Tag: Kevin Martin

  • Meta shakes up public affairs policy team with Trump set to become president

    Meta shakes up public affairs policy team with Trump set to become president

    MUMBAI: Well, well, so, that’s how the cookie crumbles.

    Meta has replaced its Democrat-leaning chief global affairs officer Nick Clegg with Joel Kaplan who is known for his Republican leanings and was Clegg’s deputy.  Kaplan   was the deputy chief of staff for policy at the White House during the presidency of George W. Bush between 2006 to 2009.

    Clegg a former British deputy prime minister and  an ex-leader of the country’s liberal democrats,  joined Meta in 2018, playing a key role in developing policies related to content and elections. He was named president in 2022.

    Kaplan joined Meta in 2011 and was once vice-president of US public policy at Meta.

    Kevin Martin, the current head of US public policy at Meta, will step into Kaplan’s former role and will be just below him. Kevin was once appointed to the Federal Communication Commission  by George Bush and is also known to be Republican in his leanings.

    The changes are happening just as the Republican party’s Donald Trump is set to take over as the US president. 

    Mark Zuckerberg and team are doing their best not to take steps that can attract his ire and, if anything inadvertently does, his team should be in a position to get it fixed quick.

    If readers recollect, Facebook had taken extreme steps like banning Trump from the social media network for a while but had reinstated his account a while later. Clearly, Meta and Mark Zuckerberg will have to tread carefully as far as the president is concerned.

  • FCC to review rules for telcos obtaining cable TV franchises

    FCC to review rules for telcos obtaining cable TV franchises

    MUMBAI: US media regulatory body The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will on Wednesday vote on whether to make it easier for telecom firms like Verizon and other parties to obtain cable franchises

    Media reports quote FCC Chairman Kevin Martin saying that local franchise authorities at times obstruct and in some cases completely derail new attempts to bring video competition to an area.

    The measure, which will not be made public by the agency until after the vote, has alarmed local franchising authorities, which contend action by the agency may wind up hurting consumers.

    New subscription television providers like the telephone firms reports state must apply with thousands of American cities and towns for permission to offer the service and they have complained that the process could take years.

    The FCC will vote on a plan to limit local authorities to 90 days for reviewing most applications and restrict demands that providers offer unrelated services to cities such as installing playgrounds and streetlamps.

  • FCC hits CBS with record fines for indecency

    FCC hits CBS with record fines for indecency

    MUMBAI: Renewing a campaign against broadcast indecency, the US Federal Communications Commission ( FCC) upheld a decision to fine television broadcasters for violating federal decency limits, including a record $3.6 million for stations that aired a show depicting group sex.

    The agency also upheld its decision to fine 20 CBS stations $550,000 for singer Janet Jackson’s faux pas during the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show.

    All four big-timers–ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC-were fined for indecent content. But, CBS incurred the highest penalties and were fined $3.63 million, the most ever, for an episode of the show Without A Trace that depicted a teen orgy. The fine is to be shared by 111 CBS stations, according to media reports.

    Marking the first proposed fines in more than a year, the FCC addressed more than 300,000 backlogged indecency complaints and issued long-awaited decisions the agency said were aimed at giving broadcasters a better idea of what they could and could not air.

    “Although the scene contains no nudity, it does depict male and female teenagers in various stages of undress,” the FCC said, adding there were shots depicting intercourse and group sex. CBS denied wrongdoing in the cases and said it would “pursue all remedies necessary to affirm our legal rights.” The stations could appeal to the FCC and the federal courts.

    FCC chairman Kevin Martin fired back. “We appropriately reject the argument that CBS continues to make that this material is not indecent.That argument runs counter to commission precedent and common sense.”

    Martin added, “These decisions, taken both individually and as a whole, demonstrate the commission’s continued commitment to enforcing the law prohibiting the airing of obscene, indecent and profane material. We believe that they will provide substantial guidance to broadcasters and the public about the types of programing that are impermissible.”

    The FCC has tightened its reins on all broadcast programming significantly since the Super Bowl incident. A batch of radio rulings will also be forthcoming, quoting FCC officials.

    Federal regulations bar television and radio broadcast stations from airing obscene material and limit them to airing indecent material, such as profanity and sexually explicit content, during late-night hours when children are less likely to be in the audience.

    Congress has been considering boosting fines for violating decency limits to as much as $500,000 per violation from the current maximum of $32,500.

    Around 50 TV shows were put under the scanner, with the FCC refusing to take action on complaints about material in 28 programs, including an episode of Oprah in which teenage sexual activity was discussed.

    On the other hand, Fox was found guilty of violating indecency standards with its 2003 telecast of the Billboard Music Awards. The Parent Television Council was none too pleased when Nicole Richie and costar Paris Hilton used two profane words . Fox was not fined at the time because the FCC was not taking action then against individual uses of expletives. But Martin has said that the agency should be fining each “offensive utterance”.