Tag: Aap Ki Adalat

  • India TV’s grand screenplay: new OTT app offers a family plot twist

    India TV’s grand screenplay: new OTT app offers a family plot twist

    MUMBAI:  India TV, the erstwhile broadcasting juggernaut, has curtailed its dependence on conventional linearity, launching its brand-spanking-new India TV OTT App. This isn’t just another streaming service; it’s a calculated manoeuvre to expand the group’s digital footprint, offering a veritable smorgasbord of news, the cult classic Aap Ki Adalat, fitness regimes, devotional content, infotainment, lifestyle tips, and a plethora of podcasts.

    The timing is no coincidence, capitalising on the booming digital content industry where platforms enjoy a liberating freedom from the shackles of traditional censorship. This strategic pivot leverages India TV’s established reputation for credible news and its uncanny knack for understanding the Indian psyche.
    The move into the OTT arena is underpinned by a laser focus on “premium, exclusive and streaming audience-first content.”

    Forget dusty archives; this app is brimming with bespoke digital delights, including news, podcasts, learning shows, and even original AI-generated stories.

    What really sets the India TV OTT App apart in a rather crowded market is its commitment to delivering “meaningful content in a clutter-free, family-friendly space.”

    This audience-first gambit, coupled with OTT’s inherent flexibility and accessibility, positions India TV to significantly amplify its presence in the ever-evolving digital landscape.

    India TV managing director Ritu Dhawan said: “Our vision for the India TV OTT App is to be the single, trusted digital destination for every Indian family.” She added, “We’ve meticulously crafted it to deliver credible information and enrichment, fostering collective viewing experiences that truly strengthen family bonds. It’s our unwavering commitment to providing a safe, inclusive, and thoughtfully curated space for all.”

    For those keen to tune in, the India TV OTT app is readily available on the Play Store of Smart TV platforms. Designed for communal viewing, it spares households the tedious chore of flicking between multiple apps or wrestling with myriad subscriptions.

    Boasting a user-friendly interface, smart navigation, and seamless live streaming across genres, the app is undeniably future-ready. With this shrewd expansion into OTT, India TV continues to lead the charge in content innovation, reinforcing its pledge to serve a multi-platform, multi-generational audience with content that is not just credible and inclusive, but truly made for India.

  • Nirahua on Aap Ki Adalat: ‘Legalize polygamy for married men with kids, I’m ready’

    Nirahua on Aap Ki Adalat: ‘Legalize polygamy for married men with kids, I’m ready’

    New Delhi: Bhojpuri actor and former BJP MP Dinesh Lal Yadav ‘Nirahua’ revealed many secrets about his personal life in Rajat Sharma’s ‘Aap Ki Adalat’ show, which was  telecasted tonight at 10 pm on India TV.

    Asked about his personal relationship with his co-star Amrapali Dubey with whom he has done 35 movies, Nirahua said: “Our fans created all this ‘chakkar’ (affairs). Earlier when I used to co-star with Pakhi Ji (Pakhi Hegde with whom Nirahua co-starred in his earlier movies), and I used to go on stage, the audience used to ask me to bring Bhauji (my wife)… and after I co-starred with Amrapali Ji in movies and went for election campaigning in Azamgarh, people used to chant slogans ‘Dinesh Lal Yadav Zindabad, Amrapali Bhauji Zindabad’. I used to tell people, ‘arre yaar’, why are you spoiling somebody’s life. I am married, I have two children. She is such a beautiful actor, if she marries, she will choose a person of her choice. Why do you make her ‘Bhauji’ (my wife)? Now, what can we do?….”

    When Rajat Sharma pointed out that it was Amrapali, who when asked about her relationship, had commented, ‘what better thing can happen than an affair with Nirahua..marrying means having a dip in the Holy Ganga’?

    Nirahua replied: “Today we are sitting in Adalat, and our Judge (Malini Awasthi) is here. You make a law that a man with two kids can marry, I am ready for it.”

    When Rajat Sharma pointed out that he had prayed at Ram Lala temple in Ayodhya with Amrapali by his side, Nirahua replied: “Look, when we do some show, or visit some shrine, and the heroine says, I will go with you for darshan, what should I say? That I will do the darshan alone and I won’t take you with me? That’s why we went together”.

    Rajat Sharma: You are not that innocent. When both of you met Swami Rambhadracharya, he asked whether she is your sister, and you replied, she is my Ardhangini (wife).

    Nirahua replied: “Let me explain the reason. We went and touched the feet of Baba. He joked with me asking whether your sister is with you. Then I too joked with Baba and said, she is my Ardhangini. He is a great guru and he knows everything. The baba has claimed that he has seen Bhagwan Ram. When he has seen so much, she has played the role of my wife in 35 movies, she never played the role of sister in a single movie, and the Baba was asking, is she your sister?”

    Karishma Kapoor

    The Bhojpuri star revealed his crush on Bollywood actor Karishma Kapoor when he was an adolescent. When Rajat Sharma asked him why he used to put posters of Karisma Kapoor on the walls of his home, Nirahua replied: “Mujhe Lagta Hai, Woh Jawani Jawani Nahin, Jishi Koi Kahani Nahin’ (Adolescene is worthless if there are no happenings). We have all got a life. Nobody knows whether  one will get another life. We don’t want to go to Heaven and God tellin you that you were offered everything in life. So I don’t  lose any opportunity.”

