Category: Ficci Frames

  • ‘Make an Indian’ through the right type of kids content

    ‘Make an Indian’ through the right type of kids content

    MUMBAI: In a country where one third of the population is composed of children, very little has been done to encourage and promote kids content. While most will argue and point to the vibrant plethora of content for kids that kids’ networks in India boast of, it is just a fraction of what is required and can be achieved. To discuss the issues that held the industry back from catering quality kids content,  industry stalwarts like filmmaker Subhash Ghai, CFSI chairman Mukesh Khanna, GEAR Education founder Shrinivasan, Green Gold founder and CEO Rajiv Chilaka, Bioscopewala Pictures president Nishith Takia and Viacom 18 Kids cluster head Nina Jaipuria were a part of a panel. Moderated by FICCI animation chairman and Screenyug Creations founder Ashish SK, the panel addressed the need to have a Kids Content Act.

    The panellists unanimously agreed that India lacks any guidelines on what kind of content kids should consume, which exposed them to content that isn’t meant of them. Today’s kids are tomorrow’s future, and hence what content today’s kids consumed would have a character building influence on the adult of tomorrow, was the argument that Ghai had in support of the Act.

    “The formative years till the age of 8 years are crucial for a child. That is why pre-school content for kids has great power to familiarise them with our culture and add morals and values to their lives,” Shrinivasan stressed. “India lacks any form of parenting education. Parents often mistake the TV to be their babysitter, and expect their children to learn life values from it. Therefore we must pay attention to what kids are consuming on television.”

    A large part of the panel discussion was dominated by the need to have more Indian content for kids that reflected Indian culture and connected today’s kids with the roots of their parents. Both Ghai and Khanna felt that this generation of kids were so taken by the second screen – be it the mobile phone or the tablet — they were slowly drifting away from their own culture and embracing the west. They pointed at westernised kids’ content available right now and the lack of proper home grown content that adhered to the values of the land. Chalika also pointed out that he grew up amidst Archie comics and American and British superheroes and characters.

    Jaipuria however begged to differ with her fellow panellists. Pointing out to the progress of her own network, Jaipuria shared that 65 per cent of what Nickelodeon showrd was originally home grown, and the rest was either dubbed or tweaked to make it relatable for the local kids. Bringing in a fresh perspective to the digital era, she shared that soon all players would be in an even field thanks to digitisation. This would lead to such a huge demand for kids content that she doubted the country could meet at the moment with any measure of sustainability. Her reason for supporting an act was to ensure that the industry and all its sections — the creators and the distributors– were prepared with a ready supply of quality kids content for the near future.

    To make that a reality, there were certain legal, financial, and logistical hold ups, the moderator pointed out. Takia, who has been closely involved with the making of the recent National Award winning children’s film Delhi Safari, painted a sad picture of the current motion pictures sector for kids’ films. “Our film did extremely well in China and South Korea, but failed miserably in India. The movie was pulled out of screens way too quickly. Most of the money we made was from foreign market. This shows how we need to create an environment where children’s films reach their due audiences. The act may consider screen reservation or other ways to ensure viewership of such films,” he said. Government sanctions, subsidies, and entertainment tax reliefs were also brought up while discussing the act.

    “The ease of producing a children’s film is the key to take this industry in the right direction. Outside India, most animated children’s films are co-produced but Indian film makers can’t do that. We are restricted by law,” said Khanna. “The act should deal with this and allow filmmakers to co-produce the films and share the financial burden of creating something which requires a huge budget.”

    To address the visibility issue, Ashish proposed a free to air DD Kids channel so that kids living in the most remote parts of the country could enjoy quality content.

    The one take away from the discussion was perhaps the phrase ‘make an Indian.’ Giving a clever twist to the extremely popular ‘Make In India’ phrase that prime minister Modi had devised , the panellists urged that content creators should ‘make an Indian’ out of the tiny tots, riding on powerful home grown kids content that reflected the country’s culture.

    With so much stress on raising the country’s kids to the right type of ‘Indian’, is there a risk of homogenising kids content and regulating creativity? — A question the panel raised but did not answer.

