Tag: Arnab Goswami

  • Keep the content debate out of TRP manipulation: Zakka Jacob

    Keep the content debate out of TRP manipulation: Zakka Jacob

    NEW DELHI: One of the most reliable voices on prime time news television for the past decade, Zakka Jacob is a unique breed of journalist in today’s high-decibel newsrooms; the executive editor of CNN-News 18, Jacob is known as the ‘thinking man’s journalist’ for a reason. The man is admittedly trying his best to cater to the unique needs of his channel’s audience that likes to miss a few shouting matches and wants balanced coverage on any topic and present a holistic news cycle covering every topic.

    In a candid conversation with Indiantelevision.com’s Mansi Sharma, the award-winning anchor discussed in detail his journey in the news world, how he sees the new era of journalism, and how he plans to stay true to his own and CNN’s brand. Edited excerpts follow:

    On his tryst with journalism

    Journalism was not something that I had planned to do or was aspiring to do. It just happened. I was born and raised in Chennai and like every other guy growing up there, I had two career options insight; either be a doctor or an engineer. I wasn’t bright enough to study biology so I chose PCM, and did my engineering. Now, again as an engineer, I had two options; head to the US or get into the IT field. And I wasn’t really interested in either at that time. In fact, I couldn’t do coding to save my life. 

    It so happened that I was always an active participant of the cultural groups at my school and college. I used to participate in quizzes, debates and won a few competitions too. So, when there was an opportunity to audition for the post of a radio presenter at All India Radio, I went for the auditions and got selected. From there, I got introduced to a few friends who informed me that Sun News was hiring and I joined them. I moved to Delhi after college and joined Headlines Today in 2003. That’s where it all started.

    On his early days in the industry

    Yes, I did not have any professional training but at that time, I feel, it was easier to get into the field of journalism. All you needed to have was a lot of curiosity about the world and the willingness to learn. 

    I remember when I moved to Delhi, a friend of mine had made me meet S Srinivasan as they were hiring fresh faces at Headlines Today. It was one of the two English language news channels then and I had thought that I would not make it. Because I did not fit the bill; they were looking for young and glamorous boys and girls. Srinivasan had even asked me why an engineer like me wants to be a journalist. But he definitely saw something in me, to this date I don’t know what that was. Maybe I was this enthusiastic young kid for them. When Uday Shankar interviewed me, he had told me that if you really want to do it then you will have to be in the business for many years. And so I have been here. 

    Yes, the initial few months were difficult. I was either doing late-night shifts or hosting the early morning show at 6-7 am and then an accomplished anchor would take on. Also, it was November and being from Chennai, I had never experienced winters. So, doing this job, late-night shifts in winters, everything was challenging. But I was lucky that I got mentors like Srinivasan and G Krishnan, and a lot of friends who were also new to journalism. It was quite exciting as well. 

    On his role models and inspirations

    When I had started, the top three names in the Indian news industry were BarkhaDutt, Rajdeep Sardesai, and Arnab Goswami. I obviously watched them a lot. And then there were people — I won’t say I wanted to imitate them but I did learn a lot watching them and maybe subconsciously had a lot of impact on my personal style of reporting — like Tim Sebastian and Stephen Cole of the BBC. 

    On his favourite coverages

    There are many events that come to my mind but the three that are very close to my heart were the 2004 general election. It was the first general election that I covered and the outcome of it was very surprising. Everyone was expecting Vajpayee to come back but that did not happen. The other one was the tsunami that happened at the end of the same year. Those were the places where I had spent my childhood and everything was gutted, devastated. That left a huge impact on me, personally. 

    Also, the 26/11 attacks; that was not just another terrorist attack. The siege went on for days altogether. I remember we spent 100 hours straight in the office. We were covering everything live. People used to nap for a few minutes within the office and then get back to work. Additionally, it was great learning for all of us as journalists as to what we can show on live television and how to report on such incidents. 

