Category: Special Report

  • Madison Media Group CEO Punitha Arumugam.

    Madison Media Group CEO Punitha Arumugam.

    Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.

    It is a brave and determined person who decides to move out of his or her comfort zone into a job having a profile alien to him or her. And in the competitive world of media and advertising it requires steely courage. But there are many who do so and the net benefit for them: a more rounded view of the industry.

    Take, for example, Punitha Arumugam, the CEO of the Sam Balsara- founded Madison Group, arguably one of the three most powerful media agencies in the country. Punitha – as everyone calls her – has switched from being a media planner to managing the business of media and advertising, and so far, she has enjoyed the journey, smooth or bumpy, to the hilt.

    In 1990, she joined O&M (Chennai) as a trainee, moved to Lintas’ Initiative Media soon after as media manager and moved out as media director. Then she joined Madison as Media Services director (West) in 2000, and in a six year span, has risen from COO (West) to CEO (West) and is currently Group CEO for all India.

    Early Years in Media
    Born, raised and educated in Chennai, Punitha’s father was in business and her mother is a housewife. She completed her graduation in BSC (Physics) and went on to study management from Madras University. Punitha started work in media right from the start and adapted to it like a fish to water. While doing her MBA, she was assigned a summer project with Chennai- based ad agency RK Swamy and it was there that her tryst with advertising began. She hopped on to O&M on completing her education and stayed on there for a full five years soaking up all she could in her media planning job, even though her heart was in servicing.

    “I realized that I liked advertising – primarily its servicing aspect. But, back then, the opportunities were rare for servicing and I joined the agency hoping to get a backdoor entry into servicing,” says Punitha.

    The protective environment at O&M gave her ample scope to learn the fundamentals of media. Says she, “O&M groomed me”.

    She recalls working on some small accounts. The head of O&M Chennai R. Lakshminarayan taught her one important lesson. “I learnt from him how simplicity works and arrogance does not, however brilliant you may be at your job.”

    But, after four-five years, the sense of security at O&M was a little stifling. “One just felt protected from harsh realities.”

    A call from the head of Lintas Chennai, came through, dangling an opportunity to get rid of the ennui that was creeping in. She grabbed it with both hands. In those days Lintas was the agency of choice for many; the experience of working in a larger role with a larger agency was something very few could say no to. With the proliferation of media outlets and increasing spread of satellite television, the media planner/buyer was coming even more centrestage in advertising as compared to earlier. And Lintas’ was at the cutting edge of media. Agencies had started setting up specialist media units to service growing client budgets effectively. The disintermediation of media was just about beginning.

    “I was raring to test new waters, so moved to Lintas as media manager,” she recollects.

    The water proved testing indeed as the culture in Lintas was very different from the one she had been used to. There was a lot of new learning, and some unlearning too. “I was thrown into the waters and had to learn to swim. I learnt how to service a client at Lintas,” she says.

    By nature, Punitha is unafraid to push the boundaries. She has all the qualities needed to be a successful media planner: strategic understanding, ability to grasp industry knowledge and expertise across all media. Additionally, over the years she has developed a comprehensive understanding of marketing communications which can be effectively translated into developing media goals, objectives and strategies.

    Punitha moved to Bangalore from Chennai solely because the latter had limited clients, whereas Bangalore offered much more in terms of learning experience and growth. She started in Lintas’ Initiative Media handling the Britannia account; five years later when she moved out she was heading the Bangalore office.

    It was the first time that she was handling sizable accounts. And she climbed steeply up the learning curve. She explains: “Britannia was a favourite client. I learnt a lot from Sunil Alagh, Vikram Kaushik, Atul Sinha and many others there.”

    She recalls an incident. “The team had prepared a huge presentation to convince Alagh not to associate with a program titled “Britannia All The Best” as it was not working. But, even before he saw the presentation, he asked us, ‘Give me an option if we aren’t using this.’ And, I had no answer. We had been so busy trying to convince him to disassociate, that, we realised that there is no point in highlighting a problem without having a solution in hand.”

    She adds: “I came into my own handling the Britannia account. I got great work done in terms of strategy and media innovations. And, after that it was sheer word of mouth from people who worked with me, my clients and the media sellers who made me known in the industry.”

    She decided to quit when Lynn DeSouza moved out of Initiative Media. She explains: “I look upon her as my godmother. I idolize and worship her and I felt unsettled when she left.”

    Plus, Punitha felt she had nothing more to offer or do in Bangalore, so the move to Mumbai was inevitable.

    “In Mumbai, I joined Carat for a month and then had a call from Sam Balsara and moved to Madison.” Her enthusiasm for the medium made her the “perfect” choice when Balsara needed someone as Media Services director (West) and Arumugam joined Madison in 2000.

    She elaborates: “Generally, the skills needed are quite different. Media agencies demand individuals who are strategic thinkers, diplomatic and prepared to work long hours. And those employed by media owners tend to enjoy a sales-based environment, like to see quick results for their efforts, and will usually earn more money.”

    Madison

    Punitha talks at breakneck pace, barely pausing for breath, whether she’s discussing the controversial subject of commissions or winning at Cannes.

    “My growth in Madison has been phenomenal and the learning has not stopped,” she points out. At Madison, all the pitches that she led and won have made people take notice of her. “When I joined, the Mumbai office was just handling Godrej and Proctor & Gamble. Today, we have most of the blue chip accounts like Asian Paints, Cadbury’s, Essel Group, TVS, Tata Tea, General Motors, Mother Diary, Mcdonalds, Marico, Airtel, Tata AIG, Radio Mirchi, Kotak among many others.”

    Punitha has helped Madison Media grow more than treble in growth from a mere Rs 3 billion in billings to Rs 10 billion in the space of just five years.

    “When I first joined, we were concentrating on consolidating our current businesses like Procter & Gamble, Coke and Godrej, then over a period of time realized that we need to grow. So, we focused on new businesses and started participating in pitches. We had to grow for our own learning experience and as a confidence building measure for our existing clients.”

    This passion for looking after advertisers’ interests has an air of poacher turned gamekeeper about it, given her time on the agency side of life. There’s no doubt however, that it has given her a keen understanding of the industry, and she still tries to bring that “service” aspect to Madison.

    She agrees that the best thing about agencies is that one is surrounded by very bright people and one gets to see the thinking that goes on behind different clients. On her achievements in Madison, she says, “Retaining our existing clients and keeping them happy is my first achievement. When we grow, we tend to lose perspective of all who help us in our initial stages, and it’s all because of the client one expects to gain in the future. For me, it is important to hold on to our current businesses as we grow.”

    Considering her current job as her ideal job, she says, “Work is the only thing that matters to Sam. Managing this organization is great as it’s a place of great integrity. There is no conning, inside and outside the system, neither with clients. When one works in such an healthy environment where there is no politics and no pressures to make money at the cost of someone else, and, all we need to know is how to do a good job, there is very little scope of going wrong.”

    Says she, “The toughest part about becoming senior is having to let go of the fun that one gets when you handle the nitty-gritties of media planning and buying on a client… I would rather be a media planner than a CEO at heart… but, guess one needs to move up to let others who work with you grow. Even today, the toughest thing for me is to let someone work on a presentation or plan or analysis instead of pulling it and doing it myself.”

    Punitha has been ranked amongst the top ten influential persons in media for the last two years in The Brand Equity Agency reckoner. Her motto for success is straightforward. She says: “Apart from working hard, we don’t play games. As a corporate philosophy, we don’t pitch with rates. We work within a set framework and at times, and we often refuse clients whose philosophy and expectations are so different from ours. She gives importance to honesty and fairness and strongly believes in “letting others around you succeed and grow so that you automatically grow.” And to keep herself on her toes, she surrounds herself with people who challenge her.

    “I am very clear that if I am in the agency business in India, then there is no place to be in other than Madison,” says Punitha emphatically.

    Among her best moments so far, she says, “Not losing a business that I have directly worked on and winning the Media Lions at the Advertising Festival in Cannes this year. But, I think, managing people, clients, media owners and egos everyday and being able to deliver to keep them happy is a constant high by itself.”

    She admits that days of being a complete workaholic and leaving office at 2-3 am are a rarity as she makes it a point to leave office at 7 pm to make time for family and friends. Says she: “Lynn used to always say that as great it is to have a career, its that important to have other interests, too.”

    On decisions at a career level, she says, “Sam did offer me the opportunity to head Madison (all India) a few years back when CVL Srinivas had left. But, I took the decision of not going for it, as I felt I was not ready for it and thought it was not in the larger interest of the organisation. So, we gave others in our system the opportunity to grow up to that level. As tough a decision it was for my personal career, but, I think looking back it was the right decision, as today, I am a better professional and Madison a stronger organisation because of it. Sam and I have always been able to discuss anything.”

    And, speaking of lessons learnt dealing with clients, Punitha says, “At times when a client was being unreasonable I took a stance so that it become confrontational. Over the years, I have realised that one must never reduce any situation to a confrontation but always make it a dialogue.”