  • FICCI FRAMES 2016: Updates: Lord of the Ratings- The BARC order

    FICCI FRAMES 2016: Updates: Lord of the Ratings- The BARC order

    Stay tuned: Indiantelevision.com brings live realtime updates from FICCI Frames; power-packed session Lord of the Ratings- The BARC Order.
     
    The session features industry leaders from the Broadcasting and Advertising sectors who will share their experience of using the new ratings system, and also debate ways to make more intelligent reading of this vast data. 
     
    Moderator: Paritosh Joshi, CEO, India TV
    Panelists: Partho Dasgupta, CEO, BARC
    Raj Nayak, CEO, Colors
    Shashi Sinha, CEO, IPG Mediabrands
    Hitesh Chawla
     

     
    Paritosh gets the session up and rolling. 
     
     
    Nowhere in the world an effort like BARC has been put off Shashi Sinha makes the initital remarks..
     
    Paritosh shoots a question on volatilty…… In response to Paritosh’s questions of BARC data being volatile, Partho says, “Things are rapidly changing and in this scenario, things are meant to be volatile.”
     
    Raj as always with smiles on his face yes and no to Partho’s answer, “The volatility comes not from GECs but mostly from the niche channels.”  
     

    Discussion heats up, Paritosh asks Partho if he acknowledges the fact that the data is erroneous: he says in reply: “Relative errors are a part of statistics and this is sampling which has cost implications.”

     

    Raj cuts in: “We are measuring content not viewership. There is no dichotomy. You may not mix and match every platform but the measurement is there.”

    Raj bats for Partho, jokes and says, “Partho’s position is the most amiable one. He is like the Election Commissioner of India.”

    Paritosh now throws one more googly towards Partho and he being a batsman with supreme temperament bats it with cool, calm and content. What happens when tempering is attempted?

    You can monetise what you can measure Paritosh’s question on the relationship between measurement and monetisation spurs up a new debate. Seperate rural and urban monetisation, “Digital can be monetised, we launched VOOT two days back. We are content creator and we will bundle ourselves and rake as much as possible. I am even of the opinion that rural and urban should be sold separately why should we have same selling if there are different measurement available” says Raj.

     

    Shashi Sinha has the mike: “Our game plan is to get all guys aligned and for user everything will be integrated.”

    Hitesh shares his experience and mentions that the “economics does make a sense” in his line of business, which is solely data oriented.

    “Around the world, in terms of scale, we have the larger sample in the world. We also have the least advertising revenue”, Partho.

    Shashi cuts in, ”Don’t walk into the trap. Technology has been an issue. Globally technology is cheaper. We have to ramp up. The idea is to enter the home and capture data.”

    Finally the wait is over Shashi Sinha goes to the remark made by the Minister of Telecom Ravi Shankar Prasad. Just to remind readers the Minister said “India needs a better rating system.” Shashi’ finds the statement ‘intriguing’ “They are not happy with data. Government was involved in the process from the very begining. Hence we were a little intrigued with the comments made.” 

     

    After seperate rural-urban selling proposition Raj now hits another nail with a valid point, “BARC’s work is to roll out data, now to say which channel is number one or two. I strongly feel FTA channels and pay channels should be rated seperately.” 

     

    Such exquisite measurement body but is it really helping you monetise better Raj asks Paritosh, “Measurement system for that, broadcasters need to be blamed for this. But I think as media evolves the ad revenue will also increase. For  me what is the most important avenue for revenue and that is separate rural and urban separate monetisation,” “though Shashi may not happy with that but that’s what I feel” replies Raj

    Paritosh thanks the packed house, round of applause and the sessions marks its conclusion.

    Thanks a lot stay tuned for more live updates.

    Let us know your feedback with a tweet @ITVNewz  

    “What we do is we see the data in the backend, first we check if there is a content reason for the change in behaviour, but if content is not the reason we with our three vigilance to check the ground issues and once we get a clear scenario get the hard evidence we quarantine the houses.”

     

  • FICCI FRAMES 2016: Updates: Lord of the Ratings- The BARC order

    FICCI FRAMES 2016: Updates: Lord of the Ratings- The BARC order

    Stay tuned: Indiantelevision.com brings live realtime updates from FICCI Frames; power-packed session Lord of the Ratings- The BARC Order.
     
