Tag: Depreciation

  • RCOM reports mixed Q2 amid insolvency struggles

    RCOM reports mixed Q2 amid insolvency struggles

    Mumbai: In the latest financial disclosure, Reliance Communications Limited (RCOM) reported its unaudited standalone and consolidated financial results for the quarter and half-year ending 30 September 2024. The announcement, dated 9 November 2024, was made under the oversight of the resolution professional, Anish Niranjan Nanavaty, as the company remains under corporate insolvency resolution since 28 June 2019.

    For the quarter ending 30 September 2024, RCOM’s consolidated total income stood at Rs 97 crore, reflecting a slight decrease from Rs 100 crore in the previous quarter. The company reported an operating loss of Rs 32 crore, widening from a loss of Rs 19 crore in the preceding quarter. The net loss for the quarter was Rs 1,060 crore, an improvement from the Rs 1,965 crore loss reported in the previous quarter.  

    The operating margin for the quarter was -32.99 per cent, compared to -19 per cent in the previous quarter, indicating increased operational challenges. The depreciation and amortisation expenses rose to Rs 34 crore from Rs 32 crore, suggesting ongoing capital expenditure and asset utilisation.

    Since the initiation of the insolvency process in June 2019, RCOM has faced multiple operational and structural obstacles, with the National Company Law Tribunal overseeing its recovery and management efforts. The impact of these challenges is evident in the subdued financial performance across segments. Cost-cutting initiatives, though visible, remain inadequate to counterbalance the income reductions from discontinued services and stagnant growth.

    As RCOM pivots its strategy to maximise value during insolvency proceedings, its existing customer base and asset utilisation are pivotal to short-term stabilisation. Nonetheless, substantial debt obligations and restricted access to capital raise questions about RCOM’s capability to weather the long-term implications of market pressures without a viable merger or acquisition plan.

    Key Financial Highlights

    •    Total Income: Rs 97 crore (Q2 FY2024-25)

        Operating Loss: Rs 32 crore

        Net Loss: Rs 1,060 crore

        Operating Margin: -32.99 per cent

        Depreciation/Amortisation: Rs 34 crore

    These figures reflect the company’s ongoing efforts to manage its financial health amid challenging circumstances.

    The future trajectory of RCOM hinges largely on its restructuring efforts and external support from potential investors. While the telecom industry’s competitive intensity shows no signs of abating, any potential buyer would inherit both the legacy issues and opportunities presented by RCOM’s extensive infrastructure. Stakeholders continue to monitor how RCOM will leverage or offload these assets within the constraints of its insolvency resolution process.

     

  • Zee Business launches new series ‘Rupee Ki Paathshala’ on financial education

    Zee Business launches new series ‘Rupee Ki Paathshala’ on financial education

    Mumbai: What is common to Mad Money with Jim Cramer, The Profit, Shark Tank, and Rupee Ki Paathshala? Well, you guessed it right – these are some shows which cater to the diverse nuances of the financial spectrum, namely, analysing stocks, the financial markets, investments, and even entrepreneurship. Rupee Ki Paathshala is a new show which has been launched by Zee Business, one of India’s most viewed business channels.

    This programme will be a part of a series called Paathshala, which promises to keep its viewers updated on various developments in the financial markets in a unique and simple manner.

    This new show by the media giant will discuss the latest developments in the currency world where there is a huge fall in the rupee vs US dollar trading, and this has surprised everyone from the government to the market pundits. The rupee has depreciated nearly 8 per cent against the dollar in the same year. At such a time, there comes a question: why has there been such a commotion due to the huge depreciation of the rupee? How does the rupee fall? How does the rupee rise? How does the fall and rise of the rupee affect our lives? Where does rupee trading take place? Why is the value of the rupee generally seen in comparison to the dollar prominently? Rupee Ki Paathshala will be the one-stop shop for all such questions and will be hosted by Zee Business managing editor Anil Singhvi.

    Speaking of Rupee Ki Paathshala, Singhvi said, “The rupee is falling day by day. On Monday, it fell to the level of 80 for the first time against the dollar. It has now hit its all-time low and breached the psychological mark of 80 per dollar, and hence it becomes necessary to bring to our audience a show that will explain in a distinctive way what the ABCD of the currency market is and why the rupee is falling against the dollar.”

  • Network 18 PAT at Rs 114 million

    Network 18 PAT at Rs 114 million

    MUMBAI: Network18 Media & Investments (Network18) reported a marked improvement in its numbers for the quarter ended 31 December 2017. The consolidated revenue (net of revenue from joint ventures and associates) for the company declined marginally by 1.8 per cent year-on-year (yoy) to Rs 3660 million.

    With lower distribution and business promotion expenses, the company reported earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of Rs 77 million as against EBITDA loss of Rs 130 million in Q3FY18. Though other income grew significantly, the decline in EBITDA and higher tax outgo weighed down PAT. The company reported PAT of Rs 114 million against loss of Rs 778 million in the same quarter last year. 

    Network18 posted consolidated revenue of Rs 9690 million (including a proportionate share of JVs) in Q3 FY18, a 7 per cent yoy growth. The revival in growth in the broadcasting business was partially offset by a pullback in the TV shopping business.

    Media operations revenue (including a proportionate share of JVs) grew by 7.6 per cent yoy to Rs 9595 million. Revenue from film production segment declined by 18.0 per cent yoy to Rs 153 million.

    Led by cost control in TV shopping, margins of the broadcasting segment improved, thereby leading to a reduction in EBIT loss for the media operations segment to Rs317 million against EBIT loss of Rs778 million in Q3FY17. 

    Also Read:

    Network18 Digital hires Saregama’s Mudaliar as chief product officer

    GST ad deferrals hit Network 18 revenue in Q1-18

    Network18 emerges as the most viewed news network on youtube in india

  • Q2-17: Radio Mirchi revenue up 11.5 per cent

    Q2-17: Radio Mirchi revenue up 11.5 per cent

    BENGALURU: Indian private FM player Entertainment Network (India) Limited (ENIL), which runs the Mirchi brand radio network in India,  reported 11.5 per cent increase in total Income from operations (TIO) for the quarter ended 30 September 2016 (Q2-17, current quarter). The company reported consolidated revenue of Rs 129.65 crore for the current quarter as compared to Rs 116.27 crore in the corresponding quarter of the previous fiscal. Quarter-on-quarter (q-o-q), revenue in Q2-17 also increased 17.1 per cent from Rs 110.76 crore in Q1-17.

