Tag: Siti Networks

  • In hybrid push, Siti Networks launches Siti PlayTop Android TV set top box

    In hybrid push, Siti Networks launches Siti PlayTop Android TV set top box

    New DELHI: In a bid to cement its place in the hybrid set-top box space, multi-system operator (MSO) Siti Networks has launched Siti PlayTop Magic, a 4K HDR STB which offers Android TV features along with linear TV. For a superior next-generation entertainment experience, the STB uses NAGRA’s card-less content security solution. This represents NAGRA’s first Android TV project in India based on the Google MediaCAS framework for Android TV deployments.

    Through its partnership with NAGRA, Siti Networks hopes to rapidly deploy both secure and market-leading Android TV services across its three-million strong subscriber base in India including a comprehensive content offering and access to a large library of applications.

    Additionally, Siti PlayTop Magic's mobile app, available on both iOS and Android platforms, brings a single subscription for multiple OTT apps like Hungama Play, Shemaroo Me and Adda Times in customers’ palms.

    The roll-out of Siti PlayTop STB and iOS/Android apps is a crucial part of the MSO’s expansion strategy in India, remarked Indian Cable Net Company Ltd (JV partner of Siti) director Suresh Sethiya.

    "We are delighted to partner with Nagra, who provides comprehensive support for Android TV through an end-to-end content protection ecosystem. This box will make any TV Smart while bringing Siti HD+ digital cable television's ultimate viewing experience with a DVR facility,” shared Siti Networks CEO Anil Malhotra.

    The NAGRA solution provides comprehensive support for Android TV through an end-to-end content protection ecosystem that can be extended at a time of an operator’s choosing through additional options such as forensic watermarking and/or anti-piracy services.

    Deployed “as a service,” it enables operators to take advantage of reduced total cost of ownership and regular modular and cloud-driven updates and frameworks for both CAS and DRM integration, while ensuring the ecosystem remains protected from pirates.

    “We’re proud to partner with Siti Networks on its continued expansion within the Indian market,” said NAGRA SVP – sales APAC Stephane Le Dreau. “The strength, level of innovation and unique features of NAGRA’s content and service protection services for Android TV provides operators around the world with the tools they need to protect their content and rapidly deploy and protect their next-generation services against piracy.”

  • Siti Networks to acquire 76% stake in Meghbela Infitel

    Siti Networks to acquire 76% stake in Meghbela Infitel

    KOLKATA: Multi-system operator (MSO) Siti Networks will pick up 76 per cent stake in Meghbela Infitel Cable & Broadband through its subsidiary Indian Cable Net Company. The board constituted investment committee of the company has approved the acquisition in a meeting held on 25 March 2021.

    Meghbela Infitel was incorporated on 9 July 2015 under the Companies Act, 2013. It is engaged in MSO business and has a presence in Kolkata. 76 per cent equity stake in the paid-up equity share capital of the company will be acquired by Siti Networks’ subsidiary.

    While consideration will be payable in cash, 7,600 shares will be acquired at Rs 10 each. “Meghbela is in the process of acquisition of cable TV business in Kolkata, which will help in expansion of the market of the company in Kolkata,” the company said in a regulatory filing on BSE.

    Siti Networks posted Rs 390.6 crore total revenue for the third quarter of FY2020. It posted Rs 270.6 crore subscription revenue in the same quarter.

    The MSO’s operating EBITDA surged to Rs 63.80 crore. This was achieved through strict control over expenses and operating efficiencies, the company stated. Its operating EBITDA margin for the quarter moved to 16.3 per cent through control of various cost elements.

    Siti Broadband also expanded its footprint to 21 cities by the end of the quarter, with the net base increasing to 1.9 lakh.

  • VBS 2021: Customer remains king for cable & broadband industry

    VBS 2021: Customer remains king for cable & broadband industry

    NEW DELHI: In the aftermath of Covid2019, businesses and organisations across the world tried to make sense of what hit them as they weighed their futures against the new lessons that the pandemic taught them, unlearning some of the established tenets in the process. Industry experts largely agree that the television broadcasting, video-on-demand (VoD) and broadband ecosystem had it relatively better off with their customers homebound and skyrocketing demands for connectivity and content. However, swift technological evolution and even swifter changes in consumer behaviour and demands posed challenges on this front too.