    Nirahua disclosed: “I am a big fan of Karisma Kapoor. I never missed the first day, first show of her movie. I bunked classes to watch her first show. Once I even sneaked out of an Army NCC camp to watch the first Friday show. I did not want my record to be broken. I was so crazy that I used to pin Karisma’s posters on the walls of our home. When my father used to do pooja, some of the smoke from incense sticks used to go towards those posters. My dad used to scold and thrash me for these posters.”

    Rajat Sharma: Do you still remember those thrashings?

    Nirahua: Now when I go to sleep, my dad appears in my dreams and thrashes me.

    Rajat Sharma: You haven’t stopped doing mischief?

    Nirahua: “A monkey, even when  old, never stops doing somersaults.”

    Mumbai Film Industry

    The Bhojpuri star lashed out at the Mumbai film industry alleging that it was trying to “degrade” Bhojpuri movies by labelling them as “vulgar”.

    He said: “It is a big conspiracy to defame Bhojpuri movies. We make our movies at a cost of nearly Rs 1 crore, while their movies cost Rs 10 crore, 20 crore, 50 crore to Rs 100 crore.  When they try to screen their movies in our cinema halls, the owners say, Nirahua’s movie is being screened, we won’t screen yours.  Industry people start thinking how dare these owners not screen movies of big Bollywood superstars. Then they find methods to ‘degrade’ Bhojpuri movies. In every interview, on every platform, Bhojpuri movies are described as vulgar and obscene. Let the nation decide. If our songs have vulgar lyrics, Hindi movies also have vulgar lyrics. In our movie, if we show a wife asking her husband to fix the hook of her bra, who can do that except the husband? And what do they show, ‘Choli Ke Peechey Kya Hai’?

    Nirahua said: “I want to make one thing clear. Movies made for entertainment, in whichever industry, are made like this. It is for the audience to choose what to see. Pawan Singh (Bhojpuri actor) Ji once said, I sang more than 500 bhajans for gods and goddesses, why don’t people watch them? Why do they watch ‘lollypop’ song? Whereve we go across the world, they play similar songs. So, it is the audience who should decide what they would like to watch.”

    On Bhojpuri Stars

    Nirahua frankly described the manners of other Bhojpuri movie stars like Manoj Tiwari, Ravi Kishen, Pawan Singh and Khesari Lal.

    Asked whom does he consider as no one in Bhojpuri film industry, given the present competition for the top slot between Pawan Singh and Khesari Lal, Nirahua replied jokingly: “I have told both these brothers that the top three slots are reserved for Nirahua, and they should fight for the fourth and fifth slots.”

    Rajat Sharma: Whom do you consider the most mischievous among these?

    Nirahua: “Pawan Singh is the power star. He is the most mischievous. During the 2019 elections, we decided to go for filing nominations – Pawan Singh, Khesari Lal and me. A helicopter was booked. I and Pawan Singh sat. Pawan Singh wanted the helicopter to take off. I said, Khesari is coming. He became crazy. He said, why did you call him?  I said, let him come too. He challenged me saying, show me if all three can go. Before the chopper was to take off, Pawan Singh stood up and asked the pilot to come to the back. He said he would himself fly the chopper. He said, I am the power star, I will fly the chopper. Khesari was scared. He said, I am not going, and  he went away. Then Pawan Singh asked the pilot to take off. So, nobody can match him in the matter of pranks. People used to say, he is Hanuman. He is still like that.”

    Rajat Sharma: I heard Ravi Kishen is the one who gives ‘gyaan’ to all? Tells all of you, how to handle producers?

    Nirahua: Actually, he is the guru among all of us. Whenever we meet, he says, ‘Zindagi Zhand Baa, Phir Bhi Ghamand Baa’.

    On politics, Nirahua described how he first became a fan of RJD founder Lalu Prasad Yadav, and then followed Mulayam Singh and Akhilesh Yadav, and now he considers Narendra Modi as the best among all.

  • Giriraj Singh rules out restoring Article 370 in J&K on Aap Ki Adalat

    Giriraj Singh rules out restoring Article 370 in J&K on Aap Ki Adalat

    Mumbai: With the National Conference returning to power after assembly elections in Jammu and Kashmir, union minister Giriraj Singh has ruled out restoration of Article 370 in the Constitution which was abrogated on 5 August 2019 by Parliament.

    The union minister, known for his hardliner Hindutva stance, told Rajat Sharma in the ‘Aap Ki Adalat’ show, telecasted at 10 pm on India TV on 12 October 2024, “Even if Rahul Gandhi and Farooq Abdullah offer Namaaz prayers every morning at top of their voice, Article 370 is not going to return”.  (Rahul Gandhi Aur Farooq Abdullah Chilla-Chilla Karke Bhore Namaz Padh Len, Tab Bhi 370 Phir Se Nahin Aane Wala Hai)

    Giriraj Singh said, “Prime minister Narendra Modi left no stone unturned for the development of Kashmir, and yet Muslim voters in the Valley did not vote for BJP.”

    Rajat Sharma: You have to win their hearts..?

