Tag: Casbaa

  • India leads in pay TV piracy in Asia-Pac

    India leads in pay TV piracy in Asia-Pac

    HONG KONG: Pay television piracy continues unabated in the Asia-Pacific region, with total loss in revenue estimated to be $1.13 billion in 2006, out of which India’s dubious contribution is a whopping $ 668 million.

    According to study on piracy in Asia-pacific released by Cable and Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia (Casbaa) here today ahead of their three-day annual convention, for the fourth consecutive year pay TV piracy has shown an increase with illegal pay TV subscription across the region growing by 20 per cent in 2006 to 5.2 million.
    The report, undertaken in association with Standard Chartered bank, also highlights that pay TV piracy will result in net estimated tax revenue loss of $ 158 million to the region’s governments in 2006.

    In particular, the piracy situation in India (considered the biggest accessible market, though), Hong Kong and Vietnam continues to worsen, the report said.

    Asked by Indiantelevision.com whether the Indian and foreign players operating in India have undertaken any concrete anti-piracy initiatives in India instead of just blaming the government, Casbaa CEO Simon Twiston Davies said, “The industry is constantly in talks with the government and the regulator on the issue.”

    He added that Casbaa has also exhorted the government to “review” existing regulations and strengthen digital infrastructure.
    The grey market deficit in India due to under-reporting by cable operators has grown from $ 632 million in 2005 to $ 667 million in 2006.

    Thailand also suffers from rising cost of piracy and at $ 160 million revenue loss has the second highest rate of piracy in the Asia-Pacific region

    Other markets facing an uphill pay TV piracy battle include Vietnam and the Philippines.

    The “Greenfield” market of Vietnam has the worst ratio of piracy in the region with one legal pay TV subscriber for every 15 illegal connections.

    In the Philippines, estimated net piracy costs due to illegal distributors, largely in provinces, has risen by 24 per cent in 2006.

    Indonesia is not far behind with revenue leakage of $ 23.8 million as government and industry insiders indicate a substantive piracy growth.

    Singapore is the only market covered by the report that brings some cheer to the industry reeling under piracy.

    As a result of ongoing digitization of cable networks, the number of pirated pay TV subscriptions remains low with a 15.8 per cent decline in piracy costs.

    Macau, covered in the study for the first time, has the unenviable distinction of having the region’s second highest piracy rate with 10 pirated connections for every one legal subscriber.

    The study notes that the Macau government’ anti-piracy measures announced last year have been inadequate to arrest rising piracy.

    The new study estimates that the cost of piracy in Hong Kong for 2006 will be $ 32.4 million, a hike of 29 per cent over last year.

    “This could have a genuine impact on Hong Kong’s reputation as an intellectual property rights hub,” Davies said.

    Pointing out that pay TV piracy is “corrosive” in nature and undermines investments in various markets of the Asia-Pacific region, Davies, however, said growth prospects remain good in the region.

    Interestingly, piracy also results in huge losses to governments too with the study estimating that at least $ 158 million being annually lost to regional governments. The losses corporate profit tax ($ 127 million) and VAT/GST ($ 31 million).

    The governments in the region taking the maximum hits due to loss in tax revenue include those in Thailand ($ 59 million), the Philippines ($ 38 million), Australia ($ 14 million) and Vietnam ($ 12 million). The India figure for this segment was not available.

    No wonder, Standard Chartered head of media and entertainment Lee Beasley said, “Pay TV piracy should raise an alarm not only in the pay TV industry, but also for a range of Asian governments.”

    Meanwhile, the annual Casbaa convention where industry people from the broadcasting and cable industry, investors and regulatory authorities from round the globe are converging kicks off Wednesday.

    Apart from the usual rounds of seminars and debates on issues of relevance, a tech exhibition too is being organized.

  • Casbaa urges pay TV regulation rethink for India

    Casbaa urges pay TV regulation rethink for India

    MUMBAI: The Cable and Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia (Casbaa) has called on the Government of India to make a shift in its regulatory approach to the pay-TV industry.
    Casbaa CEO Simon Twiston Davies says, “The Indian authorities’ current positioning is holding back the industry and introducing significant new constraints of the kind that slowed India’s economic development for decades”.

