Connect with us

I&B Ministry

Maharashtra LCO associations release a statement on AIDCF vs Broadcasters fight

Published

on

Mumbai : Maharashtra  LCO associations MCOF and  DCOAM have released a statement to clear their stand on the ongoing tussle between AIDCF and broadcasters. 

The release from LCO associations is as follow

Broadcasters like Star, Sony & Zee have shut off AIDCF members who have taken a stand that they will not sign the Interconnect agreements with Broadcasters due to their asking for exorbitant rate hikes. They then go on to give a press release that says that increases could be as high as 60 per cent . But they do not show a single case of such an increase which any customer can see and understand. 

As an LCO Association DCOAM was corresponding with Hathway but they find that their Association’s official email id is blocked by Hathway. Thereafter individual members have been writing emails but not a single email has ever been responded to yet. 

Right now we have received news that KCCL, one of the 2 petitioners in that case in Kerala HC has signed the agreement.

Advertisement

Now that broadcasters are also joining the litigation, this matter is going to get extended. A HC judge has little experience of Broadcasting and Distributions laws, so he/she has to first understand the Regulations first before passing any orders. The double standards of MSOs to says that since matter is sub judice, hence no action should be taken by any Broadcasters goes entirely against them, as when they wanted the NTO to be rolled out in Feb 2019 they forced NTO 1.0 on LCOs when so many pending cases where filed in different High Courts. 

That all MSOs turned PAT positive immediately thereafter shows how they have profited at the cost of LCOs who’s revenue streams have dwindled due to their muscle power. If we refer to the Table 2.3 TRAI Consultation Paper on Market Structure and Competition in CATV dated 25 october 2021 , one will observe that MSOs serve direct customers only in upto 2 per cent  cases and the rest 98 per cent  is served by LCOs. Hence it is we who have been facing the brunt of customer calls in the past 6 days. The most basic question that every customer asks is What is the revised pricing going to be for my existing pack ? 

When we seek answers to this Question there is not one person ready to provide answers in any MSO. Second question they ask is I have paid already but why did you disconnect services without any prior notice. This is a very difficult situation for us as MSOs have introduced prepaid wallet system for all of us. So we need to pay the MSO immediately and then only can any pack/channel be activated. MSOs get around 2 months of activation to pass on the payments to Broadcasters due to the submission of weekly reports and then calculating the invoice amounts. Even today when channels are not there we continue to pay MSOs the full rates for packages with no sign of refunds. But our customers are demanding reductions for lack of services.

Even during the first wave of Covid all LCOs paid in spite of not being able to send staff for collections and we had many bad debts as many customers had fled to native places. Those bad debts have been borne by LCOs only. The third question that customers ask is why are the channels available on DTH and some MSOs? When DTH and many MSOs have signed up already, AIDCF is unwilling to say in Court that they will abide by Court orders as and when the matter is decided, hence please get signals restored. Hence we ventured out to see the impact of additional content cost if we are to retain same package structure. The results for Maharashtra where Hindi & Marathi are the dominant languages is shown below

We have seen that in any industry when prices increase, the Co. tries to retain the same product but will reduce the weight and/or size so that the impact to customers is nil/minimal. In the above case too we can sit and work out what customers will find critical and what is expendable to minimize rate increases. But are MSOs ready to talk with us. ? So that brings us to the Question of what is this fight all about ? A reading of their petition filed in Kerala HC indicates that their major grouse is : “7(4) It shall be permissible to a broadcaster to offer discounts, on the maximum retail price of pay channel or bouquet of pay channels, to distributors of television channels, not exceeding fifteen percent of the maximum retail price:”

Advertisement

This revenue is not at all shared with LCOs and is the point of dispute with the Broadcasters. Price increase is a mere façade. Customers and LCOs are just being used as pawns to help them achieve their MSO revenues

Today is the 6th day of a blackout that we have little control over and we wish that through this Press Release we can convey to customers the helpless situation that we face in a highly competitive market. As LCOs we will be taking our legal steps too and will be filling our grouses in appropriate forums. This event should never happen again. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I&B Ministry

MIB sets OTT accessibility rules, mandates captions and audio description

Platforms get three years to add features for hearing and visually impaired

Published

on

NEW DELHI: The government has asked OTT platforms to make their shows easier to watch and hear. A new set of accessibility guidelines from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting requires streaming services to add features for viewers with hearing and visual impairments.