    Giriraj Singh: “Tell me, how can we win their hearts?  Should I tear open my chest like Hanuman Ji… Even if I do their ‘aarti’, they (Muslim voters) never voted for me. “

    The union minister said, “There was a time not long back when people feared going to Kashmir Valley because of stone-throwing incidents and terrorists. After Modi Ji revoked Article 370, people can now freely move in Lal Chowk. Hotels have reopened, Modi’s policies brought peace and progress in Kashmir. Modi Ji removed stone throwers encouraged by Farooq Abdullah, Mehbooba Mufti and Congress. I was hoping that Muslims would vote for us in the Valley. Now they will have to think. (Ab Unko Sochna Hai).”

    99 PC OF TERRORISTS ARRESTED ARE MUSLIMS

    The union minister said, “I am not saying that all Muslims are terrorists, but the question arises, why 99 per cent of all terrorists arrested are Muslims?”

    When Rajat Sharma pointed out that terrorists have no religion, Giriraj Singh replied: “This is only for saying so. It’s religion which is the reason. What else is the reason? Why are there no more bomb blasts during Narendra Modi’s rule? Ten years ago, there used to be bomb blasts and modules were being busted. 99 per cent of terrorists arrested were Muslims. This begs a question.”

    Rajat Sharma: You can at least loudly say that all Muslims are not terrorists. Only a handful are terrorists…

    Giriraj Singh: I am saying the same thing. All Muslims are not terrorists, but 90 per cent of those arrested (on terror charges) are Muslims. Why shouldn’t I say this?

    Rajat Sharma: At least you can praise those Muslims who are doing good work.

    Giriraj Singh: I do praise. I pay my respects to those who do good work

    The union minister alleged that madarsas and mosques are being used to encourage terrorists. He said, “In 1947, there were hardly 3,000 mosques in India, and now there are more than 3 lakh mosques. They illegally occupy land on the Nepal and Bangladesh border. Yogi Ji (UP CM) carried out a probe and found that more than 500 madarsas were being illegally run….Madarsas and mosques have become home of terrorism (Aatank Ka Ghar). Instead of educating kids to become good human beings, they are being taught to tread the wrong path.”

    Rajat Sharma: You had once described Deoband as the ‘gangotri’ of terrorism?

    Giriraj Singh:  Who is Masood Azhar?  He was a product of Deoband (Darul Uloom). Tell me, should I call him a ‘dharmatma'(pious soul) or a terrorist? There are dozens of terrorists from Deoband. Some are dead, some are alive.

    Partition was on religious lines, India belongs to Hindus

    The Union Textile Minister minced no words in declaring that India, post-Partition, belongs to Hindus. “Main Danke Ki Chot Par Kehta Hoon (I am saying this emphatically). India was partitioned in 1947 on religious lines. If the country was partitioned on religious lines and had Pandit Nehru sent all Muslims (to Pakistan), neither would we have a Waqf Board, Owaisi would have emerged, nor Burhan Wani. Nasrallah (Hezbollah chief) dies in Lebanon, and our Bhais here in Delhi and Mumbai have stomach ache. Why?..If you display your affection for Nasrallah, then we will have difficulty. You eat here and sing songs for those people? Yeh Nahin Chalega, Nahin Chalega.”

    Rajat Sharma: It is because of your remarks that men like Maulana Arshad Madani say, you cannot send back 20 crore Muslims from India and those who say this are zaahil (uncivilised)?

    Giriraj Singh: “Let any Muslim in India tell me, whether any Hindu threw stones at their ‘taazia’ (Muharram processions) from 1947 till now. We never stoned. When their population is 5 per cent, they say ‘kaka’ and ‘chacha’, when it is 10 per cent, they roll up their sleeves, when they reach 15 per cent, they do Love Jihad, and do not allow Ramnavami, Hanuman Jayanti processions or Kanwad yatra through their localities. It is only then that I feel pain and I start thinking it would been better had they left India in 1947. ….Look at what’s happening in Kerala. They are promoting Love Jihad as part of a plan for achieving Gazwa-e-Hind. Had all of them been sent to Pakistan in 1947, these things would not have happened now.”

    Congress cheated voters during LS polls

    Asked how BJP came up with a surprise hat-trick victory in Haryana, Giriraj Singh replied: “You can’t fool people forever (Kaath Ki Haandi Baar Baar Nahin Chadhti) During the parliamentary elections, they showed the Constitution and cheated voters by saying BJP is going to end caste reservation. In Haryana, the voters decided to punish them for this, and the people punished the Congress….Sometimes those who spread lies and confusion, succeed. Narendra Modi worked for caste reservation like no other Prime Minister in the past. He gave 10 pc reservations to economically weaker sections in the general category. He gave constitutional status to the National Commission for Backward Classes. This is Modi’s commitment towards reservation…and they (Congress) are only chanting ‘caste, caste’. They are also looking for castes at Miss World beauty pageants… …I challenge Rahul Ji to declare his caste, his father’s and his grandfather’s caste. Instead of asking others, let him reveal his own caste.”

    Giriraj Singh said: “Congress could only win up to 99 seats in Lok Sabha after its third attempt, but it tried to create an atmosphere as if Rahul Gandhi has defeated Modi. He is a fool (Moorkh), who is celebrating even after failing to win 100 seats after the third attempt…He has this misunderstanding like the ‘titihari’ bird (sandpiper) which sleeps with its feet up thinking it is holding up the sky. “

    Rajat Sharma: But Kharge Ji (Congress President) says, I will not take my last breath until I remove Modi Ji from power?

