Tag: Hum Hain Dilwale

  • “Viewers don’t allow us to experiment”: Jitendra Kumar

    “Viewers don’t allow us to experiment”: Jitendra Kumar

    On the dot of 2 pm, I am ringing the doorbell to his apartment. It has been a hot afternoon and seems to be getting worse. Someone lets me in and beckons me to sit. Sipping cold water in his drawng room, I wait. A few minutes later, a well-built 30-something guy in shorts comes rushing in. “Hi! I am Jitendra Kumar,” he says, stretching out his hand.

    Preliminary pleasantries excahanged, he shoots off, “First promise me you won’t ask about my future plans. I am sick of answering this question. Who knows his future? I will never forget the days when I constantly brooded about my tomorrow. Those were the days when I was just 21. I wanted to settle down quickly. I didn’t want to loaf around. But like most youngsters, I was very confused.” I interrupt him to put up my first question.

    Excerpts of a Q & A session with Vickey Lalwani.

    Did you always want to become a director?
    No. It just happened. I was a 20-something son of a zamindar in Haryana, trying to settle down in some sphere. But despite my best efforts, I could not. Believe it or faint, I changed as many as 11 businesses in a span of 12 months – garage, travel agency, Maruti showroom, restaurant and what not!

    I was here in Mumbai for a short holiday, when I saw Mahesh Bhatt shooting for Sadak in Film City. While most other people around me were looking at the stars, I was mesmerized by Bhatt. What command that man has when he directs! Something struck me and I decided that I wanted to be like him. I went back, packed my bags and came to Mumbai.

    Was Mumbai easy to get work in?
    Are you kidding? Here, talent is recognized but you need luck too. The first eight to nine months were terrible. Every director I went to said he had 20 assistants. One day, I met Raman Kumar. Pat came the reply, “I have nine assistants.” I don’t know how but I mustered up some courage to tell him, “If you have nine, you might as well have ten.” He smiled and asked me to call him up the next morning. I told him, “Sir, you are a big man. I will not be able to reach you via your phone operator. Can I directly come to the office at 11 am tomorrow?” He nodded.

    The next morning, he was not in his office when I reached. An hour later, I decide to trudge back home. As I was about to get up, the phone rang. It was Raman Kumar asking for me! He directed me to the sets where he was shooting. I reached there at about 2 pm, but we did not exchange a single world till 2 am! And all he did was ask me to come over to the office the next morning! Next morning, he patted me on my back and said, “Young man, you are on. I was testing your patience yesterday.”

     

     

    I do not condemn a channel’s decision to withdraw a serial. A flop serial to a channel is like a white elephant

    And then?
    Within the next two months, I became his right hand. I assisted him in Tara, Rahat, Shatranj, and many other projects. Every day, I learnt something new. I was passionate, no, obsessed with my work. Even after the shoot was over and done with, I used to sit down and make plans. Unlike boys my age, I never went to a discotheque or a pub, I never dated a girl (blushes).

    The golden period of my youth was spent slogging (smiles). I went back to my hometown for only two days, that is, when my younger brother expired due to brain fever! Raman Kumar taught me direction, production and almost everything he knew about TV serial making. Yes, I am Raman Kumar’s protégé.

    When did you start directing independently?
    Raman Kumar had shot for two – three days on Yehi Hai Zindagi (Zee TV). It was based on the famous Rajesh Khanna starrer Bawarchi. Archana Puran Singh played the protagonist. On the fourth day, he told me to handle the proceedings as he would be away in a meeting with Zee officials. He came back during the lunch hour, but refused to take the reins. I continued, and slowly he withdrew himself.

    YHZ was a great experience. I was at the helm for 52 episodes. It was one of the top five grossers on television at that time. Later, Raman Kumar’s company ran into financial problems. Archana left the serial, so did I. She and I, however, became good friends during the making.

    Did she help you from there?
    You guessed it right! She was doing two shows for Cinevista- Jaane Bhi Do Paro and Nehle Pe Dehla. We both began co-directing the two projects. After about 26 episodes of both the serials, she delivered her first kid. From there on, I took over. Came Kati Patang, Apni Khushiyan Apne Gam, Hum Hain Dilwale, Har Mor Par, Hum Hain Aapke, Pyar Zindagi Hai and Henna (the last two are currently on air).

    You had shot something with Mohnish Behl too. Right?
    (smiles) Oh, so you know about that! Yes, I did shoot about eight episodes with him for a serial for Mak TV. But the channel did not come on air!

    Your ‘Hum Hain Dilwale’ was a major disaster, wasn’t it?
    Yes. Well, it wasn’t launched properly. There was no propaganda, it just burst out one fine day. But at the end of the day, the hype does not really count. If your content is good, even then your serial may flop. Somehow, our viewers wants to either cry or laugh. Plus they want lots of moral values all the time. They don’t want too much of intellectual stuff or something new. They don’t allow us to experiment.

