Connect with us

MAM

Ipsos Global Advisor releases survey on World Refugee Day

Published

on

Mumbai: 20 June is World Refugee Day. The Ipsos Global Advisor, 29 country study shows interesting global attitudes towards refugees. Interestingly there is a lot of empathy seen for those who are victims of war and persecution and at least 61 per cent of urban Indians polled and three in four global citizens (74 per cent) believe victims of war and persecution should be allowed to take refuge in any country, including their own; countries supporting this view most were New Zealand (87 per cent), Spain (85 per cent), Great Britain (84 per cent), Sweden (84 per cent) and Canada (84 per cent).   

Published data shows, over the last decade, the number of forcibly displaced people has more than doubled, and at the end of 2022 it stood at a record 108.4 million, up 19.1 million on a year earlier and representing the biggest ever increase, according to the UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees), a UN Refugee Agency. Numbers are continuing to rise, with UNHCR estimating the global total in May 2023 to be 110 million. The growing effects of the climate emergency, increased wars/ conflicts, cost of living crises and concerning global economic outlook exacerbate existing displacement crises.

The numbers below show the countries facing the maximum influx of refugees and how each country is responding to those displaced by war and persecution  and how welcoming they would be of them.

Attitude towards refugees

58 per cent of urban Indians polled believe most foreigners seeking refuge in India are not refugees but those wanting to get into India for economic reasons and to avail the welfare schemes. Though one in two urban Indians (53 per cent) believe refugees make a positive contribution to the country. Though almost six in ten Indians (57 per cent) hold the view that we need to close our borders to refugees entirely and cannot accept any at this time. The sentiment was seen to be most dominant among the citizens of Turkey (76 per cent), Malaysia (72 per cent) and Peru (64 per cent).

Advertisement

Policies on Refugees

Indians displayed divided views on refugees: 37 per cent said we should let the refugees stay and allow more; 31 per cent believe we should let the refugees currently in India stay and not allow anymore in the country; while 32 per cent believe the refugees should be reported and not allowed anymore. Interestingly, we had New Zealand (68 per cent), Spain (65 per cent) and Brazil (63 per cent) strongly in support of refugees staying and allowing more to take refuge. Citizens of Turkey (59 per cent) wanted the refugees deported, and more not allowed.

About legal passage into India, 27 per cent of urban Indians polled said there were enough legal routes into India for refugees, 29 per cent believed that we need to provide more legal routes, while 22 per cent felt there were no legal routes for refugees.

Why are countries compelled to take refugees? 34 per cent urban Indians believe it is a humanitarian obligation; 17 per cent feel it is legal obligation under international law (17 per cent); 11 per cent believe to boost the economy by bringing refugees with necessary skills, 9 per cent believe to promote diversity and multiculturalism and 11 per cent were undecided.

How are refugees treated? Good or bad?

Advertisement

At least one in two Indians (52 per cent) polled felt refugees were treated well in India, while 24 per cent felt refugees were not treated well in the country. 6 in 10 global citizens felt refugees were being treated well. And markets claiming to provide most fair treatment to refugees included Indonesia (89 per cent), Poland (80 per cent), Peru (74 per cent), Germany (74 per cent), Turkey (72 per cent), Thailand (70 per cent) and Canada (69 per cent). South Africa displayed polarized views with 48 per cent claiming fair treatment for refugees and 45 per cent claiming unfair treatment for refugees.

Views on Policy for Asylum Seekers

Almost four in ten urban Indians (39 per cent) said they would support a policy that restricts the movement of asylum seekers (for example in detention centres or border facilities), until their claim for asylum was processed and they were given permission to remain in the country, while 22 per cent opposed such a policy.  

39 per cent urban Indians said they would support a policy that sends applicants for asylum from their country to another host country, as a deterrent to others from attempting to enter their country. The policy was supported most by Turkey (53 per cent) and Malaysia (48 per cent) – nations that have been in the throes of great refugee influx.

Interestingly 6 in 10 urban Indians (61 per cent) polled were of the view that allowing asylum seekers to work would help them learn about language and integrate. The view was most profound among the citizens of Sweden (80 per cent) and Mexico (73 per cent). While almost 6 in 10 Indians (59 per cent) were also of the view that giving asylum seekers the right to work could attract people to the country without genuine asylum claims.

Advertisement

More number of Indians believe refugees have had a more positive impact than a negative impact in different

Turkey was seen to have contrary and strong views to all and according to their citizens refugees have negatively impacted most areas, worsening them, as shown above.

