Tag: TAM

  • TAM’s moment of truth

    TAM’s moment of truth

    MUMBAI: The Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (MIB) has finally put its stamp on the TV rating guidelines and the government order is already out on the Ministry’s website for all those who want to read it. The bottomline of the ratings order coming out is that TAM has to shape up or ship out.

     

    As per the TV rating guidelines which were given the cabinet’s nod last week, TAM has to work a miracle to meet them in the time frame that it has been given. There are several guidelines, but the most challenging appear to be ownership and expanding the people meter sample to 20,000. That too in a ultra slim  period of just 29 days if it wants to continue to be in the business.

     

    According to a highly placed industry source, TAM’s stakeholders will have to meet sooner than later to decide on what its next course of action should be. “It is a major decision it has to take: whether to take on the might of the law and the government; its move will have to be very calculated,” says the source.

     

    Industry insiders think that TAM’s options have narrowed down further as compared to earlier when it was playing the waiting game; waiting to see if the MIB will pursue and pass the order. Today it has two choices: either it approaches the court for some relief and gets a stay on MIB’s diktat, which will give it some more time to try and fulfill the guidelines; or, it will have to wind up its business, which is not going to be easy, considering how much it has invested in ratings, and the number of staffers on its rolls.

     

    The Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) had met the Ministry on Thursday, 16 January to update it on the progress it is making. However, the Council also tabled a request in front of the Ministry to allow TAM to exist till BARC is ready. That’s because with TAM on the blink in 29 days, there will be no ratings till October 2014, when BARC says its ratings will be up and running.

     

    The industry has been pushing TAM to go to court to get the stay; but it seemed reluctant to move ahead then. Now, with the time bomb ticking away, the urging from industry will only get stronger.

     

    Whether the ratings agency will move ahead on industry’s goading is a big question mark: its CEO LV Krishnan is sure to have memories of the caning he has been getting from broadcasters over the years. They have always complained TAM ratings are suspect; even as recently as last year, a bunch of them took him to the cleaners, threatening to shut off the subscription pipe to it. Advertisers and agencies kind of stood by him, but he had to face most of the flak.

     

    Will LVK do it this time too when TAM’s moment of truth has arrived?

  • MIB issues order on guidelines for TV rating agencies

    MIB issues order on guidelines for TV rating agencies

    MUMBAI: The clock has started ticking as of yesterday, 16 January, when the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) passed its order regarding TV rating guidelines. The ‘policy guidelines for television rating agencies in India’ have been issued by the Ministry after the cabinet approved it on 9 January.

     

    The guidelines will come into effect thirty days from the date of issuance of the order. Current rating agency TAM now has 29 days left to bring the guidelines into effect and comply with it.

     

    Attached below is the full annexure of the guidelines.

     

    Click here to read the annexure

     

    Await detailed report…

     

    Click here to read the earlier report

  • TV ratings: Ownership & FDI questions

    TV ratings: Ownership & FDI questions

    MUMBAI: To have foreign direct investment (FDI) in TV ratings or not, that is the question. And the recently-cleared TV ratings guidelines by the Cabinet Committee of Economic Affairs (CCEA) have brought this to the fore by their silence on this score. While announcing that the CCEA had given the go ahead to the ministry of  information and broadcasting (MIB) last week to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)-recommended  guidelines for a regulatory framework for TV ratings in India,  minister Manish Tewari had this to say.

     

    “In so far as FDI is concerned we would make a separate reference to TRAI with regard to the quantum and need of FDI that should be permitted in ratings agencies. After the TRAI recommendations, the question of allowing FDI would be looked at. So as we speak, no FDI will be permitted in TV ratings agencies till we don’t have a recommendation on it.”

     

    Although the 2013 recommendations do not have any mention of FDI, it is noteworthy to point out that TRAI’s 2008 consultation paper on TV ratings does. The paper says that stakeholders feel that FDI should be restricted to 20 per cent in a TV ratings agency.  It also goes on to suggest that since no security issues were involved and little or no competition was prevailing (only two agencies existed at that time – TAM and aMap  and no regulation existed), that it would be okay of no if no FDI limit was imposed.  “Generally FDI encourages world class technology and international best practices,” TRAI had stated in the paper.

