Tag: Piracy

  • Star India files 100 plus FIRs against pay channels piracy in Karnataka, AP, MP

    Star India files 100 plus FIRs against pay channels piracy in Karnataka, AP, MP

    MUMBAI:  Continuing its no-tolerance stand against illegal transmission/re-transmission of Pay TV Channels by cable operators indulging in piracy of STAR TV Signals, officials of Star TV filed complaints against cable operators in Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh, which led to police raids on their premises, arrests and seizures of equipment.  The raids were conducted at the control rooms of RST Digital (Karnataka), Ganesh Communication (AP) and Tanishq Communications (MP), who were found indulging in illegal transmission/re-transmission of the Star Pay Channels. (Details of initial investigations and action taken, below)

    Over the last 12 months, Star India’s anti-piracy campaign has resulted in 100+ FIRs against pirating networks across the country.

    The rampant issue of piracy in India has deprived the broadcast industry of reach as well as revenue worth thousands of crores. It is widely believed that the Piracy menace impacts the Television medium the most with cable operators under-reporting their subscribers as well as indulging in illegal transmission/re-transmission of the Pay Channels, resulting in significant losses to the broadcasters as well as the government exchequer. 

    While the implementation of Digitally Addressable Systems (DAS) in the country will be a big corrective and preventive step, the implementation of DAS all over the country is yet to be done. In the interim, Star India, since the last few years, has adopted a policy of “zero tolerance” against operators indulging in illegal transmission/re-transmission of the Star Pay Channels.

    STAR TV’s proactive steps are expected to reap significant benefits for the entire broadcast industry. 

    Here are the details on the raids conducted by Star India – 

    Karnataka

    Initial investigations

    Star India conducted discreet investigations at Kakarla town and identified that RST digital (located at No.64/8, Simaz Complex, Taluk Office, Karkala, Udupi District, Karnataka, India- 574104), which has a subscriber base of over 2500 households, was indulging in piracy through DTH. The operator was carrying illegal signals of Star India channels Star Plus, Star Sports 1, Life Ok, Suvarna & Asianet, along with Sony, Zee and Colors channels.

    RST Digital has monopoly in the Karkala region and so far not allowed any new network to set up a control room in this region. It is rumored to have high connections with the ruling political party in chair.

    Action taken

    Post the initial investigations, Star India officials filed a First Information Report (FIR no. 135/2016 dated 25.05.2016) against RST Digital at Karkala Police Station, under section 379 of IPC r/w Sections 37,51,63,65,69 of the Copyright Act, which resulted in a raid at the premises of the operator. During the raid, the operator resisted police entry into the control room and arguments were exchanged. Piracy equipment including DTH Set Top Boxes (of Sun Direct), Umbrellas, Amplifier, Modulator, Star Boxes etc. were seized.  RST Digital’s owner Vijay Shetty is in remand since 25th May 2016 and his bail application has been rejected.

    Andhra Pradesh

    Initial investigations

    Star India’s investigations at Rayadurg town in Ananthapur District, AP (on the border of Bellary district, Karnataka) revealed that local cable operator Ganesh Communication, which has a subscriber base of over 10,000 households, was indulging in piracy through DTH. The operator was transmitting illegal signals carrying a total of 15 channels including Star India channels Star Plus, Suvarna and MAA TV along with Sony, Zee and Gemini. 

    Action taken

    Post the initial investigations, Star India officials filed a First Information Report (FIR) against Ganesh Communication at the Rayadurg police station, under section 420 IPC and 63, 69 of the Copyright Act, which resulted in a raid at the premises of the operator. Piracy equipment including DTH Set Top Boxes (of Sun Direct & Videocon), Umbrellas, Amplifier, Modulator etc. were seized. During the raid, the operator resisted the entry of the Police in the control room and arguments were exchanged. The SHO (Mahanandi) then reported the matter to the Deputy Superintendent of Police and entered the control room forcefully, seized the equipment and arrested a Technician. The new owners of the network are well connected and have direct connection through MSO associations as well as ministers in AP government  

    Before Star India’s action, Sun Network’s Anti-Piracy team tried to conduct a raid on Ganesh Communication but failed. 

    Madhya Pradesh

    Initial investigations

    Star India discovered that Tanishq Communications (located at Itarsi town in Hoshangabad District, Madhya Pradesh) was indulging in the illegal transmission of channels such as Star Sports 3, Star Plus and Life Ok, through Area transgression by SV Enterprises, Hoshangabad. Tanishq Communications has a strong subscriber base of over 15,000 households in the state.  The proprietor of Tanishq Communication, Mahesh Chouksey is highly influential in the area and also well-connected with the ruling Political party.  

    Action taken

    Star India officials have been pursuing the matter with local police since August 2015 on 25 May 2016 filed a First Information Report (FIR) against Tanishq Communication under section Sec 63 & 65 of Copy right Act, 1957. The officials also met with the Superintendent of Police (SP), Inspector General of Police (IGP) & Director General of Police (DGP), which resulted in a raid at the premises of the operator. Piracy equipment including one Node, one Transmitter, one Channel Mixer were seized, and a Technician was arrested.

