English Entertainment

Star World on a route to decode men

Published

12 years ago

January 10, 2014

MUMBAI: With the rising number of feminists and groups supporting the female issues, the issues concerning men in India have almost never been paid much heed to. Not just at the level of making laws, but the concerns of men have been neglected even on entertainment channels with almost no show aimed at them. But fret not! Here’s something to change that.

Following its success of distinguished celebrity chat shows like Koffee With Karan and the Front Row with Anupama Chopra, English entertainment channel Star World is experimenting with a new show centered around men. Gentlemen’s Code, a six-episode series being hosted by author-journalist Aatish Taseer, which launches this Sunday at 8 pm, attempts to break the code that is the new-age man and delve into the very essence of what it takes to be a modern man.

For a channel that is always open to new content, this show is an opportunity to reach out to new viewers. Star English channels business head Kevin Vaz says that since this is one of its kind shows it makes it even more interesting for the viewers. “We look for content that brings a fantastic television experience to our viewers.”

From hunter-gatherers to stay-at-home fathers, men have refashioned and redefined their roles over centuries. Even as the balance of economic, political and social power remains firmly entrenched in their favour, collectively, men have perhaps never faced as much scrutiny, pressure and competition as they do today. The show is an effort to get men to tell what makes them tick and to showcase what they really want. “The content is new, fresh and extremely dynamic and we think that it will be very well received by audiences,” says Vaz as he adds that the choice of someone as unconventional as Aatish Taseer as a host comes out of the fact that he is extremely well-spoken and is the quintessential gentleman.

Aatish on his part, says that while there are many competing views as to what the show is about, his feeling is that it is a show about Indian masculinity at a time when that notion is more fluid—more in flux—than ever before. “The aim of the Gentlemen’s Code is to take a hard look at the psyche of the urban Indian man, but with sympathy, acknowledging that as much as Indian masculinity seems to be going through a kind of crisis, it is as, with all crises, also a time of hope and change,” he says.

And though Aatish, who has authored books like Stranger to History: a Son’s Journey Through Islamic Lands’ (2009); the highly acclaimed translation – Manto: Selected Stories’ (2008); and the novel, The Temple-Goers’ (2010) that was shortlisted for the 2010 Costa First Novel Award, is a self confessed “hopeless TV viewer”.

“I don’t watch much TV at all, save for the news. But I like to think of this as a kind of advantage. I like to believe that it brings a certain freshness to my style and perspective. The production process for someone who has worked in solitude for many years is hard. But there is also something exciting about the energy of other people, something exciting about collaboration,” he remarks.

The most fascinating aspect for Aatish has been the attention that he had to pay to a certain external reality. “After years of concentrating on my interior life, I’ve suddenly been forced to project my personality, to find some kind of balance between how one is and how one comes across. Not easy,” he says.

And since he talks about collaborating with other people, it’s interesting to note that the show is going to have a host of different personalities from various professions including a few celebs like Priyanka Chopra, Anoushka Shankar, John Abraham and R Balki to name a few, there will also be prominent names like Barkha Dutt and Chetan Bhagat on the show.

Every week, Aatish will conduct an interview with an iconic Indian woman, so as to have the scrutiny of the female gaze on men. “A greater range of men will appear on the show too, everyone from little-known family men to big stars like Karan Johar and John Abraham. The aim is to find a shared experience, I suppose, of the themes we cover. Which range from work to sex to style and luxury,” says Aatish.

When quizzed about if there been a pressure on the production unit to make the show appealing to the masses at large by bringing in well-known people, “Our sponsors as well as the channel has been pretty generous: they’ve given us, for the most part, a free hand. But there’s no doubt, TV is a cruel medium, and there is always the pressure to crowd the show with beautiful and famous people. There is also, of course, the pressure to keep things light. But I think that’s good. That lightness of touch—that ability to deal with serious things in an appealing way—is part of television’s tremendous reach, and it should always be kept in mind. It would be a terrible waste if we did a show that no one saw,” Aatish points out.

