Tag: EPL

  • Club Football to kickstart again: When & where can India tune in?

    Club Football to kickstart again: When & where can India tune in?

    MUMBAI: Manchester City – the undisputed team so far in this season of English Premier League has shown class and composure while defending champions Chelsea’s jittery start seems to last too long. Arsenal failed to sign a single outfield player in the transfer window and Manchester United are yet to go all guns blazing.

     

    After the international break, the club competition across the globe is all set to kickstart again. The top of the table affair in Bundesliga is also equally poised with both Borrosia Dortmund and Bayern Munchen tied up at nine points. It will be a battle between defence and attack when Atletico Madrid hosts Barcelona in La Liga. Fans will be eagerly waiting for to how the teams are shaped up after transfer dealings.

     

    In India, Star Sports holds the broadcasting rights of EPL and Bundesliga, while one can tune in to Sony Six and Sony Kix for La Liga and Italian SerieA actions.

     

    Indiantelevision.com compiles a list of important not-to-be-missed matches:

     

    Indiantelevision.com compiles a list of important not-to-be-missed matches:

     

    Saturday, 12 September

     

    Everton vs. Chelsea, 05:05 pm, Star Sports 4 and Star Sports HD 4

     

    FC Bayern Munich vs. FC Augsburg, 6:46 pm, Star Sports 2

     

    Hannover 96 vs. Borussia Dortmund, 6:46 pm, Star Sports 2 HD

     

    Arsenal vs. Stoke City, 7:20 pm, Star Sports 1 and Star Sports HD 1

     

    Crystal Palace vs. Manchester City, 7:20 pm Star Sports 4 and Star Sports HD 4

     

    Eintracht Frankfurt vs. 1. FC Koln, 9:46 pm, Star Sports 2 and Star Sports HD 2

     

    Manchester United vs. Liverpool, 9:45 pm, Star Sports 4 and Star Sports HD 4

     

    Frosinone Vs Roma, 9:30 pm, Sony Six

     

    Sporting Gijon VS Valencia 9.45, Sony Six HD

     

    Espanyol VS Real Madrid 7.30, Sony KIx

     

    Sunday, 13 September

     

    Atletico Madrid VS Barcelona 12 AM, Sony Kix

     

    Hannover 96 vs. Borussia Dortmund,12:00 AM, Star Sports 1 and Star Sports HD 1

     

    Sunderland vs. Tottenham Hotspur, 5:50 pm Star Sports 4 Star Sports HD 4

     

    1899 Hoffenheim vs. SV Werder Bremen 6:46 pm, Star Sports 2 and Star Sports HD2

    Leicester City vs. Aston Villa, 8:20 pm, Star Sports 4 and Star Sports HD 4

     

    Match Of The Week, Athletico Madrid vs. Barcelona

  • Can India become a sports merchandising haven?

    Can India become a sports merchandising haven?

    MUMBAI: The entire business fraternity in India gets buoyed by 500 plus cumulative reach of a sporting event or a movie grossing over Rs 300 crore, but hardly puts any effort in translating this success into other formats. One of the most reached sporting event in India, the Indian Premier League (IPL) over eight years of operation, faltered to develop the merchandising business in India. The story is quite similar in movies too. Star Wars holds the record of largest selling merchandises in movies as it has garnered $12 billion over the years and is still evolving. Indian super hero movies like Krrish and Ra:One hardly managed to scratch the surface of the huge merchandising industry.

    Since last year, PUMA has been pumping some much needed energy into the dormant merchandising industry in India. The sports apparel giant signed a five year deal for approximately $51 million per year with London based English Premier League (EPL) football club Arsenal FC in 2014. Arsenal is ranked seventh in the list of top Soccer team valuations, which is lead by Spanish giants Real Madrid FC.

    This year, PUMA flew all time Arsenal legends Ray Parlour and Sol Campbell to India and made them launch the Home and Away kit. A screening of historical Invincibles documentary was organised alongside road shows. Mehboob Studios in Mumbai turned into a battalion of gunners wearing red and white, welcoming the legends wholeheartedly by cheering out loud and clear.

    Parlour and Campbell were mesmerised, and the eagerness in fans’ eyes to see the new kit unveiled was an encouraging sight for PUMA India managing director Abhishek Ganguly. “India holds 10 per cent of Arsenal’s social media fan base and we feel, we are stronger together. This year’s campaign is named ‘Powered By Fans,’ to make fans feel special to celebrate with them. The new kit is an elevated version of last year, more comfortable, more stylish” he said.

    Speaking to Indiantelevision.com about the merchandising market in India, PUMA India executive director product and merchandising Atul Bajaj says, “The market is still at a nascent stage. However, the growth potential is huge and as long as the brands involved have synergies it is a win-win situation. Though the size of licensed merchandise globally is much bigger, the growth rate for this segment is in the range of 80-90 per cent.”

    To add to PUMA’s delight, the team broke its trophy jinx by winning the FA Cup in 2014 and wearing PUMA apparel they defended it by winning again in 2015. The fans are more excited now as they believe the league title is inching closer. Sharing PUMA’s aspirations in the second year into the deal Bajaj asserts, “We expect a huge growth in this second year of our association, exceeding 200 per cent. Arsenal has a huge and loyal fanbase, the performances are great with much more to follow and to top it all we have a great merchandise range for the fans. It also helps that Indian fans comprise close to 10 per cent of overall Arsenal fans on social media.” 

    As can be seen below in the graph, the sports merchandising market globally grew to $20.07 billion in 2015 compared to $19.57 billion in 2014.

    The other factor that predominantly hampers the merchandising industry is piracy. Substantial number of football fans are often spotted all over the country wearing club jerseys but seldom are they original. Though for PUMA the target audience is totally different, Bajaj feels knockouts do damage a brand.

    He says, “While knockouts damage a brand, however in terms of business, the target group is completely different. The Arsenal fan and PUMA consumer would never want to buy or wear a cheap fake knockoff. We also have a legal cell in place, which proactively ensures that this menace is minimised.”

    Merchandising is not only limited to jerseys, which is the most expensive one but other exclusive products like training kits, wrist bands and stockings used by the players also attract fans. However, brands do not pay enough attention to those, feels Arsenal’s officially recognised Delhi fan club admin Nishant Singhal.

    Speaking to Indiantelevision.com, Singhal says, “Powered By Fans delight every fan and the ones that I interact with wear the official jersey of the team. The problem with merchandising is the range of products. Apart for home jerseys, it is very difficult to find anything available and I would request PUMA to change that. Special thanks to them for getting Ray Parlour and Sol Campbell in India. Pricing is not an issue as it is identical globally and people can buy online to avail many discounts.”

    Speaking on the range of products, Bajaj claims, “PUMA has a complete range of Arsenal products including Replicas, fanwear, footwear, accessories and more. An Arsenal fan will have the complete range of products available to choose from and enough options to showcase his love for the club.”

