Tag: Diggaj Pathak

  • Digicable part pays dues to MediaPro

    Digicable part pays dues to MediaPro

    NEW DELHI: Digicable Network India Pvt. Ltd has handed over three post-dated cheques for Rs 25 lakh each as part of the total payment of Rs 9.52 crore to MediaPro Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd.

    The cheques were accepted by MediaPro counsel Tejveer Singh Bhatia “without prejudice to his rights and contentions” in the presence of member B B Srivastava of the Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) on 9 August 2016.

    But Bhatia said in the event of any of the cheques not being honoured for payment, the Tribunal may seriously consider attachment of the judgment debtor’s headend.

    The cheques dated 16 August 2016, 31 August 2016 and 30 September 2016 were handed over by Digicable Network counsel Diggaj Pathak.

    The matter was listed for 14 September 2016 by which time additional cheques as well as the revised schedule, if any, for expeditious liquidation of the decretal amount would also be given, the Tribunal said.

  • Digicable part pays dues to MediaPro

    Digicable part pays dues to MediaPro

    NEW DELHI: Digicable Network India Pvt. Ltd has handed over three post-dated cheques for Rs 25 lakh each as part of the total payment of Rs 9.52 crore to MediaPro Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd.

    The cheques were accepted by MediaPro counsel Tejveer Singh Bhatia “without prejudice to his rights and contentions” in the presence of member B B Srivastava of the Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) on 9 August 2016.

    But Bhatia said in the event of any of the cheques not being honoured for payment, the Tribunal may seriously consider attachment of the judgment debtor’s headend.

    The cheques dated 16 August 2016, 31 August 2016 and 30 September 2016 were handed over by Digicable Network counsel Diggaj Pathak.

    The matter was listed for 14 September 2016 by which time additional cheques as well as the revised schedule, if any, for expeditious liquidation of the decretal amount would also be given, the Tribunal said.

  • TDSAT gives final chance to Digicable to commence payment to Media Pro

    TDSAT gives final chance to Digicable to commence payment to Media Pro

    NEW DELHI: The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Arbitration Tribunal asked DigicableNetwork India Pvt. Ltd “by way of last indulgence” to “inform and come with the cheque of theamount it is willing to pay upfront” to Media Pro Enterprise (I) Pvt. Ltd.

    Noting that the submission of Digicable Counsel Diggaj Pathak cannot be termed as “significantamount”, Media Pro counsel Tejveer Singh Bhatia said the Tribunal had itself said on 3 June 2016 that if the MSO did not come up with a significant amount, its property should be attached.

    He therefore submitted that the headends owned and operated by Digicable should be attached.

    Digicable Counsel Diggaj Pathak said his client was willing to pay the decretal amount and presented before the Tribunal a schedule for clearing the total of Rs 9.52 crore in fourteen installments between 31 August 2016 and 31 July 2017.

    The matter has now been listed for 29 July 2016.

  • TDSAT gives final chance to Digicable to commence payment to Media Pro

    TDSAT gives final chance to Digicable to commence payment to Media Pro

    NEW DELHI: The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Arbitration Tribunal asked DigicableNetwork India Pvt. Ltd “by way of last indulgence” to “inform and come with the cheque of theamount it is willing to pay upfront” to Media Pro Enterprise (I) Pvt. Ltd.

    Noting that the submission of Digicable Counsel Diggaj Pathak cannot be termed as “significantamount”, Media Pro counsel Tejveer Singh Bhatia said the Tribunal had itself said on 3 June 2016 that if the MSO did not come up with a significant amount, its property should be attached.

    He therefore submitted that the headends owned and operated by Digicable should be attached.

    Digicable Counsel Diggaj Pathak said his client was willing to pay the decretal amount and presented before the Tribunal a schedule for clearing the total of Rs 9.52 crore in fourteen installments between 31 August 2016 and 31 July 2017.

    The matter has now been listed for 29 July 2016.

  • TDSAT to examine Patna MSO’s allegations over LCOs shift

    TDSAT to examine Patna MSO’s allegations over LCOs shift

    NEW DELHI: The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Arbitration Tribunal (TDSAT) has appointed an Advocate Commissioner to probe allegations made by Patna-based multi-system operator (MSO) Siti Maurya Cable Network that seven local cable operators (LCOs) have been trying to migrate to another MSO.

     

    The Commissioner Diggaj Pathak will be given a list of subscribers by D K Classic, one of the LCOs. Pathak will then go to Patna unannounced and intimate the two sides about his arrival.

     

    Along with the representatives of the MSO and the LCO, Pathak will make random visits to some of the subscribers to see whether or not the set top boxes (STBs) of the petitioner are functional at their places. In case the petitioner’s STBs at the respondent’s subscribers’ place are found to be switched off, he will find out the duration since the signal switch off. Pathak will also ascertain whether the switch off was done from the MSO’s head-end or the LCO’s.

     

    Pathak will submit the report by 28 August. He will be paid an honorarium of Rs 15,000 per day, apart from actual expenses, to be shared equally by both sides. The matter will now be heard on 3 September.   

     

    After hearing the allegations of the MSO, TDSAT chairman Aftab Alam and members Kuldip Singh and B B Srivastava were told by D K Classic that it was the MSO, which had switched off its signals. However, the MSO alleged in its petition that the LCOs had neither given the statutory notice, nor returned the STBs.

     

    Sharath Sampath, who represents D K Classic, said the LCOs did not migrate to another MSO of their own volition and initiative but Siti Maurya disconnected the supply of its signals, compelling them to take signals from another MSO. He also alleged that if his client D K Classic’s share in the carriage fee is taken into account, not only will there be no dues payable but the LCO will be entitled to receive some payments from the Siti Maurya.