    On the new emotionally-driven reporting style of TV news

    Personally, I get some of the outrages that are happening. In India, right now, people are genuinely concerned and angry; be it the services, or the condition of the cities, or Covid, there are enough reasons for the citizens to be angry. And at some level, they (newsreaders) are trying to convey the same. That’s okay. 

    But what has happened of late is that there has been made a division on ideological lines; some journalists are called left-leaning, some are called right-leaning, some are accused of favouring the ruling party. I don’t like such labelling. At the end of it, it is about bringing stories that matter, that impact people. That’s what this profession is all about. 

    The involvement of politics in news is nothing new. It is the reflection of how society is. What journalists and editors should try to do is be honest and non-partisan. They need to be true to the story. I am okay with a few talk shows, chat shows, or prime time debates to have some sort of views or ideologies. But at the end of the day, show stories that matter, be true to the coverage. 

    On the new programming style of channels

    To a certain extent, yes the channels are spending a lot of time on one single story. But channels spend an inordinate amount of time on one story because the ratings (TRP) is the function of two things; the number of people who are watching a channel, and the amount of time they are spending. So, if we are able to maintain the viewers’ interest, they will watch the channel for longer. It, therefore, happens in the case of developing stories that channels spend a lot of time on the same topic; be it the Sushant Singh Rajput case or the Hathras case. But we must know how to aggregate it. 

    On TRP manipulation

    See, it’s a matter of investigation. And I keep saying one thing, I also said it on my show the day the story broke that we need to separate the content part out of this issue. The content is not the debate here. You always have the choice to change a channel if you are not liking its content. The fundamental issue here is the integrity of the process with which these ratings are measured and that needs to be addressed. 

    On advertisers pulling out ad monies from certain channels

    I support them (the advertisers) completely. Ultimately an advertiser is paying money for their particular products to be shown based on the ratings. And they are impacted the most if the TRP is manipulated.

    On challenges facing the TV news industry

    I think that the biggest challenge, about which even we were worried till six months back, is people tuning out of television. The biggest pressure, therefore, remains the ratings pressure. But I think that people are coming back to television. For any developing story, any breaking story, no other medium can cover it better than television. People are realising that and they are coming back to television. But the challenge will remain to have the viewers stay with us. 

    On CNN's editorial strategy

    I think we have realised over time that our audience doesn’t like shouting matches. Even a slight change in our reportage results in a dip in our viewership. The channel is known for our stories and presentation and our viewer knows that. So, we stick to the stories that we do best. We have to stay true to our viewers. 

    Advice to young journalists

    For me, the most important factor is the curiosity to learn, to grow. So, be curious about the news, know what is happening in the world around you. Also, read at least five newspapers on a daily basis; preferably one foreign, one regional, and three national sources. Most importantly, keep an open mind. Don’t come in journalism because you want to be the next BarkhaDutt or the next Arnab Goswami. Come into journalism because you want to tell the little guy’s story. These days it is important to go to a good J-school, but that’s not a deal-breaker for me. 
     

  • Editors Guild cautions Republic TV to not compromise on safety of journalists

    Editors Guild cautions Republic TV to not compromise on safety of journalists

    NEW DELHI: ARG Outlier Media owned Republic TV and its founder and editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami have been in the eye of a storm lately. Starting with the channel’s coverage of the Sushant Singh Rajput case to the recently unearthed TRP scam, Republic and its top honchos have been caught up in multiple accusations, FIRs, lawsuits and what not.

    Amid such a situation, the Editors Guild of India (EDI), a statutory body comprising of India’s leading current and former editors and journalists, has issued a statement expressing its concern at “the unedifying spectacle of hundreds of FIRs being filed against the journalists of Republic TV, which is under probe for allegedly manipulating the TRPs and spreading discontent against the Mumbai police.”

    EDI also urged the channel to behave responsibly and not compromise “the safety of its journalists”.  Stating that the body does not wish to influence the probe, it however called for an immediate end to the victimisation of journalists in the fraternity.