    Bangalore Arsenal FC official fan club admin Vinay CP is also buoyed by the fact that this year the campaign is named Powered By Fans. He oversaw the proceedings of the 2014 jersey launch. Vinay feels that PUMA is giving adequate visibility to Arsenal products. “In every PUMA store that you enter, you will see Arsenal merchandise everywhere and that’s something I like as a fan. The reason why the merchandising business is not picking up in India is because of the pricing and piracy. Still the number of original jerseys is going up substantially.”

    PUMA has also tied up with Amazon India to enhance its reach. The home jerseys, which are priced at Rs 4299, can be purchased from PUMA outlets, in.Puma.com and Amazon India. “Amazon helps us reach to a far wider group of consumers and markets, which were earlier inaccessible. The ease of purchase encourages people – who either do not have access or do not want to travel, but be able to get the latest products sitting in their homes. Above all, it provides us a great platform to engage with the fans. Our event related posts on Amazon’s social media for example drove top tier engagement rates,” adds Bajaj.

    Baseline co-founder and director R Ramakrishnan feels that in India, merchandising and licensing has huge growth potential. “India is a lucrative market and that’s why PUMA is aggressively promoting Arsenal merchandises by getting in legends in the country. Football merchandising is always a style quotient, the jerseys are always elegantly designed with one title sponsor on it, which one can wear and flaunt unlike those in IPL where it becomes more billboard and less apparel because of the number of sponsors. Given the youth population in the country, I think elegant merchandising will pick up in India,” he says.

    A merchandising expert on condition of anonymity opines, “The merchandising partners never really ran an interactive on ground campaign be it WWE, football or cricket and hence the merchandising industry never picked up. It’s so ironical that a country like India, where cricket is considered as less sport and more religion, hardly has a substantial merchandising base. On one side, you have Sachin Tendulkar and on the other side Michael Jordan or Kobe Bryant. India never took merchandising seriously. PUMA is bringing in what was missing in merchandising industry, they got in Arsenal legends, organised a road show, screened Invincibles for the first time in Asia and that’s the way ahead. They have already started putting hoardings on prime locations. As a well wisher of the merchandising industry I feel all the licensed partners should put in more efforts and rejuvenate the industry.”

    IPL chairman Rajiv Shukla in the recent past had said that the BCCI will sell IPL merchandise centrally to boost up the sector. Seven out of the eight teams agreed to that, whereas Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) decided to sell their merchandise separately as they already invested a lot in developing the business. Overall, it remains to be seen if other big names will also join in and contribute to what PUMA has started for the merchandising industry in India to pick pace and reach its potential.

  • “Creating sporting events more important than acquiring expensive rights”: Sanjay Gupta

    “Creating sporting events more important than acquiring expensive rights”: Sanjay Gupta

    MUMBAI: Star India is in major over drive mode. The network has picked up a 74 per cent stake in Mashal Sports, which is the owner of Pro Kabaddi League.

     

    While delivering a keynote at the 2015 edition of Asia Pacific Video Operators Summit (APOS) Star India chief operating officer (COO) Sanjay Gupta spoke about the company’s aim to spawn a multi-sport culture in the country by promoting local content with events like Indian Super League (ISL) and Pro-Kabaddi League.

     

    “People are queuing up to buy an English Premier League (EPL), a LaLiga or a Bundesliga, but the question here is how much engagement do these games actually offer as compared to relevant local content. We tried this with ISL and Kabaddi and the initial response has been very encouraging,” Gupta informed.

     

    “Sports is a long haul business and it takes sustained investment to build something ground up. We need to have a long term commitment to build a sport… a 10 to 20 years approach to build it ground up. Take the example of EPL, which has been around for decades and has built an extremely strong consumer franchise, which advertisers are eager to associate with. The three year view of buying sporting rights has to change, which disallows most of the partners to make money and disincentives anyone trying to build a sport,” he further added.

     

    Talking about lack of innovation in stifling sports business economics, Gupta said, “When there’s a big sporting event, people congregate to watch in huge numbers. The only question is if there are enough of these happening and how much innovation has been happening.”

     

    Speaking about mushrooming ventures like ISL and Pro Kabaddi League, Gupta added, “Better engagement in sports will drive greater consumption. People don’t look happy when they win a sports bid. Practices in the sports business have become quite toxic. Instead of a content creation business this has been run as a rent a cab business. If I am league owner, chances are I’ll squeeze more money from you than you can ever hope to earn. One of the challenges that we are seeing is that almost all of the investment in sports is going into rights cost. We are trying to change that by investing in basic sports infrastructure apart from rights, whether it was grooming the players for an on screen experience in Kabaddi or partnering to get the stadiums ready for ISL.”

     

    Speaking about the stake acquisition in Mashal Sports, Star India CEO Uday Shankar said, “Star has acquired a majority stake in Mashal Sports with a vision to create an even more favourable ecosystem for the great Indian sport of Kabaddi and build on its successful launch. The investment, completely in sync with Star’s aim to spawn a multi-sport culture in the country, will further help in nurturing India’s sporting talent. We are totally committed to abiding with the vision of Mashal management and all stakeholders of Pro-Kabaddi and will further develop the league in the upcoming season 2.”

  • Fan base needs to increase for sports team monetisation: Panel

    Fan base needs to increase for sports team monetisation: Panel

    MUMBAI: India’s evolving sports ecosystem has a lot to offer in terms of opportunities for monetisation. But in order for that to happen, a stronger fan base with long term loyalty to respective teams and better infrastructure like stadiums need to be created. This was the opinion shared at a session on monetisation from sports in India titled ‘The M-Word “Monetisation”- Lessons To Learn,’ which was held at the Australia Business Week in India.
     
    The panelists included, Australian proximity engagement company and Touch Holdings managing director Simon Szewach, Populous senior principal Andrew James and SE TransStadia COO Hiren Pandit. The session was moderated by Victoria University Dean College of sport and exercise science professor Hans Westerbeek.
     
    The discussion began with Westerbeek asking the panelists whether it was worth investing in Indian sports? Pandit shared his knowledge by replying that investment in Indian sports can be seen in two ways; either as an associate with the sport or as a pure business investment. “Is the sport like the Indian Premier League (IPL) large enough for all franchises to make money?” he asked. He added saying that apart from making profits from their respective teams, owners had used their franchises for other better purposes than just receiving ROI. “The UB Group, which owns the Royal Challengers Bangalore uses the team to gain visibility because advertising of liquor brands is not allowed in India,” he informed.
     
    James felt that passion for the sport was the first step necessary for investment, followed by steps to connect with fans. “Currently there is a boom in the UK to build stadiums so that English Premier League (EPL) teams can connect better with the fan base. On the other hand, the Liverpool team has more fans in Indonesia than in the UK.” He opined that it was now necessary to capture this fan base and monetise it. For example Liverpool selling its jerseys in Indonesia and making profits from the same.
     