    The company’s consolidated profit after tax (PAT) in Q2-17 declined by 70.3 per cent year-over-year (y-o-y) to Rs 8.05 crore (16.2 per cent margin) as compared to Rs 27.14 crore (23.3 per cent margin) and declined 51.7 per cent q-o-q from Rs 16.66 crore (15 per cent margin).

    Company Speak

    Commenting on the results, ENIL managing director and chief executive officer, Prashant Panday said, “It’s been a busy quarter for us! We are in the midst of many exciting launches; of core brand Mirchi in cities like Chandigarh, Guwahati and Kochi and our second brand, Mirchi Love in Ahmedabad, Surat, Jaipur and Lucknow. We are offering new innovative content and recruiting existing and new listeners. We have stepped up marketing spends and early research indicates that we have made a strong start and in fact have become leaders in key markets. I am confident this will translate into a stronger business in the years ahead!”

    A look at the other numbers reported by Radio Mirchi

    ENIL’s consolidated Earnings before Interest, Depreciation, Taxes and Amortisation (EBIDTA, operating profit) for Q2-17 declined 39 per cent y-o-y to Rs 23.13 crore (17.8 per cent margin)  from Rs 37.94 crore (32.6 per cent margin) and declined 21.4 per cent q-o-q from Q1-17 at Rs 29.44 crore (26.6 per cent margin).

    ENIL total expense (TE) in Q2-17 increased 36.1 per cent y-o-y to Rs 120.50 crore (92.9 per cent of TIO) from Rs 88.57 crore (76.2 per cent of TIO), and increased 34.2 per cent q-o-q from Rs 89.79 crore (81.1 per cent of TIO).

    Programming and royalty expenses in the current quarter increased 42.9 per cent y-o-y to Rs 6.03 crore (4.6 per cent of TIO) from Rs 34.22 crore (3.6 per cent of TIO and increased 14.6 perc ent q-o-q from Rs 5.26 crore (4.7 per cent of TIO).

    License fee in Q2-17 increased 6.1 per cent y-o-y to Rs 8.31 crore (6.4 per cent of TIO) from Rs 7.83 crore (6.7 per cent of TIO) and increased 20.9 per cent q-o-q from Rs 6.87 crore (6.2 per cent of TIO).

    Employee Benefit Expense (EBE) in Q2-17 at Rs 26.86 crore (20.7 per cent of TIO) increased 21.7 per cent y-o-y from Rs 22.08 crore (19.0 per cent of TIO) and increased 6.6 per cent q-o-q from Rs 25.20 crore (22.8 per cent of TIO).

    Marketing expense in Q2-17 at Rs 32.58 crore (25.1 per cent of TIO) more than doubled (2.1 times) y-o-y and q-o-q from Rs 15.47 crore (13.3 per cent of TIO) and from Rs 11.29 crore (11.1  per cent of TIO) respectively.

    Other expenses in Q2-17 at Rs 32.73 crore (25.3 per cent of TIO) increased 13.9 per cent y-o-y from Rs 28.73 crore (24.7 per cent of TIO), and increased 14 per cent q-o-q from Rs 28.71 crore (25.9 per cent of TIO).

    ENIL won 17 stations in Phase 3 auctions and has launched four new stations in the current quarter – at Chandigarh, Ahmedabad, Surat and Jaipur. Earlier the company had launched Bengaluru, Guwahati, Hyderabad and Kochi stations. Bengaluru was Radio Mirchi’s first launch in the second frequencies network.

    Note: The unit of currency in this report is the Indian rupee – Rs (also conventionally represented by INR). The Indian numbering system or the Vedic numbering system has been used to denote money values. The basic conversion to the international norm would be:

    (a) 100,00,000 = 100 lakh = 10,000,000 = 10 million = 1 crore.

    (b) 10,000 lakh = 100 crore = 1 arab = 1 billion.

  • Q2-17: Radio Mirchi revenue up 11.5 per cent

    Q2-17: Radio Mirchi revenue up 11.5 per cent

    BENGALURU: Indian private FM player Entertainment Network (India) Limited (ENIL), which runs the Mirchi brand radio network in India,  reported 11.5 per cent increase in total Income from operations (TIO) for the quarter ended 30 September 2016 (Q2-17, current quarter). The company reported consolidated revenue of Rs 129.65 crore for the current quarter as compared to Rs 116.27 crore in the corresponding quarter of the previous fiscal. Quarter-on-quarter (q-o-q), revenue in Q2-17 also increased 17.1 per cent from Rs 110.76 crore in Q1-17.

    The company’s consolidated profit after tax (PAT) in Q2-17 declined by 70.3 per cent year-over-year (y-o-y) to Rs 8.05 crore (16.2 per cent margin) as compared to Rs 27.14 crore (23.3 per cent margin) and declined 51.7 per cent q-o-q from Rs 16.66 crore (15 per cent margin).

    Company Speak

    Commenting on the results, ENIL managing director and chief executive officer, Prashant Panday said, “It’s been a busy quarter for us! We are in the midst of many exciting launches; of core brand Mirchi in cities like Chandigarh, Guwahati and Kochi and our second brand, Mirchi Love in Ahmedabad, Surat, Jaipur and Lucknow. We are offering new innovative content and recruiting existing and new listeners. We have stepped up marketing spends and early research indicates that we have made a strong start and in fact have become leaders in key markets. I am confident this will translate into a stronger business in the years ahead!”

    A look at the other numbers reported by Radio Mirchi

    ENIL’s consolidated Earnings before Interest, Depreciation, Taxes and Amortisation (EBIDTA, operating profit) for Q2-17 declined 39 per cent y-o-y to Rs 23.13 crore (17.8 per cent margin)  from Rs 37.94 crore (32.6 per cent margin) and declined 21.4 per cent q-o-q from Q1-17 at Rs 29.44 crore (26.6 per cent margin).

    ENIL total expense (TE) in Q2-17 increased 36.1 per cent y-o-y to Rs 120.50 crore (92.9 per cent of TIO) from Rs 88.57 crore (76.2 per cent of TIO), and increased 34.2 per cent q-o-q from Rs 89.79 crore (81.1 per cent of TIO).

