Tag: India

  • ‘The game development and design visualisation markets have grown the quickest for us’ : Rob Hoffman- Autodesk Global product marketing manager media and entertainment division

    ‘The game development and design visualisation markets have grown the quickest for us’ : Rob Hoffman- Autodesk Global product marketing manager media and entertainment division

    Autodesk which manufactures software technologies for the media and entertainment industry as one of its major activities, is looking to grow the business in India.

     

    Realising that a lot of production facilities in the US are doing their film, TV and gaming work from India, the company is keen to aggressively tap this market segment.

     

    Indiantelevision.com’s Ashwin Pinto caught up with Autodesk Global product marketing manager media and entertainment division Rob Hoffman to find out more on how the firm’s software is helping the media industry.

     

    Excerpts:

    For a software solutions company catering to manufacturing, building and construction, how much of revenue does the media and entertainment segment contribute?
    The 3D entertainment space is a sizeable business for Autodesk. Our core areas have always been R&D and designing products like Autocast. We cover the areas of film, television, game development and design visualisation.

     

    For us, the game development and design visualisation markets have grown the quickest. You now have next generation gaming consoles like Playstation 3, Xbox 360 and Nintendo. There is a huge demand for game titles.

    Could you shed light on how your solutions accelerate collaborative digital content creation workflow?
    We have 3Ds Max 2008 and Maya 2008. We have done a lot of work to accelerate the creative work that our clients do. We do this in two ways. We have worked on the two softwares so that they perform much faster on the new generation of hardware – whether they be multicore or multiprocessor workstations, latest operating systems or graphics cardsware.

     

    We are trying to take advantage of new technologies coming out and take advantage of the speed these technologies give our software. We have also done a lot of work with the user interface and the workflows of both our softwares. The aim is that artists complete their projects much faster. Something that takes six steps to complete in the past we have managed to reduce to three steps.

     

    This is a very important goal for us as it represents time savings for the artist. Modelling and animation type features have helped us achieve this. Our aim is to enable clients achieve their tasks with much more efficient tools.

    In what manner have your products been used to enhance films?
    Our 3D products are used extensively on films like Pirates Of The Caribbean, Shrek, Spiderman. Maya has been used a lot here. It has been an extensible software from the standpoint that production facilities and artists are able to enhance the software or extend its capabilities through different kinds of scripting. The software also has rich features in animation, modelling and the ability to create different types of visual effects.

    You mentioned gaming as growing the quickest. What is the work being done here?
    We work closely with the large game facilities globally to find out what challenges they face and then we try to address that within our software. We have added games specific features and functionality in the 2008 releases of our software.

    Could you shed more light on how the two products have been enhanced?
    With Maya one of the big things that artists and production facilities have been telling us is that they needed the product to run faster not just on existing hardware but also on new hardware.

     

    They also need the artists to work faster on the software in terms of the graphic user interface and the workflow. We have done work on modelling capabilities. We have enhanced the functionality of features that artists are used to.

     

    We have also done a lot of work on performance. So we have done a lot of work to take advantage of either a single core or a multicore workstation. We have rewritten a lot of the software algorithms to make it inherently faster.

     

    The Maya Mesh Smooth workflow, for instance, has been dramatically streamlined. You can now preview a smoothed mesh while editing the mesh cage – with a strong performance, particularly on multiprocessor workstations. Other much-requested workflow enhancements include the ability to position objects along a curve, replace objects within a scene, and convert instances to objects.

     

    To make it more effective on game consoles we have a new hardware shader API. With Maya clients can effectively create and display sophisticated looks for content destined for the next-generation game consoles. In particular, native support for DirectX HLSL shaders in addition to the existing CgFX support lets clients work with assets in the viewport and see them as they will be seen on the target console. Artists get better representation of the content they are creating using Maya. They don’t have to continuously go back and forth between Maya and the game engine.

     

    We have also done work on character animation. We have new rigging and skinning capabilities. We have got new non-destructive skin editing capabilities. The animator can now add more bones to an arm without disturbing the surface object. Maya also supports a large number of operating systems from Windows to Linux. We now also support Windows Vista 32 and 64
    bit.

    What about 3Ds Max?
    For 3Ds Max we have worked on the viewing of a large, complex scene. It has been known to work with large amounts of data. Artists can have a character with several million polygons. The performance is really good. The issue was that if the artist had tens of thousands of objects with millions of polygons the performance would be slow.

     

    We have worked on 3DS Max so that the artists will get the same performance with several objects that they would get working with one object.

     

    It is about being faster and working with larger amounts of data. Our aim is to allow the artist to focus on the art itself as opposed to focussing on the tools and spending time trying to find out how to use them. Our product also allows artists to get a better representation within the interactive environment. Clients also do not have to go through a trial and error process.

     

    We have done a lot of work on the pipeline. A lot of artists have used scripting as a way to automate or enhance 3Ds Max. We have made the software become more intuitive for artists who are not as technically savvy. This way the scripting capabilities are opened up for artists who traditionally would not have used it in the past.

    What advantages does Autodesk provide vis-?-vis the competition?
    Our products are industry standard software. So there are more people trained on our software. This is because our software is used widely. Artists can get a job more easily if they know how to use our software. We also spend heavily on education. We invest in building an education curriculum for schools.

     

    We also print our own learning tools. We have DVDs. We do community work as well. We have a community website where artists can come and share ideas. Since Autodesk is a big and stable company it allows to invest in supporting software development or customer service or technical assistance.

    Due to education programmes we are seeing the number of artists grow rapidly in India. We see India as a market that has come in and will help out the rest of the world create content

    What potential do you see in India for growing the business?
    The potential is great. Right now you are seeing more work being done in India not just to create local content but also for the global market. A large number of talented artists can be found in India. So a lot of production facilities in the US are doing their film, TV and games work from India.

     

    Due to education programmes we are seeing the number of artists grow rapidly in India. We see India as a market that has come in and will help out the rest of the world create content.

    How many Indian clients do you have and what is the strategy being followed to grow the business here?
    We have a huge number of artists using our software. It is growing daily. We are doing different types of awareness activities. We will be conducting roadshows across the country. We will have super user events where we will bring customers from large production facilities like Industrial Light and Magic. People will talk about projects like Pirates Of the Caribbean.

     

    A lot of development work for our software has been done in India. As far as partnering with Indian software firms to enhance our offerings, this is something we will always look into. It is a question of whether or not it makes sense at a certain time to do so.

    Globally who are some of your major clients and what have been the key learnings working with them?
    We have clients throughout the world. Some of them are Planet Digital in New Zealand, Industrial Light and Magic, Disney, Dreamworks in the US, The Moving Picture Company in Europe. These firms really push the capabilities of the software. So we constantly learn about their requirements and challenges.

     

    They do things never done before. It is about learning where the industry is going and what are the issues that will come up.

    What are some of these issues?
    There are two challenges right now. The first one is that there is a need for talented artists. If an artist has talent, any job they want can be done with any production facility in the world. This is why we work on education initiatives. We do a lot of work on learning tools and work with schools and universities.

     

    The other challenge is that the entertainment industry’s work is getting more complex. Films like Lord Of The Rings mean that viewers expect to see bigger and more beautiful effects. So production facilities have to constantly outdo themselves. In television we are moving from standard definition to high definition.

     

    The themes and characters are more complex. On the games front, the amount of data the consoles can handle is larger than the amount of content that the companies had to deal with in the past. Can software work with these large amounts of data in an efficient manner? That is what clients look for.

     

    With the transition from standard to high definition in television, there is a need for new software capabilities. For those working in traditional broadcasting they have to now adopt a more film like production process. The data complexity that they work with is starting to come close to film.

     

    The other issue that they run into is that although they are working with more complex data, their budgets are much smaller compared to film. The timelines to finish the production are much shorter. Our aim has been to see that artists get high quality of work in a less amount of time. Our software has been used in commercials, interviews as well as episodic TV shows.

    Could you talk about Autodesk’s R&D facilities?
    For 3Ds Max we have development facilities in Montreal, and Toronto. We have development groups working on the software. We also have a pure science group that works on new technologies. They work on different ways to approach problems.

     

    The other thing to remember is that when we develop software, we work closely with the production facilities using them. We use their knowledge to help our developers create better software. Production facilities give us their perspective and ideas on how we can better serve them.

    What role does the Autodesk reseller network play in expanding your presence globally?
    They play an important role globally for us. They are the ones who work and talk with our customers on a day to day basis. We have a close relationship with our resellers throughout the world.

     

    Resellers give us feedback on customer’s opinions. We also ensure that our resellers are knowledgeable and skilled. They have to be familiar with the industry they are addressing.

    What is Autodesk University?
    This is a networking event held annually. As of now, we only hold it in the US. This year it will be in Las Vegas. The event allows us to better understand the requirements of clients.
  • WPP arms foray into content globally, healthcare in India

    MUMBAI: Ad agencies are making forays into new areas in a bid to increase revenues. The leader WPP and its arms have taken the lead. Globally, JWT has already entered the content business and producing shows for television.

    Closer home, WPP’s Sudler & Hennessey, one of the leading global healthcare communications firm, has launched its operations in India in lieu for the forthcoming WTO (World Trade Organisation) norms which will change the name of the marketing and communication game for India’s pharmaceutical companies.

    Glossy men’s magazine Gear and ad agency J Walter Thompson are teaming up to produce pop culture TV programming.
    The first project is a half-hour music series called Conversations which will be hosted by Gear editor in chief Bob Guccione Jr. Guccione founded Spin magazine in the ’80s and still has many contacts with musicians. There is no word yet on where the show will run.

    The crossover from magazines to TV and film has become an increasingly popular trend. From CosmoGirl to Outdoor Life, magazines have been lending their names to TV programs to expand revenue streams and to expand brand awareness. Leading men’s magazine Maxim recently inked a deal to produce movies.