    And these challenges are what the seventeenth edition of the Video and Broadband Summit attempted to shine a light on. The insightful discussions during the summit rounded off with a session focusing on ‘Customer First’ moderated by PwC India Partner Raman Kalra. The panelists included some eminent names from the industry, such as JioFiber president Anuj Jain, Siti Networks DGM Strategy Anurag Nigam, UCN Cable Network head – operations Debashish Mohanty, GTPL Hathway vice president Yatin Gupta and Shemaroo entertainment COO – broadcasting business Sandeep Gupta.

    Kalra opened the session by commenting about how customers today are spoilt for choice when it comes to choosing content to consume, with mushrooming VoD and OTT platforms and ever increasing channels of entertainment. He noted that despite the demands for content and internet broadband having hit the roof during the pandemic, the challenge of remaining relevant is a concern for both the service and content provider in the highly competitive market today. Kalra posed the question on what strategies can be adopted by the industry players so as to ensure they continue to acquire and retain their customer base, keeping in mind the constantly changing customer demands and behaviour.

    Jain agreed that “customer first is the fundamental pillar” for their business. He stated three crucial points for the same—

    ·       How to enable the “right plan” for the customer to get associated with the brand

    ·       How do you deliver customer onboarding, meeting the promises that you made in the plan

    ·       Third is “in life” wherein after the customer gets activated, your service has to  perform and if not, you must be aware and able to pinpoint where, when and what went wrong through data analytics. To further make his point Jain shared what is referred to as the ‘death of call center’ set-up wherein the business must know about the disruption in service, before the customer breaks it to them.

    Gupta shared insights on the major consumer demand shift in the last twelve-odd months of Covid. “It reflected a huge spike in terms of subscriber base for cable TV which flattened out later. But the broadband business has continued to grow because people are still working from home, kids are still studying from home.”

    In order to deal with the impact of consumers’ pressing demands, altered business strategies had to be deployed, shared Mohanty. “In the present scenario customers have multiple demands- linear TV, OTT Content, online classes, work-from-home- everything he needs from a single desktop or device, sometimes. Basically FTH- Fibre-To-Home is the best solution for connectivity at least for the next few years.”

    He went on to say, “UCN is doing a QOS (quality of service) survey – on what the customer feels about UCN connectivity quality and bandwidth. As of now we are providing 100 Mbps which we have increased to 300 Mbps with unlimited plans,” and added that with increasing consumer demands, if a business today fails to provide a particular service, then someone else will.

    Nigam interjected how nobody could have imagined a year back that the entire India would work from home one day. “All this has forced an average household to stick to the basics, that is focus on the necessities and be frugal for as long as they can,” he said. If this continues for too long, it will impact the industry on multiple levels, whether it’s the broadcaster or a distribution partner.

    Citing an instance from MSO consumer behaviour post lockdown, he shared how consumers had become selective while opting for TV packages. “Consumers have downgraded from high value content package to low value package or they have opted for standard definition (SD) DPO pack and topped it with ala carte HD channels, instead of taking an HD package. Why? Because the pricing of SD was lower than HD, this despite having an HDTV at their disposal.” Even multiple TV households were decreasing and hybrid TVs were getting replaced with OTTs during the lockdown.

    Debashish took the discussion further by adding that lack of “exclusivity” in HD channel content is a major factor, since the customer is getting similar content on SD at a lower price. “So channel packaging needs to be done as per customer requirement,” he remarked. Entry barrier is also due to the higher pricing, as compared to SD. Only if HD content differs and is exclusive can we see real change, was broadly agreed by all.