    Programming and royalty expenses in the current quarter increased 42.9 per cent y-o-y to Rs 6.03 crore (4.6 per cent of TIO) from Rs 34.22 crore (3.6 per cent of TIO and increased 14.6 perc ent q-o-q from Rs 5.26 crore (4.7 per cent of TIO).

    License fee in Q2-17 increased 6.1 per cent y-o-y to Rs 8.31 crore (6.4 per cent of TIO) from Rs 7.83 crore (6.7 per cent of TIO) and increased 20.9 per cent q-o-q from Rs 6.87 crore (6.2 per cent of TIO).

    Employee Benefit Expense (EBE) in Q2-17 at Rs 26.86 crore (20.7 per cent of TIO) increased 21.7 per cent y-o-y from Rs 22.08 crore (19.0 per cent of TIO) and increased 6.6 per cent q-o-q from Rs 25.20 crore (22.8 per cent of TIO).

    Marketing expense in Q2-17 at Rs 32.58 crore (25.1 per cent of TIO) more than doubled (2.1 times) y-o-y and q-o-q from Rs 15.47 crore (13.3 per cent of TIO) and from Rs 11.29 crore (11.1  per cent of TIO) respectively.

    Other expenses in Q2-17 at Rs 32.73 crore (25.3 per cent of TIO) increased 13.9 per cent y-o-y from Rs 28.73 crore (24.7 per cent of TIO), and increased 14 per cent q-o-q from Rs 28.71 crore (25.9 per cent of TIO).

    ENIL won 17 stations in Phase 3 auctions and has launched four new stations in the current quarter – at Chandigarh, Ahmedabad, Surat and Jaipur. Earlier the company had launched Bengaluru, Guwahati, Hyderabad and Kochi stations. Bengaluru was Radio Mirchi’s first launch in the second frequencies network.

    Note: The unit of currency in this report is the Indian rupee – Rs (also conventionally represented by INR). The Indian numbering system or the Vedic numbering system has been used to denote money values. The basic conversion to the international norm would be:

    (a) 100,00,000 = 100 lakh = 10,000,000 = 10 million = 1 crore.

    (b) 10,000 lakh = 100 crore = 1 arab = 1 billion.

  • FICCI demands infrastructure status for broadcast industry in pre-budget memo

    FICCI demands infrastructure status for broadcast industry in pre-budget memo

    NEW DELHI: The Indian broadcast, cable and direct-to-home (DTH) sectors have been demanding a infrastructure status for the industry as well as seeking all benefits and incentives available for the infrastructure industry including the availability of finance at a concessional rate.

     

    To this effect, the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) had earlier this month urged the Union Government to grant “Infrastructure Status” to the broadcasting industry.

     

    Now, making this demand, the Entertainment Wing of FICCI has said in a pre-budget memorandum to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley that the sector should be allowed tax concessions as per Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act.

     

    The digitisation process and the deployment of set top boxes (STBs) are heavy capital oriented and thus require huge investments, which may force various amalgamations and thus they should be allowed to set off accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation allowances to be carried forward as per Section 72 A of the Act, the industry body said.

     

    Parity with Manufacturing Industry under Section 72A of the Act

     

    It also said that the disparity between the service and the manufacturing sector is very adversely affecting the growth and consolidation of the Service sector.

     

    The tax benefits under Section 72A of the Act in respect of amalgamation or de-merger (carry forward and set off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation allowances) are currently limited to industrial undertakings or a ship, hotel, aircraft or banking. The definition of industrial undertaking should be widened to include service industry, broadcasters and content production companies.

     

    Rationalisation of Indirect taxes

     

    The rate of taxes, which range from 30 – 70 per cent, especially the entertainment tax imposed by the states, over and above the service tax, are punitive in nature, FICCI said, adding that such punitive level of taxation incentivises unhealthy practices, such as piracy, revenue leakage on account of under reporting of revenues, etc. It is important that the overall taxation level is brought down for the sector as a whole.

     

    State Entertainment tax legislations levy high taxes on the subscription earned by cable operators and DTH operators. The non-availability of credit of central taxes against the state taxes and vice versa increases the tax burden on the entertainment industry. In addition to this, the Central Government has levied service tax at 14 per cent on the transfer of copyrights, which is already being taxed as ‘goods’ under the various state VAT legislations.

     

    Payment for Content Production

     

    FICCI said there is ambiguity since the tax authorities have been adopting a view that the payment towards production of content is in the nature of fees for technical services and subject to tax at the rate of 10 per cent under section 194J of the Act whereas Explanation III to section 194C of the Act clarifies that payments made towards a contract, concerning broadcasting and telecasting including production of programmes for such broadcasting or telecasting, would fall under the definition of ‘work’ for the purpose of section 194C of the Act.

     

    It suggested that to avoid difference in positions adopted by the tax payer and tax department on applicability of relevant section and to mitigate resultant litigation and hardship, a clarification may be issued regarding appropriate classification of content production services and applicability of relevant section for withholding of taxes.

     

    Carriage Fees/Placement Charges

     

    FICCI has demanded that the Government should provide a clarification that the payments made towards carriage fees are not in the nature of royalty or fees for technical services and TDS is required to be made on such payments as per section 194C of the Act.

     

    It said that the tax department is contending that since cable operators are providing technical services, payments made towards placement of channels is subject to TDS under section 194J of the Act.

     

    Broadcasters pay placement or carriage fee to the cable and DTH operators to place their channel in prime bands, which in turn enhances the viewership of the channel. Such charges are paid under a contract merely for placing the channel on agreed frequency bands.

     

    Deduction of tax at source under Section 194H on the “15% agency commission”

     

    FICCI recommended a clarification that no taxes need to be deducted at source by broadcasters on the “15 per cent agency commission” as mentioned in the invoice raised by broadcasters to advertisement agency or advertisers.

     

    FICCI said the 15 per cent agency commission mentioned by broadcasters in its invoices for ad airtime sale raised on ad agency or advertisers is merely a presentation in the invoices and not a real transaction. Neither the broadcasters nor ad agency recognises the same as revenue or expense. It is customary in nature, as is also evident from the fact that even on the invoices raised directly on advertisers; the said 15 per cent agency commission appears.

