Tag: KSBKBT

  • Star Parivaar’ tops ratings with 13.6 TVR

    Star Parivaar’ tops ratings with 13.6 TVR

    MUMBAI: Star Plus’ ode to its telly stars – the Star Parivaar Awards – has hit ratings gold, landing itself the first position on the TAM ratings charts, beating back even perennial numero uno Kyunkii Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi (KSBKBT) into second position.

    The show, which aired on 4 June, garnered a TVR of 13.6 in the Hindi speaking markets (HSM) C&S 4+ TG, according to TAM data over a total duration of 244 minutes.

    KSBKBT is in the second slot with 13.46 TVR followed by Kahaani Ghar Ghar Ki (KGGK) in the fifth slot at 12.35 TVR.

    To put things in perspective, if one flashes back to 2004, Star Parivaar, clocked 14 TVR and was in the 24th position.

    Star Plus creative director Shailja Kejriwal points out, “The Star ‘Parivaar’ has grown bigger and has seen a flurry of new faces joining the family. So, all in all it is a nice mix of old and new. The ratings are astounding, and this gives us the encouragement to make it even bigger next year.”

    While in the Parivaar’s debut year in 2002 the capacity of the event was 500, 2003 the awards doubled its capacity. This year the capacity was further upped to 3000.

    Kejriwal adds, “No other event in the country has got this kind of numbers, and we have now managed it for three years in a row. Considering today’s fragmented landscape, Parivaar’s delivery is commendable.”

    So, what was really the differentiating factor this time round?

    Kejriwal states that this year, the scale of the event was much more grand. Also, the event this time incorporated action driven acts and stunts which had not been done earlier. Production costs were also upped by 20 per cent which translated into upgradation of costumes, sets, acts…

    The marketing blitz pretty much followed the same template as last year, although the degree was heightened.

    ‘Har Parivaar; Star Parivaar’ which is the base line of the awards was played up with the entire campaign woven across all media. The channel used the ‘Jodi Special’ as the the driver category to promote the property’s interactivity with on ground activities in Delhi and Mumbai. 5.8 million votes came through on ground events and activities by the channel using the push strategy engaging the client in malls and market places.

    A special categories card was also designed and was sent to all publications as a PR exercise.

    When queried about the place of promos Star India senior vice president marketing and communications Ajay Vidysagar states, “We activated transition bumpers as well as break bumpers for three weeks prior to the airing of the event. This time the frequency was a lot higher and better placed.”

    Star Plus also hosted a series of Parivaar specials over the weekends and built it into one capsule before the screening of the actual event.

    The break-up being:

    1) Nomination Special Ep 1
    2) Nomination Special EP 2
    3) Jodi Special
    4) Magic Moments
    5) Red Carpet

    This was followed by the main event. So, the build up to the actual event was very strong. Looking at other Star property deliveries, the Hindi feature film Main Hoon Na clocked 10.76 TVR, while the Diwali special which showcased TV stars celebrating the festivities of the season called Dhoom Machaley clocked 10.3 TVR. The 11th Star Screen Award brought in 7.3 TVR and the latest Rang Barse, Holi special with the whole TV fraternity clocked 11.3 TVR, according to TAM data in the HSM C&S 4+ TG.

    Star’s aim is not only to tap the available TVRs but also get in new viewership. As a prelude to KBC 2, both Star Parivaar and the coming IIFA Awards 2005 are positioned as the initial eye-drawers for the weekend.

    In terms of sheer revenues,”Parivaar’s performance only spells more monies for the channel. The title sponsor being Dabur (Vatika Shampoo) and associates being Faber, Gelusil, Titan Goldsteel, Simba, Phillips, Versa, Everyuth and Godrej Pentacool, Star has in a way managed to prepare its ground for its coming weekend properties,” says a media analyst.

    As they say, it’s getting better all the time!

  • Star Parivaar awards: ‘Sujal-Kashish’ lead in the Favourite Jodi category

    Star Parivaar awards: ‘Sujal-Kashish’ lead in the Favourite Jodi category

    MUMBAI: Heat is on at Star Plus’ Dabur Anmol Shampoo Star Parivaar awards. Within just six days of its launch, the channel has reportedly received over 14,00,000 votes.

    According to the latest reports, Kahiin to Hoga’s Sujal-Kashish are leading the jodi race, Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhie Bahu Thi’s Karan ahead of rest of the screen beta’s and Kyunki …’s Baa is still the hot favourite ‘dadi’. In other categories, like Devar-Bhabhi, Kahaani Ghar Ghar Kii’s Kamal-Parvati are racing ahead, while Kasautii Zingagii Kay’s Sneha is leadind the ‘chhota bachchas’ pack.