    Giriraj Singh: “I wish him a long life. Modi will stay for 100 years. Kharge will have to wait like Bhishma Pitamah (of Mahabharat).”

  • Nine state results will decide Modi govt’s stability: Prashant Kishor on Aap Ki Adalat

    Nine state results will decide Modi govt’s stability: Prashant Kishor on Aap Ki Adalat

    Mumbai: Election strategist and Jan Suraaj Party co-ordinator Prashant Kishor has said that assembly elections in nine states in the next one year will decide the course and stability of prime minister Narendra Modi’s NDA government.

    Replying to questions from Rajat Sharma in the Aap Ki Adalat show, telecasted on India TV, Prashant Kishor said, “Results in nine state assembly elections, J&K, Delhi, Haryana, Maharashtra, Jharkhand, Bihar, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Assam, will decide the stability of this government. These results will also decide the direction this government will take. If BJP loses in five or six out of these nine states, definitely the question of stability will become an issue.”

    2024 Lok Sabha results

    Describing the 2024 Lok Sabha results as ‘a good one’, Prashant Kishor said, “People have sent a clear message to Modi asking him to run the government. They have also conveyed to him that ‘You Are Not God’…run the government, but not as a dictator, run the government like a democratic leader. People have given the message to Modi that he should run the government carefully.”

    On prospects of Rahul Gandhi emerging as a forceful alternative to Modi, Prashant Kishor said, “As a leader, Rahul Gandhi has miles to go before he reaches a stage where we can say that he has indeed arrived. But yes, Congress as a party has done better than most people expected, including me, and to that extent, we must give credit to Rahul Gandhi. In this election, Rahul has established himself as the leader of Congress, and none others can claim that stature in the party for the next five to ten years. But to establish himself as a leader of the country, he has a long way to go. Winning 99 seats is one thing, and winning 250 to 260 seats is another.”

    Prashant Kishor gave an analogy about 1977, when the then PM Indira Gandhi lost the Lok Sabha elections and Congress had won 154 Lok Sabha seats, and this time, Congress has won 99 under Rahul’s leadership. “Rahul should get the credit for bringing revival of Congress”, he said.

    The poll strategist said, “The opposition now seems to be appearing more cohesive as a unit. This is a good thing for democracy. At least Parliament is having good debates. ..We should applaud their efforts in setting their own narrative in a coordinated manner.”

    Jan Suraaj Party

    Prashant Kishor, planning to launch his Jan Suraaj Party in Bihar on 2 October, said, “The biggest beneficiaries of this year’s Lok Sabha election are parties like us who are offering an alternative to the voters. If the BJP had won 350 to 400 seats, they would not have allowed us to work in Bihar…The opposition will never become weak in a country like India, where more than 60 crore people earn less than Rs 100 per day. No amount of ads, or PR through Facebook, YouTube can impress them. They are not your bonded laborers.”

    The poll strategist said that BJP would continue to be the political axis on the national scene for the next 25 to 30 years, irrespective of whether it wins or loses elections. “The Congress was the political axis from 1950 till 1990, and there has been a clear shift of this axis from Congress to BJP”, he said.

    Prashant Kishor admitted that his assessment of BJP winning 300 Lok Sabha seats this time proved wrong. “Those who make political assessment are not gods”, he said.

    Citing reasons, Prashant Kishor said, “One of my six assessments for the elections proved wrong. BJP’s vote share remained at 36 per cent, though there was a 0.7 per cent drop. My assessment was, it should have won 300 seats, but it won 240. The intensity of support that Modi got in 2014 and 2019 was lesser this time. On the ground level, rural distress, farmers’ problems and growing inequality was one of the reasons. Uttar Pradesh politics has become a big challenge for BJP and RSS, irrespective of numbers. I admit I made a mistake in assessment. When there is a strong government, there is a fear factor that develops. A wrong perception developed.”

    Asked whether BJP made a mistake by coining the slogan ‘Ab Ki Baar, 400 Paar’, Prashant Kishor replied, “The slogan was good, but it was completed not by BJP, but by the opposition. The opposition succeeded in projecting that the BJP wanted 400 seats in order to amend the Constitution and end caste reservation. All credit goes to the opposition. Some loudmouthed BJP leaders also said the party would change the Constitution after winning 400 seats.”

    On whether the use of words like mujra, mangalsutra by Modi during electioneering could be one of the reasons, Prashant Kishor said, “BJP core supporters never expected such words from the prime minister considering the imagery that was created over the last 10 years about Modi. Instead of galvanizing the cadres, it disappointed them. In some places, it caused panic.”

    Yogi and Modi

    Asked whether the electoral losses in UP were due to reported differences between Yogi Adityanath and Amit Shah,  Prashant Kishor replied, “I do not see it as personal rivalry. But if you see from a wider perspective, I can cite the example of 2009 LS elections. At that time, Modi was chief minister of Gujarat and L K Advani was the party’s national leader. In 2009, BJP did not do well in Gujarat, but I am not saying Modi’s supporters sabotaged Advani’s campaign.  The message that went through was that if Advani won, then our leader Modi will take more time to become PM.  Maybe this was what happened in Uttar Pradesh this time.”