    Any career decision is a combination of personal, business and timing issues. She believes there are benefits in working both sides of the fence. Punitha sums up her experiences in all three agencies as having “learnt media basics” in O&M, “learnt to manage media and clients” at Lintas and “learnt to manage a business” at Madison.

    Punitha considers herself lucky to have worked with the best media minds in India like Roda Mehta, Lynn Dsouza, Ambika Srivastava, and now Sam Balsara. She holds them in high respect and speaks of what she has learnt from them.

    Roda Mehta: “Everybody looked up to her. I never really worked with her except when I was sent to Mumbai for a training session and I was exposed to her style of working. “

    Lynn DeSouza: “The credit of my becoming the media professional I have solely goes to her. She gave me tremendous freedom. She was always there when if a problem arose. “

    Ambika Srivastava: “I admire Ambika’s analytical skills.”

    Sam Balsara: “He has taught me to be a great manager. One can’t ask for a better boss. There are no secrets between us. He would never take a step concerning me without taking me into confidence and likewise, I trust him with everything. Madison matters to both of us and we both work to see it grow.”

    She lists a few current issues that are on top of her agenda:

    • Paucity of people: To overcome this, we go to institutes and recruit freshers as trainees.
    • Data vs Instinct: Too much dependence on data that we are losing our instincts.
    • Break boundaries: There is a sense of doing the same thing better and better over the years instead of attempting to do them differently. We need to create a competitive difference that works in the market as media plans across agencies have all started looking similar.
    • Breaking the 3.5 per cent barrier in terms of commission: The traditional split of the 15 per cent commission between the creative agency and the media agency is 11.5 per cent and 3.5 per cent. However, over the decades, media has become a lot more expensive in terms of people, databases, systems, infrastructural requirements etc and this industry benchmark of 3.5 per cent commission makes operating the media business profitably a little difficult. A creative agency needs minds whereas a media agency needs minds and infrastructure.

      Punitha says it is a pleasure to be a woman in this industry as “it sometimes makes it difficult for the others to say a ‘NO’. Adding that, today, the males have it tougher in media as they fight the increasing female dominance in the industry.”

    In these times of increased viewer choices and audience fragmentation, she says that it is the best time to be in media as it has never been more challenging or confusing. She says, “The chaos will increase, disruptive thinking is the way of the future. More than numbers it will be consumer media insights that will drive the media decisions in future.”

    Punitha likes to be extremely low profile and hates to be quoted in any Madison press releases. She is known to give the right angle to any story and guiding journalists when asked for stories or quotes, rather than seeing her name in print. She explains: “I would rather Sam and the others in the team take the limelight rather than me. As long as I know that I have contributed to the success am happy, I don’t feel the need to prove myself to others outside the system.”

    She also credits Sam Balsara with getting her to socialize and attend corporate dos. “Before coming to Madison, I would always duck all the media sellers’ bashes. Sam has been instrumental in making me change as he believes that when a person takes the effort to invite you, it is courtesy to accept and attend the do.”

    She agrees that it has helped make her a more extroverted person and, more importantly, has helped her in building strong relationships.

    Though good at managing the agency’s finances, she admits to have very little sense managing what she earns. She whispers: “Sam is aghast and has threatened to keep away a part of my earnings. All I had were a few LIC policies. Even today, I am broke at the end of the month. As I was when I was a fresher… just don’t know where the money goes.”

    She used to hate traveling (“I need my bed at the end of a long day and there is no concept of home when one is on the move”) but, she has learnt to enjoy the frequent and long journeys as “they give her time to reflect, relax and meet new people.”

    She is a Hindi movie buff and makes it a point to regularly go to a multiplex – and forget about the intricacies of media and running a business – and get involved with what’s happening on the big screen – a catharsis of sorts. Says she: “Every Saturday night is spent watching a Hindi film with a friend, however trashy it may be.”

    Punitha is a hopeless romantic. Though she avoids reading business magazines, she is an avid reader of fiction and non-fiction books, especially of the romantic genre. That explains her desire to one day set up a bookshop with a café where couples can sit, listen to music and read romantic bestsellers.

    When asked why she has not tested any other medium, she says, “The reason I stick to media despite all the pressures and daily crisis, is because it makes my adrenaline pump all the time. I would not know how to handle a non-pressure job. I probably will wilt away due to boredom I think.”

    With 16 years in this field, she has both the experience and the confidence to have her own fully developed take on a wide range of issues. Balsara’s instincts about her taking on a managerial role proved right as she has shown that she has the skills to work on both sides. Getting to where she is by doing the right thing, the right way is what matters most professionally to her. “I would prefer to compromise on success and fail knowing that I have tried hard…knowing that I have not had to resort to any hanky-panky to reach where we are,” she points out.

    She shares close ties with her entrepreneur sister and her 12 year old niece Priyanka (in pic above), who she says, ‘is the most pampered brat in the whole world.’

    “Chatting with my mother, sister and niece, music and reading trash romances, meeting with my friends, gyming and swimming are what I enjoy doing.”

    Punitha is currently working on overcoming all her fears. “I have a fear of water so am learning swimming. I also have a fear of pets so am currently getting a Yorkshire Terrier and am planning to learn flying and driving on Mumbai roads.

    Another stress buster for her is shopping. “I can shop forever for trinkets, clothes and yes diamonds.”

    She is not one to hold grudges, She forgets and forgives easily. “I am the first to say a sorry when I am in the wrong, irrespective of how young or old, the other person is.”

    On her single status: I moved very fast in my career and marriage just did not happen. Today, I love my space too much.

    Pet peeve: Getting no time to relax and can never hold onto my maid and driver for long.

    Dream gizmo: The treadmill.

    Favourite holiday spot: Currently Egypt and home in Chennai.

    Worst nightmare: Boredom with nothing to do.

    How you view India today: The best place to live in and work.

    One drawback: We are so much better than what we project ourselves to be.

    What makes you laugh: Anything and everything when I am in a great mood, Sometimes nothing can.

    Two guests you would love to dine with?
    On my recent visit to Egypt, I met this amazing Egyptologist called Shref. Meeting him made a difference to my life as he made me reset priorities in my life. He has inspired me to live life to the fullest. My niece because in her company, she makes me feel young and behave like a twelve year old too.

  • Draft Broadcast Bill: Big brother wants to do more than just watch

    Draft Broadcast Bill: Big brother wants to do more than just watch

    The draft broadcast regulations that the government is trying to put in place has its merits and demerits, but what is shocking is the way the lawmakers are going about the whole thing, most of which is shrouded in secrecy.

    That the draft Broadcasting Services Regulation Bill 2006, doing the rounds of ministries for feedback, is restrictive — to put it mildly — and draconian in parts is a story itself. But what is a bigger story is an attempt by the Congress-led coalition government to steamroll legislation through without taking industry stakeholders and others into confidence, thus making a mockery of democratic norms.

    It is a calculated effort to muzzle the media in general and incapacitate the electronic medium, which has its own powers because of the impact of visuals, in particular.
    _____****_____

    The attempt of the information and broadcasting ministry to quietly draft regulations for the Cabinet’s consideration, while denying at the same time that anything of that sort even exists, amplifies that the blustering of I&B minister Priya Ranjan Dasmunsi is not all gas. It is a calculated effort to muzzle the media in general and incapacitate the electronic medium, which has its own powers because of the impact of visuals, in particular.

    Cross media restrictions, powers bestowed on authorities to take action against the media and TV channels on the flimsiest of grounds, content censorship (which is being drafted separately, but could be made part of this Bill or legislation at a later stage) are all aimed at strangling the media.

    What make things scary is that the proposed autonomous Broadcast Regulatory Authority of India (Brai) has been given powers that permit it to run amok if interpreted incorrectly by it. Especially when Brai’s chief executive would be a serving government official of additional secretary’s rank, drawing a salary from the government and, naturally, having allegiance to the government.

    The flip side is that not all the clauses in the draft Broadcast Bill 2006 are new. Some of them do exist in some form or other in the Cable TV Network (Regulation) Act and other pieces of media legislation. References to cross media restrictions were made in the Broadcast Bill of 1997 too. And remember that never got past a joint parliamentary committee set up to examine it after being tabled in Parliament.

    The 1997 Bill stated that a person or a company will be allowed to hold licences in only one of the following category of services: Terrestrial Radio Broadcasting, Terrestrial Television Broadcasting, Satellite Television or Radio Broadcasting, DTH Broadcasting, Local Delivery Services and any other category of services, which may be notified by the Central government.

    In 1997, restriction of monopolies was more targeted towards newspaper houses. The Bill then had said that no proprietor of a newspaper will either be a participant with “more than 20 per cent interest in or control a body corporate, which is the holder of a licence to provide a licensed service under this Act.”

    Without criticizing a government’s right to make a law, what needs to be seen in a broader context is the way that right is used in a democratic setup.
    _____****_____

    This time round, the government has allowed interest in various segments of the media business, but capped them so low that effective concentration of power is totally neutralised to the extent of threatening to destroy various business models.

    Without criticizing a government’s right to make a law, what needs to be seen in a broader context is the way that right is used in a democratic setup.

