Tag: Narayan Rao

  • NDTV, Astro launch Astro Awani in Malaysia

    MUMBAI: NDTV and Astro have launched a 24-hour news and information channel, Astro Awani, in Malaysia on 6 September. This follows the launch last year in Indonesia of a 24-hour news, infotainment and lifestyle channel.

    With the tagline ‘Our Gateway to The World,’ Astro Awani is the first 24-hour news and information channel in Malaysia.

    Presented in the national language, Astro Awani will have a mixed content of current international news, events and issues which are relevant to the local viewers.

    Astro Awani is one of the four channels that NDTV is going to launch in September. The package includes NDTV lifestyle channel Good Times, Astro Awani, a channel for the Middle East and Metronation.

    NDTV Group CEO KVL Narayan Rao said, “NDTV’s association with Astro has had a great start last year, with the success of Astro Awani in Indonesia. Now, we are delighted to come together again and provide viewers in Malaysia with a comprehensive look at news and topical issues. The channel is a tribute to NDTV’s long standing commitment to delivering in-depth news and information-based programming.”

    Astro TV CEO Rohana Rozhan said, “We observed that our customers want higher quality content in a form that is international news presented from a local perspective. To fulfil this demand, we are proud to introduce Astro Awani. It will feature global news, events and issues from a Malaysian perspective, and will be presented in the national language.”

  • Narayan Rao elevated to NDTV Group CEO

    Narayan Rao elevated to NDTV Group CEO

    MUMBAI: NDTV Limited has elevated its executive director KVL Narayan Rao to group CEO. In his new role, which is effective immediately, Rao will oversee the businesses of the NDTV Group in India and abroad.

    Rao will be responsible for ensuring that the business aspirations of the group are met and that NDTV becomes a global Indian media brand, recognised all over the world for its ethics, high standards and achievements, a company release says.

    Rao has been with NDTV since 1995 and has played a key role in the transition and growth of NDTV from a production house to a broadcaster. In his earlier role as director, he was responsible for human resources, administration and operations of the company.

    The NDTV Group is expanding both its news and non-news business, which will be overseen now by Rao. He will oversee the implementation of a common code of conduct across the group companies and ensure that the group adheres to the highest standards of corporate governance.

    Said NDTV Ltd chairman Prannoy Roy, “With Narayan’s rich experience in media broadcast and his leadership experience, he is the best person to steer NDTV in its rapid growth phase. His strong execution skills, his understanding of the organisation’s culture and his personal integrity make him an obvious choice.”

    “It’s a huge privilege and a great honour and I am delighted to get this opportunity to play a role in NDTV’s future,” Rao said.

    Rao started his career as a journalist with the Indian Express. Thereafter, he joined the Indian Revenue Service and served in different roles, including deputy commissioner of income tax and deputy secretary in the ministry of defence. Rao has a Masters degree in English Literature. He has also graduated from the National Academy of Direct Taxes and has a management diploma in public finance from IIAP/ENA, Paris. He represents NDTV on several international bodies.

  • NDTV Networks Plc, UK, seeks FIPB nod

    NDTV Networks Plc, UK, seeks FIPB nod

    MUMBAI: NDTV Group is setting up a company in the UK as part of its plans to launch a Hindi entertainment channel, sources close to the company say.

    The company, NDTV Networks Plc, UK, is expected to own a stake in the Indian company that will launch the channel. It is not yet clear whether NDTV Networks will wholly own the Indian company or a part of the stake.
    NDTV Networks has already made an application to the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) for approval, stating that the company’s activities would include “non news and current affairs channels.” More details are not available.

    NDTV Ltd. had earlier announced it would form NDTV Ventures to start a slew of TV channels, including a Hindi general entertainment channel. The non-news forays would be undertaken by NDTV Ventures and will have under it the entertainment and new media divisions, the company had said.

    NDTV Group will be raising money to support its entertainment channel, market sources say. The UK-based company will play a big role in lining up investments for NDTV’s expansion plans in the area of non news channels, they add. How this will be structured, though, remains unclear at this stage.

    When contacted, NDTV Ltd. director Narayan Rao declined to comment on the issue. “We will make an announcement of our plans soon,” he said. NDTV’s chief executive for growth and strategy Vikram Chandra also refused to talk on the subject.

    NDTV has roped in filmmaker Karan Johar for the Hindi general entertainment channel. His production house, Dharma Productions, will hold a small equity stake in the channel.

  • CAS switchover modalities will hit broadcasters, MSOs hard; Trai to have final say

    CAS switchover modalities will hit broadcasters, MSOs hard; Trai to have final say

    MUMBAI: A day after the government issued a notification setting 31 December, 2006 as the deadline for the south zones of Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata to be fully “CAS delivered”, it fired the real bombshell – the framework under which addressability would be introduced in the notified areas.