    Competitiveness has also gotten fiercer, which can adversely impact the revenue of the whole industry in the long run. “Hence it is time that all industry players come up with product differentiation- exploring new customer segments, converting customer service departments into ‘customer experience enhancement’ departments  which can only be achieved if all the stakeholders work together towards a common goal- that’s ensuring customer success,” stated Nigam.

    From a content perspective, Shemaroo’s Sandeep Gupta said, “At Shemaroo, content is evaluated based on customer taste. So content has to keep evolving for, at the end of the day, consumers come to us looking for entertainment. For broadcasting, we look into the research and BARC data.”

    The discussion then steered to customer acquisition and on what are the leading practices being taken by the industry to ensure it. Jio’s Anuj Jain began by admitting they focused more on delivering on customer expectations and less on marketing. He added that fibre being a cherry picking market and more localised, it’s a different challenge altogether.

    When it comes to the cable industry, it is mostly a “one or two sizes fits all” kind of business, admitted GTPL Hathway’s Gupta, with not much being looked into individual customer preferences as long as they get their pack of choice. This situation is slowly changing, the company has begun ‘know your customer’ processes to understand who is the customer first and inform them about the innovative products or services on offer. “We were one of the very few platforms that started a campaign targeted at all DTH players called ‘Chhatri hatao, GTPL lagao’ to remove the Dish and replace with GTPL Hathway subscription, which got a fair amount of response from consumers,” he added.

    Knowing your consumer is a part of the process to enhance consumer experience, which also involves proactively handling tech / troubleshooting issues. “With our one million subscriber base, the total data that is collected from every customer per week is one Petabyte of data- which captures every aspect of the customer experience data- any sync issues, freezing, buffering issues etc. This is how we make customers the focus and part of the process,” explained Jain.

    Factors like user outreach and bettering their experience goes on to ensure customer stickiness. Brands need to be consistent, facilitate continuity, safeguard connectivity of service and target smooth onboarding experience to achieve this goal, suggested the panelists.

    The session concluded by highlighting that there’s a need for businesses to invest deeply in knowing and engaging with their customers. Analysing customers’ content consumption data can also lead to rich dividends and RoI. “Deep data insights and data intelligence can lead to immense possibilities for businesses,” Kalra summed up. In conclusion, enhancing customer service and experience is a key component to the success and growth of every stakeholder in the industry.

  • What is hindering the fixed broadband growth in India?

    What is hindering the fixed broadband growth in India?

    KOLKATA: The last few years have seen a major explosion in internet usage, especially post Covid2019 crisis with the boom of digital payments, e-commerce, online video consumption, e-learning. Despite the huge scope, fixed broadband sector has seen a tepid growth in India, unlike mobile broadband. Issues like poor optical fibre infrastructure, high capex cost for ground networks, hardship in obtaining Right to Way (RoW) permission are deterring the expansion of the sector, as major players have commented in response to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s (TRAI) consultation paper.

    GTPL Hathway pointed out three main reasons for the poor subscription of fixed broadband service – lack of availability, affordability, accessibility. The MSO has pointed out that more and more optical fibre infrastructure in the access network needs to be rolled out across the country. Along with the high capex cost involved in rolling out of last-mile access network, obtaining NoC and RoW permissions at several levels of authority for laying cable also prevents the development, as per the MSO.

     “Fixed-line services are capex intensive as the provider needs to invest a lot of funds in providing the services in the ground networking and also at the subscriber end so availability is very limited so is the subscription,” Siti Networks said.

    However, one of the largest Internet Service Providers in India, Atria Convergence Technologies (ACT) has denied that the subscription rate of fixed broadband is low. But the reach of the optical fibre cable network needs to be greatly improved upon, ACT said.

    The telecom service provider Bharti Airtel echoed the same sentiment. Lack of single window clearance and the complicated and time-consuming process for obtaining RoW permissions coupled with exorbitant fees result in unviable commercial fibre deployments, it said.

    “Another hindrance to creating a viable fixed-line network is the cost TSPs incur in installing and maintaining the infrastructure of a fixed network. Also, the additional burden of license fees of 8 per cent on AGR further reduces the commercial viability of such networks,” Airtel added. Moreover, several government and private projects for road widening, laying of electrical cables, maintenance of water and sewer pipelines result in damage to the laid fibre, it mentioned.