    If we examine the draft of the content regulation, prepared by a sub-panel of a 30-member committee overseen by I&B secretary SK Arora, it hints at stringent content regulation, particularly for news channels. If okayed by lawmakers in its present state, it could well be the end of sting operations and coverage of issues where high profile politicians and personalities are involved.

    Sample this part: “TV channels must not use material relating to a person’s personal or private affairs or which invades an individual’s privacy unless there is an identifiable public interest reason for the material to be broadcast.”

    Who decides what constitutes an individual’s privacy? The government or the regulator? What this means of course is that it’s all up for interpretation.

    It is this scope for interpretation that is the most fearful aspect of this bill. More so since the onus of proving identifiable public interest lies with the TV channel and not the other way round.

    Additionally, the flat-footedness of the media industry and lack of consensus on important issues amongst the various stakeholders is incomprehensible, to say the least. The surprise that the draft Broadcast Bill 2006 — even if it’s an early draft for argument’s sake — has sprung on the TV industry, shows that people have been caught napping. Or, the industry thought the government was just talking gas.

    Either way, Delhi seems to be having the last laugh. Hang on, maybe not yet. There may still be some time left for saner voices in the government to stand up.

    But for that to happen, the media industry needs to project a united stand. Something like what was demonstrated when the Rajiv Gandhi government in 1988 had attempted to bring in a piece of legislation to muzzle the media. It took weeks of concerted opposition from Indian journalists to scupper an initiative to revise the law on defamation. It may be recalled that the government had rushed the Defamation Bill through the lower house of Parliament in August of that year.

    When we last commented on the ramifications of the Broadcast Bill, we expressed the view that there is a feeling of déj? vu that it may be another exercise in futility.

    It could well be in the industry’s collective interest to ensure that the draconian aspects of the Broadcast Bill suffer the same fate as the Defamation Bill of 1988.

    There are several ways of voicing their grievances and making sure that the industry voice reaches the powers-that-be. Indiantelevision.com believes it can function as a forum for debate, and would love to have comments from various constituents of the industry on the Broadcast Bill 2006.

    Send in your mails to editor@indiantelevision.com. And let’s work towards building a more robust television sector – keeping in mind the government, the industry and foremost of all, the consumer.

  • Dish TV: Scaling up on numbers & value proposition

    Zee Telefilms chairman Subhash Chandra is on a roll. The resurgence of flagship Hindi entertainment channel Zee TV has come after years of slippage since Kaun Banega Crorepati catapulted Star plus into leadership position.

    But this is not just about Zee TV‘s prime time assault on Star Plus; it is also about how Chandra has streamlined his media empire to give it the right focus, resources and value. His announcement on 29 March: Zee Telefilms will be de-merged into four separate entities. While cable business will come under Wire and Wireless India Ltd (WWIL), Dish TV will handle the DTH operations. News and regional channels are being consolidated in Zee News Ltd. Under the umbrella of Zee Telefilms will be the newly launched Zee Sports.

    The “sum total of the parts” concept ignited the scrip which, once hovering around Rs 130-150 in mid-2005, has breached the 200-mark and closed today at Rs 222.

    In the second of a four-part series, Indiantelevision.com takes an in-depth look into the de-merged DTH business of Zee Telefilms.

    The battle for supremacy between News Corp chairman Rupert Murdoch and Subhash Chandra will be extended to the DTH arena this year. The commercial launch of Tata Sky, a 80:20 joint venture between Tata Group and Star (now expected to happen only some time in August-September), will see a hell of a scramble for subscribers with focus on pricing, quality of service, value-added services and marketing.

    Chandra‘s gameplan is to build a sizeable early lead before the fight for share in the market takes shape. Having launched Dish TV over two years back, he has already snapped up 1.15 million DTH subscribers. And he expects to mop up an additional one million by the end of this fiscal.

    Even before Tata Sky can settle down and get its products out of the door, Chandra is in a hurry to launch an array of value-added services. Movie-on-demand is already available and soon to launch is gaming and interactivity. The idea is to fill up the product portfolio as quickly as possible.

    Working on the content side, he has recently stitched a deal with SET-Discovery to offer a bouquet of 12 channels on his platform. Star‘s channels should also come on board, perhaps closer to launch of Tata Sky. Armed with full content, Dish TV will be able to aggressively target more urban and upscale subscribers in the course of the year.

    The DTH operations has already consumed a net expense of Rs 3.8 billion. A further investment of Rs 2.5 billion has been lined up over a two-year period, mainly to subsidise the set-top boxes (STBs). “But we are sitting on a dynamic model and if Tata Sky and us are aggressively competing on pricing, there is a possibility of the subsidy amount further increasing. It is a factor of what strategies we adopt to develop our subscriber base,” says Essel Group CEO of corporate strategy Rajiv Garg.

    Placing his bets on both cable and DTH, Chandra ensured that he started operations much before Murdoch could jump over the regulatory hurdles. The strategy was in place: mobilise the cable dark and rural subscribers, offer them a basic bandwidth of channels, tie up content as they come, drive in volumes and command clout.

    The start was slow. Then came the “dish-har-chhat-par” (a dish on every rooftop) pricing scheme of Rs 3,990 (almost halving the hardware prices and subscription fees for a year) last April and the market in specific territories just opened up.

    Targeting DD Direct‘s customers, Dish TV also announced a “Dish Freedom Package” plan in January. This offers viewers 40 channels in digital quality without charging any monthly subscription fee, but they had to make a one-time investment of Rs 2,690 in a digi box. Clearly, the strategy was to get into a different segment of customers and slowly entice them to upgrade to the other packages.

    Dish TV‘s subscriber base grew and by the end of FY06 it touched close to one million. Almost 70 per cent of the consumers came from the cable dry and smaller towns, but it suited Chandra to an extent by giving him a headstart over Murdoch. As he also has presence in cable TV, his muscle in the distribution business has grown.

    A fallout of this model, though: low ARPUs (average revenue per user). While revenue from DTH operations stood at Rs 818 million for FY06, net loss was at Rs 790 million on the back of subsidies and marketing expenses. The ARPU by the end of the year was hovering around Rs 190.

    The task this year will, thus, be to drive up the ARPUs to at least Rs 250. The content tie up with Sony and later Star will help achieve this. After the deal with SET-Discovery, Dish TV has increased the price of its basic tier by Rs 38. “By providing the first year subscription for free, Dish TV‘s financials don‘t reflect the paying capacity of the subscribers. But if consumers decide to continue with the service after this period, the incremental subscription revenues from the DTH venture would be sizeable. The problem will arise if they decide to drop out at the time of renewal,” says an analyst.

    Dish TV is also banking on value-added services (VAS) to realise more from subscribers. Says Garg, “Beginning 1 September, VAS will be accounted for separately from the ARPUs. We expect VAS to average Rs 40 per subscriber. Since this will be for a stretch of seven months, the average during the fiscal will work out to Rs 22-23,” says Garg.

    Dish TV‘s revenue projections look healthy. For FY07, the target is fixed at Rs 3.2 billion on a subscriber base of 2.4 million and an ARPU of Rs 250. And in FY08, the turnover is expected to touch Rs 8 billion as subscribers rise to 3.15 million and ARPU to Rs 310.

    An analyst at a trading firm is optimistic about Dish TV‘s growth. “Even after the launch of Tata Sky, the DTH market is large enough to provide space for growth to the two service providers,” he says.

    Dish TV, however, will continue to be in a net loss situation this fiscal. According to a report on Zee by a brokering firm, Dish TV‘s net loss will be Rs 368.4 million while subscribers are expected to grow to 2.07 million and revenue to Rs 3.29 billion on an ARPU of Rs 250. But the picture changes completely in FY08 and the operations become profitable, says the firm.

    The situation, though, is completely fluid and a lot will depend on how Tata Sky prices its services. DTH takeoff will also have to factor in the responses from the cable TV industry and the entry of other DTH operators like Anil Ambani‘s Reliance with its Blue magic offering and Kalanithi Maran‘s Sun Group with Sun Direct.

    So far, Chandra has been clever not to alienate the cable TV operators but play safe on both the platforms. Tata Sky, on the other hand, has drawn hostility from the operators with its MDU (multi-dwelling unit) technology in high-rise residential buildings.

    Prices could plummet if competition intensifies, putting profitability under threat. Tata Sky, in fact, has indicated a monthly subscription price of Rs 250 for all the Hindi channels and an upper-end fee of Rs 550, according to a dealer. It is also expected to subsidise heavily the hardware costs. “The pricing is very tentative at this stage and executives from Tata Sky will have a meeting with the dealers closer to date of launch,” he adds. Tata Sky CEO Vikram Kaushik was not available for comment.

    For an infant business venture, DTH operators may not worry about profitability at such an early stage. Their main concern will be to allow the market to expand, acquire customers, keep them locked over a longer period, and then make them pay more for various services. Volumes is what all of them will be hunting for.

