Tag: Revenue

  • Over 60 per cent growth in worldwide OTT video revenue in 2012, ABI Research

    Over 60 per cent growth in worldwide OTT video revenue in 2012, ABI Research

    MUMBAI: Companies like Netflix, Hulu, Apple, and Amazon have helped drive the over-the-top (OTT) video market past $8 billion in 2012. The three largest markets-North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific-experienced year-on-year (YoY) growth in excess of 50 per cent in 2012. The continued spread of connected CE and increasingly mobile devices, like tablets, are expected to push the market past $20 billion by 2015, according to ABI Research.

    ABI Research senior analyst Michael Inouye said, “The shift to digital and OTT distribution is accelerating, particularly as content providers increasingly warm up to these channels. While Pay-TV services are still afforded many advantages we are approaching the proverbial fork in the road when content owners will decide if they continue down the same path or forge ahead, shaking up the primary means of media distribution as we‘ve known it.”

    The dynamics around revenue generation continue to change and currently vary by region (e.g. subscriptions more significant in North America than Europe or Asia-Pacific). In time, however, we expect a greater diffusion of revenue across the various business models. For instance, in 2012 58 per cent of OTT video revenue came from subscription service, but we anticipate this share to fall to less than 32 58 per cent by 2018. In large part this is driven by a continual shift in consumer demand towards newer forms of digital content distribution.

    ABI Research practice director, Sam Rosen said, “While we still see great value and strength in the Pay-TV sector we are also starting to see the pieces that will accelerate change fall into place .”Whether it‘s Netflix expanding to International markets or ABC and CBS enhancing catch-up services the building blocks that will restructure the how, when, and where consumers view content are starting to give shape to a new media future. This future, however, isn‘t devoid of traditional media nor is it a matter of new channels necessarily winning, but rather a redistribution of wealth within the value chain.”

  • Bollywood under stress as producers, plexes fight over revenue share

    The corporatisation of Bollywood helped clean ‘underworld‘ connections to a certain extent but it also created two new power centers – the producers and the multiplex owners.

    While both the moviegoer and the industry welcomed the advent of the multiplex, the euphoria didn‘t last for long. With the amount of business the multiplexes were doing, big-time producers wanted a raise in the revenue-share. The revenue-sharing topic has always been a matter of attention every time a Yash Raj banner film or one from a reputed banner came up for release.

    Till then multiplexes were passing on only 48 per cent to distributors when it should have been more, given the tax break. The Chopras, with some alleged arm-twisting, managed to get 2 per cent more even pre-Fanaa but this still left multiplex owners with a much higher profit margin than single-screen theatres.

    Recent revenue-sharing story

    The recent tiff between the producers and multiplexes started as early as February. While the producers were insisting on a 50 per cent revenue share for the first three weeks, the multiplexes were offering 50, 40 and 30 per cent revenue share for the same.

    After several failed discussions, the producers decided to go on strike and from 4 April they stopped giving release rights of new big-budget movies to multiplexes.

    After a month-long silence, both parties met on 5 May but nothing fruitful came out of the meeting.

    Not seeing any chance of the ice thawing, producers decided to release films in single-screens and independent multiplexes from 29 May. One of the films that were to be released was Vashu Bhagnani‘s Kal Kissne Dekha, the debut film of his son Jaccky.

    Later at a meeting held on 18 May, there was an underlying feeling that things would be sorted out at the meeting with the presence of multiplex owners like PVR‘s Ajay Bijli and Cinemax‘s Rashesh Kanakia along with Adlabs‘ Anil Arjun who have, prior to this, never attended any meeting besides Fame India‘s Shravan Shroff, Inox Leisure‘s Deepak Ashar and Fun Cinemas‘ Atul Goel. Representing the United Producers and Distributors Forum (UPDF) were Mukesh Bhatt, UTV‘s Ronnie Screwvala, Yash Raj Films‘ Sahdev Ghei, Eros International‘s Nandu Ahuja and Studio 18‘s Aman Gill.

    While the 50:50 revenue sharing terms for the first week were agreed upon, the bone of contention was the second and third week. The UPDF wanted terms which were a notch higher than the 42.5 and 32.5 per cent respectively. This meeting too didn‘t yield any result.

    On 23 May, the core committee of the UPDF met at the Yash Raj Studios where Yash Chopra, Vidhu Vinod Chopra, Aditya Chopra, Aamir Khan and Shah Rukh Khan met the rest of their fraternity to reach a consensus on the situation. The outcome was that they should not succumb to the multiplexes‘ demands, if any. The situation looks grim and to say the least has resulted in a deadlock. It was this day when Bhagnani backed out from releasing his film in single-screens fearing loss.

