Tag: Indian Broadcasting Foundation

  • SC dismisses as withdrawn IBF petition challenging Bombay HC’s DAS III stay order

    SC dismisses as withdrawn IBF petition challenging Bombay HC’s DAS III stay order

    NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court dismissed as withdrawn, the petition by the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) challenging the Bombay High Court order on the Digital Addressable System (DAS) Phase III implementation.

    The two-judge bench of the court headed by Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar said that a reading of the Bombay High Court’s order did not necessitate any action by the Supreme Court. The court asked the petitioners the grounds on which the High Court order were being challenged.

    Justice Khehar observed that a reading of Bombay High Court doesn’t imply any pan India’s stay. 

    Senior advocate Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi pointed out that other High Courts have also given stay orders in this matter.

    Thereupon, Justice Khehar said in that case IBF should have impugned the other orders and not merely to the Bombay High Court.

    Thereafter, Dr Singhvi withdrew the petition in light of observations made by the judge. It is learnt that a similar petition by the I&B ministry will be up for hearing on 24 February.

    Indiantelevision.com learns that several caveats have been filed by stakeholders who have approached various High Court in the country and got a stay of implementation of DAS Phase III.

  • Indian Broadcasting Foundation cheers TRAI’s decision on differential pricing

    Indian Broadcasting Foundation cheers TRAI’s decision on differential pricing

    MUMBAI: The Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) has welcomed the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s (TRAI) decision to rule out differential pricing.

    “The broadcasting industry is appreciative of TRAI’s decision to rule out differential pricing. IBF has earlier opposed differential pricing terming it to be ‘non-competitive,” said IBF secretary general Girish Srivastava.

    In its response to the consultation paper, IBF had clearly stated that such discriminatory entry barriers would lead to “reduced scope of consumer choice, inducing artificial scarcity.”

    “In our opinion, TRAI’s regulation on prohibiting differential pricing constitutes a milestone as it was against the basic principle of Internet access as no private player should have the power and right to decide which information can be accessed and which is less easily available,” Srivastava added.

    As was reported earlier by Indiantelevision.com, major broadcasters like Star India, Sony Pictures Networks India and Zee Network submitted their comments to TRAI in favour of net neutrality citing the drawbacks of differential pricing for telecom services.

  • Indian Broadcasting Foundation cheers TRAI’s decision on differential pricing

    Indian Broadcasting Foundation cheers TRAI’s decision on differential pricing

    MUMBAI: The Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) has welcomed the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s (TRAI) decision to rule out differential pricing.

    “The broadcasting industry is appreciative of TRAI’s decision to rule out differential pricing. IBF has earlier opposed differential pricing terming it to be ‘non-competitive,” said IBF secretary general Girish Srivastava.

    In its response to the consultation paper, IBF had clearly stated that such discriminatory entry barriers would lead to “reduced scope of consumer choice, inducing artificial scarcity.”

    “In our opinion, TRAI’s regulation on prohibiting differential pricing constitutes a milestone as it was against the basic principle of Internet access as no private player should have the power and right to decide which information can be accessed and which is less easily available,” Srivastava added.

    As was reported earlier by Indiantelevision.com, major broadcasters like Star India, Sony Pictures Networks India and Zee Network submitted their comments to TRAI in favour of net neutrality citing the drawbacks of differential pricing for telecom services.

  • FICCI demands infrastructure status for broadcast industry in pre-budget memo

    FICCI demands infrastructure status for broadcast industry in pre-budget memo

    NEW DELHI: The Indian broadcast, cable and direct-to-home (DTH) sectors have been demanding a infrastructure status for the industry as well as seeking all benefits and incentives available for the infrastructure industry including the availability of finance at a concessional rate.

     

    To this effect, the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) had earlier this month urged the Union Government to grant “Infrastructure Status” to the broadcasting industry.

     

    Now, making this demand, the Entertainment Wing of FICCI has said in a pre-budget memorandum to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley that the sector should be allowed tax concessions as per Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act.

     

    The digitisation process and the deployment of set top boxes (STBs) are heavy capital oriented and thus require huge investments, which may force various amalgamations and thus they should be allowed to set off accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation allowances to be carried forward as per Section 72 A of the Act, the industry body said.

     

    Parity with Manufacturing Industry under Section 72A of the Act

     

    It also said that the disparity between the service and the manufacturing sector is very adversely affecting the growth and consolidation of the Service sector.

     

    The tax benefits under Section 72A of the Act in respect of amalgamation or de-merger (carry forward and set off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation allowances) are currently limited to industrial undertakings or a ship, hotel, aircraft or banking. The definition of industrial undertaking should be widened to include service industry, broadcasters and content production companies.

     

    Rationalisation of Indirect taxes

     

    The rate of taxes, which range from 30 – 70 per cent, especially the entertainment tax imposed by the states, over and above the service tax, are punitive in nature, FICCI said, adding that such punitive level of taxation incentivises unhealthy practices, such as piracy, revenue leakage on account of under reporting of revenues, etc. It is important that the overall taxation level is brought down for the sector as a whole.

     

    State Entertainment tax legislations levy high taxes on the subscription earned by cable operators and DTH operators. The non-availability of credit of central taxes against the state taxes and vice versa increases the tax burden on the entertainment industry. In addition to this, the Central Government has levied service tax at 14 per cent on the transfer of copyrights, which is already being taxed as ‘goods’ under the various state VAT legislations.

