Tag: I &B Ministry

  • I&B Ministry to meet industry leaders to discuss online video content regulation

    I&B Ministry to meet industry leaders to discuss online video content regulation

    Amidst reports of government considering certification/censorship of online video content, the I &B Ministry will hold a second round of consultation next week with industry players, who are determined to oppose any pre-censorship on digital platform.

    The I&B Ministry has invited all  online curated content providers (OCCPs), including Netflix, Amazon and Hotstar, through industry association, the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) for consultation on the issue of regulation of online video content, as per a report in ET.

    The meeting, slated for next week in Chennai, comes close on the heels of a similar consultation in Mumbai last month.

    In October, PTI had quoted union minister for information and broadcasting Prakash Javadekar as saying that there should be some kind of regulation of OTT platforms on the lines of print and electronic media and films.

    “I have sought suggestions on how to deal with this because there are regular feature films coming on OTT — good, bad and ugly. So how to deal with this, who should monitor, who should regulate?. There is no certification body for OTT platforms and likewise news portals also,” Javadekar was quoted as saying.

    Earlier in September, Live mint has reported that I&B Ministry was looking to finalize a model for the certification of online video streaming content soon after Diwali.

    However, any government attempt to regulate content on OTT, is bound to face stiff opposition from the industry, who believe that the existant IT Act 2000 and a voluntary self-regulatory code signed by major OTT players in January this year, are sufficient in dealing with any untoward situation.

    Online vidoe streaming players like Netflix, Hotstar, Jio, Voot, Zee5, Arre, SonyLIV, ALT Balaji and Eros Now have signed a self-censorship code in January that prohibited these platforms from showing certain kinds of content and set up a redressal mechanism for customer complaints.

    The self-regulation code, bars video players from showing content that’s banned by Indian courts, disrespects the national emblem and flag, outrages religious sentiments, promotes terrorism or violence against State and shows children in sexual acts. Amazon, however, is not part of the self-regulatory code signed under the aegis of IAMAI.

    “We should publish a list of all the laws that apply to OCCP platforms so that there is no is perception that OCCPs are not regulated,” Gowree Gokhale, head of Telecom, Media and Technology practice at Nishith Desai Associates, which is part of the consultation process, was quoted as saying by ET.

    However, despite the presence of a self-regulatory code, there have been an array of PILs in court demanding regulation of online video content.

    In May, the Supreme Court had issued a notice to the Centre on an appeal to regulate content on online streaming platforms.

  • Sun Group challenges denial of permission to bid for FM Phase III auctions in Chennai & Delhi High Courts

    Sun Group challenges denial of permission to bid for FM Phase III auctions in Chennai & Delhi High Courts

    NEW DELHI: The Sun Group’s challenge to denial of permission to participate in auction for Phase-III of FM radio broadcasting licences is expected to be heard both by the Madras and Delhi High Courts on 21 July, 2015. 

     

    The Group, in the petitions filed today (20 July), has also sought a stay on the order of the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry in this regard. The Ministry had last week issued a list of 21 bidders, which did not include the Group’s Red FM, and then sent a formal communication to the Group on 15 July that it had been denied permission. 

     

    The Court has been asked to direct the Centre to permit Sun Group to migrate to the Phase-III regime by allowing it to resubmit the application dated 20 March, 2015 to participate in the auction.

     

    When asked how case on a similar issue could be filed simultaneously in two High Courts, a spokesperson of Sun Group said the petitions have been filed by different companies which are part of the Group.

     

    A set of six writ petitions, which include three each by the company and the shareholders, has sought permission to resubmit its application to participate in the tender.

     

    The petitions also said the company was not involved in any dispute with the nation’s security, nor had it broadcast anything that affected the security of the nation.

     

    The petition alleges that the order denying permission had been issued “carelessly, with total non-application of mind and in a cavalier fashion, totally unmindful of its consequences and repercussions not only on Sun TV but also on the entire broadcasting and media industry.”

     

    Apart from the denial to participate in Phase III FM auctions, the order also implied that the sister companies of the Sun Group would be compelled to close down FM radio stations, totalling 45 across the nation, the petitioners said.