    Castellino then said that the honeymoon period, whereby sports is only looked in terms of passion, was over. “Sports should now be looked as a business seriously,” he said. He went on to say that it was a challenge to create winning franchises, which could deliver not just during tournaments but also during non-game events in order to pull in fans. Providing an analogy he said Manchester United had 80 per cent of its fan base in different parts of the world and 20 per cent only in the UK! He found that teams should first gather fans of this scale on board and then make money.
     
    Westerbeek then posed a second question: “Famous clubs like Real Madrid and Barcelona are fan membership driven, wherein the profits are directed back towards these clubs. Is the club membership model effective in India?”

    Pandit, relating to the share market, said that India’s population was very large versus the size of investors, which was very small. He also found it difficult to define a “fan” in India due to their fickle nature as they tend to follow only a winning team. He therefore said that India was not ready to have a model where fans could own a team. “India is not a sporting nation but a nation of couch potatoes, who want to lie back and watch a match on television. Single person investors are ready but not 1,000 fans,” he emphasised.
     
    Szewach at this point interjected and said, “Passion for sports drives out when not reinforced through constant messages. There is a need to constantly engage with fans throughout the year.” He lamented about how he found it difficult to purchase jerseys of the IPL franchises in sport shops, even when the event was just a few months away.
     
    Castellino felt that professionalism, which has entered the Indian sports ecosystem now, would help in its growth in the long run.
     
    The discussion then revolved around the role of federations in India and if they were a stumbling block when it came to monetisation of sport entities.

    Pandit opined that most federations were interested in governing the sport rather than promoting it. “It is a complicated situation,” he said, adding that the challenge currently would be to prove to the government that they are only required for the short term and entities can become self sufficient in the long run. “Studies have shown that our stadiums are used only for two per cent of the time and therefore are under utilised. There exists a vicious cycle between grassroots programme and monetisation,” he said.
     
    James recalled his first visit to India 10 years ago wherein he met N Srinivasan and Lalit Modi. He found it shocking how one single Indian player could earn more income versus the revenue generated by stadiums. “It is extremely inexpensive to build a stadium in India versus the cost of building a 500 million pound stadium in the UK,” he said.

    Post the discussion, the panel was seen sharing their thoughts with the audience. They were of the opinion that much more was needed to be done and there were a lot of opportunities for sponsorships for various teams. Westerbeek concluded by saying, “It is about two magic words – ecosystem and opportunities – for the Indian sports market. A lot more concrete definition would come by in the next five years.”

  • Taste of India available at Sony’s ‘Cafe Rio’

    Taste of India available at Sony’s ‘Cafe Rio’

    MUMBAI: It was almost 65 years ago that a revolution started from a small village in Gujarat, and since then Amul has been a part and parcel of our lives, everyday.

     

    The company, which saw Rs 18,150 crore turnover last year, has become a part of our lives like its products. From just sarcastic hoardings on topical issues, Amul has now ventured into the television screens through its limited advertisements, but what has caught more attention is its association with various sporting events.

     

    The year 2011 saw the Anand-based Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation (GCMMF) sponsoring the cricket team of Netherlands in the ICC Cricket World Cup and Switzerland-headquartered Sauber F1 team at the inaugural Indian Grand Prix. It took a step further when it decided to sponsor the Indian contingent at the London 2012 Olympic Games.

     

    And now with the football fever gripping the entire world, the ‘Taste of India’ can be seen on our screens every day before the game begins. Amul is the main sponsors of the shows – Cafe Rio and Football Extraa – on Sony Six.

     

    “Our sponsorship of Cafe Rio and Football Extraa was a good option as it gave an opportunity to cover the entire event very comprehensively right from pre-match discussion to post-match wrap up during the breakfast show next day,” says the company’s MD RS Sodhi.

     

    When asked why this sudden interest in sports, he says, “Milk is nature’s original energy drink and plays a pivotal role in building the physical and mental strength of the sportsmen. Nutritious dairy diet comprising milk, cheese, yogurt etc. is an important part in the diets of athletes around the world. India is the largest producer of milk in the world and Amul is not only India’s but Asia’s largest milk brand.  This association with sports and activities around it will help us in engaging with the youth so that they can enjoy a healthy life and strive to become more competitive in their endeavours.”

     

    It also believes that sporting events are now getting increasingly popular amongst all age groups, both men and women and hence, live sporting events provide a good opportunity for the brand. So much so, that it has become an integral part of its media plans. “We do not treat this as an additional spend,” points out Sodhi.

     

    The cherry-picking begins well in advance since the schedule of most of the sporting events is available much in advance. So far, it has associated itself with events like F1, Olympics, IPL, EPL and now the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Many more such associations with other events is on cards.

     

    The brand’s marketing strategy has changed as well. The girl in the polka-dot frock is inseparable from the brand’s identity, but through its recently launched digital campaign ‘Har ghar Amul ghar’, because it wanted a longer format that went beyond 40 seconds followed by a humorous campaign featuring a person with a milk moustache who ‘Eats Milk with Every Meal’, it has (finally) moved on with time.

     

    The audience plays the key role when it comes to media selection. “If a large number of our youth are on social media, we cannot ignore it. We have a very high traction on social media – be it Facebook or Twitter. Our topicals are first released on social media, then on hoardings, TV and print. The topicals are published in 35 newspapers every Wednesday with a print run of over 35 million copies,” informs Sodhi.

     

    At the recently concluded World Dairy Innovation Awards 2014 during the eight Global Dairy Congress, Amul bagged the ‘Best Marketing Campaign’ award for the ‘Eat Milk with Every Meal’ campaign. The full-page format across leading dailies like the Times of India, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, The Telegraph, Deccan Chronicle etc. highlighted the importance of milk and dairy products in every one’s diet. “We are happy that our efforts have got recognised at the global level,” says Sodhi humbly.

     

    FY14 was extremely good for Amul and with its expansion plans the brand is optimistic about 2015 as well. “Amul has been growing at a CAGR of 22 per cent since last five years. Our last year’s growth was 32 per cent. And we plan to grow by 20-25 per cent this year too,” concludes Sodhi.

  • SingTel appeal over EPL cross-carriage rejected

    SingTel appeal over EPL cross-carriage rejected

    MUMBAI: Singaporean IPTV operator mioTV will have to share its English Premier League coverage with rival platform StarHub after losing an appeal seeking an exemption to the country’s cross-carriage rules for pay-TV content.

     

    In April, the Media Development Authority (MDA) ruled that SingTel-owned mioTV’s non-exclusive deal for EPL live matches for three seasons beginning this August triggers the “Cross-Carriage Measure,” which took effect in August 2011.