  • 30 large sites average earnings/year in 2013 was $4.4 million from advertising-financed piracy in US

    30 large sites average earnings/year in 2013 was $4.4 million from advertising-financed piracy in US

    NEW DELHl: Advertising-financed piracy was an extremely profitable business as an economic study of the US market alone showed estimated pirate website ad revenue at $227 million annually.

    In a presentation on ‘Online Advertising, Brand Integrity and Content Creation: Problems and Solutions’, Cable and Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia (CASBAA) Chief Policy Officer John Medeiros said the 30 largest sites had earned an average of $4.4 million per year in 2013 and even small sites could easily have earned $100,000. Barriers to entry awere low and attracting a user base required little effort or investment.

    Speaking at a FICCI conference on ‘Digital Advertising: Protecting Brand Integrity & Stimulating Content Creation’, he said Invalid Traffic (IVT) hosts were using online systems to generate non-human traffic (NHT) to illegitimately increase profit and high rates of IVT were seen 50 times more frequently among illegitimate sites than legitimate ones. He added that the growing problem of online ad misplacement was not only resulting in financially encouraging various illegal activities but was also causing serious damage to the integrity of major brands when they appeared on illegal sites.

    Meanwhile, the session was informed that the British Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)’s Operation Creative law enforcement programme was coming down hard on online pirates to combat the menace of digital piracy.

    City of London police detective chief superintendent David Clark said PIPCU’s aim was to investigate, disrupt and serious and organized intellectual property crime which causes significant harm or damage to the UK economy or the general public.

    Clark said the strategic objectives of the UK police were to address IP crime through prosecution and disruption; use a problem-solving approach to address the international threat; maintain an intelligence-led capability; support enforcement activity with effective media coverage; develop a PREVENT strategy with the IPO and other organizations; and reduce IP crime through a partnership approach with stakeholders.

    He added that there was an urgent need for behavioral change as well in consumers who should realize that buying illegal products was a crime.

    A Digital Trading Standards Group (DTSG) had been established to ensure that digital display advertising was not supporting inappropriate or illegal content/services in the United Kingdom, he added.

    UK Good Practice Principles had also been drafted which integrated the industry-police approach. Highlighting the achievements of the UK police, Clark said 8,500 counterfeit websites have been suspended since PIPCU’s inception in 2013.

    21 Century Fox senior vice president for government relations Joe Welch said FICCI’s advocacy on IPR policy had led to many significant and effective changes in the policies related to IP. He added that a sound policy dialogue to appropriately tackle the menace of piracy and a conducive environment to invigorate investment climate for the creative industry in India will definitely benefit and project India globally as a preferred destination for investments by the creative industries of the world.

    After the inaugural session, discussions on the critical issue of misplaced ads resulting in funding of illegal activities were held and potential solutions that could be adopted by India to curtail this practice were explored to help digital advertising and the creative industries co-exist and flourish in today’s innovative and investment-led economy.

     

  • 30 large sites average earnings/year in 2013 was $4.4 million from advertising-financed piracy in US

    30 large sites average earnings/year in 2013 was $4.4 million from advertising-financed piracy in US

    NEW DELHl: Advertising-financed piracy was an extremely profitable business as an economic study of the US market alone showed estimated pirate website ad revenue at $227 million annually.

    In a presentation on ‘Online Advertising, Brand Integrity and Content Creation: Problems and Solutions’, Cable and Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia (CASBAA) Chief Policy Officer John Medeiros said the 30 largest sites had earned an average of $4.4 million per year in 2013 and even small sites could easily have earned $100,000. Barriers to entry awere low and attracting a user base required little effort or investment.

    Speaking at a FICCI conference on ‘Digital Advertising: Protecting Brand Integrity & Stimulating Content Creation’, he said Invalid Traffic (IVT) hosts were using online systems to generate non-human traffic (NHT) to illegitimately increase profit and high rates of IVT were seen 50 times more frequently among illegitimate sites than legitimate ones. He added that the growing problem of online ad misplacement was not only resulting in financially encouraging various illegal activities but was also causing serious damage to the integrity of major brands when they appeared on illegal sites.

    Meanwhile, the session was informed that the British Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)’s Operation Creative law enforcement programme was coming down hard on online pirates to combat the menace of digital piracy.

    City of London police detective chief superintendent David Clark said PIPCU’s aim was to investigate, disrupt and serious and organized intellectual property crime which causes significant harm or damage to the UK economy or the general public.

    Clark said the strategic objectives of the UK police were to address IP crime through prosecution and disruption; use a problem-solving approach to address the international threat; maintain an intelligence-led capability; support enforcement activity with effective media coverage; develop a PREVENT strategy with the IPO and other organizations; and reduce IP crime through a partnership approach with stakeholders.

    He added that there was an urgent need for behavioral change as well in consumers who should realize that buying illegal products was a crime.

    A Digital Trading Standards Group (DTSG) had been established to ensure that digital display advertising was not supporting inappropriate or illegal content/services in the United Kingdom, he added.