    Meanwhile, WPP’s Sudler & Hennessey (S&H) has entered the Indian market through 50:50 tie-up with Rediffusion DY&R. The JV firm will offer communication services for the healthcare segment. Formed nearly 60 years ago, S&H has a presence in more than 17 countries with an annualised billings of over $900 million. The group boasts of several global clients such as Glaxo Smithkline, Pfizer, J&J, Novartis, Roche – all of which have a presence in India.

    S&H will have two divisions – S&H Communications and Intramed. The first division will focus on OTC (over the counter) and prescription brands whereas Intramed will develop educational and awareness programmes. The various services on offer include brand positioning, medical education and communication, professional marketing and promotion, consultative assessment, consumer marketing and promotion, corporate brand identity, package design and market research.
    The unorganised sector comprises of a major chunk of the Indian healthcare segment and the absence of inadequate laws (related to patents) add to the woes of the organised players. S&H will offer a viable alternative to companies who wish to communicate and educate the consumers. S&H has also developed models to enable pharma companies to work with doctors and directly with consumers.

  • ‘Language feeds can get us 30 per cent more viewership’ : Shashi Kalathil – Neo Sports CEO

    ‘Language feeds can get us 30 per cent more viewership’ : Shashi Kalathil – Neo Sports CEO

    Neo Sports has had a testing time. The distribution deal with Star did not work out and the two channels – Neo Sports and Neo Sports Plus – did not find space on cable networks. This, in turn, impacted ad revenues.

    Now with Australia and Pakistan touring India, Neo is ramping up the distribution of its two channels. And it is hoping that strong content will drive in viewership and revenue.

    In an interview with Indiantelevision.com's Ashwin Pinto, Neo Sports CEO Shashi Kalathil reveals the gameplan for the company.

    Excerpts:

    Has Neo Sports gone through a rough weather ever since its launch almost a year back?
    The going has been tough. There was uncertainty on the regulation front. We had mandated Star to handle our distribution, but our channels had serious problems of being carried on cable networks. Cricket also went through its ups and downs, with the World Cup being the lowest point for the sport. There was a lot of media hype which made a not – so – good situation worse.

    What were the factors that made you terminate the distribution contract with Star and decide to do it on your own?
    We had an arrangement with Star. While I do not want to get into details as the matter is under arbitration, I will admit that we got almost zero delivery. We found that we would not be able to survive as a channel if we did not reach anyone. Besides, the payments that were contractually due to us were delayed – or never arrived.

    Did it also badly impact your ad revenue?
    Our ad revenue was hurt as a result of the Star deal. We got away with it to some extent in the Sri Lanka series by keeping ad rates high and through strategisation where some matches aired on Doordarshan. However, we could not fully exploit the Bangladesh Test series. That would have been worth at least Rs 70-90 million. We could not realise even one fifth of that.

    How have you worked out on your distribution strategy?
    We have covered one third of the cable networks. We went to the smaller towns first as there the declaration is much better. A lot of viewership comes from rural areas. We signed with direct-to-home (DTH) service provider Tata Sky. We expect to sign with Dish TV soon. We are also stitching deals with the south-based cable networks.We are now approaching the big multi-system operators (MSOs) like Incablenet, Hathway Cable & Datacom and Siticable. By the time the Australia series starts we will be in three fourths of cable & satellite (C&S) homes.

    Since the matches have to be shared with Doordarshan, doesn't it affect the kind of deals that Neo is able to strike with the cable operators?
    No! The sharing of feed has been going for a long time. The 2003 World Cup was shared. There are guidelines. Last year for a while, the Supreme Court had taken a view on this kind of activity. India-South Africa was a rare example where DD did not air the matches.

    We have a situation where the pubcaster does not bid for cricket but takes feed when it wants to do so. Besides, there is the issue of encryption.

    What was the write off that Neo Sports got from BCCI due to the non-encryption of DD's signals?
    DD's footprint extends from China to the Middle East. We had a protection clause in case of circumstances that dilute the value of our BCCI rights. If DD sends an unencrypted signal, then how can you sell the rights in those markets?

    Right now there are a lot of cricket rights coming up for grabs. Is Neo Sports going after any of these or are you first trying to justify the BCCI investment?
    It isn't a sequential process. If there are rights that are of value, we will bid for them. Right now what we are seeing is that the price appreciation for these boards has not been as high as what it was for the ICC and BCCI rights.

    If someone gets the BCCI rights which are huge, you will see polarisation happening around the ICC rights. These two rights are the definitive ones in the cricket world; nothing else comes close. About 70 per cent of cricket that India plays in the next 13 months will be on Neo. That is an awesome depth to have.

    For the Australia and Pakistan tours, in terms of coverage what are the kind of innovations being looked at?
    We are keen on language feeds. You can get 30 per cent viewer addition doing this. Traditionally, the South has been neglected in terms of the regionalised feed. Neo Sports Plus will be broadcasting the matches in Hindi, Tamil and Telugu while Neo Sports will have English language transmission.

    We are looking at virtual advertising and programming innovations. We are also looking at interactivity on DTH.

    How challenging is it to push up ad rates to match rising acquisition costs?
    The cricket market is well set up. There are certain clients who advertise heavily in it. The economy is opening up which will allow you to have better inventory utilisation. There are ways to exploit cricket like having multiple language feeds.

    There is also a proliferation of general entertainment and movies channels which is resulting in further fragmentation. This will make the monolithic viewership of cricket more cost effective for brands and more valuable. Break viewership is becoming a serious issue for advertisers. On movie channels, often the break might be too long and people surf. Cricket's format is built to counter this.

    You will eventually be able to do multiple visual feeds for advertising. Now, though, it is still expensive and messy. With addressable delivery platforms like DTH coming in, the dependence on advertising will gradually fall.

    'If someone gets the BCCI rights which are huge, you will see polarisation happening around the ICC rights. These two rights are the definitive ones in the cricket world'

    How would you describe the perception of cricket at the moment among viewers and advertisers?
    I don't think that it is changing. Yes, there is noise made in the media on perceptions of how India is faring. It has to do with the quality of the opposition, how they are perceived. However, I do not think that cricket viewership or ad revenues are as sensitive as what the media says it is. When India did not do well in South Africa last year, people said that the sport was in trouble. Then we did well at home against Sri Lanka and the same media said that this was the best team for the World Cup.

    There is huge interest in the Australia series as it takes place during the festive season. Cricket in media parlance offers viewership that other programming cannot match. This will not change.

    Which are the clients with whom Neo Sports has signed long term deals?
    Perfetti and Hero Honda are our anchor sponsors. The concept is to have someone who wants a long term relationship with cricket on board. We have predictability to our calendar. So a client knows that Australia, Pakistan England, South Africa or Sri Lanka will be visiting us. So if a client does media activity, he knows that a footprint is available.

    How many anchor sponsors do you want to have?
    Initially, we had thought of having four anchor sponsors. However, the media space is getting so competitive that we held back a little bit as we did not want to preclude a large media buyer. There are emerging segments like retail and financial services that will become large. We are waiting for the media environment to settle down before we make more long term deals. There is a risk and also a de-risk in long term deals. You might end up paying more. You might end up paying less. Management is about dealing with it.

    During the World Cup there was a lot of grumbling about the deluge of ads. Steve Waugh went public about it in a column. What is Neo Sports' gameplan to ensure that commercial considerations do not interfere with viewer enjoyment?
    Cricket has a certain format which allows you space for ads – between overs, when a wicket falls, and also during the lunch interval. I think that the World Cup was a situation where matches were going beyond midnight. So perhaps the broadcaster was trying to get in as many ads as possible in the first half as viewership would certainly drop precipitously during the second half.

    In terms of domestic cricket with the push that has been given to it by Neo Sports, has there been any increase in viewership?
    We have had a good experience with domestic cricket. Now that our distribution issues have been settled, we will do innovations around domestic cricket.

    We don't air every domestic match. Cricket is tiered at various levels. We broadcast the best part of it. I have heard arguments about having less matches and fewer teams which I will leave for the administrators to settle. But at the end of the day, a Ranji Trophy final has value. It is the question of packaging it. There is also an awareness issue. People have not gotten used to watching domestic cricket. However when they find that the coverage quality is as good as what you get for an international match, there is stickiness. Last year's data shows that domestic cricket has potential. It is for us to develop that.

    However, the ad fraternity does not seem to be getting on board domestic cricket. Is there a perception problem in the market?
    The product needs to be developed and defined. Once you do that and take it to the advertiser, it will draw interest. But it will not happen overnight. There is still work to be done.

    What is the status regarding your second channel Neo Sports Plus?
    One part of its identity is to be an adjunct to Neo Sports. So Neo Sports Plus airs cricket in local languages. We were clear at the beginning that we wanted to adopt a regional multi language feed for it.

    Neo Sports Plus also airs other sports like German soccer, Italian league. We have badminton, cycling, motorsports. We have also found that rugby got a strong niche viewership among males.

    Can we flesh out the definition of Neo Sports Plus to go beyond cricket? That is something we are working on. Other sports have a growing niche. In the long term, you can grow it to a mass level like what EPL has done. Activities were done that led to the product definition being unique. However, no other sport can substitute cricket. The assumption that if India does poorly, a cricket fan will watch another sport is wrong. Our research tells us that a lot of ODI watchers in India do not watch any other sport.

    Could you shed light on the investments made in technology?
    We are set to go live with broadcast management system ForeTV from MSA Focus. This follows the solution's recent implementation at Neo's Mumbai headquarters for $4 million. The Fore TV Broadcast management system allows Neo Sports the ability to efficiently manage the proliferation of new revenue streams that these rights will inevitably generate.

    Unlike traditional systems which treat each stream separately, ForeTV offers a consolidated solution for total revenue management, encompassing income from Internet Protocol Television (IPTV), advertising, sponsorship, pay-per-view (PPV), interactive (iTV) and video on demand (Vod). This system will be fully integrated into workflow of the channel, automation, editing and financial software allowing seamless process from acquisition, production and post production, transmission and billing at the end of the process.

