Tag: NDTV

  • NDTV resolutions confirm re-appointment of Roys & sale of subsidiaries

    MUMBAI: NDTV, in a communique to the secretary, BSE Limited, and assistant VP, Listing Department, National Stock Exchange of India, signed by the company secretary Navneet Raghuvanshi, confirmed that four special resolutions as mentioned in the Postal Ballot Notice dated 11 May, 2017, have been passed by the members through postal ballot (including e-voling) with the requisite majority.

    The resolutions were: Re-appointment of Prannoy Roy as the executive co-chairperson of the company and payment of remuneration, re-appointment of Radhika Roy as the executive co-chairperson of the company and payment of remuneration, sale of entire equity stake by NDTV Lifestyle Holdings Limited, NDTV Convergence Limited and NDTV Worldwide Limited, each a material subsidiary of the Company, in NDTV Ethnic Retail Limited, another material subsidiary of the company, to Nameh Hotels & Resorts Private Limited and sale of 2% equity stake by NDTV Networks Limited, a material subsidiary of t he company, in NDTV Lifestyle Holdings Limited (Lifestyle Holdings), another material subsidiary of the Company, to Nameh Hotels & Resorts Private Limited and thereby ceasing the control over Lifestyle Holdings and NDTV Lifestyle Limited, another material subsidiary of the company.

    Practicing company secretaries Hemant Kumar Singh and Prashant Kumar Balodia were appointed as the scrutinizer(s) by the company to conduct the postal ballot (including e-voting) process in fair and transparent manner. They submitted their report on 23 June, 2017.

  • Proposed stake sale: Provision for IT dept to file civil suit, says NDTV

    MUMBAI: NDTV, in reply to an email from the NSE and the BSE, says there is no power vested with the Income Tax Department to issue advisories/letters under Section 281 or 281B of the Income Tax Act. If the Income Tax Department is of the view that provisions of Section 281 have been violated, then the recourse is to file a Civil Suit with the Civil Court and not to issue advisory or letters.

    Accordingly, the letter dated 16.6.2017 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 18(1), New Delhi has no relevance or applicability in the proposed transaction.

    NDTV refers to a letter dated 16.6.2017 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 18(1), New Delhi, to New Delhi Television Ltd. in respect of the proposed sale of equity interest by certain subsidiaries of M/s NDTV Ltd.,a copy of which was also marked to the BSE and NSE.

    The NDTV reply signed by the company secretary Navneet Raghuvanshi, says it is pertinent to point out that an order under Section 281B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“Act”) was passed in the case of NDTV Ltd. (not the subsidiaries of NDTV Ltd. which are separate taxable entities) on 14.9.2015 whereby the following three genre of assets of NDTV Ltd. were provisionally attached by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax.

    A. All rights in respect of all the immoveable properties including land and building as reflected in the Balance Sheet of NDTV Ltd. as on 31.03.2015 declared at Rs. 6.83 crore.
    B. All non-current investments made by NDTV Ltd. as appearing in the Balance Sheet and reflected at Rs. 299.03 crore.
    C. The refund of Rs. 19.88 crore determined after giving appeal effect for the assessment year 2008-09.

    This order was challenged before the Delhi High Court wherein the Court, on 23.09.2015 passed, inter alia, the following Order: “In the meanwhile, there shall be stay of operation of the impugned order dated 14.09.2015 subject to the petitioner’s undertaking that the petitioner will not alienate any asset or create any third party rights without the leave of the court except in the ordinary course of business.”

    The subject matter of the writ petition and the order passed by the Delhi High Court extends to only those assets which were provisionally attached by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 18(1), New Delhi vide its order dated 14.09.2015 and nothing beyond that. Admittedly, the shares being transferred by the subsidiaries of the NDTV Ltd. do not fall in the aforesaid three genre of assets, which were subject matter of attachment by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 18(1), New Delhi vide its order dated 14.09.2015. The assets held by the subsidiaries of NDTV Ltd., in the form of investment in downstream subsidiaries which are subject matter of the present sale are clearly not assets which were either part of provisional attachment order of 14.09.2015 or the High Court’s order of 23.09.2015. Therefore, there is no violation of any order by NDTV Ltd. in the present transaction.

    That apart, the present transaction contemplated by the subsidiaries of NDTV Ltd. is being done at a price which represents the fair value of the shares which has been certified by M/s. Duff & Phelps, a SEBI Registered Category I Merchant Banker Therefore, , there is no loss to the revenue from the said transaction and hence, Section 281 of the Act has no application.