     

    “Non-inclusion of the company’s name on the list is nothing but closing the entire FM stations run by it for extraneous, illegal and mala fide reasons,” the petitions said.

     

    It has pointed out that the Indian Telegraph Act does not make any mention of security clearance, and licence can be terminated or denied only if there is violation of the terms of the agreement including any defaults in payment.

     

    Clause 2.2(b) of the Information Memorandum and Clause 3.2(b) of the Notice Inviting Application says only a company controlled by a person convicted for an offence involving moral turpitude or money laundering or drug trafficking or terrorist activities or is declared as insolvent will not be eligible to apply. The petitioners said there was nothing in the rules to deny permission the the Sun Group, which is controlled by the Maran brothers.

     

    Some financial cases – with no relation to the nation’s security – are pending against the two brothers but nothing has been proved, a Sun Group spokesperson told Indiantelevision.com.

  • Number of news and non-news TV channels is almost equal in the country

    Number of news and non-news TV channels is almost equal in the country

    NEW DELHI: Six private television channels got the government’s approval in the past month. But the number of news and non-news channels remains almost equal. The Information and Broadcasting Ministry revealed that a total of 792 TV channels have got permission in the country.

     

    A statistics by the I & B Ministry released today, reveals that the number of news and current affairs channels is 392 while the number of non-news (general entertainment channels) is 400. Of the total, 669 TV channels including 372 news channels have been given permission to uplink and downlink from within the country.

     

    There has been no change in the past month in the total number of channels uplinked from overseas that are allowed to downlink into the country. Out of these 91 channels, 75 are general entertainment channels. In all, nine channels received permission in 2014, all for uplinking from India.

     

    A total of 32 channels (just one more than last time) including 28 general entertainment channels are allowed to uplink from India but not downlink – thus they are aimed at other countries.

     

    The channels that received permission in January this year are the GEC channel ‘Hastey Raho’ owned by Sangeet TV Network in Hindi, English and all other Indian Schedule Languages; the news channel Satlon News owned by Satlon Enterprises in Gujarati, Hindi and English; the Maha Movie channel owned by Teleone Consumers Products in Hindi, English and all other Indian languages; and the GEC channel Green TV owned by Nomad Films in English, Hindi and regional languages.   

     

    In February, the channels that received permission were the news channel NSN News owned by Bhole Baba Real Estate Developers in Hindi, English and all other Indian languages; the non-news Daati Ahsas owned by Bhole Baba Real Estate Developers in Hindi, English and all Indian languages; the non-news Satkar owned by Cobol Communications in English and all Indian languages; and the news channel Prabhatam LIFELINE owned by Naman Broadcastings and Telecommunications in Hindi, English and regional languages.

     

    The lone channel to get permission this month was the Bengali non-news channel Fatafati owned by Squoosh Entertainment.

     

    On its website, the Ministry also uploaded the names of the companies that own these channels, the language, and the date when the permission was granted.

  • Film  industry  protests against service tax and VAT

    Film industry protests against service tax and VAT

    MUMBAI: Emboldened by the day-long fast that film and TV actors, filmmakers, technicians, theatre owners and distributors down South resorted to, the Film and Television Producers Guild of India has threatened the government that if the 12.36 per cent service tax is not rolled back, they will be forced to stop all film shootings from February onward. They have also threatened to not allow any film to release during this period either.

    It is well-known that many actors do not pay their service tax from their own pocket; most of them openly tell the producer that he has to pay them 12.36 per cent by way of service tax over and above their acting fee. Producers have evaluated the cost of every project to be 12.5 per cent more, thanks to this additional service tax passed on to them by a majority of actors.

    “The latest findings have put the Hindi film industry on the back foot. First of all, there is no guarantee of films doing well these days. Add to that the burden of service tax even before you start rolling the cameras. This is grossly unfair,” pointed out the source.

    Confirming the news Film and Television Producers Guild of India President Mukesh Bhatt said, “We have spoken to the I & B Ministry and the state government. We are compelled to enforce a closure by the end of January if service tax and VAT are not waived off. We cannot take the burden any longer.”

    It is said that the film fraternity is again meeting on Wednesday to chalk out a final decision.