    On the production front, we have installed Vizrt Virtual studio, a virtual studio for sport production. This allows Neo to create a number of different sets for each sport and change it at the flick of a button. There is no need for storing and changing physical sets. The advantages of using Vizrt virtual studio are flexibility in different backdrops, virtual monitors in the set and incorporation of sport results directly to the set. Vizrt Graphics are template based, allowing for rapid changes and are especially suited for the ever changing sport environment.

  • ‘Blogumentary is our USP’ : Amar K Deb- Channel [V] India head honcho

    ‘Blogumentary is our USP’ : Amar K Deb- Channel [V] India head honcho

    Thirteen years on, Star India’s music channel is experimenting with ‘blogumentary’ content and has adopted the tagline Channel [V] made by you.

    The recipe for getting more eyeballs in a genre which is seen to be stagnating also includes the reality format.

    In an interview with Indiantelevision.com’s Richa Dubey, Channel [V] India head honcho Amar Deb speaks about his plans to incorporate user generated content as a key value of the channel in its new avatar while hanging on to the central positioning of being a “music channel.”

    Excerpts:

    Is there pressure for music channels to reinvent as their revenues are stagnating?
    We have revenues going up by 25 per cent every year. Advertisements and trailers are a major source of our income.

    MTV has recently repositioned itself as a youth channel. Is Channel [V] also looking to target youth with alternative content outside music?
    Channel [V] is a music channel. We love and believe in promoting music. On Channel [V] music is flanked by other stuff like glamour, humour, and fun which are also youth centric.

    So you advocate the benefits of non-music properties?
    Get Gorgeous is one of the highest rated shows on the channel. It’s great because we found some really beautiful looking girls who are not models and they went on to become Miss India and Miss Universe.

    We also discover new faces and talent with shows like Launch Pad. Our promos are popular and have got terrific responses. We won 17 awards at Promax, New York. Our average is of getting around 40 awards every year. That is a good sign.

    How do you split up the music and non music shows?
    We are a music channel and our programmes are all music centric. We largely have music based shows except for a couple of shows like Get Gorgeous. We stick to music while some or other fun things keep happening like Simpoo, Channel [V] IQ etc.

    What about the interactive elements that MTV has introduced?
    Channel [V] has come up with that by introducing blogs in our content mix. This happened in January and we have got a good response.

    How did you go about selecting bloggers?
    We had around 2000 people applying for it. We reviewed 200 and finally choose ten of them. Those ten were given hand held cameras and they shot the concert in there own creative ways.

    Following this, we did Launch Pad and Get Gorgeous which was also shot by bloggers. With this trend, we have got more and more viewers and people participating in the contests run by us. Thus reinforcing our stand as – Channel [V] made by you.

    How else have you extended Blogumentary on Channel [V]?
    After the Channel [V] concert, entire eight sessions at Hard Rock Café for Launch Pad was shot by bloggers. Get Gorgeous was shot by Bloggers and that is the speed in which we will take the entire concept forward. Blogumentary is our USP and we see others following us.

    What happens to the production team if bloggers play such an important role?
    Our production team is always there to help our bloggers. It is just a kind of innovation that we are doing. They are the ones who direct the bloggers. The post production team works really hard to make the entire program look interesting. They make sure that bloggers create things that get viewers hooked on to our content.

    On Channel [V] music is flanked by glamour, humour & fun which are also youth centric’

    Is this reflecting the new face of Channel [V] which has turned 13?
    For the first time on Indian television, we did a ‘blogumentary’ in Channel [V] concert. Fans and young people had cameras and were shooting the eventwhich saw performances from Atif Aslam, Akon and many more.This resulted in an eight week, spectacular television series of half hours.

    With reality shows gaining importance even among music channels, what is your take on the inclusion of this format into programming?
    We did reality with Popstars 1 and 2 and Super Singers. These were not talent hunts. They provided platforms for people to perform. However, we are not doing traditional reality shows where judges throw tantrums and walk out. On Channel [V] nothing is scripted. Everything is spontaneous and real.

    But isn’t controversy a necessary ingredient for a successful reality series?
    Unfortunately, today’s channels have lost the sense of reality and they are not able to do justice to it. If you do something just for the heck of it to create sensation, it does not prove to be reality.

    What are the upcoming properties in the pipeline?
    We will unveil My India Report, which is also based on the blogging format. There is a recruitment procedure going on right now which is also online. We want to know whether the new generation really lives with the values that our forefathers lived with. We want to know the views of today’s generation on various issues. It’s like a docudrama wherein five young people go out, speak to people, and capture it. They will together document what it is to be an Indian today.

    The show is still in the pre-production stage. Currently, we are looking for the kids who will travel across the country. The recruitment is happening online. We expect to launch it in three month’s time.

    Unlike Freedom Express which was promoted by our VJs, My India Report will be done by the freshers and bloggers.

    Channel [V] has been very active in the internet space. What are the plans on that front?
    We have a strong online presence. Lot of our stuff is lined up in YouTube. Lola videos are amongst the most watched videos on YouTube and she has a large fan following on Orkut.

    Channel [V]’s Bai promotion was highly appreciated. All our properties have a vast community on the web. We are very ‘new media friendly’ – and a lot of the new media generation is aware of what we do. In fact, the band that we found for Launch Pad was through Orkut.

    Channel [V] made by you is a huge user generated content phenomena.

    What has the channel lined up on the promo front?
    So far Simpoo, the animated character, has been by far the best promo that we did. People really liked and enjoyed watching it. So we have a new Simpoo KBC promo coming up.

    Our promos always reflect the trends of society. For example, we have a promotion for Get Gorgeous saying Moral Police sue us. It got us eyeballs.

    We will be unveiling many more promos including one based on an upcoming Go Green Campaign on Global Warming.

    Does Channel [V] bank a lot on movie marketing?
    Channel [V] is a popular chosen platform for movie marketing. Rang de Basanti, Bluff Master and Don were some of the exclusive movies that we promoted on Channel [V]. Ram Gopal Verma’s Aag is the next movie we are going to promote. We are still working on it.

  • We are confident of achieving a turnover of Rs 4.5 billion in the digital audio video segment by year end : Moon B Shin- LG managing director

    We are confident of achieving a turnover of Rs 4.5 billion in the digital audio video segment by year end : Moon B Shin- LG managing director

    Electronics major LG Electronics India Ltd (LGIL) recently announced their foray and focus on digital audio video products in Bangalore. LG showcased their latest offerings in the USA – the Super Multi Blue– a product they claim as the world’s first dual high definition player.

    LGIL managing director and LG Group president South West Asia Moon B Shin took on the reins of Indian operations in January 2007. A core member of the LG team, Shin is traveling over 100 countries including the Middle East, Africa and India.

    In an exclusive interview with Indiantelevision.com’s Tarachand Wanvari Shin highlights LG’s plans for India, with a special emphasis on the digital audio video segment.

    Excerpts:

    LGIL has a turnover of Rs 82.5 billion. Considering that the audio-video segment is expected to account for just Rs 4.5 billion, how are you planning to push your presence in this category?
    I know that comparatively this is a small amount, but these are the products that we expect good growth from. In the video category, we are placed number one with 26 per cent market share, Phillips is next with 22 per cent share. In audio we are far behind, we are around 13 per cent I think there number one is Sony and number two is Phillips because our presence at the moment is very small and we set the targets and these are the areas that we have to pickup. We have to beat Sony and Phillips. We have really worked very hard, product planning and selling, marketing for the last couple of years. We have come with really very new range of products.

    Phillips and Sony are strong in the cassette and audio tapes analog space. You don’t seem to have launched any products in that category?
    Today we launched MP3, MP4, the portable DVD player, the car audio system – from the lower end segment to the high-end, we have a really full range. That analog tape market is the rural market and is coming down. Our focus is on digital.

    How do your other products stack up against competition?
    Overall in India the presence is quite sound. In consumer electronics and home appliances we are around 28-29 per cent. For GSM this year we are going to sell around five million sets and we are going to reach minimum revenues of US$ 200million from this stream. AV is around US$ 100million. We expect a total revenue of Rs 95 billion or around US$ 2.2 billion, so the 300 million translates to a little less than 15 per cent of our overall revenues.

    How important is India as a market for LG?
    India accounts for around 6 per cent share of the global revenues. India is tremendously important for LG. By 2010, our target is to increase the India share to 10 per cent of LG’s global revenues. Our top management, they really pay attention to this market. The market conditions are very good and the government is very smart, they maintain an open policy, India is a market driven economy. All these things are very positive for us. The corporate attention on this market is really huge. Maybe even more than China.

    LG has a large amount of visibility as far as mass communications are concerned. What are marketing and advertisement spends?
    Every year for above the line and below the line, we spend around US$ 50 million in India. Last year we invested around US$ 46-48 million, this year we plan US$ 50 million. This figure may change because every month we are growing by 20 – 25 per cent. We are on right track.

    So which segment is driving the growth?
    The flat panel display, GSM, computer monitors, and now AV these are driving our growth. And they are also our future growth engines. Maybe PC’s too.

    What is your market share in PC’s?
    Laptops and desktops is around 6 million, and this will grow fast, so at the moment it is very minimal, around 3 per cent. But, we are coming up with good designs and technology so the PC potential is very good. The market size of laptops is area that we have to focus on.

    Flat panel display, GSM, computer monitors, and now AV are driving our growth

    Do you have lower end laptops also?
    Yes we do, but we are not going to play in the low-end segment. We are going to really play in the top of the line products.

    What are your forecasts for the next year – your growth targets?
    Every year we have to grow by a minimum of 20 per cent. By all means we have to grow by this percentage. By mobilizing the attention from headquarters, from market surveys and through consultants like McKenzie, maybe work together with them if we feel that we cannot meet the targets.

    What is the proportion of the products that you sell here that are made in India?
    Almost 90 per cent. About 10 per cent we import as finished products or complete business units (CBU). The balance 90 per cent we manufacture and export too. Some are CKD, some completely manufactured in India. The local content varies product wise. But it’s between 50-70 per cent.