    Prashant Kishor said, “Some people felt that if Modi and Amit Shah won a huge majority, Yogi may lose his chair. What Kejriwal said about Yogi at that time clicked. Even in Bihar, during my padyatra, people asked me whether Yogi would be removed if BJP won 400 seats. It is not that Yogi may have told his supporters to defeat BJP candidates. This is not my topic and I normally do not speak on such matters. But the message surely went out among Yogi’s supporters.”

    Asked whether the arrest of two chief ministers Arvind Kejriwal and Hemant Soren impacted the elections, Prashant Kishor replied negatively. “I don’t think so. Had it been so, BJP would have been swept off in Jharkhand. Instead, BJP faced losses in Rajasthan and Maharashtra. If Hemant Soren’s arrest could have caused tremors, then the biggest losses to BJP would have been in Bihar and Jharkhand.”

    On the Bihar results, Prashant Kishor said, “Lalu phenomenon is the biggest factor in Bihar for the last 25-30 years.  A large section of voters in Bihar, who have seen the jungle raj for 15 years during RJD rule, will never vote for Lalu. Nitish Kumar won 12 LS seats only because of this Lalu factor.”

  • India TV’s Rajat Sharma wins personality rights and trademark case in Delhi High Court

    India TV’s Rajat Sharma wins personality rights and trademark case in Delhi High Court

    Mumbai: India TV and Rajat Sharma have achieved a significant legal victory, protecting their trademark and personality rights from misuse of the India TV logo and the “Aap Ki Adalat” show and mark. The Delhi High Court has ruled, in an interim order, in favour of the senior journalist, Shri Rajat Sharma, recognizing his personality rights and India TV’s trademarks/logos.

    India TV and Shri Rajat Sharma initiated legal action by filing a suit for a permanent injunction before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, seeking relief against an infringer who was unlawfully using trademarks/logos resembling “India TV” and “Aap Ki Adalat.” The infringing party, identified as “Jhandiya TV ” was utilizing an identical logo and the name ” Baap ki Adalat ” Additionally, the plaintiffs sought an injunction to prevent the unauthorized use of any photograph, video, or name of Shri Rajat Sharma, in violation of his personality rights, across various mediums including trademarks/logos, trading styles, domain names, social media posts, audio-video content, and related services.

    Recognizing the merits of the case, the court issued an interim order granting protection in the following terms:-

    1- Trademark and Logo Use Restrained: The infringing party and its representatives are barred from using the disputed trademark/logo, such as “Baap ki Adalat,” or any deceptively similar marks/logos to “India TV” and “Aap Ki Adalat” across various mediums including trademarks, trade names, logos, trading styles, domain names, social media posts, audio-video content, and related services.

    2- Protection of Personality Rights: The infringing party and its representatives are prohibited from using the photograph, video, or name of Shri Rajat Sharma in any form (e.g., trademarks, logos, trading styles, domain names, social media posts, audio-video content, or related services) to prevent the violation of Shri Rajat Sharma’s personality rights.

    3- Content Removal: Internet platforms [‘X’ (formerly Twitter), YouTube (Google India Private Limited), and Facebook (Meta)] have been directed to remove the disputed content, including social media posts/links containing the infringing trademarks/logos and any other deceptively similar marks/logos identified in the court application. Additional links identified by India TV must also be removed.

    India TV and Shri Rajat Sharma stand resolute in safeguarding their intellectual property and personality rights. In the dynamic digital realm, where information spreads swiftly, preserving these rights is imperative. Emerging technologies underscore the crucial need for robust intellectual property protection, ensuring the preservation of reputation, integrity, and commercial interests. The commitment to pursue all legal avenues underscores the determination to maintain the integrity of its brand and identity in an ever-evolving digital landscape.

  • Aap Ki Adalat on India TV boosts impact with record digital engagement

    Aap Ki Adalat on India TV boosts impact with record digital engagement

    Mumbai: The television show, “Aap Ki Adalat,” hosted by the journalist Rajat Sharma, continues to set new benchmarks in the realm of news broadcasting. Since its inception, the show has distinguished itself through incisive interviews and candid discussions, becoming an integral part of Indian television. “Aap Ki Adalat” offers viewers unparalleled insights into the minds of political leaders, celebrities, and other prominent figures, making it a cornerstone of Indian news media.

    A testament to the show’s profound impact is the recent interview with Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath. This episode surpassed a staggering 100 million views across various digital platforms, underscoring the immense public interest and trust in the program’s content. The interview provided viewers with unprecedented insights into the Chief Minister’s perspectives on governance, his policies, and his personal views. This level of engagement and the quality of content reaffirms the show’s reputation for delivering unfiltered and compelling journalism.

    Competition news channels have previously featured interviews with CM Yogi Adityanath in 2024, but “Aap Ki Adalat” is the only show to surpass 100 million views on digital platforms in just 13 13-day short span of time. This unprecedented impact has made “Aap Ki Adalat” one of the most influential shows in the digital era, solidifying its importance in contemporary news broadcasting. Celebrated for its unique ability to generate headlines, the show excels in unveiling untold statements and secret revelations. The distinctive format of “Aap Ki Adalat,” which fosters an environment of transparency and honesty, resonates deeply with its audience. This approach has established the show as a reliable and respected platform for truth-seeking and in-depth journalism.

