Tag: STBs

Rationalise excise duty, Vat on TV, STBs: Planning Commission

NEW DELHI: Acknowledging that the major hurdle in digitization presently is the absence of digital receiver sets and the fact that about 45 per cent TV sets are Black and White, a sub-group of the Planning Commission has recommended rationalization of the total taxation level to 12 per cent.

The sub-group on ‘Going Digital’ set up by the Planning Commission and headed by Rajeeva Ratna Shah, member secretary in the Planning Commission and a former CEO of Prasar Bharati, said this will mean the excise duty on digital TV set, set top boxes (STBs) and its inputs be rationalized to 8 per cent and there should be a state VAT of 4 per cent. This will give impetus to the indigenous STB industry, which would generate economic activity and employment in the country.

The sub-group noted that STBs and the digital Conditional Access System (Cas) act as a catalyst for implementation of digitization. The Consumer Electronics and TV Manufacturing Association (Cetma) has indicated that the cost increase in case of a TV set, capable of receiving digital terrestrial signal in addition to analogue signal would be about Rs 1000 from the existing prices. For the existing analogue TV sets, which are expected to be around 120 million by year 2010, the consumers would need to have Digital Terrestrial Transmission STB to receive the signals. The cost of STB is presently about Rs 2250 and is decreasing every year by 7 to 8 per cent.

The industry would require a lead time of six months to meet the demand for the digital TV sets and radio receivers. Similarly, the industry would be in a position to provide STBs in about 16 to 20 weeks from the time the government decides to change over to digital broadcasting.

“But for successful rollout, the government needs to firm up the transition path and announce timelines so that all the stake holders could put their acts together and make the transition as smooth and successful as possible. The success of DTT depends upon the availability of requisite consumer end equipment and introduction of STB coupled with Cas.”

The sub-group added that India was a price sensitive market and one solution or product fits all cases is not commensurate with consumer thinking. Hence there may be need to introduce various models of STBs (having digital to analogue converter with addressability of channels with Cas to high-end models) with increasing value added features to meet the requirements of the consumers. The requisite standards need to be put in place for this.

Out of 61 million households cable connections all over India , 35 per cent are in rural areas. This service is easily available and affordable in the rural areas. This industry is geared up to meet the challenge of digital broadcasting, the sub-group noted.

At present, the signals from uplink station to satellite and from satellite to cable TV head-end are already digital. The signal from cable TV head-end to subscriber is both in digital and analog format. Most of the multi-service operators (MSOs) in the metros and big cities have already gone digital. Thus, only 7000 head-ends required to go digital.
Furthermore, all franchisees are not affected by digitization as they only pass the signal (analog/digital) received from the head-end to the subscribers and do not process the signal. Digitization of subscribers end depends on introduction of digital TV in the market at affordable prices and immediate digitalization of cable TV head-end.

To further galvanize the rollout, all the content producers – Prasar Bharati as well as private operators – should provide agreed and identified channels in the digital/HDTV format to MSO/cable operators under the “Must Carry” clause.

Going digital encompasses digital broadcasting, telecom as well as other technologies for access and backbone networks which deploy digital systems. While some of the frequency bands used for broadcasting have exclusive allocations for ‘broadcasting’, most of the bands are shared with other services.

For example, the 800/ 900 MHz bands used for cellular services – GSM & CDMA, etc. are available for broadcasting also. The satellite based TV broadcasting is mostly in the frequency bands, which are shared with microwave systems. Hence, while evolving/ modifying the NFAP (National Frequency Allocation Plan), the relative national priorities of various spectrum based services have to be taken into account.

Normally digital transmissions require larger bandwidth. However, with modern compression techniques, which are improving continuously, it is now possible to accommodate multiple channels in the RF bandwidth of a single existing (analogue) channel. Hence, on complete transition to digital systems in broadcasting, the spectrum requirements should reduce or alternatively, it would be possible to transmit larger number of channels in the bandwidth occupied by existing channels.

During the transition phase, existing analogue and new digital systems would need to be broadcast together, requiring larger spectrum bandwidth. The requirements can be assessed once the number of channels for simultaneous transmission is worked out. With digital broadcasting, it is possible to include data, Internet, etc. within the broadcasting channels.

During the migration from Analogue to Digital Radio, new frequency assignments have to be identified to facilitate smooth migration and for some time both the existing analogue transmissions as well as new digital transmissions would continue. Hence, there will be spectrum constraint during this transition phase. Also, the spectrum for digital migration may need to be identified for both Prasar Bharati as well as Private FM Broadcasters.