    The statement further referred to the case of late Sushant Singh Rajput and mentioned that the Right to Speech does not mean that one can spread ‘hate speech’.  Referring to the standoff between the Mumbai Police and TV channels, it said there is a need to maintain a balance between media freedom and the imperative to reside within the rule of law. “Republic TV’s high strung conduct during the unfortunate demise of the film actor also raises issues about media credibility and limits to reporting.”

    Read our coverage of the TRP scandal

    The guild went on to question the channels’ modus operandi of investigative journalism by bringing up the Bombay high court’s rejoinder – “Is this part of investigative journalism? Asking the public about their opinion on who should be arrested?”

    The body even went on to point to a channel (Republic TV in this case) to behave responsibly and not compromise on the safety of its journalists as well as hurt the credibility of the media.

    Mumbai police unearthed the TRP scam on 8 October and since then Republic TV and the law enforcement authorities have been at the loggerheads. They have repeatedly engaged in mud-slinging at each other and have even filed defamation suits against each other. The scam was uncovered earlier in October when the Broadcast Audience Research Council filed a complaint through Hansa Research Group, alleging that certain television channels were rigging TRP numbers.

     

     

    So far, the police has arrested several people in connection with the TRP scam including the owners of several channels – Box Cinema and Marathi channel Fakt Marathi.

  • CBI takes over investigations from Lucknow Police in TRP manipulation

    CBI takes over investigations from Lucknow Police in TRP manipulation

    NEW DELHI: The latest development in the alleged TRP manipulation row is that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has taken over the inquiry into the alleged TRP manipulation case from the Lucknow police, according to officials quoted in a PTI report.

    A case had been registered in the Hazratganj police station of Lucknow after a complaint was filed by a person named Kamal Sharma, three days ago.

    The alleged TRP manipulation scam was first unearthed by the Mumbai police commissioner ParamBirSinghon 8 October. Since then, charges have been flying thick and fast between one of the accused Republic Media and the law keepers. Singh during his press conference had stated three channels including Republic were involved in the rigging. However, the Arnab Goswami led news broadcaster was vehement in its denial of its involvement, saying that the commissioner was indulging in a vendetta campaign. Goswami had also said he would fight the Mumbai police in the courts.

    It even moved the court seeking to quash the FIR lodged by the Mumbai police against it.During the ongoing arguments in court yesterday, advocate Kapil Sibal representing the Maharashtra government and the Mumbai police Police, stated that the FIR has no mention of Republic, hence there is no need to quash it. On the other hand, advocate Harish Salve representing Republic Media, assured that the petitioner will cooperate with the authorities whenever called to do so.

    So far, it seems as if Arnab and Republic are scoring points against the police in this specific case. Will the latter play a hidden card? We can only wait and watch. 

  • Republic TV set to sue Mumbai police commissioner for defamation

    Republic TV set to sue Mumbai police commissioner for defamation

    NEW DELHI: Accusations have flown thick and fast between the Mumbai police and its commissioner Param Bir Singh and the Republic Media Network over the past few months. The rancour between the two parties only intensified after the former accused the latter of rigging its viewership ratings by compromising the BARC sample and paying off viewers to watch the network.

    Now, Republic TV founder and editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami has directed his legal team Phoenix Legal to initiate a suit against Singh seeking Rs 200 crore in damages. Rs 100 crore of this amount is for damaging the newsman’s reputation, while the other Rs 100 crore is for harming the network’s credibility.

    Republic says its legal teams are in the process of filing the defamation suit against the police commissioner. The company decided to take this step following the revelation that the FIR related to TRP manipulation does not include the name of Arnab Goswami and Republic Media.

    In the Bombay High Court hearing today, the two-man bench of justices SS Shinde and MS Karnik noted that Republic TV has not yet been arraigned as an accused in the FIR filed by the Mumbai police.

    Arguing on behalf of the Maharashtra government and the Mumbai police, senior advocate Kapil Sibal said, "There is no mention of Republic TV in the FIR. So how can it be quashed? The FIR relates to an offence allegedly committed in relation to which several improprieties and illegalities by several may be found. That investigation is still in the nascent stage."