    Dish TV‘s pricing strategy so far has reflected this line of thinking. It has promoted the DTH service packages with a lock-in period bundled along with the initial subscription. Says Garg, “The bulk of the subscription selling has been on the business of this bundle which includes a subsidy element. Subscription revenue, thus, starts typically one year after the creation of the subscriber relationship. So you would see these one million subscribers in FY06 gradually come into the subscription fold during this year.”

    Chandra, meanwhile, is sprucing up the distribution network. Dish TV recently tied up with HCL Infosystems for a five-year partnership to utilise the IT major‘s distribution and service support across the country. While Dish TV will immediately double its distribution reach with this tie-up, the alliance will enable HCL Infosystems to offer digital entertainment services as part of its digital lifestyle portfolio.

    Dish TV has also addressed another problem: how to increase offerings by accommodating more channels per transponder. It has recently tied up with Scopus Video Networks, a provider of digital video networking products. Having taken seven transponders on NSS-6, Dish TV can pack up to 150 channels using this compression technology.

    “Scopus‘ product line will help us achieve very high satellite utilisation and bring down costs on a per channel basis. We plan to implement this better compression technology within a month. We will be able to increase our capacity to 150 channels,” says Essel Group director of technology Amitabh Kumar.

    For pursuing plans of offering 200 channels, Dish TV has booked more transponders on NSS. Even when DD Direct Plus, Doordarshan‘s free DTH service, migrates from NSS-6 to Insat 4B, Dish TV will face no space crunch. “We can bunch all the DD channels into one transponder. We have also requested for more transponders on NSS-6 which will be available during the course of the year for us,” says Kumar. Dish TV currently offers 110 channels in addition to the 33 channels of DD Direct Plus which are also available to its consumers.

    So ahead of the skirmish, Chandra has strengthened his armoury. Sure enough, the war for DTH subscribers is about to begin and escalate.

  • Digital cable heart of Zee’s WWIL story

    Zee Telefilms chairman Subhash Chandra is on a roll. The resurgence of flagship Hindi entertainment channel Zee TV has come after years of slippage since Kaun Banega Crorepati catapulted Star plus into leadership position.

    But this is not just about Zee TV‘s prime time assault on Star Plus; it is also about how Chandra is preparing for the big fight against Rupert Murdoch in the direct-to-home (DTH) space which will determine who will dominate the broadcasting business.

    Laying the preparatory ground, Chandra has streamlined his media empire to give it the right focus, resources and value. His announcement on 29 March: Zee Telefilms will be de-merged into four separate entities. While cable business will come under Wire and Wireless India Ltd (WWIL), Dish TV will handle the DTH operations. News and regional channels are being consolidated in Zee News Ltd. Under the umbrella of Zee Telefilms will be the newly launched Zee Sports.

    The “sum total of the parts” concept ignited the scrip which, once hovering around Rs 130-150 in mid-2005, has breached the 200-mark and closed today at Rs 227.

    In the first of a four-part series, Indiantelevision.com takes an in-depth look into the de-merged cable business of Zee Telefilms.

    Subhash Chandra sees a golden opportunity in the cable TV business becoming a crown jewel in his media empire. His new mantra: digitalisation, broadband and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP).

    Media czar Subhash Chandra

    Having built the largest network in the country with a base of 6.8 million subscribers, Chandra has set upon himself the task of refashioning the business model to discover hidden value. His first step: to hive off the cable assets into a separate company, Wire and Wireless India Ltd (WWIL), as it would allow for better allocation of capital and management resources.

    Jagjit Singh Kohli, a doyen in the industry, is put at the steering wheel to chalk out a comprehensive business plan. “We have identified cable distribution as a thrust area. We are building a separate team under Kohli to work out the full plan. Digital cable will help push up the ARPUs (average revenue per user). We can also share the infrastructure with telecom companies for voice services,” Chandra told analysts at a meeting after announcing his de-merger plans.

    Chandra is weary of the fact that multi-system operators (MSOs) have been incurring historical losses in an unorganised sector dominated by last mile operators (LMOs) who terribly under-report subscriber numbers. For the fiscal ended March 2006, Zee‘s cable business barely managed to post an operating profit of Rs 17 million on a revenue of Rs 1.5 billion. Lack of addressability in the industry has, in fact, dragged down valuations of analogue cable networks.

    Making digital cable the heart of WWIL‘s growth strategy, Chandra has earmarked an investment of Rs 5 billion over three years to charge up the business. “The minimum we will be pumping in this fiscal is Rs 600 million. But we are working on two models and if we are able to push digitalisation in a big way, we will actually be investing Rs 1.3 billion this year,” says Essel Group CEO of corporate strategy and finance Rajiv Garg.

    After Delhi, a digital headend is being set up in Mumbai, a lucrative market where WWIL currently has a small presence. Kolkata, Bangalore and Hyderabad are some other cities which will also inhabit the digital map.

    That does not mean that analogue expansion will be abandoned. WWIL is best poised to take up this role as, with a huge pile up of Zee channels, there are broadcasting interests to protect in an environment where cable bandwidth is choked. Siticable (earlier name of Zee‘s cable company), in fact, swung into action last year to snap up RPG-promoted Indian Cable Net, the biggest MSO in Kolkata. Spoiling Kalanithi Maran‘s SCV plans, the acquisition established Siticable as the leading MSO with a market share of over 60 per cent.

    Siticable has also taken on lease two prominent cable networks of Bangalore, Ice Network and Atria Network. In Hyderabad talks with Maran to tie up against Hathway Cable & Datacom were initiated but failed. Expansion through affiliation schemes to existing cable networks is also much on the agenda.

    By aggressively pursuing such plans, Chandra feels his cable business is sure to find a pot of gold. He has put WWIL‘s valuation in the region of $800-900 million (Rs 36-40.5 billion).

    Just over six years back, Chandra had bought out News Corp‘s 50 per cent stake of Siticable at a valuation of Rs 15 billion. So how does he arrive at such a steep rise in valuation now?

    The calculation runs somewhat like this: Siticable gets paid for a million homes which, according to Chandra, can attract a valuation of $500 (Rs 22,500) per subscriber. For the balance 5.8 million subscribers (for which Siticable is not paid), he puts a value of $50 (Rs 2,250) per subscriber, taking the total worth of the network to around $800 million.

    Since the buyout in 1999, Chandra believes a turnaround in valuations is possible for two basic reasons: conditional access system (CAS), which will ensure rollout of digital cable TV in the country; and potential of cable to get into the arena of triple play convergence – voice, data and video.
     

    “We are bullish about our cable business. We can attract investors in our distribution businesses in cable and direct-to-home (DTH),” Chandra had told Indiantelevision.com soon after announcing de-merger of Zee Telefilms into four individual entities.

    On annual revenue of Rs 1.5 billion, investors have to really bet their money on future earnings of the cable industry. The ARPU is around $3.5 a month, meaning a massive scale up has to take place.

    A question that analysts ask is: how does he put a value of $50 for the 5.8 million subscribers which WWIL is not paid for?

    A research firm has put the enterprise value (EV) of WWIL at $670 million (Rs 30.15 billion). This is based on EV per subscriber of $100 (with 6.7 million subscribers).

    Traditional cable valuations have been high but not at the level Chandra is looking at. Hathway was valued at $225 million and Star took a 26 per cent stake for $75 million, paying for a presence in distribution after exiting from Siticable and hype on IP-driven content. Even after adding size to the network, digital cable to a small extent and broadband growth, analysts put Hathway‘s current valuation at $400-500 million. Hinduja-owned Incablenet has also got on Intel and Kudelski to invest at huge valuations, but these have been small stakes in the company.

    What has changed this time, though, is CAS. This changes the business model of MSOs as it gives them direct control of the last mile subscribers.

    For getting an investor at the valuation that Chandra wants, WWIL will have to get in digital cable. Besides, it needs to have more control over the LMOs. The pot of gold, after all, resides in the last-mile system. CAS, or addressability, will instantly ignite valuations when it comes, but at the moment it looks some distance away.

    Chandra‘s corporate restructuring, however, has come at the right time. Telecom majors like Reliance Infocomm are feeling the need of getting access to the last mile through the chain of cable operators for rollout of IPTV. And, if CAS is mandated, international players like Liberty and Comcast will be keen to invest into the existing MSOs as an entry strategy. Private equity investors will also find cable worth putting their bets on.

    WWIL CEO J S Kohli

    Some investment bankers feel Hathway is handicapped in a way as, with Star as a 26 per cent partner, the MSO will find it difficult to woo in strategic investors. Even getting in private equity participation will require the approval of Star. Incablenet, on the other hand, may find reason to opt only for a strategic investor as it does not have any broadcast ownership.

    Chandra can find a business case in expanding analogue business, particularly in territories where it can rake in carriage fees from broadcasters, with the strategy of putting digital later on the platform. In this arena, WWIL can be more aggressive than rival networks Incablenet and Hathway and may not even face competition from them. For Incablenet, the focus will be on converting its existing network into digital cable. As for Hathway, future expansion strategies will depend on how much Star is prepared to invest to support these plans. With Tata Sky, Star also has an interest in promoting its DTH business.

    The tough question is: where and how can WWIL find the space to expand its footprint?