    The session features industry leaders from the Broadcasting and Advertising sectors who will share their experience of using the new ratings system, and also debate ways to make more intelligent reading of this vast data. 
     
    Moderator: Paritosh Joshi, CEO, India TV
    Panelists: Partho Dasgupta, CEO, BARC
    Raj Nayak, CEO, Colors
    Shashi Sinha, CEO, IPG Mediabrands
    Hitesh Chawla
     

     
    Paritosh gets the session up and rolling. 
     
     
    Nowhere in the world an effort like BARC has been put off Shashi Sinha makes the initital remarks..
     
    Paritosh shoots a question on volatilty…… In response to Paritosh’s questions of BARC data being volatile, Partho says, “Things are rapidly changing and in this scenario, things are meant to be volatile.”
     
    Raj as always with smiles on his face yes and no to Partho’s answer, “The volatility comes not from GECs but mostly from the niche channels.”  
     

    Discussion heats up, Paritosh asks Partho if he acknowledges the fact that the data is erroneous: he says in reply: “Relative errors are a part of statistics and this is sampling which has cost implications.”

     

    Raj cuts in: “We are measuring content not viewership. There is no dichotomy. You may not mix and match every platform but the measurement is there.”

    Raj bats for Partho, jokes and says, “Partho’s position is the most amiable one. He is like the Election Commissioner of India.”

    Paritosh now throws one more googly towards Partho and he being a batsman with supreme temperament bats it with cool, calm and content. What happens when tempering is attempted?

    You can monetise what you can measure Paritosh’s question on the relationship between measurement and monetisation spurs up a new debate. Seperate rural and urban monetisation, “Digital can be monetised, we launched VOOT two days back. We are content creator and we will bundle ourselves and rake as much as possible. I am even of the opinion that rural and urban should be sold separately why should we have same selling if there are different measurement available” says Raj.

     

    Shashi Sinha has the mike: “Our game plan is to get all guys aligned and for user everything will be integrated.”

    Hitesh shares his experience and mentions that the “economics does make a sense” in his line of business, which is solely data oriented.

    “Around the world, in terms of scale, we have the larger sample in the world. We also have the least advertising revenue”, Partho.

    Shashi cuts in, ”Don’t walk into the trap. Technology has been an issue. Globally technology is cheaper. We have to ramp up. The idea is to enter the home and capture data.”

    Finally the wait is over Shashi Sinha goes to the remark made by the Minister of Telecom Ravi Shankar Prasad. Just to remind readers the Minister said “India needs a better rating system.” Shashi’ finds the statement ‘intriguing’ “They are not happy with data. Government was involved in the process from the very begining. Hence we were a little intrigued with the comments made.” 

     

    After seperate rural-urban selling proposition Raj now hits another nail with a valid point, “BARC’s work is to roll out data, now to say which channel is number one or two. I strongly feel FTA channels and pay channels should be rated seperately.” 

     

    Such exquisite measurement body but is it really helping you monetise better Raj asks Paritosh, “Measurement system for that, broadcasters need to be blamed for this. But I think as media evolves the ad revenue will also increase. For  me what is the most important avenue for revenue and that is separate rural and urban separate monetisation,” “though Shashi may not happy with that but that’s what I feel” replies Raj

    Paritosh thanks the packed house, round of applause and the sessions marks its conclusion.

    Thanks a lot stay tuned for more live updates.

    Let us know your feedback with a tweet @ITVNewz  

    “What we do is we see the data in the backend, first we check if there is a content reason for the change in behaviour, but if content is not the reason we with our three vigilance to check the ground issues and once we get a clear scenario get the hard evidence we quarantine the houses.”

     

  • Kids content growth is fastest in digital, and monetizing models need to keep up

    Kids content growth is fastest in digital, and monetizing models need to keep up

    MUMBAI: ‘Kids content has already gone digital, catering to its target audience,’ was the unanimous consensus at a session on ‘Kids Go Digital’ at the ongoing FICCI Frames 2016

    Unlike most discussions on digital media, there were no “if’s, ‘but’s and ‘maybe’s” and panelists — Chuchu TV CEO Vinoth Chander, Godimensions’ founders Shravan and Sanjay Kumaran, Nazara Technologies CEO Manish Agarwal  and Viacom 18 Digital Ventures COO Gaurav Gandhi – discussed how to take digital kids content to the next level, expand its market in India and make the most of the resources and eyeballs at disposal. Whizkidz Media founder Amit Agarwal, moderated the panel discussion.