Actions taken to support refugees

Urban Indians claim to have taken a host of actions in the past 12 months to support refugees.

17 per cent Indians claim to have donated funds/ goods to support the refugee cause; 17 per cent claimed to have volunteered to help refugees; 16 per cent have posted social media messages in support of refugees; 15 per cent say they have contacted govt officials or signed petitions advocating for refugees and 15 per cent have offered refugees a place to stay in their home. 55 per cent claimed to have taken no action in the past 12 months in support of refugees.   

Advertisement

Summarising on the findings of the survey, Ipsos India CEO Amit Adarkar said, “The recent influx of refugees has been of Indians in other countries who have been victims of war and persecution and so the govt policies have been quite friendly towards them. Though in the past, most of the refugees entering into India were from the border countries looking for better economic prospects. And the actions were different to control the influx, as they were perceived to be a strain on the limited resources. India does not work within the confines of the UNHCR but is home to lacs of refugees and has been providing them shelter. The survey  shows even at the individual level Indians have been supporting the cause of refugees.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Brands

Netflix India names Rekha Rane director of films and series marketing

Streaming giant bets on a seasoned marketer who helped build Amazon and Netflix into household names

Published

on

MUMBAI: Netflix has put a proven brand builder at the helm of its films and series marketing in India, naming Rekha Rane as director in a move that signals sharper focus on audience growth and cultural cut-through in one of its most hotly contested markets.

Rane steps into the role after seven years at Netflix, where she has quietly shaped how the platform sells stories to India. Her latest promotion, effective February 2026, crowns a run that spans brand, slate and product marketing across originals, licensed content and new verticals such as games.

A strategic marketing and communications professional with roughly 15 years’ experience, Rane has spent much of her career building technology-led consumer businesses and new categories, notably e-commerce and subscription video on demand. She was part of the early push that introduced Amazon.in, Prime Video and Netflix to Indian homes, then helped turn them into everyday brands.

At Netflix, she most recently served as head of brand and slate marketing for India from March 2024 to February 2026, leading teams across media and marketing for global and local content portfolios. Before that, as manager for original films and series marketing, she led IP creation and go-to-market strategy for titles including Guns and Gulaabs, Kaala Paani, The Railway Men* and The Great Indian Kapil Show, spanning both binge and weekly-release formats.

Her earlier Netflix roles covered product discovery and promotion in India and integrated campaign strategy to drive conversations around the content slate, product awareness and brand-equity metrics.

Advertisement

Before Netflix, Rane logged more than three years at Amazon in brand marketing roles in Bengaluru. There she handled national and regional campaigns for Amazon.in, worked on customer assistance programmes in growth geographies and contributed to the go-to-market strategy for the launch of Prime Video India.

Her career began well away from streaming. At Reliance Brands in Mumbai, she worked on retail marketing for Diesel and Superdry. A stint at Leo Burnett saw her work on primary research for P&G Tide, mapping Indian shoppers’ paths to purchase. Earlier still, at Orange in the United Kingdom, she rose from sales assistant to store manager, running a team and owning monthly P&L for a retail outlet.

The arc is telling. As global streamers fight for attention in a crowded Indian market, executives who understand both mass retail behaviour and digital habit-building are prized. Rane’s career sits at that intersection.

For Netflix, the bet is simple: in a market spoilt for choice, sharp marketing can still tilt the screen. And with Rane now leading the charge, the streamer is signalling it wants not just viewers, but fandom.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Brands

Orient Beverages pops the fizz with steady Q3 gains and rising profits

Kolkata-based beverage maker reports stronger revenues and profits for December quarter.

Published

on

MUMBAI: A fizzy quarter with a steady aftertaste that’s how Orient Beverages Limited, the company that manufactures and distributes packaged drinking water under the brand name Bisleri closed the December 2025 period, as the Kolkata-based drinks maker reported improved revenues and a healthy rise in profits, signalling operational stability in a competitive beverage market.

For the quarter ended December 31, 2025, Orient Beverages posted standalone revenue from operations of Rs 39.98 crore, up from Rs 36.42 crore in the previous quarter and Rs 33.53 crore in the same quarter last year. Total income for the quarter stood at Rs 42.24 crore, reflecting consistent demand and stable pricing across its beverage portfolio.