    According to Casbaa, recent initiatives by the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (MIB) and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) will severely limit development, not just of pay-TV, but of the entire Indian communications industry.

    Speaking at a conference in Delhi organised by the Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India (Assocham), Casbaa said it would like to see more emphasis on promoting growth, rather than on restricting market flexibility, adding that international and domestic examples of thriving, lightly regulated markets are plentiful.

    A Casbaa study last year Regulating for Growth clearly demonstrated this linkage, under-scoring the success of markets such as Singapore, Japan, Malaysia and Hong Kong.

    Davies adds, “India can make immediate and enormous strides towards becoming a digital leader – if it takes fundamental steps to loosen restraints on industry growth. The size of Malaysia’s pay-TV market, for instance, has doubled in the last three years.”

    In other Asian markets bidding for cable systems is generating offers of more than $1.5 billion each, yet there is little encouragement of fresh domestic or foreign investment into the India market.

    Meanwhile, Casbaa believes that the proposed Broadcast Services Bill would create a new pay-TV industry regulator potentially subject to political interference.

    Favies says, “India needs to install a truly independent communications industry regulator. Regulatory decisions should be technical and quasi-judicial, responding to the demands of the fast-changing media environment, and not subject to transient political pressures.”

    Casbaa also highlighted items such as the recent Trai decision to set maximum retail prices for all pay-TV channels at Rs5 ($ 0.11) each and the draft Broadcasting Services Regulation Bill (2006) – which mandates local content requirements for every pay-TV channel.

    “Does the Government of India really believe that all TV channels have the same value; that a high cost movie channel should be priced in the same way as a channel dedicated to low cost chat shows? This makes no sense,” argues Davies.

    According to Casbaa investment in high-quality content could quickly dry up as channel providers find they cannot make a return on their investment. The rate cap decision could quickly produce a race to the bottom in terms of content, to the detriment of viewers.

    The maximum retail price directive ignores market realities states Casbaa. “It is now over two years since TRAI first instituted a cable price freeze which it said would be temporary until the launch of DTH satellite services. Unfortunately, that understanding seems to have evaporated, even though we have two DTH platforms that are now competing ferociously – with each other and with cable providers,” said Davies.

    Casbaa also has serious concerns over a proposed 15 per cent ‘local content’ requirement for all channels aired in India, another example of regulation that will restrict the access of Indian viewers to premium content, especially international news, documentaries, sports and entertainment.

    Many internationally focussed channels do not have India-specific feeds. “How can a global news channel meet a 15 per cent local content requirement? News happens where it happens. The same applies to international sports. And how reasonable is it to expect niche channels from Italy, or Australia, or Germany, or China to carry Indian programming?” ask Davies.

    According to Casbaa, India’s content industries are already strong and don’t need artificial life-support. “India’s film and television industry is now an export market and part of the global industry. Indeed, it benefits from the airing of Indian-generated TV programming in jurisdictions that don’t impose content quotas. The domestic market should operate in sync with the rest of the world and gain the full benefit of a global marketplace.

    “Without taking account of the new digital world, India’s pay-TV regulators will fall further and further behind global trends,” Davies warned.

  • Sports TV forum sees China as an important global growth market for sports TV services

    Sports TV forum sees China as an important global growth market for sports TV services

    MUMBAI: At an event hosted by the State Administration for Radio Film and Television (SARFT) and organised by the Cable and Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia (CASBAA) with media partner CCTV-5, the sports network of Chinese state broadcaster CCTV, China emerged as an important global growth market for sports TV services.

    The August 24th international industry summit was held in Beijing with an audience of more than 400 international and China-based sports broadcasting executives was dominated by discussion of the potential for the Asian sports TV market and the 2008 Beijing Olympics, informs an official release.

    With speakers from World Cup soccer organisers Fifa, the UK’s FA Premier League, ESPN Star Sports, Total Sports Asia and the International Olympic Committee, the conference was keynoted by Dave Gordon, the head of major events at BBC Sport, following an introduction to CCTV’s plans for 2008 by network vice president Sun Yu Sheng.