The move follows the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and is meant to bring streaming closer to the promise of equal access. In simple terms, if a film or series is coming to an OTT platform, it should not arrive empty-handed. It should come with captions for those who cannot hear well and audio descriptions for those who cannot see clearly.

The guidelines ask platforms to provide at least one accessibility feature each for hearing-impaired and visually-impaired viewers. That could be closed captions, open captions, Indian Sign Language interpretation, or audio description. The aim is to make content understandable without turning the viewing experience into a technical chore.

There is, however, a long runway. Platforms have up to thirty six months from the date of the guidelines to ensure that all newly released content carries these accessibility features. Older titles in their libraries are not under strict timelines, but companies are encouraged to add features gradually.

The rules also go beyond the show itself. User interfaces, whether on mobile apps, smart TVs or websites, must be designed to work with assistive technologies. Accessibility labels such as CC for captions, AD for audio description and ISL for sign language must be displayed clearly so viewers know what to expect before pressing play.

Advertisement

Some content types get a free pass. Live events, music, podcasts, and short form content like ads are exempt because of practical challenges in real time captioning and description.

OTT publishers will also need to file accessibility conformance reports. The first report is due three years from now, followed by quarterly updates. Complaints from viewers will follow a three tier system, starting with the platform itself, moving to self-regulatory bodies, and finally reaching a government monitoring committee if needed.

For the streaming industry, the message is clear. Accessibility is no longer a nice extra tucked away in settings. It is fast becoming part of the main feature, and in a country where streaming audiences run into the hundreds of millions, that could make a very big difference to who gets to enjoy the show.

Continue Reading

I&B Ministry

I&B’s 2025 report card: Lights, camera, action — and Rs 4,334 crore

Published

on

NEW DELHI: If 2025 was India’s year to make waves, the ministry of information and broadcasting (I&B) was its chief surfboard maker. Prime minister Narendra Modi’s call to “create in India, create for the world” wasn’t just ministerial hot air—it triggered a tsunami of creative dealmaking that swept from Melbourne to Madrid, generating Rs 4,334 crores in potential business discussions and putting Indian creators on every continent’s radar.

The centrepiece was Waves 2025, the World Audio Visual and Entertainment Summit, which drew over 90 countries, 10,000 delegates, and roughly 1 lakh punters through its doors. Modi himself dropped by to glad-hand young creators, describing the event as a “wave of culture, creativity and universal connectivity”—and for once, the hyperbole wasn’t entirely unwarranted.

The summit’s CreatoSphere platform, which sounds like something from a sci-fi novel but is actually a hub for film, VFX, animation, gaming, and digital media, launched the Create in India Challenges. Season one attracted over 1 lakh entries from more than 60 countries across 33 categories. Winners weren’t just handed certificates and sent packing—they performed at Melbourne, exhibited at Tokyo Game Show, and pitched at Toronto International Film Festival. I&B minister Ashwini Vaishnav handed out gongs to 150 creators, cementing the government’s commitment to nurturing what it calls the “creative economy.”

WaveX, the startup arm, proved equally industrious. It coaxed over 200 startups into its embrace, enabled 30 to pitch to Microsoft, Amazon, and Lumikai, and somehow got two of its charges—VYGR News and VIVA Technologies—onto Shark Tank India, where they presumably dodged the usual mauling. The initiative’s KalaaSetu and BhashaSetu challenges, focused on AI-driven video generation and real-time translation respectively, attracted over 100 startups and picked ten for collaboration with government media units.