     

    Payment for Content Production

     

    FICCI said there is ambiguity since the tax authorities have been adopting a view that the payment towards production of content is in the nature of fees for technical services and subject to tax at the rate of 10 per cent under section 194J of the Act whereas Explanation III to section 194C of the Act clarifies that payments made towards a contract, concerning broadcasting and telecasting including production of programmes for such broadcasting or telecasting, would fall under the definition of ‘work’ for the purpose of section 194C of the Act.

     

    It suggested that to avoid difference in positions adopted by the tax payer and tax department on applicability of relevant section and to mitigate resultant litigation and hardship, a clarification may be issued regarding appropriate classification of content production services and applicability of relevant section for withholding of taxes.

     

    Carriage Fees/Placement Charges

     

    FICCI has demanded that the Government should provide a clarification that the payments made towards carriage fees are not in the nature of royalty or fees for technical services and TDS is required to be made on such payments as per section 194C of the Act.

     

    It said that the tax department is contending that since cable operators are providing technical services, payments made towards placement of channels is subject to TDS under section 194J of the Act.

     

    Broadcasters pay placement or carriage fee to the cable and DTH operators to place their channel in prime bands, which in turn enhances the viewership of the channel. Such charges are paid under a contract merely for placing the channel on agreed frequency bands.

     

    Deduction of tax at source under Section 194H on the “15% agency commission”

     

    FICCI recommended a clarification that no taxes need to be deducted at source by broadcasters on the “15 per cent agency commission” as mentioned in the invoice raised by broadcasters to advertisement agency or advertisers.

     

    FICCI said the 15 per cent agency commission mentioned by broadcasters in its invoices for ad airtime sale raised on ad agency or advertisers is merely a presentation in the invoices and not a real transaction. Neither the broadcasters nor ad agency recognises the same as revenue or expense. It is customary in nature, as is also evident from the fact that even on the invoices raised directly on advertisers; the said 15 per cent agency commission appears.

     

    Broadcasters are not supposed to make any payments towards 15 per cent agency commission mentioned in the invoice, as there is no agreement or arrangement to pay such the commission with ad agencies or advertisers. In fact, broadcasters do not make any payment in respect of the said commission mentioned on the invoices.

     

    At the outset, FICCI said that the Indian media and entertainment industry grew from Rs 918 billion in 2013 to Rs 1026 billion in 2014, registering an overall growth of 11.7 per cent. The industry is estimated to achieve a growth rate of 13 per cent in 2015 to touch Rs 1159 billion. The sector is projected to grow at a healthy CAGR of 13.9 per cent to reach Rs 1964 billion by 2019.

     

    As per FICCI, television clearly continues to be the dominant segment but strong growth had been posted by new media sectors. Gaming and digital advertising recorded a strong growth of 22.4 per cent and 44.5 per cent compared to the previous year.

     

    The benefits of Phase I and II of cable digital addressable system (DAS) rollout, and continued Phase III rollout are expected to contribute significantly to strong continued growth in the TV sector revenues and its ability to invest in and monetise content. The sector is expected to grow at a CAGR of 15.5 per cent over the period 2015-2019.

     

    Tax Exemptions for Radio Broadcasting

     

    While noting that radio is anticipated to see a spurt in growth after rollout of FM Phase III licensing, FICCI asked the Government to consider providing tax holiday of five years for new capital investment in Phase III; reduce customs duty on capital equipment for radio broadcasting to four per cent; and consider service tax exemption for billings to service recipients covered in the negative list.

     

    Tax Holiday for five years for setting up of new screens

     

    Noting that the film sector had shown a minimal growth of 0.9 per cent in 2014 over 2013, FICCI said there had been an increase in piracy, since the number of screens for viewing films had not increased in proportion to the increase in number of films and the number of people viewing these films.

     

    FICCI said that it was essential to extend the benefit to cinema owners in terms of 80-IB of the Act to multiplexes constructed after March 2005 to encourage the set-up of multiplexes and thereby improve the density of cinema houses in the country. This will encourage setting up of new screens in India and help in improving screen density.

     

    Reduction of prescribed time limit under Rule 9A and 9B

     

    FICCI suggested that the existing period of 90 days before end of the financial year (under Rule 9A and 9B of IT Rules) is suitably reduced to grant relief to assessees whose feature films have incurred losses and have been released for exhibition in the last quarter of the financial year.

     

    Under Rule 9A of the Income Tax Rules, if a film producer sells all rights of exhibition of his feature film, the entire cost of production is allowed as a deduction in computing the profits and gains of such previous year.

     

    However, if the film producer does not sell all rights of exhibition of his film, it is released for exhibition on a commercial basis at least 90 days before end of the financial year and the film producer is eligible to claim deduction of the entire cost of production. Otherwise, a feature film is released for exhibition on a commercial basis within a period 90 days before end of the financial year and the producer is eligible to claim deduction of cost of production only up to a ceiling limit and any excess cost of production is carried forward to the next financial year. This ceiling limit is the amount of revenues generated by the feature film in the financial year.

     

    In certain cases where not all rights of exhibition of a feature film are sold and it is released for exhibition on a commercial basis within 90 days before end of the financial year, the feature film performs poorly and it is exhibited only for a short duration. Consequently, the film producer may not recover costs. In such cases in view of the prevailing IT Rules, the film producers are unable to claim a deduction of entire production cost and, the loss is to be carried forward to the next financial year. Accordingly, such film producers are unable to claim losses in the year the feature film is released for exhibition despite no further scope of income. A similar situation exists in the case of expenditure of distribution rights in view of Rule 9B of IT Rules.