The sub-group, comprising 17 members, was set up by the Committee on Information, Communication and Entertainment (ICE) that has been examining the larger issue of convergence and advent of modern technology. Members include the secretaries in Information and Broadcasting and Department of Telecommunications, the Prasar Bharati CEO, the presidents of Cetma, Mait, Nasscom, and ISP Association of India, co-chairman of the Ficci entertainment committee Kunal Dasgupta, chairman of the CII entertainment committee, chairman of the Film & Television Producers Guild of India, president of the Cable TV Operators Association, Rajiv Mehrotra who is the managing trustee of the Public Service Broadcasting Trust, Virat Bhatia from AT&T Communications Services, Zee Telefilms President Abhijit Saxena, Sameer Rao who is vice-president in charge of strategy, planning & regulatory in Star India, and a representative of the Prime Minister’s Office.

February 26, 2007

Zee Turner: Budget should stop double taxation from broadcasters

NEW DELHI: Broadcasters have expressed the hope that the government will ease the taxation structure for the initial three to five years and introduces policies that promote domestic manufacturing of set top boxes because the high import duty and taxes like octroi and other taxes were acting as a bottleneck in smooth transition to digitalisation.

Zee Turner CEO Arun Poddar told indiantelevision.com today that irrational rates were dissuading Indian entrepreneurs from investing in the production of STBs. He hoped the government would introduce policies that promote domestic manufacturing of STBs.

Listing his expectations from Union Budget 2007-08 being presented on 28 February, Poddar appealed for doing away with double taxation from broadcasters. He said since media was part of the entertainment as well as a service industry, broadcasters were charged both entertainment tax and service tax.

He said the entertainment industry was in the transition mode from analogue to digital and it was extremely imperative for the government to take steps that not only accelerate the process but also make this industry an interesting and appealing investment proposition for Indian manufacturers.

Service tax remained one of the crucial and unresolved issues in the entertainment industry and should be sorted out in the forthcoming Union budget. While service tax is levied on the electronic media, the print media is exempted from any such taxation. This is despite the fact that both print and electronic fall under media and entertainment industry. There was therefore need to create a level playing field for all, and take measures to bring electronic at par with print media.

“The 400,000 exemption limit from service tax has led to ‘appalling confusion and dissatisfaction’. While the last mile cable operators are able to take undue advantage of this exemption limit, multi system operators (MSOs) and broadcasters were being penalized,” Poddar said. The last mile cable operators conveniently avoid passing the service tax to MSOs by under declaring their subscriber base by almost 80 to 85 per cent. MSOs and broadcasters paid service tax but could not recover this from the last mile operators.

He expressed the hope that the government would bring about clarity on how service tax should be charged or should waive the exemption limit completely.

February 22, 2007

Trai pitches for duty slash on STB components, seeks removal of entertainment tax on cable TV

NEW DELHI: The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) has take up the demands of stakeholders in the broadcasting industry and recommended to the Finance Ministry that there is a need for tax rationalisation. The chief amongst which is abolishing of customs duty on import of components for the local manufacture of STBs.

MSO sources tell indiantelevison.com that Trai has suggested to the ministry that it should ensure a level playing field in the interest of digitalisation of cable television, which has seen increased demand after the rollout of Cas.

For the benefit of the consumers, Trai has also suggested that Entertainment Tax be abolished from the cable TV sector.

Trai has argued, as the MSOs had desired, that this is the only industry in which both service tax and entertainment tax are levied, the latter going to the state governments, and suggested that instead of the extra entertainment tax burden, there should be evolved a system of sharing a part of the service tax with the state governments.

These sources say also that Trai has for the first time written to the government of the reports the industry has been filing since the middle of January this year, that after Cas rollout, the interest in digitalised TV has vastly increased, and Trai says that there are requests from areas not covered under mandatory Cas for the same system being introduced.

The issues were discussed in a roundtable between Trai, the MSOs and other stakeholders earlier this month.

Trai has written to the government, sources requesting anonymity tell indiantelevision.com, that the stakeholders desire rationalisation of tax structure, because greater convergence in broadcast and telecommunication technologies in the near future would result in the distinction between the two services getting increasingly blurred.

Hence the need for a level playing field, which in turn could not be brought about without required rationalisation of taxation in the two sectors.

Trai feels that the current additional customs duty of 4 per cent on components of set top boxes and associated items like viewing cards should be abolished, just as has been done for the components and parts of cellular phones and mobile phones.

The Trai wishlist sent to the MoF, sources say, recommends the complete removal of basic customs duty on imported digital headend equipment from the present 12.5 per cent, to improve penetration in the country as a whole.

Trai says this is quite in line with the abolition of duty on import of STBs done in 2006.

The MSOs say that they had desired that though excise duty is currently levied on the transaction value of STBs, which are sold as packaged commodity, in the same manner as mobile phones, televisions and cameras, but wherever required manufacturers may be given the option for the scheme on which excise duty is levied on the basis of MRP, with an abatement of 40 per cent.

Presently, this is applicable to other packaged commodities, and Trai has sent this as part of the recommendation to the ministry as well.

In consonance with the wishes of the MSOs and other stakeholders, Trai has also suggested that the telecom department has demanded reduction of excise duty on telecom equipment to 8 per cent, and this same should be applicable to manufacture of STBs.