    Rajat Sharma’s interviewing style is a key factor in the show’s success. His skilful and meticulous approach ensures that each interview is both engaging and enlightening. Sharma’s ability to ask probing questions while maintaining a respectful demeanour allows him to elicit candid responses from his guests. This technique not only brings forth the truth but also encourages transparency, making “Aap Ki Adalat” a pivotal platform for significant conversations.

    Each episode of “Aap Ki Adalat” reinforces its status as a critical space for impactful news broadcasting. The show continues to be at the forefront of bringing important issues to light and facilitating meaningful discussions. Its commitment to truth and transparency ensures that it remains a vital part of Indian media, consistently delivering content that resonates with and informs its viewers.

  • Aap Ki Adalat: Setting the bar for influence in news broadcasting

    Aap Ki Adalat: Setting the bar for influence in news broadcasting

    Mumbai: India’s iconic television news show, Aap ki Adalat stands as a beacon of influence in the realm of news broadcasting. Renowned for its incisive interviews and candid discussions, the show, hosted by the most followed journalist on Twitter (formally X) Rajat Sharma, offers viewers a unique perspective, delving into various issues from politics to entertainment. With its unparalleled format and impactful interviews, Aap ki Adalat has etched its place as a keystone of Indian television, providing audiences with unparalleled insights into the minds of their popular leaders and favourite celebrities. This show recently witnessed the presence of prominent political faces including Rajnath Singh, Asaduddin Owaisi, Mdhavi Latha, and Revanath Reddy.

    This show has risen to become an influential news program, with prominent figures and parties actively endorsing it to the public. This unprecedented acclaim marks a historic milestone in Indian television, highlighting the show’s exceptional ability to engage audiences and shape public discourse. Through its unmatched combination of interrogation and truthfulness, Aap ki Adalat has transcended traditional news formats to become a cultural phenomenon, sparking conversations and setting new benchmarks in journalism.

    The convergence of various ideological factions around Aap ki Adalat is a piece of evidence of its unparalleled transparency and impact. Serving as a powerful medium, the show connects with millions of viewers across diverse spectrums. Tune in every Saturday at 10 pm and Sunday at 10 am and 10 pm to witness the profound impact of Aap ki Adalat firsthand.

  • Pushkar Singh Dhami in Aap Ki Adalat: “Police will not harass live-in couples under UCC law”

    Pushkar Singh Dhami in Aap Ki Adalat: “Police will not harass live-in couples under UCC law”

    Mumbai: Uttarakhand chief minister Pushkar Singh Dhami has promised that live-in couples living in the state will not be “unduly harassed” by police and administration for not complying with the new Uniform Civil Code bill that is going to be enacted.

    Replying to questions in Rajat Sharma’s ‘Aap Ki Adalat’ show, telecasted on India TV, Dhami said: “I want to tell people that our government has formed a committee, soon after the passage of UCC Bill, to frame rules so that nobody in the police and administration can misuse its provisions. The rules will ensure that people (live-in couples) are not unduly harassed, do not face excesses or undue pressures and are not subjected to misbehaviour. It is our duty to ensure that the implementation of UCC law should become a model for other states too.”

    The nine-member committee headed by a former chief secretary was set up last week to prepare a draft of rules relating to procedures, designation of competent level authorities for easy implementation of the provisions of the UCC law. Uttarakhand is the first state in India to enact the uniform civil code law which also covers live-in relationships. It requires compulsory registration of live-in couples, a record of which will be kept in police station. It also prescribes jail term of up to six months for not producing a certificate of live-in relationship.

    Reacting to Congress leader Shashi Tharoor’s remark that the government in Uttarakhand was invading the privacy of couples “in bedroom” and is acting like a “nanny state”, the chief minister said: “The provisions in the law have been made not for the benefit of Shashi Tharoor, but for the protection of our sons and daughters, so that their parents can know how their children are living. You have seen reports of people killing their live-in partners, cutting their bodies to pieces and stuffing them in suitcases. Children born of live-in couples have none to take care of and they are deprived of their share in property. …We have incorporated the registration (of live-in couples) provisions for their security.”

    Dhami said: “Our aim is not to harass anybody, but at least children must get security. Today they (live-in couples) are in love, and after 5 to 10 years, when love turns sour(mohabbat gadbadaa jaati hai), they start accusing each other.”

    When Rajat Sharma asked why provision has been made for live-in couples to inform police when they separate, Pushkar Singh Dhami replied: “No they  need go for a fresh registration. They should only inform that they are no more staying together. This law has not been made to target anybody.”

    Dhami said: “The government, as a guardian, has made this law so that the future of our children is safe. ..If they (live-in couples) give birth to children, we have to think about the future of the kids too. Let them (couples) live together, but their parents should know how and where they are staying. If some unfortunate incidents take place, think of the trauma that the parents go through.”

    On ‘Love Jihad’, the Uttarakhand chief minister emphatically said: “Incidents like Love Jihad are very bad. Such incidents are not at all acceptable in Uttarakhand. There is no place for Love Jihad in Devbhoomi. Our Devbhoomi must remain sacred.”

    Asked about the objections raised by Muslim clergy that the UCC law goes against Shariah and Islamic injunctions, Dhami said: “People belonging to different religions are free to follow their customary traditions of marriage. No changes have been made as far as weddings are concerned. Muslims can follow their customary Nikaah, Christians can follow Holy Marriage, Hindus can follow Saat Phere tradition and Sikhs can follow Anand Karaj rites.”

