Tag: Reference Interconnect Order

  • JioStar revamps sports channel  and FTA portfolio

    JioStar revamps sports channel and FTA portfolio

    MUMBAI: JioStar has announced significant changes to its channel lineup, effective 15 March 2025, according to its latest reference interconnect order published on 13 February.

    The broadcaster is rebranding its Sports18 channels under the Star Sports banner. Sports18 1 will become Star Sports 2 Hindi, whilst Sports18 2 and 3 will be rebranded as Star Sports 2 Telugu and Tamil, respectively. Star Sports First will be renamed Star Sports 2 Kannada, and Sports18 Khel will become Star Sports Khel.

    Two new high-definition channels, Star Sports 2 Tamil HD and Star Sports 2 Telugu HD, will launch on 15 March. All sports channels will be priced at RS 19 for consumers.

    The company has also updated its free-to-air package, which now includes Colors Rishtey, Star Utsav, Star Utsav Movies, Colors Cineplex Bollywood, Colors Cineplex Superhits, and News 18 India. 

    Anyone interested in downloading the latest updates from JioStar can do so by clicking on the links below: 

    Application for request of signals of STAR Channels DOWNLOAD PDF
    Form for Amendment of Subscribed Channels and Subscribed Bouquets DOWNLOAD PDF
    Form for Amendment of Territory DOWNLOAD PDF
    Rate Card DOWNLOAD PDF
  • JioStar, Zee and Sony release new channel and bouquet pricing

    JioStar, Zee and Sony release new channel and bouquet pricing

    MUMBAI: It’s that time of the year when broadcasters disclose how much the distribution platform operators will have to pay for the channels they pipe into Indian TV homes. The three major networks JioStar, Zee and Sony Pictures Networks India have rolled out their reference interconnect orders  (Rios) regarding the broadcast tariffs that cable ops, DTH ops and IPTV players have to cough up for 2025. At first glance, it appears s if broadcasters have been reasonable in their rate increases by hiking channel prices between five and 15 per cent on the higher side. And quite a few channel prices have been maintained as well. The rates become effective 1 February 2025.

    Let’s begin with JioStar.Its 134 channel offering after the merger of Star and Jio definitely looks impressive. As do the number of packs its distribution team has come up with: 83 in all packs, which includes 85 standard definition channels, 44 HD channels, five FTA channels. The bouquets also include 19 news channels from Network 18, infotainment channels from both National Geographic and AETN18, general entertainment channels in various languages from both Star and Colors, kids channels (including Disney), music channels (MTV and Maa Music), regional language channels and of course above all sports channels in various languages.

    On an a la carte basis, JioStar’s channels in various languages in standard definition have been priced at between Rs 25 (for Maa TV and Colors Kannada respectively)  and 10 paise (all its news channels).

    Its HD channels are priced between Rs 25 a(Maa HD, Star Plus HD, Vijay HD, Colors Kannada and Asianet) and 10 paise(VH1 HD, MTV Beats HD and MTV HD). .

    On the bundle side, its cheapest pack, apart from the free to air channels, is at     Rs 17 for the Disney Kids SD pack with the most expensive one being the Star Premium Pack Marathi Lite Hindi HD at Rs 240.

    The  Star Value Pack  SD Hindi pack,  priced at Rs 110 has 30 channels including both Star Plus and Colors, a chunk of news channels, movie channels, infotainment channels, kids channels – but no Disney – the sports channels Star Sports 1 Hindi, Sports 18, and Star Sports 3. The Star Premium Pack Lite Hindi HD which is priced at Rs 210 has 43 channels, including seven sports channels, Colors HD but no Star Plus.

    The broadcaster has built clever packs which are a mix of regional language channels only and it has also mixed regional languages to create special packs and regional language channels with its  Hindi channels to create even more niche packs to meet the requirement of nomadic domestic Indians.