     

    So even as the TRAI was of the opinion that FDI was all right in 2008, in 2013 it gave the issue an ignore. Currently FDI limits for broadcasters are 100 per cent  for non-news and current affairs channels, for news channels 26 per cent, for cable TV 74 per cent, for DTH 49 per cent, for print 26 per cent for general news etc.

     

    Tewari stated that the question of FDI would be looked at after the TV ratings guidelines are notified by the ministry. Could the earlier recommendation of 20 per cent work as a guideline today? Or is the government going to be averse to FDI totally?

     

    Let us take a look at the other major guideline of cross holding in the TV ratings provider. The guideline states very clearly:  ‘No single company/legal entity either directly or through its associates or interconnect undertakings shall have substantial equity holding that is, 10 per cent or more of paid up equity in both rating agencies and broadcasters/advertisers/advertising agencies.’

     

    If one looks at the holding pattern of Mediametrie – the French ratings agency – which is soon to be announced as the Broadcast Audience Research Council’s (BARC’s) ratings partner,  France Televisions holds 22.89 per cent equity in it, TF1  10.8 per cent, Radio France 13.5 per cent and Union des Annonceurs 11.77 per cent.

     

    France Televisions in turn owns 49 per cent of TV5 Monde while AEF (formerly called France Monde) that runs France 24 owns 12.6 per cent of France Televisions. Quite a convoluted holding structure, but clearly one where broadcasters could be owning more than 10 per cent equity in the TV ratings provider.

     

    However, BARC officials are quick to clarify that it is BARC which will be providing the ratings and not Mediametrie. The latter is only a technology supplier and ratings are being outsourced to it. It owns no equity in the ratings company which is BARC. Hence, the question of more than 10 per cent equity ownership by broadcasters in Mediametrie is irrelevant and there will be no violation of TRAI’s guidelines, they emphasise.

     

    BARC, on its part is a non-profit organisation under section 25 of the Companies Act, with nominated representatives from the Indian Broadcasting Foundation, Indian Society of Advertisers, and Advertising Agencies Association of India. In a response to TRAI’s consultation paper, BARC had stated that even though the three may have conflicting interests in the ratings process, its articles of incorporation clearly state that “each has an equal voice in the design, and monitoring of the rating system, and in the administration of BARC, irrespective of the funding pattern.”

     

    TAM, on the other hand, has woes on both fronts as it not only does not comply with the FDI guidelines it also is has issues on the cross holding guideline as it is owned jointly by the WPP group and AC Nielsen. It is even listed on the WPP site as one of its companies.

     

    The key question that everyone is asking at the time of writing is whether TAM Media will move court against the guidelines, as they have come into force so many years after it has been operating in India with the equity and cross holding structures that it has. Or will it give up the fight and pack up just like Coca-Cola did in the seventies, when the government ordered it to reduce the FDI in it to 40 per cent.

  • What now for TV ratings and TAM

    What now for TV ratings and TAM

    MUMBAI: When the cabinet committee on economic affairs announced that it had approved the Telecom Regulatory of India (TRAI) recommendations on TV ratings guidelines in the first week of  2014 the first question that struck everyone was – what will TAM do now?

     

    The fracas between angry broadcasters and TAM has been brewing for  several years and finally came to its boiling point last year when seven TV networks announced that they were clicking on the TAM TV rating unsubscribe button. This put a big question mark over TAM’s very existence but it managed to get out of the corner it was in by hammering out a solution which was acceptable to most subscribers. 

     

    As far as the current threat to TAM’s continuance is concerned, the Cabinet’s go ahead to the proposed regulatory framework has now to be notified. When that will happen no one knows, though speculation is that it could be sooner than later. However, what is sure is that TAM will have 30 days from notification date to comply with its guidelines and then seek a licence from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB).  From all angles it looks like a pressure cooker-like situation that the TV ratings provider has landed itself in. 

     

    Broadcasters seem to be the happiest of the lot. NDTV group CEO Vikram Chandra – whose company sued TAM in a New York court two years ago – is cock-a-hoop with delight that the government has affirmed what industry has been voicing since nearly six to seven years: that TAM and the ratings process in India needs to be spruced up.