    “Our biggest advantage is that we have between 300 to 400 million TV sets and one billion viewers in China,” said Sheng. “Meanwhile, I can assure you that China will have five dedicated Olympic TV channels as well as a channel for High Definition TV for 2008, allowing us to screen some 3,800 hours of Olympic programming.”

    Touching on an assurance repeated throughout the conference, Alex Gilady, a member of the International Olympics Committee and the Vice President of NBC Sports, noted that “Sports remains the premium content that viewers have proven they are willing to pay for. In 25 years time, we are not sure whether commercial free-to-air programming will still exist. But we do know that pay-TV (and premium sports TV) will still be around.”

    The value of the television rights that underpin the global sports market was highlighted by Phil Lines, the head of International broadcasting and media operations FA Premier League, “In 2003, our total revenue from overseas broadcast rights went up from just over 170 million pounds to more than 300 million pounds for three years. We sell the rights to 25 countries in Asia providing 31 per cent of our total worldwide audience. Given that we are nearly always shown on pay TV channels in Asia this is a remarkable feat.”

    In the run up to the Olympics in 2008 Beijing Olympic Broadcasting COO Ma Guo Li said, “We are in a very important time right now. But the true outcome of the Beijing Olympics won’t be felt until long afterwards. Then we will see what we have achieved and how it will change China’s sports TV industry forever.”

    At the conclusion of the conference, Marcel Fenez, the chairman of CASBAA, thanked co-organisers CCTV-5 and CITV, as well as the official Host, SARFT. “This event, the second in a series as we run-up to the Beijing Olympics, has demonstrated once again the strength of China’s sports TV industry, as well as its regional importance,” he said.

  • Casbaa gets a strong lineup for convention

    Casbaa gets a strong lineup for convention

    MUMBAI: The Cable and Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia (Casbaa) has unveiled its conference program for the Casbaa Convention 2006 in Hong Kong, tagged From Bandwidth to Brandwidth.

    The event takes place from 24-27 October 2006.

    The event will focus on Focussing on maximising the value of newly-available communications bandwidth via sophisticated brand development and innovative marketing. The speakers are US DTH platform chairman and founder Charlie Ergen, multi-national pay-TV platform operator Liberty Global CEO Michael Fries, Taiwan’s Chunghwa Telecom chairman Ho-Chen Tan, GroupM Global CEO Irwin Gotlieb, UK regulator Ofcom’s chief policy partner Kip Meek, HD Vision Studios president, Randall Dark, Indonesia Minister of State for information and communications Indonesia, Sofyan Djalil and Hunan Satellite president Wei Wen Bin.

    Casbaa chairman Marcel Fenez says, “Annually, this is the most important gathering for our industry in Asia. While the market is rightly dazzled by the promise of the new technologies, our most urgent task is to identify new business models and the most creative content as we develop a better understanding of what is achievable within the diverse Asian marketplace. That’s the theme for Casbaa 2006.”

    The event will feature dedicated sessions on South Asia (India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka) and a look at the key emerging markets of Indonesia and Vietnam, along with special forums on IPTV, mobile video and HDTV. There will also be a special session on Japan.

    Casbaa also announced details of the Casbaa TV Advertising Awards 2006, which this year are supported by a month-long ad campaign targeted at creative directors and scheduled to run on more than 20 regional pay-TV channels.

    Casbaa director of events Kevin Jennings says, “We believe that our campaign, developed with a worldwide agency partner to promote the Awards, will attract a record number of amazing entries to this year’s competition.”

    “The Casbaa TV Awards 2006 have been designed to highlight that marrying creative options with the power of television remains the most inventive of advertising mediums as the industry moves beyond traditional ad placement into on-line integration, program sponsorship, ad-funded content production and off-air events and promotions.”