    Network Status Action
     JioStar if you already have an agreement  click here  
      if you are new to Jiostar and want one click here
    Zee TV To get the Zee updated RIO form  click here
    Sony Pictures Networks India to get the a la carte pricing  click here
      to get the Happy India bouquet pricing  click here
    Source: networks and Indiantelevision.com 

    Let’s now take a look at Zee. Zee has kept the number of packs limited to 30 and it’s a la carte rates are also pretty much simpler. It’s mainline general entertainment channels in every language apart from Malayalam have been kept at a price of Rs 19 (Zee TV Hindi, Zee TV Marathi, Zee Bangla, Zee Sarthak, Zee Telugu and Zee Kannada). Zee Keralam, however, has been priced at Rs 10 on a la carte basis. Its movie channels have been kept between a band of Rs 19 (Zee Cinema) and 10 paise (Zee Classic). It has priced most of its HD channels at Rs 19 with the lowest one priced at Rs 3 (& prive HD).

    Zee TV has bundled its regional language channel packs at a higher price than its Hindi ones. For instance, the Zee all-in-one pack Hindi HD has a sticker price of Rs 89 while its all-in-one Telugu and Tamil packs are priced at Rs 120.It has also thrown in penetration incentives if the distribution platform operators place the channels in the preferred LCN number that are agreed upon between Zee and the DPO.

    Now on to Sony Pictures Networks India (SPNI). SPNI has increased the a la carte pricing for some of its  channels, while keeping them steady for others. For example, Sony Wah  which was priced at Rs 0.1, is now priced at Rs 1. Similarly, Sony Max 2 has increased to Rs 2 from Rs 1, and Sony Sports Ten 4 is now priced at Rs 19, up from Rs 17. Additionally, the pricing for bouquets has been revised which has gone up  between four per cent and 12 per cent. The Happy India Smart – Hindi pack is now priced at Rs 54 (previously Rs 48), while the Happy India Smart – Marathi pack is now priced at Rs 56 (previously Rs 51). The Happy Smart Bangla too has risen from 51 to Rs 56 but with the channel Max 1 being added to it.

    Hopefully, these marginal price revisions don’t start a battle between the  cable TV and DTH fraternity and broadcasters like they did the last time in 2023 when broadcasters had to resort to switch offs because cable TV operators resisted. The DPOs must remember the price of almost everything has gone up: the rupee is at Rs 85, potatoes are at Rs 60 and even petrol is at a high.

    Already, consumers are turning away from cable TV and DTH as is evident in the drop in the number of subscribers in the past six months. For the sake of the entire cable and satellite TV industry, the entire trade must work together and not battle against each other. Otherwise, the number of cord cutters and cord-nevers will only increase. And along with it, the tribe of streamers. 

  • Cable TV price may reduce as TRAI issues tariff, QofS, interconnect regulations after SC nod

    MUMBAI: Cable TV prices are now expected to reduce after Telecom Regulatory Authority of India yesterday issued a series of orders relating to digital addressable systems.

    Broadcast carriage regulator TRAI had lined up a slew of guidelines relating to tariff, quality of service and interconnections, including proposing maximum retail price (MRP) for channels being bundled in genre-wise bouquets, freeing unbundled premium channels of  price caps and reining in the last mile cable operator (LCO) from breaching revenue-gravy trail.

    Sources in TRAI had indicated the regulator had favoured introducing MRP for TV channels that broadcasters offer in a bouquet to MSOs so the prices could be conveyed to a consumer in a transparent manner for him to make an empowered choice. Though broadcasting companies do submit annually a-la-carte rates of their respective channels to TRAI, the regulator was of the opinion that a consumer doesn’t ultimately get to choose the channel of his choice transparently.

    Following the green signal from the Supreme Court yesterday morning, TRAI issued a series of orders relating to digital addressable systems.

    Apart from the Tariff order which had been issued on 10 October last year, the regulator also issued the DAS Interconnect Regulations which had been issued on 14 October last year, and the Standards of Quality of Service and Consumer Protection (Digital Addressable Systems) Regulations which had been issued on 10 October last year.