     

    Under the cross-carriage ruling, pay-TV platforms that acquired any exclusive content on or after 12 March, 2010, must make that programming available through the set-top boxes of other platforms. SingTel subsequently lodged an appeal against the MDA decision with the Minister of Communications and Information.

     

    “The minister’s decision to reject SingNet’s appeal was made based on the assessment of a number of factors,” a statement from the ministry said. “A key consideration was whether certain clauses in the agreement between SingNet and the Football Association Premier League prevent or restrict or are likely to prevent or restrict the EPL content from being acquired or otherwise obtained for transmission on selected network platforms in Singapore by other pay-TV operators.”

     

    “The minister considered the qualitative and quantitative effects of these clauses. The minister also noted that the key objectives of the cross-carriage measure include addressing the high degree of content fragmentation and encouraging pay-TV operators to shift from a content-centric strategy to other forms of competition, such as service and content innovation. Pay-TV operators should keep this in mind and continue to provide better value to the consumers. The minister has also suggested that MDA consider providing further guidance on the circumstances that may trigger the cross-carriage measure so that pay-TV operators can provide more certainty to consumers.”

     

    Customers on both platforms will be able to purchase an EPL stand-alone subscription, granting access to some nine channels, for S$59.90 ($47) a month.

  • Six bags rights for Uefa Euro 2016

    Six bags rights for Uefa Euro 2016

     MUMBAI: MultiScreenMedia’s (MSM) sports channel Sony Six has added a feather in its cap in its bid to bag marquee properties that appeal to the youth.

     

    It has won the rights for the Uefa Euro 2016 soccer tourney across the Indian sub-continent. The channel will telecast live all 51 matches of the tournament. Last year’s edition aired on Neo. It has been learnt that Neo had paid around $10 million for it and the MSM deal was a substantial jump.

     

    The Euro, it is worth noting is the third most valuable soccer property behind the soccer World Cup and the English Premier League (EPL). The top European nations take part in it to find out which is the best in soccer. This acquisition is significant for Six as this marks its first entry into international football. The channel has aired the 2014 Fifa WC Qualifiers. The Euro 2016 event is the first successful acquisition of a major professional football competition by the channel.

     

    MSM CEO Man Jit Singh said, “Football has grown immensely in India over the past few years and has found great interest amongst the youth. With the successful acquisition of the Uefa Euro 2016 tournament broadcasting rights, we look forward to attracting viewership to Sony Six by leveraging on the growing popularity of European football in the country.”

     

    MSM COO NP Singh said, “We are delighted to bring one of football’s elite tournaments to the Indian viewers exclusively on Sony Six. As a broadcaster we are always in pursuit of the best of international sport and through our latest acquisition we will take the fans closer to the high impact action that the Uefa Euro 2016 promises to deliver.”

     

    Uefa marketing director Guy-Laurent Epstein said, “We are pleased to welcome Sony Six to the family of broadcasters for the Uefa Euro 2016. Uefa believes that the Sony Six channel and its commitment to high quality programming and sport is an excellent home for Uefa’s flagship national team competition.”

     

    Euro 2016 will be held in France with provisional dates of 10 June – 10 July 2016. For the first time in the tournament’s history, the 2016 finals will be a 24 team tournament, having been expanded from the 16 team format that had been used since 1996. At the finals, it is proposed that teams will be eliminated using a new format of six groups of four, followed by three knockout rounds, followed by the final. France has inherited direct entry into finals.

     

    In terms of other big soccer properties the 2014 World Cup rights are coming up for grabs as well and there would be competition for that as well. MSM president network sales, licensing and telephony Rohit Gupta said that the aim is to acquire marquee properties that appeal to the youth. “We already have the IPL which is the biggest property. We have identified soccer as a sport that we need to have. Euro was a big opportunity. As other properties come along like the World Cup we will evaluate them.”

     

  • “We will focus on compelling sports content, across multiple sports and languages”

    “We will focus on compelling sports content, across multiple sports and languages”

    By the end of 2011, Star had clearly established itself as the premier entertainment network in India and for Indians worldwide, with 400 million people watching our drama and movie channels in seven languages every day. In one of the most competitive markets in the world, we had established substantial leadership in every genre and in most geographies.And while Star and Fox had built an attractive franchise in entertainment, in sports, very unlike our traditional approach, we had tucked the business away in a joint venture with ESPN that was not managed or controlled by us.
     

    Starting in April 2012, this started to change. We acquired the rights to India’s international cricket calendar that month; a few months later, our parent company bought out its partner from the ESPN Star Sports joint venture in Asia with the intent to roll the Indian part of the joint venture into Star; we launched two new domestic leagues in university cricket and hockey; and we renewed the rights to English Premier League football with a substantive bid. All in all, we invested a billion dollars in less than six months.As a result, by the end of 2012, we had established ourselves as India’s leading sports broadcaster.

    So, why did we get aggressive on a business where the traditional wisdom is that no one makes money?

    Many experts mused loudly that Star had found a way to quickly kill a highly profitable franchise built on leadership in entertainment across genres and languages. I still run into these questions every day. Just two days ago, a leading Indian business daily ran a big story wondering why Star had entered a business that usually never makes money. After all, one sports broadcaster had gone bankrupt trying to pay the bills for the Indian cricket rights, another is struggling to break even and yet another is trying to run a sports business without much sports content. Why would Star make such a big, bold move particularly at a time when the overall

     sentiment on the India story has gone cold?

    So, again, why did we do this? Did we lose the plot?

    In order to answer this question, it is important to take a close look at a few facts, some conventional wisdom and many myths that surround the Indian sports business.

    Everyone in this industry knows one thing. India is a single sport country. It is a country where cricket is a religion, where passion for the game is deep and where the country shuts down when the national team is playing.

    And yet, this is only half the truth. Even for a big match where India plays arch rival Pakistan, consumers do not view the entire match, they view only 15 per cent of the match on an average. The reality outside of really big tournaments is even starker. Out of more than 1000 hours that an Indian viewer spent watching television last year, only 20 hours was on cricket, about 2 percent.This is actually less than the time spent on a single successful show on Star Plus!Consumption of domestic cricket is even worse. Although matches are played round the year, only 50 matches are broadcast on television in a year.And very often, the best of the country’s talent do not participate in these games.

    Imagine if soccer crazy England manifested its interest in the game only by watching the FIFA World Cup once in four years and only really paid attention when England played Spain or Italy. That is the equivalent of India’s current state in cricket viewership. In fact, until the Board of Control for Cricket in India introduced the Indian Premier League, there was not even a domestic league, the equivalent of an EPL or an NFL.

    So, India is not a single-sport country, it is at the moment a zero-sport country that occasionally follows 11 Indian cricketers when they play a big marquee tournament.