    He further mentioned that the press conference held by the Mumbai police commissioner exposing the TRP gaming racket did not refer to Goswami in particular, and that only Republic TV was mentioned.

    Harish Salve, arguing on behalf of Republic Media, assured that in case summons are issued to Arnab Goswami, the petitioner would cooperate with the authorities. He also urged the court to stay the investigation and restrain police from taking any coercive action against the petitioners pending hearing of their petition.

    Salve sought the court to grant Goswami protection from arrest. But Sibal rebutted, stating that no such relief can be granted in the matter since Goswami has not been arraigned as an accused as of now.

    The Republic team also stated that it is filing a contempt petition against the special executive magistrate and assistant police commissioner Sudhir Jambwadekar, on account of the fact that he initiated chapter proceedings with respect to FIRs that have been suspended by the orders of the Bombay high court.

    On 8 October, Singh addressed a press conference where he claimed that the police had busted a TRP manipulation scam that involved various channels including Republic TV.

    Republic has consistently maintained that it has done nothing of that sort and that Singh has it in for the channel on account of its founder and editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami airing “exposés” of the commissioner’s alleged laxity in performing his law-keeping duties.

  • Republic Media provides proof of its innocence in TRP rigging charges

    Republic Media provides proof of its innocence in TRP rigging charges

    NEW DELHI: Republic Media Network has come out with a statement in which it is claiming a thumping victory against the “fake news propaganda being spread by the Mumbai police about it being found guilty of rigging viewership ratings.”

    Republic CEO Vikas Khanchandani has in his possession an official email from the viewership ratings agency Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) in which it has said “there is not a single complaint or malpractice found against Republic TV, Republic Bharat or any other affiliate of the news network.”

    The Arnab Goswami founded news network has been claiming from day one of the TRP rigging press conference organised by the Mumbai police commissioner Param Bir Singh that the law keeper has been perpetrating vendetta against him.

    The Republic Media release states that the email “crumbles the pack of lies floated and repeated over the last nine days by Param Bir Singh and a section of the media.”

    The statement mentions that Republic Media received an email from BARC on 17 October 2020, in which the agency has stated that: “If there was any disciplinary action initiated under the said Code against M/s ARG Outlier Media Private Ltd., then BARC India would have communicated the same to you along with necessary documents for your response.”

    With this documentary evidence by BARC out in the public domain, Republic says that three things have been proven: 

    ·   The Mumbai police commissioner Param Bir Singh’s comments against Republic TV were “blatantly false, lies and an extension of political vendetta. It is now incumbent on him to apologise for his lie-ridden campaign against India’s Number 1 news network.”

    ·   That every word uttered across certain sections of the media is false, unsubstantiated and fake news. “Now that the truth is out in the public domain, the onus is now on those portals to correct themselves, apologise for the fake news and put out the truth.”

    ·   The Republic Media Network which runs on the highest professional and journalistic standards has been “vindicated after a nine day slander campaign curated by vested interests and we have been duly informed that there was never a case against us.”

    The news network has demanded that serious action needs to be taken against the police commissioner as well as the political masters behind him, should they be involved for going on a tirade against it based on a series of lies. It says that it is going to fight against any forces and come out unscathed, no matter how hard the Mumbai police or anyone else tries to intimidate and harass it. “We will comply with the law of the land, but not for a moment give in to the coercive attempts to shut down our pursuit for truth through our journalism. We will fight this campaign both in the courts of law and the court of public opinion, with the people of India by our side,” the statement further says.

  • NBF forms separate regulatory body PNBSO to oversee fair reporting

    NBF forms separate regulatory body PNBSO to oversee fair reporting

    NEW DELHI: With the TV news industry finding itself in hot water over the last few weeks, the News Broadcasters Federation (NBF), an association of over 20 organisations and multiple channels, has set up a self-regulatory body named Professional News Broadcasting Standards Organisation (PNBSO).

    The self-regulatory organization will oversee fair news reporting in its member companies. It aims to bring in self-regulation of high standards and international repute. The key mission of the organisation is to support those who feel wronged by the press, to uphold the highest professional standards in the broadcast, and to determine whether standards have been breached and provide redress if so.