    Dhami pointed out that BJP had promised to bring Uniform Civil Code law in its manifesto during 2022 Uttarakhand assembly polls. “UCC was our ‘sankalp’ (promise). Modi’s ‘Ek Bharat, Shreshta Bharat’ is our ‘sankalp’. Uttarakhand is Devbhoomi (Land of Gods), the Ganga and Yamuna flow from Uttarakhand, it is the land of our rishi-munis. Article 44 clearly provides for bringing Uniform Civil Code for all. The people of the state have blessed us for fulfilling this promise.”

    Dhami said, In UCC law “we have abolished talaq and polygamy..We do not want women’s rights to be curtailed…I would like to make one point: Ab Desh Me Shariyat Nahin Chalegi (We won’t allow Shariat in the country). Samaan Nagrik Sanhita (UCC) Chalegi…   Those who believe in Constitution will benefit and they will be freed from social evils like Halala.”

    The Chief Minister said, he met Muslim women in Haridwar who praised the UCC law and told him that they have been freed from a big curse (abhishaap). “We have got back our self-respect”, the Muslim women told me.”  

    Asked by Rajat Sharma whether Uttarakhand is being made the laboratory for Hindutva, Dhami replied: “Prayogshala jaisi koi baat nahin (nothing like laboratory), the people of Uttarakhand have given us the mandate. Where will you have Hindutva, if not in Uttarakhand? (Hindutva Agar Uttarakhand mein nahin Hoga, Toh Aur Kahaan Hoga?”

    On the recent communal violence in Haldwani, the chief minister said, “Government land like PWD land, irrigation department land, revenue land and forest land were encroached upon and ‘mazaars’ were built. These were illegal encroachments. We dug out several mazaars and did not find any skeletal remains. How can anybody justify encroachments?… This is ‘Land Jihad’.

    Dhami said: “We will not allow any change to the ‘mool swaroop’ (original features) of our Devbhoomi… If mosque has been built on encroached land, it will be considered as encroachment, and will be removed.”  

    Dhami also said,  “We will not allow change in the demography of Devbhoomi at any cost”, he said.

    ‘Mazaars’ were built on govt land, encroachments will be removed, says Dhami on Haldwani

    Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami has said that ‘mazaars’ were built on government lands in the state and termed the act of “illegal encroachments” as “Land Jihad”. Dhami, in a stern message, said that the government would remove any mosque built on the encroached land, considering it as “encroachment”.

    The Chief Minister stressed that his administration would not allow a change in demography at any cost.

    Replying to questions on the recent Haldwani violence in Rajat Sharma’s ‘Aap Ki Adalat’ show, Dhami said, “The government land like PWD land, irrigation department land, revenue land and forest land were encroached upon and ‘mazaars’ were built. These were illegal encroachments. We dug out several mazaars and did not find any skeletal remains. How can anybody justify encroachments?… This is ‘Land Jihad’”.

    “We will not allow any change to the ‘mool swaroop’ (original features) of our Devbhoomi… If mosque has been built on encroached land, it will be considered as encroachment and will be removed. We will not allow change in demography of Devbhoomi at any cost,” he added.

  • ‘RGV rejected me for a gangster’s role – Actor Pankaj Tripathi tells Rajat Sharma in ‘Aap Ki Adalat’

    ‘RGV rejected me for a gangster’s role – Actor Pankaj Tripathi tells Rajat Sharma in ‘Aap Ki Adalat’

    Mumbai: Bollywood and OTT star actor Pankaj Tripathi has revealed how director Ram Gopal Varma once rejected him for a gangster’s role after carrying out a test. “It was good otherwise both he and I would have suffered losses”, Tripathi said.

    Appearing in Rajat Sharma’s iconic show ‘Aap Ki Adalat’, telecasted on Saturday 6 January 2024, Pankaj Tripathi was asked why a noted director like Ram Gopal Varma rejected him for a gangster’s role.

    Pankaj Tripathi replied: “Yes, I once went to him and found several ferocious looking ‘gunday’ (gangsters) already waiting there. Some had deep scars on their faces. I asked one of them, are you really an actor? He replied, Ram Gopal Varma casts dangerous looking characters. Those days, aspiring actors used to deliberately cut their faces with blades, so that Ram Gopal Varma may spot and cast them.

    Rajat Sharma: Did Ramu call you?

    Pankaj Tripathi: Yes, he called me. It was an interesting incident. Ramu asked me to sit on a bench meant for four persons. I sat on the bench in a corner. He told me, ‘No No, come more close this side’. On a bench meant for four, I was sitting alone and he stared at me intently for 10 to 15 minutes. I felt very sheepish, when he continued to stare me for long. Then he told me, ‘Jao, Go’. He didn’t call me later….Of course, he is a good director. He met me once later and praised my acting, and said, “You are doing good, Pankaj”.

    Rajat Sharma: He must have realized, if he had cast you then it could have been his gain?

    Tripathi: It’s all a game of time (Samay Ka Khel Hota Hai). If he had cast me then, then it would have been his loss and my loss too. (Tripathi told the audience) So, if nothing big happens in your life, don’t be disappointed, it is an omen for something good that is going to happen.