    For us, though, the more interesting question is why this happened, and what has led to the current state of affairs. We believe that the biggest culprit is the Indian sports broadcaster. Let me explain why.

    A big shift happened in the last twenty years in cricket in the profile of its followership. It moved from being a sport for the urban elite to one that has a mass following across the country.The BCCI deserves credit for this transformation by making substantial investments to improve the quality of stadiums and infrastructure around the country.Today, some of the country’s best cricketers come from outside the large cities; and small towns host international matches on a regular basis. It is also a country where less than 1 per cent of the population has actually watched any sport in a stadium.

    And, yet, sports broadcasters have not made any effort to make their programming more relevant to the new audience.

    In a country where less than 10 per cent of the population understands English, and a much smaller number are native speakers, sports broadcasters programmed only in one language: guess which one? English. This, despite the fact that everyone knew that the big growth in entertainment consumption in the country came when programming on satellite switched to Hindi and other local languages. And even for the very few that actually understand English, it is quite a world they have to navigate to understand the diversity of commentator accents on television: from the Westernised Indian accent to the local Indian accent to the Aussie accent to the Kiwi accent to the Scottish accent to the West Indian accent. It is almost as if the sports broadcasters were not relaying sports, they were running extraordinarily painful accent training programs on television for the very small English speaking audience that came to watch in the first place.

    The pain did not stop there. Around the world, sports graphics is used to bring the game closer to the viewer and to help the viewer understand the game. Yet, in cricket, graphics is more a nuanced tool meant to tickle the sensibilities of the few deep masters of the game, not the 99 per cent of the country that has never even been to a stadium. The same story extends to television commentary too. Rather than being the anchors of the game who explain the game and bring the excitement of the stadium to the viewer’s living room, the cricket commentator is invariably an expert talking to his peers.

    It is no surprise then that the Indian viewer does not spend much time on sports on television.

    But, it would be unfair to put all the blame on just the sports broadcaster. The broadcaster has had many fellow partners-in-crime in ensuring that sports viewership remains miniscule.

    It’s biggest partner has been the cable and satellite platform. Around the world, sports have been a huge driver of revenue and profit for pay television operators. In India every operator complains about the low ARPUs they get from the business. And yet, instead of using compelling sports content to get more money from consumers and reduce churn, the cable and satellite operators make it difficult for their subscribers to discover and develop a habit of consuming sports.

    And this attitude shows up in the distribution of sports channels, which are treated less like the mass product that they should be, and more as premium add-on products for a small, rich, niche audience.

    To make matters worse, these platforms turn off the channel when a marquee event is not on. While this may have made sense in the old, bandwidth-limited analog world where you could only put 20-30 channels, it makes no sense that even DTH operators are employing the same tactic when they have 300 channels to offer. Compare this to other content categories. They do not switch off a news channel when a breaking news event is not on; they do not turn off the movies channel when a blockbuster is not on. But this is exactly what they do in sports. It is the worst kind of behaviour that limits the ability to build habit for the sports fan.

    Even worse is the behaviour of a few platforms that have created their own channels that switch to the most marquee sports events of multiple broadcasters. While they hide under the pretence that they are addressing a consumer need, what they are really doing is illegal piracy. But what is distressing is that they do not understand the long term damage they are doing to the business. Instead of multiplying choices and triggering demand, they are creating a structure that will ensure that viewers only watch a few cricket events.

    Put together, it is therefore not a surprise that the reach of sports channels lags that of even niche channels like Discovery and MTV!

    So in a zero-sport country, sports broadcasters and pay-TV platforms have worked very hard to make sure that it is only the deeply committed, rich expert fan comfortable with English that actually watches a match on television.

    Of course, if the sports broadcaster and the platform have done their part in eroding the value of sports franchise, the regulator and the government have not been far behind.

     
    For the regulator and the government, the overwhelming objective must be to further consumer interest. It is in the interest of consumers to have more and more sports available for them. It is in the interest of any country to have more and more people play sports. And the reality is that people play sports only when they passionately follow games and teams. If India has to break its poor status in international sports and use sports to create a virtuous cycle for the larger society, then the regulator and the polityhave a powerful role to play.

    I am reminded of an incident that happened in Canada last year. When the hockey union went on strike, the prime minister of the country got involved because his fear was that a prolonged strike would have an adverse impact on the GDP of Canada! More than anything, it showed the power of sports and its ability to be a huge economic growth engine. It also shows the lens with which politicians and executives approach sports globally.

    However, the regulator, the bureaucracy and the political class have not shown such an enlightened approach to sports in India.

    Of all things, the regulator has imposed a cap on prices. A price cap is never good for the long term health of a business but it is especially absurd in the context of sports, where the market we operate in is truly global, where the acquisition costs for rights reflects a global market.

     What is even more absurd is that a news channel, a general entertainment channel, an education channel and a sports channel are all capped at the same level, without any linkage to the underlying cost of content or the relevance of its shelf life. Shockingly, Star Sports which has the most compelling portfolio of content in the country can charge no more than the country’s weakest sports channel with practically no sports on it.

    To make matters worse, the government has mandated that the most expensive sports events are events of national importance that need to be made available to the public broadcaster – who in turn not only retransmits an unencrypted signal to all its subscribers for free, but also makes it available to private platforms to carry the content under a statutorily mandated ‘must carry’ law. So even as you are making no effort to ensure wider coverage for all sports for the long term, you are killing the economics of the sports broadcaster by forcing it to share the most popular content today without adequate compensationand also legitimizing piracy by permitting access to sports content by platforms for free.

    The entire eco system has therefore unwittingly conspired to ensure that sports broadcast is unprofitable, sports consumption is limited and sports followership is minimal.

    So, the question comes back to: if things are looking so bad, why did Star decide to make a big push into sports?

    For only one reason.The current state of affairs is just not right, is not sustainable and is not good for anyone. Somebody needs to change this unhealthy equilibrium which is hurtingthe country, the consumer and the media industry.

    And as the country’s media leader, and as a company that has faced such hurdles before and still managed to build an outstanding franchise, we believe that we can shape this change.

    Clearly, change will not happen overnight. It will require a lot of effort to break the status quo. We will have to ensure that we create compelling sports content, across multiple sports, across multiple languages, with an economic structure that will add value for all.

    But, we are patient, as we always have been in India. And our history, our parentage and the coherence of our approach gives us confidence that we will build India’s first successful and profitable sports franchise.

  • ‘We plan to list at the US stock exchange to raise funds for the league’ : EFLI CEO Richard Whelan

    ‘We plan to list at the US stock exchange to raise funds for the league’ : EFLI CEO Richard Whelan

    There is a rush among sporting bodies to follow the Indian Premier League (IPL) way to build their sport. The latest to follow this route is American football.

    The Elite Football League of India (EFLI) is making an entry with its first edition ready to kick off in November 2012 in Pune. The franchise model starts with eight teams, building up to a total of 52 by 2022 representing all Indian cities with a population in excess of one million.