    The former chief justice of India Jagdish Singh Khehar has been appointed the first chairman of the PNBSO.

    The self-regulatory organisation comprises nine members: one chairman appointed from a pool of retired judges from the Supreme Court of India, four editorial members and four eminent citizens. The NBF-PNBSO will meet every three months to review any complaints filed against member companies.

    The panel is currently led by former chief justice Khehar, along with RTI activist Shailesh Gandhi and media veteran Chintamani Rao. The names of the other panellists will be announced soon.

    Members of NBF, who are also a signatory to NBF-PNBSO, abide by the broad framework on editorial guidelines and must refrain from making–

    ·   Criticism of friendly countries

    ·   Attack on religion or communities.

    ·   Anything obscene or defamatory.

    ·   Incitement to violence or anything against maintenance of law and order.

    ·   Anything amounting to contempt of court.

    ·   Aspersion against the integrity of the president, governors, and the judiciary.

    ·   Attack on a political party by name.

    ·   Hostile criticism of any state or the centre.

    ·   Anything showing disrespect to the constitution or advocating change in the constitution by violent means (but advocating changes in a constitutional way should not be debarred).

    The PNBSO is determined to uphold the standards of broadcast news and will ensure that all the member channels follow the news broadcasting code of conduct. It will work closely with all stakeholders to prevent the menace of fake news.

    The organisation has also drafted a complaint mechanism. In case of any violation, the panel will issue a warning including a channel to run an apology scroll specifying the date and time – an action to be complied with and reported back to NBF-PNBSO within seven days of the order. Any repeat or serious violations would attract a financial penalty up to Rs 10 lakh. A repeat violation by the channel/anchor would be penalized with a warning to run an apology scroll for two days with a specific date and time; removing the anchor up to 3 months and/or a financial penalty up to Rs 5 lakh.

    The code is based on the UK based Impress and International Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) and the Society of Professional Journalism of the USA.

    It is worth noting that the current president of the NBF’s governing board, Arnab Goswami, has been named in a lawsuit against "irresponsible reporting by certain media houses" filed by leading Bollywood producers and filmmakers. Goswami’s channel Republic TV is also being probed by the Mumbai police in an alleged TV manipulation racket.

    Yesterday, the Bombay high court questioned the union government why there should not be a statutory body to regulate the content broadcast through news channels.

    The court sought to know why the electronic media should have an "open hand" over its coverage. It was hearing a bunch of public interest litigations (PILs) seeking that the press, particularly TV news channels, be directed to exercise restraint in their reportage of actor Sushant Singh Rajput's death case and the related investigation by police and CBI.

  • Bollywood associations & producers file legal suits against Times Now & Republic TV

    Bollywood associations & producers file legal suits against Times Now & Republic TV

    NEW DELHI: The trouble surrounding the nation’s news broadcasting industry does not seem to be dying down. Last week, a few channels got embroiled in the TRP manipulation scandal, and now the Indian film fraternity appears to have joined forces against them.

    Four Bollywood industry associations and 34 leading film producers have filed a civil suit before the Delhi High Court against Republic TV’s Arnab Goswami and Pradeep Bhandari, and Times Now’s Rahul Shivshankar and Navika Kumar, on their coverage of the drugs probe being carried out by the Narcotics Control Bureau in connection with the Sushant Singh Rajput death case.

    The suit urges the court to restrain these channels – along with their editors and journalists – from making “irresponsible, derogatory and defamatory remarks” against Bollywood and the members of the film fraternity. 

    The producers have taken exception to several derogatory phrases used during the coverage such as ‘dirt,’ ‘filth,’ ‘scum,’ ‘druggies’ and expressions such as ‘it is Bollywood where the dirt needs to be cleaned,’ ‘all the perfumes of Arabia cannot take away the stench and the stink of this filth and scum of the underbelly of Bollywood,’ ‘This is the dirtiest industry in the country,’ and ‘cocaine and LSD drenched Bollywood’.