    GTPL Hathway mentioned that less than 15 per cent of wireline broadband connections are working on FTTH technology. Commenting about the slower growth of fibre-to-the-home (FTTH) in the country, Siti Networks said the absence of local supply chain is a major issue. The ISP added that the government should take the initiative in developing a robust supply chain in the country in order to facilitate local production to ensure sufficient inventory.

    “The wired broadband penetration is capital intensive and it’s difficult to lure financial investors to this industry due to slow reachability, fees, and taxes applicable on the sector,” ACT added. The ISP also noted that ease in the policy framework for promoting FTTH connectivity will result in-service providers providing an affordable and better quality of services which in turn, will enable the public at large to subscribe to these services.

    While the local cable operators in the country could play significant role in fixed broadband growth, there are several factors like non-lucrative business model, the burden of AGR issues, high cost for obtaining ISP license, requirement of high capex for upgrading to new technology that is holding them back from providing broadband services. 

  • Zeel provisions for outstanding Siti Networks dues

    Zeel provisions for outstanding Siti Networks dues

    KOLKATA: The outstandings of Siti Networks and Dish TV has been one of the major concerns for Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (Zeel). While the DTH platform Dish TV is making payments on the line of the revised plan for recovering dues, Siti Networks has failed to play old subscription overdues.

    During the Q2 earnings call of ZeeL, MD & CEO Punit Goenka said that the company has collected the receivables related to revenues in the first half of FY 21 from the cable network. But it has failed to pay subscription overdue in accordance with payment plan agreed earlier due to various challenges including Covid2019, the pressure to prioritise lender’s payments, Goenka added.

    As Siti Networks has made payment for all content delivered during April-September, this cash and carry model will be continued going forward. But as it has failed to pay old outstandings, ZeeL has taken a provision of Rs 81.2 crore towards subscription receivable which was overdue. Goenka emphasised that the company has not written off any debt and it would make all endeavours to recover the dues.

    “Further on account of accelerated payment grievance by some of the lenders due to delay in restructuring by Siti Networks and their failure to negotiate extended repayment plans, the company has provided for extra liability of Rs 97 crore as of 30 September 2020. The provisions have been taken as a provisional  measure and company will take necessary efforts s to recover this due,” Goenka commented.

    On the other hand, Dish TV has been able to cope up with the new payment plan as its financial position has improved. The DTH operator is paying its monthly billing along with clearing a part of its arrears. Currently, Dish TV’s outstanding stands at Rs 4. 98 bn compared to Rs 5.84 bn at end of FY 20. Moreover, Goenka stated the company expects that Dish TV will accelerate payments leading to reduced arrears.

  • Zee TV at 28: A walk down memory lane

    Zee TV at 28: A walk down memory lane

    MUMBAI: 28 years sounds like a long, long time. But it seems to have gone by in a flash – for Zee TV’s founders, for TV viewers, for media observers and for investors. It was certainly an audacious move when a goateed gentleman by the name of Subhash Chandra Goyal decided to set up an entertainment channel in 1992. The only TV entertainment we were familiar with was that of public broadcaster Doordarshan for close to twenty years. The last nine or 10 of those were in colour, while the first 10 were in black and white.

    Small cable TV operators with single master antenna television services (SMATV) used to serve us with those original Hiba (Nari Hira) movies, stolen copies of popular Hindi films, pirated versions of Mind Your Language, and Top of The Pops, as well as pornos late in the night during the late eighties and early nineties. Then they began to air Satellite TV Asian Region (Star TV) channels and shows including The Bold and the Beautiful, and Chinese subtitled movies and a mix of international and Chinese songs and finally CNN and BBC, when Li Ka Shing and Richard Li flagged off the ambitious service. Successful at tapping into the minds of India’s metro dwellers, the shows gave women in the first class compartments of trains enough to chat about – such as the exploits of Eric Forrester and Brooke Logan. VJ Nonie on MTV, which was part of the STAR bouquet..