     

    Broadcasters are not supposed to make any payments towards 15 per cent agency commission mentioned in the invoice, as there is no agreement or arrangement to pay such the commission with ad agencies or advertisers. In fact, broadcasters do not make any payment in respect of the said commission mentioned on the invoices.

     

    At the outset, FICCI said that the Indian media and entertainment industry grew from Rs 918 billion in 2013 to Rs 1026 billion in 2014, registering an overall growth of 11.7 per cent. The industry is estimated to achieve a growth rate of 13 per cent in 2015 to touch Rs 1159 billion. The sector is projected to grow at a healthy CAGR of 13.9 per cent to reach Rs 1964 billion by 2019.

     

    As per FICCI, television clearly continues to be the dominant segment but strong growth had been posted by new media sectors. Gaming and digital advertising recorded a strong growth of 22.4 per cent and 44.5 per cent compared to the previous year.

     

    The benefits of Phase I and II of cable digital addressable system (DAS) rollout, and continued Phase III rollout are expected to contribute significantly to strong continued growth in the TV sector revenues and its ability to invest in and monetise content. The sector is expected to grow at a CAGR of 15.5 per cent over the period 2015-2019.

     

    Tax Exemptions for Radio Broadcasting

     

    While noting that radio is anticipated to see a spurt in growth after rollout of FM Phase III licensing, FICCI asked the Government to consider providing tax holiday of five years for new capital investment in Phase III; reduce customs duty on capital equipment for radio broadcasting to four per cent; and consider service tax exemption for billings to service recipients covered in the negative list.

     

    Tax Holiday for five years for setting up of new screens

     

    Noting that the film sector had shown a minimal growth of 0.9 per cent in 2014 over 2013, FICCI said there had been an increase in piracy, since the number of screens for viewing films had not increased in proportion to the increase in number of films and the number of people viewing these films.

     

    FICCI said that it was essential to extend the benefit to cinema owners in terms of 80-IB of the Act to multiplexes constructed after March 2005 to encourage the set-up of multiplexes and thereby improve the density of cinema houses in the country. This will encourage setting up of new screens in India and help in improving screen density.

     

    Reduction of prescribed time limit under Rule 9A and 9B

     

    FICCI suggested that the existing period of 90 days before end of the financial year (under Rule 9A and 9B of IT Rules) is suitably reduced to grant relief to assessees whose feature films have incurred losses and have been released for exhibition in the last quarter of the financial year.

     

    Under Rule 9A of the Income Tax Rules, if a film producer sells all rights of exhibition of his feature film, the entire cost of production is allowed as a deduction in computing the profits and gains of such previous year.

     

    However, if the film producer does not sell all rights of exhibition of his film, it is released for exhibition on a commercial basis at least 90 days before end of the financial year and the film producer is eligible to claim deduction of the entire cost of production. Otherwise, a feature film is released for exhibition on a commercial basis within a period 90 days before end of the financial year and the producer is eligible to claim deduction of cost of production only up to a ceiling limit and any excess cost of production is carried forward to the next financial year. This ceiling limit is the amount of revenues generated by the feature film in the financial year.

     

    In certain cases where not all rights of exhibition of a feature film are sold and it is released for exhibition on a commercial basis within 90 days before end of the financial year, the feature film performs poorly and it is exhibited only for a short duration. Consequently, the film producer may not recover costs. In such cases in view of the prevailing IT Rules, the film producers are unable to claim a deduction of entire production cost and, the loss is to be carried forward to the next financial year. Accordingly, such film producers are unable to claim losses in the year the feature film is released for exhibition despite no further scope of income. A similar situation exists in the case of expenditure of distribution rights in view of Rule 9B of IT Rules.

     

    Exemption of Service Tax on major inputs/input services

     

    FICCI recommended that major inputs / input services that are used in relation to theatrical rights in movies, be exempted from service tax. Since the major inputs/input services used in relation to revenue earned from theatrical rights are taxable, the CENVAT credit of service tax paid on such inputs/input services is blocked in the supply chain due to applicability of CCR. Eventually such taxes result in increase of the cost of production thereby defeating the purpose of providing an exemption on the output service.

     

    Re-instatement of the Service Tax exemption on Transmission of digital cinema

     

    FICCI also recommended reinstating the exemption to digital cinema service distributors, as it existed earlier under notification 12/2007 ST of 1 March, 2007, which had been rescinded with the introduction of the negative list.

     

    Service tax on transmission of digital cinema is a direct cost to the producers since the same is in relation to theatrical exhibition of cinematograph film (which is an exempt service with effect from 1 April, 2013) and hence no credit can be availed of such service tax.

     

    Clarity on export status of post-production services

     

    FICCI asked for clarity on the inclusion of post-production activities in the exclusion to this Rule. Alternatively, the second proviso to the Rule 4(a) of the POPS Rules be re-worded.

     

    Given the various technological advances in the Indian film industry, many Indian entities are hired by foreign producers for carrying post production activity. For such activities, the content is temporarily imported into India (either physically or electronically) and re-exported after completion of service. Post-production activities, which may be performed in India, do not find explicit mention in the proviso that carves out exceptions to the performance based rule in POPS Rules.

     

    Service Tax exemption to on-screen advertising in cinemas

     

    The industry body said on-screen advertising in cinemas and multiplexes should be exempted from levy of service tax.

     

    After 1 October, 2014, the negative list of services was amended and on-screen advertising within cinemas is liable to service tax.

     

    The on-screen advertising within cinemas caters to advertisers with small businesses, with limited resources. For large advertisers, on-screen advertising is a secondary medium of advertising at best and they have a small contribution to onscreen advertising within cinemas. The on-screen advertising forms an important source of revenue for the exhibitors, which are already reeling under the pressure of multiple taxes. Re-instatement of service tax on such revenue will only increase their tax burden.

     

    Applicability of Service Tax on food and beverages sold within Cinemas

     

    The food and beverages (F&B) sold in theatres during movies are subject to VAT under local state laws and the same is paid by the exhibitors. But with effect from 1 April, 2011, restaurant services became taxable whereby services rendered by any air-conditioned restaurant serving alcohol were made liable to service tax and later with effect from 2013 the condition of serving alcohol was withdrawn. However, it is still not clear whether the sale of F&B by cinema halls and multiplexes is covered in this service.