    The suit states, "The livelihood of persons associated with Bollywood is being severely impacted by the smear campaign being run by the Defendants. This is in addition to the ongoing pandemic which has resulted in extreme revenues and work opportunity loss. The privacy of the members of Bollywood is being invaded, and their reputations are being irreparably damaged by painting the entire Bollywood as criminals, seeped in drug culture, and making being part of Bollywood as synonymous with criminal acts in the public imagination."

    In their plea, the producers have asked Delhi High Court to pass directions ordering Times Now and Republic TV to withdraw, recall and take down all the defamatory content published by them against Bollywood. The suit also seeks that the channels and the four people mentioned abide by the provisions of the Programme Code under the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994.

    While the producers don't call for blanket media gag in the Sushant Singh Rajput investigation, they want the court to stop reportage that violates the law. The suit further asks the channels not to conduct media trials of Bollywood personalities and to stop interfering with the privacy of those associated with Bollywood.

    Reacting to the lawsuit, Times Now news editor Rahul Shivshankar said in a tweet that filing cases against journalists "that have only sought justice for those who are wronged" would set a bad precedent.

     

     

    Navika Kumar also took to Twitter, saying: "All the A-listers can come together but India will continue to fight for the truth. You can’t intimidate us."

     

     

  • IPL 13 grows and grabs television viewership

    IPL 13 grows and grabs television viewership

    BENGALURU: Live telecast of the Indian Premier League (IPL) must seem an abomination for competitors’ networks. Year in and year out, the period during which the cricketing bonanza is played, all genres and competing sports networks have seen viewership numbers dip as Indians tuned into the channels of the network that aired the event live – the network being Star India in this edition of IPL or IPL 2020 or IPL13 as it is known. The Covid2019 pandemic delayed IPL by around five to six months. In a normal year, IPL commences around the end of March or at the beginning of April every year and runs for about six weeks or so. The event this year clashes with flagship programmes such as the twelfth season of Hindi Kaun Banega Crorepati hosted by Bollywood doyen Amitabh Bachchan and with the initial weeks of the Salman Khan hosted fourteenth edition of the Hindi Bigg Boss. This paper comes with a caveat – the conclusions in it are based on BARC weekly data of the top 2, 3, 4, 5 or 10 channels/programmes of various genres in different languages/platfroms in the public domain.

    Week 38 of 2020 (Saturday,19 September 2020 to Friday, 25 September 2020, week or period under review) saw television viewership climb 2.4 percent to 17.0 billion weekly impressions from 16.5 billion weekly impressions reported for the previous week according to Broadcast Audience Research Council of India (BARC) data published in the public domain. Viewership in week 38 of 2020 was 15.1 percent higher than the pre-Covid2019 average of 14.77 billion weekly impressions. Ratings watchdogs BARC and Nielsen have standardized the average data for weeks 02 and 04 2020 as the pre-Covid2019 average. As is obvious from the figure below, television viewership had started declining from week 34 of 2020. IPL 13 week saw viewership growth. 

    BARC weekly list of the Top 10 Channels on All Platforms Across genres saw Star Sports 1 Hindi catupult into it, and that too at rank 1.  Though the combined ratings of the Top 10 Channels in this list grew 5.8 percent to 8,322.475 billion weekly impressions in week 38 of 2020 from 7,863.577 billion weekly impressions in the previous week, seven of the channels in the list saw a decline in viewership. Two channels exited the list in week 38 of 2020. Star Sports 1 Hindi entered the list as mentioned above at rank 1 with 1,247.407 billion weekly impressions. It must be noted that Star India is airing IPL 13 on Star Sports 1, Star Sports 1 HD, Star Sports 2, Star Sports 2 HD, Star Sports 1 Hindi and Star Sports 1 Hindi HD TV channels as well as live streaming on the Disney+ Hotstar digital platform.