     

    Exemption of Service Tax on major inputs/input services

     

    FICCI recommended that major inputs / input services that are used in relation to theatrical rights in movies, be exempted from service tax. Since the major inputs/input services used in relation to revenue earned from theatrical rights are taxable, the CENVAT credit of service tax paid on such inputs/input services is blocked in the supply chain due to applicability of CCR. Eventually such taxes result in increase of the cost of production thereby defeating the purpose of providing an exemption on the output service.

     

    Re-instatement of the Service Tax exemption on Transmission of digital cinema

     

    FICCI also recommended reinstating the exemption to digital cinema service distributors, as it existed earlier under notification 12/2007 ST of 1 March, 2007, which had been rescinded with the introduction of the negative list.

     

    Service tax on transmission of digital cinema is a direct cost to the producers since the same is in relation to theatrical exhibition of cinematograph film (which is an exempt service with effect from 1 April, 2013) and hence no credit can be availed of such service tax.

     

    Clarity on export status of post-production services

     

    FICCI asked for clarity on the inclusion of post-production activities in the exclusion to this Rule. Alternatively, the second proviso to the Rule 4(a) of the POPS Rules be re-worded.

     

    Given the various technological advances in the Indian film industry, many Indian entities are hired by foreign producers for carrying post production activity. For such activities, the content is temporarily imported into India (either physically or electronically) and re-exported after completion of service. Post-production activities, which may be performed in India, do not find explicit mention in the proviso that carves out exceptions to the performance based rule in POPS Rules.

     

    Service Tax exemption to on-screen advertising in cinemas

     

    The industry body said on-screen advertising in cinemas and multiplexes should be exempted from levy of service tax.

     

    After 1 October, 2014, the negative list of services was amended and on-screen advertising within cinemas is liable to service tax.

     

    The on-screen advertising within cinemas caters to advertisers with small businesses, with limited resources. For large advertisers, on-screen advertising is a secondary medium of advertising at best and they have a small contribution to onscreen advertising within cinemas. The on-screen advertising forms an important source of revenue for the exhibitors, which are already reeling under the pressure of multiple taxes. Re-instatement of service tax on such revenue will only increase their tax burden.

     

    Applicability of Service Tax on food and beverages sold within Cinemas

     

    The food and beverages (F&B) sold in theatres during movies are subject to VAT under local state laws and the same is paid by the exhibitors. But with effect from 1 April, 2011, restaurant services became taxable whereby services rendered by any air-conditioned restaurant serving alcohol were made liable to service tax and later with effect from 2013 the condition of serving alcohol was withdrawn. However, it is still not clear whether the sale of F&B by cinema halls and multiplexes is covered in this service.

     

    Unlike restaurants, there is no seating arrangement, no cutlery is provided and no waiter serves F&B and hence there is no element of service involved in any meaningful manner.

     

    FICCI said levy of service tax is intended on “restaurants” rendering certain services and is not intended on sale of food, beverage and snacks from candy counters in cinema theatres.

     

    Service Tax exemption on entry to award functions, musical performance etc.

     

    The Union Budget of 2015 had amended the negative list of services and effectively withdrawn the unconditional service tax exemption, which was granted to tickets for award functions, music events, sports events etc. With effect from June 2015, service tax is payable when the consideration for admission to entertainment events such as award function, concert, pageant, sporting event etc. is more than Rs 500 per person.

     

    However, FICCI said payment for admission to any event is already liable to a high state entertainment tax and levying of a service tax of 14 per cent over and above the high rates of entertainment imposes a high burden on the entertainment sector.

     

    The industry body asked for a clarification to specify that the value of ticket for the purpose of levy of service tax on such admission (where the ticket price is more than Rs 500) should be the value excluding Entertainment tax. It also wanted clarification on if service tax is payable, the same should be computed on a value exclusive of Entertainment tax and accordingly no service tax should apply on entertainment tax amount.

     

    Customs Duty exemption on film equipment under the ATA Carnet

     

    The ATA Carnet permits duty free temporary admission of goods into a member country. The list of exempted products covers filming equipment too. However, there is no Customs Notification in order to exempt the import of filming equipment from the levy of Customs Duty, on the lines of the ATA Carnet.

     

    FICCI recommended that Customs Duty should be exempted on film equipment under ATA Carnet. The film production equipment is very expensive and not easily available in all countries because of which the film producers are compelled to temporarily import the same on lease for the purpose of producing the film. In absence of a customs notification to exempt filming equipment, the ATA Carnet duty exemption benefit cannot be extended to import of filming equipment.

    These imports significantly increase the burden of tax on the film producers.

     

    Proposals for Animation, Gaming and VFX Industries

     

    FICCI also made some recommendations for the Animation, Gaming & Visual Effects (VFX) industries.

     

    It asked for a 10-year tax holiday for the Animation, Gaming, and VFX industries; and removal of withholding tax on revenues accruing from sales of mobile games in non-India markets as well as removal of withholding tax on the development contracts given to mobile game developers outside India.

     

    FICCI also asked for removal of withholding tax paid by expats working in India for Indian mobile game development companies.

     

    The Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) applicability for units undertaking animation work in SEZ should be withdrawn to encourage export of animated contents.