     

    Unlike restaurants, there is no seating arrangement, no cutlery is provided and no waiter serves F&B and hence there is no element of service involved in any meaningful manner.

     

    FICCI said levy of service tax is intended on “restaurants” rendering certain services and is not intended on sale of food, beverage and snacks from candy counters in cinema theatres.

     

    Service Tax exemption on entry to award functions, musical performance etc.

     

    The Union Budget of 2015 had amended the negative list of services and effectively withdrawn the unconditional service tax exemption, which was granted to tickets for award functions, music events, sports events etc. With effect from June 2015, service tax is payable when the consideration for admission to entertainment events such as award function, concert, pageant, sporting event etc. is more than Rs 500 per person.

     

    However, FICCI said payment for admission to any event is already liable to a high state entertainment tax and levying of a service tax of 14 per cent over and above the high rates of entertainment imposes a high burden on the entertainment sector.

     

    The industry body asked for a clarification to specify that the value of ticket for the purpose of levy of service tax on such admission (where the ticket price is more than Rs 500) should be the value excluding Entertainment tax. It also wanted clarification on if service tax is payable, the same should be computed on a value exclusive of Entertainment tax and accordingly no service tax should apply on entertainment tax amount.

     

    Customs Duty exemption on film equipment under the ATA Carnet

     

    The ATA Carnet permits duty free temporary admission of goods into a member country. The list of exempted products covers filming equipment too. However, there is no Customs Notification in order to exempt the import of filming equipment from the levy of Customs Duty, on the lines of the ATA Carnet.

     

    FICCI recommended that Customs Duty should be exempted on film equipment under ATA Carnet. The film production equipment is very expensive and not easily available in all countries because of which the film producers are compelled to temporarily import the same on lease for the purpose of producing the film. In absence of a customs notification to exempt filming equipment, the ATA Carnet duty exemption benefit cannot be extended to import of filming equipment.

    These imports significantly increase the burden of tax on the film producers.

     

    Proposals for Animation, Gaming and VFX Industries

     

    FICCI also made some recommendations for the Animation, Gaming & Visual Effects (VFX) industries.

     

    It asked for a 10-year tax holiday for the Animation, Gaming, and VFX industries; and removal of withholding tax on revenues accruing from sales of mobile games in non-India markets as well as removal of withholding tax on the development contracts given to mobile game developers outside India.

     

    FICCI also asked for removal of withholding tax paid by expats working in India for Indian mobile game development companies.

     

    The Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) applicability for units undertaking animation work in SEZ should be withdrawn to encourage export of animated contents.

     

    The industry body wanted restoration of STPI advantage scheme for AVGC or ITES for another 10 to 20 years and cover/encourage exports as well as IP creation.

     

    To promote domestic gaming market, excise duty on local manufacture should be brought down to nil (similar to film and music industry). This will enable CVD to be brought to zero also. The effective reduction in taxes would be around 15 per cent. Import duty on consoles (gaming hardware) to be brought down to zero per cent to increase the installed base to enable the local developer ecosystem to flourish.

     

    There should be a provision of 50 per cent reimbursable MDA (Market Development Assistance) for travel and registration fees to international market events.

     

    The Government should extend support under Market Development Assistance (MDA) activity for Indian companies to exhibit by setting Indian Pavilions in the world markets. What is needed is to help bringing local production companies to international markets, collect and disseminate information and support creating the infrastructure needed for a healthy media market to develop.

  • FICCI demands infrastructure status for broadcast industry in pre-budget memo

    FICCI demands infrastructure status for broadcast industry in pre-budget memo

    NEW DELHI: The Indian broadcast, cable and direct-to-home (DTH) sectors have been demanding a infrastructure status for the industry as well as seeking all benefits and incentives available for the infrastructure industry including the availability of finance at a concessional rate.

     

    To this effect, the Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) had earlier this month urged the Union Government to grant “Infrastructure Status” to the broadcasting industry.

     

    Now, making this demand, the Entertainment Wing of FICCI has said in a pre-budget memorandum to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley that the sector should be allowed tax concessions as per Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act.

     

    The digitisation process and the deployment of set top boxes (STBs) are heavy capital oriented and thus require huge investments, which may force various amalgamations and thus they should be allowed to set off accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation allowances to be carried forward as per Section 72 A of the Act, the industry body said.

     

    Parity with Manufacturing Industry under Section 72A of the Act

     

    It also said that the disparity between the service and the manufacturing sector is very adversely affecting the growth and consolidation of the Service sector.

     

    The tax benefits under Section 72A of the Act in respect of amalgamation or de-merger (carry forward and set off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation allowances) are currently limited to industrial undertakings or a ship, hotel, aircraft or banking. The definition of industrial undertaking should be widened to include service industry, broadcasters and content production companies.

     

    Rationalisation of Indirect taxes

     

    The rate of taxes, which range from 30 – 70 per cent, especially the entertainment tax imposed by the states, over and above the service tax, are punitive in nature, FICCI said, adding that such punitive level of taxation incentivises unhealthy practices, such as piracy, revenue leakage on account of under reporting of revenues, etc. It is important that the overall taxation level is brought down for the sector as a whole.

     

    State Entertainment tax legislations levy high taxes on the subscription earned by cable operators and DTH operators. The non-availability of credit of central taxes against the state taxes and vice versa increases the tax burden on the entertainment industry. In addition to this, the Central Government has levied service tax at 14 per cent on the transfer of copyrights, which is already being taxed as ‘goods’ under the various state VAT legislations.

     

    Payment for Content Production

     

    FICCI said there is ambiguity since the tax authorities have been adopting a view that the payment towards production of content is in the nature of fees for technical services and subject to tax at the rate of 10 per cent under section 194J of the Act whereas Explanation III to section 194C of the Act clarifies that payments made towards a contract, concerning broadcasting and telecasting including production of programmes for such broadcasting or telecasting, would fall under the definition of ‘work’ for the purpose of section 194C of the Act.

     

    It suggested that to avoid difference in positions adopted by the tax payer and tax department on applicability of relevant section and to mitigate resultant litigation and hardship, a clarification may be issued regarding appropriate classification of content production services and applicability of relevant section for withholding of taxes.