    Into that uncharted territory stepped a bunch of maverick entrepreneurs. Among them: Subhash Chandra, better known for making lamitubes for toothpaste under Essel Packaging, and a cable TV operator named Siddharth Srivastava from the southern part of Mumbai. Srivastava beat everyone to the punch, launching ATN with the promise of many more channels offering songs, movies and sports to come. ATN was interesting but was on an ageing Russian satellite which wobbled. When it did, cable TV operators had to reorient their dishes, which was pretty frequent. Hence, when Zee TV was beamed off Asiasat-2 with its bright pictures and differentiated entertainment shows, Indians became glued to it. Not just in the metros, but in smaller towns and cities, and in some prosperous villages as well.

    And it seemed like Zee TV could do no wrong, even as others attempted to get into the same entertainment channel space. Business India TV and the Times of India unveiled flashy plans while the Hindustan Times and Dr JK Jain launched channels as well. But in time they dropped out of the race, a clear indication that experience in print or out of home media need not guarantee success in television. The highly successful Business India founder, Ashok Advani, borrowed big for his BiTV and cable TV forays, but floundered so badly that his publishing empire almost went belly up.

    Meanwhile, the business savvy Chandra attracted the shrewd Rupert Murdoch to partner with him, locking him in a deal which helped Zee TV grow, and kept the Star TV network in check. The duo finally parted ways with Chandra paying off the Ozzie media baron. 

    Chandra and team seemed to have his finger on the pulse of what viewers wanted to watch: both in non-fiction and fiction. He pioneered singing talent hunts, long before the Idol franchise was created globally, tried almost every genre of fiction programming, right from drama to crime to thriller to horror to adventure to kids. He also had the foresight to acquire rights to movies, paying what seemed like top dollar in those days to acquire them for perpetuity. .

    He succeeded beyond anyone’s wildest imagination: an increasing number of channels followed. Some succeeded, some he effortlessly folded up when he discovered that audiences did not approve. He forayed into cable TV with Siti Networks, DTH with Dish TV, news with Zee Media  – all of which are assets which have served the group well. Yes,  the group could definitely monetise them better, but for that regulations have to be conducive.

    Along the way, he brought in a string of executives who promised to grow his empire. CEOs like Digvijay Singh, Vijay Jindal, RK Singh, Sandeep Goyal, Pradeep Guha came and left. Yes, the TV network did grow, but it did, at times, randomly based on Chandra’s growth urge.

    It required his elder son Punit Goenka to come in and bring some sense of order into the company by hiring professionals from mainline FMCG companies. Of course, it’s to Chandra’s credit that he supported or maybe fronted those decisions. The group forayed into print with DNA – a segment which was challenged then and is  under even more pressure today with the spread of digital. Thankfully, better sense prevailed and the legacy business was shut down.

    Chandra tried to diversify the group into other ventures like infrastructure, which required a lot of capital. To fund those projects he pledged the family’s ownership of Zee. Unfortunately, the infrastructure venture did not go according to plan and the lenders came calling. They gave the group time to pay back. And Goenka promised he and his team would deliver.

    In the meantime, many in the industry and media wrote off Chandra and sons, saying they are sitting targets for an investor-led coup, or that they would be ousted by India’s richest industrialist. They questioned the business practice transparency levels of the Zee group. Others ridiculed and dismissed indiantelevision.com’s belief in Zee’s abilities to turn the situation around.

    The forebodings of naysayers and detractors never came to pass. Today, the family owns a minority stake in the business. But it has the trust of investors who helped the promoters pay back their debts against pledged shares to banks and financial institutions. Goenka heads the organisation, his younger brother Amit leads the international and digital businesses, while Chandra is chairman emeritus. Of course, old friends such as ad man and investor Ashok Kurien continue to support the family and are on-board. Goenka has put in place measures on transparency which have more than satisfied the investor community.