     

    The industry body wanted restoration of STPI advantage scheme for AVGC or ITES for another 10 to 20 years and cover/encourage exports as well as IP creation.

     

    To promote domestic gaming market, excise duty on local manufacture should be brought down to nil (similar to film and music industry). This will enable CVD to be brought to zero also. The effective reduction in taxes would be around 15 per cent. Import duty on consoles (gaming hardware) to be brought down to zero per cent to increase the installed base to enable the local developer ecosystem to flourish.

     

    There should be a provision of 50 per cent reimbursable MDA (Market Development Assistance) for travel and registration fees to international market events.

     

    The Government should extend support under Market Development Assistance (MDA) activity for Indian companies to exhibit by setting Indian Pavilions in the world markets. What is needed is to help bringing local production companies to international markets, collect and disseminate information and support creating the infrastructure needed for a healthy media market to develop.

  • FICCI demands infrastructure status for broadcast industry in pre-budget memo

    FICCI demands infrastructure status for broadcast industry in pre-budget memo

    NEW DELHI: The Indian broadcast, cable and direct-to-home (DTH) sectors have been demanding a infrastructure status for the industry as well as seeking all benefits and incentives available for the infrastructure industry including the availability of finance at a concessional rate.

     

    To this effect, the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) had earlier this month urged the Union Government to grant “Infrastructure Status” to the broadcasting industry.

     

    Now, making this demand, the Entertainment Wing of FICCI has said in a pre-budget memorandum to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley that the sector should be allowed tax concessions as per Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act.

     

    The digitisation process and the deployment of set top boxes (STBs) are heavy capital oriented and thus require huge investments, which may force various amalgamations and thus they should be allowed to set off accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation allowances to be carried forward as per Section 72 A of the Act, the industry body said.

     

    Parity with Manufacturing Industry under Section 72A of the Act

     

    It also said that the disparity between the service and the manufacturing sector is very adversely affecting the growth and consolidation of the Service sector.

     

    The tax benefits under Section 72A of the Act in respect of amalgamation or de-merger (carry forward and set off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation allowances) are currently limited to industrial undertakings or a ship, hotel, aircraft or banking. The definition of industrial undertaking should be widened to include service industry, broadcasters and content production companies.

     

    Rationalisation of Indirect taxes

     

    The rate of taxes, which range from 30 – 70 per cent, especially the entertainment tax imposed by the states, over and above the service tax, are punitive in nature, FICCI said, adding that such punitive level of taxation incentivises unhealthy practices, such as piracy, revenue leakage on account of under reporting of revenues, etc. It is important that the overall taxation level is brought down for the sector as a whole.

     

    State Entertainment tax legislations levy high taxes on the subscription earned by cable operators and DTH operators. The non-availability of credit of central taxes against the state taxes and vice versa increases the tax burden on the entertainment industry. In addition to this, the Central Government has levied service tax at 14 per cent on the transfer of copyrights, which is already being taxed as ‘goods’ under the various state VAT legislations.

     

    Payment for Content Production

     

    FICCI said there is ambiguity since the tax authorities have been adopting a view that the payment towards production of content is in the nature of fees for technical services and subject to tax at the rate of 10 per cent under section 194J of the Act whereas Explanation III to section 194C of the Act clarifies that payments made towards a contract, concerning broadcasting and telecasting including production of programmes for such broadcasting or telecasting, would fall under the definition of ‘work’ for the purpose of section 194C of the Act.

     

    It suggested that to avoid difference in positions adopted by the tax payer and tax department on applicability of relevant section and to mitigate resultant litigation and hardship, a clarification may be issued regarding appropriate classification of content production services and applicability of relevant section for withholding of taxes.

     

    Carriage Fees/Placement Charges

     

    FICCI has demanded that the Government should provide a clarification that the payments made towards carriage fees are not in the nature of royalty or fees for technical services and TDS is required to be made on such payments as per section 194C of the Act.

     

    It said that the tax department is contending that since cable operators are providing technical services, payments made towards placement of channels is subject to TDS under section 194J of the Act.

     

    Broadcasters pay placement or carriage fee to the cable and DTH operators to place their channel in prime bands, which in turn enhances the viewership of the channel. Such charges are paid under a contract merely for placing the channel on agreed frequency bands.

     

    Deduction of tax at source under Section 194H on the “15% agency commission”

     

    FICCI recommended a clarification that no taxes need to be deducted at source by broadcasters on the “15 per cent agency commission” as mentioned in the invoice raised by broadcasters to advertisement agency or advertisers.

     

    FICCI said the 15 per cent agency commission mentioned by broadcasters in its invoices for ad airtime sale raised on ad agency or advertisers is merely a presentation in the invoices and not a real transaction. Neither the broadcasters nor ad agency recognises the same as revenue or expense. It is customary in nature, as is also evident from the fact that even on the invoices raised directly on advertisers; the said 15 per cent agency commission appears.

     

    Broadcasters are not supposed to make any payments towards 15 per cent agency commission mentioned in the invoice, as there is no agreement or arrangement to pay such the commission with ad agencies or advertisers. In fact, broadcasters do not make any payment in respect of the said commission mentioned on the invoices.

     

    At the outset, FICCI said that the Indian media and entertainment industry grew from Rs 918 billion in 2013 to Rs 1026 billion in 2014, registering an overall growth of 11.7 per cent. The industry is estimated to achieve a growth rate of 13 per cent in 2015 to touch Rs 1159 billion. The sector is projected to grow at a healthy CAGR of 13.9 per cent to reach Rs 1964 billion by 2019.