“The target viewers of the show are the English audience, who is always looking at fresh differentiated content,” says Star India English cluster VP, marketing head, Pallavi Tibrewal. And despite of many differentiated content being aired on many competitor channels, she thinks this show is going to do well. “There is always an audience for everything, I am sure this show will do well too,” she says.

This magazine series that has Chivas as the title sponsor touches on themes including relationships, money, status symbols, style and friendships, amongst others. The show is being promoted on network’s English channels. “We have released one promo and we will be releasing a new episodic promo every week,” informs Tibrewal.

The new age men have something to really look forward to, while women can watch the show to decode the men in their life!

Up Next

Cineworld to buy European cinema chain

Don't Miss

Eggfirst strengthens account management team

Click to comment

English Entertainment

The end of Freeview? Britain debates switching off aerial tv by 2034

Published

2 weeks ago

January 29, 2026

indiantelevision.com Team

UK: The aerial is losing its grip. As broadband becomes the default way Britons watch television, the UK is edging towards a decisive, and divisive, question: should Freeview be switched off by 2034? The issue, highlighted in reporting by The Guardian, has exposed deep fault lines over access, affordability and the future of public service broadcasting.

For nearly 25 years, Freeview has delivered free-to-air television from the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5 to almost every corner of the country. Even now, it remains the UK’s largest TV platform, used in more than 16m homes and on around 10m main household sets. Yet the same broadcasters that built it are now pressing for its closure within eight years.

Their case rests on a structural shift in viewing. Smart TVs, superfast broadband and the Netflix-led streaming boom have pulled audiences online. Advertising economics have followed. By 2034, the number of homes using Freeview as their main TV set is forecast to fall from a peak of almost 12m in 2012 to fewer than 2m, making digital terrestrial television, or DTT, increasingly costly to sustain.

But critics say the rush to switch off risks abandoning those least able, or least willing, to move online.

“I don’t want to be choosing apps and making new accounts,” says Lynette, 80, from Kent. “It is time-consuming and irritating trying to work out where I want to be, to remember the sequence of clicks, with hieroglyphics instead of words. If I make a mistake I have to start again.”

Lynette is among nearly 100,000 people who have signed a “save Freeview” petition launched by campaign group Silver Voices. She fears the government is about to “take [Freeview] away from me and others who either don’t like, can’t afford, or can’t use online versions”.

Official figures underline the fault lines. A report commissioned by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport estimates that by 2035, 1.8m homes will still depend on Freeview. Ofcom’s analysis shows those households are more likely to be disabled, older, living alone, female, and based in the north of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Freeview is owned by the public service broadcasters through Everyone TV, which also operates Freesat and the newer streaming platform Freely. After two years of review, DCMS is expected to set out its position soon, drawing on three options proposed by Ofcom: a costly upgrade of Freeview’s ageing technology; maintaining a bare-bones service with only core PSB channels; or a full switch-off during the 2030s.

The broadcasters have rallied behind the third option. They argue that 2034 is the logical cut-off, when transmission contracts with network operator Arqiva expire. By then, they say, the cost of broadcasting to a dwindling audience will far outweigh the returns from TV advertising.

Ofcom agrees a crunch point is approaching. In July, the regulator warned of a “tipping point” within the next few years, after which it will no longer be commercially viable for broadcasters to carry the costs of DTT.

Others see risks beyond economics. Questions remain over whether internet TV can reliably deliver emergency broadcasts, such as the daily Covid updates, in the way that universally available DTT can. The UK radio industry has also warned that an internet-only future for TV could push up distribution costs and force some radio stations off air if PSBs no longer share Arqiva’s mast network.

“It is a political hot potato,” says Dennis Reed, founder of Silver Voices, who says he has “dissociated” his organisation from the government’s stakeholder forum, which he believes is “heavily biased” towards streaming.