     

    “The introduction of firm guidelines is a positive step as everything is clear now. It shows that we should never be hesitant to change something that isn’t right,” says Chandra.

     

    Whether TAM will manage to find the capital to ramp up its peoplemeter sample to 20,000 within a month or two is something that is concerning industry. What is also a big question mark is how the MIB will view the WPP group’s 50 per cent equity in TAM (through Kantar Media Research 20 per cent, and Cavendish Square Holdings 30 per cent), as mentioned in the NDTV suit with the supreme court in New York.

     

    “Kantar and Cavendish will have to exit since their parent is WPP. TAM has been worrisome and everyone has realised it. So now it has just two options, either shape up or ship out,” says a senior news broadcaster from the News Broadcasters Association (NBA).

     

    However, a source from the IBF presents another option. “We are a democratic country so the government cannot force things on anybody. TAM has the freedom to go to the court and appeal against the guidelines,” says the source.

     

     If TAM decides to oppose the guidelines and go to court and gets a stay order, then we might see some delays in the roll out of the guidelines. This will allow it to continue to operate until a final decision is given by the court, thus buying it some time. Additionally, the industry-backed Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) will also get some time to get its act together with the minimum 20,000 meters.

     

    Media agencies and advertisers aren’t too happy with the way the cabinet has thrust the deadline on TAM.

     

    Says a senior media professional:  “In the beginning of cable and satellite TV in India in the nineties, we had TAM and INTAM. The latter could not sustain itself and TAM continued. Then we had TAM and aMap in the mid of the previous decade. aMap too found the going tough without full industry support and folded up. The fact is TAM has started from scratch and survived so many upheavals. It is a sad situation to be destroying something that has been existing and running for so long. ”

     

    However, she is clutching on to a thin sliver of hope that TAM and BARC could co-exist for a while until things smooth out on the ratings front. 

     

    “The time given to follow and make all the changes as per the guidelines is impractical,” says Madison World chairman & MD Sam Balsara. “It is obvious that TAM will not be able to handle it all at such a short notice.”

     

    The Indian Society of Advertisers (ISA) chairman Hemant Bakshi says that he is discussing the consequences of the cabinet’s clearance to the new ratings guidelines with major advertisers and other players to gauge the possible impact on their businesses.

     

    One scenario that everyone is dreading is that TAM fails to comply with all the requirements within the time period it is given, and the courts dismiss its appeal, if it makes one. Will it then be forced to cease operations immediately and lead to a ratings-less period for the Indian television business? This is extremely alarming for all concerned.

     

    IPG Mediabrands CEO Shashi Sinha who is also in the technical committee of BARC feels that the management of the new proposed ratings system needs to pull their socks up, and accelerate the rollout of people meters. But even then he says that “we are hoping to be on our feet and start functioning only by September/October.”

     

    That seems a long, long time away, going by how things are moving. Madison’s Balsara is quite clear on the way forward. Says he: “As an industry we need ratings, all the time! Therefore, till BARC comes up, we need an alternate. As an industry we should appeal to the ministry to relax the deadline for the implementation.”

     

    Hence, it is imperative for all concerned – whether it is the MIB led by Manish Tewari, the government, TAM, the ISA, advertising agencies, broadcasters and BARC – to choose their next steps wisely.

     

  • TRAI releases its 2013 report card

    TRAI releases its 2013 report card

    MUMBAI: The year 2013 saw the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) cracking its whip on the broadcasters as well as every other party within the industry for its betterment. It released several papers and regulations in order to do so. The Regulator that released its activity report for the year gone by as the New Year kicked off, said that consumer interest has been one of its main mandates.

    To ensure good consumer experience, in 2013, TRAI amended ‘standards of quality of service (duration of ads in TVs)” of 2004. And what came into effect was the regulation that restricts advertising air time to 12 minutes for a clock hour. The regulator says that this practice is not uncommon in several countries and also goes along with the provisions of the Cable TV Network Rules (1994). “Excessive advertisement adversely affects the quality of viewing experience of the consumer. The objective behind the issue of these regulations was to ensure a better quality of experience for the consumer,” says the TRAI’s activity paper.