     

    As per FICCI, television clearly continues to be the dominant segment but strong growth had been posted by new media sectors. Gaming and digital advertising recorded a strong growth of 22.4 per cent and 44.5 per cent compared to the previous year.

     

    The benefits of Phase I and II of cable digital addressable system (DAS) rollout, and continued Phase III rollout are expected to contribute significantly to strong continued growth in the TV sector revenues and its ability to invest in and monetise content. The sector is expected to grow at a CAGR of 15.5 per cent over the period 2015-2019.

     

    Tax Exemptions for Radio Broadcasting

     

    While noting that radio is anticipated to see a spurt in growth after rollout of FM Phase III licensing, FICCI asked the Government to consider providing tax holiday of five years for new capital investment in Phase III; reduce customs duty on capital equipment for radio broadcasting to four per cent; and consider service tax exemption for billings to service recipients covered in the negative list.

     

    Tax Holiday for five years for setting up of new screens

     

    Noting that the film sector had shown a minimal growth of 0.9 per cent in 2014 over 2013, FICCI said there had been an increase in piracy, since the number of screens for viewing films had not increased in proportion to the increase in number of films and the number of people viewing these films.

     

    FICCI said that it was essential to extend the benefit to cinema owners in terms of 80-IB of the Act to multiplexes constructed after March 2005 to encourage the set-up of multiplexes and thereby improve the density of cinema houses in the country. This will encourage setting up of new screens in India and help in improving screen density.

     

    Reduction of prescribed time limit under Rule 9A and 9B

     

    FICCI suggested that the existing period of 90 days before end of the financial year (under Rule 9A and 9B of IT Rules) is suitably reduced to grant relief to assessees whose feature films have incurred losses and have been released for exhibition in the last quarter of the financial year.

     

    Under Rule 9A of the Income Tax Rules, if a film producer sells all rights of exhibition of his feature film, the entire cost of production is allowed as a deduction in computing the profits and gains of such previous year.

     

    However, if the film producer does not sell all rights of exhibition of his film, it is released for exhibition on a commercial basis at least 90 days before end of the financial year and the film producer is eligible to claim deduction of the entire cost of production. Otherwise, a feature film is released for exhibition on a commercial basis within a period 90 days before end of the financial year and the producer is eligible to claim deduction of cost of production only up to a ceiling limit and any excess cost of production is carried forward to the next financial year. This ceiling limit is the amount of revenues generated by the feature film in the financial year.

     

    In certain cases where not all rights of exhibition of a feature film are sold and it is released for exhibition on a commercial basis within 90 days before end of the financial year, the feature film performs poorly and it is exhibited only for a short duration. Consequently, the film producer may not recover costs. In such cases in view of the prevailing IT Rules, the film producers are unable to claim a deduction of entire production cost and, the loss is to be carried forward to the next financial year. Accordingly, such film producers are unable to claim losses in the year the feature film is released for exhibition despite no further scope of income. A similar situation exists in the case of expenditure of distribution rights in view of Rule 9B of IT Rules.

     

    Exemption of Service Tax on major inputs/input services

     

    FICCI recommended that major inputs / input services that are used in relation to theatrical rights in movies, be exempted from service tax. Since the major inputs/input services used in relation to revenue earned from theatrical rights are taxable, the CENVAT credit of service tax paid on such inputs/input services is blocked in the supply chain due to applicability of CCR. Eventually such taxes result in increase of the cost of production thereby defeating the purpose of providing an exemption on the output service.

     

    Re-instatement of the Service Tax exemption on Transmission of digital cinema

     

    FICCI also recommended reinstating the exemption to digital cinema service distributors, as it existed earlier under notification 12/2007 ST of 1 March, 2007, which had been rescinded with the introduction of the negative list.

     

    Service tax on transmission of digital cinema is a direct cost to the producers since the same is in relation to theatrical exhibition of cinematograph film (which is an exempt service with effect from 1 April, 2013) and hence no credit can be availed of such service tax.

     

    Clarity on export status of post-production services

     

    FICCI asked for clarity on the inclusion of post-production activities in the exclusion to this Rule. Alternatively, the second proviso to the Rule 4(a) of the POPS Rules be re-worded.

     

    Given the various technological advances in the Indian film industry, many Indian entities are hired by foreign producers for carrying post production activity. For such activities, the content is temporarily imported into India (either physically or electronically) and re-exported after completion of service. Post-production activities, which may be performed in India, do not find explicit mention in the proviso that carves out exceptions to the performance based rule in POPS Rules.

     

    Service Tax exemption to on-screen advertising in cinemas

     

    The industry body said on-screen advertising in cinemas and multiplexes should be exempted from levy of service tax.

     

    After 1 October, 2014, the negative list of services was amended and on-screen advertising within cinemas is liable to service tax.

     

    The on-screen advertising within cinemas caters to advertisers with small businesses, with limited resources. For large advertisers, on-screen advertising is a secondary medium of advertising at best and they have a small contribution to onscreen advertising within cinemas. The on-screen advertising forms an important source of revenue for the exhibitors, which are already reeling under the pressure of multiple taxes. Re-instatement of service tax on such revenue will only increase their tax burden.