    Any plans to expand further here in India?
    Not for the next several years no. In Pune we have a large space at Ranjangaon. I would not say that we have idle capacity, we have other buildings-two as a matter of fact, one is full of operations and the second building is 20 per cent operational. So there is space. We have to invest only in the manufacturing facility. The building and everything else is ready. We have to invest only in the machinery, that we will go on within Pune.

    How long have you been in India and what is your experience here?
    I have been here two years. Over this time, I have travelled a lot, to almost every corner of the country, I have pretty much covered the A and B class towns. I was a real frequent flyer, I wanted to see what is taking place in every corner of India and I could observe and find that the potential in India is really good. I think India is the only country that can fight against China. India will definitely be in the forefront as far as economic growth, or the GDP growth is concerned, it will be neck to neck with China in the next 30 years or so. China is growing very fast, but India is also growing as fast. The potential is there and I am going to communicate with the headquarters about this marketplace and how it is important. My outlook for India is very positive.

    Could you speak about the infrastructure in India?
    I was born in a very tiny town in Korea and I have grown up there. Maybe at times the infrastructure was even worse than it is today in India. So I am really accustomed to the poor infrastructure in the rural areas. For me there’s no problem at all.

    What is your opinion about the skill levels, the knowledge quotient of Indians?
    They are good, they are very fast learners. We used to send people to Korea and train them over there and then bring them here. We sent them to our other subsidiaries to benchmark. Their adaptation is excellent. Skill levels are good. I really appreciate them.

    Any R&D work being done in India for the LG group globally?
    Not much. In India we have only around seven people working on design. They have not yet contribute to the designing for LG globally. We have our own design centers all over the world, in Europe, China, in the United States. We have design centers located in every corner of the world to come up with local design and also to supply global designs.
  • “The adoption of multiple frequencies will mark the next inflation point in radio” : Naveen Chandra- Radio Mirchi SVP & National sales head Naveen Chandra

    “The adoption of multiple frequencies will mark the next inflation point in radio” : Naveen Chandra- Radio Mirchi SVP & National sales head Naveen Chandra

    The media industry has recently been eyeing the advantages that radio is promising to offer, but when it comes to the monies, advertisers are still apprehensive to bet big on the medium. As the radio industry in India evolves progressively from mass to niche, the industry is setting its targets to rake in the moolah. However, obstacles are inevitable and the biggest threat is of under valuation in proportion to its reach and accessibility.

    In a free flowing conversation, Radio Mirchi SVP and National sales head Naveen Chandra shares his views on the scope of the medium in India, which he believes will be fuelled following the Government’s sanction of a multiple frequency approach adopted by a single radio operator. He tells Indiantelevision.com’s Renelle Snelleksz that this will mark “the next inflection point in radio.” Geared to take on the big guns of print and television, this radio player has set high standards for itself and demands a premium as it moves into the radio era.

    Excerpts:

    Could you shed some light on Radio Mirchi’s sales and media strategy?
    As a market leader we have been pioneering efforts to look at things very differently. As a medium, radio is very unique because it can be both National and local at the same time. There is no parallel to this, for instance television is national by nature, and although regional television does come close, it is still very fragmented and exits in certain pockets. In terms of a National network, even print does not have editions across the country and is more regionalized. Thus we are a medium that’s does not have limitations of geography, which places us very uniquely to conduct a national or local campaign.

    The second thing about radio is that if you look at Tam data radio lures advertisers from across different product categories. While there are some categories that will use print or niche channels like FMCG, the auto, telecom and banking sectors will not advertise on GEC’s. Radio in this respect is an all encompassing medium as it offers a solution to a wide spectrum of categories that advertise on different genres of print and TV.

    Which are the biggest categories as revenue drivers on Radio Mirchi? How do they stack up percentage wise?
    Banking and finance contribute to 11 -12 per cent, media and entertainment 10 – 11 per cent, telecom 9 per cent, retail and real estate 8 – 10 per cent, automobiles 7 – 8 per cent and durables (which on an annual basis is cyclical).

    Which are the new entrants that are flocking to radio?
    We recently conducted an IPO marketing seminar with merchant bankers to get them to look at the medium positively as it can provide returns due its large reach, which exceeds a Star Plus or Times Of India. Besides radio can also provide a lot of on-ground and BTL brand building activities that attract audiences to consumer the product.

    How do you justify the fact that radio exceeds the reach of Star Plus or TOI?
    If you look at five minutes of continuous viewing on any television channel, you will notice that it is lower than the reach of radio. Using one simple metric – to consume television you need cable connectivity, to consume print you need literacy but to consume radio you nothing but to enjoy good music. Therefore radio by definition, reaches 99 per cent of the population and the reach will always be larger than any other medium.

    What is the current reach for the station nationally?
    Currently, 1.7 crore people tune into Radio Mirchi daily across 10 stations that include the four key metros Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, Chennai, as well as Bangalore, Hyderabad, Ahmedabad, Indore, Jaipur. Stations in Patna, Jalandhar and Goa have recently been added.

    What are your plans to increase your network across the country?
    We are looking to launch another 20 stations across the country within the next six months.

    What’s the revenue growth that Radio Mirchi has seen over this fiscal?
    We have seen good growth over this year, however I will not be able to share exact numbers until our annual report is out.

    But we have marked about 50 – 60 per cent revenue growth on radio.

    What is the current revenue generating model that radio operates on and how does it compare with television and print advertising rates?
    For radio we follow ILT research that helps us to operate on a cost per reach (in thousands) model, so while our rates are high, our cost per thousand is very low. Typically print and TV operate on the on cost per thousand (CPT) approach but at about Rs 1300 – 1400 depending on the channel.

    Our rate is Rs 70 per thousand people, which is very low in comparison to television and print. But as a means of comparison, one ad in print is equivalent to about 30 ads on radio, so in that sense it is much lower.

    The reach of radio exceeds a Star Plus or Times Of India

    What’s the ad growth curve that the station has seen over this year?
    With our focus towards a lot more on corporate driven advertising, if you look at the ad growth we have seen good growth over the last four to five years. Additionally, the ad durations have come down significantly from about 45 seconds to about 15 seconds on an average because the advertising environment has become more promotional led than as branding activities.

    In terms of spot rates, what is the margin between Radio Mirchi rates and your closest competitor?
    In Mumbai, our rate would be Rs 1,800 for 10 seconds, while other stations would range between Rs 400 – 1000 for the same.

    What is the current market size for radio in India?
    It presently stands at about Rs 500 – 600 crores.

    Could you highlight key benefits of radio as a medium?
    Radio is very linear medium, for instance in New York there are 89 radio stations but the average number of stations a person listens to is 1.7, which is under two. Essentially, this indicates a high loyalty towards radio stations as programs are seamless and it’s not like every hour there is different show. The characteristic of radio is such that it is very personal and intense and therefore is consumed as a medium of ‘one,’ it’s a mass as well as a personal medium. While for television, every half hour there is differentiated content which forces the viewer to keep shifting in and out of channels. Similarly, a Friends fan will watch the show on which ever channel it beams, so even if cricket had to shift to something like B4U, then everyone would flock there even if they have never seen the channel before.

    Therefore, for radio the research we conduct points to many unduplicated audiences that are loyal to one station alone. Thus, many unduplicated audiences will continue to be present but will not be reached even if one operator were to buy out a set five to seven stations.

    However, acquisitions will increase your presence across the country, so are you looking to buy out other stations?
    Well, we don’t know that yet. But in a sense the next inflection point in radio will be multiple frequencies.

    With India experiencing a boom in radio, what are the key differentiators for Radio Mirchi in this cluttered environment?
    Our key differentiator would be our programming and jocks which are very contemporary. Through a lot of analysis and research we cater to the needs of listeners. We often tie up with Bollywood to premiere music on our station.

    Radio has a lot of elements that a listener can identify with like for instance a radio jock. Also, every radio station has a particular ‘stationality.’

    In more mature markets, often clients only advertise on stations that are a natural extension of their brand and its values? How far away is India on that evolutionary scale?
    Let me give an example – There was a time when Warner Brothers would advertise on Go 92.5FM because it was English and niche, but today advertisers such as these are seeing the benefits of a mass radio stations as well.

    With television further fragmenting into ‘niche’ specific channel offerings, how long before radio also branches out into the realm of niche stations? Given that Go 92.5 FM grew quickly extinct and resorted to mass appeal, what barriers would radio encounter before it adopts a niche approach?
    Once the Government approves of a multiple frequency model, where a single radio operator will have different frequencies, it is then that radio will experiment and take the route of niche stations. But this will not take shape unless all the radio stations that are scheduled to launch this year roll out there plans.

    What do you see as the way forward for the radio industry in India?
    Currently, radio only occupies two per cent of an advertiser’s ad pie expenditure and that is dispensable. As a medium I feel our rate structure is under priced, the average cost for a radio campaign is about Rs 60, 00,000 across eight to nine markets. The challenge is to increase this by three times.

  • ”Music channels need to differentiate themselves’ : Amit Jain- MTV India managing director

    ”Music channels need to differentiate themselves’ : Amit Jain- MTV India managing director

    Viacom’s channels in India have not had an easy time in the last couple of years. For starters, the music genre has been stagnating in terms of viewership. Nick, which is being given a push now, had also failed to compete with the likes of Turner and Disney.

    The company’s recent focus has been to improve operating margins by removing unproductive costs. It is also looking at its brand solutions business as a way forward.

    Indiantelevision.com’s Ashwin Pinto caught up with MTV India MD Amit Jain to find out more about the company’s growth plans.

    Excerpts:

    MTV globally has positioned itself as a brand solutions provider. What is the strategy to transpose that to India?
    As a backgrounder, we have brands in the music, kids and entertainment space. The challenge is to evolve this into a business model which is viable, profitable and works in the long-term. MTV globally is different from other channels. We don’t believe that we simply air content. We are brands. Our channels stand for a specific brand promise to a specific audience.

    We are not about simply putting a pipe out and putting in content that tests well. We have a whole consumer focus which is investment in consumer insight, investigating tastes and preferences of audiences, their lifestyles. We are then able to take decisions based on insight as opposed to taking a show concept and doing research.

