Tag: junk food

  • Should junk food ads be banned on kids’ channels?

    Should junk food ads be banned on kids’ channels?

    MUMBAI: Just a few days ago, there were whispers of a possible ban on junk food ads on kids’ channels that were quickly rebutted by information and broadcasting minister Smriti Irani. Though the ministry has clarified that such a stand hasn’t been taken, it would be worthwhile to consider the pros and cons of such a move.

    There’s a need to worry about all kids who watch television frequently are susceptible to bad eating habits. According to studies, teenagers who watch television for more than three hours daily are twice as likely to eat more snacks like crisps, biscuits, fizzy drinks and chocolates thanks to the commercials they watch along the way.

    At present, Britannia’s Treat cream biscuits and Fruity Fun cake, Waffy, Rich Feast Yum Pie, Diamond Rings, McDonald’s Snoopy Meals, ITC’s Bingo No Rulz and Dark Fantasy biscuits are some of the brands that are running campaigns on kids’ channels.

    Looking at the situation from a broadcaster’s point of view, a blanket ban on junk food advertisements will hamper their monetisation ability. These ads, however, are likely affecting the health of children. When Indiantelevision.com reached out to kids’ channels, none of them were willing to speak up on the issue.

    FMCG brands will be the hardest hit since kids these days are the driving force behind the purchase choices of parents. The demand may dwindle if they are asked to put a full stop to the advertisements and the market share of their products may nosedive to a certain extent.

    When asked about the merits and demerits of this proposal, Harish Bijoor Consults Inc brand-expert and founder Harish Bijoor says that kids’ channels are meant for kids. “Any brand that is not considered kid-friendly in terms of health, attitude development, learning or frivolity of use, must not be allowed on such channels. That wouldn’t be responsible advertising.” 

    Stratagem Media director Sundeep Nagpal also has the same view as Bijoor. According to him, such proposals are made keeping in mind the welfare of our country’s future. “The eventual outcome would only benefit the children of this country, several millions of whom are getting progressively affected by the consumption of junk food.”

    A news report in 2017 stated that Britannia had around 35 per cent share in premium cream biscuits and the idea was to build the share to 50 per cent in two years. The company will be investing Rs 50 crore on Treat in the next nine to 12 months while the total investment for the premium cream biscuit category would be Rs 100 crore for the same time frame. The company is planning to achieve this through multiple activities, straddling between Pure Magic, Bourbon and Treat.

    Bijoor says that some of the FMCG brands will get affected whereas others will not. Brands that appeal to children without the harmful effects of junk food will find a platform on such channels to advertise. FMCG players that create such products will, therefore, remain unaffected. Nagpal, however, recommends that one shouldn’t fall for the plight of the manufacturers.

    When asked whether the creative and storytelling need to change, Nagpal says, “The powers that be on issues like these should put a stop to such hypocritical practices. Any change in storytelling for such products would be an attempt to sell something harmful under a guise. So, this should not even be allowed under the garb of surrogate advertising.”

    Bijoor believes that the product must be first analysed as being fit for kids’ consumption and only after that should any other development happen.

    According to another media report, ITC expects the chocolate category to contribute to 10 per cent to its food division revenue in the next five years. The company will extend the Sunfeast brand to all core biscuit segments, like Marie (an English tea biscuit), glucose, milk, and crackers. Dark Fantasy, meanwhile, will span the indulgence space and cover products across biscuits and cakes (including Yumfills). Farmlite, catering to the health space (biscuit segment), and Mom’s Magic, in the cookies segment, will be the other two brands.

    Children today are increasingly susceptible to obesity and the growing trend of unhealthy food habits and lifestyles are major offenders. Going by the current trends, the World Health Organisation contends that nearly 70 million children will be overweight or obese by 2025. That’s a scary prediction considering the serious health risks are associated with obesity. Considering the fact that the government told Parliament that nine major operators in the food-processing business have voluntarily decided not to advertise products with high fat on children’s channels while the Food and Beverage Alliance of India (FBAI) is already instituting mechanisms to restrict advertising of food and beverage items concerning children voluntarily, the tide seems to be turning.

    Another approach to reducing the intake of commodities such as pre-packed foods with high salt and fat content, sweetened beverages, chips and among others maybe to impose additional taxes.

    It is clear that a ban on junk food ads on kids’ channels will have far-reaching ramifications for the advertiser-broadcaster ecosystem. At a time when child obesity rates and lifestyle diseases are on an alarming rise, it would be prudent for FMCG players to take a step back and re-examine their advertising strategy and build goodwill in the long run. 