    Like many other companies in the media and entertainment space, revenues have plummeted this year due to Covid2019, lockdowns and precautionary measures put in place by the government. But team Zee has been slogging it out to pull a larger share of those earnings in. Some of those initiatives are working. Goenka is sanguine that Q3 and Q4 are going to show signs of turnaround. And next year is going to be stellar. The group is banking on its widespread network of channels serving several languages in India and its OTT streaming platform Zee5 to provide entertainment and information to its viewers in the country and globally. And bring in the revenues. Zee5 is showing every sign of scaling up even further – both on the SVoD and AVoD spaces. It has signed a slew of partnerships for content and distribution and is gaining viewers, without any sport as part of its programming.

    To Chandra’s, Amit’s  and Punit’s credit, Zee has a productive studio business which churns out films and TV shows, a music label and publishing initiative and even a live venture, – all of which were halted in their planned expansions and growth courtesy the pandemic. But they have a lot of potential, undoubtedly.

     

    Over the last several months, Zee has taken steps to aid different state governments in their battle against Covid2019, whether it be by  gifting ambulances, or providing funds for PPEs and medicines. In their twenty eight year run, even while grappling with their own financial pressures, Chandra and sons have been thinking about the public good.  Just the same as when he launched Zee TV to entertain Indian audiences.

  • MY SITI Hisar – SITI Networks brings Hyper Local News to Hisar

    MY SITI Hisar – SITI Networks brings Hyper Local News to Hisar

    MUMBAI: SITI Networks Limited, an Essel Group Company, one of India’s largest Multi-System Operators (MSO), has launched a new channel, MY SITI Hisar, specifically for the people of Hisar. The channel will bring hyper-local content from Hisar and surrounding cities. The channel will be available to all customers of SITI Networks.

    Starting with a Daily News Bulletin, Hisar Update, at 7PM consisting of curated news from Hisar, the channel looks to give voice to the local with its updates from Hisar and its surrounding cities. SITI further announced that Hisar Update News Bulletin is only the beginning and soon MY SITI Hisar will be the only fully hyper local news & updates channel addressing the needs of the people of Hisar and its surrounding cities. 

    Follow Tellychakkar for the consumer facing news & entertainment

  • TRAI’s consultation: DPOs favour defined CAS/SMS framework; Tata Sky, Airtel, IMCL differ

    TRAI’s consultation: DPOs favour defined CAS/SMS framework; Tata Sky, Airtel, IMCL differ

    MUMBAI: Conditional access system (CAS) and subscriber management systems (SMS) are two key pillars of delivering broadcast services in a secured and encrypted manner to authorised subscribers. However, existing technical requirements for CAS and SMS are generic in nature allowing all type of CAS and SMS systems to exist in the eco-system. Piracy in the distribution of signals occurs due to the deployment of CAS or SMS that do not comply with security protocols as per extant standards. Hence, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) issued a consultation paper seeking comments on CAS and SMS.

    In response to the consultation paper, most major distribution platform operators (DPOs) have agreed that there is a need to define a framework for CAS/SMS systems to benchmark the minimum requirements of the system before these can be deployed by any DPO.

    Siti Networks has strongly agreed to the need of a framework commenting, “It has been observed that SMS and CAS vendors demand exorbitant amount for upgradation of their CAS/SMS according to the mandatory requirements of the regulations and the service providers does not have any option other than agree to their blackmailing due to the compliance requirement. Any such statutory upgradation in the system should not be burdened on the service providers.”

    Another major MSO, DEN Networks, also thinks that defining the framework for benchmarking the CAS or SMS will help DPOs to choose the right solution. There are various factors in CAS which differs from vendor to vendor as they use proprietary solutions to address the content security.

    GTPL Hathway also reflects the same tone as it says there is certainly an urgent need to define a framework for CAS/SMS systems. It adds that currently all CAS/SMS systems largely vary in terms of both security features and performance features.

