Tag: Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corp

  • ARASU to pay deficit of Rs 138.7 cr to SPNI as per DAS audit : TDSAT order

    ARASU to pay deficit of Rs 138.7 cr to SPNI as per DAS audit : TDSAT order

    Mumbai: In a landmark ruling, the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSA) has directed Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corp (TACTV) to pay Rs 138.75 cr to Sony Pictures Networks India (SPNI) for underreporting the subscriber base as revealed in the DAS audit, leading to financial loss to the broadcaster.

    The amount needs to be paid within two months from the issued order (16 February), said the Tribunal, posting the matter for further proceedings on 9 March. As per the order, the amount is 50 per cent of the original claim amount of Rs 277.58 cr sought by the broadcaster in its petition before the Tribunal in May 2021.

    According to the guidelines of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) pertaining to the NTO regime 2019, all distribution platform operators (DPOs) are required to conduct a Digital Addressable Audit (DAS) audit of their head-ends mandatorily once in a calendar year. The DPOs can choose any of the empanelled auditors listed by Trai for the purpose. In case of any DPO not conducting such audits, the broadcaster can conduct the same via the empanelled auditors for the said calendar year.

    In its petition before the Tribunal, SPNI had stated that TACTV ARASU had been consistently postponing the DAS audit. Despite several reminders by the SPNI distribution team, the distributor kept postponing the audit till November 2020 citing the Covid situation. Finally, the audit was done by the Trai empanelled audit agency- BDO India LLP in December 2020. As per the audit procedures, all the data extraction was done by the ARASU representatives along with the CAS/ SMS vendors in front of the auditors.

    The Auditors submitted the findings and reports to both ARASU and SPNI on 19 January 2021, which on careful analysis revealed that seven ARASU packs that had SPNI channels were not disclosed in the monthly subscriber reports (MSR’s) submitted to SPNI. “This amounts to piracy and under declaration of sub-bases led to a revenue impact for SPNI,” the broadcaster argued.

    Further, a close analysis of the CAS data recovered from 19 February till November 2020 revealed that two packs out of undisclosed seven packs carrying SPNI channels were available to the entire universe of 2.8 million subscribers of ARASU and again, none of these numbers was disclosed to SPNI in the Monthly MSR’s. According to the broadcaster, this has resulted in a huge financial accumulated outstanding impact month on month amounting to a value of Rs. 277.52 Crores, unpaid by ARASU.

    After receiving no response from ARASU despite several reminders, SPNI approached TDAST in May 2021 and submitted the entire case and a prayer for a hearing and resolution on this matter. After prolonged arguments and counter-arguments by the SPNI counsel represented by senior advocate Gopal Jain and Kunal Tandon, the Tribunal was convinced that ARASU has been underreporting the subscriber base due to which SPNI’s legitimate rightful monthly fee accrual was way below the actual rightful amount.

    “If 50 per cent of the amount indicated above is paid within two months, the petitioner (SPNI) shall not issue disconnection notice without seeking leave of the Tribunal,” the order stated.

  • Arasu DAS licence: Stakeholders fear flurry of similar requests & permissions

    NEW DELHI: Even as Tamil Nadu state government-backed MSO Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corp (TACTV) expressed satisfaction at getting the DAS license after “five years of struggle”, some other stakeholders felt this move by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting may go against a policy recommendations by sector regulator TRAI and, possibly, open up floodgates for similar requests from other local governments.

    TACTV general manager Ramana Saraswathi, while welcoming the development, told indiantelevision.com that the matter about shuttering analogue signals within three months was something that the state government would decide.

    She said that TACTV would await government instructions. Incidentally, the state government in Tamil Nadu state is an ally of the BJP-led NDA coalition that is in power in New Delhi.

    While officially analog has had a sunset on 31 March 2017 in India, MIB’s internal review of the ground situation revealed that full digital play is yet to be a reality. The Andhra Pradesh state government, meanwhile, had exhorted MIB to extend the March 2017 deadline, which had received no official feedback from MIB.

    However, not everybody was as upbeat as Arasu. Most MSOs and LCOs outside Tamil Nadu, contacted by indiantelevision.com, made clear their apprehension saying this might “open the floodgates” and “other state governments may take advantage” of this by regularising or floating MSO companies, which will indirectly help politicians control what all gets aired and what all people can watch.

    One Andhra-based MSO said that an inter-ministerial committee had itself held that the matter was one of policy that should be decided by the MIB. LCO Sky Vision managing director R S Raju said that when TRAI has submitted a series of recommendations on why government or semi-government bodies should not be allowed in TV distribution business, which are awaiting a final decision at MIB, such permissions, conditional or otherwise, send a wrong signal to the industry players.

    Saharsh Damani of the All India Digital Cable Federation (AIDCF) said the organization would study the government order in detail and then give an official reaction.

    In August 2014, TRAI had suggested barring political parties from entering into broadcasting space, while it recommended several restrictions on the corporate houses in this regard.  It had made a similar recommendation in December 2012 and earlier in November 2008.

    “Ownership is a huge concern… how do you know that a TV channel operated out of Bhopal owned by a local MLA or MP is conveying the truth rather than tinted version of the truth. This is one problem with political ownership,” the then TRAI chairman Rahul Khullar had said in 2014 while releasing recommendations on ‘Issues Relating to Media Ownership’.

    TRAI had suggested that entities, including political bodies, religious bodies, central and state government ministries and government funded entities be barred from entry into broadcasting and TV channel distribution sectors.

    The regulator even suggested that surrogates of such entities too “should be barred”.

    TRAI had pushed for enactment of a new legislation through an executive decision for its recommendations to be implemented, while suggesting an exit option should be provided in case permission to any such organizations had already been granted.

    Arasu’s conditional license makes things that much more difficult for MIB and other central government department to take a final decision on the regulator’s suggestions.

    ALSO READ:

    Arasu gets provisional MSO license subject to analogue switch-off in three months

    Can a MSO block a channel airing unfavourable poll survey?

    DAS: MSOs, LCOs give low figure of STB seeding, official sources admit it’s under 80%

  • 106 MSOs registered says Javadekar; Arasu application under review

    106 MSOs registered says Javadekar; Arasu application under review

    MUMBAI: The government is doing well in the area of registering multi system operators (MSOs), especially in those areas where digitization has been implemented. This was stated by information & broadcasting minister Prakash Javadekar in a written reply in th Rajya  Sabha. He revealed that 106  MSOs have  have been granted permanent registrations by his ministry to enable them to operate in digital addressable system (DAS) zones.

     

    He added that the I&B ministry had received a letter from the Tamil Nadu chief minister J Jayalalithaa to also register the government run MSO the Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corp  Ltd to allow it to operate in the DAS notified areas of the southern state.

     

    He disclosed that his ministry was examining Arasu’s application in the light of the TRAI’s recommendations regarding the entry of government entities in the broadcasting and distribution activities.

     

    The TRAI has been consistent in its stand that state government entities should not be allowed to enter the business of broadcasting and distribution of TV channels. It had made these recommendations in its paper on Issues related to entry of certain entities into Broadcasting and Distribution Activities in December 2012, and reiterated them in its consultation paper on monopoly/market dominance in cable TV in June 2013.