    But even after this amendment, not all the broadcasters have been following it and the current fate of the ad cap is in a limbo. Several broadcasters have even challenged it in the Delhi High Court including the News Broadcasters Association (NBA). When channels openly did not follow the rule, TRAI started prosecuting them for it. Complaints were filed against 14 broadcasters for non compliance with the regulation. With this, TRAI disappointed many channels as the regulation came at a time when advertising rates were dipping and digitisation had not even entered phase II.

    TRAI also came up with The Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services Tariff Orders for cable TV and DTH services that provides standard tariff packs for supply and installation of STBs to consumers in DAS areas and Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) to DTH consumers.

    When India’s oldest DTH operator, Dish TV went to the regulator for extension of its 10 year licence that was to expire on 30 September, it woke up to the fact there were no guidelines/rules on  extension. The new consultation paper is reportedly coming out this month and meanwhile Dish TV has been allowed to continue on its existing terms and conditions.

    The issue of media ownership was also addressed with the Regulator coming out with a consultation paper that discussed points related to ownership of a media outlet, disqualification from the media sector and rules for mergers and acquisitions in the sector. Media monopoly issues were also taken up when the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) asked TRAI to examine whether there was a requirement of restrictions on MSOs and LCOs to prevent them from monopolising cable TV markets.

    The TAM brouhaha that saw adamant broadcasters unsubscribe to its ratings system led to the TRAI coming up with its guidelines defining parameters for ratings agencies and ratings systems.

    Major steps were taken to strengthen the process of digitsation. Multi-system Operators (MSOs) and Local Cable Operators (LCOs) were ordered to bring a proper subscriber management system (SMS) in place and disconnect signals for those whose details were not entered.

    Pay TV channels were asked to have written interconnect agreements with MSOs. One of the provisions that protected broadcasters was that an MSO could not demand signals for a particular channel under the ‘must provide’ clause and ask for carriage fee.

    As India is progressing towards digitisation, a la carte channels should also be available along with packages, so that subscribers can opt for either a la carte or bouquets or a combination of both. 14 LCOs and a MSO were also taken to court for not following DAS regulations.

  • Zee TV and Sony witness a dip in Week 51

    Zee TV and Sony witness a dip in Week 51

    MUMBAI: We are almost nearing the year end and interestingly there hasn’t been much change in the TAM TV ratings through the year. However, the Week 51 has been a good week overall for the general entertainment channels (GECs) as almost all the channels have witnessed a growth in its viewership.

    As per the TVT data sourced from the channel for week 51, Star Plus remains at the first position with 599,179 GVTs (579,369). The new show on the channel Yeh Hai Mohabbatein maintains stable position with 2,836 TVTs (2,821). However, its celebrity dance reality show Nach Baliye 6 saw a drop with 3,766 TVTs (3,918). The epic series Mahabharat continues to grab eyeballs and reported 7,662 TVTs (7,412).

    Colors too maintained its second position with 488,005 GVTs (448,658). The channel has witnessed a hike in almost all its properties. While Bigg Boss seven reported 5,989 TVTs (5,706), 24 scored 3,493 TVTs (2,862) and Comedy Nights with Kapil garnered 8,818 TVTs (7,425).

    At the third position, Zee TV saw a fall in its viewership and marked 408,807 GVTs (439,271). The channel’s sitcom Bh se Bhade witnessed a drop in its viewership and reported 1,459 TVTs (2,021). Its popular dance reality show Dance India Dance 4 lost on its viewership on Saturday and scored 4,061 TVTs (6,304) and remained almost stable at 3,870 TVTs (3,821) on Sunday.

    Life OK stood at number four with 325,759 GVTs (312,956) followed by Sab with 308,658 GVTs (291,060). Sony witnessed a drop in the number of GVTs and scored 254,912 GVTs (266,525). Its non-fiction property, Boogie Woogie Kids Championship saw a drop in its second week and marked at 3,232 TVTs (3,612).

    Sahara One is still lagging behind and is at the bottom of the ratings list with 36,673 GVTs (36,001).