    “Kids content growth is fastest in digital as its consumers are native to the medium. While you and I are adapting to the medium, they are born in the digital world and hence take naturally to it,” said Gandhi, adding that over the years the demography of kids born in the digital world will only grow.

    Currently kids’ content on digital platform is mostly on YouTube which has a few issues. Firstly, there is hardly any premium kids content available in India, then there is a lack of character driven shows, and most of the content for children is targeted at preschoolers leaving out a huge chunk of the audience. Moreover, most of the viewership comes from foreign markets, and the market in India still needs to be developed.

    Reflecting on how one markets kids content, Gandhi had a cryptic answer: “In their own language”. “You need to think like them and market your content on their own terms.”

    Speaking from personal experience, Gandhi added that using TV as a medium is a good start, as a huge chunk of the audience is still on TV. “Sampling videos on YouTube, TV and even reaching out to them through schools and play schools is also a good way to understand them and share your content.”

    As far as Chander was concerned, organic reach has worked wonders for him and his company ChuChu TV and he would vouch for strategically placed promotion within their own YouTube content. “We want to concentrate on quality content, rather than marketing as the former does the latter for us,” Chander said categorically. He also stressed that kids usually take more to visual content, and therefore propagating the message through videos and pictures would work better.

    “Kids are smart,” said Agarwal on the topic of edutainment. “Do not trick them into consuming content that you sell as entertainment, which is actually educational and is meant for learning. You need to separate your own consumers from their parents.” To back his argument Agarwal narrated about his own failed experiment with a gaming app that was intended to teach mathematics to kids. “A minute into the game they figured that this was no game but a trick to teach them, and immediately they got disinterested. For them games is entertainment, and just that.”

    The young entrepreneurs in the panel however differed. The Kumaran brothers said “Kids do like content that mirrors the teachings of their parents. Moreover, content that has an educational value that teaches a skill set like a programming code, or their everyday school syllabus with diagrams and videos, will work immensely well.”
     
    Expectedly monetizing models came up when discussing content production and business opportunity. “Time spent on content is what advertisers swear by. If that is so, as per market insight, kids will spend more and more time on digital or second screens than on TV, it is already happening,” said Agarwal hinting that ad revenue on kids content on digital platform will only grow.
     
    Gandhi shared another statistic from a BCG study: “Out of top 200 YouTube channels that garnered 10 billion views, 5 percent had kids content while 26 percent of the viewership came from children. It indicates that kids watch repeatedly, and they get obsessive over characters,” Gandhi said. Pointing out the simple demand supply ratio in economics, he added, “money will follow.”

  • Kids content growth is fastest in digital, and monetizing models need to keep up

    Kids content growth is fastest in digital, and monetizing models need to keep up

    MUMBAI: ‘Kids content has already gone digital, catering to its target audience,’ was the unanimous consensus at a session on ‘Kids Go Digital’ at the ongoing FICCI Frames 2016

    Unlike most discussions on digital media, there were no “if’s, ‘but’s and ‘maybe’s” and panelists — Chuchu TV CEO Vinoth Chander, Godimensions’ founders Shravan and Sanjay Kumaran, Nazara Technologies CEO Manish Agarwal  and Viacom 18 Digital Ventures COO Gaurav Gandhi – discussed how to take digital kids content to the next level, expand its market in India and make the most of the resources and eyeballs at disposal. Whizkidz Media founder Amit Agarwal, moderated the panel discussion.

    “Kids content growth is fastest in digital as its consumers are native to the medium. While you and I are adapting to the medium, they are born in the digital world and hence take naturally to it,” said Gandhi, adding that over the years the demography of kids born in the digital world will only grow.