    The backdated (31 July) notification covers a whole range of conditions that impact all constituents of the cable service delivery chain – broadcasters, cable MSOs, last mile operators.

    It even delves into issues of advertising.

    Interestingly, embedded in the fine print of the notification is a clause that allows the government to extend the time frame for the CAS switchover.

    This could be done if the government believes that the arrangements made by MSOs are inadequate and, therefore, “likely to be against the interests of a substantial portion of the subscribers in any notified area.”

    Tasked with overseeing all this is the cable and broadcast regulator, which has been given extraordinary powers in regards to the switchover to addressability in the areas that fall under the CAS notification.

    The areas for CAS implementation are the Kolkata Metropolitan areas, the areas covered by the Municipal Council of Greater Mumbai and the National Capital Region of Delhi.

    The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai), will be the final word on not just pricing of pay channels, but also in the granting of permission to cable service providers to offer addressable services, among a host of other extremely restrictive conditions.

    Some of the key issues the notification covers are:

    Interconnect Agreements

    It is Trai that will determine the “standard interconnection agreement to be used for entering into commercial agreements for distribution in the notified areas, of pay or free-to-air channels among (i) broadcasters and multi-system operators; and (ii) MSOs and local cable operators.”

    (a) Trai will set the maximum limits of security deposit and monthly rental for supply, maintenance and servicing of set top boxes of prescribed specifications to the subscribers on rental basis by multi-system operators in the notified areas;

    (b) tariff for the basic service tier along with the minimum number of free-to-air channels to be provided by the multi-system operators or local cable operators to the subscribers in the notified areas;

    (c) regulations for quality of service to be provided by the multi- system operators or local cable operators to the subscribers in the notified areas.

    Channel Pricing

    (1) Every broadcaster will have to declare the nature of each of its channels as ‘pay’ or ‘free-to-air’ channel as well as the maximum retail price of each of its ‘pay’ channels to be charged by the multi-system operators or local cable operators from the subscribers in each of the notified areas.

    (2) Each broadcaster will have to file the declaration of the nature and prices of channels within 15 days of the date of notification by the government.

    (3) If Trai believes the price declared by the broadcaster for any of its pay channels is too high, it has the right to fix and declare the maximum retail price of such a pay channel or fix a general maximum retail price for all pay channels within which the broadcasters may declare their individual prices for each pay channel.

    (4)Any order issued in this regard by the regulator will be binding on the broadcasters and the multi-system operators and local cable operators.

    (5) If a broadcaster fails to declare the price of any of its pay channels within the prescribed time limit, or fails to comply with the direction or refuses or fails to enter into an interconnect agreement with a MSO permitted by the government within the prescribed time limit, the authority can take interim measures to ensure supply of
    signals.

    (6) If the broadcaster does not comply with the directives issued by Trai, the government may, if asked to do so by the regulator, suspend permission to broadcast the channel in the country.

    (7) Every declaration on pricing filed by the broadcaster will remain valid for one Year. If the broadcaster wants to revise the price of any channel or convert a pay channel to free-to-air or a free-to-air channel to a pay channel, it will have to give one month’s notice to the MSO and subscribers:

    Govt Permission For MSOs, Cable Ops To Operate

    (1) No multi-system operator can provide addressable cable services without permission from the government.

    (2) Every MSO has been given 30 days to apply to the I&B ministry for permission to operate, along with a processing fee of Rs 10,000.

    (3) After receiving the application, the I&B ministry has 30 days to either grant or refuse permission on the basis of information that will include existing operational area, actual number of subscribers and addresses of its local cable operators in each of the notified areas, commercial arrangements with the broadcasters and local cable operators, if any, financial strength, management capability, security clearance and preparedness to supply and maintain adequate number of set top boxes for its subscribers, installation of its subscriber management system and compliance with all other quality of service standards that may be specified by Trai.

    (4) In the event of an MSO failing or refusing to enter into interconnect agreements with a broadcaster of a pay channel or an adequate number of local cable operators in the notified areas or violates the terms and conditions laid down, Trai can take interim measures to ensure supply of signals. Though what these interim measures might involve is not spelt out, it would appear to indicate that the licence to operate would in that particular area would be given to some other MSO.

    (5) MSOs violating the terms and conditions laid down by Trai face revocation of their licence.