    In separate press releases, TRAI said the three documents issued in October last year were in draft form. Earlier, the regulator had issued consultation papers on the issues and finalized the regulations after receiving responses from stakeholders and open house discussions, the final regulations have been issued. The regulations had been issued after However, a cursory glance shows that the regulator has stuck to its draft with some incidental changes.

    The orders can be seen at:

    http://trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/Tariff_Order_English_3%20March_2017.pdf

    http://www.trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/QOS_Regulation_03_03_2017.pdf

    http://www.trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/Interconnection_Regulation_03_mar_2917.pdf

    Earlier, both Star India and Vijay TV had filed a petition in Madras High Court under the Copyright Act on the ground that TRAI could not issue orders that would affect content but could only issue regulations relating to distribution and other matters.

    After the High Court stayed all orders issued by it, TRAI appealed to the Supreme Court which this morning said that TRAI was free to issue its orders. However, it said the case in the High Court would continue and would have to be completed within sixty days.

    Both channels were also given leave to amend their petitions in the event of TRAI issuing any orders.

    Also read:

    TRAI tariff & quality of services regulations

    TRAI issues comprehensive interconnect draft guidelines

    Offer Premium channels as a la carte, don’t bundle: TRAI

  • TRAI issues comprehensive interconnect draft guidelines

    TRAI issues comprehensive interconnect draft guidelines

    NEW DELHI: Indian broadcast regulator came out today with its third set of draft guidelines within five days — this time on interconnection issues. With an aim to bring about more uniformity and transparency in the broadcast carriage sector, TRAI attempts to tackle spiralling carriage cost, rampant discount schemes and uneven agreements between stakeholders, while creating room for distribution cost reimbursement.

    As often reiterated by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), TRAI said no broadcaster will provide signals of pay television channels to a distributor of television channels without entering into a written interconnection agreement with such a distributor of television channels.

    In the draft regulations, called the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection (Addressable Systems) Regulations, 2016, published by TRAI today, the regulator said all broadcasters and distributors (DPOs) will publish on their websites a draft reference interconnection offer (RIO) for providing signals of all its pay television channels to a distributor of television channels within 30 days of commencement of these regulations or before launching of a pay television channel, in conformance with the provisions of the regulations and tariff orders notified by it.

    It also said that every broadcaster shall offer all television channels on a-la-carte basis to distributor of television channels. But it will be open to a broadcaster to offer its pay channels (in addition to offering of channels on a-la-carte basis) in form of bouquets.

    The draft inter-connect guidelines have been prepared after keeping in view the various orders and litigations pending in TDSAT or courts arising out of disputes between broadcasters and distributors or local cable broadcasters.

    Stakeholders have been asked to respond to the draft by 28 October 2016, with the year-end deadline for the final switch-off of analogue signals under the Digital Addressable Systems (DAS) less than three months away.   

    Interestingly, TRAI also dwells on carriage & placement fee — something that broadcasters have been saying is a growing menace hitting their bottomline — and discounts indicating how the issue can be tackled. 

    No carriage fee is to be paid by a broadcaster if the subscription of the channel is more than or equal to 20 per cent of the subscriber base. The rate of carriage fee has been capped at 20 paisa per channel per subscriber per month and the fee amount (charged by DPOs from TV channels) will decrease with increase in subscription numbers.

    In what could lead to some serious work in arithmetic, TRAI has suggested the distributors of TV channels may offer discounts on the carriage fee rate declared by them not exceeding 35 per cent of the rate of the carriage fee declared. Further, broadcaster can offer to a distributor a minimum of 20 per cent of the maximum retail price (MRP) of its pay channels or bouquets of pay channels as distribution fee. TV channels may also offer discounts on the MRP, provided that the sum of discounts and distribution fee in no case shall exceed 35 per cent of the declared MRP.

    The carriage fee payable by a broadcaster to the distributor under the interconnection agreement shall be calculated on the basis of the rate of carriage fee and the discounts offered in the reference interconnection offer. The term of the interconnection agreement will in no case be less than one year from the date of commencement of the agreement.