    EFLI will work with the Indian government to develop the first ever governing body for the game, similar to that of the BCCI and its governance of cricket.

    Ten Sports has the rights to televise 33 games in the first season including Saturday and Sunday games as well as 13 Monday Night Football games. The league will commence its first nationally televised game beginning November 2012 and the inaugural season will run through February 2013.

    EFLI plans to list in the US stock exchange to raise funds for the league.

    In an interview with Indiantelevision.com‘s Ashwin Pinto, EFLI CEO Richard Whelan talks about the growing sports market in India.

    Excerpts:

    You have a scene where different sporting bodies are looking at leagues in India. What is the reason for this sudden push?

    India is today one of the fastest growing economies in the world. Its vast middle class population acts as the backbone of its economy. They want more than just cricket; they are today watching F1, EPL, Wimbledon and various other sporting activities. This has encouraged people to explore opportunities in the dynamic Indian sports landscape.

    When you look at the Indian sporting landscape, what is your vision for EFLI?

    Looking at the sporting scene in India today, the future for EFLI looks very bright. Games like rugby, basketball and lawn tennis have gained a strong ground in this country. Moreover, F1 and other motorsports events too are getting off the ground. The environment for sports in India is very conducive.

    Have you done any research to find out how American football is perceived in India?

    Clearly we‘ve started from scratch, and the slate couldn‘t have been any clearer for us. This has been terrific. From the early responses to our training and orientation camps, we can tell that India has a great sporting culture hitherto unknown.

    The message about the advent of American football coming to India spread virally at the ground level purely through word-of-mouth and we‘ve had a massive response with hundreds of candidates turning up for player and coach trainings. We are overwhelmed with this kind of response, and whilst we understand that we need to educate people about the sport in its entirety, the desire to want to learn is very strong.

    Indians don‘t watch much of other sports except for cricket. A few major events like the soccer World Cup get some traction primarily among males. Do you see things changing in this regard?

    We have seen some radical changes in Indian sports scenario in these recent years. As recent as two months ago, there was a report in one of the leading English Indian dailies that audience and advertising revenue are bound to multiply in the coming years and that Indians love to see American sports on television.

    It‘s fast, furious and fun to watch. They further reported that according to Tam, Indian viewers are now watching sports other than cricket. There is no doubt in our minds that the EFLI has picked the right time for its Indian touchdown. Even women are keen on watching sports!

     ‘EFLI will create legal bylaws, working with the Indian government to develop the first ever governing body for the game, similar to that of the BCCI and its governance of cricket‘

    You start with eight franchises. How will this be scaled up?

    Economically, EFLI will have an astoundingly unmatched impact on India. The league will incorporate sponsorship from around the world and provide a platform for multinational companies to reach India‘s burgeoning retail market.

    EFLI will auction eight teams internationally. An opportunity will be created within the Indian investment banking arena to offer franchise, league and team ownership to the public marketplace. India offers enormous room for growth within the industry of sport. The US sports industry is currently valued at a half trillion dollars leading the layperson to easily recognise India‘s potential to reach beyond the scope of the American precedent.

    In order to achieve this standard, India must embrace and become a country of many sports. Football will lay the foundation and open the pathway for an explosive sports and media marketplace with reverberating impact into memorabilia and second and tertiary product sales. There is no question that, on behalf of India, football will elicit interest and participation from a broad spectrum of sporting enterprises once the door has been opened.

    What are the different revenue streams available to franchises and have you spoken to any parties for feedback?

    We are still working out these details.

    On the broadcast front, have you signed a deal with anybody?

    EFLI has signed letter of intent with Ten Sports to televise 33 games in its first season including Saturday and Sunday games as well as 13 Monday Night Football games.

    The league will commence its first nationally televised game beginning November 2012 and the inaugural season will run through February 2013.

    Could you talk about how you will partner the sports ministry to set up a governing body like the BCCI?

    We have set up EFLI, the first ever American-style Football Federation in India. This allows for the non-profit entity to work directly with the central government of India for the benefit of Indian society.

    EFLI will distribute 15 per cent of its revenue to the Sports Ministry of India to help maintain many of its ongoing programmes and facilities.

    Also, the league will forge strategic alliances by offering ownership opportunities to all Indian entities; business, military, political, municipalities, private and public partnerships. The EFLI will create legal bylaws, working with the Indian government to develop the first ever governing body for the game, similar to that of the BCCI and its governance of cricket.

    Could you give us an idea of the investments being made and by when you expect the venture to be profitable?

    We plan to list EFLI at the US stock exchange to raise funds for the league. We are planning to raise around $10-12 million through this route. Americans know the growth story of India and want to invest in India.

    The sports business industry is untapped and they are very familiar with the power behind American football. Besides tapping the US stock market, we are also looking at the option of raising funds from private investors but at this point we have quite a few options. We also have private investors and potential debt investors for equity down the line.

    Is the initiative being done under the aegis of the NFL and do you have similar leagues in other markets?

    No, EFLI has no affiliation with NFL. It‘s a completely independent entity which was formed by people sharing a similar thought process.

    There are various other leagues which are present in the US today like the United Football League (UFL), or the Stars Football League which will begin from August 2011. Even Canada has its own football league called the Canadian Football League (CFL). Apart from these professional leagues, there are other various semi-pro and amateur leagues which are held in various parts of United States.

    Could you talk about the team and support staff behind the EFLI?

    EFLI‘s management is in the hands of a very dynamic and experienced team. We have Sunday Zeller, who is the founder of this exciting new initiative. She has worked as a marketing consultant in branding and positioning startup enterprises to help attract capital and attention for the past 22 years.

    Then we have Alex Emmanuel who is the co-chairman. He was the Tata group global VP for Human resources. He has also worked with MNCs like ABB / Boehringer Mannheim. I am the CEO of EFLI. I come from a stock broking background. I had a firm called Moveable Cubicle. I have been involved in many start-up or early stage private companies, many of which went on to become publicly traded.

    Mohan Bangera is our COO. Previously he was Videocon VP marketing and sales. He has been closely associated with sports since a long time. He is the Technical Council of Judo Federation of India Chairman. Bangera comes with 30 years of experience in this field as a player, coach and administrator.

    We also have a robust executive management team with specialists from various backgrounds coming on board with their expertise in specific roles such as corporate alliances, production, events, marketing and choreography among other important job functions.

    What are the different facets of the EFLI?

    EFLI will create an exclusively Indian product packaged perfectly and specifically to advantage television and media support ultimately to become the most valuable sports franchise in the world.

    Thousands of jobs will be created as a result of the immense need for coaches, athletes, trainers, referees, and support staff as well as the even greater demand for employees in the legal, maintenance, media, marketing and retail sectors.