     

    Applicability of Service Tax on food and beverages sold within Cinemas

     

    The food and beverages (F&B) sold in theatres during movies are subject to VAT under local state laws and the same is paid by the exhibitors. But with effect from 1 April, 2011, restaurant services became taxable whereby services rendered by any air-conditioned restaurant serving alcohol were made liable to service tax and later with effect from 2013 the condition of serving alcohol was withdrawn. However, it is still not clear whether the sale of F&B by cinema halls and multiplexes is covered in this service.

     

    Unlike restaurants, there is no seating arrangement, no cutlery is provided and no waiter serves F&B and hence there is no element of service involved in any meaningful manner.

     

    FICCI said levy of service tax is intended on “restaurants” rendering certain services and is not intended on sale of food, beverage and snacks from candy counters in cinema theatres.

     

    Service Tax exemption on entry to award functions, musical performance etc.

     

    The Union Budget of 2015 had amended the negative list of services and effectively withdrawn the unconditional service tax exemption, which was granted to tickets for award functions, music events, sports events etc. With effect from June 2015, service tax is payable when the consideration for admission to entertainment events such as award function, concert, pageant, sporting event etc. is more than Rs 500 per person.

     

    However, FICCI said payment for admission to any event is already liable to a high state entertainment tax and levying of a service tax of 14 per cent over and above the high rates of entertainment imposes a high burden on the entertainment sector.

     

    The industry body asked for a clarification to specify that the value of ticket for the purpose of levy of service tax on such admission (where the ticket price is more than Rs 500) should be the value excluding Entertainment tax. It also wanted clarification on if service tax is payable, the same should be computed on a value exclusive of Entertainment tax and accordingly no service tax should apply on entertainment tax amount.

     

    Customs Duty exemption on film equipment under the ATA Carnet

     

    The ATA Carnet permits duty free temporary admission of goods into a member country. The list of exempted products covers filming equipment too. However, there is no Customs Notification in order to exempt the import of filming equipment from the levy of Customs Duty, on the lines of the ATA Carnet.

     

    FICCI recommended that Customs Duty should be exempted on film equipment under ATA Carnet. The film production equipment is very expensive and not easily available in all countries because of which the film producers are compelled to temporarily import the same on lease for the purpose of producing the film. In absence of a customs notification to exempt filming equipment, the ATA Carnet duty exemption benefit cannot be extended to import of filming equipment.

    These imports significantly increase the burden of tax on the film producers.

     

    Proposals for Animation, Gaming and VFX Industries

     

    FICCI also made some recommendations for the Animation, Gaming & Visual Effects (VFX) industries.

     

    It asked for a 10-year tax holiday for the Animation, Gaming, and VFX industries; and removal of withholding tax on revenues accruing from sales of mobile games in non-India markets as well as removal of withholding tax on the development contracts given to mobile game developers outside India.

     

    FICCI also asked for removal of withholding tax paid by expats working in India for Indian mobile game development companies.

     

    The Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) applicability for units undertaking animation work in SEZ should be withdrawn to encourage export of animated contents.

     

    The industry body wanted restoration of STPI advantage scheme for AVGC or ITES for another 10 to 20 years and cover/encourage exports as well as IP creation.

     

    To promote domestic gaming market, excise duty on local manufacture should be brought down to nil (similar to film and music industry). This will enable CVD to be brought to zero also. The effective reduction in taxes would be around 15 per cent. Import duty on consoles (gaming hardware) to be brought down to zero per cent to increase the installed base to enable the local developer ecosystem to flourish.

     

    There should be a provision of 50 per cent reimbursable MDA (Market Development Assistance) for travel and registration fees to international market events.

     

    The Government should extend support under Market Development Assistance (MDA) activity for Indian companies to exhibit by setting Indian Pavilions in the world markets. What is needed is to help bringing local production companies to international markets, collect and disseminate information and support creating the infrastructure needed for a healthy media market to develop.

  • TDSAT reflects on unprecedented course of MIB in Star – Arasu case

    TDSAT reflects on unprecedented course of MIB in Star – Arasu case

    NEW DELHI: The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Arbitration Tribunal (TDSAT) hearing a case by a local cable operator against Star India, described as ‘strange and unprecedented’ the course adopted by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) in responding to its question relating to denial of digital addressable system (DAS) licence to the Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd.

     

    Following an order on 11 August asking the MIB to give its stand on the issue, the Ministry had sent ‘a note to the Tribunal through a messenger.’

     

    Passing its order in the presence of the Section Officer on 14 August, the Tribunal said the Ministry should send a senior level officer and also take an advocate to represent it and may additionally file an affidavit giving its point of view. It made clear that it was not accepting the note brought by the Section officer and was returning it.

     

    The Tribunal had early this month put out a notification asking broadcasters who may want to join the case to get impleaded.

     

    The application by Star India related to a cable operator giving its signals in analogue mode to Chennai – which had gone digital in the first phase – and in violation of the letter of intent by giving signals to Chennai when the agreement was only for the rest of Tamil Nadu.

     

    Listing the matter for 2 September, TDSAT also said Star India, respondent in the case filed by cable operator Thamizhaga Cable TV Communication, New Delhi, was free to negotiate with Arasu and other multi-system operators (MSOs) for areas in Chennai for DAS and outside Chennai for analogue transmission.

     

    At the same time, TDSAT chairman Aftab Alam and members Kuldip Singh and B B Srivastava said that there would be no disconnection of signals until the next date.

