Connect with us

News Broadcasting

If not Sony, then who for Zee?

Published

on

Mumbai: It’s on. It’s off. It’s on again. It’s off again. The yes and no speculation about the Zee Entertainment merger with Culver Max Entertainment (Sony in India) has been crazy enough to  blow one’s brains in almost every direction.

Yesterday, Zee-baiters and haters must have gone all gleeful when Bloomberg broke the news that Sony is dis-inclined to go ahead with the fusion courtesy all the brouhaha that has been created around allegations that father Subhash Chandra and son Punit Goenka personally pocketed company-borrowed money. This despite, Punit was loathe to agree to Sony’s demand that he accede his position as CEO of the merged entity to Sony India head NP Singh. Indian media bit the bait of the “failed merger” news and went to town and proclaimed the death of the merged entity. Both Zee and Sony kept their lips zipped officially.  

Towards evening came a report that a partnership might yet be in discussion splitting the odds equally. The reason: a penalty of $100 million will have to be paid out to Zee TV by Sony should they pull out of the merger, said a few newspaper reports. Others suggested Zee had failed to live up to many conditions precedent in the merger agreement documents between the two and hence a tremendous trust deficit has been built up between the two.  (These reports have since been denied by Zee in a regulatory filing and it has claimed that it is continuing to pursue the merger agreement).

Sony has to respond to  Zee’s last month’s merger proposal and new conditions by 20-22 January and agree or disagree to the terms; it still has a lot of time to decide. Then why be in a rush to have anonymous sources make the revelation that its interest was off the table? Did the Bloomberg journo misquote the source? Or was Sony just testing how Zee would react to its disgruntlement? Would the latter take advantage of the stringent exit clause and howl or would it just walk away quietly?

Whatever be Sony’s rationale, it’s imperative that it gets clarity sooner than later. That’s because a megalith is being created with the signing of an agreement between Mukesh Ambani’s Jio (Viacom18) and Disney’s India operations under Disney + Star India. The agglomeration of the two will create a giant which will control a sizeable chunk of the market by viewership. That’s something which many are saying could  harm the development of the media & entertainment vertical in the long term, especially placing oodles of power in the hands of one giant.

Advertisement

Sectors do better when there is an equally fit No 2 giving the No 1 a run for its dollars. And a No 3 and a No 4. Muscle is needed to fight muscle. Sony, Zee, Sun TV on their own will be dwarfed in front of the Jio-Disney combine. Yes, we have gorillas like Netflix, Amazon, Google, Microsoft operating in India.  But one is not clear about how they will play their hand going forward. A few smaller players will innovate and through their nimble-footedness score a few points. But the advantage of scale of capital, content creation, distribution, and advertising inventory will lie with one major – Jio-Disney.

We have seen how Jio has changed the dynamics of the telecom as well as streaming business, thanks to its humongous 400 million plus telco subscribers. Making premium sports and entertainment content available for free to subscribers can be a good customer acquisition strategy. But for how long will that go on and that too unchallenged?

Cable TV operators have been crying foul to the regulator TRAI as the same content on cable TV and DTH is being levied at a fee to subscribers. True, the government wants to make TV available to many more though its free to air service DD FreeDish. For obvious reasons. It wants to be able to address large swathes of the  population across the nation on one platform, rather than have to engage with many more outlets. And it wants it to say what the powers-that-be want to say.

In such a scenario, it’s imperative that consolidation in the industry is encouraged. So that balance and sanity are maintained.

Let’s suppose that Sony is willing to let go of a hundred mill in penalties for calling off the merger. Will a corporate raider swoop in jostling out the promoters? Doubtful, considering media is a specialized business which is transforming so rapidly that no non-strategic corporate will be willing to lose billions of dollars in trying to set things right at Zee. Especially considering that its margins have been under pressure and how much cleaning up it needs on several fronts.

Advertisement

Then, what are the white knight options left for Zee to get scale and get out of its financial commitments to debtors as well as get infusion of cash for growth.

Private equity? Hedge funds with mountains of resources? They might be cautious, considering how Sony has fled from getting into bed with it.