    HHD had lots of young and trendy culture with four youngsters Rohit Roy, Rakhee Tandon, Nilanjana and Vishal Singh; it did not stir sentiments- no stomach aches, no tears; it bombed. HHD might have worked if it had been aired in a late-night slot.

    As a director, don’t you get frustrated when the channels ask you for changes when the TRPs are low?
    I do. But ‘kya karen’? You can’t look at this phenomenon from only one side. You have to see the channel’s perspective also. Low TRPs indicate failure. If there is less attendance in a theatre for a particular film, will the theatre continue to run that film? At least here, we are allowed to run for sometime. I do not condemn a channel’s decision to withdraw a serial.

    A flop serial to a channel is like a white elephant. Also, why do you forget the amount of competition that channels face in today’s times? Gone are the days when there was only DD, or say DD and Zee. Today, the competition is not fierce but ferocious. Try to understand that channels are in the fray to do business.

    “Today, channels have acquired such status as brand names that the viewer decides the quality of the programme by the name of the channel”

    You are one of the few directors who speak the channels’ language?
    We have to be practical. There is no point in beating our chest on creativity. Channels are not killing a director’s creativity. They are not governing how we extract the maximum from an artiste. They don’t decide what angle the shot be taken from. They are mainly concerned about the look- the grandeur of the room, the clothes of the artistes etc.

    What’s wrong in these things? What’s wrong in meeting them midway and working cohesively? Today, channels have acquired such status as brand names that the viewer decides the quality of the programme by the name of the channel! All said and done, every director who is sore about channel interference must stop sitting on his false ego and realize that the channel is bigger than his/her own self.

    But do the channels really know what the people want? Or, is this a blind war of one upmanship?
    Of course, they know. Today, nobody writes letters to the editors in newspapers and magazines to convey their taste about a programme. They straightaway fire an email to the channel, and before the director has an explanation or an excuse to justify his failure or error, the channel is ready with the remedy. And of course if things don’t work out even then, as I explained earlier, they have to call it off because of their business interests.

    Do you have assistant directors?
    Five. I keep a strict tab on all of them.

    How do you select them?
    I chose people who say they want to learn and not people who say they have learnt. The first thing I tell them is ‘this is not a 9-5 job, get ready for odd hours of working’. Many times, I have sacked people who just want to hang around the sets on be seen with me. I want people who bring their individual energy on my table. I shun those who want to lean on me and learn. Presently, two of my assistants are girls.

    What kind of an atmosphere do you maintain on the sets?
    As cool as cucumber. Even if an artiste goofs up a scene 10 times, I do not lose my temper. It will not help. If he/she is already nervous, it will only make him/her more nervous.

    Have you ever reduced someone’s role if he/she failed to deliver?
    I have. As I told you, channels are doing business. In other words, television programmes are business ventures. At times, I have reduced someone’s role even if he/she has loads of attitude. There are some TV artistes who behave very haughty. My policy is simple: ‘I’ll respect your work if you respect mine’. Sometimes, however, if the artiste is too integral to the script, I have to bear him/her.

    Ever thought of writing scripts?
    Many people have suggested this to me. They say that a director is better when he himself has written the script. He flows with the script, he knows exactly what he wants, blah, blah, blah. Somehow I like to take a fresh look at the script. At times, I tried writing, but lost my way. Script-writing is not my domain.

    Some people have even said that if a director writes the script, he can take the shot from a better angle; his vision for the output is better then. But tell me, how many people who see television realise which angle the shot should have been actually taken from? The public does not understand the technicalities of the game. They want good acting.

    A director has told us ‘There are no bad actors, only bad directors’. Comment.
    Rubbish. Amitabh Bachchan is like a Land Cruiser. Press the accelerator and he starts to run at 200 km/hr. I think that answers your question! (smiles).

    Your message to aspiring TV artistes?
    Stop being conscious about how you look. Channels will take care of your looks, depending upon the character you are selected to play. Focus on getting into the skin of the character, and initially, do not take on too many assignments.

    Have you been offered films?
    About 15-20. But all these guys wanted someone who would only call ‘Cut’ and ‘Action’. They have ready scripts, a ready star cast. I respect the channels and meet them midway. Similarly, I would love to meet the film producers midway too. But I can’t be an absolute puppet in their hands!

  • “The viability of a concept plays a significant role in getting a time slot” : Rakhi Tandon

    “The viability of a concept plays a significant role in getting a time slot” : Rakhi Tandon

    Rakhi Tandon shot into prominence as the chirpy, imbecilic teenager in the TRP buster Hum Paanch five years ago. While she continues to be as vivacious, the former Ms Vijan has metamorphosed into a successful TV producer, after her marriage to producer Rajeev Tandon. Rakhi though has taken to her new role like a fish to water.