    UK Good Practice Principles had also been drafted which integrated the industry-police approach. Highlighting the achievements of the UK police, Clark said 8,500 counterfeit websites have been suspended since PIPCU’s inception in 2013.

    21 Century Fox senior vice president for government relations Joe Welch said FICCI’s advocacy on IPR policy had led to many significant and effective changes in the policies related to IP. He added that a sound policy dialogue to appropriately tackle the menace of piracy and a conducive environment to invigorate investment climate for the creative industry in India will definitely benefit and project India globally as a preferred destination for investments by the creative industries of the world.

    After the inaugural session, discussions on the critical issue of misplaced ads resulting in funding of illegal activities were held and potential solutions that could be adopted by India to curtail this practice were explored to help digital advertising and the creative industries co-exist and flourish in today’s innovative and investment-led economy.

     

  • Zeel tastes success in satellite TV signals’ theft & piracy; mastermind arrested

    Zeel tastes success in satellite TV signals’ theft & piracy; mastermind arrested

    MUMBAI: In a major relief for Zee Entertainment Enterprises (Zeel), Delhi Police acting on FIR No. 243/2014 after carrying out a detailed initial investigations raided premises in Kalyanpur area of Lucknow on 22 May, 2015 and found illegal tapping and unauthorised uploading of live-content of all popular Indian television channels like Zee TV, Star Plus, Colors and Sony TV amongst other on pirated websites.

     

    During the raid, more than two dozen workers were caught red-handed, digitally stealing live feed of Indian pay TV channels using more than 50 DTH and cable TV set-top boxes. These persons were extracting TV feeds, removing watermarks and uploading them on their sites such as www.Desitvforum.net. The websites are being accessed by millions of viewers abroad in USA, Canada, Europe, UK and Netherlands. Thousands of dollars are being illegally earned by the pirates, which in turn is causing a huge amount of loss to broadcasters. In addition, there has also been rampant violation of foreign exchange regulations and money laundering.

     

    The Delhi Police arrested the mastermind of this piracy racket, Md. Asif Siddiqui. Various equipment including computers and other accessories, used in carrying out the piracy and signal theft were also seized.

     

    Investigations in the matter are continuing and more such raids and arrests are likely to follow based on the interrogation of the accused.

     

    Zeel had lodged an FIR no 243/2014 u/s IPC 379/420/465/107/109/120B, u/s 63 Copyright Act 1957 and u/s 66/66C of IT Act 2000 with Delhi Police in Chanakyapuri Police Station for unauthorised streaming of the episodes of various Zee channel programs within 10 to 12 minutes of their actual broadcast. The modus operandi was that in addition to tapping and stealing live feed of various channels from DTH and cable set top boxes, the accused persons within these 10-12 minutes, were recording video, editing identifiable information, adding their logo and uploading it to several servers simultaneously.

     

    This is the first occasion when an internet-pirate has been caught red-handed in India. Normally identifying individual persons and their physical locations behind their pirated sites is very difficult. It took more than a yearlong investigation and digital evidence gathering by Zee’s in-house IT security team to collect irrefutable evidence to identify humans behind the mask of these websites, which were hosted from Sweden.

     

    With the proliferation of Internet enabled devices, the Indian broadcasting industry has been bleeding badly. According to an open-source web-based analytics, this particular group had more than 10 lakh daily viewers and has been earning thousands of dollars every day. The targeted customers were mainly from US, Canada, Europe etc.

     

    With the rapid advent of technology enabling the dissemination of content across digital platforms and web, there are enormous revenue opportunities for broadcasters and other content owners. The Indian channels, which are available in more than 100 countries around the world, are extremely popular amongst the South-Asian diaspora. However, piracy, stealing of signals and their unauthorised transmission and streaming on web has been a major stumbling block in revenue monetization. In fact, broadcasters are losing huge revenue to these pirates.

     

    Unfortunately the provisions of existing laws such as Copyright Act, IT Act 2000 have not proved to be effective in curbing these kinds of new-age crimes as piracy is categorised as a “bailable” offence. In order to effectively deal with the menace of copyright piracy the copyright infringement should be made “non-bailable.”

     

    Similarly, whether signal theft could be regarded as theft of “property” as contemplated under section 379 of IPC also needs to be clarified. The need of the hour is to review these laws and introduce more stringent provisions to deal with such offences so that these provisions may act as an effective deterrent.

  • Shemaroo obtains John Doe order from HC to protect ‘Hunterrr’ from piracy

    Shemaroo obtains John Doe order from HC to protect ‘Hunterrr’ from piracy

    MUMBAI: Shemaroo Entertainment has obtained a John Doe order from the Mumbai High Court to protect its latest release Hunterrr from the menace of piracy. The order, not only restricts piracy on cable, digital and physical medium but action can also be taken against a person watching the film from an illegal source.

     

    Shemaroo Entertainment has sent a copy of the order to various MSOs, LCOs and ISPs. Further, the court has directed all police authorities to act on the order.