    Currently kids’ content on digital platform is mostly on YouTube which has a few issues. Firstly, there is hardly any premium kids content available in India, then there is a lack of character driven shows, and most of the content for children is targeted at preschoolers leaving out a huge chunk of the audience. Moreover, most of the viewership comes from foreign markets, and the market in India still needs to be developed.

    Reflecting on how one markets kids content, Gandhi had a cryptic answer: “In their own language”. “You need to think like them and market your content on their own terms.”

    Speaking from personal experience, Gandhi added that using TV as a medium is a good start, as a huge chunk of the audience is still on TV. “Sampling videos on YouTube, TV and even reaching out to them through schools and play schools is also a good way to understand them and share your content.”

    As far as Chander was concerned, organic reach has worked wonders for him and his company ChuChu TV and he would vouch for strategically placed promotion within their own YouTube content. “We want to concentrate on quality content, rather than marketing as the former does the latter for us,” Chander said categorically. He also stressed that kids usually take more to visual content, and therefore propagating the message through videos and pictures would work better.

    “Kids are smart,” said Agarwal on the topic of edutainment. “Do not trick them into consuming content that you sell as entertainment, which is actually educational and is meant for learning. You need to separate your own consumers from their parents.” To back his argument Agarwal narrated about his own failed experiment with a gaming app that was intended to teach mathematics to kids. “A minute into the game they figured that this was no game but a trick to teach them, and immediately they got disinterested. For them games is entertainment, and just that.”

    The young entrepreneurs in the panel however differed. The Kumaran brothers said “Kids do like content that mirrors the teachings of their parents. Moreover, content that has an educational value that teaches a skill set like a programming code, or their everyday school syllabus with diagrams and videos, will work immensely well.”
     
    Expectedly monetizing models came up when discussing content production and business opportunity. “Time spent on content is what advertisers swear by. If that is so, as per market insight, kids will spend more and more time on digital or second screens than on TV, it is already happening,” said Agarwal hinting that ad revenue on kids content on digital platform will only grow.
     
    Gandhi shared another statistic from a BCG study: “Out of top 200 YouTube channels that garnered 10 billion views, 5 percent had kids content while 26 percent of the viewership came from children. It indicates that kids watch repeatedly, and they get obsessive over characters,” Gandhi said. Pointing out the simple demand supply ratio in economics, he added, “money will follow.”

  • Strong regulatory ecosystem vital for safeguarding IPR if M and E industry has to grow in the international market

    Strong regulatory ecosystem vital for safeguarding IPR if M and E industry has to grow in the international market

    MUMBAI: The subject of intellectual property rights and piracy keep coming up at the FICCI FRAMES year after year and appeals are made by creative artistes for stringent measures to check this.

    With digitization and if India is to become a media and entertainment hub, this gains urgency and is even more imperative that steps are taken for a strong legal and regulatory ecosystem safeguarding intellectual properties.

    Saving intellectual Property in a world without boundaries saw panelists and legal experts referring to global practices and emphasizing on the importance of IPR for the growth of the Indian media and entertainment sector.

    In fact, World Intellectual Property Organization Director General Francis Gurry stressed the need for stringent laws in an upcoming market like India where creativity was growing at such a speed. He also referred to how WIPO was helping member countries to deal with these problems.

    The session was moderated by Saikrishna & Associates partner Ameet Dutta. The panelists were Motion Picture Association of America Asia Pacific VP regional legal counsel Michael Schlesinger, Star India senior VP legal and regulatory Pulak Bagchi and Zee Network president legal and regulatory affairs Avnindra Mohan.

    Dutta said the focus of the context in digital India has shifted from copyrights to user rights. This underlines the challenges that intellectual property faces. The question that he posed before the panelists was where India stood on the world map in terms of economics.

    Schlesinger said: “India is a mine of creativity. This is evident with the number of features films, television channels or other platforms available in India. Our existence will depend on a surge of creativity and invention. India is maximizing its potential but has to find a place on the global map. For example, India showed total box office collection of $2.5 million in 2015 while China had $6.5 million and US had $11.1 million. These figures clearly show that just making products or content in India will not help until India can acquire international content as well. India has to maximize a lot of things like job creations, movie screenings etc.”