    In the movie channel genre, Zee Cinema reported 222,208 GVTs (208,530); Star Gold registered 163,219 GVTs (167,279) and Movies OK scored 125,734 GVTs (123,361). On the other hand, &pictures notched up and scored 79,261 GVTs (70,567), Zee Anmol marked 64,638 GVTs (65,618) and Max scored 214,123 GVTs (172,165).

  • Makeover helps Hungama hike ad rates by 25%

    Makeover helps Hungama hike ad rates by 25%

    MUMBAI: A little over two months since its makeover and Hungama TV has already upped ad rates by 25 per cent on the back of an estimated 25 per cent growth in viewership.

     

    It was in October this year that Disney UTV’s kids’ channel underwent a reboot, wherein a local flavour was imparted while keeping its ‘unapologetically fun loving, mischievous and boisterous’ character intact.

     

    The three-pronged revamp saw a new tagline Hungama Machaya Kya?, a new on-air look and packaging as well as a fresh interactive feel.

     

    The strategy seems to have worked for ever since, the channel has registered a 25 per cent growth in viewership as per TAM ratings (CS: 4-14; Mkt: HSM; Data period: Wk 1-48’13 All Days; 0700-2300 HRS, Basic TVTs, Kids Genre).

     

    Elaborating on what tipped the scales in Hungama’s favour, Disney UTV kids’ network programming director Devika Prabhu says: “Apart from the refreshed look, we now have new shows like VIR: The Robot Boy and Ninja Warriors (dubbed by Javed Jaffery). New episodes of popular shows as well as new movie titles are also in the pipeline. Hence, apart from the new look and feel, children have new and exciting things to look forward to.”

     

    Buoyed by the growth in viewership, the channel has hiked ad rates by 25 per cent and roped in advertisers the likes of Hero Honda.

     

    Says Disney UTV media network ad sales executive director Nikhil Gandhi: “Our confidence has only grown and we see ourselves in the top position very soon. And our clients too believe in it and hence have come on board even after a hike in ad rates.”

     

    “Today, the kids’ genre isn’t about kids anymore. It is all about co-viewing and hence, advertisers feel that they can target the whole family through this genre as well,” he adds.

     

    Going further, Hungama will be focusing on home-grown content. “Vir has got an excellent response from the viewers and we would like to explore and expand Indian content,” signs off Prabhu.

  • Week 50 ratings: Major GECs register a hike

    Week 50 ratings: Major GECs register a hike

    MUMBAI: In the week 50 of TAM TV ratings, Zee TV, which has reported consistent growth over the past few weeks, saw a fall in viewership. Life OK too witnessed a drop in its viewership. As for the other channels, it was a good week as they saw an increase in the ratings.

    As per the TVT data sourced from TAM subscribers for week 50, Star Plus remains at the number one position with 579 million TVTs as compared to last week’s 561 million TVTs.

    Colors reported 449 million TVTs, as compared 480 million in week 49. Zee TV slipped to the third position, seeing a decline in viewership at 439 million TVTs as compared to last week’s 456 million TVTs.

    Life OK was at number four position with a fall in the viewership and reported 313 million TVTs, as compared to 325 million TVTs last week. Sab occupied the fifth position, however the channel recorded hike in the viewership with 291 million TVTs, as compared to 261 million TVTs last week.

    Sony witnessed a growth in the viewership but still continued to occupy the number six position with 267 million TVTs, as compared to 241 million TVTs last week.

  • ‘We want to be number one. Life OK has always grown in leaps’

    ‘We want to be number one. Life OK has always grown in leaps’

    When two years ago Star India decided to “reincarnate” one of its older channels Star One as Life OK and repackage it with new, fresh content, nobody expected that in a short span of time it would offer stiff competition to the other existing general entertainment offerings. For hadn’t the Star India management been at a loss for quite some time as to what it would do with it.

     

    But with some path breaking content like Saubhagyavati Bhava initially and Savdhaan India and Devon Ke Dev…Mahadev later, not only did the newbie Life OK lure viewers to itself but it also got industry pundits to take notice and nod their heads in appreciation.

     

    It still describes itself as, “a brand new general entertainment channel (GEC) that turns up the volume on the things that really matter through its unique and poignant stories” on its online homepage. And general manager Ajit Thakur is happy that he “didn’t succumb to the temptation of doing the usual GEC saas-bahu soaps.”