  • Casbaa & Fifa take legal action against unlicensed airing of World Cup ’06

    Casbaa & Fifa take legal action against unlicensed airing of World Cup ’06

    MUMBAI: The Cable and Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia (Casbaa) has announced that the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (Fifa) and Hong Kong Cable Television Limited have instituted legal proceedings against a number of public venues for allegedly airing unlicensed pay-TV broadcasts of the World Cup 2006 matches.

    Speaking on behalf of the plaintiffs and 110 companies engaged in the regional pay-TV industry, Casbaa confirmed that writs had been served on five high-profile bars along with cease and desist letters served on an unspecified number of public venues across Hong Kong, informs an official release.

    Thus, Fifa, Hong Kong Cable along with Casbaa are seeking monetary damages for the copyright infringements.

    Casbaa CEO Simon Twiston Davies said, “Although the industry reached out to the Hong Kong food and beverage industry in the run up to the World Cup, stating that pay-TV signal theft is not to be tolerated by government or industry, many bars blatantly screened unlicensed pay-TV broadcasts. We have had no choice but to take the matter to the courts.”

    As an indication of the pay-TV industry’s commitment to the Hong Kong sporting community, Davies noted that the plaintiffs and Casbaa would donate any proceeds received from the defendants after costs to local sports charities. Casbaa believes it is important to return the funds to where they belong – the support of sports development.

    “The issue of intellectual property rights protection requires concerted efforts on all fronts between the government, industry, bar and club owners and the general public, especially as we run up to other global events such as the Beijing Olympics in 2008 and recurring high value events such as the English Premier League. The sports leagues who stage major events need a fair return on their investment,” adds Davies.

    The release also states that under Hong Kong law, bars and clubs may only display pay-TV channels under an appropriate subscription from Hong Kong licensed pay-TV operators such as Hong Kong Cable, now Television and TVB Pay Vision. For several years Casbaa has urged that the distribution of satellite-based pay-TV services from overseas should be given the same criminal protection as signals illegally tapped from local pay-TV operators.

    Overseas pay-TV operators such as Dream of the Philippines, MultiChoice of South Africa and UBC True of Thailand are authorised to offer pay-TV subscriptions in their respective jurisdictions but they cannot, and indeed do not, offer subscriptions in Hong Kong. The display of overseas pay-TV channels in Hong Kong by bars and club owners, using special decoders is illegal, adds the release..

  • Casbaa expresses concern over signal piracy during soccer World Cup in Hong Kong

    Casbaa expresses concern over signal piracy during soccer World Cup in Hong Kong

    MUMBAI: As the Fifa World Cup 2006 draws to a close on Sunday 9 July, the Cable and Satellite Broadcast Association of Asia (Casbaa) says that the unlicensed screening of the top-line matches in bars and clubs has been alarmingly widespread in Hong Kong.

    Such blatant breaches of copyright are a worrying issue and a significant hurdle for Hong Kong’s efforts to position itself as a genuine “World City”.

    While the World Cup has boosted Hong Kong bar revenues by up to 50 per cent independent estimates suggest that at least one-third of the cash has been generated by screening pirated TV programming from markets such as the Philippines and South Africa.

    Casbaa chairman Marce Fenez says, “We are very concerned with the ongoing tolerance of widespread piracy in one of the world’s most advanced economies – Hong Kong. Despite efforts by Hong Kong to champion its world class status, when it comes to the basics of sports and entertainment intellectual property rights protection, it still lags behind other media hubs such as Singapore, Sydney, Seoul and Tokyo.”

    According to The World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Ranking 2005-2006, Hong Kong dropped seven places to 28 out of the 117 economies measured in the study. A weakening in the protection of intellectual property rights was partially attributable to the decline in Hong Kong’s ranking.

    Fenez adds, “Collaboration on all fronts between the government, industry, bar and club owners and the general public is central to rectifying the situation and protecting Hong Kong’s reputation.

    “Casbaa has been monitoring the market on behalf of its members and legal actions are planned against establishments screening unlicensed sports programming.”

    Casbaa has also issued a public notice to reinforce the message that screening pay-TV services without legal subscriptions is against the law and that legal actions will be taken against bars and clubs that refuse to cease these activities.