    Read more news on IPL

    Analysis of BARC data in the public domain of the top 2, 3, 4, 5 or 10 channels of various genres in different languages/platfroms for week 38 of 2020 reveals that the top channale of all major genres such as GECs’, news, movies and kids saw ratings dip. According to BARC-Nielsen reports these four genres garnered around 90 percent of television viewership. BARC data shows that combined impressions data for the Top 5 Sports channels grew 8.6 times to 1,734.956 billion weekly impressions in week 38 of 2020 from 201.549 billion weekly impressions in the previous week. It is quite obvious that the sports genre has helped television viewership grow, while at the same time has eaten into viewership of other genres/sub-genres across platforms – be they pay or free or combined free and pay.

    Top 10 Channels on All Platforms, Pay Platform and Free Platform Across Genres

    The Star India Network pulled viewership eyeballs with five channels in BARC’s weekly list of Top 10 Channels on All Plaform Across Genres in week 38 of 2020. There were two channels from Sony Pictures Network (SPN) and one channel each from Enterr10 Television, Sun Tv Network and Zee Entertainment Enterrpises Limited (Zeel) besides those of Star India in the top 10 weekly list for the week under review.Two channels, Viacom18’s Hindi GEC Colors Rishtey and Zeel’s flagship Hindi GEC Zee TV exited the list and were replaced by Star Sports 1 Hindi and Star India’s flagship Tamil GEC Star Vijay. There were six Hindi GEC channels, two Tamil channels and one channel each from the sports and the Telugu genres in BARC’s weekly list of Top 10 Channels on All Platforms Across Genres.

    BARC’s weekly list of Top 10 Pay Channels Across Genres also was dominated by Star India channels – there were four of them. Besides, there were 3 channels from Zeel and one channel each from SPN, Sun Tv Network and Viacom18. While the combined weekly impressions of the Top 10 Pay Channels Across Genres increased 10 percent to 7,285.986 billion weekly impressions in week 38 of 2020 from 6,624.357 billion weekly impressions in week 37 of 2020, five of the channels saw week-on-week (w-o-w) decline in weekly impressions. One channel – Star India’s flagship Bangla channel Star Jalsha exited the list in week 38 of 2020 and was replaced by Star Sports 1 Hindi. There were four Hindi GECs’, three Tamil channels, two Telugu channels and one Sports channel in BARC’s weekly list of Top 10 Pay channels Across Genres.

    BARC’s weekly list of Top 10 Free Channels Across Genres in week 38 of 2020 had the same line up of channels in the same order as in the previous week. However, the combined weekly impressions of the 10 channels in week 38 of 2020 declined 1.5 per cent to 3,535.728 billion weekly impressions from 3,588.256 billion weekly impressions in week 37. Six of the channels in the list saw viewership decline, while four saw viewership increase. Six of the channels were Hindi GECs’ while four were Hindi Movies channels. There were three channels from Zeel, two channels from Viacom18, and one channel each from B4U Network, Enterr10 Television, Goldmine Telefilms, Star India and SPN in BARC’s weekly list of Top 10 Free Channels Across Genres in week 38 of 2020.

    Please refer to the chart below:

  • Non-Hindi channels continue to dominate top 10 pay channels across genres

    Non-Hindi channels continue to dominate top 10 pay channels across genres

    BENGALURU: As the progress in the Sushant Singh Rajput case seemingly tapered off, the news genre lost some of its sheen in terms of weekly impressions in Week 37 of 2020 (Saturday 12 Sep 2020 to Friday 18 Sep 2020, week or period under review). Broadcast Audience Research Council of India (BARC) data for top five Hindi, English, Assamese, Bangla, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Oriya, Tamil and Telugu channels reveals that the top news channels lost viewership in Week 37 of 2020 as compared to the previous week (Week 36 of 2020). At the same time, overall television viewership in Week 37 of 2020 at 16.6 billion weekly impressions was just a fraction higher than the 16.5 billion weekly impressions in Week 36. BARC data for the top 10 Hindi GEC channels, top four Assamese channels and top five Bangla, Bhojpuri, Gujarati, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Oriya, Punjabi, Tamil and Telugu channels for the week under review shows that viewership of most of these genre/sub-genres in respective platforms and markets increased to contribute to the small increase in overall viewership. The top five channels of English entertainment channels, infotainment, lifestyle, English & Hindi movies, music, sports and top four youth channels also saw viewership in terms of weekly impressions grow.