    Public Awareness Campaign About CAS

    (1) Every MSO will have to adequately publicise to its subscribers for a period of 30 days, either through advertisements in the print and electronic media or through other means (e.g. leaflets, printing on the reverse of the receipts, personal visits, group meetings with subscribers or consumer groups etc.) the salient features of the CAS scheme.

    These will include:-

    (a) A-la-carte subscription rates and the periodic intervals at which such subscriptions are payable for receiving the various pay channels;

    (b) The refundable security deposit and the daily or monthly rental payable for the set-top box and its detailed specifications such as make, model, technical specifications, user manuals and maintenance centres etc.;

    (c) The number and names of free-to-air channels that the multi-system operator will provide to the subscribers and specific placement of each channel in the prime or non-prime bands;

    (d) The prescribed monthly service charge to be paid by each subscriber for receiving the basic tier service and the number of additional free-to-air channels, if any, offered by the MSO.

    (e) The quality of service standards specified by Trai and the arrangements made by the MSO to comply with these standards;

    (f) The subscriber management system established by the MSO to demonstrate the functioning of the STBs and interacts with the subscribers to explain the various financial, logistic and technical aspects of the system for its smooth implementation;

    (g) The arrangements for resolution of disputes between the MSO, LCOs, and subscribers in respect of the quality of service standards, payments and refunds etc.

    (2) The Authority may also arrange public awareness activities in the notified areas either directly or through authorized officers or consumer organizations etc..

    Supply And Installation of STBs

    (1) Every subscriber who wants to receive one or more pay channels shall, during the public awareness campaign or within 15 days after its expiry, apply to any one of the MSOs granted permission either directly or through any of his linked LCOs, to supply and install one or more set top boxes in his premises as per the scheme approved by Trai and deliver the requisite channels through the same:

    Provided that every subscriber shall be free to buy an STB of approved quality from the open market, if available and technically compatible with the MSO’s system. No MSO or cable operator can force any subscriber to buy or to take on rent the STB from him only.

    (2) Every subscriber who wants to receive one or more pay channels can either buy an technically compatible STB from the open market or apply to anyone of the MSOs either
    directly or through any of his linked LCOs, to supply and install one or more STBs in his.

    (3) Every MSO will have to set up and operationalise its subscriber management system within the determined time frame.

    Dispute Resolution Mechanism

    Every multi-system operator shall be obliged to maintain the quality of service as per the standards, including the arrangements for handling complaints and redressal of grievances of the subscribers, as may be determined by regulation or order by the Authority.

    Trai may look into the efficacy of such arrangements and issue necessary directions to the concerned parties for compliance.

    Transition To Addressable Systems

    (1) Immediately on operationalisation of the SMS and the installation of STBs, every MSO will have to provide pay channels in encrypted as well as unencrypted form for a period of not less than 15 days to test out the quality of service, remove any technical or operational snags and enable the subscribers to become familiar with the operation of addressable systems at their end.

    (2) Before the start of the transition period Trai can call for progress or compliance reports from the service providers.

    (3) If Trai is of the opinion that the arrangements made by the MSOs are not adequate and the switchover to CAS is likely to be against the interests of a substantial portion of the subscribers in any notified area, it may recommend to the government an extension of the notified date by such period as in its opinion is the minimum required for the satisfactory completion of the necessary arrangements by the MSOs.

    Advertisements

    No programme shall carry advertisements exceeding 12 minutes per hour, which may include up to ten minutes per hour of commercial advertisements, and up to two minutes per hour of a channel’s self-promotional programmes.

    The Industry Reaction

    The industry, which is already reeling under government pressure, reacted cautiously as the impact of the fine print was still being studied.

    A cable industry representative, who did not want to be identified, blurted out, “The government seems to have tightened the screws well and proper. The norms are very restrictive.”

    Ashok Mansukhani, chief of MSO Alliance (as apex body of MSOs in India), which had waged a legal war against the government on introduction of addressability, was more liberal in approach.

    “The rules are tough, but fair. Still, it needs to be studied in detail to realize the full impact on the industry,” Mansukhani said.

    As the quick notification of the rules caught the industry napping, a sizeable number of stakeholders were taken by surprise.

    “We still haven’t seen the rules in full to study the impact,” NDTV director Narayan Rao said, but added, “We’d do everything to adhere to government norms.”

    A seemingly non-plussed joint MD of Global News Network (managers of CNN IBN and Channel7) Sameer Manchanda said, “Prima facie the rules seem to be stringent, but there should be a level playing field for everybody and all types of platform and importance should be given to self-regulation.”

    Jawahar Goel, vice chairman of Essel Group (the umbrella organization under which Subhash Chandra undertakes various media and entertainment-related businesses) was more circumspect.