    Under Hong Kong law, bars and clubs may only display pay-TV channels under an appropriate subscription from Hong Kong licensed pay-TV operators such as Hong Kong Cable, now Television and TVB Pay Vision.

    Overseas pay-TV operators such as Dream of the Philippines, MultiChoice of South Africa and UBC True of Thailand are authourised to offer pay-TV subscriptions in their respective jurisdictions and they cannot and do not offer subscriptions in Hong Kong. The display of overseas pay-TV channels in Hong Kong by bars and club owners, using special decoders is illegal.

  • CASBAA adds ten new convergence members

    CASBAA adds ten new convergence members

    The Cable & Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia (CASBAA) is expanding its membership list to include New Economy corporations and telcos as well as traditional pay-TV players.

    In early July, Hong Kong-listed Pacific Century CyberWorks (PCCW) joined CASBAA as a Patron Member, the highest level of membership. Patron Membership grants a company an automatic seat on the CASBAA Board of Directors. On July 1, PCCW (www.pcg-group.com) launched a regional Broadband service, Network of the World, distributed via cable and satellite to TVs as well as PCs.

    Also new to the Association is Hong Kong-listed cellular phone system operator Sunday Communications, which is examining opportunities for a 3G Broadband license in Hong Kong and elsewhere.

    Meanwhile, financial and business information service Bloomberg LP (www.bloomberg.com/asia) has upgraded its membership from Associate status to Patron level and will also take a seat on the CASBAA Board of Directors.

    Other new CASBAA members include:

    Sony Pictures Entertainment’s regional pay-TV channel AXN Action TV which has joined CASBAA as a corporate member (www.axn-asia.com)

    UK-based satellite communications consultancy Communications Systems Ltd. (Comsys) (www.comsys.co.uk)

    Bombay-based media investor UTV’s Vijay TV, which recently launched its Sharkstream broadband service (www.utvnet.com)

    Hong Kong-based Internet content provider WebArts TV.com (www.asianartnews.com)

    Hong Kong-based Asia Pacific Vision, a group that provides satellite up linking services as well as video production services (www.apvweb.com)

    Asia Capacity Exchange, a consortium that provides online bandwidth exchange services (www.ace-asia.com).

    CSM Sofres, a leading market research group specialising broadcast media with a special interest in China among other Asian markets (www.csm.com.cn)

    X [Ventures], led by Bangkok-based entrepreneur Jeff Blatt, provides consulting and representation services for clients in the satellite, broadcasting, Internet, multimedia, high technology and venture capital industries (www.xventures.com)

  • Open Skies theme dominates Casbaa’s satellite forum

    Open Skies theme dominates Casbaa’s satellite forum

    MUMBAI: The 2006 Casbaa Satellite Industry Forum which was held a few days ago featured calls for governments to lower regulatory barriers to the provision of cross-border satellite services or face the prospect of international satellite providers re-directing new capacity away from Asia.

    Patience has reached a ‘critical point’ over regulatory stalemates in key markets such as China and India, is what more than 200 delegates heard at the Casbaa Forum in Singapore.

    The warnings came at a time when advances in digital technologies are providing multiple new opportunities for the delivery of satellite services. “If global operators feel forced to re-target their payloads because of a lack of potential market access, it will be the end-users in the domestic markets who feel the burden through higher charges,” the delegates were told.

    Korea’s SK Telecom has 550,000 subscribers to its TU Media service. Similar projects are now planned for a number of Asian markets. New DTH services are being launched in India and Indonesia while IPTV broadband via satellite and HDTV opportunities have added to unprecedented demand for new satellite capacity.

    And, for this potential to be realised there is a need for more competition, more open market access, Open Skies and a change of mindset by governments, delegates heard.

    Asiasat deputy CEO William Wade says,“There are tremendous opportunities in Asia today and for the coming years” .

    SES Global VP Market Development, South Asia Deepak Mathur noted that even though the regulatory environment is generally stable, the interpretation of the rules tends more and more to favour restricted access. “This is a really serious challenge” he says.

    While telecom markets such as cellular services have unleashed widespread competition, all too often Asia Pacific satellite markets remain constrained by the concept of protecting national incumbents or flagship monopolies.