     

    The order restrains any person from “downloading from internet, telecasting, broadcasting and distributing or putting on the cable TV network, disseminating, reproducing or otherwise making available to the public, the film Hunterrr or “from (i) making a copy of the said film, (ii) to sell or give on hire, or offer for sale or hire, any copy of the said film (iii) to communicate the film to the public in any manner whatsoever including by way of but not limited to telecasting and/or re telecasting the said film, or even otherwise dealing with the rights in the said film which vest exclusively in the Plaintiff, in any manner whatsoever.” The order also restrains others “from communicating or making available or distributing, or duplicating, or displaying, or releasing, or showing, or uploading, or downloading or exhibiting, or playing, and/or defraying the movie Hunterrr in any manner from the Plaintiff or in any other manner, which would violate/infringe the Plaintiff’s copyright in the said film Hunterrr.”

     

    Hunterrr stars Gulshan Devaiah, Radhika Apte and Sai Tamhankar and is produced by Anurag Kashyap’s Phantom Films.

     

    A John Doe order is defined as an action instituted by a party who seeks the aid of the Court in fear of some future probable injury to his rights or interest and the action is brought to prevent a wrong that is apprehended.

     

  • TDSAT directs Taj TV to give signals to Fastway Transmission in Karnal

    TDSAT directs Taj TV to give signals to Fastway Transmission in Karnal

    NEW DELHI: The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) has directed Taj Television – the distribution arm of Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (ZEEL) – to provide its signals to multi-system operator (MSO) Fastway Transmission in Karnal in Haryana as an interim measure.

     

    The Tribunal has said that the final order will be passed post the resolution of a pending dispute where another New Delhi based MSO – Indiverse Broadband has claimed that both Siti Cable and Fastway are indulging in piracy and taking away its subscribers.

     

    It said the interim order was being given “having regard to the fact that due to non-supply of the signals, Fastway may be losing the market on a daily basis.”

     

    Even as it appointed Mansoor Ali Shoket as the advocate-commissioner to record the submissions of all the parties, the Tribunal said that Fastway will pay a monthly sum of Rs 17 lakh to the Tribunal and the first month’s fee will have to be deposited in the Tribunal by 3 February.  

     

    TDSAT chairman Aftab Alam and member Kuldip Singh said, “The supply of signals by virtue of this direction shall not create any equity in favour of Fastway. It is further directed that while enlisting any LCOs or subscribers, Fastway should bear in mind that in case its petitions are finally dismissed, the supply of signals by Taj Television may come to a sudden end without any notice. It is further made clear that as a result of disconnection of the supply of signals, Fastway alone will be responsible for any monetary claims raised by any LCO or subscriber or any civil or criminal liability.”

     

    The order further said, “Even while the Tribunal proceeds to consider the rival cases of the parties on their merits, it is made clear that the pendency of the petitions before the Tribunal shall not, in any manner, come in the way of any other authority or court having jurisdiction to proceed in the matter.”

     

    The Tribunal said the cases will be listed on 2 February for framing of issues. On that day, the counsel for all the parties shall jointly submit an agreed list of issues. In case there are issues on which there is no agreement between the parties, the decision will be taken by the Tribunal. All the three sides shall file their respective evidence affidavits by 10 February.

     

    Fastway shall then produce its witnesses for cross-examination before Shoket – appointed by mutual consent – on 12 February. After cross-examination of Fastway’s witnesses, cross-examination of the Indiverse witnesses will take place following which the cross-examination of Taj Television witnesses will take place. The Advocate-Commissioner and all sides shall ensure that cross-examination of all the witnesses is over by 5 March.

     

    Shoket will be paid honorarium at the rate of Rs 7,500 per day. The payment for the days on which the cross-examination of any party takes place, will be made by that party. The three cases will be listed for hearing on 19 March.

     

    The Tribunal noted that in these cases, “We are faced with the issue of piracy of TV channels, that is to say, in case it is established that an MSO is engaged in unauthorised transmission of channels on a large scale and in an organised manner over a long period of time, what would be its liability and what would be the remedies available to the broadcaster whose channels are re-transmitted without legal sanction.” 

     

    Even though clause 3.2 of the Interconnect Regulations 2004 expressly mentions “default in payment” as the ground for denial of signals, “the question that needs to be examined is whether an MSO indulging in organized large scale piracy over a long period of time would still be entitled to claim the supply of signals as of rights in terms of the Regulations. The ancillary question is what remedies are available to the broadcaster and the other MSOs suffering losses on account of the piracy,” the Tribunal noted.

     

    Fastway Transmissions had come to the Tribunal seeking a direction to Taj Television, to give its channels for re-transmission in Karnal. Earlier, Indiverse had filed its petition seeking a direction to Taj Television to agree to a substantial reduction in its subscriber base on the plea that the unauthorised entry of Fastway and another MSO, Siti Cable in Karnal, has greatly eroded its subscriber base.

     

    Taj Television resisted the demands of its channels by Fastway primarily on the allegation that the latter is engaged in rampant piracy of its signals in the area of Karnal. Indiverse also makes the same allegation and states that even though it held dominant position as an MSO in Karnal, as a result of unauthorised entry of Fastway and Siti Cable, another MSO there, and the rampant piracy by them, it is reduced to a state where 90 – 95 per cent of its network is taken over by the two MSOs.