    In one of the most popular categories- the Jodis category- has Sujal-Kashish leading the voting race. The love-hate couple are leading the pack, but giving them a competition, albiet not that close, are the old favourites KSBKBT’s Tulsi-Mihir, Kumkum’s Sumeet-Kumkum, and the reel life couple KSBKBT’s Karan-Nandini.

    While last year’s favourite beta was Mihir, this year the ‘son’ who is leading the pack is his beta Karan. The dashing young actor, who made his appearance on KSBKBT as an angry a son of a supposedly wronged woman- Mandira. It’s his realisation of the truth and his love for his father’s family, that has endeared Karan to the viewers. He is leading in the favourite beta category against Sujal (KTH), Praful (Khichdi), Sumeet (Kumkum-Pyara Sa Bandhan), Vikram (Saara Akaash).

    It comes as no surprise that endearing Baa of KSKBT continues to be the most popular Dadi on small screen. This year, she has been nominated in the category that comprises veterans like Dadi of KGGK, Dadi of Sonpari, Nani of Shararat and Baa in Saara Akaash.

    Baa with her remarkable presence and her larger than life performance as the matriarch of the Virani family in KSKBT is leading by 20,000 votes and is ahead of popular categories like Favourite Saut and Favourite Saas.

    While Parvati is a hot contender for the Favourite Bhabhi award along with Kanya from Kabhi Aayi Na Judai, Saroj from Bhabhi, Hansa from Khichdi, and Kumkum from Kumkum-Pyara Sa Bandhan.

    Not to be outdone her reel devar Kamal is currently far ahead of his competitors in the Favourite Devar category that includes Subroto (KZK), Saahil (KSKBT), Rishi (KTH) and Raju (Khichdi).

    Veteran Farida Jalal, as jaadui nani from Shararat is racing ahead of Sona aunty from Sonpari, Dajjal from Hatim and Rani Devi of Shararat. With her impeccable and spontaneous acting, nani has warmed the hearts of her viewers, but Sona aunty is giving her a close competition in the category of Favourite Jaadui Kirdar.

    In the Favourite Chotta Bachcha character, Prerna’s adorable daughter Sneha has left other chhota bachchas in the category absolutely behind, with about three times more votes than Sunny (Gharwali Uparwali Aur Sunny), Karishma (Karishma Kaa Karishma), Jackie(Khichdi) & Fruity (Sonpari).

    The voting is still on for yet another five days, till 10 June. The participants have to sms 7827 and select your favourite star. As an incentive, there are some prizes involved.

  • ‘Turning producer was a logical extension of my career’ : Soni Razdan

    ‘Turning producer was a logical extension of my career’ : Soni Razdan

    Soni Razdan, actor, is not new to audiences. Her metamorphosis into a producer and now, a director, however, has not been as talked-about though. Her forays into production have been few, but not run-of-the-mill. Her first venture as producer was Aur Phir Ek Din on Star Plus, directed by Vinta Nanda, starring Kiran Kumar and Soni herself in lead roles.

    Next came Hamare Tumhare, a story of two sisters who have a strained relationship, due to some mysterious incidents in the past. A fresh storyline and strong performances ensured that both serials left a strong impact on viewers’ minds. Soni is now ready with her third offering Jo Dil Chahe for Zee, which features the lives of five central female characters based in Delhi; their trials and tribulations. Her first venture as director- a movie based on the novel Difficult Daughters, will also go on the floor shortly.

    Soni is placed in a unique position. Neither a big time corporate giant like Balaji Telefilms, nor a struggling producer, she can objectively analyze several issues confronting the industry.

    Excerpts of an interview with indiantelevision.com’s correspondent, Amar.

    What made you turn producer?
    I guess turning producer was a logical extension of my career. I had been an actor for more than 30 years and wanted to give something back to the medium. The most feasible way was to produce the kind of programmes I really liked and which appealed to my sensibilitiesWhat kind of storyline appeals to you?
    Stories that have a strong subject with an enormous scope for drama. Ideally, I love stories based on relationships with a strong undercurrent of passion.

    ‘Ideally, I love stories based on relationships with a strong undercurrent of passion’

    How do you choose a director?
    I chose Vinta Nanda for Aur Phir Ek Din because I have always admired her capabilties for directing and we share a great rapport and understanding. As for Hamare Tumhare, the story and the treatment were both different and new. Also, apart from the two sisters who were the central characters, there were four children who were very important in the development of the story and to whose characters full justice had to be done. Keeping these factors in mind, I had to take someone who was young and had not got typecast into any category.