     

    On the occasion of its second anniversary Thakur had a chat with Indiantelevision.com’s Disha Shah on its journey so far. Excerpts from the conversation:

     

    Two years for any media entity implies that it is here to stay. Would you say that for your channel?

     

    Absolutely we are here to stay. But I think two years later there are lots of thoughts – the first thought is that – when we started two years back, we had the backing of Uday Shankar, Sanjay Gupta and the Star Network that this was the channel which was not going to be a flanker to Star Plus but a challenger. It was a promise. 

     

    Two years later, I think the promise is more than fulfilled and real. And there are many good things about it – the fact that in this year almost all channels have declined, and Life OK is only one of the two channels which have grown through January-December this year.

     

    We are happy at the fact that we didn’t succumb to the temptation of doing the usual general entertainment channel (GEC) – saas-bahu soaps. We have stayed away from it because we didn’t want to divide the family; we wanted to entertain the entire family. We are not targeting women, men or kids but all of them. We have managed to do it differently and with a lot of conviction, remained profitable, continued to grow, so that is a very happy place to be in, but are we there yet? No, I don’t think so we are there yet. It is a glass half full. We have a lot more shows working but we haven’t had a big impact like Mahadev in the last two years.

     

    In terms of marketing, we have a long way to go with the brand. Life OK is there in terms of reach and people are talking about us, but we are still not the number one channel in terms of overall numbers. And it is equally important from the perception point of view, we now have to start scaling and telling people that we are amongst the top channel. Thus perception, big shows and somewhat impact has to come through.

     

    What have been the high and the low points for the channel in the last two years?

     

    The launch of the channel was itself a high. When Mahadev took off after four months of the launch, it was a high. The fact that on weekends nobody gave us a chance but today we are at number two/three without a single singing, dancing or a big non-fiction show, on the back of alternative content like Savdhaan India and Shapath.

     

    I think the big high for us is that almost every day I have people calling from other channels and some production houses saying that, “We don’t care if you are at number six or four or number one. There is something working for Life OK and we want to join.” And this call comes to us every single day. That is something about the culture we have created. The young team and everybody doing their job for the first time even at the HOD level – that is the big high.

     

    We are still not number one, that is the low point for us. We want to be number one. The lows are that for every one hit we had three failures. But we take it in our stride, I think the day we stop failing, we stop learning. Without the low the high is not as enjoyed as when you have a low.

     

    To what do you attribute the success of Life OK?

     

    First and foremost, Star Network had the vision to create its own competition for Star Plus. Without the network, we would not have been where we were. Second, it is the sharpness and clarity of the brand vision that we wanted to be the brand for the family, we will not do saas-bahu, we will go beyond entertainment into social media messaging. Third and the most important reason is the kind of people and culture we have attracted. Even though we stay in the same Star Network building, Life OK has its different kind of culture of its own.

     

    How would you rate Life OK today and before you joined?

     

    When I came in, the channel’s work was in progress. Since I have been in the Star Network, one thing I have done for Life OK is that I have put people and team together. Most of the people who used to work for Star One are still with Life OK. So it’s about commitment to the new vision rather than different people.

     

    What is the life-cycle of a programme on Life OK?

     

    The attrition rate is very high. One, we pick up stories that are more of a finite series. Second is we don’t take regular saas-bahu stories where you know that you cannot keep the story stretching for long. Third, we always take risk in trying something new. Our risk appetite is high and also failure rate is high. But like I said, I have enjoyed. There is so much to learn from each failure. Because if we don’t try the new genre, how will we learn?

     

    How do you differentiate between Star Plus and Life OK’s target audiences?

     

    Star Plus is focused on the young new women of new India today. At Life OK, we don’t want to take a TG cut because we don’t think that is important. We want to cater to the entire family. But within that the mindset which Star Plus is targeting is different than Life OK. The difference is very clear when you see the channel – we offer something for the entire family. If you watch the channel at 7 pm and 9 pm, there will be different kind of stories. It will not be the same story set in the same house. And that is what we take pride in.

     

    What is the channel’s reach as compared to other channels?