    “Under the appliable regulations, DPOs are mandated to grant their customers a free choice to make their own package(s). However, it is pertinent to mention that most CAS available in the market have an upper limit to the number of packages in which the same service/channel can be repeated. Therefore, it is necessary that CAS should be able to be upgraded for offering all services and combinations thereof, available on such platform. Availability of full technical local support in India. Almost all CAS vendors have their experts based out-of-India which may affect DPO’s QoS as the availability of off-shore resources may sometime take time as they help remotely,” it adds.

    Among the DTH platforms, Dish TV also voiced for a comprehensive framework for CAS/SMS system especially for the requirement of end-to-end content protection and transparency in business for the CAS side and an end-to-end business enablement from the SMS side. It has also recommended an operating model wherein the DPO should have direct contract with each stack-holder viz. CAS service provider, SoC/Chipset maker, middleware, security element provider and STB maker wherein the CAS vendor will be as one of stack holder in entire echo system like others. 

    However, Tata Sky holds a different view. According to the operator, it may be premature to assume that the CAS or SMS systems require benchmarking right now. It adds that existing audits could be successful in identifying the systematic gaps which would force those specific DPOs to upgrade their systems to continue to receive signals from the broadcasters. 

    “We would need to be careful that a new and stringent regulation does not get misused to disenfranchise a large number of DPOs thus leading to another round of subscriber shock and dissatisfaction. If it is still concluded that a framework for benchmarking of the system needs to be created, then it should be arrived at by a multi stake holder consensus approach,” it adds.

    Airtel, which also runs a sizable DTH business, states that the basic and minimum requirements of CAS/SMS are well captured in Schedule III of TRAI regulation. It adds that CAS /SMS being a globally deployed technology, innovations are a constant feature. 

    "To start with, Airtel believes that TRAI can continue to use Schedule III requirements for the CAS /SMS while adding more features to it at regular intervals to make it more robust and to accommodate new innovations in the technology. Hence, there is no need for defining or introducing a new CAS /SMS framework. The requirements listed in Schedule III should be benchmarked as the minimum qualifying requirements for all CAS /SMS solutions operating in India as well as for all future deployment of CAS/SMS by a new DPO,” it states.

    While most MSOs are in favour of a framework, IMCL holds same opinion as Tata Sky and Airtel. “We believe that subject to the CAS/SMS/STB meeting the requirements specified in Schedule III, there is no need for any further assessment or benchmarking of products required in order for DPOs to deploy them within their networks. At most the regulator can “recommend” some preferred products, but there should not be any limit to DPOs being able to purchase or even build their own solutions subject to the requirements specified in Schedule III being met,” it comments. 

    IMCL also highlights that migrating to a new SMS platform as selected by TRAI would result in heavy costs being incurred, customisations having to be re-built into any new platform and large migration exercises to move customers to the new platform. Hence, its portals or mobile applications that are built to support LCOs, MSOs, subscribers and engineering staff would all need to be re-built in order to work with a new SMS platform. This change will result in essentially re-building the business from scratch taking away the business from other revenue-generating activities. 

  • Amid uncertainty over NTO 2.0, DPOs start complying with new NCF

    Amid uncertainty over NTO 2.0, DPOs start complying with new NCF

    MUMBAI: The amended new tariff order (NTO 2.0) comes into effect from today (1 March) amid ongoing legal battles. Although most of the broadcasters have not published their updated Reference Interconnect Offers (RIOs), many of the distribution platform operators (DPOs) have started complying with the regulations bringing change in network capacity fee (NCF).

    Along with other amendments, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) had brought changes in number of channels permitted in Network Capacity Fee (NCF) and applicable NCF for multi TV homes. The authority also reduced the maximum NCF charge to Rs 130 (excluding taxes) for 200 channels. It also added that NCF for more than two hundred SD channels, should not exceed Rs 160.

    “The network capacity fee, per month, for each additional TV connection, beyond the first TV connection in a multi TV home shall, in no case, exceed forty percent of the declared network capacity fee,” it added.