    On what basis do you choose a channel?
    Frankly, as a producer who has just one serial on air at a time, I am a little selfish in my choice of a channel. I prefer Zee for the viewership it gets my serial and also because I find it more receptive to new ideas. But I am open to considering other channels, including Sahara, which I believe has a great vision. As I roll out more serials, I will also consider other channels.

    Are you open to producing a daily serial?
    Yes, but I will do it only if the budgets are really good. I will not produce a daily just for the sake of producing one.

    What are the disadvantages of producing a daily?
    There are so many disadvantages. It is very difficult to keep a tab on the quality when shooting is on for 20-25 days of the month. The sheer pressure of shooting so many episodes at one go is not the way most creative people would like to work. Besides, due to budget constraints, it is not possible to get good quality actors either.

    Do you like to work with a closed group of actors or do you like to experiment?
    I like to experiment. I like to take on new people depending on the requirements of the role. One of my favourite actors on TV, though, is Kiran Kumar.

    What is your production set up like?
    We have a small set up. I head the creative team, carry out negotiations with the channel, see to the development of the storyline….. I have a team of writers helping me with the story. We have a chief executive producer; with an assistant who oversees the actual organization of the shoots, submission of tapes etc.

    I will do it only if the budgets are really good. I will not produce a daily soap just for the sake of producing one’

    How does your association with Vishesh Films help?
    Vishesh Films is our official financier. Besides, even though he does not like to be involved so much, Mahesh (Bhatt) is always there with his creative inputs. In fact, he had a major role to play in developing Hamare Tumhare.

    Are you continuously hassled by the executive producers in channels over the storyline, casting etc.?
    No, not at all. I feel the involvement of the executive producers is a very valuable exercise. TV is a business of ideas, though I would maintain there is a difference between making suggestions and being maniacal about them. However, I have been lucky not to be forced to do anything unfeasible.

    How often have you been asked to re-shoot an episode ?
    Touchwood. Never.

    How much of financial and mental insecurity does a producer have to put up with today? Wasn’t Zee’s abrupt ending of your programme a major blow?
    There is a huge amount of insecurity no doubt, but that is true of most businesses. With competition warming up, TV has become no different. But as far as the winding up of my serial Hamare Tumhare goes, in all fairness to Zee, we had been asked not to shoot beyond a given number of episodes and we had not exceeded that.

    India is probably the only country where producers don’t get a share of the channel revenues even after forfeiting their rights. Your comment?
    Yes, that’s really bad. The re-run rights are the bare minimum a producer can ask for, because they serve as an incentive to produce better quality stuff. Till now, we did not even have a body to take up these issues but hopefully the Indian Television Academy (ITA) will take them up now.

    Do corporate giants like Balaji and UTV have a monopoly over the best time slots?
    Not that I am aware of.

    Which are the areas where a Balaji or UTV is able to obtain economies of production and save costs vis-?-vis a producer like you?
    A Balaji or UTV is a manufacturing factory. They have their own studios and editing facilities, and this reduces costs drastically. Also, when manpower is employed on a regular basis and optimally utilized, it tends to come cheap compared to when it is hired from time to time.

    Are enough issues being tackled in terms of entertainment or have we reached a dead end?
    On TV, we can never reach a dead end . Yes, about six months ago, there was a dominance of saas-bahu sagas, but Zee’s new programmes have come as a breath of fresh air. See, when a bomb is dropped, the effects of this are bound to be felt all around. Similarly, Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi (KSBKBT) and Kahanii Ghar Ghar Kii (KGGK) led to a trend into which all other channels were indirectly getting carried. But luckily that’s no more the case.

    Which do you think has been the best phase of programming in Indian TV history?
    I feel the best is yet to come. Programming per se is yet to evolve fully. In fact, I would say it is in its infancy stages. The mid-eighties were still a much better phase compared to other phases. We had varied programmes like Yeh Jo Hai Zindagi, Buniyaad, Tamas – all very different from one another and rich in content.

    How do you balance your roles as a producer, actress and now director?
    (laughs) I don’t balance them. They get balanced. In any case, so many things get stalled over here for several reasons – channel approval, finances etc. So it’s really not as hectic as it seems. In fact, I plan to roll out more programs as producer. I feel I am in a position to do that.

    At this point of time, are you really excited about any subject?
    I have a vague idea – a story of a family that spans three continents in three different time periods. I can’t say anything more about it at the moment.

  • Star, Balaji make light of tiff over ‘Kyunki’ clone

    Star, Balaji make light of tiff over ‘Kyunki’ clone

    Reports that there was a dispute between Star India and Balaji Telefilms over the Tamil reworking of the hit soap “Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi Balaji” were downplayed by both the channel and the production house today.

     

    Balaji had been commissioned to do the programme for the Tamil language Sun TV network. Star raised objections after it was noticed that the initial episodes were virtually identical to that of ‘KSBKBT’ being shown on Star Plus.