    Apart from the hugely successful Heena, the other shows produced by her R.T. Entertainment include Professor Pyarelal,Cincinnati Bublaboo and Dulhan. The company is now poised to start a new innings with the launch of two new serials in the first week of March 2002. These comprise Har Mod Par, a daily inspired by a real life sati incident in rural India and a weekly sitcom Hum Hain Dilwale launching 7 march on Sony Entertainment in the Thursday 8 pm slot.

    Indiantelevision.com correspondent Amar met the producer to discover that the real Rakhi is quite different from the audience’s general perception of her. Excerpts from a freewheeling interview:

    Is Rakhi Tandon the producer different from Rakhi Tandon the actor?
    As a person, I am extremely fun loving and vivacious. But I would also like to believe that I have always been a responsible person and that as producer, I know my responsibilities are increased manifold. My performance as producer would probably indicate that I’ve done a pretty decent job.

    A new channel never defaults on your payment, because it starts off with a lot of money.
    ____________

    Did you always want to be a producer?
    No, most things in life have happened to me by coincidences, most of them pleasant. I was accompanying a friend of mine for a screen test when the director spotted me and felt that I suited the character they were casting for. Similarly, I was enjoying my acting career when marriage just happened and I got interested in production.

    As a producer, which subjects appeal the most to you?
    Sitcoms are always my first preference. Apart from that, I look for subjects that have the scope of getting a social message across, subjects that give people food for thought. Har Mod Par is an effort in this direction. It’s the story of a 16-year-old girl who becomes a widow within hours of her marriage and is forced to commit sati by the village head because he wants publicity to bolster his claim for a railway track passing through the village. This is a real life incident.

    On what basis do you choose a channel?
    Sony and Star are old favorites by virtue of the relationship we have built with them. But the decision to take Har Mod Par to Sahara was taken on the basis of the subject. We felt the subject would meet greater acceptability in the interiors and since Sahara has a wider reach in the interiors than other satellite channels, we opted for it.

    One of your programmes is also planned for MAK TV. In the current scenario, aren’t you skeptical of experimenting with a new channel?
    (laughs)A new channel never defaults on your payment, because it starts off with a lot of money. It’s only when the initial programmes don’t get the expected returns, that the defaults begin.

    Has any channel defaulted with you on payments or commitment of time slots?
    No, never.

    Do you feel big corporate houses like Balaji or UTV have a monopoly over the best time slots?
    Yes, to an extent that’s right. But, this so called monopoly also moves in cycles. Plus Channel had the best of time slots earlier, then there was a time when Cinevista became very powerful, and today it’s Balaji. Tomorrow, even we could be influential and get the best slots on all channels. However, I believe that the viability of a concept also plays a significant role in getting a time slot.

    Plus Channel had the best of time slots earlier, then there was a time when Cinevista became very powerful, and today it’s Balaji.

    Have you ever felt that despite having a fabulous concept you’ve missed out on pitching it to a channel?
    Yes, that has happened. But, in such cases instead of pre-selling the concept, I go ahead and shoot a pilot. Once, a top quality pilot is ready, channels tend to be more receptive to our concerns.

    Would you not want R.T. Entertainment to evolve into a corporate entity?
    We haven’t planned anything. I believe in crossing the bridge when I come to it. Right now, our only concern is to bring out as many top quality programmes as we can.

    How do you divide your professional responsibilities with your husband?
    I mainly look after the marketing of our programmes, building relationships with channels, as well as the creative aspects of our shows. Rajeev takes care of the production, the shoots, the finances, the actual scripting and the post-production. Apart from that, we take joint decisions on taking up any new concepts.

    Do you have a fixed team of writers or do you experiment with new writers?
    I have a few favourites – Raghuveer Shekhawat, Sanjay Solomon, Nawab Arzoo and Naeem Ijaz, whom I like to repeat for various projects. At any point of time, I like to work on one project with them. But I am certainly open to new writers if they have fresh concepts.

    As a producer, are you more inclined towards stories that can have you in a central role?
    Yes, I guess that is a tendency with all actor-turned producers. That’s why R.T. is planning to come out with more comedies.

    Channels tend to be more receptive, once a top quality pilot is ready

    What is your production set-up like?
    We have a very well structured set-up comprising executive producers, directors and production people. There is one head director on each programme who works more as a series director and under him there are episode directors. Our production team comprises a team of five people with one production head.

    Have you ever felt hassled by the EPs in channels over cast or storyline?
    No. I know it’s a common complaint most producers have, but I have personally not faced this problem. On the contrary, I’ve found some of their inputs to be quite productive.

    Do you prefer producing weeklies or dailies?
    I prefer weeklies, because we are able to maintain a better quality in the case of weeklies. However, if a channel is willing to buy a concept only if it is made into a daily, I’m open to it.

    How do you balance your roles as actor and producer?
    Well, of late, I haven’t been acting much, mainly to concentrate on production but I have also decided to act only in comedies henceforth. This is because it suits me and people have loved me in the comic roles that I’ve done. I’m totally open to working for outside banners.

    Which has been the happiest moment of your career?
    It’s yet to happen.