    On May 26 both parties met again. Just when they were getting closer to agreeing on the revenue-sharing terms, the issue of distribution strategy reared its head.

    Multiplexes want the content for all their properties, thus increasing the burden of print cost on the producers and in turn hampering the success of smaller films. Producers are now on course to chalk out their own distribution strategy for films which is the norm worldwide.

    “Giving the multiplexes the right to distribute films will kill the distribution business. If multiplexes think they can do distribution, then they should pay minimum guarantees. Moreover a big budget movie and a small budget movie cannot have the same distribution strategy,” says producer Harry Baweja of the Producers and Distributors Forum.

    Overview

    The disagreement between the two parties is being skeptically looked upon by industry professionals in the chain.

    Says 24 Karat Multiplex CEO Padam Sacheti, ” The strike period is a bane for us. It is loss all the way. I suggest both parties should keep their egos aside and work towards resolving the issue.”

    Though producers do not face any immediate financial losses, the release dates for several big budget projects have been disrupted. These include UTV‘s Main aur Mrs Khanna and Kaminey, Kal Kissne Dekha, Boney Kapoor‘s Wanted, Eros International‘s Aladin and Sajid Nadiadwala‘s Kambakkth Ishq. Almost Rs 2.5 billion has been blocked due to the delay in the release of these films.

    Says UTV Motion Pictures CEO Siddharth Roy Kapur, “Well I think films will release at some point or the other, hence for the producers there isn‘t really any loss technically. Delay doesn‘t hamper big films. It is only that the money gets blocked. The real time to worry would be when a lot of films will have to be released in rapid succession once the strike is lifted. Till that time there isn‘t any loss that the producers are incurring, I think the loss is primarily with the multiplexes, because every week that they lose, is a week lost in revenue.”

    The losses are indeed hurting multiplexes hard. “I would assume the loss to be to the tune of Rs 150,000 to Rs 200,000 a day per cinema,” says Fun Cinemas COO Vishal Kapur. “Talking about the occupancies, if earlier we would do 35 to 40 per cent of the available capacity, we are currently doing about 15 per cent,” he adds.

    The upcoming T20 world cup is also likely to hamper new releases and even if the strike is called off, big films will release July onwards.

    “It has been our stand for some time now. If there is no resolution soon, UTV will start releasing its big and small films in single theatres and non-national multiplexes from July onwards. We are working on the dates of releases of these films and they would be announced shortly,” says Siddharth Roy Kapur.

    Multiplex owners are mum on their losses due to the content blackout. But according to Indiantelevision.com estimates, the losses are close to Rs 2 billion. It is difficult to put a figure to the losses incurred by film producers due to the deference of their releases, some of whom have borrowed at exorbitant rates. The industry has also to figure out a smooth release window after the row between the producers and plex owners end.

    “A fatigue element seems to be building up. Both the parties are under financial stress and an amicable settlement would ease some of this pain. But there are structural issues that have to be sorted out on a long-term basis so that the revenue pie grows for all the stakeholders,” says an analyst who has been tracking the sector.

     

  • Revenue for Canada’s private TV stations up four per cent

    Revenue for Canada’s private TV stations up four per cent

    MUMBAI: The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has released its annual report with statistical and financial data on conventional Canadian private television stations for 2001-2005.Overall, these stations remain profitable, and posted increased revenues and profits over this period.

    From 2004 to 2005, total revenue and profit before interest and taxes for private television stations rose by close to four per cent coming in at $2.2 billion and $242.2 million respectively in 2005. The ad revenues for these stations grew by nearly five per cent, totalling $1.5 billion, while local time sales decreased by 1.1 per cent to $362.9 million.

    Overall, broadcasters’ operating expenses increased by 4.3 per cent from 2004 to 2005, reaching $1.9 billion in 2005. Of that amount, $1.3 billion was invested in acquiring and producing programming, including $587 million for Canadian programmes. This figure includes the $138.5 million that broadcasters paid to independent producers in order to acquire programming.

    Private broadcasters’ spending on Canadian programmes included $86.6 million for drama, $310.2 million for news programs, $59.4 million for other information programs, $83.1 million for general interest programming, and $29.2 million for musical and variety shows.

    The report was produced using the financial summaries of private Canadian television undertakings. It also provides data from the CBC’s financial summaries. It is the first in a series of reports on broadcasting that the CRTC publishes every year in order to inform interested parties of the current financial situation of this industry in Canada.