The stakeholders had told Trai that this would be necessary because with greater convergence of technologies, it would be tough to distinguish between the services.

There is another tricky issue on excise duty. MSOs say that the premises of the subscriber where the set top box is deployed should be treated as the extended premises of the service provider and the STBs at the premises of the subscriber be treated as the possession of the service provider.

This would enable them to avail a set-off of excise duty paid, against its service tax liability.

February 21, 2007

CII moots 5% customs duty on imported STBs in bid to boost local manufacture

NEW DELHI: While demanding various reductions and exemptions of taxes and duties that would be beneficial for the media and broadcasting industry in general, the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) has demanded a hike in customs duty on STBs from the present nil to 5 per cent.

The CII has demanded exemptions and tax burden relief on capital goods import and other issues, especially those meant for infrastructure development, creation of intellectual property and import of colour TV and picture tubes.

Yet, so far as STBs are concerned, the CII says that whereas in the present situation, import of STBs do not attract any customs duty, this should be raised to five per cent in the budget for 2007.

The CII, in its document “Pre-Budget Memorandum” gives its own arguments on that count.

It says: “Excise Duty on STBs was exempted on 24th June 2003 to facilitate introduction of Conditional Access System in the country. In the budget 2006, the exemption on excise duty was withdrawn but customs duty was reduced from 15 per cent to Nil. However, there was no corresponding reduction of customs duty on inputs used in the manufacturing of STBs. This has resulted into another case of inverted customs duty structure.

“The correction of the anomaly can be achieved either the by reduction of customs duty on inputs required for manufacturing of STBs to Nil, or increasing of customs duty on the import of STBs from Nil to 5 per cent, and also allowing import of inputs at five per cent.”

A senior tax consultant told indiantelevision.com that the measure would benefit local manufacture of STBs, as the customs duty on import of boxes and import of input components would be the same, whereas previously, there was no customs duty on import to STBs.

Currently, MSOs are importing STBs mainly from China and Korea.

“This is a pro-local manufacturing and necessary corrective measure from an earlier skewed customs regime so far as STBs are concerned,” he explained.

The CII recommendation says that the second option is preferable.

It says also: “In case it is felt that it would increase the price of imported STBs, then excise duty can be reduced from 16 per cent to 12 per cent on STBs as well as its major imported inputs.

Meanwhile, there are many general recommendations of the CII that would benefit the industry.

It has specifically suggested that the customs duty on glass parts of the colour picture tubes for TV sets should be reduced from 12.5 per cent to five per cent.

It has argued here that the Free Trade Agreement between India and Thailand has a list of goods covered by the Early Harvest Scheme and includes CTV and colour picture tubes.

“Consequently, customs duty on CTV (8528 12) and CPT (8540 11) imported from Thailand was reduced to 12 per cent on September 2004, and to 6.25 per cent on September 1, 2005. The impact of (this) reduction has resulted in tremendous increase of imports (from Thailand).

On the telecom sector the CII has recommended that there should be a reduction of customs duty to five per cent on capital goods required for manufacture of telecommunication equipment covered by the IT agreement.

It also wants to extend the present “Nil” customs concession to inputs for the manufacture of components / sub assemblies duty under serial number 239 of customs notification 21/2002.

Across the board, CII has recommended measures that will benefit industry as a whole and consequently the media and broadcasting industry. It has, for instance, recommended reduction of CENVAT rate of 16 per cent to 14 per cent in the budget 2007, and has also said that the service tax of 12 per cent must not be increased.

On the issue of infrastructure development CII has suggested that the government may consider more loans from international institutions.

“Gross Capital Formation in infrastructure must be progressively raised from 4.5 per cent of GDP to 11 per cent,” the report of CII says.

In general, all companies and employees may stand to benefit also if the CII recommendation of abolishing of Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT), in consonance with the desires of business as a whole, ever since the tax was slapped vide the Finance Act 2005.

It outlines the alternative thus:

“Either the tax should be abolished or the choice be given to tax paying firms to pay one per cent additional corporate tax on its total income in lieu of FBT. Otherwise the corporate could chose to remain under FBT. If this is not possible, the CII proposes levy of FBT only on elements of personal benefit to employees, and exclusion of deeming provision of treating a portion of pure business expenses as personal expenses.”

The CII recommendation on depreciation would also benefit the media and broadcasting industry.

Stating that it is well known that technology is changing fast, “and unless we are able to replace our assets fast, we cannot match with other countries in terms of productivity, CII has recommended that depreciation rate be raised from 15 per cent to 25 per cent, as was the case earlier, provided the rate charged under Income Tax is the same or higher than charged under the Companies Act.

Development of infrastructure would also benefit from the industry body recommendation that the Minimum Alternative Tax is abolished. If it is not, CII feels, it should at least be removed for infrastructure companies in order to promote development and to motivate the private investor to come into this sector.