Tag: apology

  • American brewery apologizes for beer bearing Gandhi name but claims it meant no harm

    American brewery apologizes for beer bearing Gandhi name but claims it meant no harm

    NEW DELHI: A brewery from Connecticut which has brought out a beer with an image of Mahatma Gandhi has apologized for the name of its double India pale ale – Gandhi-Bot – but maintains the drink is meant as a tribute to Mahatma Gandhi.

    The New England Brewing Co., located in Woodbridge, describes the beer as “aromatic and fully vegetarian,” adding that Gandhi-Bot is “an ideal aid for self-purification and the seeking of truth and love.” The can in which the beer is sold features an image of the Mahatma who shunned liquor describing it as social evil and led non-violent movements against the British rule in India.

    The brewing company has apologized for the label saying their “intent was not to offend anyone but rather pay homage and celebrate a man who we respect greatly.” The company said they apologize to any Indian who finds the label offensive.

    “Our intent is not to offend anyone but rather pay homage and celebrate a man who we respect greatly. We take great care in creating a product we hope will not be abused in the manner that Mahatma Gandhi spoke of when referencing alcohol,” it said.

    “We also ask our supporters and fans to refrain from arguing on our page with those who may be upset by our label. We want to do our best to be culturally sensitive and respectful,” the company further stated on its Facebook page.

    The apology comes after a lawyer filed a petition in Hyderabad saying that Gandhi’s image on alcohol cans was “condemnable” and punishable under Indian laws. The petition states that the beer can amounts to offenses under the Indian Prevention of Insults to the National Honour Act of 1971, a local newspaper reported.

    “So many Indian people here in America love our tribute to him. Gandhi’s granddaughter and grandson have seen the label and have expressed their admiration of the label. We hope that you understand our true intent and learn to respect our method and the freedom we have to show our reverence for Gandhi,” the apology read.

    According to a BBC report, it was unclear which relatives of Gandhi the company was referring to.

    However another newspaper reported from New Delhi that several of Gandhi’s relatives are critical of the American company’s product. Tushar Gandhi, a great-grandson, reportedly said the family was not consulted in advance about the use of Gandhi’s name or image and that family members are considering legal action over what he described as an insult to Indians. “How can anyone think of using Mahatma Gandhi’s picture on a bottle of alcoholic product? All his life he abhorred alcohol drinking and spoke against it,” he said.

    A grandson, Gopalkrishna Gandhi, said the use of his image was “crass and silly” and expressed concern about the commodification of his grandfather’s image.

    Meanwhile, many Indian-American liquor store owners in the state are torn between the strong demand for the beer and their reaction to its name. Bhaskar Sureja, owner of Essex Wine & Spirits, told the Hartford Courant that though he finds the name insulting, he will continue to sell the beer, which is very popular. “A lot of customers ask for it. I have to do my business according to what my customers need,” Sureja told the Hartford Courant. “My personal feeling is not how I do business,” he added.

    However, Ashok Patel of the Liquor Outlet in Southington told the paper that he would not sell the beer “out of respect.” “It’s about the image of the country,” he said.

    But beyond its apology, the company has not said whether it would withdraw the beer or change its name, but has said on its Facebook page that it has doubled its production of Gandhi-Bot every year since it was released several years ago, and that customers still struggle to find cans of it on shelves or wait in long lines at the brewery to fill large glass of the beer.

    But this isn’t the first time that New England Brewing has felt friction over one of its beer labels. Its Imperial Stout Trooper label featured a Star Wars storm trooper helmet, which resulted in a cease-and-desist letter from Lucas Films. In response, the brewery disguised the storm trooper helmet with Groucho Marx glasses, the Hartford Courant reported.

    Names of other New England Brewing beers include: Fuzzy Baby Ducks, Sea Hag, Elm City Lager, 668 The Neighbor of the Beast and Wet Willie. The brewery also makes a brew called Zapata-Bot, named after Emiliano Zapata, a leader of the Mexican revolution

     

  • NBSA hauls up CNN-IBN, Aaj Tak and Sakshi TV for breach of guidelines

    NBSA hauls up CNN-IBN, Aaj Tak and Sakshi TV for breach of guidelines

    MUMBAI: Broadcasters in India have always been under pressure for not following ethical norms and standards and depicting anything they wish to. However, there are certain organisatons like the News Broadcasters Association (NBA), Indian Broadcasters Foundation (IBF) which have framed regulatory policies for their members.

     

    The News Broadcasting Standards Authority (NBSA) has come out with a series of orders regarding allegations against its member news channels. Channels Aaj Tak, CNN IBN and Sakshi TV unlike ABP News have been found to be in breach of the NBSA code of ethics.

     

    CNN-IBN

     

    Two cases were lodged against CNN-IBN regarding two separate incidences. The first complaint was filed by Mallige Medical Centre administrator R K Lal about a show titled ‘Bangalore woman incapacitated after botched surgery’ which was according to the complainant, a one sided story . The broadcaster was found to not have followed the guidelines and had failed to make adequate efforts to contact the hospital. The NBA has warned CNN-IBN and has asked it to tender an apology by airing it once on 10 January stating “CNN-IBN regrets and apologises for airing the programme titled ‘Bangalore woman incapacitated after botched surgery’ without ascertaining the version of Mallige Medical Centre on 29 to 30 March 2013 and 1 April, 6 April and 7 April 2013.” It has also ordered it to remove the video from its website and submit a proof of telecast of the apology to the NBA within seven days of telecast.

     

    The second case against the English news channel was filed by Hariharan S regarding a child rape victim’s father being identified by one of the channel’s journalists while covering the protest at India Gate on 23 December 2012. Since it was a live coverage, the channel claimed that it didn’t think of covering his face and was only thinking of public interest but it could have been more careful. They also stated that no provisions of the Juvenile Justice Act were violated by revealing the father’s name. The NBSA found it to be in breach and asked it to remove the video from its website.

     

    Aaj Tak

     

    The Hindi broadcaster from the TV Today stable also had two complaints against its programmes. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC) general manager Pradip Kundu was the first complainant that its sting operation ‘Dalal Junction’ was biased as it had not tried to contact IRCTC and had carried the news piece without verifying facts. The channel was found to be in breach and was directed to tender an apology for five consecutive days from 13 January to 17 January at 6:00 pm by running an apology scroll on full screen in large font size with a voice over in slow speed. The video if uploaded on its website shall be pulled down.

     

    The second complainant was Seema Mittal for a show titled ‘Vardat’ on 7 November 2012 with repeat telecasts where she alleged that the channel had carried a news piece with incorrect details. The channel has been directed to carry the unedited version of the complainant prominently for three minutes preceded by an apology scroll similarly done as the one above. In this case Aaj Tak has been ordered to pay a fine of Rs 1 lakh to the NBA within seven days because this was a second such willful violation in family/matrimonial matters.

     

    Sakshi TV

     

    Four students of NALSAR had approached the NBSA regarding the airing of a programme titled ‘drunken girls hulchul midnight’ that involved a fight between students and journalists claiming that the channel had portrayed them in a derogatory manner. The manner in which Sakshi TV’s cameraman thrust the camera in the car to capture footage of the girls along with the complainants and airing the footage without their version was highly objectionable. Sakshi TV has been asked to cough up Rs 1 lakh along with an apology for the days 15, 16 and 17 January 2014 in both English and Telugu.

     

    The only channel that wasn’t found to be in breach of its guidelines was ABP News though a complaint was filed against it by Atul Jain regarding a programme it aired called ‘Bura Na Mano’ claiming that the channel had tried to show then railway minister Pawan Bansal as guilty in a matter under investigation by the CBI.