Connect with us

News Broadcasting

Issuing an ordinance – the process

Published

on

If the government decides to go ahead with the promulgation of an Ordinance (executive order) by the President of India making implementation of conditional access system (CAS) in Indian cable and satellite homes a policy decision, then a Cabinet nod has to be taken again.

Quizzed on the issue of an Ordinance, a senior official of the information & broadcasting ministry admitted to indiantelevision.com:
“If the government decides to go ahead with the Ordinance without waiting for ratification from the Upper House of Parliament during the monsoon session of Parliament, beginning sometime in the third week of July, then it has to prove that the issue of CAS is of national importance.”

However, the official also added that at present no decision has been taken on the issue as the I&B ministry “will wait for minister Sushma Swaraj to return from her trip to Cannes where she had gone heading a strong team from the world of Indian entertainment.”

Still, here’s a step-by-step guide of how an Ordinance on CAS can be promulgated if Swaraj is able to bulldoze her way through opposition.

Step 1: The I&B ministry prepares a three-four page cabinet note on CAS highlighting the salient features of the amendments to be brought about in the CATV Networks Regulation Act, 1995. The note will be circulated to the Cabinet secretariat and the ministry of law and justice.

Advertisement

“Opinion of ministry of law is crucial in this matter as it will indicate whether such a move is implementable,” a government official said.

Step 2: After receiving the opinion from the law ministry, the I&B ministry will attempt to get the issue listed on the agenda of a full Cabinet meeting as soon as possible. The Cabinet note will also highlight the reason as to why the government should hurry through with this piece of legislation even before both the Houses of Parliament have discussed the issue.

“We’ll have to justify to the Cabinet why CAS is of national importance and of immense benefit to consumers at large,” the official said, adding that the Minister’s persuasive powers will play a crucial role here.

Step 3: After the Cabinet is convinced that that an Ordinance relating to CAS needs to be promulgated, the issue will be referred to the President as it’s under his name the piece of legislation will be issued.

Step 4: The President studies the matter and gives his opinion. He has two options: give his assent right away to the suggestion on the ordinance by the Cabinet or send it back for clarifications.

Advertisement

A senior government official explained: “The President generally does not refuse or turn down the Cabinet’s suggestions. He can send the file back for more comments and clarifications after which he will have to promulgate the Ordinance.”

Step 5: After the promulgation of the Ordinance, the particular legislation comes into effect from the date mentioned therein and is notified in the Gazette.

Step 6: The government, however, will have to have the Ordinance ratified in Parliament within six months of it being promulgated or it lapses. But if the government fails to get the nod of both Houses of Parliament due to pressure of more important work, it can have the Ordinance extended by another six months after which Parliament ratification is a must.

Explained the government official, “Since the Cable TV Networks Regulation Amendment Bill, 2002 has already been passed by Lok Sabha (Lower House), convincing the Cabinet and President on the importance of the amendments and CAS should not be difficult.”

So, those who had been breathing a bit easily thinking CAS is still some months away don’t pop the champagne yet. Swaraj is back in office on Monday (May 27) and may just decide to complete the unfinished CAS task.

Advertisement

News Broadcasting

Barc forensic audit in TRP row awaits as Twenty-Four probe gathers pace

Published

on

KERALA: A forensic audit commissioned by the Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) India has emerged as the centrepiece of the government’s response to fresh allegations of television rating point manipulation involving a regional news channel in Kerala, with both the audit findings and a parallel police investigation still awaited.

Replying to a query in the Lok Sabha, minister of state for information and broadcasting L Murugan, said Barc had appointed an independent agency to conduct a forensic probe into the conduct of senior personnel allegedly linked to the case.

The move followed media reports claiming that a Barc employee had accepted bribes to manipulate viewership data in favour of a regional television news channel.

“The report from BARC is still awaited,” Murugan told Parliament, signalling that the forensic exercise remains ongoing.

Industry specialists say forensic audits are crucial in alleged TRP fraud cases, as they examine internal controls, data access trails, panel household integrity, staff communications and financial transactions. The outcome could determine whether the alleged manipulation was an isolated breach or a deeper systemic weakness in India’s television measurement framework.

Advertisement

Running alongside the audit, the Kerala Police has formed a special investigation team to probe the allegations. The ministry has sought a preliminary report from the state’s director general of police, including details of action taken on the first information report. That report, too, is yet to be submitted.

The episode has revived long-standing concerns over the vulnerability of India’s TRP system, particularly in regional news markets where competition for ratings is fierce and advertising revenues hinge on weekly viewership rankings.

India’s sole television audience measurement body Barc, has faced scrutiny before, most notably during the nationwide TRP controversy involving news channels in 2020. While tighter compliance norms were introduced in the aftermath, the latest allegations suggest enforcement challenges may persist.

On regulatory consequences, the government said any punitive action against television channels, including suspension or cancellation of uplinking and downlinking permissions, would be governed by the Policy Guidelines for Uplinking and Downlinking of Television Channels issued in November 2022, and would depend on investigation outcomes and due process.