    Intelsat executive VP and general council Phil Spector says, “This should be a thing of the past,” said. He added that the international satellite community is already operating in the newly competitive world. “The days of ‘build and they will come’ have long gone,” he said.

    One point that was made at the forum was that a harmonised approach to reform can deliver positive outcomes. Such outcomes include greater economies of scale for operators, local user capacity at cheaper prices and help rural users gain access.

    Delivering the keynote address at the Casbaa Forum, China Association of Communication Enterprises vice chairman Hao Wei Min said that satellite is an important instrument for China to provide rural connectivity as part of the government’s five-year plan. “This year some 20,000 villages will be connected via satellite and by 2007, we will have 100 per cent connectivity,” he said.

    Casbaa chairman Marcel Fenez, said, “The satellite industry, and Casbaa members in particular, are benefiting hugely from the explosion of demand for video content over all kinds of networks.”

  • Casbaa, MPA join hands for content protection in the digital age

    Casbaa, MPA join hands for content protection in the digital age

    SINGAPORE: With technology booming in the television world, one matter that needs immediate attention is protection of pay-TV content. Digital transmission is becoming the norm in the Asia-Pacific pay-television industry. Soon it will become the dominant means of handling content within the home and hence content protection becomes a critical issue for the entire industry.

    The Cable and Satellite Broadcasting Association of Asia (Casbaa) technical committee chair and Zieland Group of Companies (New Zealand) chief technology officer Karl K Rossiter threw light on the technical approach to content protection. 

    “Content providers, programme distributors and cable/satellite platform operators need to protect their revenue streams and avoid unauthorised distribution across the internet. This requires technical intervention and the adoption of a united approach to managing the digital output from future generations of set-top boxes (STBs). Manufacturers of those STBs and the chipsets that fill them need to know the technical controls that will be prescribed by platform operators and programme suppliers to protect content. To this end, Casbaa Technical Committee, with assistance from the Motion Picture Association (MPA), has taken up this challenge,” he informed.

    Casbaa Technical Committee has been working in close association with the Asia-Pacific pay-television industry since 2004 and through a formal consultation process with Casbaa members, it has compiled a series of recommendations covering content protection and technical approaches to managing the digital output from new STBs. 

    Rossiter said, “The committee’s approach has been to acknowledge standards for technologies developed by other relevant industry organisations and to incorporate input from manufacturers and operators. The recommendations provide for companies to choose one of a number of technologies, consistent with their commercial interests. On the other hand, the recommendations also incorporate provisions to take account of new technological developments.” 

    Casbaa Technical Committee Recommendations on content protection are as follows:

    For Video-On-Demand (VOD), Pay-Per-View (PPV), Pay TV and other encrypted digital programming:

    1) The ability of a STB to receive and honor usage rules signaling from the broadcaster that may include copy control, redistribution control, content output resolution controls, and content output enabling controls;

    2) The ability of a STB to map usage rules signaling information from the broadcast to the appropriate equivalent signaling in any content outputs;

    3) A standardised set of allowed digital content outputs for display purposes and for digital home networking have been identified.

    4) A standardised set of allowed analog content outputs has been identified

    For retransmission of unencrypted programming, for example, free-to-air broadcasts, over multi-channel broadcast systems such as cable and satellite:

    1) A method for controlling the unauthorised redistribution of such programming comprising one of the following:

    i. Encryption of the retransmitted free-to-air broadcasts, or other unencrypted programming, over the satellite, cable or “other” system and use of the same redistribution control solution established for VOD, PPV, PayTV and other encrypted digital programming; or

    ii. In consultation with the Asia-Pacific Broadcasting Union (ABU), implementation of a Redistribution Control protection regime that (a) provides a method to signal Redistribution Control in the unencrypted broadcast; (b) includes associated receiver requirements to look for the Redistribution Control signal and abide by it in accordance with output rules, compliance rules and robustness rules; (c) may be defined by an appropriate standards developing organization and (d) is established and required by an appropriate authority.

