week in Mumbai where members from all over India were present unanimously decided that the federation will not participate in any of the activities of IFFI.
     
    FFI has always been an essential component of the Steering Committee and its members actively involved in various other committees and sub-committees such as theatre, technical, hospitality and others. But this has not happened in recent years and ‘FFI can only assume that either the committees have been discontinued or FFI has been kept out of them.‘

    According to FFI President Vinod Lamba, ‘it is now learnt that DFF has already taken all major decisions without calling for any joint meeting, or holding any discussions with the FFI; or even informing FFI.‘

    In fact, in 2011, the time-honoured tradition of the vote of thanks being delivered by the FFI President at the IFFI opening had been done away with at the level of the DFF ‘with no proper and timely information being conveyed formally to the Information & Broadcasting Ministry or FFI.‘

    Lamba added, ‘While this callous misadventure may appear to have been nipped in the bud and status quo restored, the deliberate mishandling of affairs at the inauguration event itself conveyed a greater affront to the persona and position of the FFI President, prompting the Minister (Mrs Ambika Soni) herself to rush on stage to take corrective action.‘

    The IFFI by its very tenets is a festival held jointly by the government and the Indian film industry, and FFI being the apex body of the industry ‘has been playing their part with total sincerity and efficiency.‘

    However, the same cannot be said of the Directorate of Film Festivals which has been persistently neglecting and slighting the FFI, in all matters that were once decided jointly.

    Talking to indiantelevision.com, Lamba added that despite an assurance of remedial action, it seems that the insensitiveness seems to have gathered strength; instead of involving the FFI and through it the industry from the early stages, it seems that the DFF/IFFI Secretariat is bent on sidelining the industry in the major decision making processes, reaching out to it only in times of dire need of correcting embarrassing foul ups. At the same time, he stressed that FFI has never shied away from providing assistance.

    Expressing surprise at the decision, IFFI Director Shankar Mohan told indiantelevision.com that he had been in constant touch with the film industry and it was erroneous to say they had been kept out. There has been constant coordination with the FFI, the Film and Television Producers Guild, and the Confederation of Cine Employees.

    He added that only two committees had been formed this year – the Steering Committee and a Technical Committee.

    He said he had been personally trying for the last month to arrange a meeting of the Industry Coordination Committee, but had failed to get a response.