    We looked at whether we could take the attitudes of our listeners which is talent, careers and getting double big results in half the time and use that as an insight into our positioning and channels.

    You have brands, research and most importantly in-house creativity. A typical channel thinks of a show concept and gives it out to a production house.

    We, however, have a deep rooted philosophy where we create our own content. 90 per cent of our content is in-house and this allows us to get more aggressive in our programming. We have only outsourced news from a learning perspective. You have everything from A-Z under one roof. On Nick, while we haven’t done local productions before we now have the confidence to do it ourselves.

    Finally instead of being space sellers our team over a period of time has been very client focussed in terms of offering solutions and client integration. While everybody does it here you have a small repertoire of clients. Our managers sit down and discuss with them. They are invited to meetings.

    Agencies take us for client meetings. We are invited to talk about youth branding. We are in a position to understand consumers and clients requirements when we create solutions in-house. We are not a middleman who puts things together and gives it somebody else.

    We use our VJs, events, international properties to create solutions. We are in a position to create value for clients that goes beyond plain vanilla advertising.

    In this manner, we are feeding of our own competence. Viacom Brand Solutions is a premium service for select clients. We are not going out there and making pitches. We work with clients who seek us out and want to do innovations. Our top 10 clients want to work with us in a more effective manner.

    When was the service launched and who are the clients?
    We launched it in January. We have a roster of over five clients. We have worked with Cadbury’s, Unilever, Nokia. The most interesting one was what we did for xBox.

    xBox invited us to popularise the concept of gaming. With MTV we did a short film. It was featured on MSN’s desktop ads. VH1 created modified videos which had gaming characters. Nick had Jimmy Neutron making gaming simple for children. We extended this to the web and now we are looking at other applications. Nokia wanted to position a phone brand strongly in the music space. We tied up with a band pentagram and they gave us the music score. We invited user generated content and a video was to be created. We were stunned at the sheer creativity of untrained minds. The rub off that VHI and Nokia got through the advertising, on the website was good. VH1 did a creative job of making the first user generated music video in the country. Any of around 50-60 entries could have been used.

    Cadbury’s was very different. They wanted to do an innovation around Bytes. It launched with a new package and on purchase of the package it gave the consumer an opportunity to download an MTV ringtone.

    It brings together our expertise in partnerships in the mobile space, our creative expertise. We got seven mobile operators for this deal and around 85-90 per cent of the country’s mobile users were covered by the promotion. Cadbury’s also asked us to work with agency and create a commercial spot. This is an A-Z solution. The technical delivery across different platforms was very good. We had some operators calling up and complaining that the download of the ring tone was not working.

    Our guys were scrambling in places like Madhya Pradesh where the ringtone was not activated on Idea Cellular. There were tense moments but when it came together it rocked. Most recently we worked with HLL. This was Lux Body Wash. They worked with our team to create music videos. They wanted to own the space of dancing, music. We created a music video for them based on their brand positioning. The music video is called Friday Night Fever. The song was written in-house and produced within our own studios. They have asked to make one more video and this time around we are working with an internationally famous VJ. We have international scriptwriters. While it is early days if clients are saying that they want to do more, it is a pretty good report card. We have three more upcoming projects.

    So a recent media report that says that MTV is looking to outsource ad sales is rubbish?
    Yes! You could not have summarised it better. I don’t know where that came from. It doesn’t make logical sense. The beauty of the Brand Solutions division is that we are not in conflict with anyone. The client and media agency welcome us. We are in a joint venture with the creative agency. It is a truly collaborative effort and we are not substituting anyone at anytime. Brand managers constantly look at ways to activate consumers in a unique way. There aren’t too many options of activating consumers in a relevant manner. We offer solutions to address youth and kids. The solution will never be mass market though.

     

    MTV globally is in restructuring mode. Is this impacting India in any way?
    We now report directly to MTV international. Earlier we reported to London. Bob Bakish who is the head of MTV International is my boss. There is better focus and we get a lot of support from MTV International. For a lot of our brand solutions we are getting excellent help from our global digital team. There is a lot of sharing of experience.

     

    Could you talk about the new team that has been put in place?
    This is my favourite topic. The big challenge is that while we have always had a creative team, how do you convert it into a business? We have put in place a completely empowered matrix structure. There are three general managers. They are Ashish, Keertan and Nina. Then you have functional experts – head of ad sales, distribution. The general manager and functional expert jointly run the channel. This is the innovation that we have brought in. I do not make too many decisions.

    I set the policy and hire people. My job is to drive the culture and set a course for the future direction. I look at the vision three months to a year. We are a collaborative organisation. I run a skip level lunch for those who have been with the company for a couple of months. There are no bosses and no hierarchy. Everybody for a secretary to a general manager attends the lunch. We have freewheeling dialogue about how the experience has been. We are a young organisation. All our general managers are in their mid-30s. Sanjeev Hiremath and myself are the only 40 plus grey hairs in this organisation.

    One of MTV’s key goals globally is to increase operating margins. What is the gameplan in this regard in India?
    It is simple. Identify unproductive costs and convert them into productive costs. Drive the yields. We used to outsource 40 per cent of production, editing and post production work. We have invested in an integrated production and editing facility. The easiest thing that I see people do is outsource jobs that they do not want to do. That is not what we are doing. We are among the most cost effective content producers in the country today. We also cut costs. Last year the entire leadership team including myself did not stay in a five star hotel or fly business class. While these measures will not affect the bottomline, they are symbols of the importance of belt tightening.

    We took out overheads and invested them back into the business. We focussed on remunerative clients. We were not afraid of letting clients go who were not paying us a remunerative rate. We improved our client mix in a challenging year. We brought down our inventory by 30 per cent as we wanted to clean the environment. We took down our inventory and took up our use. We now have a strong revenue line on the back of less inventory, We are looking at a high double digit revenue growth.

    Tam data indicates that ratings for music channels are falling. What is the way forward for MTV?
    This is the most important question. The genre has been stagnating for quite a while. So what do you do about it? There is a lot of fragmentation happening in this genre. Last year four more music channels launched. We have held on to our share. Now you have 16 music channels. Typically the leader gets affected. We have however managed to avoid that.

    In difficult times Ashish and his team have done a creditable job in keeping up in the midst of competitive pressures. After eight years what generally happens is that new entrants take bites out of the leader. It is never number three or four that is hit. We however have not been hit despite being the leader. We are sitting on 34 per cent of viewership.

    A few things need to happen. From an industry point of view music channels need to differentiate themselves. This is critical. Being the leader, we have to show the way. Consumers listen to Bollywood music. You cannot be presumptuous and tell them to listen to other stuff like ghazals instead of Bollywood music. Led by consumer insight, we found that for youngsters getting up in the mornings is the most dreary part of the day. Getting a lift is very important.

    So we launched MTV Kickass Mornings. It starts with a high energy promotion with two ninjas. We have hits, humour, horoscopes and health. Most content here is audio driven. For instance health tips like how to cut down on spicy food, how much water to drink are spoken. Whatever you are doing, you will not miss out.

    Music channels get 30 second, 60 second clips as an entry point. As they do not have to pay, they are happy to play them. We are investing in content though. We are doing full length music videos. Thanks to our relationship with music labels we normally get a first look. The entire Kickass Mornings is about new music. From 100 videos a maximum of 30 are chosen. We are offering a newer and richer music experience than anybody else. And we are packaging the whole proposition. MTV helps your day get brighter and better. This is our message.

    We also recently started Soundcheck. As a leader we want to take a call and put our reputation on the line by saying what works and what does not. It is a music ratings service. There are speakers that determine the rating. Music experts are helping us make these choices as to what is emerging music as opposed to what is selling. We are not afraid to take on big names saying that their music is absolute rubbish. Some popular videos have been thrashed by us.

      http://www.indiantelevision.com/sites/drupal7.indiantelevision.co.in/files/styles/large/public/Amit%20copy.jpg?itok=e0oJYruk

    How important is MTV’s reality portfolio in the programming mix and is it mostly males tuning for this?
    Research shows that youth are tiring of fiction. They genuinely see soaps as there is no alternative. If they are given quality programming in their space they will switch despite the presence of single TV homes. Last year we took a punt on ramping up Roadies. There was an 18 city audition and covered 3600 km from Kerala to Kashmir down to Sikkhim. It was niot stage managed. We did not handpick good looking faces.

    There were kids selected by the sheer dint of their talent. We had a fantastic partnership with Hero Honda. Their ability to manage large selection was invaluable. The show had a rating of 1.9 in the metros which is really good for a special interest channel. The Roadies finale got a rating of six. Reality among the urban youth is a conceopt that will work really well.

    How would you describe your relationships with the Indian music labels and film producers who always want more in terms of license fees?
    We have a win-win relationship with them. A lot of labels look at us as an extension of them. That is because we are careful about partners. We see ourselves as a marketing arm. If you look at the likes of Yash Raj Films most of them give us a first look.

    We premiered the making of Tara Rum Pum on MTV. If it is in the youth space, film producers give us a first look. We are not victims of hard bargaining. They see the value we deliver in marketing to the right audiences. We do not have the buyer seller relationship. It is a genuine partnership.

    Could you talk about how taking up social causes like Aids has helped boost MTV’s brand image and perception?
    In terms of perception it come down to whether it is fun and frolic or does MTV have a larger meaning. It adds a reason for our existence. We are now going into an additional initiative and we are taking up the cause of illegal human trafficking on an international level across borders. We are looking to build awareness around that.

    The Indian government recently banned FTV and earlier AXN on the grounds of obscene content. What steps has MTV taken to ensure that its music videos and shows do not offend anyone?
    I must admit that early last year we faced this challenge. We got a notice. Our response was to fly down and apologise. We promised that it would not happen. We later told them why it would not happen.

    The entire MTV team showed them a new system that has been put in place. Since that incident the Ministry has complimented us for the work that we have done.

    I would appreciate your views on the proposed content code.
    This should be formulated by dialogue involving all parties. Accountability should not rest with one party. Besides the broadcaster the content cerator should also be held accountable.