     

    Our reach has been growing. In many weeks, we have been number two or three in the ratings chart. People were not sure what will happen to the channel after LC1 and digitization but we are the ones who have been growing right through because digitisation meant that our platform was available and we got an equal chance. 

    So in LC1, we are always going to be deeper because when we launch, we launch with 100 markets in 100 towns with outdoor and everything. So from that point of view we were fairly clear that we will be able to stick to our strategy and deliver some numbers.

    The highest reach is 55 per cent and we have reached almost to 50-54 per cent. We have hit 54 in some ways depending upon the launches and other activities. Now what we want to add to this reach is impact.

     

    Has the channel attracted new producers?

     

    Absolutely. Even when we were at number six, we have had some of the best producers working with us. Today the line-up in the next six months includes productions by Ekta Kapoor and the Barjatyas. We are also working with many Bollywood directors and actors. Whether we are at number six, four or one, the attitude and culture of Life OK has remained unmatched.

     

    Are you looking at pushing the envelope of storytelling further?

     

    All the time. It will be edgy and extreme. If you watch Ek Boond Ishq, it is extremely edgy. It is the reflection of what is happening in that household. Dil Se Di Dua… Saubhagyavati Bhavawas extremely edgy, like a thriller, Main Lakshmi Tere Aangan Ki was almost a love story in comic.

     

    What new genres you plan to get into programming?

     

    We have done fantasy with Hatim. For me Ringa Ringa Roses is also very interesting – it is not a typical horror, but about paranormal activity. I want to do a family thriller. I also want to do a period drama, which we have not done yet. These are the next two genres I can think off.

     

    Are you considering adapting international formats?

     

    That is the big part of our strategy. We will do more formats. First we started with books –Navvidhaan – which is already on-air as Tumahri Paakhi. We are looking at two more books. We are also looking at three-four American series. Also, for the first time a lot of new producers are working for the channel. All this is happening in the next six months.

     

    How much research work goes into developing the channel? Is it rigorous?

     

    A lot, because this is something I fundamentally believe in it. Research is not about should we do this or not, our research is primarily focused on what is small town in UP? What is Bombay? What are they thinking? What are the shifting preferences? Most of our research is about understanding aspirations of the audience. What they want to do? How are they reacting to things? What are their views on India or elections and many more? We are trying to understand everything that is happening in their lives. We have a very consumer focused outlook.

     

    How have the advertisers taken to the channel?

     

    If you look at the channel a year back, except for Mahadev we did not have sponsors for any show. Today, we have a sponsor for every show. In some shows, we even have two sponsors. We have grown on reach. One year back only Mahadev was delivering on reach, now shows like SavdhaanShapathEk Boond IshqGustakh Dil and even Tumahri Paakhi has good reach. Each one is attracting more advertisers and each is different.

     

    We have everything from Shakti Bhog to Hindustan Unilever on the channel. They are as different from each other, but they co-exist because the brand delivers reach in different markets and in different TG. And you can slice and cut it in different ways and do that. We have telecom, automobile, all the big FMCG brands and also the local brands which are coming out in a big way to advertise with us.

     

    What are the cumulative between men and women viewership? How much of it is children?

     

    It is 52 per cent female and 48 per cent male. Lot of GECs would have 58 per cent women. Within male and female, kids would be 15 per cent.

     

    Which are your big markets internationally apart from India?

     

    When Bachelorette India launched, UK and US were big markets for us. We have experimented but some of it has not worked in India. However, in International markets, it has worked well. Other markets like Canada, Middle East is very big for us and I think with Hatim it will become even bigger.

     

    Life OK is at number four right now, any specific programming strategy?

     

    Historically when we have grown, we grew to 100 then we have stayed for some time, then we went to 120 and stayed for some time, then 140 and 160. So we launched at eight per cent share, and we have seen a growth of 14 per cent share now. We have always grown in leaps. It is not a trick. What we did with Mahadev, Hatim is one scale above. We are going to take content to the next level.

     

    What is your plan for the next few years?

     

    Of course we want to continue to grow. Big plan for next year is that we want to tell people that when Life OK is serious about something, it really makes an impact. And that is what we want to do. We want to create an impact. We want to create three-four shows but all done differently. We want to have some impact properties, some big stars and directors on board.