     

    It also directed that Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) should be impleaded as a party since other broadcasters were also giving signals to Arasu for Chennai though it did not have the DAS licence. Option was also given to other broadcasters if they wanted to be impleaded.

     

    However, the Tribunal held Arasu guilty of transmitting television signals in Chennai in analogue mode, and at the same time guilty of using Star signals in the metropolis without any authorization from Star India.

  • AIDCF appoints Saharsh Damani as secretary general

    AIDCF appoints Saharsh Damani as secretary general

    MUMBAI: The All India Digital Cable Federation (AIDCF) has appointed Saharsh Damani as its secretary general.

     

    With a career spanning over a decade in various analytical and strategic roles, Damani will pilot the federation’s work and support the president and the federation in seeking solutions on industry issues. Damani will also endeavour to build a strong and sustainable MSO sector in India.

     

    AIDCF president V D Wadhwa said, “Saharsh’s wide experience in dealing into research, planning and strategic issues will be of immense help to the Federation. I take this opportunity to join my fellow members in welcoming Saharsh to AIDCF.”

     

    Prior to joining AIDCF, Damani led research at the Indian Broadcasting Foundation, the preeminent body of television broadcasters’ in India. He has worked in various industries such as Information Technology, Building Materials, Life Sciences and Media on strategy, M&A and research related areas. 

  • TDSAT sets aside amendments for commercial & ordinary subscribers

    TDSAT sets aside amendments for commercial & ordinary subscribers

    NEW DELHI: Two amendments made by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to its tariff orders that aimed at preventing broadcasters from giving their channels directly to the subscribers and putting commercial subscriber at par with ordinary subscribers were today struck down by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Arbitration Tribunal (TDSAT).

     

    TDSAT chairman Aftab Alam and member Kuldip Singh said the two amendments were ‘quite unsustainable and we are thus constrained to set aside the impugned amendment orders.’

     

    The amendments referred to are the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Second) Tariff (Twelfth Amendment) Order 2014 dated 16 July, 2014 and the Telecommunications (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Fourth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff (Fourth Amendment) Order 2014 dated 18 July, 2014 by which similar amendments were made in the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services(Second) Tariff Order 2004 dated 1 October, 2004 (relating to non-addressable or analogue systems) and the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Fourth) (Addressable Systems) Tariff Order 2010 dated 21 July, 2010 (relating to addressable systems) respectively.

     

    The Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) and the Federation of Hotels and Restaurant Association of India (FHRAI) had challenged the amendments as the commercial subscriber is put at par with the ordinary subscriber and the tariff orders treat as equal groups of subscribers that are inherently unequal and are also so recognised in their different definitions in the tariff orders.

     

    The impugned amendments introduce mainly three changes: firstly, the broadcaster is no longer allowed to provide its channels directly to a subscriber, be it an “ordinary subscriber” or a “commercial subscriber;” secondly, the terms “commercial establishment” and “commercial subscriber” are defined elaborately and classified separately from “ordinary subscriber” and thirdly, though defined and classified separately from “ordinary subscriber,” for the purpose of charges for receiving supply of channels, the very large and highly heterogeneous body of “commercial subscriber” is en-block put completely at par with the “ordinary subscriber.”

     

    The appellants are aggrieved by the amendments in so far as the commercial subscriber is put at par with the ordinary subscriber and contend that as a result of the impugned amendments, the tariff orders treat as equal groups of subscribers that are inherently unequal and are also so recognized in their different definitions in the tariff orders.

     

    The Tribunal said even while the hearing of the present appeal before the Tribunal was underway, TRAI issued the Telecommunication (Broadcasting & Cable) Services (Second) Tariff (Fourteenth Amendment) Order 2015 on 6 January, 2015 that inter alia restates the impugned amendments in the Second and Fourth tariff order. Consequently the appellants have filed an application for amending the appeal with a view to challenge the restatement of the impugned amendments in the fourteenth amendment of the Second tariff order.

     

    Allowing the petition, TDSAT said proviso 6 and 7 to clause 3 of the fourteenth amendment along with the explanation appended to proviso 7 are also set aside.

     

    It said TRAI must now undertake a fresh exercise ‘on a completely clean slate. It must put aside the earlier debates on the basis of which it has been making amendments in the three principal tariff orders none of which has so far passed judicial scrutiny. It must consider afresh the question whether commercial subscribers should be treated equally as home viewers for the purpose of broadcasting services tariff or there needs to be a different and separate tariff system for commercial subscribers or some parts of that larger body. It is hoped and expected that TRAI will issue fresh tariff orders within six months from to-day.’

     

    TDSAT said that now that the impugned tariff orders are quashed, the question that arises is the rates that commercial establishments are to be charged, especially those that were excluded from the tariff protection by the seventh amendment of the Second tariff order until TRAI comes out with the fresh tariff order.

     

    The seventh amendment to the Second tariff order and the first amendment to the Third (CAS Area) tariff order were quashed by the judgment of the Tribunal dated 28 May, 2010 but those were kept alive by the Supreme Court for a period of three months from 16 April, 2014, the date of the order by which the Court confirmed the Tribunal’s judgment.

     

    As that period is long over, TDSAT said it would not be proper to revive the tariff amendment orders dated 21 November, 2006. As a consequence, the un-amended Second, Third and Fourth tariff orders will come into play and commercial subscriber would, by default, get bracketed with ordinary subscriber.