    Could you elaborate on Nick’s strategy to challenge Turner and Disney?
    I am a believer in doing the basics and not trying to do too many things at one time. We will not take on Disney in the South. We have to be a serious player among the first two to three channels in the Hindi Speaking Markets. Now we are not yet there. But six months back we were the number seven market player. Now we are going to be number four.

    In six months the stickiness on Nick has doubled. The time spent has moved form the 50’s to the 90’s. Distribution, time spent, promos are in place. Now we are focussing on marketing and brand building. In the last four months a strong brand building promos are in place. They are not multi crore promos. We did a Bakra Pakdi initiative and got 80,000 entries.

    Nick has appropriate and safe content. We take our responsibility as a broadcaster seriously. We avoid violence. We are the safest babysitter available. If a mother is to leave her child in front of the television it would most likely be Nick. I can say that with confidence. We like to be the best destination for comedy. So Nick is about fun, smiles and seen from a child’s point of view. I would be surprised if we are not number three by the end of the year.

    Has the deal for ad sales with NDTV worked?
    Well our MTV and VHI teams have fared so well people wondered what we were doing. Here is where I come from. When you grow a business you need a portfolio approach. You have to make choices.

    Strategy is about what to do and what not to do. That is what I tell my team. You cannot do a little bit here, a little bit there and hope to succeed. Last year people were shocked that nick did not invest in marketing. We were focussed on building up content.

    Now in the priorities of Nick do we want to make a multi crore investment in a sales team or do we want to put the same money into brand building? We have chosen to do the latter. The deal with NDTV allows us access to several hundred clients for a share of revenue. We have limited resources and we decided to build the brand and let an expert handle client management.

    How is VH1 faring?
    It is a uniquely different brand in the Western music and lifestyle space. There is no brand close to it in this space. BH1 is delivering the highest quality audience in the country. While it may be small it delivers the highest incidence of car, refrigerator, mobile owners etc. We target a high propensity to consume buyers. Clients get no wastage. Its wastage factor is the lowest in the industry.

     

    On the distribution front what progress has been made to boost the reach of the channels across Asia?
    When we launched in Pakistan late last year people were sceptical. But if you look at it over the last three years with the growth in the Pakistan economy siome disposable income has come into the hands of the youth.

    Economic growth leads to a more Westernised consumption culture. Over the last three to four years the McDonalds, KFCs, Pepsis, Cokes and mobile operators have opened the doors of consumer culture. Their economy is growing as fast as ours. This has formed a middle class.

    The television industry in Pakistan is ad driven. If you do not have consumption expenditure among a large audience you cannot have an ad sales proposition. MTV was also waiting to have enough content to have a sustainable 24 hour channel. Their music video content is as good as ours. Sometimes it is better. We have Indus Television as our partner. We did research about the brand MTV. Will it be rejected? Are there going to be any negative connotations by some elements of society?

    The consequences have been positive. We trained the Pakistan team in terms of promotions, packaging.

    Then we launched Nick in Pakistan with Ary. It launched this year in English. Our markets are all licensing deals except for Pakistan which is ad driven. The tourism economy has helped us grow in the Maldives. A lot of our revenue comes from the resorts there.

    With India going through digitisation with Cas and DTH the time seems ripe to bring in more channels. Are there any plans in this regard?
    We are waiting for the digital platforms to consolidate. Let DTH reach four million homes and then we will examine options. Comedy Central is one channel I would look at bringing in. Spike TV is a channel for men is another as it is a clear differentiator. There is a correct time to do things.

    VH1 launched at the right time. I come back to the point about what I tell my team – strategy is not only about what to do. It is also about what not to do. In hindsight one can say that Nick should not have been launched so many years ago. If the management team at that time was not going to invest in it then the launch should have happened later. It is now that we are investing in it and giving it a clear direction and goals that it is moving towards.

  • ‘We have enough high quality relevant content to provide for each of the three channels’ : RC Venkateishi- ESPN Software India managing director

    ‘We have enough high quality relevant content to provide for each of the three channels’ : RC Venkateishi- ESPN Software India managing director

    Just when everyone was thinking that sports broadcasters might look to “de-risk” the cricket story, ESPN Star Sports has announced the launch of a dedicated cricket channel for Indian audiences. The new channel, christened Star Cricket, will commence transmission in June.

     

    Star Cricket will be making its bow with a big bang property to showcase because its launch coincides with the India tour of England that involves four Tests and seven One Day Internationals.

     

    Indiantelevision.com caught up with ESPN Software India managing director RC Venkateish in an attempt to get a feel of what was guiding this decision.

     

    Excerpts:

    Is this the right time to launch another cricket centric sports channel, particularly considering the disillusionment of the general public with the game in the country?
    Suffice to say that there is still no challenge to cricket as the single sport which has pole position in the Indian market. And I don’t see that changing anytime in the near future. So, from the perspective of timing, we really don’t think that is an issue.

     

    What is more important is the longer term picture and going forward we continue to believe that cricket will continue to hold its own and in fact strengthen as there is a lot of new talent coming in.

    Nobody’s is arguing that India will not continue to remain cricket-centric. But the fact of the matter is that for something like this to work, it has to be underpinned by high levels of interest in the domestic game as well, which is not the case in India. In fact, this is a problem that Neo Sports seems to be confronting as well.
    Which is a pity actually. In fact, if the local tournaments are properly marketed and properly packaged for the viewers, have the potential. We unfortunately don’t have the rights for that.

    Exactly, and isn’t that what Nimbus is hoping to leverage on Neo Sports. And you don’t have local Indian cricket to showcase, so what is the USP of your channel?
    What we will be showcasing in fact, apart from the international matches, is county cricket in England and domestic cricket in Australia, which also feature some of the best players in the world, including a lot of Indian players. There will also be a substantial effort to market that.

     

    In many ways we will be doing a parallel to things like English Premier League. Where it was four or five years ago to where it is today, it is really a result of the investments that we have done in promoting that property and making it interesting for the viewer.

     

    If you just pick up something and put it on the channel, it is not going to work. That is the job of marketing to popularize a particular sport. It has to be exploited and executed properly. Even the domestic Indian tournament, it needs to be put across properly to the viewer. It is not something that will happen automatically.

    There are two strands to the communication that you sent out on your upcoming channel. One is that you will showcase live India and non India cricket. You will also showcase feature programming, including reality reality shows?
    Reality shows are like we had recently Harsha ki Khoj Dream Job. That genre has lot of space. It has a lot of opportunities for us to create programming around that. We will be developing more such shows and putting them across to the viewer.

    Fair enough but the point is that now you have three platforms through which you have to transmute content. Is there enough content to go around?
    On the content side, over the last couple of years, we strengthened our cache, not just in cricket but in all other sports. We just recently renewed the English Premier League. We have the Spanish League, we have Euro 2008. Those are the big soccer properties. In tennis, we added the French Open so we now have it along with Wimbledon and the Australian. In motor sports we have Formula 1 and A1. In golf we have all the major properties.

     

    So, if you look at each and every sport and the key properties, they are all residing on our channel. Along with this, we have other smaller content also which has come on the network.

     

    As for cricket, for the next 14-16 months I have India’s tour of England, the Twenty20 World Cup, India’s tour of Australia, the Asia Cup and the Champion’s Trophy. That is five major cricketing events.

     

    So I don’t believe that we are in anyway falling short of providing high quality relevant content in each of these three channels.

    What about distribution? Right now we are in a very uncertain distribution market, both on analog as well as on digital cable, with Cas only in the beginnings of being rolled out. And in such a time you are launching a 3rd channel?
    I agree with you that there are a lot of people having trouble finding distribution. But ultimately, your bottom line is going to be content. I think we will be in a position to demonstrate it through cable and to the viewer that the content we have to showcase on the channel are of a quality that must be carried.

    Let us accept that you have great content, but today the reality of placement fees cannot be wished away. And it means that slots are booked on tunable bandwidths for one year, two years…
    I think that applies more to other genres. Unless people see your channel how will they get hooked on to it? They will not demand it. For my cricket channel, I don’t have to create a demand.

    There is the recent example of Neo Sports, which had great content but still faced distribution problems?
    The difference is that Neo Sports did not have its own distribution team.

    Well they had Star distributing them, which is as good as it can get?
    I don’t know what Neo Sports needed to do but they didn’t do, or what support they got, I don’t really want to comment on that. But as far as we’re concerned, we have the strongest distribution as well as distribution team in India, and I am completely confident that we will not have any issues with our channel.

    We have been delivering higher and higher reach and we haven’t seen the proper monies for that as yet

    That still doesn’t explain how you’re going to find place in a tunable bandwidth if all the slots are already locked in.
    In case there is a cricket match happening, he (the cable operator has to put it in the prime band. I can’t see a situation where the matches will not be shown.

    There is the option of DD, where the matches are being shown because of must carry.
    Test matches are not going to be shown on DD. I agree with you that channels tend to go up and down, especially the ones who don’t pay money to the cable operator. That is a fact.

     

    Even then, we have always managed to be there in prime band even when we didn’t have cricket running. And you must understand that in regards to sports channels there has been a certain amount of consolidation. So the other channels which don’t have relevant content tend to be pushed onto the hyper band.

     

    There will be a little bit of juggling and we will have to manage that. But as a company policy, we will certainly not pay any carriage fee or any placement fee. We are a pay channel and we will get our price.

    What rates have you fixed for the new channel?
    We haven’t announced the final rate but it should be in the region of around Rs 28 to RS 30.

    Let’s talk about the ICC cricket rights. I take you back to a comment you’d made earlier to Indiantelevision.com that the crazy escalation in rights prices will start cooling down a bit. And yet you went and plonked $ 1.1 billion for those rights?
    If you do a bit of math, you’ll see that whatever I said earlier has actually happened. Let’s benchmark it with some of the other rights. The BCCI rights, which the previous version was for $ 50 million for five years, went for $ 612 million for four years. So that’s basically an escalation of 1,400 per cent.