     

    Carriage Fees/Placement Charges

     

    FICCI has demanded that the Government should provide a clarification that the payments made towards carriage fees are not in the nature of royalty or fees for technical services and TDS is required to be made on such payments as per section 194C of the Act.

     

    It said that the tax department is contending that since cable operators are providing technical services, payments made towards placement of channels is subject to TDS under section 194J of the Act.

     

    Broadcasters pay placement or carriage fee to the cable and DTH operators to place their channel in prime bands, which in turn enhances the viewership of the channel. Such charges are paid under a contract merely for placing the channel on agreed frequency bands.

     

    Deduction of tax at source under Section 194H on the “15% agency commission”

     

    FICCI recommended a clarification that no taxes need to be deducted at source by broadcasters on the “15 per cent agency commission” as mentioned in the invoice raised by broadcasters to advertisement agency or advertisers.

     

    FICCI said the 15 per cent agency commission mentioned by broadcasters in its invoices for ad airtime sale raised on ad agency or advertisers is merely a presentation in the invoices and not a real transaction. Neither the broadcasters nor ad agency recognises the same as revenue or expense. It is customary in nature, as is also evident from the fact that even on the invoices raised directly on advertisers; the said 15 per cent agency commission appears.

     

    Broadcasters are not supposed to make any payments towards 15 per cent agency commission mentioned in the invoice, as there is no agreement or arrangement to pay such the commission with ad agencies or advertisers. In fact, broadcasters do not make any payment in respect of the said commission mentioned on the invoices.

     

    At the outset, FICCI said that the Indian media and entertainment industry grew from Rs 918 billion in 2013 to Rs 1026 billion in 2014, registering an overall growth of 11.7 per cent. The industry is estimated to achieve a growth rate of 13 per cent in 2015 to touch Rs 1159 billion. The sector is projected to grow at a healthy CAGR of 13.9 per cent to reach Rs 1964 billion by 2019.

     

    As per FICCI, television clearly continues to be the dominant segment but strong growth had been posted by new media sectors. Gaming and digital advertising recorded a strong growth of 22.4 per cent and 44.5 per cent compared to the previous year.

     

    The benefits of Phase I and II of cable digital addressable system (DAS) rollout, and continued Phase III rollout are expected to contribute significantly to strong continued growth in the TV sector revenues and its ability to invest in and monetise content. The sector is expected to grow at a CAGR of 15.5 per cent over the period 2015-2019.

     

    Tax Exemptions for Radio Broadcasting

     

    While noting that radio is anticipated to see a spurt in growth after rollout of FM Phase III licensing, FICCI asked the Government to consider providing tax holiday of five years for new capital investment in Phase III; reduce customs duty on capital equipment for radio broadcasting to four per cent; and consider service tax exemption for billings to service recipients covered in the negative list.

     

    Tax Holiday for five years for setting up of new screens

     

    Noting that the film sector had shown a minimal growth of 0.9 per cent in 2014 over 2013, FICCI said there had been an increase in piracy, since the number of screens for viewing films had not increased in proportion to the increase in number of films and the number of people viewing these films.

     

    FICCI said that it was essential to extend the benefit to cinema owners in terms of 80-IB of the Act to multiplexes constructed after March 2005 to encourage the set-up of multiplexes and thereby improve the density of cinema houses in the country. This will encourage setting up of new screens in India and help in improving screen density.

     

    Reduction of prescribed time limit under Rule 9A and 9B

     

    FICCI suggested that the existing period of 90 days before end of the financial year (under Rule 9A and 9B of IT Rules) is suitably reduced to grant relief to assessees whose feature films have incurred losses and have been released for exhibition in the last quarter of the financial year.

     

    Under Rule 9A of the Income Tax Rules, if a film producer sells all rights of exhibition of his feature film, the entire cost of production is allowed as a deduction in computing the profits and gains of such previous year.

     

    However, if the film producer does not sell all rights of exhibition of his film, it is released for exhibition on a commercial basis at least 90 days before end of the financial year and the film producer is eligible to claim deduction of the entire cost of production. Otherwise, a feature film is released for exhibition on a commercial basis within a period 90 days before end of the financial year and the producer is eligible to claim deduction of cost of production only up to a ceiling limit and any excess cost of production is carried forward to the next financial year. This ceiling limit is the amount of revenues generated by the feature film in the financial year.

     

    In certain cases where not all rights of exhibition of a feature film are sold and it is released for exhibition on a commercial basis within 90 days before end of the financial year, the feature film performs poorly and it is exhibited only for a short duration. Consequently, the film producer may not recover costs. In such cases in view of the prevailing IT Rules, the film producers are unable to claim a deduction of entire production cost and, the loss is to be carried forward to the next financial year. Accordingly, such film producers are unable to claim losses in the year the feature film is released for exhibition despite no further scope of income. A similar situation exists in the case of expenditure of distribution rights in view of Rule 9B of IT Rules.

     

    Exemption of Service Tax on major inputs/input services

     

    FICCI recommended that major inputs / input services that are used in relation to theatrical rights in movies, be exempted from service tax. Since the major inputs/input services used in relation to revenue earned from theatrical rights are taxable, the CENVAT credit of service tax paid on such inputs/input services is blocked in the supply chain due to applicability of CCR. Eventually such taxes result in increase of the cost of production thereby defeating the purpose of providing an exemption on the output service.

     

    Re-instatement of the Service Tax exemption on Transmission of digital cinema

     

    FICCI also recommended reinstating the exemption to digital cinema service distributors, as it existed earlier under notification 12/2007 ST of 1 March, 2007, which had been rescinded with the introduction of the negative list.

     

    Service tax on transmission of digital cinema is a direct cost to the producers since the same is in relation to theatrical exhibition of cinematograph film (which is an exempt service with effect from 1 April, 2013) and hence no credit can be availed of such service tax.

     

    Clarity on export status of post-production services

     

    FICCI asked for clarity on the inclusion of post-production activities in the exclusion to this Rule. Alternatively, the second proviso to the Rule 4(a) of the POPS Rules be re-worded.

     

    Given the various technological advances in the Indian film industry, many Indian entities are hired by foreign producers for carrying post production activity. For such activities, the content is temporarily imported into India (either physically or electronically) and re-exported after completion of service. Post-production activities, which may be performed in India, do not find explicit mention in the proviso that carves out exceptions to the performance based rule in POPS Rules.