    In the southern region, Tamil Nadu and Kerala will be impossibly tough territories to crack with Maran‘s SCV and Rajan Raheja‘s Asianet Satellite Communications Ltd. having a dominating presence. As for Andhra Pradesh, WWIL will have to regain lost ground in Hyderabad where it has not been getting signals from Star and Sony-Discovery bouquets after Hathway was appointed as distributor of these channels. Karnataka is a different story as WWIL has a sizeable presence in Bangalore, though it is yet to roll out digital services.

    “We are plotting plans to revive our network in Andhra Pradesh. We will soon have a strategy in place,” says a Siticable joint venture partner in Hyderabad.

    In Madhya Pradesh, the main markets of Bhopal and Indore are dominated by Bhaskar Multi Net Ltd, promoted by print media giant Bhaskar group. Rajasthan Patrika owners have also diversified into cable. Though Kolkata is under the grip of WWIL, it will be difficult to extend the footprint in the eastern region. Orissa is dominated by Ortel and the other markets may not be attractive.

    WWIL has scope to expand in the smaller towns of western and northern India where it already has a well spread out presence. “It is nice to talk of expansion, but the market reality is different. In Karnataka there is scope to expand but ARPUs are low. It is also difficult to get carriage fees in the southern states where there is no appetite for Hindi content. WWIL can spread its wings in the northern and western regions but has to be careful if it wants to step into non paying and unstable markets,” says a trade analyst.

    The main challenge is to gain market share in Mumbai and Delhi. “WWIL will have to start a war in Mumbai and Delhi by dropping feeder rates to poach distributors and local operators. These will be two big digital markets. If WWIL goes on the offensive, we may have a land grab like situation,” says the analyst.

    Some analysts feel WWIL will have a distinct advantage in case of a fast digital rollout growth. “They have the widest presence and have the largest cable network in the country. They can take advantage of the digital environment and launch a headend-in-the-sky (HITS) platform,” says a market analyst.

    What Chandra needs is to pump in money. As the ideal debt-equity ratio for WWIL is 1:1, getting an investor in would help though it is not imperative. “The net worth of the company currently is not that strong to support that size od debt. We are, after all, planing to invest Rs 5 billion to expand the business,” says Garg.

    Trust the maverick Chandra to make the right move at the opportune moment. Unlike in 2000, Chandra has one advantage in roping in an investor this time. With WWIL getting listed, the piece of cable business in his media empire can be an attractive buy.

  • American television loses an iconic producer in Aaron Spelling

    A few days ago (Friday, 23 June) Aaron Spelling, who holds the Guinness World Record as the most prolific producer in television, passed away. The 83-year-old, who died in his mansion in Los Angeles, had suffered a stroke on 18 June.In a career spanning an astonishing five decades, Spelling, who had a great fear of flying, worked in one form or another on nearly 200 projects on both television and film.

    Such was his sphere of influence that a trivia fact on imdb.com indicates that in the 1970s, when he had one hit show after another, he had so many shows on ABC with who he had a contract that insiders used to joke that ABC stood for “Aaron‘s Broadcasting Company”. He was involved with around 70 weekly television series, which amounted to around 4,220 hours. Back to back it would take 176 days to watch all of them.

    Born into a Jewish family, Spelling, in his early life, had to fight against the tag of being different. He started his career in Hollywood in the 1950‘s. Success did not come in a hurry though. He spent some time as a writer and as a bit-player actor (he was a gas station attendant in an episode of I Love Lucy). He then donned the hat of a producer thanks to a break given by Dick Powell.

    His first hit was the crime drama Burke‘s Law, starring Gene Barry. However it was the next show The Mod Squad in 1969 that paved the way for his path breaking career. In the 1970‘s he cemented his reputation by producing one great show after another. Some of them included S.W.A.T., Starsky and Hutch, Charlie‘s Angels, which were conceptually so appealing that Hollywood, desperately searching for ideas, made them into films a few decades later.

    Charlie‘s Angels showed women in a role other than a homemaker happy with kids. It is justly considered ground breaking in terms of having women who took care of business and did not need a man to look after them. More importantly it gave young girls in the 1970‘s and 1980‘s strong role models to look up to.

    Starsky and Hutch was one of the first great cop shows on American television. It paved the way for numerous cop shows including the likes of Miami Vice.

    There are two clear reasons for Spellings‘ success. One was his keen sense of intuition of what audiences at a particular point of time wanted to watch. The other was the fact that he always respected the viewer. Spelling was also great in the casting arena, a prime example being Charlies Angels which made household names out of Jaclyn Smith, Kate Jackson and most of all, Farrah Fawcett.

    That is a knack he never lost. In the 1990‘s he produced Beverly Hills 90210 which is considered to have defined a generation of privileged youth who despite being surrounded by luxury in the svelte surroundings of Beverly Hills have anger issues. He was astute in casting his daughter Tori Spelling as a teen. While the father and daughter did subsequently have their differences, Tori issued a statement saying that she was glad that she had the chance to reconcile with her dad before he passed away.

    Another piece of great casting was having Joan Collins play the matriarch in the long running soap Dynasty. This show in fact proved that Spelling was comfortable working in different genres.

    Spelling noted that Collins brought a huge aspect of her personality to the role which lent the show more bite. “We wrote a character, but the character could have been played by 50 people and 49 of them would have failed. She made it work.”

    So there was Dynasty on one hand an escapist soap and then there was Family. This was a far more realistic drama that ran from 1976-1980. Spelling had the courage to tackle among other subjects – homosexuality which even now Hollywood is skittish about tackling. Dynasty too had a gay character. More recently Spelling was involved with the supernatural show Charmed which airs in India on Star World.

    Recently, 7th Heaven passed The Waltons and Little House on the Prairie as the longest-running family drama.

    In real life Spelling had a 123 room mansion in Los Angeles which many considered to be a parallel to the life of ease and excess that the rich characters in Dynasty lived. “The house that Dynasty built‘ is how tour operators describe his mansion to hordes of tourists. In fact, Spelling was known to on occasion wave a hello to tourists. the soure of his wealth came from Spelling-Goldberg Productions. In 1986 the company went public.

    Spelling may have made escapist crowd pleasing fare, but he was also not shy of working on projects that took a hard look at subjects. An example is the film And The Band Played On which looked at how Aids would not have been such a menace had the authorities paid more attention during the early days.

    As far as the critics were concerned Spelling had a choice to make. As he once said in an AP interview way back in 1986, “The knocks by the critics bother you, but you have a choice of proving yourself to 300 critics or 30 million fans.” Going by the ratings and the enduring appeal that his shows constantly got over the years, Spelling can rest in peace knowing that he fulfilled a mission that other producers will be lucky to come anywhere close to achieving.

  • DD Deputy Director-General Marketing Vijaylaxmi Chhabra

    DD Deputy Director-General Marketing Vijaylaxmi Chhabra

    It’s one thing to have a good work ethic. It’s another thing to be a workaholic – a combination of both best describes Doordarshan deputy director general (Marketing) Vijayalaxmi Chhabra. Twenty-six years working at the public broadcaster, of which the last six years have been in this current job, she personifies a woman of talent, grace and humility.

    DD’s deputy director general (marketing) Vijayalaxmi Chhabra

    Chhabra has been exposed to every possible managerial function in All India Radio. And, in DD, she has gone through the learning curve of creating an entire marketing set up for Doordarshan, channel marketing and management of the DD News channel, combined radio & TV marketing, DTH and to a small extent, the Internet business.

    In her transition from AIR to Doordarshan (DD), Chhabra has been able to bring across a range of key learnings, the most critical being her continual drive to perform. She has learnt to never take anything for granted: “The last victory was the last, and what is important now is the next one” is testament to an enviable and indisputable, record of well-honed leadership skills.

    Being a driven, results oriented individual is good when harnessed by an honourable purpose. The initial attempts to reinvent the public broadcaster into a commercial player had a lot of critics. Revamping Doordarshan was one thing, following up with a sales blitz was something else altogether. But, Chhabra managed both by taking it up as a challenge and single minded focus to achieve what most thought was a lost cause.

    Earliest childhood memories

    One among four children, Chhabra hails from Orissa. She grew up in the small but modern and forward looking steel township of Bhilai in what is today’s Chattisgarh. Her father was a reputed senior engineer and part of the team that built the Bhilai Steel Plant. It was the biggest steel plant in Asia at that time and she remembers him returning home every evening, with blueprint designs of the plant and saying, “We are all building modern India.”

    “My father believed that building India’s modern steel plant was a step towards building modern India and instilled in me a strong value system which has always stood me in good stead in my professional and personal life,” remembers Chhabra.

    “Similarly, my mother is a very liberal and forward looking woman and her family was involved with the freedom movement and their generation was driven by the fact that they were witnessing the birth of independent India. They were hoping to see India self sufficient and belonged to the post independence generation who were full of pride for their country.”

    Chhabra had a privileged childhood, studied in a school run by the management and belonged to an entire young generation in the township, brimming with patriotism and steel in character. “A childhood spent in the Steel City was a fascinating and wonderful experience during a period in which Pandit Nehru, who used to refer to the steel plant as the modern temple of India, often came visiting. We grew up being proud of a nation taking birth.”