The Future TV Taskforce, representing the PSBs, counters that moving online could “close the digital divide once and for all”. “We want to be able to plan to ensure that no one is left behind,” a spokesperson says, adding that rising DTT costs could otherwise mean cuts to programme budgets.

The numbers show the scale of the challenge. Of the 1.8m Freeview-dependent homes projected for 2035, around 1.1m are expected to have broadband but not use it for TV. The remaining 700,000 are forecast to lack a broadband connection altogether.

Veterans of the analogue switch-off, completed in 2012 after 76 years, recall similar fears of “TV blackout chaos”. Around 6 per cent of households were labelled “digital refuseniks”, yet a targeted help scheme and a national campaign, fronted by a robot called Digit Al voiced by Matt Lucas, delivered a largely smooth transition.

This time, the BBC is less keen to foot the bill. Tim Davie, the outgoing director general, has said the corporation should not fund a comparable support programme for a Freeview switch-off.

Research for Sky by Oliver & Ohlbaum suggests that with early awareness campaigns and digital inclusion measures, only about 330,000 households would ultimately need hands-on help ahead of a 2034 shutdown.

Meanwhile, viewing habits continue to fragment. Audience body Barb says 7 per cent of UK households no longer own a TV set, choosing to watch on other devices. In December, YouTube overtook the BBC’s combined channels in total UK viewing across TVs, smartphones and tablets, albeit measured at a minimum of three minutes.

That shift may accelerate. YouTube has recently blocked Barb and its partner Kantar from accessing viewing session data, limiting transparency just as online platforms consolidate power.

“When the government chose British Satellite Broadcasting as the ‘winner’ in satellite TV it was Rupert Murdoch’s Sky instead that came out on top,” says a senior TV executive quoted by The Guardian. “There already is such an outsider ready to be the winner in the transition to internet TV; it is YouTube.”

Freeview’s future now hangs on a familiar British dilemma: modernise fast and risk exclusion, or protect universality and pay the price. Either way, the aerial’s days as king of the living room look numbered.

English Entertainment

Christian Vesper steps down as Fremantle’s global film and drama CEO

Published

2 weeks ago

January 26, 2026

indiantelevision.com Team

LONDON: Christian Vesper is leaving Fremantle after ten years as ceo, global film and drama, ending a tenure that turned the company into an internationally recognised centre of excellence for drama and film. Since joining in 2016, Vesper expanded Fremantle’s scripted footprint, overseeing or exec producing over 80 films and series in the last five years, with the 100th slated for release in 2026.

Vesper shepherded hits including Bugonia, Pillion, Queer, Maria, The Chronology of Water, Picnic at Hanging Rock, The Luminaries, On Becoming a Guinea Fowl, and the upcoming Rachel Weisz starrer Séance on a Wet Afternoon. Festival favourites and critical darlings under his watch include Without Blood (Angelina Jolie, Salma Hayek), M. Son of the Century (Joe Wright, Luca Marinelli), Faithless (Tomas Alfredson, Frida Gustavsson), Cannes winner My Father’s Shadow, and The Listeners (Janicza Bravo, Rebecca Hall). He also set up the Fox revival of Baywatch.

Vesper forged a formidable slate of first-look and creative collaborations with global talent, including Emma Stone and Dave McCary’s Fruit Tree Production; Kristen Stewart, Dylan Meyer and Maggie McLean’s Nevermind Pictures; Pablo and Juan de Dios Larraín’s Fabula; Rachel Weisz and Polly Stokes’ Astral Projection; Edward Berger’s Nine Hours; Johan Renck and Michael Parets’ Sinestra Films; Sarah Condon’s Fair Harbour; and Richard Yee and Krishnendu Majumdar’s Me+You Productions.

Based in London, Vesper reported to Andrea Scrosati, group coo and ceo continental Europe, who will now oversee the film and drama division on an interim basis alongside the wider leadership team.