  • Broadcast Bill still has minefields to clear before becoming law

    Broadcast Bill still has minefields to clear before becoming law

    So the government again renews its long-in-the-trying attempt to get broadcast regulation in place. Is it just us or is this feeling of déj? vu that it may be another exercise in futility shared by the industry as well?

    Still, that doesn’t take away the importance of having a comprehensive legislation for the sector that is estimated to be worth Rs 427 billion in 2010 according to the PricewaterhouseCoopers report presented at this year’s Ficci Frames convention.

    The Broadcasting Bill has been dangling on an uncertain thread for close to a decade now. Several information and broadcasting (I&B) ministers in several governments, who have tried to maneuver it past the corridors of the houses of Parliament and into law, have come and gone. All have failed; none have had the drive to push it through. It has proved to be an untouchable piece of legislation; a hot potato that is dropped every time an effort is made.

    The Bill tries to address the issue of encouraging domestic originating content on TV channels by mandating a 15 per cent share for it.
    _____****_____

    Another attempt is being made to enact the covered-with-dust Bill. A draft has been prepared for the Union Cabinet’s persual and initial indications are that it is going to impact almost everyone in the broadcasting food chain. It is slated to be introduced in Parliament during the Monsoon session by not-even-a-year-in-the-seat I&B minister Priya Ranjan Dasmunsi.

    I&B ministry secretary SK Arora has been working for a long time on putting together the document. Help has been sought from several quarters while drafting the Bill: the US FCC, Casbaa in Hong Kong, other consultants, consumer groups and interested parties.

    The Bill tries to address the issue of encouraging domestic originating content on TV channels by mandating a 15 per cent share for it. Then it caps cross media ownership at 20 per cent, and even share of voice for a TV channel or cable TV network nationally at 15 per cent. A Broadcasting Regulatory Authority of India (Brai) is to be set up (have we not heard this one before?), which will monitor the content on TV channels and oversee the broadcast industry in all its aspects the same way as the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India does in the telecom sector.

    No broadcaster or cable TV operator is going to cede power and control they have acquired over the years they have been operating in India.
    _____****_____

    The first piece of legislation is more than welcome and should in the medium to long term give a boost to local TV production and more so animation. Of course, it goes without saying that it is in the interest of local broadcasters to create local content that appeals to audiences and there’s no running away from it if they are seeking to make money out of the market. That they have so largely shied away from doing so, may be part of their business plan. There will be some bickering about this by some of the players.

    Of course, the government will have to specify whether the 15 per cent content cap relates to fresh domestic prime time content or to recycled content. Remember some broadcasters might buy garbage worthy shows dirt cheap and put them on air late at night in order to fulfil the legislative norms.

    Additionally, a transition period will have to be specified so that the domestic production industry gears up to deliver the quality animation and programming that is demanded internationally, so that international broadcasters can – if they want – buy worldwide rights.

    On the whole, over time the 15 per cent imposition could well catapult TV documentary makers and animation studios into the next level. Though some argue that the cap should be higher, it is a good start.

    That is just the soft part of the Bill though. Trying to control share of voice and restricting cross media ownership are two clauses that are arguably going to get the entire Bill stuck in a quagmire; lot of it political. Reason: hectic lobbying is going to commence to do away with them. It is these clauses which in the past have prevented the Bill from becoming a law. And, it is quite likely to do the same once again.

    No broadcaster or cable TV operator is going to cede power and control they have acquired over the years they have been operating in India. Many of their business models are based on this power.

    The setting up of Brai is another moot point. It’s about time a content watchdog was set up. The other option is that the industry kowtows to a xenophobic government’s every content concern and censorship demand.

    Additionally, the draft Bill fails to clearly address broadcasting in a converged era to hand held devices and mobile phones.

    A key question everyone is asking: will the Bill go through this time? It looks unlikely to have an easy ride and, in all probability, will be knocked into another shape and form. Or, it may end up being still born. Its passage will depend on how much pressure the I&B mandarins — and the Congress-led coalition government — are willing to withstand not only from the Opposition, but also allies, some of whose sympathisers have big media dreams in East and South India.