     

    According to Star corporate communications head Yash Khanna, since Star owns the worldwide rights to the soap it had asked Balaji to change the storyline and the television software production house had agreed to do so.

     

    The Tamil version started this April and 104 episodes have already been shown.

     

    Balaji CEO Sanjay Dosi said the issue had been sorted out and emphasised that Star and Balaji continued to share a most positive relationship.

  • VIEWPOINT: A STORM IN A TEACUP

    VIEWPOINT: A STORM IN A TEACUP

    The Laffaire TRPs for sale has raised a few questions. Even indiantelevision.com was at the receiving end of an anonymous docket yesterday evening containing the same scandalous details about the two TRP systems  INTAM and TAM – as was received probably by CNBC India and scores of other newspapers and magazines. It was addressed to me with Mumbai as the address; no further details were provided. It was delivered by a well-dressed man who obviously was not a courier but an employee of an agency which was commissioned to deliver the dockets. He disappeared as quickly as he came.

    Apparently, an effort was on to disparage the two people meter systems. For reasons known best to the industry. Apparently, the Indian Broadcasting Foundation has been in conversation with the ad agencies and the two research bodies to clean up both INTAM and TAMs acts and the two had been reticient.

    Even as little as two months ago when I met up with the CEO of a channel I was told that the ratings game sucked and the two agencies had lots of holes in their ratings modus operandi. And if indiantelevision.com was really interested in television, we would investigate into the matter and blow the cover off TV ratings in India.

    We simply chose not to pursue the issue. Other publications and magazines were also approached; all of them were wary. Because indeed, everyone in industry knows that TV ratings are not perfect; they are simply meant to be an indicator of viewing trends. Today, it is Star Plus which is leading the ratings game and has been doing so for the past year. Two years back it was Zee TV with Sony neck and neck with it. Zee TV was perched atop the ratings pecking order for four years. Before that DD was Lord of all it aired to, if one went by the diary entry method employed by both IMRB and ORG-Marg. Tomorrow, it could well be SABe TV which shoots up there. Or for all you know Sahara TV.

    Hence, there was no cause for panic and attempting a tehelka, which may well prove to be a wrong turn. One checked with neighbours; one checked with children, one checked with relatives in smaller towns what they were watching and everywhere one got the response – KBC and KSBKBT or Kahaani Ghar Ghar Ki during prime time. All were on Star Plus.

    Like was the case with Zee TV, a couple of years ago. And the ratings reflected that. While we did not know whether the numbers were totally accurate; they at least appeared to reflect what individuals told us.

    To us laffaire TRPs for sale appeared to be a motivated campaign with a single-point agenda: discredit the ratings and hence create doubts about Star Plus pole position in the viewership ratings sweepstakes.

    The documents sent to our office have one attachment which purportedly explains how Star and Balaji Telefilms manipulate the ratings.

    Who stands to benefit if the two are discredited? The other big two: Sony and Zee TV. While the rival channels may roast us for stating this so blatantly, they cannot run away from the fact that they have to focus on the basics: improve their programming; give shows that viewers want and not what advertisers or CEOs friends want to supply. Focus on the basics; focus on the viewer.

    There is a lot of talk doing the rounds in the television industry as to the possible movers behind all this and they need to be mentioned.

    One possibility is that the two rivals got together on the discredit TRPs campaign. After all my enemy is your enemy; so we are friends. Zee TV supplied the list; Sony Entertainment used CNBC to stoke the controversy. After all CNBC is part of the Sony bouquet and has the right SEC audience; blowing the issue on Zee News made little sense; on CNBC it made eminent sense.

    Another is that VNU – the parent of both the systems – could have been behind the campaign. Create a controversy and then go ahead and merge the two systems, with least opposition from reluctant professionals of the two research agencies who want to keep both of them existant.

    The third possibility is that the reporter from CNBC stumbled on the story on her own; got clearance from her boss and the others just rode it happily giving vent to their spleen; and capitalised on the controversy.

    Whatever, be the origins of LAffaire TRPs for Sale, it will result in a new sample; better security of the peoplemeters and the list (you mean no one will be able to get a copy of the list of the viewership sample in future??? ) The purging of Intam and Tam. Who knows a merger, possibly. A more streamlined system.

    The fact is: not one person from the Mumbai sample interviewed on CNBC agreed that there was any interference or coercion from any of the channels to influence them as they went about watching television daily. So whats the storm all about?

    And if at the end of all the cleaning up and expense – which will finally be borne by the cable and satellite television industry, ad agencies and marketers – would it not be funny if the meters start spewing out similar viewership numbers as are available today? Has anyone given a thought to that.