Profit before tax for the quarter came in at Rs 3.47 crore, a sharp improvement from Rs 1.31 crore in the September quarter and Rs 0.39 crore a year ago. After accounting for tax expenses of Rs 0.79 crore, the company reported a net profit of Rs 2.68 crore, nearly three times the Rs 0.99 crore recorded in the preceding quarter.

On a nine-month basis, the momentum remained intact. Revenue from operations for the period ended December 31, 2025 rose to Rs 117.66 crore, compared with Rs 106.95 crore in the corresponding period last year. Net profit for the nine months climbed to Rs 5.51 crore, more than double the Rs 2.18 crore reported in the same period of the previous financial year.

The consolidated numbers told a similar story. For the December quarter, consolidated revenue from operations stood at Rs 45.06 crore, while profit after tax came in at Rs 2.06 crore. For the nine-month period, consolidated revenue touched Rs 133.57 crore, with net profit of Rs 4.49 crore, underscoring the group’s improving profitability trajectory.

Advertisement

Operating expenses remained largely controlled, with cost of materials, employee benefits and other expenses broadly aligned with revenue growth. The company continued to operate within a single reportable segment beverages simplifying its cost structure and reporting framework.

The unaudited financial results were reviewed by the Audit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting held on 7 February 2026. Statutory auditors carried out a limited review and reported no material misstatements in the results.

In a market where margins are often squeezed by input costs and competition, Orient Beverages’ latest numbers suggest the company has found a reliable rhythm not explosive, but steady enough to keep the fizz alive.

Continue Reading

MAM

Washington Post CEO exits abruptly after newsroom cuts spark backlash

Leadership change follows layoffs, protests and a bruising battle over trust.

Published

on

MUMBAI: When the presses are rolling but patience runs out, even the editor’s chair isn’t safe. The Washington Post announced on Saturday that its chief executive and publisher Will Lewis is stepping down with immediate effect, bringing a sudden end to a turbulent two-year tenure marked by financial strain, newsroom unrest and public backlash.

Lewis’s exit comes just days after the Bezos-owned newspaper announced sweeping job cuts that triggered protests outside its Washington headquarters and a wave of anger from readers and staff. While newspapers across the US are grappling with shrinking revenues and digital disruption, Lewis’s leadership had increasingly come under fire for how those pressures were handled.

The Post confirmed that Jeff D’Onofrio, a former Tumblr CEO who joined the organisation last year as chief financial officer, has taken over as CEO and publisher, effective immediately. In an email to staff, later shared by reporters on social media, Lewis said it was “the right time for me to step aside.”

The leadership change follows the announcement of large-scale redundancies earlier this week. While the Post did not officially confirm numbers, The New York Times reported that around 300 of the paper’s roughly 800 journalists were laid off. Entire teams were dismantled, including the Post’s Middle East bureau and its Kyiv-based correspondent covering the war in Ukraine.

Sports, graphics and local reporting were sharply reduced, and the paper’s daily podcast, Post Reports, was suspended. On Thursday, hundreds of journalists and supporters gathered outside the Post’s downtown office in protest, calling the cuts a blow to public-interest journalism.

Advertisement

Former executive editor Marty Baron described the moment as “among the darkest days in the history of one of the world’s greatest news organisations.”

Lewis defended his record in his farewell note, saying “difficult decisions” were taken to secure the paper’s long-term future and protect its ability to publish “high-quality nonpartisan news”. But his tenure coincided with growing scrutiny of editorial independence at the Post.

Owner Jeff Bezos faced criticism for reining in the paper’s traditionally liberal editorial page and blocking an endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris ahead of the 2024 US election. The move was widely seen as breaking the long-standing firewall between ownership and editorial decision-making.

According to a Wall Street Journal report, around 250,000 digital subscribers cancelled their subscriptions after the paper declined to endorse Harris. The Post reportedly lost about $100 million in 2024 as advertising and subscription revenues slid.

While the wider newspaper industry continues to battle declining print advertising and the pull of social media, some national titles have stabilised. Rivals such as The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times have managed to build sustainable digital businesses, a turnaround that has so far eluded the Post despite its billionaire backing.

Advertisement

As Jeff D’Onofrio steps into the role, the challenge is stark, restore confidence inside the newsroom, win back readers who walked away, and prove that one of America’s most storied newspapers can still find its footing in a brutally competitive media landscape.

Continue Reading
Advertisement CNN News18
Advertisement whatsapp
Advertisement ALL 3 Media
Advertisement Year Enders

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Indian Television Dot Com PVT LTD

This will close in 10 seconds

×