    The freedom struggle and many other events have shaped her thinking and world view. It was a period of metamorphosis during which the United Nations was unfolding, India had given the world Panchsheel and was on the threshold of signing the Non-Alignment Treaty and the Third World was transforming into a global force.

    “I had the opportunity to read Tolstoy, Gorky and Chekov and this exposure to a wide range of literature during my formative years has left a deep impression on my thinking which has been influenced by the 19th century liberalism that was so imprinted in these novels.”

    What makes you laugh? The daily trials and tribulations of life wherein you spend a greater part of your time traveling to work which is more than your lunch time

    “The people in and around at that time were not enamoured by the lure of work or study in the US or UK but had a desire to do something tangible for the country. My entire personality has been defined and cast in foundries of idealism, hard work and aspirations and love for the country which are still a driving force for me,” says Chhabra.

    Education

    Having excelled in her school Board exams, Chhabra got admission into the top three colleges in Delhi. Her father selected Indraprashtha College (IP) because of its incredible history. IP attracted the cream of intelligentsia from all over India. “I owe a lot to the strong groundings at this college which is the oldest women’s college of Delhi founded by Dr Annie Besant, as part of her effort to empower Indian women to spearhead the freedom movement.”

    “The college faculty comprised reputed writers and theatre personalities and educationists like Dr Sheela Uttam Singh, Indu Jain, Aruna Sitesh, Rathi Bartholomew, Aruna Roy and other national personalities who took us beyond books and imparted in us a sense of commitment, sincerity and the inherent pride to be a woman.”

    “I acquired a post-graduate Masters in International Relations and was also actively involved in student politics.” She was president of IP College Students Union.

    Politics, ICCR & AIR

    In Mumbai, one does not see student politics. But in Delhi, it is a must. She feels strongly that every citizen needs to be politically aware, though not necessarily affiliated to any party. “I had a passion for cultural and performing arts. Former foreign secretary JN Dixit selected me as a programming officer at the Indian Council of Cultural Relations.” Her experience there was a stepping stone for what followed next in her life.

    It was not by accident that Chhabra stumbled into AIR. She had been an ardent listener of AIR, even as a child. She had always harboured a desire to be a broadcaster. Chabbra was also a well known debater in college and Indu Jain sent her to All India Radio (AIR). “Today’s FM is an old concept for us. Yuvani had just come up and we are all products of it. There were two programmes ‘In The Groove’ and ‘Pandrah Se Satrah’ aired daily, where one could pick any topic to talk on and played songs. Apart from doing these programs for AIR, I was anchoring Yuv Manch on Doordarshan every week.”

    “My parents were keen that I appear for the Civil Services exam, and I had to decide on politics or broadcasting, Also, on whether I wanted to remain in Delhi or return to Bhilai,” says Chhabra.

    Why broadcasting? “While politics fascinated me, the studios of All India Radio beckoned my creative instincts and I got very involved with broadcasting. It was an immediate career. I was freelancing whilst studying and yet had made my mark at AIR in a short span as a compere and presenter.”

    UPSC advertised for program executives of the Indian Broadcasting Service and she applied for it. She got through the interview with ease and joined AIR immediately after completing college in 1980. That is when she also met her husband, Manoj Chhabra, who is a chartered accountant by profession. They got married in 1981. And, since then, life has taken its own course.

    The family shifted to Mumbai in 1987 after her husband was transferred from Larsen and Toubro, Delhi to its Mumbai division. “Here, along with various other programs, I did a series of programs and documentaries for AIR on the rights for children of sex workers. Back then, India had taken up the issue of rights of children and The United Nations had held a convention on this. Though it was India’s initiative, we could not ratify the convention because there were too many isssues on children in India and this segment of the population had no rights in India.”

    “I made a documentary ‘Stopped ByThe Redlight’ in 1990 which received the Aakaashwani Annual Award for the best documentary in that year. The only regret I have is that I did not preserve the footage of that radio recording. I thoroughly enjoy doing such programmes. I have worked with AIR in various creative and senior managerial capacities for over 20 years. I have immensely enjoyed creating radio features and documentaries on burning issues.”

    “Till today, I remain a very committed public broadcaster. I was groomed by my seniors to know and realize that radio has its social responsibility. One thing is sure, I will never do frivolous broadcasting.”

    Commonwealth Fellowship & commercial broadcasting

    The Commonwealth Fellowship changed Chhabra’s professional life from a hardcore public broadcaster to a commercial broadcaster. “In 1995, I was awarded the Commonwealth Fellowship and went to London to study commercial broadcasting and its impact on society. Most Indian broadcasters end up doing a project on the BBC. But, on a friend’s suggestion, I did something completely different.

    Franchisement was happening in a big way in England especially around FM radio. “At that time there were already 200 FM stations. I found the topic interesting, as I realized that it would happen in India, at some point soon. I stayed back and the entire study was an eye opener.”

    She confesses, “I used to look down on commercial broadcasting till then, but, this study gave me a whole new insight. I learnt what wonderful things could be done if one had a strong support system, how one could make money and in turn, invest it into good programming.

    This stint abroad definitely did her good, broadening her horizons, helping her adjust to the speed age, learning how to reap the benefits of the commercial broadcasting when incorporated in the industry.

    When she returned from London, the timing was just right for her to take that step forward into commercial broadcasting. FM had just begun happening in India. She was put in charge of AIR’s commercial service and took over Mumbai FM’s radio channel. She was given the task of selling.

    She has earned a reputation of being a tough task master but, one who is always approachable. “I had to work hard at learning the ropes in marketing and I enjoyed every bit of it. It was not difficult because I firmly believe that difficult is doing something one does not enjoy. When I left Mumbai FM, it had touched a revenue of Rs 12 crores (120 million),” says Chhabra.

    Doordarshan

    In a major challenge to satellite channels, beginning 15 August 1999, the government-owned Doordarshan turned its DD-I and DD-II channels into 24-hour affairs. Then, Prasar Bharati’s chief executive officer RR Shah stressed that the choice of programmes would be market-driven, particularly during prime time, and old programmes with poor television rating points, would be removed.

    When Shah asked her to set up the marketing division in Doordarshan, its list of negatives were longer than its positives. Among other things, it also lacked professional manangement in marketing of sports and events.

    “I was asked to set up Prasar Bharati’s marketing division in September 2000 in Mumbai. This was a major turning point in my professional life. I started this division from scratch, and today, this division has been instrumental for Prasar Bharati’s total revenues of Rs 1200 crores this year,” says Chhabra.

    Your worst nightmare: I am paranoid about my family’s well being

    Considered an absolute no-no in government organizations, the management gave Chhabra the freedom to handpick her team. Most of her team is from AIR. “We are all like minded people who don’t think any task is difficult. From a team of seven we are now a team of 20. Being from the radio background, TV and marketing are absolutely new areas for us. DD is a vast organization. Marketing DD, understanding DD, its advertisers, how the market functions – we learnt it all on the job.”

    At the time of taking over as head of marketing of Prasar Bharati, Doordarshan was primarily into selling time slots like real estate. Almost or every event/property on the channel was sold by middlemen in the advertising market for whom DD was a faceless identity.

    “It was very tough to get rid of the middlemen who were so deeply entrenched in our system. At that time, DD’s performance was bad, rates had touched rock bottom and there was undercutting everywhere. With complete support from my management and the team, we achieved the impossible. From a hundred faces that DD was once associated with, we have been able to make it a single face.”

    How did she counter the lobby that tried knocking her down: “Yes, there was a lobby of middlemen, private market agents who marketed primetime and sports, who tried their level best to stall us. But, once the management understood the root cause, then with their support, we completely weeded out the menace of middlemen from our system.

    “Even though DD is a government establishment, it is rewarding to see that in every endeavour to take the channel to new heights and explore new territories, we have not only been able to convince our own management, but also carried the industry along with us to put in place a professional marketing set up in a government broadcasting job.

    “The wholehearted support and complete freedom that our CEO KS Sarma and director general Navin Kumar have given us is a major contributor to achieving these results. We got hold of our big properties- cricket, films and then, DD1 primetime as we earned maximum revenue from it. Along with us, there is another team at Mandi House who had to work equally hard to take initiatives to procure good programs.”

    Also critical has been Chhabra’s preparedness to start from scratch and face a steep learning curve. “When you come in with open eyes, one is more mentally open to changes and different opportunities.” Besides being pro-active, positive, organized and systematic, Chhabra is also known to be a stickler for perfection and has a sharp eye for detail. She strives for quality and class in everything she takes.

    Two guests you would love to dine with?
    With one of her favourite books being Freedom At Midnight, it is not surprising who she would have loved to dine with. “Go back in time and sit across the dining table with Mahatma Gandhi to understand his mind, behind that childlike face, who led India and turned out the best political theories that brought an empire down. (At the cost of sounding clichéd, I am a Gandhian at heart). Film director Ritwik Ghatak is another person she would have loved to meet. His film Meghe Dhaka Tara is still fresh in her mind. From the current generation, she says author Vikram Seth would make an ideal dining companion.