  • Times Now-Republic TV on-air ratings spat continues as each claims top spot in week 23

    BENGALURU: Last week on Thursday, just post 11 am, the newborn Republic TV and the grand old lady of the English news business Times Now, starting flashing BARC data, each claiming the number one spot in viewership. The channels have continued this on-air spat once again. Republic TV says that it has done it once again, if one were to go by the Indian ratings monitor Broadcast Audience Research Council of India (BARC) numbers flashed by it on the channel for week 23 (Saturday, 3 June 2017 to Friday, 10 June 2017).

    Republic TV claims that it has been number one across all segments in week 23. It claims 147 per cent greater viewership than Times Now across all segments across India and 247 per cent greater viewership than Times Now at super primetime.

    In the meantime, Times Now has been flashing on its channel that it is the number one in the English news genre with a relative viewership of 42 per cent while putting Republic TV at second place with a relative viewership of 31 per cent. Times Now puts CNN News 18 9 per cent India Today TV’s relative share at 7 per cent, and NDTV 24×7 at 5 per cent each.

    Republic TV shared viewership details of the other peers in the English News genre: Times Now-28.8 per cent; CNN News 18-12 per cent; India Today News-11 per cent; NDTV-19 per cent; News X-2.5 per cent.

    “The viewership debate is over, we are number 1. It is now one month since we have been in operation and we have now become undisputed leaders in this genre. The game has just begun and we are now absolutely unstoppable. We will take the game to the next level,” declared Republic TV editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami last week, during a live telecom with Republic TV anchor Hariharan aired on his channel, just after 11:15AM.

    It may be recalled that in a coordinated move, English News channels had pulled out of BARC on 18 May, only to return to the BARC fold on from midnight of 26 May. English News channels backed by the News Broadcast Association had stripped their signals of BARC audio watermarks. The NBA had requested BARC not to publish Republic TV’s ratings, alleging that the channel has resorted to rampant multiple LCN placements on cable TV networks across the country.

  • NDTV issues response to govt charges

    MUMBAI: NDTV has issues responses to what it calls six allegations levelled by the government. It says: “After the unjustified raids, condemned by legal experts such as Fali Nariman as “unconstitutional”, the government has now leaked a series of unsubstantiated allegations against NDTV and its promoters. The fact that these leaks, released as an unsigned document, are anonymous, is evidence of the subterfuge involved. NDTV will fight this subterfuge transparently and openly in court.

    Meanwhile, here are six points that expose why the government’s leaked allegations are completely without basis. (It should be noted that the Income Tax Department and the Enforcement Directorate are being used by politicians and that wherever we refer to these institutions, we mean not the officers but politicians who are manipulating these agencies).

    Allegation 1: The government says it is looking into “undisclosed income” of NDTV of 1,100 crore rupees.

    The Facts in Response: There is absolutely no undisclosed income. None at all. NBC, one of America’s largest and oldest TV networks (and a subsidiary of General Electric or GE at that time) invested $150 million in NDTV in 2008. Five years later, India’s income tax authorities bizarrely – without any evidence – said the $150m investment:

    a) was a “sham transaction”

    b) NBC/GE were involved in “round tripping”

    c) NBC/GE acted as a front for “money laundering”

    These are extremely serious accusations of criminal offences which would make NBC/GE CEOs liable to imprisonment. The Indian IT department did not have – and has yet to supply – any evidence to back these wildly dangerous accusations against GE which is a major US investor in India. Now watch this interview in 2008 with NBC’s CEO, Jeff Zucker, which establishes that NBC invested in NDTV. The fact that the Income Tax Department is making wild and baseless allegations is obvious with it seeking multiple adjournments to prevent the Tax Tribunal from determining the merits of the case. Moreover, how could the income be “undisclosed” when every detail of the $150 million from NBCU/GE has been fully shared with the authorities, both in India and in the US? The annual reports of NBC and GE, plus filings with the American Security Exchange Commission (SEC) clearly mention the $150 million investment into NDTV.

    The fact that this was not a sham transaction is even today (9 years later) simple to establish: Just check the records of the IRS and the SEC in the USA and they confirm that these funds came from NBC.

    Finally, the CEO of GE, Jeffrey Immelt, meets the Indian PM regularly. So our Income Tax department is alleging that India’s PM meets a “round-tripper” who acts as a “front” in sham transactions. Shame on the IT Department.

