Tag: Central Consumer Protection Authority

  • Coaching centre advertising guidelines drawn up by Indian government

    Coaching centre advertising guidelines drawn up by Indian government

    MUMBAI: Coaching centres had better watch out. No more will their promoters be able to make wild claims in an attempt to lure naïve students to take up courses with them. Nor will they be allowed to force students to endorse their courses. 

    The  Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) has issued comprehensive guidelines to address the issue of misleading advertisements in the coaching sector. Guidelines for Prevention of Misleading Advertisement in Coaching Sector, 2024,  aim to safeguard students and the public from deceptive marketing practices commonly employed by coaching centers, disclosed CCPA chief commissioner and secretary department of consumer affairs Nidhi Khare at a press meet on 13 November 2024. 

    The guidelines have been drawn up a by a committee that was chaired by the then chief commissioner CCPA which included representatives from the CCPA, department of personnel & training, ministry of education, Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration (as a special invitee), National Law University (NLU) Delhi, law firm and industry stakeholders.

    These guidelines are drafted in the wake of growing concerns about false/misleading claims, exaggerated success rates, and unfair contracts that coaching institutes often impose on students. Such practices have been found to mislead students, influencing their decisions by concealing important information, giving false guarantee etc.
     

    Some of the Key Highlights of the guidelines are as follows:

    Regulation of advertisements: The guidelines explicitly prohibit coaching institutes from making false claims related to the courses offered, their duration, faculty qualifications, fees, and refund policies;  selection rates, success stories, exam rankings, and job security promises and assured admissions, high exam scores, guaranteed selections or promotions.

    Truthful representation: Misleading representations about the quality or standard of their services are strictly prohibited. Coaching institutes must accurately represent their infrastructure, resources, and facilities.

    Students’ success stories:  In a notable move, the guidelines reportedly will prevent coaching centers from using students’ names, photos, or testimonials in advertisements without their written consent—and importantly, this consent must be obtained only after the student’s success. This provision is intended to reduce the pressure student’s face when enrolling, as they are often pushed into signing such agreements upfront.

    Transparency and disclosure: Coaching centers will need to disclose important information, such as the name, rank, and course details alongside the student’s photo in an ad. Whether the course was paid for by the student that too must be clearly stated. Additionally, any disclaimers will need to be prominently displayed, with the same font size as other important details, ensuring that consumers are not misled by fine print.

    No creation of false urgency: The guidelines will reportedly target the common tactic used by any person engaged in coaching, that is, creating a false sense of urgency or scarcity, such as implying limited seats or exaggerated demand, to pressure students into making immediate decision.

    Convergence with national consumer helpline: Every coaching center will be required to partner with the national consumer helpline, making it easier for students to raise concerns or complaints regarding misleading advertisements and unfair trade practices.

    Fair contracts: The guidelines are also said to address the issue of unfair contracts that students are often enter into with coaching centers. Coaching institutes will no longer be allowed to use successful candidate’s photographs, names, or testimonials without post-selection consent. This provision is intended to eliminate the pressure that many students face when enrolling in coaching centers.

    Enforcement and penalties: Any violation of these guidelines will be treated as a contravention of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The Central Authority has the power to take stringent actions against offenders, including imposing penalties, ensuring accountability, and preventing further occurrences of such deceptive practices.

    Khare, emphasised that CCPA seeks to work closely with industry stakeholders, consumer organisations, and regulatory bodies to ensure effective implementation and compliance with the guidelines in the interest of consumers and public. She further stated that misleading advertisement in coaching sector will be governed as per Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and the guidelines will bring clarity to the stakeholders and protect consumer interests. 

  • Will the centre’s move to reign in the influencer industry boost it or backfire?

    Will the centre’s move to reign in the influencer industry boost it or backfire?

    MUMBAI: The recent years have seen a marked shift from banking on celebrity endorsers to engaging social media influencers by brands for product promotions. The impact of influencers on viewers has moved the brands to consider it as an inevitable element of their marketing mix. The resulting size and growth of the burgeoning Indian influencer marketing industry, expanding at a CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 25 per cent and which is expected to touch a worth of Rs 2,200 crore by 2025 as per industry estimates, has caught the government’s attention.

    The Central government is poised to bring in a set of rules to regulate the booming industry with a list of do’s and don’ts.

    The news that the government proposes to slap fines up to Rs 50 lakh on influencers for non-disclosure of paid promotions has thrown up a mixed-bag of reactions from the mammoth community of social media influencers in the country, even as a majority of industry stakeholders welcomed the regulations as a much-needed measure.