The ministry also pointed to ongoing efforts to overhaul the ratings ecosystem. Television measurement continues to be regulated under the Policy Guidelines for Television Rating Agencies, 2014. Draft amendments were released for public consultation in July 2025, followed by a revised version in November 2025, aimed at tightening audit mechanisms and improving transparency and representativeness.

Advertisement

In November 2025, Barc said it had taken note of allegations aired by Malayalam news channel Twenty-Four, which linked an internal employee to irregularities in audience measurement. The council said it had engaged a “reputed independent agency” to conduct a comprehensive forensic audit, underscoring the seriousness of the claims.

The ratings system sits at the heart of India’s broadcast advertising economy, shaping billions of rupees in annual ad spends. With trust in audience data once again under strain, advertisers, broadcasters and regulators are closely watching the outcome of the investigations.

Barc has urged industry stakeholders and media organisations to exercise restraint while the probe is underway, calling for an end to “unverified or speculatory claims” and reiterating its commitment to integrity and accountability.

Until the forensic audit and police findings are submitted and reviewed, the government said it would refrain from drawing conclusions.

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News Broadcasting

Rajat Sharma defamation row: Delhi court summons Congress leaders Ragini Nayak, Pawan Khera and Jairam Ramesh

Published

on

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has ordered the summoning of senior Congress leaders Ragini Nayak, Pawan Khera and Jairam Ramesh in a criminal case filed by veteran journalist Rajat Sharma, sharpening a legal battle over alleged defamation and doctored digital content.

The order was passed on Monday by Devanshi Janmeja, judicial magistrate first class at Saket Courts, after the court found prima facie grounds to proceed under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including forgery, creation of false electronic records and defamation.

Sharma, chairman and editor-in-chief of India TV, had approached the court over allegations made in June 2024 that he had used derogatory language against Congress spokesperson Ragini Nayak during a live television debate. He denied the charge, claiming it was fuelled by a manipulated video circulated online.

According to the complaint, a clipped version of the broadcast carrying superimposed captions, which were not part of the original programme, was first shared on social media platform X by Nayak and later amplified through retweets and public statements by Khera and Ramesh. Sharma said the viral spread caused serious reputational harm and personal distress.

The court took note of forensic science laboratory findings that pointed to visible post-production alterations in the video, including added titles and captions. It also cited witness testimonies from those present during the live broadcast, who stated that no abusive or objectionable language had been used.

Advertisement

In a related civil matter, the Delhi High Court had earlier observed a prima facie absence of abusive remarks and directed the removal of the disputed social media posts.

With criminal proceedings now set in motion, the case adds to mounting scrutiny around political messaging, digital manipulation and accountability on social media platforms.

Continue Reading

News Broadcasting

Mukesh Ambani, Larry Fink come together for CNBC-TV18 exclusive

Reliance and BlackRock chiefs map the future of investing as global capital eyes India

Published

on

MUMBAI: India’s capital story takes centre stage today as Mukesh Ambani and Larry Fink sit down for a rare joint television conversation, bringing together two of the most powerful voices in global business at a moment of economic churn and opportunity.

The Reliance Industries chief and the BlackRock boss will speak with Shereen Bhan, managing editor of CNBC-TV18, in an exclusive interaction airing from 3:00 pm on February 4. The timing is deliberate. Geopolitics are tense, technology is disruptive and capital is choosier. India, meanwhile, is pitching itself as a long-term bet.

The pairing is symbolic. Reliance straddles energy transition, digital infrastructure and consumer growth in the world’s fastest-expanding major economy. BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, oversees more than $14 tn in assets and sits at the nerve centre of global capital flows. When the two talk, markets tend to listen.

Fink’s appearance marks his third India visit, a signal of the country’s rising strategic weight for the Wall Street-listed firm, which carries a market value above $177 bn. His earlier 2023 trips included an October stop in New Delhi, where he met both Ambani and Narendra Modi.

India is now central to BlackRock’s expansion plans, notably through its joint venture with Jio Financial Services. Announced in July 2023, the 50:50 venture, JioBlackRock, commits up to $150 mn each from the partners to build a digital-first asset-management platform aimed at India’s swelling investor class.

Advertisement

The backdrop is robust. BlackRock ended 2025 with record assets under management of $14.04 tn, helped by $698 bn in net inflows, including $342 bn in the fourth quarter alone. Scale gives Fink both heft and a long lens on where money is moving.

He has been openly bullish on India. At the Saudi-US Investment Summit in Riyadh last year, Fink argued that the “fog of global uncertainty is lifting”, with capital returning to dynamic markets such as India, drawn by reforms, demographics and durable return potential.

Expect the conversation to range beyond balance sheets, into technology’s role in finance, access to capital and the mechanics of sustainable growth in a fracturing world order. For investors and policymakers alike, it is a snapshot of how big money is thinking about India.

At a time when capital is cautious and growth is contested, India wants to be the exception. When Ambani and Fink share a stage, it is less a chat and more a signal. The world’s money is still looking for its next big story, and India intends to be it.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement CNN News18
Advertisement whatsapp
Advertisement ALL 3 Media
Advertisement Year Enders

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Indian Television Dot Com PVT LTD

This will close in 10 seconds

×