    Allegation 2: NDTV raised the money in “shell” companies which had “no real business and no employees.”

    The Facts in Response: As we have repeatedly stated, NDTV Networks was a HOLDING company – not a shell company. This holding company owned significant assets/subsidiaries:

    a) NDTV’s entertainment channel Imagine
    b) NDTV’s Lifestyle channel Good Times
    c) a media outsourcing joint venture with Genpact called Ngen
    d) the digital and mobile business of NDTV called NDTV Convergence
    e) a range of smaller businesses

    These were all valuable companies, which collectively had hundreds of employees. For reference – take a look at NDTV Convergence, which even today runs and owns all of NDTV’s digital assets including its website, app, mobile sites and social media accounts. How can you call this “no real business” or a “shell” company? The authorities are indulging in defamation. RBI recognizes holding companies as legitimate entities – they are not shell/sham companies.

    NDTV Networks itself had a CEO, CFO and a Compliance Officer appointed by NBCU and other employees – but its real value came from the assets it owned. To draw a comparison, Tata Sons, which is also a holding company, draws its value from the downstream companies it owns. So is Tata Sons a “shell” company?

    Allegation 3: NDTV set up a number of other entities in foreign locations and then wound them up.

    The Facts in Response: These companies were set up keeping in mind NDTV’s intention in the mid-2000s to become a global media company and to list NDTV Networks for an IPO. The structure was based on the advice of leading global financial and legal firms and was in absolute compliance with the relevant laws and regulations. Please note that these somewhat complicated structures were the norm a decade ago, necessary for trans-national tax efficiency, and designed to help with mergers and acquisitions together with fund-raising. Once the entertainment channel (NDTV Imagine) was sold, there was no need to retain these companies.

    Allegation 4: NDTV raised funds through “unidentified entities” in the British Virgin Islands, The Cayman Islands, UK, USA, Switzerland, Netherlands, etc. during the financial years 2007-2009.

    The Facts in Response: This is another lie by the Gang-of-Four-Liars. Every entity from which funds were raised has been identified and documents submitted several years ago to all the government authorities. Many multinationals structure their investments for making investments risk-free through countries which provide tax neutrality. In fact, the Supreme Court has held that getting investments through tax-neutral jurisdictions is a well-known form of structuring investment and has upheld the structure of investments through Cayman Islands, Hong Kong, Mauritius, Netherlands etc. Moreover, NDTV has clearly disclosed, with all the supporting documentation, where the money came from. The government knows this. Even the very process of raising the funds was completely transparent. NDTV appointed one of the largest and most highly-respected global firms, Jefferies LLC., to raise funds for NDTV. Jefferies has its headquarters in New York.

    Jefferies controlled the entire fund-raising process and raised $100m from 8 institutions with offices based in London, New York, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc. Each of these institutions had fully declared and transparent reasons for locating their registered offices in various places – which was of no concern and with no connection to NDTV. It was Jefferies LLC. that dealt directly with these institutions and of course with NDTV. Moreover, NDTV reported every single amount raised to the IT Department, the RBI, Stock Exchanges, and every other relevant government authority in an open and transparent manner. In particular, the trolls have tried to highlight The Cayman Islands as though NDTV has an account there. This too is a blatant lie. NDTV has no office, account or any presence at all in The Cayman Islands. In fact, the organization with its registered office in The Cayman Islands is a respected global investor that has invested in several other Indian companies including other Indian media firms. Will the trolls – led by the ugly lies of Gurumurthy and Subramanian Swamy – want all these companies raided by the CBI?

    Allegation 5: After their $150 million investment, NBC and GE “laundered” unaccounted income of Rs. 1,100 crore sent out of India by NDTV to the USA using paper entities, and NBC and GE then sent the 1,000 crores back to India via “money laundering”.

    The Facts in Response: We have already answered the points of “unaccounted income” and “paper entities”. Let’s turn now to the point of “laundering”. Once again, please understand the seriousness of what the government is alleging so wildly. Because it isn’t NDTV they are accusing of laundering money but one of the leading corporations of the world, GE. Their charge is essentially that GE took “undisclosed money”, laundered it, and then invested it back into NDTV Networks. Is there any evidence at all for this extraordinary charge on a top global company? None at all. Is it true? Of course not, and we have already referred to the extensive evidence that establishes this.