    “Selling is an art. Making a program is easier, but, I took it up as a challenge. To sell crass is easy, but it is very difficult to sell a good program. My endeavour is always to sell something good. -eg- Doordarshan’s Friday/Saturday films are blockbuster films which earn a crore plus and its no big deal. But, we realized we could put this money to good use as we owed it to our viewers. We started showing retrospectives of classics.

    “Selling classics was difficult as our clients felt that it would not deliver TRPs. But, today, this slot is in competition to my Friday slot, in terms of TRPs. We get lots of mail from DD viewers, thanking us for this initiative as it is not available anywhere else. This is what I mean by combining public with commercial broadcasting. One does not have to produce commercially viable programs to make money,” says Chhabra.

    Achievements

    Says Chhabra, “The in-house marketing division reversed the trend of slot selling, and today, we market close to 95 per cent of DD prime time inventory in-house which is a far cry from when we started off. There is no slot selling on DD now. DD buys programs through Self Financing Scheme (SFS) and we sell it and pay the producers after 90 days. Earlier, 20 people were selling the same time band and these marketing agents had become mini DDs in the market.”

    “Creative producers benefited once these agents were eliminated as now they need not bother about selling their programs, and they earn more money from us than before. Once the system was cleaned up, the clients are happy, DD1 rates have doubled and we are able to put all the money we earn into better programs.”

    Even high value properties such as international cricket for which the marketing agents were offering DD a pittance, were taken up as a challenge with astounding results. “My division has had a smooth sailing in international cricket marketing where we have set industry benchmarks. Our revenues have gone up from Rs 50 crores gross revenues in ad sales in the India-West Indies Cricket Series, 2001 to around Rs 180 crores in the India-Pakistan Cricket series, 2005.”

    Your best trait: Humility combined with aggression

    DD had also faced rough weather during the marketing of the India-Australia-South Africa Cricket Series, 2003 comprising 30 days of test cricket which really tested its mettle to the fullest with Indian cricket going through its worst patch.

    Adds Chhabra, “With the changing times and the skyrocketing international cricket marketing benchmarks, we have turned a new chapter in marketing of events on terrestrial through partnership (with Zee Sports in the marketing of the DLF Cup in Abu Dhabi) which is in fact a recognition of DD’s marketing capabilities and standing in the industry.”

    “Once you have a vision of your channel embedded in your mind, a good leader must have the ability to translate this vision on to your core team for executing this vision with proper deadlines and schedules.”

    From a time when the channel was operating on leased inventory through slot marketing today, DD owns the entire IPR for all the programmes being mounted on the channel through SFS. “Under this system, we already have to our credit, mega talent hunt shows like ‘Kalakaarz’ and ‘Wheel Smart Shrimati’.”

    The team that works under Chhabra concur that she knows which event will fetch money and it is her brain and planning that runs the team. Several innovative software being marketed in-house and SFS and vertical associations for software is the way forward for the channel. Every slot today on prime time delivers 3 times the revenue as compared to the previous slot selling experience of DD through sponsored programmes.

    Adds Chhabra, “Two years back, DD-Metro channel was converted to a 24-hour news channel, and my division was asked to take up the channel marketing of DD-News. Right from day one, we had tied up with major brands for long term association on our news channels and had posted revenues of approximately Rs 24 crores in the first year itself which is a record for the news channel genre.”

    “Whether its DD-National or DD-Regional or DD-Sahyadri channel, my division has been able to overhaul the existing marketing systems for these channels and give them a fillip to work in close co-ordination with the industry.”

    Favourite Holiday Spot: Have travelled all over the world, I have loved time spent in Brazil, but London is a special place that I can keep coming back to again and again. It is my memories of my Commonwealth days that takes me back there

    “My driving goal has been to take DD’s in-house marketing into new realms in the changing media scenario, explore all the dimensions offered by the television industry and establish a distinct identity for the channel and the division so as to be able to garner the maximum business and respect of the entire media industry.”

    To job offers from private broadcasters, she says, “I am very proud of the fact that I work here and at all the opportunities, I have received here. I am indebted to this organization for giving me this huge arena to explore my passion for broadcasting.”

    She asks, “Is there any channel as big as DD that can give me the status I have here. If DD can perform, then DD is the biggest and we are all striving to achieve that goal. If I can contribute even an iota to it, I would have made my mark in something I believe in. I have imbibed this sense of pride from my father. My father never left Bhilai steel plant for a private job.”

    The satisfying aspect about her job is definitely the zilch people turnover in his organisation. “The same applies to my team. Most are kids of government officials and they keep getting offers from private firms, But, I don’t think anyone will leave as they come from similar backgrounds like mine and we are all proud of working here. Money is not everything for us. I do not work for money, it’s only my passion that counts. I love my work and I put in long hours, enjoying every moment,” says Chhabra.

    Chhabra gives utmost importance to work and has instilled that confidence in the team that there is nothing one can’t do. She appreciates the team’s work and everything is ‘do or die’ situation for her. There is no hierarchy, ego or show of status. She is clear on the goals of the organization and the team follows suit in fulfilling these goals.

    On exploring other mediums, Chhabra says, “I am always looking out for challenges in every assignment. One must keep growing and pushing ahead at various frontiers. In an emerging media market, you must have the willingness to adapt as the situation demands.”

    “Besides media, teaching is my next biggest interest and I look forward to taking up teaching assignments in the media at a later stage.”

    On whether she faced male dominance in the industry, she says, “I was brought up as an equal at home and as I have mentioned earlier my college empowered me as a woman. I was lucky to have joined a government broadcasting platform where your selection is not on the basis of your gender and only merit prevails. I am proud of the fact that in my career spanning 26 years, I have not come across a single incident of being discriminated against.”

    Family: The real challenge for a working woman today is to manage home and the office where the pressure on both ends is very demanding. “Here, I have been lucky to have supportive in-laws and husband who are proud of me being a working woman. They share my duties at home and even the children have rallied around me and take pride in my work.”

    “I have always lived in a joint family and will always advise young married working girls to live with this support system so that the kids never come back to an empty house. My family motivates me to work single-mindedly on my job.”

    “Inspite of my busy schedule, I made it a point to always find time to teach my children when they were young. My children Mandira (23) and Revant (19) still appreciate the quality time I have spent with them. I consider my family, specially my husband as my pillar of strength.” Her husband is managing director of Prism Cement.

    Future look on the medium in these times of more viewer choices & greater audience fragmentation: “No medium captures the imagination of the Indian audience more than television and radio. Radio is being re-defined with the advent of a host of private broadcasters and it is going to be a space to watch out for. Even community radio will impact students lives all over the country. It will impact the needs and aspirations of the listeners and create a lot more job opportunities for youngsters in smaller towns as well as metros.”

    “Television is already an extremely crowded medium with more than 200 channels fighting for space. The intense competition will ensure that only the best survive. The time is just right for an Indian concept to take the world by a storm.”

    Dream Gizmo: Not techno savvy. It is the man behind the machine that matters

    In the future, we will have programme assessment based on qualitative indices rather than the quantitative numbers of TRPs. The ‘Me Too’ attitude on software among channels will change and the time would come when channels are fighting on the quality front.

    DTH is also slated to change the terrestrial, cable and satellite home divide and we would be talking of integrated homes. The scenario looks challenging, with the entire process of buying and selling set to change.

    Mentioning the current issues are top of her agenda, Chhabra says, “My single point agenda for my channel is to ensure leadership for DD in all markets that we are operating. Also, we are working to retain terrestrial share and increase the share of revenues and audiences in cable & satellite homes.”

    “The objective is also to ensure that DD is constantly innovating to provide good wholesome software to the viewers and to build the channel bouquet on the national band in all categories. We have already been able to increase the average prime band rate and we are in the process of consolidation of rates across time categories.”

    On India, Chhabra says, “I keep telling my children that the best opportunities lie here in India, if you work hard and make the most of your abilities, India is the place to be. India’s absolutely challenging dynamics, its diversity, in terms of the people, language, culture is so fascinating and enervating. The media in India is looking at making the world its platform and making its presence felt almost in every corner of the world.”

    A firm believer of ‘Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with all your heart…’, Chhabra looks to experience life but wants the experiences to have meaning beyond the mere event. The greatest symbol of being different in this business is pursuing excellence with integrity. The right blend of old world charm and modernity, Vijayalaxmi Chhabra is a remarkable example of how hard work, honesty and determination can provide the basis for a successful individual.

     

     

    Stress Buster: Had I not been a broadcaster, I would have been a painter. It’s a stress buster. I paint in my leisure time. And, watching old classics is a passion. I also read a lot and love history. I am also a serious theatre and movie buff. I also manage to take time out and conduct internal training sessions on media, marketing and advertising, which I feel is my small way to give back to the industry some of the experience garnered over the years.

    Formula for success: Think big and yes, only dreaming big will not help, it has to be supported with intense hard work in a properly defined direction. I also feel in this ‘Rush Hour’ where everyone is totally isolated within himself, you must develop the ability to ‘listen’ to people, it gives you great insights because organisations are all about people.