Waves Bazaar, the “craft-to-commerce” global e-marketplace, went on a roadshow between August and December, hitting 12 international events across four continents and four domestic jamborees. The numbers are eye-watering: over 9,000 B2B meetings, 10 memoranda of understanding signed, three more proposed, and the launch of creative corridors with Japan, Korea, and Australia. The ministry claims Rs 4,334 crores in potential deals—potential being the operative word, though in India’s booming content market, optimism often precedes reality by only a few quarters.

On the bricks-and-mortar front, the Indian Institute of Creative Technology opened its temporary Mumbai campus in July with Rs 391.15 crores in budgetary support. The public-private partnership with Ficci and CII has enrolled over 100 students across 18 courses, incubated eight startups, and signed memoranda with Google, Meta, Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Adobe, and WPP—a who’s who of tech giants keen to tap India’s creative reserves. A permanent 10 acre campus at Film City, Goregaon, complete with an immersive AR/VR/XR studio, is in the works.

Elsewhere, the ministry set up a Live Events Development Cell to position India’s concert economy as a growth driver. A single-window clearance system is being built on the India Cine Hub platform to expedite permissions for fire, traffic, and municipal approvals—addressing the red-tape nightmares that have long plagued event organisers. Meanwhile, an inter-ministerial committee is tackling digital piracy, that perennial thorn in the creative economy’s side.

State broadcaster Doordarshan snagged the Election Commission’s media award for voter awareness during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, presented by the president on National Voters’ Day. Community radio added 22 new stations, bringing the total to 551, with workshops and a national sammelan held during Waves to strengthen local broadcasting.

The 56th International Film Festival of India in Goa screened over 240 films from 81 countries, threw in the country’s first AI Film Festival, and staged a grand parade through Panaji that turned the event into a street-level celebration. The accompanying Waves Film Bazaar drew over 2,500 delegates from 40-plus countries and showcased 320 projects—making it one of South Asia’s largest film markets.

The Central Board of Film Certification modernised too, launching a multilingual certification module that allows multiple language versions under a single application, and mandating 50 per cent women’s participation on examining and revising committees. Digital signatures replaced wet ink, and certificates became downloadable—small victories in the fight against bureaucratic inertia.

India’s I&B  ministry ended 2025 having turned content creation into something resembling an industrial policy. Whether Rs 4,334 crores in “potential” business materialises remains to be seen, but the ministry has built the infrastructure, corralled the startups, and put Indian creators on international stages. As  Modi might say, the wave has been ridden. Now comes the hard part: keeping the momentum going when the cameras stop rolling.

Continue Reading

I&B Ministry

Centre drafts OTT rules to boost access for hearing disabled

Published

on

MUMBAI: The Centre has inched closer to making India’s streaming universe easier to watch, hear and enjoy for everyone. The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has released draft guidelines that aim to standardise accessibility on OTT platforms, ensuring that viewers with hearing and visual impairments are no longer left out of the country’s digital entertainment boom.

Issued on 7 October and now open for public consultation, the draft rules arrive with constitutional and global backing. Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting L. Murugan told the Rajya Sabha that the framework draws from Article 14, the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. It also mirrors the Code of Ethics under the IT Rules, 2021.

At the heart of the proposal is a two-phase rollout of mandatory accessibility tools such as same-language closed captions and audio descriptions. The ministry said penalties and enforcement steps will be shaped after the consultation, but compliance will be tracked through progressive targets for OTT content libraries.

Parliament was also reminded that the broadcast sector has walked this path before. In 2019, the government notified accessibility standards for television programming, starting with Prasar Bharati and eventually extending them to private broadcasters.

With OTT viewership climbing across urban and small-town India, the draft rules attempt to bring streaming giants in step with a wider vision of inclusive media. The government hopes the move will help millions of Indians with disabilities press play without barriers.

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading
Advertisement CNN News18
Advertisement whatsapp
Advertisement ALL 3 Media
Advertisement Year Enders

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Indian Television Dot Com PVT LTD