    “Jeena yahan , marna yahan; uske siva jana kahan (we have to carry out our business in India, so have little other option),” Goel said taking off on an old Hindi film song from the film Mera Naam Joker (My Name is Joker).

    On a more serious note, Goel opined that the Zee Group has to conduct business in India and has no other option but to abide by government regulations.

    He, however, did not deny that in the short term, the business of all stakeholders are likely to get affected.

    Speaking to Indiantelevision.com over phone from the US, Star Group India CEO Peter Mukerjea felt that certain clauses in the rules would “create an amount of level playing field” as some TV channels go overboard with advertising.

    To a specific question on the government mandating the quantum of commercial airtime, Mukerjea said, “ Star channels do follow the global standard of 10 minutes of advertising per hour, which may not be true for all channels. In that sense a level playing field is created.”

    Making it clear that he hasn’t yet seen the full text of rules for a CAS regime at the time of filing this report, Mukerjea said that the government’s aim seems to be regulating an area that had been left totally unregulated.

    “The positive fallout of such a norm is that there is also a scope for advertising prices to go up if the demand (for airtime) is more and supply is less. And, all this depends on compelling content,” he said.

    However, a more forthcoming view came from a MSO, which said beyond the hype one should appreciate the fact that the government has tried to regulate the cable industry and recognized it by “bringing it under regulation and defining its services.”

    The MSO added that the industry should have “seen it coming” as the much touted self-regulation was almost absent in the Indian broadcast and cable industry.

    “At a time when self regulation is not there, the government is doing what it should do: specify the norms of various services,” the MSO said.

  • Media companies oppose Broadcast Bill 2006

    Media companies oppose Broadcast Bill 2006

    NEW DELHI: It was day of lobbying here as print and electronic media met up with a government official on Thursday to express serious concern over a draft Broadcast Bill 2006, which despite being in formative stages has the potential of being restrictive.

    The underlying theme of a meeting that media company representatives had with I&B secretary SK Arora was that proposed media norms were simply ways to gag the media, even if it’s still to get a Cabinet nod, and had to be opposed.

    More irksome and dangerous, media companies felt, was an attempt by the government to try draft a legislation without consulting the industry, contrary to what had been done with other media norms (especially the PRB Act relating to the print medium), which smacked of total lack of transparency.

    Though Arora did not hand out any assurances at the meting with the media committee of the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), he did admit that he would try preparing a concept paper based on a draft Cabinet note relating to the Broadcasting Bill 2006 for industry’s feedback.

    The senior government official, who also received a representation from the Indian Broadcasting Foundation separately later in the day, tried his best to allay fears of the media and conveyed that some of the so-called draconian features and restrictions already existed in some form or other in existing pieces of legislation.

    According to some of those who attended the meeting, when confronted with the fact that proposed norms would hamper fair business activities, Arora opined that government’s endeavour was not to be restrictive, but facilitate business and create a level playing field for all.

    Those who attended the meeting included the India Today Group chief Aroon Purie, Business Standard’s CEO and editor T N Ninan, Zee group’s Jawahar Goel, Discovery Network India’s EVP and MD Deepak Shourie, NDTV’s Narayan Rao and Star Group India CEO Peter Mukerjea, The Tribune newspaper editor HK Dua and Reliance-Anil Ambani group’s Tarun Katial.

    That Arora had very little to offer to the media, except carry their feedback to his political masters, was evident when Reliance’s Katial brought up the topic of allowing news and current affairs on private radio FM stations and drew a blank from the government official.

    Though CII is yet to issue an official statement on the meeting, opinion seems to be divided.

    While one media representative termed the meeting “an exercise into futility with lot of work still to be done,” another said that most media companies felt a bit re-assured.

    However, on one issue there was unanimity: the need for electronic and print apex bodies to come together on a common platform to raise voice against restrictive media legislation.

    Increasingly as the government faces flak over the proposed Broadcast Bill, which smacks of restrictions and attempts at media muzzling by introducing a government-controlled regulatory body, industry too is scurrying to get its act together.

    In the middle of June, the I&B ministry had circulated a draft Cabinet note on regulating broadcasting services amongst other ministries for feedback. When leaked in the media, it kicked up a furore.

    Since then, I&B minister Priya Ranjan Dasmunsi has been blowing hot and cold. First he denied existence of the draft. Then he backtracked to say he’d bring in a media-friendly legislation in Parliament to emphasize the very next day that he does not propose any “dilution” or “pollution” in the draft.

    While the government would want to bring the Bill in Parliament in the monsoon session, starting from Monday next, other ministries are yet to send in their feedback that may take up to 15 days for compilation, according to an official of the I&B ministry.