News Broadcasting

The after-effect of Arnab Goswami’s exit

Published

9 years ago

November 2, 2016

MUMBAI: Seldom in the media industry, there are days when the newscaster becomes the breaking news. November 1 was one such day. November 1 was Arnab Goswami’s last day in office. Tuesday’s episode of The Newshour was Goswami’s last.

The dynamic broadcast journalist who is often credited with pioneering debate-style news programming in India has called it a day as the editor-in-chief of the news channel — Times Now.

Since the news surfaced, the media world has gone loony trying to guess ‘what is next for Arnab?’ Some speculate that Goswami plans to start his own independent media venture with digital media leanings, based on the strong hints that he had earlier dropped at a conference.

Amid the hue and cry of ‘The nation wants to know’ what Goswami is up to post-Times Now, a question that hasn’t been entertained is — what does Arnab Goswami’s exit from Times Now mean for the channel and its network?

While the channel hasn’t come out with an official statement (until the filing of this article) to address Goswami’s resignation, or its plans to find a replacement of Goswami, both as the face of the channel as well as the host of The Newshour, it goes without saying that the channel’s flagship prime time debate show ‘The Newshour’ that brings the channel its highest ad rates will not retain its brand identity without Goswami’s emphatic voice and pointed questions.

Credited to most often boasting a full ad inventory, the show’s contribution to the network’s revenues is uncontested, and rumoured to be north of Rs 100 crore.

A media expert requesting anonymity outright rejected the Rs 100-crore plus effect on Times revenue that is being bandied about in the news industry circles. According to this expert, the total revenue of Times Network was in the range of Rs 160-170 crore; how could the effect of the departure of an anchor be three-fourths of that figure?

Although he admitted that it would definitely dent Times Network’s revenues, he was not willing to put a figure to it. He however acknowledged that The Newshour revenue commanded 8-10x the overall ‘Times Now’ channel’s ER. He sought to extrapolate a figure at the rate of Rs 20,000 per 10-second ad slot of the program.

While other media experts shied away from commenting on the immediate monetary effect that Goswami’s decision would cost the network, most unanimously agreed that this event will definitely have significant repercussions.

“Arnab has created a distinct identity within the English News consumers mind space. Newshour commands a premium over the channel’s operating rates to the tune of 10X, and that will have its impact on perception and pricing of the show. Having said that, organisations are larger than individuals, and Times is an entity that is a seasoned media / news group,” said Reliance Broadcast Network Limited’s chief business officer Vikas Khanchandani.

Echoing similar sentiments was Dentsu Aegis Network south Asia chairman Ashish Bhasin. “Whenever someone as prominent and established as Arnab Goswami, who was akin to the face of Times Now the channel, leaves, it does shake up the network. I foresee a period of settling down on the part of the channel, post-Goswami’s resignation. Having said that, I believe organisations are larger than individuals and they will find an appropriate content replacement and a presenter on air.”

Commenting on the ad rates of the show post-Goswami, Bhasin shared, “Tying it (Goswami’s resignation) to a loss in the network’s revenue and business will be making a hasty judgement. Ad rates aren’t as spontaneous as the stock exchange. The first effect, if any, will be on the viewership numbers. Only if the viewership numbers continue to drop for a prolonged period of time will there be an effect on the ad rates.”

Whether Goswami’s goodbye will blow a hole in Times Now’s pockets or whether The Newshour will retain its glory amid loyal advertisers, or whether the network will replace the debate show with an equally engaging content are things that we can’t put a finger on for certain. What we do know for sure is that Goswami quitting Times Now is unprecedented in the industry.

Said senior journalist in CNN-News18 is Bhupendra Chaubey: I have not worked with him for almost 10 years now but, what I remember of him as a colleague in NDTV, he is a bright companion. I wish him all the luck with whatever he plans to do.

Similarly senior media executive and BTVi COO Monica Tata too expressed her shock upon hearing the news. “Waiting to hear more news about his future plans,” she added.

Up Next

The after-effect of Arnab Goswami’s exit

Don't Miss

From reporting news to becoming news

Click to comment

News Broadcasting

Barc forensic audit in TRP row awaits as Twenty-Four probe gathers pace

Published

1 month ago

February 4, 2026

indiantelevision.com Team

KERALA: A forensic audit commissioned by the Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) India has emerged as the centrepiece of the government’s response to fresh allegations of television rating point manipulation involving a regional news channel in Kerala, with both the audit findings and a parallel police investigation still awaited.

Replying to a query in the Lok Sabha, minister of state for information and broadcasting L Murugan, said Barc had appointed an independent agency to conduct a forensic probe into the conduct of senior personnel allegedly linked to the case.

The move followed media reports claiming that a Barc employee had accepted bribes to manipulate viewership data in favour of a regional television news channel.

“The report from BARC is still awaited,” Murugan told Parliament, signalling that the forensic exercise remains ongoing.

Industry specialists say forensic audits are crucial in alleged TRP fraud cases, as they examine internal controls, data access trails, panel household integrity, staff communications and financial transactions. The outcome could determine whether the alleged manipulation was an isolated breach or a deeper systemic weakness in India’s television measurement framework.

Running alongside the audit, the Kerala Police has formed a special investigation team to probe the allegations. The ministry has sought a preliminary report from the state’s director general of police, including details of action taken on the first information report. That report, too, is yet to be submitted.

The episode has revived long-standing concerns over the vulnerability of India’s TRP system, particularly in regional news markets where competition for ratings is fierce and advertising revenues hinge on weekly viewership rankings.