Scrosati said: “Christian’s vision has built the credibility of our drama and film slate. With him at the helm, we delivered consistent success and critical acclaim. We appreciate that he now wishes to focus on new horizons, and we all wish him well.”

Vesper said: “After 10 years, the time is right to step down. Fremantle has been a huge part of my life. I’m proud of what we’ve achieved — the 100th film this year underlines the progress made. We’ve built a dedicated, talented team, and I know they will take our film and drama business to even greater heights. Now is the perfect moment for my next adventure.”

Before Fremantle, Vesper spent 14 years at Sundance TV overseeing scripted projects and co-productions including Rectify, The Honorable Woman, The Last Panthers, Top of the Lake and Deutschland 83. He also held roles at HBO, iFilm, October Films and USA Films.

From festival acclaim to awards galore — four academy awards, two golden globes, five baftas, eight cannes winners, seven venice winners including the golden lion — Vesper leaves Fremantle’s film and drama operations in a position of strength, a legacy of ambition, vision and global impact, and a company poised for even bigger hits.

English Entertainment

Paramount extends deadline on Warner Bros. hostile bid

Published

3 weeks ago

January 23, 2026

indiantelevision.com Team

NEW YORK: Paramount Skydance has gone on the offensive against Warner Bros Discovery, calling its amended merger with Netflix an admission of weakness and still a bad deal.

In a sharply worded filing late on January 22, Paramount said the revised Netflix agreement “falls well short” of its own $30-per-share all-cash offer and urged WBD shareholders to vote it down at a forthcoming special meeting. The company has also extended its tender offer to February 20, buying time as it presses for regulatory clearance.

At the heart of the attack is money and certainty. Under the Netflix transaction, WBD shareholders would receive $27.75 a share in cash, assuming the group can offload $17bn of debt on to the spun-out Discovery Global business. If that assumption fails, the payout shrinks, dollar for dollar.

Paramount argues it almost certainly will fail. Based on leverage levels at Versant Media, a close peer, Discovery Global could sustain only about $5.1bn of net debt. That would push roughly $11.9bn back on to WBD’s studios and streaming arm, cutting the implied cash consideration from Netflix to about $23.20 a share.

WBD’s own advisers appear to share the scepticism. Discounted cash-flow analyses valued Discovery Global’s equity as low as $0.72 a share. Paramount has previously pegged it at between zero and 50 cents. Yet WBD is asking shareholders to approve the Netflix deal without disclosing the final capital structure of Discovery Global, despite admitting they “will not know or be able to determine” the actual merger consideration at closing.

Paramount says that rush is no accident. Once approved, the Netflix deal would shut the door on what it calls a value-maximising alternative, a $108.4bn enterprise-value transaction, all cash, with far less regulatory baggage than Netflix’s $82.7bn-equivalent proposal.

That baggage matters. Paramount warns that a Netflix-WBD tie-up would further entrench market concentration, handing Netflix an estimated 43 per cent of global subscription video-on-demand customers. Prices would rise, creators would lose leverage and cinemas would suffer, it argues. Regulators, especially in Europe where Netflix already dominates and HBO Max is its main rival, are unlikely to be persuaded by Netflix’s attempt to define the market as including YouTube, TikTok and Instagram.

By contrast, Paramount pitches its own bid as pro-competitive, bolstering theatrical output and strengthening Hollywood’s creative ecosystem.

The gloves also come off on governance. Paramount says the WBD board publicly defended the original Netflix deal even as it renegotiated it, refused to engage with Paramount once talks with Netflix reopened and continues to withhold “highly material” information while racing to a vote.

Shareholders appear to be listening. As of late on January 21, more than 168.5m WBD shares had been tendered into Paramount’s offer.

The message from Paramount is blunt. The Netflix deal is smaller, shakier and riskier. The cash is on the table, the clock is ticking and shareholders now have a choice to make.