     

    Now take the ICC, the last ICC went for $ 550 million. So that’s basically a 100 per cent increase. And the last ICC did not have events like the Twenty20 World Cup, which have been added on this property.

     

    What we have paid over eight years, is basically a 9 per cent per annum escalation in rights fee, as opposed to some of the other properties, which in recent times have gone absolutely berserk. The BCCI, as well as the BCCI offshore cricket rights package sold to Zee for over $ 215 million ($ 219.15 million).

     

    Even if you look at things like the Sri Lanka board for $ 50 million, or the Bangladesh board, which went for $ 56 million after going for $ 6-7-8 million last time.

     

    So what we have paid for are not just the World Cups and Champions Trophies, but also what is going to develop into a real cracker of a property – the Twenty20 World Cup. Not once, but thrice.

    From an average per day cost perspective, and if we compare the three properties that went for big bucks, how does such a payout work?
    Zee paid $ 8.71 million, BCCI went for around $ 3-4 million per day and we are around the same ball park.

    There are also the cricket rights that are coming up over the next 12 months for many big territories over the next year and a half. You have already committed $ 1.1 billion for the ICC rights as well as all the other rights you’ve mopped up recently, so where do you stand on that?
    We are quite comfortable with the levels of investment we’ve made thus far and what we have identified as key acquisitions for the future.

     

    But having the ICC rights provides us a very strong backbone of cricket over the next eight years. Whatever else we add on would be accretive to what we already have so it won’t be necessary to go out and buy everything under the sun.

    What of the territories that ESS currently own – England, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa? Will you be making aggressive bids to retain them?
    We haven’t formalised how we’re going to go about it yet.

    I again come back to the disaster that was the World Cup. Everyone was expecting 2007 to be cricket’s year as far as advertising is concerned due to the sheer volumes of A list properties that are coming up throughout the year. Now will all the calculations have to be reworked?
    On this I have a different take. I think the advertisers have had it pretty good so far. I have an argument we need to push more forcefully and that is something as a broadcasting community we haven’t done enough of. The fact of the matter is all the rates that advertisers have been paying us have been on the basis of CPRP at a time when overall reach has doubled.

    But this is an argument that Star’s Paritosh Joshi has raised, as too Zee’s Joy Chakraborty. Today we are faced with a situation where HLL has pulled out its advertising from Star. And the broadcasting community does not seem to have any unity on this issue so what are we talking here?
    There is unity developing on this issue and you will see a more forceful exposition of the point in the days to come. Certainly at IBF we are all seized of it in terms of a consolidation of our position.

    We have been delivering higher and higher reach and we haven’t seen the proper monies for that as yet.

    Coming back to the development of local sport, you’ve earlier stated that Sports federations need to get their act together. One of the biggest culprits in that sense is the IHF run by KPS Gill with whom you’re a partner. One could say that it is because of the mess the IHF is in that the PHL is not taking off. So doesn’t it make sense to encourage the IHF to get itself sorted out?
    Our experience with the PHL has been very positive. There wasn’t anything in PHL that we needed to do and have not been able to do because of lack of support from IHF. Suffice to say that we are quite happy, both with the way the PHL has performed and with the kind of partnership we have with the IHF.

    But you yourself have said one reason why PHL is not taking of is because they are not performing well internationally. I think it is interlinked. If the federation was being run properly, the teams would be doing better internationally. A follows B, one could argue.
    How federations are run is not something I would like to comment on. We stand ready to help the federation in any way we can but it is not our brief to tell the associations how they are to be run. Because, quite frankly, this is something they need to work out among themselves.

  • ‘Our aim is to come up with total telecom solutions’ : Rajiv Agarwal – Essar Telecom Retail

    ‘Our aim is to come up with total telecom solutions’ : Rajiv Agarwal – Essar Telecom Retail

    The mobile retailing space is hotting up in India. Essar Telecom Retail, an Essar group company has entered mobile retailing in India with the launch of its “The MobileStore” outlets across the country. The basic aim is to be a complete telecom solutions provider.

     

    It has tied up with global media firm Virgin to provide the backend solutions like customer care. This marks Virgin’s entry into India’s burgeoning mobile sector. Virgin founder Richard Branson believes that this is an opportunity for the two parties to fundamentally change the face of mobile retailing in India.

     

    Indiantelevision.com caught up with Essar Telecom Retail CEO Rajiv Agarwal for a quick chat on the plans.

     

    Excerpts:

    Could you give me an overview of Essar’s mobile retailing initiative?
    This is a chain of retail stores that will serve as one stop shop for the needs of the mobile consumer. We are looking to fill a void that is present in the retail market. Today we have international players on the operators side, on the manufacturers side. But on the retail side we do not have an organised player. The customer is the most important element as all these people are working for him/her.

    As the number of mobile subscribers, users becomes more and more the market is becoming more complicated, which has created a void. Our aim is to come up with total telecom solutions for the customer.

    What are the different products and services being offered?
    One can buy cell phones, get repair services, do bill collection. We also have value added services like ringtones. We have media services like games, DTH connections, ipods, cameras. All are fast moving.

    What is the synergy that the group has in setting up telecom retail?
    Essar has decided to be in retailing in all their core businesses. We have been in telecom over the last 12 years. Our aim is to get closer to the customer. We have knowledge and awareness about telecom.

    As per research, what does the mobile user expect from a mobile retail chain and how is Essar going about fulfilling his/her needs?
    The mobile customer is looking for a range of products that he can touch and feel. He/she wants a store that is next to his house. He wants value for money, after sales service.

    Why did you decide against going the franchise route for your stores?
    There would have been the risk of our brand value being diluted. Also you have to manage many entrepreneurs if you walk down that road. This is a business where you cannot allow your service proposition to get diluted.

    The franchise route would have meant that there would have been no difference between us and any other mobile store.

    We have media services like games, DTH connections, ipods, cameras. All are fast moving

    Given that Indians are an extremely price sensitive won’t it be difficult for mobile retail to make a margin and have sustained revenue?
    That is the case for any product. We have developed our business model keeping this in mind.

    What is the investment being made and how many stores are being set up?
    In the next three years we are setting up 2,500 stores at an investment of Rs 1,250 crores (Rs 12.5 billion) across 600 cities.

    Over 70 stores have already been launched in places like Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, Hyderabad. In the next six to eight weeks we will have opened up another 100 stores. In the next six months we would be operating 700 stores.

    The stores are in three formats – large (1,000-1,500 sq ft), medium (800-1,000 sq ft) and compact (200-500 sq ft). The ratio being identified is 20:60:20 across large, medium and compact stores respectively.

    We are looking at a breakeven of three years for the business. The stores will cost between Rs 500,000 – Rs 5 million each to set up.

    What are the factors looked at to select each location?
    You look at places where customer footfalls are high. This could be in a mall or on a busy street. We will have the shop in shop concept to a certain extent going forward. Around 15-20 per cent of the stores will be in Metros.

    In terms of revenue how much comes in from where and who are the companies you have tie-ups with?
    Handsets contribute to 75 per cent of our revenues. We have tie-ups with all the major manufacturers like Nokia, Motorola, Sony. Mobile repairs are our core area. We have trained people in our stores who can look after the problem. We have straight tie-ups with the manufacturers and operators.

    We have a tie-up with Mauj Telecom for mobile games. For DTH there is Tata Sky, Dish TV. There are also opportunities for in-store advertising and merchandising.

    Could you talk about the back end solutions that have been put in place?
    We have a tie-up with Virgin. They bring retail knowledge in terms of softer skills in terms of customer relationship management. The deal is for brand licensing, technical and consultancy services.
    Virgin will provide their expertise in the areas of branding, marketing, customer care, store operations and staff training.

    We chose Virgin as that brand stands for good quality, brilliant customer service, innovation, fun and good value.

    Finally what marketing activities are being done to create awareness?
    We are airing ads during the broadcast of the cricket World Cup. A large portion of mobile users will be watching the event. We will also be doing a lot of print and outdoor activities.

  • ‘CNN is an American-owned news channel, but we are not America-centric’ : Rena Golden – CNN International senior vice president

    ‘CNN is an American-owned news channel, but we are not America-centric’ : Rena Golden – CNN International senior vice president

    A little girl from a small town in Bihar who migrated from India to the US when she was just six years old, Rena Golden is today at the very top rung of the hierarchy at global news major CNN International. As senior vice president, she visited India this week to announce the latest edition of “Eye on India”, focussed this time on the youth power of the country.

    Credited by her colleagues with amazing skills, journalistic and managerial, driving the world’s largest news broadcasting company CNN from just an all-American channel (“I joined 21 years ago when people used to call CNN Chicken Noodle News!”), to an international one reaching 2 billion viewers across 200 countries, she still retains a disarming level of simplicity.

    It is perhaps natural that an American of Indian origin would also be the head of CNN’s Diversity Committee, ensuring that community parity is maintained not just within the organisation but also in the dissemination of news.

    Golden, who studied in two universities in North Carolina, graduating in English with Honours (“My father wanted me to be a doctor, but I wanted to study English”) and started working with CNN from 1985, spoke to Indiantelevision.com’s Sujit Chakraborty on the present status and future plans of CNN.

    Excerpts:

    You have a large hand in shaping the strategic direction of CNN. What is the most significant area you are looking into at the moment?
    I think it is expansion of news beyond the television sphere. We are on the Internet, mobile phones… I think what CNN is interested in becoming is your news source, on whatever platform it may be… your phone, your Blackberry… We want to become your news information source and travel with you, wherever you are.

    CNN’s news website is a tremendous success which attracts a billion users every year. And CNN International has just launched its news service on mobile phone. We are also looking at video on demand and IPTV… we want to be platform agnostic.

    How is IPTV doing in America… there is content available on that platform here in India as well, but the problem is we do not have downloading technology or bandwidth?
    I think even now in the US market the bandwidth is still not there, but the market is growing in South Korea, in Hong Kong and in some of the Nordic countries in Europe, where we can stream the CNN news channel completely on mobile phones. We are still not there on that platform in the US, but I think the important thing is to have your foot in all the areas. CNN is known for that and one of the areas we are looking at is (improving) technology in news gathering.