India’s sole television audience measurement body Barc, has faced scrutiny before, most notably during the nationwide TRP controversy involving news channels in 2020. While tighter compliance norms were introduced in the aftermath, the latest allegations suggest enforcement challenges may persist.

On regulatory consequences, the government said any punitive action against television channels, including suspension or cancellation of uplinking and downlinking permissions, would be governed by the Policy Guidelines for Uplinking and Downlinking of Television Channels issued in November 2022, and would depend on investigation outcomes and due process.

The ministry also pointed to ongoing efforts to overhaul the ratings ecosystem. Television measurement continues to be regulated under the Policy Guidelines for Television Rating Agencies, 2014. Draft amendments were released for public consultation in July 2025, followed by a revised version in November 2025, aimed at tightening audit mechanisms and improving transparency and representativeness.

In November 2025, Barc said it had taken note of allegations aired by Malayalam news channel Twenty-Four, which linked an internal employee to irregularities in audience measurement. The council said it had engaged a “reputed independent agency” to conduct a comprehensive forensic audit, underscoring the seriousness of the claims.

The ratings system sits at the heart of India’s broadcast advertising economy, shaping billions of rupees in annual ad spends. With trust in audience data once again under strain, advertisers, broadcasters and regulators are closely watching the outcome of the investigations.

Barc has urged industry stakeholders and media organisations to exercise restraint while the probe is underway, calling for an end to “unverified or speculatory claims” and reiterating its commitment to integrity and accountability.

Until the forensic audit and police findings are submitted and reviewed, the government said it would refrain from drawing conclusions.

News Broadcasting

Rajat Sharma defamation row: Delhi court summons Congress leaders Ragini Nayak, Pawan Khera and Jairam Ramesh

Published

1 month ago

February 4, 2026

indiantelevision.com Team

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has ordered the summoning of senior Congress leaders Ragini Nayak, Pawan Khera and Jairam Ramesh in a criminal case filed by veteran journalist Rajat Sharma, sharpening a legal battle over alleged defamation and doctored digital content.

The order was passed on Monday by Devanshi Janmeja, judicial magistrate first class at Saket Courts, after the court found prima facie grounds to proceed under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including forgery, creation of false electronic records and defamation.

Sharma, chairman and editor-in-chief of India TV, had approached the court over allegations made in June 2024 that he had used derogatory language against Congress spokesperson Ragini Nayak during a live television debate. He denied the charge, claiming it was fuelled by a manipulated video circulated online.

According to the complaint, a clipped version of the broadcast carrying superimposed captions, which were not part of the original programme, was first shared on social media platform X by Nayak and later amplified through retweets and public statements by Khera and Ramesh. Sharma said the viral spread caused serious reputational harm and personal distress.

The court took note of forensic science laboratory findings that pointed to visible post-production alterations in the video, including added titles and captions. It also cited witness testimonies from those present during the live broadcast, who stated that no abusive or objectionable language had been used.

In a related civil matter, the Delhi High Court had earlier observed a prima facie absence of abusive remarks and directed the removal of the disputed social media posts.

With criminal proceedings now set in motion, the case adds to mounting scrutiny around political messaging, digital manipulation and accountability on social media platforms.

News Broadcasting

Mukesh Ambani, Larry Fink come together for CNBC-TV18 exclusive

Reliance and BlackRock chiefs map the future of investing as global capital eyes India

Published

1 month ago

February 4, 2026

indiantelevision.com Team

MUMBAI: India’s capital story takes centre stage today as Mukesh Ambani and Larry Fink sit down for a rare joint television conversation, bringing together two of the most powerful voices in global business at a moment of economic churn and opportunity.

The Reliance Industries chief and the BlackRock boss will speak with Shereen Bhan, managing editor of CNBC-TV18, in an exclusive interaction airing from 3:00 pm on February 4. The timing is deliberate. Geopolitics are tense, technology is disruptive and capital is choosier. India, meanwhile, is pitching itself as a long-term bet.

The pairing is symbolic. Reliance straddles energy transition, digital infrastructure and consumer growth in the world’s fastest-expanding major economy. BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, oversees more than $14 tn in assets and sits at the nerve centre of global capital flows. When the two talk, markets tend to listen.

Fink’s appearance marks his third India visit, a signal of the country’s rising strategic weight for the Wall Street-listed firm, which carries a market value above $177 bn. His earlier 2023 trips included an October stop in New Delhi, where he met both Ambani and Narendra Modi.

India is now central to BlackRock’s expansion plans, notably through its joint venture with Jio Financial Services. Announced in July 2023, the 50:50 venture, JioBlackRock, commits up to $150 mn each from the partners to build a digital-first asset-management platform aimed at India’s swelling investor class.

The backdrop is robust. BlackRock ended 2025 with record assets under management of $14.04 tn, helped by $698 bn in net inflows, including $342 bn in the fourth quarter alone. Scale gives Fink both heft and a long lens on where money is moving.

He has been openly bullish on India. At the Saudi-US Investment Summit in Riyadh last year, Fink argued that the “fog of global uncertainty is lifting”, with capital returning to dynamic markets such as India, drawn by reforms, demographics and durable return potential.

Expect the conversation to range beyond balance sheets, into technology’s role in finance, access to capital and the mechanics of sustainable growth in a fracturing world order. For investors and policymakers alike, it is a snapshot of how big money is thinking about India.

At a time when capital is cautious and growth is contested, India wants to be the exception. When Ambani and Fink share a stage, it is less a chat and more a signal. The world’s money is still looking for its next big story, and India intends to be it.