Could Adani be interested? He is yet digesting his news venture NDTV and digital acquisitions, so interest from his side might be lukewarm.

Or could it be Kalanithi Maran’s Sun TV?

It seems like a good fit. Both Chandra and Maran -run entrepreneurial organisations. Both are pioneers and the latter has so much cash, he does not know what to do with it. Sun TV is strong in the south, Zee TV has strengths in Hindi and some regional languages. Sun TV is nurturing a Hindi language entertainment channel. A joint venture will see lots of benefits accruing to both. The two business groups will have to keep aside the personal and professional differences of the promoters and look at long term survival and growth.

Advertisement

But that’s in the future. Now, if Goenka and Chandra can find ways to assuage the miffed mood amongst executives in Sony headquarters, the story might have a fairy tale ending like the two want.

The author is a media analyst. The views expressed in the comment piece are his own and indiantelevision.com need not subscribe to them.

News Broadcasting

Barc forensic audit in TRP row awaits as Twenty-Four probe gathers pace

Published

on

KERALA: A forensic audit commissioned by the Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) India has emerged as the centrepiece of the government’s response to fresh allegations of television rating point manipulation involving a regional news channel in Kerala, with both the audit findings and a parallel police investigation still awaited.

Replying to a query in the Lok Sabha, minister of state for information and broadcasting L Murugan, said Barc had appointed an independent agency to conduct a forensic probe into the conduct of senior personnel allegedly linked to the case.

The move followed media reports claiming that a Barc employee had accepted bribes to manipulate viewership data in favour of a regional television news channel.

“The report from BARC is still awaited,” Murugan told Parliament, signalling that the forensic exercise remains ongoing.

Industry specialists say forensic audits are crucial in alleged TRP fraud cases, as they examine internal controls, data access trails, panel household integrity, staff communications and financial transactions. The outcome could determine whether the alleged manipulation was an isolated breach or a deeper systemic weakness in India’s television measurement framework.

Advertisement

Running alongside the audit, the Kerala Police has formed a special investigation team to probe the allegations. The ministry has sought a preliminary report from the state’s director general of police, including details of action taken on the first information report. That report, too, is yet to be submitted.

The episode has revived long-standing concerns over the vulnerability of India’s TRP system, particularly in regional news markets where competition for ratings is fierce and advertising revenues hinge on weekly viewership rankings.

India’s sole television audience measurement body Barc, has faced scrutiny before, most notably during the nationwide TRP controversy involving news channels in 2020. While tighter compliance norms were introduced in the aftermath, the latest allegations suggest enforcement challenges may persist.

On regulatory consequences, the government said any punitive action against television channels, including suspension or cancellation of uplinking and downlinking permissions, would be governed by the Policy Guidelines for Uplinking and Downlinking of Television Channels issued in November 2022, and would depend on investigation outcomes and due process.

The ministry also pointed to ongoing efforts to overhaul the ratings ecosystem. Television measurement continues to be regulated under the Policy Guidelines for Television Rating Agencies, 2014. Draft amendments were released for public consultation in July 2025, followed by a revised version in November 2025, aimed at tightening audit mechanisms and improving transparency and representativeness.

Advertisement

In November 2025, Barc said it had taken note of allegations aired by Malayalam news channel Twenty-Four, which linked an internal employee to irregularities in audience measurement. The council said it had engaged a “reputed independent agency” to conduct a comprehensive forensic audit, underscoring the seriousness of the claims.

The ratings system sits at the heart of India’s broadcast advertising economy, shaping billions of rupees in annual ad spends. With trust in audience data once again under strain, advertisers, broadcasters and regulators are closely watching the outcome of the investigations.

Barc has urged industry stakeholders and media organisations to exercise restraint while the probe is underway, calling for an end to “unverified or speculatory claims” and reiterating its commitment to integrity and accountability.

Until the forensic audit and police findings are submitted and reviewed, the government said it would refrain from drawing conclusions.