    Any investigator or any member of the press can simply verify this by checking with GE, the IRS or the SEC. Please note the seriousness of the accusation – if true, it would result in one of the biggest corporate scandals in American history. It is not a charge that the Indian authorities should be casually throwing about with no evidence and no basis because it could seriously affect the investment climate for India at a time when the government is declaring its commitment to concepts like Ease of Doing Business. It’s bad enough that the CBI raids have sent shock waves through banking circles and have potentially damaged efforts to restructure banking NPAs. Do the authorities really want to risk global confidence in India – just to try to tame a single media channel that isn’t toeing the line?

    Allegation 6: A violation of Rs. 2,030 crores

    The Facts in Response: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has manipulated basic calculations and used some technicalities and procedural errors – minor ones – to apply a penalty that cannot be justified. So the ED is distorting its own rules for how to fine minor (by its own parameters) delays, for example. NDTV has never been a part of any transaction which is not legitimate or not legal.”

  • NDTV raids not connected with press freedom, says South Asia scribes club

    NEW DELHI: Even as senior mediapersons rallied behind NDTV following raids by the Central Bureau of Investigation and several media bodies held protest meetings, the Foreign Correspondents Club of South Asia pointed out that the Government and CBI have said the raids had nothing to do with freedom of press.

    In a terse statement, the FCC also pointed out that the Press Club of India and other organisations had not invited it to join the protest rallies. However, it said ‘We are for the freedom of the press.”

    Information and broadcasting minister M Venkaiah Naidu had last week denied any political interference in the CBI raids on NDTV’s Prannoy Roy, and said that the law would take its own course.

    The CBI had registered a case against the pioneers of Indian television NDTV founder Roy and Radhika Roy for causing an alleged loss to a bank. Searches were reportedly conducted at the residence of the Roys in New Delhi and three other places including Dehradun.

    Naidu had told reporters: “If somebody does something wrong, but simply because they belong to media, you cannot expect the government to keep quiet.”

    Stressing that the media is free and independent, he said the officials were doing their duty. “The CBI might have received some information. That is why they have taken action,” Naidu said.

    Also read :

    Update: No politics in raids at NDTV offices, CBI must have received some info, says Naidu

     

  • Editors come out in support of NDTV

    MUMBAI: Editors of various reputed media organisations and well-known personalities yesterday came out in support of NDTV, the offices of which and residence of promoters were raided by CBI recently. The Press Club of India had organised a meet to protest against the attack on freedom of press.

    Senior journalist Rajdeep Sardesai said, “I believe in the present atmosphere, silence is not an option. This a moment when we have to be on the right side of history.”

    Senior journalist Kuldip Nayar said, “During the Emergency, nobody had to tell anybody what to do. Today, when we are facing more or less the same situation – not (to) that extent – all of us have to ensure we don’t allow anybody to muzzle free speech.”

    Senior journalist Raj Chengappa said: “Any attack or raid is a serious threat particularly if residences and offices are being raided in such a manner.”

    Senior journalist and former minister Arun Shourie said: “I have a couplet for Narendra Modi: He who was occupying this throne before you. He also had a similar belief that he was God. First they used incentives like ads, then a subterranean atmosphere of fear. Now, they are using a third instrument of overt pressure. They have made NDTV an example of that. Anybody who has tried to lay a hand on the press in India, has had their hand burnt. The CBI has not been able to answer the facts put out by NDTV. There is even an article on The Wire. The facts are irrefutable.”

    He added: “We have only three protections: our solidarity, the court, the protection of our own readers and viewers.”

    Former Rajya Sabha Member HK Dua said: “Last time, most of the press community did not stand up. They crawled, as (L.K) Advani famously said. Then came the defamation bill.
    We got together, it became a national movement. (Late prime minister) Rajiv Gandhi sought talks but we refused. The unity of the press won the battle. The bill had to be withdrawn as the people were against (it). Similar signs are visible now. Unless we are united, we can meet the same fate. This is a wake-up call, we have to be vigilant and cautious of such attacks.”

    Jurist Fali Nariman said: “Freedom after speech is what freedom of speech is all about.
    No one is immune from being prosecuted under a criminal offence, but the manner, circumstances give me reason to believe all of this is unjustified attack on press and media freedom. On 2nd of June, an FIR is lodged by the CBI — seven years after the event. Why it was not brought to light earlier was not mentioned earlier in the complaint. The CBI did not bother to find out. The first thing CBI is expected to do, once a such complaint is filed, is seek NDTV’s response. But that wasn’t done.”

    He added: “When any government agency files a complaint against a media company, it must first enquire from the owners what they have to say in the matter before conducting raids. This is not a matter of courtesy or favour, but a constitutional duty.”