    Also Read :

    No proposal to ban junk food ads on TV: Smriti Irani

    Kids’ candy segment: Communication sees a shift

  • No ‘junk food’ ads on kids shows & channels, recommends govt’s food safety panel

    MUMBAI: The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has put together a report on junk food and suggested a blanket ban on the telecast of such advertisements on kids’ channels.

    The report also recommended discouraging celebrities from endorsing food that is high in HFSS (salt, fat, and sugar) and imposing an extra tax on sweetened beverages and processed foods.

    Apart from sweetened beverages, the junk food category included pizzas, chips, burgers and several Indian foods such as pakoras and samosas, FNB News reported. It had been observed that ads for a majority of HFSS food were aired during kids’  shows and mostly on kids channels.

    Experts flayed the practice of sale of such food by impressing upon young minds, stating that such TVCs influenced the eating habits of the young and made them vulnerable to diseases. Besides, the extra tax on sweetened beverages and processed commodities was recommended as could be seen as a practical approach to cut down their intake.  

    The report also recommended proper and positive nutritional labelling of such products.

    Health Foods and Dietary Supplements Association (HADSA) admits that there was no specific definition stated in any of the regulations for “junk food” in India. It only referred to such food which has no nutritional or health benefit, and a high amount of calories.

    Also Read :

    Healthcare products lead in ASCI norms breach, 143 complaints upheld

    Over 250 complaints of misleading ads about AYUSH products since Jan 2015

  • Celebrities should not endorse junk food say government guidelines

    Celebrities should not endorse junk food say government guidelines

    NEW DELHI: The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has called for strict control on promotions and advertisements that are designed and targeted to children and adolescents across all media.

     

    In guidelines prepared recently with regard to junk food, the FSSAI has also made strong recommendations against celebrity endorsement of such foods.

     

    Consequently, Chief Justice Gorla Rohini and Justice Pradeep Nandrajog in the Delhi High Court have asked amicus curiae N K Kaul to file a detailed response within three weeks segregating what out of the submitted guidelines is enforceable and what is suggestive. The court also stressed on the need to specify the junk food items that should be regulated in schools. The court has now fixed the matter for 6 August.

     

    Criticising the Guidelines which it claims have been ‘diluted’ at the instance of the food industry, the Centre for Science and Environment has said that the a provision put initially in the Guidelines that establishes the need for mandatory self regulation of advertisements has been removed.

     

    Uday Foundation, a Delhi-based non-profit NGO filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in 2010 seeking a ban on junk food sold in schools and around them, regulation of junk food promotion and advertisement, and development of a school canteen policy. In response to this, the court had asked the FSSAI to set guidelines, which were framed recently. The FSSAI submitted these guidelines to the court for “making available quality and safe foods in schools”.

     

    The guidelines were developed by an expert group set up by the FSSAI following directions of the court in September 2013.

  • Ofcom to phase out junk food ads targeted at children

    Ofcom to phase out junk food ads targeted at children

    MUMBAI: UK content regulator Ofcom is going ahead with its earlier announced intentions to restrict television advertising of “junk food” targeting children under 16.

    Television advertising that promote food and drinks high in fat, salt and sugar directed towards children will be phased out in a phsed manner from 1 April onwards.

    To start with the rules will apply to the under 10 year old category with effect from 1 April, while ads targeted at the under 16 year old segment will be implemented after 1 January 2008.

    The three phases will flow out as follows:

    – From 1 April 2007, HFSS advertisements will not be permitted in or around programmes made for children (including pre-school children), or in or around programmes that are likely to be of particular appeal to children aged 4-9;

    – From 1 January 2008, HFSS advertisements will not be permitted in or around programmes made for children (including pre-school children), or in or around programmes that are likely to be of particular appeal to children aged 4-15.

    – As set out in the November Statement, children’s channels will be allowed a graduated phase-in period, with full implementation required by the end of December 2008.

    Ofcom’s co-regulatory partners, the Broadcast Committee on Advertising Practice (BCAP) and the Advertising Standards Authority, are responsible for implementing the new scheduling and content rules and securing compliance respectively. The new rules will form part of the BCAP Television Advertising Standards Code.

    New content rules come into effect immediately for new advertising campaigns. Existing advertising campaigns or those in the final stages of creative execution can be broadcast until the end of June 2007. However, from 1 July 2007 all advertising campaigns must comply with the new content rules, adds the release.