  • MPDA launches platform for downloading legitimate content online

    MPDA launches platform for downloading legitimate content online

    MUMBAI: With digital universe being the destination of the future, MPDA in association with Film & Television Producers Guild of India (FTPGI) has launched an initiative to thwart online pirates and encourage content owners to spot a legitimate platform to download content.

     

    The duo has announced a new website ‘www.findanymovie.in’ that will direct the consumer to a legitimate site when they want to watch content online. 

    The Indian market is at a tipping point for online businesses to provide a multitude of options to consumers. During 2012-2013, the online video audience grew by an astounding 27 per cent dominated by Bollywood. Content owners and distributors are constantly looking for new options and technologies that caters to the growing demand of a young population (75 per cent under the age of 35).

    The idea, with this platform is to build partners along the way. First, there is need to fill the missing gap of a website that leads consumers to legitimate sites. The idea is to educate and inform the consumer first and then partner with more and more content providers.

  • PHD Chamber to join hands with I&B Ministry to launch campaign about piracy

    PHD Chamber to join hands with I&B Ministry to launch campaign about piracy

    NEW DELHI: Information and Broadcasting Minister Prakash Javadekar today welcomed the initiative taken by the PHD Chamber of Commerce and Industry to launch a joint campaign to create awareness about video and software piracy.

     

    The Minister was responding to an offer by the Chamber whose Media and Entertainment Committee members met today.

     

    While they thanked the Minister for removing service tax from television advertising, they said the music and film industry was facing a major problem because of illegal piracy.

     

    The delegation offered its services for an awareness campaign in this regard among general public through conferences, awareness campaigns and painting competitions among school children.

     

    The delegation was led by Chamber president Sharad Jaipuria with vice presidents Alok Sri Ram  and Media and Entertainment Committee chairman Mukesh Gupta, ED Saurabh Sanyal and senior secretary Yogesh Srivastava.

  • Piracy & l’affaire JadooTV

    Piracy & l’affaire JadooTV

    MUMBAI: The empire is striking back. In the US,  broadcasters won a battle to disallow transmission of their free to air signals to Aereo subscribers  when the US  Supreme Court declared the Chaitanya Khanojia- founded company’s offering  illegal last week.

     

    Cyber crime cell officials  swooped in on the offices of  over the top (OTT ) or internet protocol TV  services provider Jadoo TV in the Thurmalgery area in the south Indian city of Secunderabad and arrested four of its executives on 29 June 2014.

     

    The alleged crime: the company was illegally tapping into cable TV signals of Indian broadcasters and streaming them to customers over the internet in several countries having south Asian diaspora.

     

    The cybercrime cell took the step following a complaint from Maa Television.  Hyderabad police commissioner M Mahender Reddy while tom-tomming the arrests told journalists that  customers only needed to “buy the Jadoo TV set-top box without having to pay any monthly subscription. Most of the channels are paid channels and the gang was streaming their channels through internet. TV channels running their business legitimately, were incurring huge losses to the tune of several hundreds of crores,”

     

    He additionally said that “this signal piracy was going on for the past six seven years on different names from different cities and the accused managed to escape from the clutches of police by changing their set up to different cities. The ‘Pearl Technology’ was streaming 115 TV channels to Jadoo TV. Two bank accounts of its India CEO Sumith Ahuja have been identified and police are in the process of seizing them.”

     

    However, indiantelevision.com is aware that JadooTV has been in existence for around a decade but started the rollout of its box only in 2008.  Jadoo TV was promoted by Pakistan-origin US national Sajid Sohail (who developed the Jadoo receiving box and gets it manufactured out of China these days), while the Dubai-based Pearl Media Group was promoted by CEO Faisal Aftab and it worked as its content partner.

     

    CEO Sohail had said in an interview to Rawal TV earlier this year that the company has signed legitimate contracts with content providers in various countries- including Pakistan, India and Afghanistan – to stream their channels either from the satellite-delivered beam or from the streams they deliver on the internet. He had said that broadcasters were eagerly contacting him to legally carry their channels on JadooTV because of its popularity worldwide.

     

    He added in that interview: “We have a service call MyJadoo, which allows viewers to add broadcast streams on the internet to their Jadoo service just like YouTube does. But if we get a complaint or notice from the content owner, we pull it off just like YouTube does online. The owner has to write to us under the Digitial Millenium Copyright Act about the objectionable content and we delete it.” (His interview can be seen here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBgm4mCW57M#t=364) .

     

    It was as recently as in March 2014 that JadooTV was acquired by a Silicon Valley-based, privately-funded and Intel Capital-backed company CloudStram Technologies, along with Pearl Media Group and Altair Techonologies to create what has been hailed as a “vertically integrated OTT power house.”

     

    Cloudstream had in its press release stated that “the acquisition catapults it to be the dominant multicultural OTT provider, gaining access to a well-known OTT brand JadooTV, the largest south Asian user base in excess of one million viewers, key content deals, and proprietary technologies.”