    That is my second question, in fact. You also deal with the technology of news gathering?
    Yes, for instance, earlier, when we would go for coverage, say in India or the war in Iraq, we would have to travel with 30 suitcases of equipment. Now, thanks to CNN working with Sony, with Panasonic, and other organisations, we have cameras that fit in a suitcase, which you can take as your carry-on luggage.

    When we went to North Korea, we could move in easily and cover news in a much easier manner, which is often cheaper.

    What are the latest innovations and what are the next technological frontiers in news gathering and dissemination?
    Things are getting smaller and smaller… we are looking at shooting footage on a mobile phone. Only last week, we used a Nokia mobile phone and went “live” on CNN. You don’t have to book satellite space. You can just dial into the CNN offices in Hong Kong or Atlanta, and stream news live, so technology is getting smaller and mobile.

    CNN has more than once made public its ambitions to go regional and local. But at least in the context of the Indian subcontinent it has not happened. And now with the explosion in television news in the country, it looks like it never will. I can see your CNNj in Japan, then Turkish and Korean CNN, so why not in India?
    OK, what we have done in India goes beyond what we have done in some of the other regions. We have partnered with IBN and additionally, we have CNN International which covers India not just for Indians but for the rest of the world. Our partnership with CNN-IBN is less than a year old but it has emerged as the number one news channel in this country. That partnership is as strong as what we have in some other regions, say in Turkey where we have tied up with a media channel that broadcasts CNN in Turkish.

    I think there are different models for different markets and the model that we have for the Indian market… Wow! I mean we couldn’t have imagined this. There could be a partnership with some Hindi channel… I am not ruling that out, but what we need is as strong a partner as we have in CNN-IBN.

    We do not have anything to announce here (in terms of a regional channel) so far. We believe in having local partners and we would not do that in India and open a Hindi channel for instance, without a strong local partner. Local partners understand the country much better… So what you see, this partnership with CNN-IBN, is one of our proudest achievements.

    Chris Cramer had told us last year that BBC has a certain Mark Tully factor advantage in India. For the first time though, now both CNN and BBC can be said to running neck-and-neck. It’s been a long while coming but don’t you think it has come too late in the day because of the way Indian news channels have captured virtually all the mind space?
    Sixty years… not just Mark Tully… I think it is a huge association.

    I think also right from the days when we were ruled by the British there was some association, so what do you feel you are looking at here to change that?
    This is the only market where BBC leads the CNN. I think you just put your finger on that. India has a long historic association with Britain and BBC, especially BBC radio, which was here decades before CNN even came to the market. I respect the BBC, no doubt about that.

    But where CNN excels is in breaking news… that’s our DNA, the DNA of CNN-IBN. We also don’t have a British style of presentation, a British view of the world. We have journalists from 50 different nationalities covering news for us. Don’t get me wrong, I have a lot of respect for BBC, but I think CNN has very successfully differentiated itself.

    Unlike a few years ago, when even a major train accident here would not be covered on BBC or CNN, there is a lot of India on these channels now. But I also feel that there are documentaries that need to be made on India. What are the kinds of documentaries you think CNN ought to do on India in the near future? Do you have a kind of road map for that?
    I am glad you brought up that question. CNN has a documentary division, and one recent documentary was on Britain’s Muslim population. We also have a couple of them from Iraq and from Africa, etc. We are also doing documentaries with foreign filmmakers. We have partnered with a filmmaker from Sierra Leon who has done five or six films on the major issues of Africa. That gives us the opportunity to get into some of the under-reported stories of the world. So we are looking at filmmakers to partner with for making documentaries.

    But having said that, the important thing to remember is that we are not a documentary organisation, not a documentary channel. Our first and foremost work is 24-hour news. We believe in context, not only what’s happened but why it has happened.

    Everyone knows now India is changing, especially in the economic and knowledge sectors. What are the specific areas of change that excite you the most and why?
    I think it is the influence that Indians are now having in the diaspora… and not just the diaspora, because many Indians are also coming back home. India’s influence outside India is a story that really excites me.

    In the US, Indians are doing a lot of things. There are Indians heading technology companies, there are a couple of Indian filmmakers in Hollywood, and of course there are those in medicine and engineering. But one area where Indians are not there in the US is politics, which I think is important for us.

    The other thing, which is the topic of this edition of Eye on India, is the Indian youth. There is no other country in the world where 50 per cent of the population in under the age of 25.

    In the early days of the Iraq war, the media was not as critical as it should have been and a lot of American society regrets that

    Looking at the global picture, is there a region-wise break-up of how it all reports back to Atlanta? How does it work?
    Well, we have an Asian production hub in Hong Kong and a hub in Europe and the headquarters is in Atlanta, but we as an organisation are very decentralised. In India, we have 15 people in the bureau, but we cover India primarily by people who have been journalists in India. It is not just Atlanta dictating what stories are to be done, it’s journalists here saying that ‘these are the stories on the front pages of the newspapers today. We think these are the stories that need to be told about India’. It is people who are working in this country, living, breathing India that drives our India coverage (and likewise, across the globe). That is what makes CNN so unique.

    And speaking of regions, can you offer how revenues stack up in percentage terms?
    Our revenue increase over last year is 22 per cent. Which is very good, very, very strong growth.

    A lot has changed in the last 5-7 years. A global news perspective is not solely in the hands of the likes of the CNN and BBC anymore. The impact of Al Jazeera has been well documented. Now the French have also launched their own global news channel. How is CNN changing to meet the challenges of a world view that is no more ruled from a western Anglo-Saxon perspective?
    Let me put this clearly. CNN International is American owned, and we are proud of our American ownership, but CNN International is not America-centric. It would be crazy for us to be broadcasting internationally but from an American perspective. From the business point of view, that would be ridiculous.

    But I think competition always makes us stronger, because competition means we have to be always ahead. We welcome competition. We have been there for 25 years and there is vast acceptance, because CNN’s journalism is top notch. And we feel there is enough room for others as well.

    And we have been talking about ethics and so forth, so what are the checks and balances that are in place to make sure that stories are fair and accurate?
    First of all, we have the standard-practice guidebook, which, of course, all news organisations have, which all CNN journalists have to abide by. Obviously, the journalist reporting knows the story best, but that story is vetted by many people. Along the way there are many different people who touch that story and fact-check it before it actually goes on air. We are much more interested in getting a story right than getting it ‘first’. We are the Breaking News leader, but we would not be that if our objectivity failed.

    Yes, but say you hire me from India and I, for that matter no one, can be totally objective… maybe I am slightly with the BJP or the Congress or whatever, so a tinge of bias creeps in. So how do you correct that? At the desk level?
    Yes, there is always the issue of being subjective, but there are things like hard facts that cannot be changed. That is why we lay so much emphasis on attribution. If you watch the news channel you will sometimes find that one person has been quoted but the other one has not been… this happens sometimes even if the journalist wants to be objective. It’s in their DNA, but it happens, so we tell them, ‘Hey, that guy’s quotes are not there, so go get it’.

    There have been occasions when a story has been held back for a week to make sure that all the players have got the chance to comment. I can’t tell you how much CNN lives and dies by its credibility factor.

    We’ll pick up on a touchy issue, with American media in particular – “embedded” journalism. Isn’t the way the whole Iraq story has developed a severe indictment on the way the media reported on it from the very beginning? What’s the point of the truth coming out now, when all that is left is death and destruction?
    Well, I think the media had not been as critical as it should have been in the early days (of the Iraq war). Not only the media, there are many politicians and different segments of American society that regrets not having been more critical (at the outset). I think that a lot has changed.

    Because and after the massive Iraq fiasco?
    Because of the war in Iraq and other reasons, because of the political season in general, but I do think that a lot of that has changed. I do think the media has got a lot proper.

    Veering off from your day job, as it were, you are on the advisory board of the Atlanta Woman magazine. Tell us something about the magazine and your area of interest in this.
    I am no longer on the board, but this is a local magazine from Atlanta focussing on the businesswomen. I think as a person involved with international news, I am always interested in what’s happening outside my world. And as a mother, as a wife and as a citizen of Atlanta, Georgia, I also have my responsibility of giving something back to my community.

    As the head of the CNN committee on diversity, what are the crucial diversity issues you face and how do you resolve them?
    The diversity issue we face overall is to maintain the diversity of coverage, to be sensitive to diverse cultures. With American, Latin American, African, or Indian people, all working together in the newsroom, it can be tremendously exciting but there is a lot of opportunity of misunderstanding. And what we encourage is a very open communication in our newsrooms, where people can talk to each other honestly, without feeling they are being attacked. But it’s really difficult to work with such diversity of cultures. It’s a tough challenge.

    Sure, but the question is, how do you resolve that?
    We resolve that by getting people to get together and discuss issues together. And we also give people opportunity to take their issues up without putting their names. If somebody wants to talk to me about a report that he or she feels has been unfair to a particular group of people, they can send me an unsigned note.

    We also hold functions where I may not be there but my managers are there. Transparency is the most important thing.

    You are in charge of talent scouting too. What do you think of the talent pool in India in your line of work and how do you plan tapping that pool?
    Well, I’ll tell you what kind of talent we are looking at. There is a lot of talent here. For CNN International, the presenter has to be a really strong journalist, people who know how to write, and more importantly, people who can speak extempore without a script. There are times, during Breaking News stories, when people have to work for four hours at a stretch in front of the camera without a script. These are people who have to have a fairly strong recall, they have to know the history, the culture, and feel confident enough to express themselves without the written script.

    There are people who differ with me and say, ‘No, an anchor is very different from a reporter. They have to look good, have a good voice, look polished all the time… and it’s the reporter who has to be out there and do the story. No. I can’t afford to do that in CNN International.

    Our anchors are the ones who are on the field as much as possible. Because to my mind, there is no difference between an anchor and a reporter. In the case of Lebanon issue last year, for example, I had three or four anchors going from Atlanta reporting alongside CNN reporters.