     

    Service Tax exemption to on-screen advertising in cinemas

     

    The industry body said on-screen advertising in cinemas and multiplexes should be exempted from levy of service tax.

     

    After 1 October, 2014, the negative list of services was amended and on-screen advertising within cinemas is liable to service tax.

     

    The on-screen advertising within cinemas caters to advertisers with small businesses, with limited resources. For large advertisers, on-screen advertising is a secondary medium of advertising at best and they have a small contribution to onscreen advertising within cinemas. The on-screen advertising forms an important source of revenue for the exhibitors, which are already reeling under the pressure of multiple taxes. Re-instatement of service tax on such revenue will only increase their tax burden.

     

    Applicability of Service Tax on food and beverages sold within Cinemas

     

    The food and beverages (F&B) sold in theatres during movies are subject to VAT under local state laws and the same is paid by the exhibitors. But with effect from 1 April, 2011, restaurant services became taxable whereby services rendered by any air-conditioned restaurant serving alcohol were made liable to service tax and later with effect from 2013 the condition of serving alcohol was withdrawn. However, it is still not clear whether the sale of F&B by cinema halls and multiplexes is covered in this service.

     

    Unlike restaurants, there is no seating arrangement, no cutlery is provided and no waiter serves F&B and hence there is no element of service involved in any meaningful manner.

     

    FICCI said levy of service tax is intended on “restaurants” rendering certain services and is not intended on sale of food, beverage and snacks from candy counters in cinema theatres.

     

    Service Tax exemption on entry to award functions, musical performance etc.

     

    The Union Budget of 2015 had amended the negative list of services and effectively withdrawn the unconditional service tax exemption, which was granted to tickets for award functions, music events, sports events etc. With effect from June 2015, service tax is payable when the consideration for admission to entertainment events such as award function, concert, pageant, sporting event etc. is more than Rs 500 per person.

     

    However, FICCI said payment for admission to any event is already liable to a high state entertainment tax and levying of a service tax of 14 per cent over and above the high rates of entertainment imposes a high burden on the entertainment sector.

     

    The industry body asked for a clarification to specify that the value of ticket for the purpose of levy of service tax on such admission (where the ticket price is more than Rs 500) should be the value excluding Entertainment tax. It also wanted clarification on if service tax is payable, the same should be computed on a value exclusive of Entertainment tax and accordingly no service tax should apply on entertainment tax amount.

     

    Customs Duty exemption on film equipment under the ATA Carnet

     

    The ATA Carnet permits duty free temporary admission of goods into a member country. The list of exempted products covers filming equipment too. However, there is no Customs Notification in order to exempt the import of filming equipment from the levy of Customs Duty, on the lines of the ATA Carnet.

     

    FICCI recommended that Customs Duty should be exempted on film equipment under ATA Carnet. The film production equipment is very expensive and not easily available in all countries because of which the film producers are compelled to temporarily import the same on lease for the purpose of producing the film. In absence of a customs notification to exempt filming equipment, the ATA Carnet duty exemption benefit cannot be extended to import of filming equipment.

    These imports significantly increase the burden of tax on the film producers.

     

    Proposals for Animation, Gaming and VFX Industries

     

    FICCI also made some recommendations for the Animation, Gaming & Visual Effects (VFX) industries.

     

    It asked for a 10-year tax holiday for the Animation, Gaming, and VFX industries; and removal of withholding tax on revenues accruing from sales of mobile games in non-India markets as well as removal of withholding tax on the development contracts given to mobile game developers outside India.

     

    FICCI also asked for removal of withholding tax paid by expats working in India for Indian mobile game development companies.

     

    The Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) applicability for units undertaking animation work in SEZ should be withdrawn to encourage export of animated contents.

     

    The industry body wanted restoration of STPI advantage scheme for AVGC or ITES for another 10 to 20 years and cover/encourage exports as well as IP creation.

     

    To promote domestic gaming market, excise duty on local manufacture should be brought down to nil (similar to film and music industry). This will enable CVD to be brought to zero also. The effective reduction in taxes would be around 15 per cent. Import duty on consoles (gaming hardware) to be brought down to zero per cent to increase the installed base to enable the local developer ecosystem to flourish.

     

    There should be a provision of 50 per cent reimbursable MDA (Market Development Assistance) for travel and registration fees to international market events.

     

    The Government should extend support under Market Development Assistance (MDA) activity for Indian companies to exhibit by setting Indian Pavilions in the world markets. What is needed is to help bringing local production companies to international markets, collect and disseminate information and support creating the infrastructure needed for a healthy media market to develop.

  • News Corp net profit down 52%; revenue down 1%

    News Corp net profit down 52%; revenue down 1%

    MUMBAI: News Corp’s quarterly profit was down 52 per cent due to foreign-exchange fluctuations and lower advertising sales offset revenue gains in book publishing and the digital real-estate business.

     

    The company’s net income for the three months ended 31 March, 2015 fell to $23 million, or four cents a share, from $48 million, or eight cents, in the same period a year earlier.

     

    For the fiscal 2015 third quarter, total revenues slipped one per cent to $2.06 billion as compared to $2.08 billion in the prior year. The majority of the revenue decline reflects negative foreign currency fluctuations and lower advertising revenues at the News and Information Services segment, offset in large part by growth in the Book Publishing and Digital Real Estate Services segments as a result of the acquisition of Harlequin Enterprises Limited and Move, Inc., respectively.

     

    News Corp CEO Robert Thomson said, “The new News Corp continues to build a firm foundation for digital growth. We see that most clearly in the successful integration of realtor.com®, which grew audience and revenue at record levels in the third quarter. News Corp is now a global leader in digital real estate, which we believe will underpin long-term expansion and complement our expertise in news and financial analysis, both of which have been important ingredients in realtor.com’s accelerated growth. While the quarter faced some revenue challenges, particularly at News and Information Services, including currency headwinds, our adjusted EBITDA was relatively stable, underscoring the strength of our assets and the diversification of our revenue base. We believe the company is firmly on track and the signs are positive for year-over-year EBITDA growth in the fourth quarter.”