    EFLI will strive to eventually support the highest paid athletes in all of India. Founding athletes and coaches will have an opportunity to become owners of the league. The league will recruit and train a team that will physically and strategically compete at the level of the current US teams, one day defeating the US in competitive play.

    EFLI will establish a grassroots educational project to incorporate the game of football in schools beginning at grade school level extending to universities which will feed the professional recruitment efforts. By introducing and supplying footballs and equipment along with the programme, the league will provide a much needed physical and intellectual stimulus through competitive game play to the male youth of India.

    What are logistical challenges you will face and what is the strategy to tackle this?

    Educating people about the game, providing them with the right kind of exercise and nutrition to be able to play the game in its true form will be our biggest challenge. And we are fully aware of this, and will do everything possible to make this best in sports entertainment.

    What is American football‘s USP from a viewer‘s perspective compared to other sports that Indians follow like cricket and soccer?

    Indian viewers have opened up to newer sporting events in recent years. Sports like rugby and badminton have gained momentum in the Indian sporting culture.

    The introduction of American football will be a new robust sport that Indian viewers can look forward to. It‘s a game which needs speed, strength and strategy. These traits will keep the viewers to their seats. It‘s a total entertainment for the viewers.

    In the US, American football has maintained its pinnacle in a competitive and fragmented market with the Super Bowl being the most watched event in the year. What are the learnings from this success that you would look to apply in India?

    When football took off in America in 1960, there was a population of 180 million people; India has 1.2 billion.

    America had 45 million TV households; India currently has 130 million and this is increasing exponentially.

    The economic strength of the United States was $520 billion; the economic strength of India is currently more than double at $1.2 trillion and growing at a blistering pace! India is without doubt an exceptionally fertile market for the immediate and overnight success of the game of football.

    Having said that, you have the disadvantage of a relative lack of awareness for American football compared to other sports in India. How will you work around this?

    We agree that there is lack of awareness towards American football in the county but people are willing to know about this game. There is a huge Indian population in America which follows American football. This trend has passed on to the Indian audience as well.

    EFLI believes that it will easily be able to capture the interest of the enormous population under the age of 30 which has shown proven interest in American form of sports. The EFLI will be branded as the “New and Cool” intelligent ultimate athlete gladiator sport and form of entertainment.

    We also believe that the top US companies with an international presence or those looking to grow their international presence in this enormous 1.21 billion population market will have a keen interest in attaching their brands to the “proven power” of this game. The EFLI will capitalise from the unbelievable discrepancy between the number of unpaid athletes in the country and the enormous potential of gross revenue football has proven to capture through television and electronic media broadcasting, merchandising and licensing revenue, ticket sales, and local and corporate sponsorship as well as future team franchise sales.

    We plan to establish EFLI as an educational project at the grassroots level to incorporate the game of football in schools beginning at school level extending to universities which will feed the professional recruitment efforts. By introducing and supplying footballs and equipment along with the programme, the league will provide a much needed physical and intellectual stimulus through competitive game play to the male youth of India.

    What new technologies have come in to enhance the viewing experience of American football?

    These aspects will be worked upon in close cooperation with our broadcaster partner. Needless to say we will offer our viewers a cutting-edge and technologically advanced viewing experience.

    In terms of global television viewership, how does American football compare to the NBA, soccer and tennis?

    American football has gained strong ground outside US. It‘s now a very popular sport in countries like Israel, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Germany, England, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Hungary, Norway and Spain. Ironically, these are the nations where soccer and rugby are a religion. In terms of viewership, the Super Bowl has a global audience of over two million – this is an impressive number.

    What role do new media like mobile and social networks play for American football in building brand equity?

    Mobile and social networks play a huge role in building a brand name for American football. These are the new platforms through which we can spread the word amongst the new generation.

    They are connected through Facebook and Twitter for news and information, which I guess is apt to promote the game. Besides, new media tools like electronic and fantasy gaming have already proven their ability to attract consumers and also rake in huge profitability.

  • ‘IPL franchise ownership seems to be driven by celebrity rather than commercial reality’ : Intangible Businesses valuation director Richard Yoxon

    ‘IPL franchise ownership seems to be driven by celebrity rather than commercial reality’ : Intangible Businesses valuation director Richard Yoxon

    The Indian Premier League (IPL) defied financial gravity at a time when the world was struggling to fight the menace of recession. Even as capital became scarce, the world’s hottest cricket property managed to renegotiate a nine-year broadcast deal in 2009 for a whopping $1.6 billion. The earlier agreement, signed a year ago, had valued the TV rights for $1.03 billion over 10 years.

     

    The temporary refuge in South Africa was a welcome aberration, establishing the IPL as a global property. In 2010, the IPL became bigger and better as it attracted larger audiences, costlier sponsorship deals and fatter franchise bids, growing the cricket economy.

     

    Then came the Lalit Modi saga and charges of match-fixing, rigging of bids, financial irregularities and betting. The architect of the IPL is now suspended and a clean-up exercise has begun.

     

    A parallel has often been drawn between the IPL and the English Premiere League (EPL) that houses some of the world’s iconic soccer clubs including Manchester United.

     

    The IPL, however, has a big mountain to climb. Its TV rights, the main revenue supply for the entire structure including the teams, went for much less. Last year the EPL‘s TV rights bundles were acquired for $2.6 billion for 3 years. And it‘s not just a big difference in value. More importantly, the EPL‘s TV rights will be renegotiated twice before the IPL‘s current deal expires.

     

    But the IPL is just three years old and has seen a stupendous growth. It can learn important lessons from the EPL as it scales up, including doing shorter term TV deals in future as the property gets well established.

     

    The IPL team owners should also be cautious in not repeating the mistakes committed by their EPL counterparts. Some of the EPL club owners have funded their acquisitions through huge debt and have gone on to pay unrealistic amounts to purchase players. In fact, the EPL clubs are popularly known as the ‘rich boys‘ toys‘ that appeal to the owner‘s ego and vanity.

     

    In an interview with Indiantelevision.com‘s Sibabrata Das, Intangible Businesses valuation director Richard Yoxon talks about the challenges that sports properties face as they grow up to be run like big commercial businesses.

     

    Excerpts:
     
     
    Will it be right to compare the IPL as a potential sports property that can grow to the scale of the EPL in future?

    I think the IPL has more in common with the American franchise sports such as NBA and NFL than with the EPL. The success of English football was built on interest from local communities and commercialisation came a lot later. American sports and the IPL, on the other hand, were created and driven by commercial objectives.

     

    Football is the major sport in most countries. NBA, NFL and baseball are only major sports in the US while India is the only major economy where cricket is the number one sport.
     

     
    Can the IPL leapfrog?

    On the basis of global appeal, the IPL will never come close to the EPL. Commercially it‘s possible due to the size and growth of the Indian economy, but I think it‘s unlikely except in the very long-term as in a global context cricket is small beer compared to football.