     

    The JadooTV website openly states that it is offering channels such as News Express, Zoom, Mtunes, Mastii, Aaj Tak, 9XM, Music Xpress, FoodFood, Dhamaal, Big Magic, among many others from India to subscribers. Nowhere are the mainline GECs such as ZeeTV, Sony Entertainment, Colors or  Star or the SunTVs mentioned as being available to viewers, though it says many more channels are available apart from those listed. And a perusal of all its Facebook pages catering to subscribers in various  countries has no mention of mainline channels being delivered either through conversations or comments or promotions on those pages.

     

    The Pearl Media Group describes itself as a “venture capital funded content aggregation and dissemination media company, offering content owners and consumers multi-platform solutions and service offerings. Pearl is headquartered in Dubai, United Arab Emirates with development, research and design, and operations facilities located in Hong Kong, India, Japan, Pakistan, and the United States. Our mission is to connect niche content owners and consumers worldwide, whenever, wherever!”

     

    Its website pearlmediagroup.com has a listing of partners which can be accessed at (http://www.pearlmediagroup.com/partners.html) and it is these very channels and services which are mentioned on almost all the JadooTV or Jadoo Plus  product offerings in promotions in various countries.

     

    However, a distribution professional with the conditionality of not going on record told indiantelevision.com that JadooTV had indeed signed legitimate contracts but with only a few niche and news channels in India. “But the mainline channels get  shown illegally in some countries,” he stated. “And you don’t need promotions  or ads to promote these channels, it’s the buzz that was passing this information among the south Asian diaspora in the various countries.”

     

    A scan of US-based customer reviews on Amazon.com however hints that JadooTV may not be resorting to piracy – at least in the USA. Some JadooTV box buyers have complained that popular Hindi channels are not available on JadooTV. One reviewer has clearly stated that “there are just 25 Indian, 42 Pakistani and six Punjabi channels” as recently as last year. Another one Kishan Patel writes on 14 June 2014: “I really loved it. Most of all main Indian news channels. Awesome. Works great with Ethernet cable. Don’t use wifi. Wifi sucks.”

     

    A user named Rubaiyat Islam “Rubaiyat008” from Denton Texas, clearly writes on page 12 of the Amazon reviews page: “For those of you looking to buy Jadoo for Indian channels, let me tell you this; there is NO Sony Entertainment, Zee TV, or any of the mainstream Indian channels. Apparently, only Dish Network has the exclusive rights to these mainstream channels in U.S.”

     

    Clearly, there is something amiss here. Consumers openly dislcosing that JadooTV has no mainline Indian channels. Then what is it pirating is the question?

     

    L’affaire JadooTV clearly needs deeper investigation. May justice be served!

  • Our aim is to roll up all the taxes under one GST: Uday Singh

    Our aim is to roll up all the taxes under one GST: Uday Singh

    The word piracy sends shivers down the spines of all content owners, but there is one man who has made it his mission to eradicate piracy from the media and entertainment space. That man is none other than Motion Picture Distribution Association (India) managing director Uday Singh.

     

    With over 28 years of sales, marketing and general management experience in scaling up operations and building business from start up for MNCs in India and attaining a leadership position in the market and business with significant turnaround and change management; Singh has done it all.

     

    He has key experience in media entertainment, consumer electronics, domestic appliances and multimedia industries. He has had stints at Philips, Sony Pictures Entertainment (India) and PVR Pictures earlier.

     

    Being a creative and result driven executive with expertise in setting up new markets developing and delivering strong results; Singh has been ensuring in getting the various industry stakeholders together to fight against piracy.

     

    Speaking to indiantelevision.com’s Sidharth Iyer, Singh dwells on various perennial issues like piracy, high taxation, specific copyright laws and the difficulties that MPDA faces in propagating anti-piracy in the country.     

     

    It’s been five years since MPDA India has been present in the industry, how has the journey been? Highlight your roles and responsibilities.

     

    There are three aspects: first there is the legislative side where we look into getting a specific legal framework into place which can protect copyright. Next we take care of the enforcement, which is basically keeping a check on people who steal content and monetise from the same by redistributing it across the globe and finally the outreach, how do we best reach out to our first line of defense – which is the cinema staff and theatre owners – educating them on piracy and how it works, so that they can recognise it and nip it at the bud.

     

    On the legislative side we have carried out a lot of initiatives. 90 per cent of all pirated copies are camcorded in cinema halls, and an Ernst & Young 2008 report claims that as much as Rs 16,000 crore is lost every year due to piracy and as many as 577,000 direct jobs are also lost as a result of theft and piracy, afflicting India’s entertainment industry.

    We have been working with local bodies and try and implement the global best practices out here. We have also observed that many jurisdictions like in US, Philippines and other regions in the Asia Pacific as well, specific camcording legislations have made a big difference in getting piracy down and we intend to bring that practice to India as well.

         

    Is there a set guideline for understanding the copyright laws in the country? Have you managed to reduce the taxation on films?