    The Authority suo-motu or otherwise may examine the reference interconnection offer submitted by a distributor of television channels and may modify the reference interconnection offer with the distributor amending the RIO accordingly and publish the same within fifteen days of receipt of the direction, if the Authority is of the opinion that the RIO has not been prepared in conformance with the provisions of the regulations and the tariff orders notified by the Authority.

    Pointing out that the new draft has attempted to keep the basic principles of non-exclusivity, non-discrimination, transparency, level playing field and fair competition in mind, TRAI said there should be a common interconnection framework for all addressable systems, DTH, HITS, DAS and IPTV.

    The “Must carry” provision for all addressable systems on first come first serve basis has been provided for and distributors have been asked to publish information about its platform, including available capacity and declare the rate of carriage fee.

    It will be mandatory for service providers to reduce the terms and conditions of all their interconnection agreements to writing and no service provider will provide for any clause in an interconnection agreement with the other service provider which would require, directly or indirectly, the latter to pay a minimum guaranteed amount.

    Furthermore, no broadcaster will provide signals of pay television channels to a distributor of television channels without entering into a written interconnection agreement with such distributor of television channels.

    The regulator said no broadcaster will provide for any clause, directly or indirectly, in an interconnection agreement with a distributor of TV channels which require such distributor to include the channels or bouquets of pay TV channels in any particular bouquet of channels offered by such distributor to the subscribers.

    A broadcaster may sign the interconnection agreement with distributors of TV channels for a-la-carte pay TV channels or bouquets of pay television channels of its subsidiary company or holding company or subsidiary company of the holding company which has obtained, in its name, the down-linking permission for its television channels from the Government, after written authorization by them.

    Every broadcaster will enter into a new written interconnection agreement with distributors of TV channels before the expiry of the existing interconnection agreement and notice of this will be given to the distributor at least 60 days prior to the date of expiry.

    The agreement between a broadcaster and a multi system operator (MSO) will include the details for describing the territory for the purpose of distribution of signals of television channels containing the registered area of operation of the MSO as mentioned in the registration granted by the Government. Provisions relating to territory covered or agreements between an MSO and LCO will not affect the direct-to-home platforms.

    The full draft guidelines could be accessed at http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/WhatsNew/Documents/Interconnection_Regulation_14_10_2016.pdf

    Also Read:   TRAI on carriage fee, other issues in draft interconnect guidelines

  • TRAI issues comprehensive interconnect draft guidelines

    TRAI issues comprehensive interconnect draft guidelines

    NEW DELHI: Indian broadcast regulator came out today with its third set of draft guidelines within five days — this time on interconnection issues. With an aim to bring about more uniformity and transparency in the broadcast carriage sector, TRAI attempts to tackle spiralling carriage cost, rampant discount schemes and uneven agreements between stakeholders, while creating room for distribution cost reimbursement.

    As often reiterated by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), TRAI said no broadcaster will provide signals of pay television channels to a distributor of television channels without entering into a written interconnection agreement with such a distributor of television channels.

    In the draft regulations, called the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection (Addressable Systems) Regulations, 2016, published by TRAI today, the regulator said all broadcasters and distributors (DPOs) will publish on their websites a draft reference interconnection offer (RIO) for providing signals of all its pay television channels to a distributor of television channels within 30 days of commencement of these regulations or before launching of a pay television channel, in conformance with the provisions of the regulations and tariff orders notified by it.

    It also said that every broadcaster shall offer all television channels on a-la-carte basis to distributor of television channels. But it will be open to a broadcaster to offer its pay channels (in addition to offering of channels on a-la-carte basis) in form of bouquets.

    The draft inter-connect guidelines have been prepared after keeping in view the various orders and litigations pending in TDSAT or courts arising out of disputes between broadcasters and distributors or local cable broadcasters.