    ‘I Never Check Monitor After Shoot’

    Pankaj Tripathi revealed he never watched the camera monitor after completing his shoot.  He said, “This is a rare thing which few people in the media know about. You (Rajat Sharma) have good spies in Mumbai. I never check the camera monitor after finishing my shoot. I think the director is the captain and it is his job to check the monitor. If he okays the scene, then it means he got what he wanted.”

    ‘Fukrey’ and Other Sequels

    Asked whether he changed his dialogues and sometimes, even the climax in his films, Pankaj Tripathi admitted in the affirmative. He said, at this moment, five of his films have sequels because they were hits.

    Rajat Sharma: Where did you get this idea of mixing Hindi with English in your dialogues?

    Tripathi: In the first part of the movie Fukrey, it was my idea. I told the director (M S Lamba) I wanted to change my lines. He first refused. While I was rehearsing, lighting work was going on inside the security cabin of Delhi’s Miranda College. The director told me don’t mix English in your dialogue, I told him I am only rehearsing. The lighting men began to laugh when I mixed English in my dialogues. By that time, the director had seen my rehearsed dialogue, and he agreed. In ‘Fukrey Returns’, I got the written dialogues. Also in ‘Fukrey 3’ too.

    Rajat Sharma: In Fukrey Part 1 and Part 2, your picture was not there in the posters, but in Part 3, your picture was there in the poster. Pankaj Tripathi has become a saleable star now?

    Tripathi: Yahi Toh Jeevan Hai (This is Life)

    Rajat Sharma: That’s why you are doing several sequels of your films?

    Tripathi: Sequels are made when film becomes a hit. Unsuccessful films don’t have sequels. At this moment, five of my films have sequels – Stree, Mirzapur, Criminal Justice, Fukrey and also Gangs of Wasseypur.

    Rajat Sharma: There was this ‘Super 30’ movie in which you were doing the role of a neta. You deliberately changed the dialogues?

    Tripathi: Vikas Bahl was the director. There was the scene where a student’s gets admission to Oxford University and asks the neta for money. The neta started blubbering something else. The neta was saying: ‘Ja Rahe Ho? Kahan Ja Rahe Ho? Jao, Jao, London Jao, Paris Jao, Japan Jao, Vietnam Jao, China Jao, Beijing Jao, Dubai Jao, Bahrain Jao.’ It looked like a poetry. The lines were not written. The dialogue was delivered spontaneously. I was doing the role of a neta in Bihar (Minister Shriram Singh in the movie). I had seen a leader in my village who used to blubber meaninglessly. I told the director Vikas Bahl, I will speak in the same manner. So, the scene developed in that way. It looked different.

    Rajat Sharma: Can you repeat the same dialogue here?

    Tripathi: It was, “Dubai Jao, Bahrain Jao … Kya Baat Hai. The boy said, Sir, you had called me. I replied: Hum har us cheez ko bulate hain, jo desh ke liye baat karega. The boy said, I need money. I replied: Jao Jao Jahan Jaana, par paisa aur prem ke chakkar me mat padna. Humne achche achhe ko barbaad hote dekha hai. Bhagat Singh padhe they? Dekho, nahin pade they. Jao Jao.” So you see, the neta starts giving a sermon instead of giving money.

  • Sometimes people reveal their true position by mistake’: S. Jaishankar on Rahul Gandhi’s praise for China’s BRI

    Sometimes people reveal their true position by mistake’: S. Jaishankar on Rahul Gandhi’s praise for China’s BRI

    Mumbai: Union external affairs minister S. Jaishankar in the upcoming episode of ‘Aap Ki Adalat’ took a swipe at Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for praising China for the Belt and Road (BRI) initiatives in Brussels while the G20 summit was being held in India. In a candid conversation with India TV chairperson and editor-in-chief Rajat Sharma, S. Jaishankar said ‘sometimes people reveal their true position by mistake’.

    S. Jaishankar, who will appear on the show this Saturday, a week after the successful G20 Summit, said that the timing of the comment was unfortunate. Replying to Gandhi’s urge for an ‘alternate vision’ to China’s coercive production model, Jaishankar says, “Look at the timing. India is organising the greatest event in history, where we should all come together and appreciate it, yet at that time, he is going out and condemning the country.”

    “Sometimes people reveal their true positions by mistake. Like when he praised the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) when it passes through the Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). However, he refrained from stating that it infringes India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity,” he added.

    Speaking about the Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, he stated that PoK is an integral part of India and will remain so. He added that, “We have inherited the problem of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir” and it is difficult to say what will happen in the future. The former foreign secretary turned politician, also shared some inside details of the G20 summit and how India successfully gained consensus on the G20 Delhi declaration. Additionally, he explained how it would help the world at large and open doors of new opportunities.

    Renowned for his articulate and strategic communication skills in the world of international relations, EAM Jaishankar also touched upon several topics of international importance.

    In Rajat Sharma’s headline-making program ‘Aap Ki Adalat’, he spoke about Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), India’s ties with China, the rising Khalistan movement in Canada and India’s United Nations Security Council (UNSC) permanent membership.

    The union minister also shared his journey from a diplomat to a cabinet minister. This episode of the ‘Aap Ki Adalat’ will be aired on India TV on Saturday at 10 PM and repeated on Sunday at 10 AM and 10 PM.