     

    But most importantly, we want to break few more norms. We want to create new genres, we want to look at some American content coming to Indian television but done differently, we want to shoot in new light – what we did with mythology, we want to do the same with other shows. So anything to push the content, marketing and people agenda in a different direction.

     

    On the digital side, how do you keep your viewers engaged?

     

    I want to build the brand. I just don’t want people to come and see posters. Hatim is very active on digital but we want people to come and see the show. We talk about serious issues through all our shows. We just launched our Savdhaan app which is about when you travel to any city in the country that app can tell you what to watch out for and which streets not to go to. So the brand thought is so powerful that we want to continue to build the brand on digital. Our digital agenda is not going to be only about the show.

     

    Has the channel achieved a break even? (Estimated 300-350 crore per year)

     

    We are profitable in our year two. We are very different from the GECs. Shapath being the classic example, at 9 pm, every other GEC on weekend has singing and dancing shows – that cost is 5x and Shapath is x (20 per cent of that cost). Shapath manages 2 TVR, all the other shows get around 2.8. It is working because it is different.

     

    What was the biggest challenge for you?

     

    Biggest challenge was to stay quiet and don’t talk too much about it and just deliver results. And why should I talk about it? Viewers are accepting it, advertisers are advertising in it. Trade is interested in it.

     

    What future do you foresee for the channel in the digitised world?

     

    I think digitised world is only going to demand more content. Content will be the king. People will demand the kind of content they want. So for me, the fact that we have variety and we are younger, fresher – all of it is keeping us in good place in the digitised world.

  • Zee TV gains again, escalates to number two in Week 49

    Zee TV gains again, escalates to number two in Week 49

    MUMBAI: In the week 49 of TAM TV ratings, Zee TV has become the gainer for the second time consecutively. While last week, the channel just earned more points, this time it has escalated to the second position from the usual third as well. With the telecast of Zee Rishtey Awards on Sunday, the channel garnered 479,878 GVTs (448,553) of which 8599 TVTs were scored solely by the award show. The channel’s sitcom Bh se Bhade witnessed good traction and reported 2,346 TVTs (2,079). Its popular dance reality show Dance India Dance 4 aired its two-hour maha episode which scored 4,565 TVTs (4,392).

    Another highlight of the week was Boogie Woogie Kids Championship that made a comeback to the TV screens and even to Sony Entertainment Channel after a gap of almost four years. Interestingly, the show which has always attracted audience, did quite well again and scored 4,411 TVTs. While the channel witnessed a rise in the number of GVTs, the show couldn’t change the sixth spot at which it has been on since quite some time. It scored 241,395 GVTs (238,987).

    Second highest gainer of the week was Star Plus which scored 561,197 GVTs (548,331) and continued to be at number one in the ratings chart. The channel’s new series Yeh Hai Mohabbatein grabbed eyeballs and garnered 2,320 TVTs. However, its dance reality show Nach Baliye 6 saw a drop with 3,945 TVTs (4,267). The epic series Mahabharat too lost on its viewership and could just garner 6,689 TVTs (7,170).

    Colors came down to number three this week with 456,302 GVTs (478,534). Unfortunately, the channel has witnessed a drop in almost all its properties. Comedy Night with Kapil reported 7,522 TVTs (7,851), action thriller series 24 scored 2,523 TVTs (2,797). However, Bigg Boss witnessed a marginal increase and scored 5,262 TVTs (5,102).

    Life OK stood at number four with 325,066 GVTs (334,327) followed by Sab with 260,862 GVTs (269,269).

    Sahara One is still lagging behind and is at the bottom of the ratings list with 34,881 GVTs (33,691).

    In the movie channel genre, Zee Cinema reported 211,162 GVTs (253,575); Star Gold registered 180,019 GVTs (181,167) and Movies OK scored 132,377 GVTs (133,805). On the other hand, &pictures notched up and scored 85,302 GVTs (81,291), Zee Anmol saw a growth in its viewership and marked 62,874 GVTs (55,524) and Max scored 141,652 GVTs (129,948).