     

    In other words though the impugned amendments in the tariff orders are quashed by this judgment, TDSAT said for practical purposes the situation will continue to remain the same. This is because despite two orders by the Supreme Court to consider the question of tariff in respect of commercial subscribers within specified times periods, TRAI has not been able to produce the tariff that would satisfy judicial scrutiny.

     

    “This is evidently a highly anomalous situation and to remedy it TRAI must consider whether to issue an interim tariff order dealing with the matter until it takes a final call on the subject. TRAI should take a decision in regard to any interim arrangement within one month from today.”

     

    The Tribunal said, “We are fully mindful that TRAI has been painstakingly grappling with this matter for a long time. We also recognise that the issue is highly complex and no easy answers are available. We feel that a good deal of confusion and misunderstanding has resulted from the fact that the seventh amendment of the Second tariff order came to be issued just three days before the pronouncement of the judgment by the Supreme Court in the first round of litigation. TRAI can hardly be blamed for this as it had acted in pursuance of the direction of the Supreme Court by which the Court had modified the status quo order passed at the time of the admission of the appeal. But the result was that in framing the seventh amendment to the Second tariff order, TRAI did not have the benefit of the pronouncement of the Supreme Court in the matter. At the same time the Supreme Court could not get to know how the First and the Second tariff orders were perceived by their maker, the regulator and to what object and purpose those tariff orders were made according to the regulator.”

     

    The seventh amendment to the Second tariff order and the amendment to the Third CAS areas tariff order were eventually quashed by the Tribunal and in the judgment TRAI came in for some strong criticism.

     

    TDSAT said it appeared that as a result of this, TRAI went to the other extreme in coming up with the impugned tariff orders. All the different kinds of commercial subscribers being put en block at par with the ordinary subscriber appears to be as arbitrary and unreasonable as the carving out of a very small segment of hotels [namely, (i) hotels with rating of three stars and above, (ii) heritage hotels and (iii) any other hotel/motel, inn and such other commercial establishment providing board and lodging having 50 or more rooms] for exclusion from the tariff protection.

     

    “We are strongly of the view that what is required in the matter is a far more nuanced approach. We rather feel it is high time that TRAI should stop making any further amendments in the different tariff orders and take a completely fresh and holistic view on the question of tariff in broadcasting services. As a result of repeated amendments, the Second, Third and Fourth tariff orders have become so complicated that it has become difficult even to follow the exact import of a provision without examining all the amendments made earlier in the Principal tariff order. How much the tariff orders have become clumsy and unwieldy is evident from their very names as is sought be demonstrated in the opening lines of this judgment. We, accordingly, expect that as the whole country is now to come under the DAS regime, TRAI will undertake a fresh exercise and come out with a single consolidated instrument covering broadcasting services,” the Tribunal said.

  • Commercial and non-commercial subscribers should have different tariff under DAS: IBF

    Commercial and non-commercial subscribers should have different tariff under DAS: IBF

    NEW DELHI: The Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) has said that the Digital Addressable System (DAS) tariff order was violative of Article 14 of the Constitution as it equated ‘equals with unequals.’

     
    Abhishek Malhotra told the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) that the stand taken by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) was also contrary to the stand taken by it over the last 10 years.
    He said that commercial subscribers could not be charged at the same rate as other subscribers who received television signals in their homes.

     
    The bench was hearing the petition by IBF challenging the DAS tariff order issued in July by TRAI relating to commercial subscribers.

     
    In the tariff order, TRAI had said that commercial establishments who do not specifically charge its clients/guests on account of providing/showing television programmes and offer such services as part of amenities are to be treated like ordinary subscribers wherein the charges would be on per television basis.

     
    In cases where commercial subscribers specifically charge its clients/guests on account of providing/showing television programmes the tariff would be as mutually agreed between the broadcaster and the commercial subscriber.

     
    TRAI had also said that the commercial subscriber was to obtain television service only from a distribution platform operator (MSO/DTH Operator/IPTV operator/HITS operator).

     
    The tariff order amendment has been brought out as per the directions of the Supreme Court. It is expected that with the coming into force of these changes in the regulatory framework, the distribution of TV services to the commercial subscribers would be streamlined and the services would be available to them at competitive rates.

     

  • Shailesh Shah moves on from IBF

    Shailesh Shah moves on from IBF

    MUMBAI: After more than two years as Indian Broadcasting Foundation general secretary, Shailesh Shah has decided to move on.

     

    Shah, who had taken charge in February 2013, ended his relationship with the Foundation in November, this year. With over 28 years of experience in a variety of industries, Shah pushed IBF’s efforts in building a robust and profitable broadcasting industry in India.

     

    Currently, the Foundation’s deputy director Radhakrishnan Nair is looking after the responsibilities left vacant by Shah.

     

    Nair, who has over 33 years of experience in publications and television, has been associated with IBF since 2001. A post-graduate in public administration, Nair manages the Foundation’s day-to-day functioning, orchestrate several issues in various forums and committees, help in advocacy with the government and in particular, weigh in on legal and regulatory issues with deft counsel.

     

    No formal decision has yet been taken on who will take charge as the next general secretary of IBF.

     

    In September, at the 15th annual general meeting (AGM), Star India CEO Uday Shankar was appointed as the new president of the Foundation.

     

    The IBF board also elected Punit Goenka as vice president – measurement, N P Singh as vice president – distribution, Rajat Sharma as vice president – strategic affairs and Rahul Johri as treasurer.