     

    We have been lobbying with the government to have provisions made for the same, and the cinematography bill does carry some provisions because only very specific provisions can make a difference, as our copyright laws tend to be very broad and its only best to have specifics in place to better understand and implement the copyright law in the country.

     

    The other major hurdle for films is the taxation levied on them, and being one of the highest taxed industries it does take a toll on the budget and revenue scale. We have been working with other industries and the government to rationalise those taxes and eliminate some of them if possible and hopefully roll them all into a single goods and services tax (GST).

     

    However there is a service tax on the input side, so some of the studios that are producing the movie domestically have to face it by increasing its production costs. Currently there are three levels of taxes; the service tax, the entertainment tax and the local body tax. Thus, our recommendation and appeal to the government and the authorities is to roll it all into one single GST to avoid any duplication.

     

    What are the challenges faced by MPDA and how do you overcome the same?

     

    There have been issues in the television side of things, where we have been talking to the government and making our submissions on issues such as, liberating the pricing, the must provide and must carry provisions, among others.

     

    It was also heartening to see that the foreign direct investment (FDI) in the television and broadcast sector also witnessed a hike. So, we look at very generic issues and how the government can better regulate the media and entertainment sector, primarily focused on where our studios feel where we should get involved on the legislative side.

     

    We also have the Los Angles Film Council, where we have been lobbying for the ease of shooting and working with the government for getting to a single window clearance, there are 70 clearances otherwise required before even shooting a single frame.

     

    Our efforts and initiatives will be again presented in an E&Y report, which talks about how to simplify, incentivize and further how to promote film tourism. The plan is to promote film tourism in a big way and we have some great examples of how it has been done in other places like Canada and Thailand. Keeping in mind that we have some great technicians and production crews here, India can become an important destination for films as well in the near future.

     

    On the enforcement side, we are no longer chasing the guys on the streets as it has all moved online and it’s now gotten into camcording. We have managed to eliminate quite a few significant release groups, who have been copying and redistributing a lot of the films. 

     

    MPDA has played a big role in ensuring that piracy is looked at as a serious offence, how do you intend to put an end to this evil?

     

    Our intention is not to catch a kid who’s taking a trophy shot in front of the screen, but the people who actually steal the content and make a living out of it. After 2012, there have been almost 67 incidents where we have apprehended pirates who used to capture the video and slap on a different audio and export it to other neighbouring countries.

     

    We also work with cinema staff and have educated nearly 1,400 of them on what are the best practices to propagate anti-piracy, by putting up signs in the surroundings of the theatre. They have also been educated on how best to deal with incidents of camcording. We have also tried to sensitise various law enforcement authorities on the various issues and problems due to piracy and how they can help in preventing such occurrences.

     

    I believe, unlike ever before, we have been able to work hand-in-hand with the local film industry and really come together as stakeholders of the industry and really put an end to this evil.

     

    In the recent past you have associated with the Anti-Video Piracy Cell of Andhra Pradesh, and also carried out various initiatives on the ground, your thoughts on the same…

     

    The Anti-Video Piracy Cell (AVPC) of Andhra Pradesh has been one of our brightest spots in the fight against piracy. It’s been a very proactive cell and very aware of the changing trends in the space of piracy. They have an in-house team for the mapping of sights, and we found a great ally in them for our fight against piracy.

     

    With AVPC, we only thought that the need is to contemporize the way we catch hold of the pirates and with the ‘Indian Movie Cop’ and other such applications we have tried to keep a check on digital piracy.

     

    The app really helps in educating everyone on piracy and the laws of the land, and to keep it interactive we also put up trailers of upcoming releases just to give the user that extra bit to help serve a larger cause among other reward schemes.

     

    It is a known fact that there have been leakages on the cable TV front, how do you plan to overcome the issue?

     

    Digitisation has really helped on this front and it has certainly not been an easy process, but a large step by the government to clearly make this decisive move to get to know who the subscribers are and get to know where they are.

     

    Over a period of time, the broadcast industry has taken interest to resolve the problems relating to cable leakages. It used to be very robust in the analogue world, and still continues to happen, but like the film industry, the broadcast industry too needs to come together to address this perennial issue.

     

    With a lot of Hollywood studios currently operating in the country, does it help in better promotion of their interests among local production houses?

     

    Largely, these are decisions taken by the individual studios and it’s for them to be able to decide with whom they want to tie-up. There have been instances in the past three to four years where a lot of studios have taken an active part in the local productions.

     

    But, again it’s their own strategy on how they best want to enter the market. And once we address larger issues like taxation, ease of operation or piracy, we would be able to provide a substantially better climate for them to come in here.

     

    Is the regulation in India strong enough to support your initiatives? If not, what is lacking?

     

    There is a combination of issues; the laws are very generic in nature – while they may have served their purpose – increasingly we have seen that when there are specific laws for specific issues there are better results.

     

    When we talk about the copyright amendment, we are talking about the technological protection measures. There is an access control and a copy control and barring of hacker tools. In our current legislature, we are talking about copy protection and not about the access; so with the evolving technology, it took almost 10 years to pass that bill.