    “Whenever there is a majoritarian government, there is this tendency. We must resist it,” he said.

    India Today group editor-in-chief Aroon Purie said: “I strongly believe the freedom of the media is inviolable in a democracy. Such a move also undermines basic tenets of free speech.”

    Senior journalist Shekhar Gupta: “This is an issue that concerns the mother of all our institutions – the free press. This is an assault on the free press. Social media got us all disoriented. I hope NDTV will continue to do what it is doing. Our job is to speak truth to power.”

    NDTV co-founder Dr Prannoy Roy said: Once I went to China, they asked me aren’t you a bit jealous of our skyscrapers? I said we have the best skyscraper: free speech. This is not just a flimsy case against NDTV. It is a signal to all of us: we can suppress you even if you haven’t done anything. Their message is: crawl, or we’ll come for you. I say: Stand up and they’ll never do.”

  • News Broadcasters Association expresses concern over NDTV raids

    MUMBAI: The News Broadcasters Association (NBA) has expressed its concern over the recent raids conducted by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on the residences of the promoters and office of NDTV, which is a long-standing member of the NBA.

    While the NBA maintained that no individual or institution is above the law, it condemns any attempt to muzzle the media and causing any interference in the free functioning of news operations. Such a move also undermines the basic tenets of free speech enshrined in the Constitution of India, an NBA statement issued NBA secretary-general Annie Joseph added.

    NBA hoped that CBI will not venture into concerted harassment of NDTV/its promoters, and must ensure fair and just investigation by adhering to equity, justice and good conscience.

    The Editors Guild of India had earlier expressed deep concern over the raids conducted by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on the offices of NDTV and its promoters on Monday. Entry of police and other agencies into the media offices is a serious matter, it added.

    NDTV had denied any wrongdoing and termed the raids as “stepping up the concerted harassment” of the news channel and an attempt to “undermine democracy and free speech” and “silence the media,” the release stated. While the Editors Guild maintains that no individual or institution is above the law, the Guild condemns any attempt to muzzle the media and calls upon the CBI to follow the due process of law and ensure there is no interference in the free functioning of news operations, the Guild release signed by office-bearers Raj Chengappa, Prakash Dube and Kalyani Shankar stated.

  • Probing NDTV & officials’ collusion to defraud ICICI, not repayment: CBI

    MUMBAI: Reports in a section of the media have raised certain issues and the statement issued by NDTV has levelled certain allegations against the CBI investigation in the case relating to the promoters of NDTV and others, a CBI statement said.

    It is clarified that searches have been carried out at the premises of the promoters and their offices based on search warrants issued by the Competent Court. CBI has not conducted any search of registered office of NDTV, media studio, news room or premises connected with media operations, the statement added.

    CBI fully respects the freedom of press, and is committed to the free functioning of news operations.

    CBI has registered the case based on the complaint of a shareholder of ICICI bank and NDTV after carrying out due diligence. Denigrating the allegations at this stage of investigation and wrongly accusing the agency of acting under pressure is uncalled for and an attempt to malign the image of the CBI. The investigation is being conducted as per the due process of law and under the jurisdiction of the Court of law. The result of investigation will be filed before the competent Court of law based on the evidence adduced during investigation, the statement added.

    It has been mentioned in the statement of NDTV that NDTV and its promoters have never defaulted on any loan. The allegations under investigation are not regarding the default in loan repayment; but relate to the wrongful gain of Rs 48 crore to the promoters – Dr. Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy, RRPR Holdings Pvt Ltd and a corresponding wrongful loss to the ICICI bank arising from their collusion and criminal conspiracy, the statement added.

    It is alleged in the complaint that the promoters of NDTV, acting in criminal conspiracy with unidentified officials of ICICI bank, violated section 19(2) of the Banking Regulation Act, the Master Circular DBOD No. Dir B90/13.07.05/98-99 dated 28.08.1998 of the Reserve Bank of India and in furtherance of the conspiracy, ICICI bank took the entire shareholding of the promoters in NDTV (nearly 61%) as collateral, and then accepted prepayment of the loan by reducing the interest rate from 19% p.a to nearly 9.5% p.a and as a consequence thereof, causing a wrongful loss of Rs 48 crore to ICICI bank and a corresponding wrongful gain to the promoters of NDTV, the statement added.