    Top 10 Channels on All Platforms, Pay Platform and Free Platform Across Genres

    BARC’s weekly list of top 10 channels on all platforms across genres saw the combined weekly impressions in Week 37 of 2020 increase as compared to the previous week. Nine of the channels in the All Platforms channels list were the same with a slight shuffling of ranks as in the previous week. One Telugu channel from the Zee Entertainment Enterprises (Zeel) stable exited the list in week 37 of 2020 to be replaced by its sister channel and Zeel’s flagship Hindi GEC Zee TV at rank 10. There were eight Hindi GECs and one channel each from the Tamil and the Telugu genres in the list. There were three channels from Star India, two channels from Sony Pictures Network India (SPN) and Zeel and one channel each from Enterr10 Television, Sun Tv Network and Viacom18 in BARC’s Weekly list of Top 10 Channels on All Platforms Across Genres in Week 37 of 2020.

    Read more news on BARC

    BARC’s Weekly list of top 10 pay channels across genres was dominated by two south Indian language channels – three from the Tamil genre, two channels from the Telugu genres and one from the Bangla genre along with four Hindi GECs. There were four channels from Star India, three channels from Zeel, one channel each from SPN, Sun Tv Network and Viacom18. One channel exited the list in Week 37 of 2020 – the Viacom18 associated ETV Telugu which was replaced by Star India’s flagship Banga GEC Star Jalsha at rank 10.

    All the 10 channels in BARC’s weekly list of top 10 free channels in Week 37 of 2020 were the same as in the previous in the same rank order. Six of the channels were Hindi GECs’ while four were Hindi Movies channels. There were three channels from Zeel, two channels from Viacom18, and one channel each from B4U Network, Enterr10 Television, Goldmine Telefilms, Star India and SPN. 

    Please refer to the table below:

  • Arnab Goswami’s advice to budding digital news entrepreneurs and independent journalists

    Arnab Goswami’s advice to budding digital news entrepreneurs and independent journalists

    NEW DELHI: There is no denying the fact that Arnab Goswami today is one of the most successful entrepreneurs in the Indian news media space today, having taken his labour of love Republic TV Network to number 1 spot within a span of a few years of its launch. But it certainly wasn’t an easy journey for him to achieve that. 

    However,  he learnt a great many lessons on his way to excellence. And as he takes on the next step in the trajectory towards diversifying his digital reach, he recently shared his tips for budding entrepreneurs in the new media space during a virtual fireside discussion with Indiantelevision.com founder, CEO & editor-in-chief Anil Wanvari. 

    Read more coverage on Arnab Goswami

    1. Be financially independent

    Goswami pointed out that a journalist can retain his/her independence only if they are not dependent on someone else for the constant flow of money. He insisted that the money could be arranged through debt, equity, or donation. 

    “I will advise that one should avoid going into debt and not rely on donation. There is nothing called a free lunch. Do not accept any strategic investment if you are not sure about being able to give the investors an exit in the near future. You should ask yourself the question if you can’t give them an exit, will they be deciding your editorial content in future,” he noted. 

    2. Break-even

    Your initial focus should be on breaking even in the initial months of the business. The most important thing for any digital business is to break even. 

    “The mistake that many entrepreneurs in the digital space make that they get  excited with the initial rush of money but they should be very careful where they spend it. Ask yourself if you can break even in one month, and if you can’t you should not be taking away from your co-workers and essential resources. Don’t splurge on  vanity,” he explained. 

    3. Don’t launch a content strategy based on seasonality 

    One must not be creating a content strategy based on seasonal issues. The same editorial angle might not work in the long run as the audience's thought process might not sustain. Therefore, a content strategy should be independent. 

    “You should only be answerable to viewers who have faith in you. Do not change your editorial stance based on social media commentaries. The beauty of the media lies in the very fact that the people criticising you for one story might start supporting you for others,” Goswami quipped.