     

    So legislation is always going to be a long time consuming process and what we have to do is ensure in bringing to the government’s notice how other jurisdictions have handled these issues and what have been some of the best practices.

     

    The second aspect of it is enforcement; in terms of the police force they are certainly overburdened and we all recongnise that, with copyright figuring in the lower priority offences. But wherever we have gone and educated them about the issues relating to piracy, they have responded well.

     

    There are cases where we find the judiciary more proactive in a particular area like Delhi, but in recent history we have had judgments from Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata as well.  So almost all the high courts are getting up to speed on all the copyright issues.

     

    And with the piracy now moving online, there is a need for a lot of hand holding to make content distributers and owners aware of how rapidly the landscape is changing. And we can’t ignore the fact that a lot of these offenders are linked to other organised crimes too, thus becoming difficult to track them down.

     

    Can there be a stop to piracy globally? What preventive measures can be taken?

     

    There can’t be a total bullet proof plan for this; it’s very similar to other crimes. But, what we can clearly do is to create a favourable environment where if not eradicate then at least we can apprehend the criminals.

     

    Eventually you will find that there are only a few people who are causing most of the damage and they are part of much more organised syndicates. There also needs to be an updation of the loss due to piracy report as there has been a huge increase in the number of internet connections since 2008.

     

    The need of the hour is to also educate the film industry on how things work, with most films being made available online just hours after its release. There have been attempts made to resolve this issue, but to no avail.

     

    There are two ways by which this has been kept under check internationally, one to have an administrative relief and the other a judicial relief. We have noticed that these work in blocking content from getting leaked outside the authorised personals’ hands.    

     

    Recently there has been a rampant emergence of rogue sites like Torrentz, what is MPDA’s take on them? Also, your thoughts on user generated content sites like YouTube.

     

    These rogue sites are primarily designed to steal content and monetise by making it available online. Mostly they make money through advertising and in certain cases even through subscriptions. It’s surprising to find that a lot of advertisers who are associating their brands with these rogue sites are only creating a bad impression of themselves on people who then associate them with supporting piracy. They may be having subscriptions, because they may have a camcorded print and they put it up very quickly and start building a premium subscription revenue model.

     

    To counter these sites, what we have done is listed out the legitimate and licensed sites from where movies can either be streamed or downloaded with a cost attached to give the people the option of viewing legitimate content and also getting the content owner his rightful due.

     

    Coming to the user generated content sites commonly known as UGCs have brought in a lot of mechanisms to deal with piracy among other issues, but still it’s not been enough. Lot of them have their filters and they have been trying to work with the industry on how best it can work. But in many cases we find that without the permission of the user, any site that puts up that content is something that we are not comfortable about.

     

    Eventually what I believe is, with more and more filters coming in and more and more legitimate sites coming up the whole content distribution and exhibition will undergo an evolution.

     

    In the past, physical copies of pirated VCDs and DVDs were available on streets. You don’t find many of these pirates nowadays, what has MPDA done to eradicate this problem?

     

    Actually in the past few years, we have not really focused much on that front. In the 1990s we were really going after each and every pirate on sight and almost 5,000 to 6,000 cases were being registered, but without a single conviction.

     

    We realised that the source was through camcording and three major areas where it was taking place was Ahmedabad, Indore and Ghaziabad. As we started making inroads and worked with the police and the theatre owners to eradicate these rogues from the streets, they went deeper into the heartlands.  

     

    The DVD is practically dead… so what is the way forward for moviemakers to monetise their content?

     

    The consumption of movies has not gone down, but the way the movie is being consumed has evolved. And technology is allowing us to give legitimate content. For example with Apple TV the user can simply just click on the movie that he wants to watch and buy it or rent it.

     

    So the consumer is looking at all kind of content, for the big screen, mobile screen, content on the go, and something wherever he can watch. Thus, to cater to the user’s interests we too are changing our business models to accommodate the demands and supplement those demands with supplies.

      

    In India the video market never really took off like in other parts of the globe. The time when we were looking at buying VCDs, DVDs came into play and now Blu-Rays are in the market, so with constant evolution taking place, the best thing is to move along with the choice of the user and it also helps as we can directly skip to the digital era.

     

    What is MPDA’s plan for the year 2014?

     

    In FICCI Frames 2014 we launched a report with Deloitte on the economic contribution of the motion pictures business in India. We have seen that the media and entertainment sector contributed substantially, almost Rs 50,000 crore in 2013 and generates almost 1.8 million jobs.

     

    It is very important that when we talk to the government they realise the potential of this sector and given the right inputs, it has the potential of proving more employment and also contribute handsomely to the GDP growth of the country.

     

    Currently, it’s at a growth rate of 12 per cent, which is almost two and a half times our GDP growth and it can grow at a faster rate if given the proper impetus.

     

    During the year we will continue to simplify the process for films by getting in the single window clearance. So our next step will be to closely look at it and incentivising and finally promoting the initiative. And we would help the industry flourish and get to its optimum potential.