     

    As compared to $175 million in the prior year, News Corp’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) fell seven per cent to $163 million on legal costs, currency fluctuations and increased stock-based compensation expenses from the acquisition of Move Inc.

     

    These results include $15 million and $20 million in fees and costs – net of indemnification – related to the U.K. Newspaper Matters in the three months ended 31 March, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Declines at the News and Information Services segment, including higher legal costs at News America Marketing, negative foreign currency fluctuations and increased stock-based compensation expense resulting from the acquisition of Move were partially offset by lower expenses at Amplify and increased revenues in the Book Publishing segment due to the inclusion of Harlequin results.

     

    Free cash flow available to News Corporation decreased by $105 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2015 to $391 million, primarily as a result of certain one-time items.

  • Sea TV Network reports higher income, higher pay channel charges lower PAT for Q2-2014

    Sea TV Network reports higher income, higher pay channel charges lower PAT for Q2-2014

    BENGALURU: UP based Agra headquartered media and entertainment industry player Sea TV Network Limited (sea TV) reported a 43.13 per cent increase in its standalone net income from operations for Q2-2014 at Rs 4.88 crore as compared to the Rs 3.41 crore for Q2-2013 and 11.15 per cent higher than the Rs 439.1 crore for Q1-2014.

     

    PAT for Q2-2014 at Rs 0.0773 crore was a little over one fifth the Rs 0.3658 crore for Q2-2013 and a little more than a fourth of the Rs 0.3024 crore for Q1-2014.

    Exceptional items at Rs 0.2134 crore added to the company’s profit.

     

    Pay channel charges form a major portion of Sea TV’s expenditure. The company paid Rs 1.56 crore during Q2-2014 against this head, 63.6 per cent higher than the Rs 0.9533 crore for Q2-2013 and 64.4 per cent higher than the Rs 0.9463 crore for Q1-2014.

     

    Let us look at the other results recorded by Sea TV for Q2-2014

     

    Expenditure for Q2-2014 at Rs 4.32 crore was 55.9 per cent higher than the Rs 2.78 crore for Q2-2013 and 17.7 per cent more than the Rs 3.67 crore for Q1-2013.

     

    Depreciation  for Q2-2014 at Rs 1.1343 crore jumped up almost six-fold (5.78 times) as compared to the Rs 0.20 crore for Q2-2013 and was almost flat (lower by 0.28 per cent) as compared to the Rs 1.1375 crore for Q1-2014.

     

    Other expense for Q2-2014 at Rs 1.0625 crore was 1.9 per cent lower than the Rs 1.0832 crore for Q2-2013 and 1.5 per cent lower than the Rs 1.0469 crore for Q1-2014.

     

    Reserves, excluding revaluation reserves at Rs 48.80 crore were 2.24 per cent higher than the Rs 47.73 crore for Q2-2013 and almost flat (0.16 per cent more) than the Rs 48.72 crore for Q1-2014.

  • Q2-2014: Forex gains boosts PAT to more than double for Prime Focus

    Q2-2014: Forex gains boosts PAT to more than double for Prime Focus

    BENGALURU: Indian visual effect and 3-D conversion player Prime Focus Limited (Prime Focus) reported consolidated PAT of Rs 21.34 crore for Q2-2014, more than double (2.24 times) the Rs 9.54 crore for Q2-2013 and 2.53 times the Rs 8.53 crore for Q1-2014.

     

    The company reported exchange gain at Rs 20.37 crore for Q2-2014 on a consolidated basis, 44.8 per cent more than the Rs 14.06 crore for Q1-2014 and hence contributed to a major extent to the PAT. Prime Focus had reported an exchange loss of Rs 6.91 crore for Q2-2013.

     

    Let us look at the other figures reported by Prime Focus for Q2-2014

     

    Prime Focus reported consolidated net sales from operations for Q2-2014 at Rs 196.06 crore, almost flat (about 0.17 per cent lower) than the Rs 196.39 crore for Q2-2013 and 4.2 per cent higher than the Rs 188.47 crore for Q1-2014. Besides foreign exchange gain/loss mentioned above, other income for Q2-2014 was Rs 4.06 crore as compared to the Rs 6.63 crore for Q2-2013 and the Rs 2.78 crore for Q1-2014.

     

    Total expenditure at Rs 179.42 crore for Q2-2014 was 0.8 per cent less than the Rs 180.81 crore for Q2-2013, and 16.3 per cent more than the Rs 154.21 crore for the immediate trailing quarter Q1-2014.

     

    Personnel cost for Q2-2014 at Rs 92.74 crore was 11.05 per cent lower than the Rs 104.26 crore for the corresponding quarter of last year (Q2-2013) and 1.5 per cent lower than the Rs 94.11 crore for Q1-2014. Of these figures for personnel cost, the company paid Rs 16.89 crore towards technician fee for Q2-2014, a fraction of a per cent lower than the Rs 17.12 crore for Q1-2014.

     

    Depreciation and amortisation cost for Q2-2014 at Rs 28.44 crore was 35.2 per cent higher than the Rs 21.03 crore y-o-y and 26.6 per cent more than the Rs 22.47 crore for Q1-2014.

     

    Other expenditure for Q2-2014 at Rs 55.24 crore was 13.6 per cent more than the Rs 48.61 crore y-o-y and 6.8 per cent more than the Rs 51.68 crore q-o-q.

     

    Prime Focus paid Rs 11.09 crore towards finance costs for Q2-2014, 2.7 per cent more than the Rs 10.8 crore for Q2-2013 but 15.1 per cent lower than the Rs 13.05 crore for the trailing quarter (Q1-2014).

     

    Notes: (1) All figures on a consolidated basis.

    (2) On September 17, 2013, the company received an approval from its shareholders though a postal ballot, for sale of its ‘Backend Business’ which includes (a) business of providing service of conversion of 2D audio visual/moving images to stereo 3D audio visual/moving images provided by the company to Prime Focus World N. V., a company incorporated and operating under the laws of Netherlands (‘PFW’) (“Conversion Business”) and (b) business of providing  the services of computer generated film visual effects by the  company to PFW (“VFX Business”), to Prime Focus World Creative Services Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated in India and an indirectly controlled  subsidiary of the company on a going concern basis by a slump sale  for a total consideration of not less than the Rupees equivalent of USD 3.8 crore (38 million).