    NDTV, in its statement, questions the jurisdiction of CBI by stating that ICICI is a private bank. It is clarified that the Supreme Court, in the case of Ramesh Gelli vs CBI of 2016, held that the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are applicable to the officials of private banks. Therefore, the CBI has jurisdiction to take up investigation of the cases of private banks, the statement added.

    CBI is committed to carrying out the investigation expeditiously and in accordance with the due process of law.

  • Editors Guild urges CBI to follow process of law, NDTV confirms loan repayment

    MUMBAI: The Editors Guild of India, in a press release issued on Monday night, expressed deep concern over the raids conducted by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on the offices of NDTV and its promoters today. Entry of police and other agencies into the media offices is a serious matter, it added.

    NDTV, in various statements, has denied any wrongdoing and termed the raids as “stepping up the concerted harassment” of the news channel and an attempt to “undermine democracy and free speech” and “silence the media,” the release stated. While the Editors Guild maintains that no individual or institution is above the law, the Guild condemns any attempt to muzzle the media and calls upon the CBI to follow the due process of law and ensure there is no interference in the free functioning of news operations, the Guild release signed by office-bearers Raj Chengappa, Prakash Dube and Kalyani Shankar stated.

    Updated NDTV statement: It is shocking that the CBI conducted searches on the NDTV offices and residence of the promoters without even conducting a preliminary enquiry. The CBI has been compelled to file an FIR based on a shoddy complaint by a disgruntled former consultant at NDTV named as Sanjay Dutt, who has been making false allegations. So far, he has not obtained a single order from any of these courts.

    Legal analysts are astounded that where courts have rejected giving any order in all these years, the CBI conducts raids based on what is a private complaint. The allegation appears to be for a loan which has been repaid by Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy more than seven years ago.

    Even though crores of rupees of dues have not been paid by several industrialists and no criminal case has yet been registered against any of them by the CBI, the CBI has chosen not only to register an FIR, but also conduct a search for a loan which has been duly repaid to ICICI Bank. The allegation that no disclosure was made to SEBI and other regulatory authorities is not only incorrect but also does not clothe the CBI with any power to register cases and search which further amplifies the fact that the search by the CBI is only a witch-hunt against independent media.

  • Update: No politics in raids at NDTV offices, CBI must have received some info, says Naidu

    MUMBAI / NEW DELHI: The information and broadcasting minister M Venkaiah Naidu has denied any political interference in the CBI raids on NDTV’s Prannoy Roy, and said the law would take its own course.

    The CBI registered a case against the pioneers of Indian television NDTV founder Roy and his wife Radhika Roy, for causing an alleged loss to a bank. Searches are reportedly being conducted at the residence of the Roys in New Delhi and three other places including Dehradun.

    NDTV, in a statement, said: the CBI stepped up the concerted harassment of NDTV and its promoters based on the same old endless false accusations. NDTV and its promoters will fight tirelessly against this witch-hunt by multiple agencies.

    Naidu, however, told reporters: “If somebody does something wrong but simply because they belong to media, you cannot expect the government to keep quiet.”

    Stressing that the media is free and independent, he said the officials were doing their duty “The CBI might have received some information. That is why they have taken action,” Naidu said.

    The case reportedly is about ICICI bank loan default ofRs 480 million. As per the Supreme Court order in the Global Trust Bank case in February 2016, the court said private banks heads should also be treated as public servants under the Prevention of Corruption Act. According to the FIR, the default by Roy is for a company named RRPR Holdings Private Limited.

    NDTV however said the company and its promoters will fight tirelessly against this witch-hunt by multiple agencies. We will not succumb to these attempts to blatantly undermine democracy and free speech in India. We have one message to those who are trying to destroy the institutions of India and everything it stands for: we will fight for our country and overcome these forces.

    On Twitter, NDTV managing editor Sreenivsan Jain said: “Message is clear: any independent voice in media will be bullied and shut down. Black day.” Executive editor Nidhi Razdan said: “A message to those in the media who are still independent and do their job by fearlessly asking questions. We won’t be intimidated.

    BJP leader Subramaniam Swamy last year sent a letter to PM Modi seeking a CBI and ED probes into charges of money laundering. Last December, the Securities and Exchange Board of India had started proceedings against NDTV and its promoters for not having made a public announcement in 2009 of a ‘change of control’ in the television company. SEBI had in June 2015 imposed a Rs. 2 crore fine on NDTV for “non-disclosure of material information to the stock exchanges.”

    Last week, NDTV announced that it will shut down its business channel NDTV Profit and turn into a full-time infotainment and entertainment channel.