    Mohan shared the scenario about the regulatory environment in India. “For the broadcasting sector, there is no copyright at all since 2003. It is always user rights. In India, the content producers and broadcasters are same to the extent of 90 per cent unlike US. If a distributor comes to you, you have to provide content on non-discriminatory basis with equal prices irrespective of the size. This is the only sector where a broadcaster is asked to provide its content with prices frozen in 2003. I am forced to give my content to the distributors at a frozen price.”

    Bagchi generally agreed with Mohan and said with the challenges faced by the entire sector, the impact of regulatory laws on channels and the challenges faced by broadcasters cannot be neglected. “Consumers are our kings. I agree with Mohan about the prices being frozen since 2003. Imagine what would happen if the Indian government asks Bill Gates to sell all the Microsoft versions and its tools today on the prices that were relevant in 2003,” said Bagchi. He stressed that this was one reason why international parties hesitate on investing in Indian IPs, and the archaic guidelines and regulations prevent the growth of intellectual property.

    For a session that was aimed at how one can survive the digital divide, it ended with the panelists agreeing on the importance of having sectoral regulations in sync with the copyright laws. This will also retain the India IPR regime with the best practices in the field of intellectual property rights.

  • Strong regulatory ecosystem vital for safeguarding IPR if M and E industry has to grow in the international market

    Strong regulatory ecosystem vital for safeguarding IPR if M and E industry has to grow in the international market

    MUMBAI: The subject of intellectual property rights and piracy keep coming up at the FICCI FRAMES year after year and appeals are made by creative artistes for stringent measures to check this.

    With digitization and if India is to become a media and entertainment hub, this gains urgency and is even more imperative that steps are taken for a strong legal and regulatory ecosystem safeguarding intellectual properties.

    Saving intellectual Property in a world without boundaries saw panelists and legal experts referring to global practices and emphasizing on the importance of IPR for the growth of the Indian media and entertainment sector.

    In fact, World Intellectual Property Organization Director General Francis Gurry stressed the need for stringent laws in an upcoming market like India where creativity was growing at such a speed. He also referred to how WIPO was helping member countries to deal with these problems.

    The session was moderated by Saikrishna & Associates partner Ameet Dutta. The panelists were Motion Picture Association of America Asia Pacific VP regional legal counsel Michael Schlesinger, Star India senior VP legal and regulatory Pulak Bagchi and Zee Network president legal and regulatory affairs Avnindra Mohan.

    Dutta said the focus of the context in digital India has shifted from copyrights to user rights. This underlines the challenges that intellectual property faces. The question that he posed before the panelists was where India stood on the world map in terms of economics.

    Schlesinger said: “India is a mine of creativity. This is evident with the number of features films, television channels or other platforms available in India. Our existence will depend on a surge of creativity and invention. India is maximizing its potential but has to find a place on the global map. For example, India showed total box office collection of $2.5 million in 2015 while China had $6.5 million and US had $11.1 million. These figures clearly show that just making products or content in India will not help until India can acquire international content as well. India has to maximize a lot of things like job creations, movie screenings etc.”

    Mohan shared the scenario about the regulatory environment in India. “For the broadcasting sector, there is no copyright at all since 2003. It is always user rights. In India, the content producers and broadcasters are same to the extent of 90 per cent unlike US. If a distributor comes to you, you have to provide content on non-discriminatory basis with equal prices irrespective of the size. This is the only sector where a broadcaster is asked to provide its content with prices frozen in 2003. I am forced to give my content to the distributors at a frozen price.”

    Bagchi generally agreed with Mohan and said with the challenges faced by the entire sector, the impact of regulatory laws on channels and the challenges faced by broadcasters cannot be neglected. “Consumers are our kings. I agree with Mohan about the prices being frozen since 2003. Imagine what would happen if the Indian government asks Bill Gates to sell all the Microsoft versions and its tools today on the prices that were relevant in 2003,” said Bagchi. He stressed that this was one reason why international parties hesitate on investing in Indian IPs, and the archaic guidelines and regulations prevent the growth of intellectual property.

    For a session that was aimed at how one can survive the digital divide, it ended with the panelists agreeing on the importance of having sectoral regulations in sync with the copyright laws. This will also retain the India IPR regime with the best practices in the field of intellectual property rights.