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News Broadcasting

Rajat Sharma defamation row: Delhi court summons Congress leaders Ragini Nayak, Pawan Khera and Jairam Ramesh

Published

on

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has ordered the summoning of senior Congress leaders Ragini Nayak, Pawan Khera and Jairam Ramesh in a criminal case filed by veteran journalist Rajat Sharma, sharpening a legal battle over alleged defamation and doctored digital content.

The order was passed on Monday by Devanshi Janmeja, judicial magistrate first class at Saket Courts, after the court found prima facie grounds to proceed under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code, including forgery, creation of false electronic records and defamation.

Sharma, chairman and editor-in-chief of India TV, had approached the court over allegations made in June 2024 that he had used derogatory language against Congress spokesperson Ragini Nayak during a live television debate. He denied the charge, claiming it was fuelled by a manipulated video circulated online.

According to the complaint, a clipped version of the broadcast carrying superimposed captions, which were not part of the original programme, was first shared on social media platform X by Nayak and later amplified through retweets and public statements by Khera and Ramesh. Sharma said the viral spread caused serious reputational harm and personal distress.

The court took note of forensic science laboratory findings that pointed to visible post-production alterations in the video, including added titles and captions. It also cited witness testimonies from those present during the live broadcast, who stated that no abusive or objectionable language had been used.

Advertisement

In a related civil matter, the Delhi High Court had earlier observed a prima facie absence of abusive remarks and directed the removal of the disputed social media posts.

With criminal proceedings now set in motion, the case adds to mounting scrutiny around political messaging, digital manipulation and accountability on social media platforms.

Continue Reading

News Broadcasting

Mukesh Ambani, Larry Fink come together for CNBC-TV18 exclusive

Reliance and BlackRock chiefs map the future of investing as global capital eyes India

Published

on

MUMBAI: India’s capital story takes centre stage today as Mukesh Ambani and Larry Fink sit down for a rare joint television conversation, bringing together two of the most powerful voices in global business at a moment of economic churn and opportunity.

The Reliance Industries chief and the BlackRock boss will speak with Shereen Bhan, managing editor of CNBC-TV18, in an exclusive interaction airing from 3:00 pm on February 4. The timing is deliberate. Geopolitics are tense, technology is disruptive and capital is choosier. India, meanwhile, is pitching itself as a long-term bet.

The pairing is symbolic. Reliance straddles energy transition, digital infrastructure and consumer growth in the world’s fastest-expanding major economy. BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, oversees more than $14 tn in assets and sits at the nerve centre of global capital flows. When the two talk, markets tend to listen.

Fink’s appearance marks his third India visit, a signal of the country’s rising strategic weight for the Wall Street-listed firm, which carries a market value above $177 bn. His earlier 2023 trips included an October stop in New Delhi, where he met both Ambani and Narendra Modi.

India is now central to BlackRock’s expansion plans, notably through its joint venture with Jio Financial Services. Announced in July 2023, the 50:50 venture, JioBlackRock, commits up to $150 mn each from the partners to build a digital-first asset-management platform aimed at India’s swelling investor class.

Advertisement

The backdrop is robust. BlackRock ended 2025 with record assets under management of $14.04 tn, helped by $698 bn in net inflows, including $342 bn in the fourth quarter alone. Scale gives Fink both heft and a long lens on where money is moving.

He has been openly bullish on India. At the Saudi-US Investment Summit in Riyadh last year, Fink argued that the “fog of global uncertainty is lifting”, with capital returning to dynamic markets such as India, drawn by reforms, demographics and durable return potential.

Expect the conversation to range beyond balance sheets, into technology’s role in finance, access to capital and the mechanics of sustainable growth in a fracturing world order. For investors and policymakers alike, it is a snapshot of how big money is thinking about India.

At a time when capital is cautious and growth is contested, India wants to be the exception. When Ambani and Fink share a stage, it is less a chat and more a signal. The world’s money is still looking for its next big story, and India intends to be it.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement CNN News18
Advertisement whatsapp
Advertisement ALL 3 Media
Advertisement Year Enders

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Indian Television Dot Com PVT LTD