    Tata Sky has also declared its updated NCF. The DTH operator will now charge Rs 153.40 per month for the first 200 SD channels, inclusive of all taxes and Rs 188.80 per month for more than 200 SD channels, inclusive of all taxes. For each secondary connection, it has fixed a NCF of Rs 61.36 per month for the first 200 SD channels, inclusive of all taxes, Rs 75.52 per month for more than 200 SD channels, inclusive of all taxes.

    Airtel Digital TV will charge now the same amount as Tata Sky is charging. However, it is charging Rs 52 ( without taxes) for the primary connection and Additional NCF of Rs 30 (taxes extra) for more than 200 channels.

    “The network capacity fee, per month, payable by a subscriber (each set top box) for 200 SD channels is Rs 130. The NCF, per month, payable by a subscriber (each set top box) for more than 200 SD channels is Rs 160. For determination of channel count 1 HD channel is equivalent to 2 SD channels as per regulations,” Siti Networks stated.

    “The television channels notified by the central government shall be mandatorily available to all the subscribers and shall be in addition to the number of channels available in the network capacity fee. Network capacity fee, per month for each additional TV connection, beyond the first TV connection in a multi TV home shall be forty per cent of the network capacity fee of the Parent STB. The STB with maximum number of channels would be treated as Parent STB,” it added.

    Moreover, IndusInd Media & Communications Ltd (IMCL) has mentioned in its website that pricing of some of its packages will be revised downwards with effect from 1 March. It has also mentioned about the new NCF.

  • MSOs share different outlooks on impact of NTO 2.0

    MSOs share different outlooks on impact of NTO 2.0

    MUMBAI: All the stakeholders of the broadcasting sector had a tough time coping with the new tariff order (NTO), which was implemented last year. While TRAI brought amendments to the new price regime, touted as NTO 2.0, on 1 January, it has again sent tremors across the industry. The changes have irked broadcasters but multi system operators (MSOs) have different opinions on NTO 2.0’s impact.

    The NTO had a drastic impact on the players in the cable industry resulting in a dip in subscriber base. However, Siti Networks nodal officer for broadband and video verticals Vishwa Bandhu Sharma feels that the new provisions will not disrupt MSOs again.

    He told Indiantelevision.com, “There was a lot of subscriber loss when NTO 1 came in effect. Multi-TV homes stopped using their second and third TV sets. But with NTO 2.0, we are expecting them to activate those TV sets again.”

    Speaking about the impact that the reduction of prices will have on the industry, Sharma shared that the ARPU would remain more or less the same because of the discount on the NCF. He said that he is expecting people to move to more a-la-carte selections for channels that have good content but are not a part of the new bouquets.

    While Sharma believes that MSOs will benefit from NTO 2.0, one of the major MSOs, not willing to be named, opined that the changes will affect the top and bottom lines of both MSOs and local cable operators (LCOs).

    “Discount of 60 per cent on additional TV will result in revenue loss for both MSO and LCO. The loss will be 12-15 per cent and will reflect in the top line and bottom line. Even if 10 per cent STBs (second TV) are recovered, the loss will be 8-10 per cent,” the executive from the other MSO stated.

    TRAI also said in the amended regulation that broadcasters shall not be permitted to give any discount for adoption of bouquets to DPOs in the 15 per cent category as permitted in Interconnection Regulations 2017. According to the executive, this will result in the reduction in bottom line of the MSOs. Additionally, it will increase disputes between the broadcasters and MSOs.

    While DD channels have been excluded from NCF, the executive said: “We have invested in infrastructure for building channel capacity and delivering it to subscribers. We cannot charge placement from the government but our right to charge NCF subscriber should not be withdrawn.”

    Siti Network’s Sharma also added, “When broadcasters were given a chance to rework their prices, they took it to the maximum level and also charged a premium rate. They also included their low base channels in the bouquets, even with bouquet price at 50-60 per cent off. Of course, it (NTO 2.0) will be a disadvantage because now to include those channels in the bouquet, they will have to reduce the price or they will have to leave the channel out for a-la-carte selection. People will not be subscribing to lesser popular channels, and that’s why they are not happy.”