    There has to be a self-disclosure by the influencer with regards to the product/service they are endorsing, Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) chief commissioner Nidhi Khare declared earlier last week so that the consumer understands that there is a commercial relationship between the influencer and the brand or agency.

    Additionally, failure to disclose financial ties with brands could result in an order restraining the influencer from taking on any more of such endorsements for a period of one year up to three years, she asserts.

    Even though ASCI and popular social media platforms such as Instagram and YouTube already prescribe similar guidelines, several industry executives feel that some creators and brands do not follow them stringently. They believe creators and brands will take the government’s guidelines more seriously.

    Considering how the earlier established guidelines were being taken leniently, a strict approach regarding this was necessary for the betterment of the consumers, says 8Bit Creatives founder & CEO Animesh Agarwal.

    Viewers get easily swayed by the content put out by their favourite creators and hence it becomes crucial for them to know the legitimacy of the endorsement, he continues. “These guidelines will ensure that influencers give a fair assessment of the product that they are endorsing without just boasting about its positives. Another benefit of this decision is that it protects consumers from fake reviews related to the product,” he adds.

    This would also compel brands to henceforth select the right fit for their respective products or services to get genuine reviews for their consumers, believe experts. This would further lead to increasing the transparency between the influencers and their audience, voiced by others.

    Alpha Zegus founder & director Rohit Agarwal, a next-gen marketing agency specialising in the domains of gaming & lifestyle, believes that the strict implementation of these guidelines will be beneficial for the creators and the audience. “At present, many brands are requesting creators to make the content look more organic and authentic. This makes it difficult for the audience to figure out whether the opinion of the creator is biased or unbiased. It also hurts the long-term growth of the creator, as the audience finds it difficult to believe their opinion,” he states.

    Influencers themselves, while being cautiously optimistic about the government decision, were sceptical at the same time. The fear is that audiences might start doing the ‘Skip Ad’ procedure with their content, which might drop their engagement for branded pieces, being the uppermost.

    It’s a good step, honestly, asserts gaming influencer Shobith Rai aka Tbone Gaming, who has an Instagram following of 64.1K and YouTube following of over 200K subscribers. “Although it can cause a dip in engagement numbers of the content piece, I still personally want to do what’s best for my audience.”

    “The best part will be that brands will start preferring the right fit for their respective products or services to get genuine reviews for their consumers, they will tap the influencers who genuinely hold the knowledge of their industry and use the services/products very often”.

    Also, if it’s applied to all creators, then it becomes a level field, he adds.

    Your audience should know that whatever you put out has been paid for and just because it is a paid association doesn’t mean the products/services reviews are biased, points out Saloni Pawar aka Meow16k, an influencer with Instagram followers of 21.8K and YouTube of over 60K subscribers. It depends on the credibility that an influencer has and how much engagement and retainers they have with their audience on their generic and paid posts, she adds.

    After a point in a content creator’s career, responsibility takes the driver’s seat, says fin-influencer Ayush Shukla, who has followers to the count of 125K on Instagram. “I have seen many creators not disclosing brand collabs, not declaring to the audience that it’s a paid ad, trying to pull off paid ads portraying it as an “organic” story.” The audience is the judge, he notes, saying that the audience knows when it’s paid and when it’s not. Creators would be dumb to take their audience for granted, he adds.

    Another fin-influencer, Sharan Hedge, while in agreement that transparency and full disclosure should be mandatory “as the audiences ought to be aware of the content they’re consuming”, found the proposed fine of Rs 50 lakh to be “slightly concerning” as the influencer industry is just at a growing stage. It’s an encouraging move but the fine amount should be reconsidered, he adds.

    Marketing and business video content creator, Shivanshu Agrawal too welcomed the move by the government, believing that disclosing a paid partnership upfront will only strengthen the trust of their audience and bring greater accountability to creators.

    Endorsing the Central government’s stance, ASCI CEO & director general Manisha Kapoor said that governments and self-regulators work together and in complementary ways. According to the self-regulatory body, the complementary work of the government and ASCI would only strengthen consumer protection.

    On the other hand, some industry experts believed that this could pose a new challenge for the nascent industry and a community battling marketing budget cuts and India’s ban on TikTok. The clauses seeking honest declarations and due diligence, and conditions laid for expert endorsements can put unnecessary litigation burden on influencers, opined some industry insiders.