     

    In a renegotiated deal in 2009, the IPL‘s TV rights went for $1.6 billion for 9 years. In contrast, last year the EPL‘s TV rights bundles were acquired for ?1.7 billion ($2.6 billion) for 3 years. A very big difference. More importantly, the EPL‘s TV rights will be renegotiated twice before the IPL‘s current deal expires.

     

    England has 3 professional leagues below the EPL and over 90 professional clubs!

     

    The Indian economy (2009 GDP $1,235 billion) will need to be multiple times bigger than the UK economy (2009 GDP $2,184 billion) for the IPL to leapfrog the EPL.
     
     

    Several EPL clubs are sunk in debt while the IPL has run into controversies very early in life. Do you see sports businesses being in trouble across the world?

     Not many football clubs currently or historically make a profit. It is often suggested that the clubs are ‘rich boys‘ toys‘ that appeal to the owner‘s ego and vanity. Football clubs are trophy assets rather than profit centres. This is a key similarity as I think IPL franchise ownership seems to be driven by celebrity rather than commercial reality.
     

     
    Are the allegations of match-fixing, rigging of bids and betting going to impact the IPL as a brand?

    The events are certainly not helpful but the impact will be minimal in the long-term if the BCCI acts promptly and transparently to address the problems. The Indian public loves Twenty20 cricket and the competition‘s format. This love affair with the game is not going to change as long as the game is cleaned up commercially. What‘s the alternative? I can‘t imagine the Indian public switching to football, hockey, kabaddi or even test cricket with equal fervour and enthusiasm.

     
     
    What is the IPL worth in value after 3 years of existence and how does it compare with the EPL?

    I think there is nothing wrong with the progress made to date by the IPL. I think the BCCI / IPL has done amazingly well in a short space of time.

     

    But we haven‘t valued either brand. Brand Finance valued the IPL brand at $4.13 billion, but I struggle to understand how the brand of a business whose main source of income is a 9-year TV deal for $1.63 billion can be worth so much.
     

    ‘IPL franchises certainly do need to scale up to justify the high franchise fees. The amount they need to scale up in the time available appears unrealistic‘

     

    But you have valued the IPL franchises and they are much below that of Brand Finance‘s estimates. Why?

    Brand Finance is, perhaps, more optimistic than us. Regarding the IPL, they have more ambitious growth rate projections and are less conservative in discounting.

     

    But if you look at our valuations, the top four teams are almost having similar values (Royal Challengers Bangalore at $37.7 million to Chennai Super Kings‘ $36.1 million). There can‘t be any particular team breaking too far ahead at this stage because there is no big difference among them. The difference is mainly due to the size and level of interest in the IPL franchise‘s catchment areas. Rajasthan Royals ($27.5 million) is distinctly disadvantaged compared to Royal Challengers Bangalore and Mumbai Indians (5th at $32.7 million).
     

     
    Do you see revenue streams a big problem with the IPL teams?

    They certainly do need to scale up to justify the high franchise fees. The amount they need to scale up in the time available appears unrealistic.

     

    As far as licensing and merchandising revenues go, the IPL franchises can tap their growing fan base. There will be a limitation, though, if you compare it with EPL clubs like the Manchester United where the shirts are even bought by the Japanese or the Chinese. The IPL team merchandise will find it difficult to cross the global boundaries and communities outside the Indian diaspora.
     

     
    What are the lessons the IPL needs to learn from the EPL?

    The IPL needs to negotiate shorter TV deals. I suspect that the IPL‘s 10-year deal (renegotiated deal after a year is for 9 years) was driven by necessity as the concept was unproven at the time of the negotiation. A longer deal was probably needed to get to potential franchise owners on-board by providing the assurance of guaranteed revenues and media coverage over a sufficient period to justify the initial franchise setup costs.

     

    The IPL is a closed shop. There‘s no promotion or relegation. Teams should earn the right to play in the IPL rather than buy their way in. The British public loves an underdog (hence I follow Rajasthan Royals in the IPL) and it is great for the sport when a small team gains promotion to the EPL on a shoestring budget and even beats one of the big names (Burnley won promotion to the EPL last year and beat Manchester United in their first home game).

     

    It is equally interesting when the big teams face the threat of relegation despite significant investment in players (Newcastle relegated last year). Relegation also maintains interest for longer; once teams are out of contention to win the IPL there‘s little to play for. It would be good to see the IPL develop feeder leagues to give smaller cities the opportunity to develop teams and aspire getting a sniff of the big time.
     

     
    When did the EPL commercialise?

    Football is a fabric of British society; it has been developed over 120 years. But the first big step towards commercialisation was when TV deals were renegotiated in 1992. Twenty top clubs separately negotiated for TV rights, which became the main driver for their increase in revenues. Previously, the TV rights were negotiated collectively for all the 90 clubs.

     

    Merchandising is a huge income for certain big clubs like the Manchester United. But for most of the clubs, the main income is from TV. Portsmouth, for instance, reported a total income of $60 million last season, out of which $40 million came from TV.

     
     
    Why has the enterprise value of the EPL come down recently?

    The same reason as any other market or business. Recession! Leisure and entertainment expenditure is cyclical. It‘s to be expected that consumers spend less on leisure and entertainment during recessionary times. In the medium and long-term, leisure and entertainment is a fast growing but highly competitive market.

     
     
    Why have the EPL clubs amassed huge debt?

    Two reasons. First, leveraged buyouts. Manchester United and Liverpool were bought by Americans using debt finance which was pushed onto the club‘s balance sheets. The clubs did not create these debts.

     

    The second reason is bad management – spending more than the club can afford in the hope that any resulting success will pay for the gamble.
     

     

    Is there a current crisis?

    What crises? The EPL is as popular as ever. Football clubs going bust is nothing new. The fans suffer in the short-term but the club survives.

     

    There are no major threats to the EPL. It‘s been going on since 1888 (rebranded in 1992); it‘s survived two world wars and hooliganism in the late 1970‘s / 1980‘s. The current exchange rate and increased income tax rates make playing in England less appealing financially for the world‘s top footballers. This has yet to have an effect but this summer I expect we‘ll see less big name players than usual moving the EPL in favour of Spanish, Italian and German leagues. This will not affect popularity in the UK but may have an impact on global interest in the medium term.
     
     

    Have foreign owners contributed to the financial mess?

    International investors have actually made the EPL economy much bigger. The problem has been with the buyouts being funded by debt and the purchase of players at a very high price. 
     

    Does the EPL need a restructuring?

    No. Some clubs need probably restructuring but the EPL is a profitable business. The supporters of several clubs would like new owners (Manchester United, Liverpool). Overtime, I suspect and hope that we will see more clubs owned by supporter‘s trusts, similar to the Barcelona model.