    Stakeholders have been asked to respond to the draft by 28 October 2016, with the year-end deadline for the final switch-off of analogue signals under the Digital Addressable Systems (DAS) less than three months away.   

    Interestingly, TRAI also dwells on carriage & placement fee — something that broadcasters have been saying is a growing menace hitting their bottomline — and discounts indicating how the issue can be tackled. 

    No carriage fee is to be paid by a broadcaster if the subscription of the channel is more than or equal to 20 per cent of the subscriber base. The rate of carriage fee has been capped at 20 paisa per channel per subscriber per month and the fee amount (charged by DPOs from TV channels) will decrease with increase in subscription numbers.

    In what could lead to some serious work in arithmetic, TRAI has suggested the distributors of TV channels may offer discounts on the carriage fee rate declared by them not exceeding 35 per cent of the rate of the carriage fee declared. Further, broadcaster can offer to a distributor a minimum of 20 per cent of the maximum retail price (MRP) of its pay channels or bouquets of pay channels as distribution fee. TV channels may also offer discounts on the MRP, provided that the sum of discounts and distribution fee in no case shall exceed 35 per cent of the declared MRP.

    The carriage fee payable by a broadcaster to the distributor under the interconnection agreement shall be calculated on the basis of the rate of carriage fee and the discounts offered in the reference interconnection offer. The term of the interconnection agreement will in no case be less than one year from the date of commencement of the agreement.

    The Authority suo-motu or otherwise may examine the reference interconnection offer submitted by a distributor of television channels and may modify the reference interconnection offer with the distributor amending the RIO accordingly and publish the same within fifteen days of receipt of the direction, if the Authority is of the opinion that the RIO has not been prepared in conformance with the provisions of the regulations and the tariff orders notified by the Authority.

    Pointing out that the new draft has attempted to keep the basic principles of non-exclusivity, non-discrimination, transparency, level playing field and fair competition in mind, TRAI said there should be a common interconnection framework for all addressable systems, DTH, HITS, DAS and IPTV.

    The “Must carry” provision for all addressable systems on first come first serve basis has been provided for and distributors have been asked to publish information about its platform, including available capacity and declare the rate of carriage fee.

    It will be mandatory for service providers to reduce the terms and conditions of all their interconnection agreements to writing and no service provider will provide for any clause in an interconnection agreement with the other service provider which would require, directly or indirectly, the latter to pay a minimum guaranteed amount.

    Furthermore, no broadcaster will provide signals of pay television channels to a distributor of television channels without entering into a written interconnection agreement with such distributor of television channels.

    The regulator said no broadcaster will provide for any clause, directly or indirectly, in an interconnection agreement with a distributor of TV channels which require such distributor to include the channels or bouquets of pay TV channels in any particular bouquet of channels offered by such distributor to the subscribers.

    A broadcaster may sign the interconnection agreement with distributors of TV channels for a-la-carte pay TV channels or bouquets of pay television channels of its subsidiary company or holding company or subsidiary company of the holding company which has obtained, in its name, the down-linking permission for its television channels from the Government, after written authorization by them.

    Every broadcaster will enter into a new written interconnection agreement with distributors of TV channels before the expiry of the existing interconnection agreement and notice of this will be given to the distributor at least 60 days prior to the date of expiry.

    The agreement between a broadcaster and a multi system operator (MSO) will include the details for describing the territory for the purpose of distribution of signals of television channels containing the registered area of operation of the MSO as mentioned in the registration granted by the Government. Provisions relating to territory covered or agreements between an MSO and LCO will not affect the direct-to-home platforms.

    The full draft guidelines could be accessed at http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/WhatsNew/Documents/Interconnection_Regulation_14_10_2016.pdf

    Also Read:   TRAI on carriage fee, other issues in draft interconnect guidelines

  • Star India commits to renew agreements with MSOs only on basis of RIO, hearing concludes

    Star India commits to renew agreements with MSOs only on basis of RIO, hearing concludes

    NEW DELHI: Judgment was reserved today by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) in the ‘deep-rooted’ dispute between Hathway and Taj TV, after the hearing that commenced on 25 August and continued on a day-to-day basis.