    Micro-influencers may become over cautious as they don’t have resources for potential litigation, believes Pulp Strategy founder & managing director Ambika Sharma. The rules now only place unnecessary roadblocks and scepticism in the minds of endorsers, she says, adding that a simple and mandatory disclosure specifying the paid content and their personal experience of its usage could solve the problem.

    The guidelines may scare smaller influencers and in turn deter the growth of the digital advertising industry for a while, but may benefit the sector in the long run, as it will lead to more responsible behaviour in the digital marketing ecosystem, opines others.

    While there is little doubt that the blossoming influencer ecosystem in the country will be significantly impacted due to this development, the industry would be better off for the changes it would usher in the long term.

  • Subhash Kamat: “We are looking for government collabs for ASCI”

    Subhash Kamat: “We are looking for government collabs for ASCI”

    NEW DELHI: Last week, BBH & Publicis Worldwide India CEO Subhash Kamat was unanimously elected as chairman of the board of governors of the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI), an independent industry body that works towards protecting the consumers' interests by containing the menace of misleading ads. The veteran ad man replaced the outgoing chairman Rohit Gupta who served in that the position for a year. Kamath has been an active member of The Ad Club in the past and has been serving on the board of governors of Asci since 2010.

    Kamat has his work cut out for him: ASCI is not the only body which can crack the whip on advertising: there’s the Central  Consumer Protection Authority which apparently has powers to penalise errant advertisers. There’s a huge surge in political advertising, which does not come under its remit. Then there’s the continuing explosion in digital advertising, online and on OTT platforms.

    Indiantelevision.com’s Dolly Mahayan got into a conversation with Kamat on the challenges before Asci, how it is dealing with them, what is he going to immediately focus on, and what kind of a legacy he would like to leave behind. He also spoke about the industry watchdog's guidelines on big and small brands to curb misleading advertisements and what lies in the future around the celebrity influencer guidelines. Excerpts from the interview:

    Read more news on ASCI

    What will be your immediate role and responsibilities? What are your top priorities? 

    We must continue to build on our past milestones, as well as work hard to take our work to the next level. Collaborations across different stakeholders, making ourselves technologically savvier, will be some key objectives so that we are able to address the opportunities of the future stronger and better. In terms of the regulatory context, we have a new consumer protection law and the Central Consumer Protection Authority. Therefore, the context in which ASCI functions has also been transformed. All this makes it imperative for us to think hard about codes, guidelines, regulations, etc. We will build on our past work. The question is what should we do to take this work to the next level? I’d love to see the Consumer Complaints Council and board members working more closely together. The intellectual debate that would follow would raise the quality of decisions and the standards of internal working.

    How do you plan to further strengthen the teeth of ASCI?

    With the digital revolution influencing brand messaging and engagement with consumers, advertising is evolving rapidly. And with the recent formation of the Central Consumer Protection Authority constituted by the government, self-regulation will be even more crucial in promoting consumer confidence and trust. Our industry today is at a crucial stage.In addition to the above, we will look for more close collaborations with government departments.

    How do you plan to regulate the brands and agencies to stop coming up with misleading ads?

    We already have a clear code in place that is continuously evolving. Our processes have kept pace too. For instance, we now monitor 3,000 digital platforms in addition to print and TV through the national advertising monitoring service. We now cover 80 per cent of India’s ad spend. We have a transparent and easy complaints redressal process and we offer fast-tracking of it too. Because we’re self-regulated, we have consistently had a compliance rate of well over 90 per cent.

    What is the way forward on celebrity influencer guidelines?

    The world over, people follow celebrities and get influenced by them. The ASCI code clearly states that celebrities must do due diligence to ensure that the advertisements they appear in do not violate ASCI codes so that they don’t land up misleading consumers. It’s reasonable to expect that celebrities be mindful of what they attach their name to because they have the trust of millions of consumers.

    A lot of small agencies across different pockets of the country are less aware of the role and functionality of ASCI. How do you intend to aware of them? 

    We already have a robust awareness creation mechanism. We do this through regular interaction with the media and also through very active social media channels. That is why consumers know and agencies know about us and approach us in such large numbers.

    Read more stories on Subhash Kamath

    While we see big and small brands coming up with misleading ads across categories, which are the top five  categories with the most misleading ads?

    Last year, the food and beverage, healthcare, and education sectors accounted for 79 per cent of the complaints processed by ASCI. These are sectors we’re looking at closely, especially given the claims about Covid2019 preventions and cures.

    What will be the key milestone that you would want to achieve in this position?

    To be completely in sync with the new digital reality.