     

    Before the Tribunal reserved its order, Star India filed an affidavit in which it said it would ‘henceforth’ enter into agreements under the Reference Interconnect Order on a year-to-year basis with all multi-system operators.

     

    It said the RIO would commence three months after the expiry of the erstwhile agreement and would only be on the basis of a published RIO.

     

    It also said it will sign any new agreement on cost per subscriber basis with MSOs operating at national level.

     

    However, it listed eight MSOs working at regional or state level with which it already has CPS agreements and said these will continue for the term for which they are valid and thus last the full term.

     

    The eight MSOs are Inspire Infotech of Delhi, Novabase Digital Entertainment of Delhi, E-Infrastructure and Entertainment, Bangalore, Satellite Channels, Poona Cables Systems and Services of Pune, Sky Channel of Delhi, Home Cable Networks of Chittore District in Andhra Pradesh and City TV of Coimbatore.

     

    In reply to certain queries by the Tribunal in reference to the statement made in paragraph-3 of the affidavit, Star India counsel Saikrishna on instructions received from duly authorised officers present in court stated that in DAS notified areas, any new interconnect agreement with any MSOs operating under a national license or a regional/local license would only be on the basis of the RIO of M/s Star India Pvt. Ltd. and it would not enter into any interconnect agreement in the DAS areas with anyone on fixed fee or on CPS basis for a period of one year.

     

    Primarily, the Tribunal would have to decide on two matters: the first is an interpretation of the date of renewal under Clause 5(16) of the Telecom (Digital Addressable Systems) Interconnect Regulations relating to renewal of agreements, and the other is about the rates according to the arguments put forth by the various parties.

     

    Earlier, counsel Tejveer Singh Bhatia who had been asked by TDSAT chairman Aftab Alam and member Kuldip Singh to assist the Tribunal in clarifying certain issues said the Regulations were clear that if certain channels were provided to one MSO, they had to be provided to any other MSO that asked for them. However, this did not mean that the terms would be the same for all MSOs.

     

    Furthermore, even if channels were put in bouquets, the rates could not be the same as some were regional channels meant for specific areas and others were national channels and the charges would depend on eyeballs. Hence, the negotiation may differ from region to region. But this also meant creation of RIO agreements for every region depending on number of eyeballs.

     

    He also claimed that the Interconnect Regulations allowed him to change the terms and conditions from time to time.

     

    But he was categorical that a RIO could not be thrust upon him as it was only an offer. Clause 5(10) provides the remedy in case the broadcaster turns down a RIO agreement.

     

    He said that the ‘must carry; clause did not mean automatically that the broadcaster will be paid for every channel he beams. It would depend to the number of channels that the subscriber decides to take.

     

    During the hearing, the Tribunal heard various counsel on behalf of Taj TV and Zee TV, Star India, Hathway, Bhaskar (MSO) from Jabalpur and Scod, an MSO from Mumbai and Navi Mumbai.

     

    When listing the case for 25 August, the Tribunal had said: “Unfortunately, the dispute between the two sides is playing out in highly aggressive way and one may add in a rather unpleasant manner. It seems to be affecting a large number of people in viewing their favourite TV channels. The disputants themselves are approaching the Tribunal on a weekly basis complaining against the actions of each other and seeking some interim directions of the Tribunal consuming a lot of time on arguments on miscellaneous applications.”

     

    The Tribunal noted that both sides had assured that they would avoid issuing the offensive advertisements against each other.

     

    In the order last month, the Tribunal directed Taj TV to file their respective replies in petitions nos.319(C) of 2014 and 47(C) of 2014 and asked Hathway to file its rejoinder.

     

    The Tribunal noted that the dispute has arisen at a stage when the earlier fixed fee agreement between the parties has come to end and they are unable to come to agreed terms for a fresh agreement and under the circumstances the MSO has no option but to take the broadcasters’ channels on their RIO terms.