  • Aamir Vs Aamir

    Aamir Vs Aamir

    Let me begin with a disclaimer. This is not a piece about how celebrities should conduct themselves in public or in media. It is not about whether or not they should get involved with or voice their opinions on politically or socially sensitive matters. It is not about whether they should do research on a controversial subject, acquaint themselves with ‘facts’ from both sides, and only then form an opinion instead of forming lazy opinions.

    Enough and more has been written or spoken on these subjects. We have heard Aamir and his supporters from the ‘industry’ and elsewhere. We have seen other celebrities such as Arundhati Roy and Rahul Bose share their opinion with us on several news TV stations. In fact, only recently, I read a beautifully written piece by Rahul Bose on intentblog, one of the best open blogs I have seen.

    It’s Aamir the actor who acts for a living versus Aamir the brand whose equity must be protected, grown and leveraged
    _____****_____

    My goal here is a little different. A little less selfless and more commercial, if you may. As a practitioner of marketing and communication, I am intrigued by the issues the Aamir-Narmada-Fanaa episode raises, even after the episode itself seems to have blown over.

    If you try to simplify an otherwise multi-textural issue, it’s Aamir the celebrity that endorses half a dozen high profile brands versus Aamir the concerned citizen who is compelled to raise his voice against seeming injustice. In fact, even more importantly, it’s Aamir the actor who acts for a living versus Aamir the brand whose equity must be protected, grown and leveraged.

    Now look at what the brand did. It [doesn’t sound right to refer to Aamir, as ‘it’, does it?] jumped out of its popularly accepted, rather linear domain of acting-to-entertain, into uncharted territory. Out of the larger-than-life fantasy world of the big screen, Dolby sound, and carefully directed retakes, into the grimy and sweaty world that millions live in every day. It could not have been an easy choice. Particularly when a brand extension [Fanaa] was weeks away from its launch. I know there are people out there who believe Aamir’s Narmada outburst and rather ‘suddenly’ found social conscience were part of a carefully orchestrated bridge strategy between Rang De Basanti and Fanaa. If that is true, I wonder how many product or service marketing managers would take such a risk before a launch. In fact, whether Aamir’s Narmada voice was a marketing tactic is not the real issue here.

    To me, the issue is whether brands need to learn a new lesson on how to communicate with their customers. Ever since brand management started as a discipline, most brands have tried to create and maintain a squeaky clean image, polished regularly by advertising. They have lived in a fantasy world where problems always disappear at the end of 30 seconds, ‘ordinary’ names always fail, rivals draw blood on an imaginary street. They have stood on pedestals and delivered sermons about the good and the evil, while obedient disciples listened with patience. Not unlike how Aamir and others in his profession talk to us in a theatre, if you think about it.

    But the truth is, brands live in our minds and hearts and we live in a society. The society isn’t a fantasy world; it’s where we return when the three hours of fantasy are over. It’s where parents take interviews, so that kids can get admission into a school, where neighbors fight over relatively trivial issues, where corruption is something we practice in day time and watch on TV at night.

    Do brands live in our society? With us? Should they?

    If we want to move from an era where consumers move from just knowing our brand to liking it, a thought that is finding increasing acceptance amongst seasoned brand marketers, we should perhaps think of brands as social beings.

    Should brands take a social stance? Or should they avoid any kind of controversy and stay sanitized and clean?
    _____****_____

    Not everyone in our society is our friend. Some people whose ideas and opinions are similar to ours, who have interests and hobbies common to ours, who help us face a challenge or leverage an opportunity, become our friends. Others become someone else’s friends. People fight normal fights, but we are most often loyal to our friends regardless of who is fighting against them. And while we might have many types of friends and sometimes we lose touch with some of them, we don’t change with friends very frequently.

    Do we see our brand as a friend like this?

    Here comes the provocation. In a world where people [consumers?] are getting increasingly cynical of marketing, advertising and brands, should we start breaking down some of the practices that built our powerful brands yesterday? Should we attempt to make the simple principles of friendship and social relationship work to create a relationship between our brand and attention challenged consumers?

    Should our brands step down from the hallowed pedestal and mingle with the masses? Should they take stances on issues of social importance and urgency, even if some of them might be controversial and ‘politically’ sensitive?

    Net, should brands take a social stance? Or should they avoid any kind of controversy and stay sanitized and clean?

    How come Aamir thought of doing something that Shah Rukh, Amitabh, Aishwarya, Lataji and Hritik haven’t done? Is Aamir the only one? How about Shabana? How about Gere?

    How come we regard Benetton, Bullet, MTV, Diesel, Harley, Zippo, Apple, Red Bull differently from countless others?

    If we think of brands broadly as mainstream and leading-edge, how they have built themselves, what chances they have taken, who owns them and how they behave, we might find some directions and explanations. But, then, that’s a broader subject, isn’t it?

    Do you have an opinion on brands taking a social stance. Help Ravi Kiran write the next chapter. Post your thoughts to editor@indiantelevision.com

    (The author is South Asia CEO Starcom MediaVest Group)

  • Hathway ready for the digital big fight

    Chief executive K Jayaraman is setting the tone for Hathway Cable & Datacom‘s duel in the digital era.Part of his aggressive ploy is to expand the network in newer markets through alliances with cable operators. His proposal to them: Hathway will invest and build the digital and broadband side of the business while allowing cable operators to retain earnings from their analogue operations and carriage fees.

    Jayaraman believes this will carry appeal to cable operators who do not have the financial resources to fight off competition from digital delivery platforms like direct-to-home (DTH). He is setting up a team to map out the growth potential in non Hathway areas.

    Jayaraman is also taking the acquisition route to widen Hathway‘s footprint. Local cable networks in Chandigarh, Mohali and Kanpur were gobbled up early this year to gain foothold in new territories, all northern prosperous markets where digital cable and broadband have potential to take off.

    Such buyouts, though, will be selective and limited. But coming after years of inaction, Hathway sees an opportunity in growing along with the digital market. “Competition from DTH is good as it will change the way cable TV has been functioning and open up the digital market. If cable TV can respond positively, it will increase our ARPU‘s (average revenue per user) and correct our business models,” says Jayaraman.

    Competition also means that Hathway will have to protect its own turf as DTH gets aggressive with full content and more service providers. With Tata Sky preparing for launch soon and Subhash Chandra‘s Dish TV recently sewing a deal with SET-Discovery for a whole host of channels including Sony TV, Max, Discovery and Ten Sports, the writing is on the wall: cable will have to move in fast to migrate its customers from analogue to digital.

    Jayaraman‘s initial task is to defend Hathway‘s direct points and the creamy customers of the local cable operators. “We will have to persuade our direct customers and the top-end subscribers of our local cable operators to opt for digital cable as they will form the main target for DTH service providers,” he says.

    So far, that has been an agonisingly slow process. Hathway has managed to deploy just under 50,000 digital set-top boxes (STBs), mainly in its direct points. The distribution chain has not been supportive and, as Jayaraman says, only one-fifth of the last mile operators (LMOs) have been co-operative.

    Hathway Cable & Datacom chief executive K Jayaraman

    For energising the chain, Hathway is giving operators Rs 400 per digital STB. And on niche content, the multi-system operator (MSO) parts with a 50 per cent share on margins. Besides, operators who buy STBs on bulk are given discounts. “At the retail level, the LMOs will have to figure out what they want. It is in their interest to protect their networks,” says Jayaraman.

    But how does Hathway woo customers and make them switch from analogue to digital? One way is to offer bundled packages along with the cable internet services. The idea is to lock in customers with ARPUs over a longer period while driving sales of digital STBs.

    There are various schemes launched over a month-long period. Internet subscribers who have been sitting with Hathway for two years will be given the digital box free to use for a year. They will also have the option to buy the box for Rs 500 (box costs Rs 3375) but have to remain as Hathway‘s internet customer for the whole year.

    Boxes are available at Rs 1,000 for one-year-old customers. And for an existing internet subscriber who has not completed a year, the box is sold at Rs 2750 while Globus (retail store) coupon of Rs 500 is given along with a 20 per cent discount on Onkyo Home Theatres. New internet customers who subscribe to a minimum period of six months will have the option to buy the box for Rs 1000.

    “We have started all these initiatives for the last one month. We are rewarding our customers for their loyalty while locking them for a longer period. We feel bundling will help as DTH can‘t ptovide such services. We are in a unique position compared to the other MSOs as we have a substantial broadband subscriber base,” says Jayaraman.

    Hathway is backing up the price incentives with a dose of marketing, unprecedented in the Indian cable TV industry. Discount coupons, roadshows, FM radio stations, hoardings, interactive contests – all these media vehicles are being used to promote digital cable. And it has a staff of 70 people on sales and customer support for the digital services. “Our monthly ad spend is Rs 800000-100000. We are now selling 5,000 boxes a month which is still low, but there has been an improvement in offtake,” says Jayaraman.

    Tieing up with companies for discounts and co-branding is another exercise Hathway has started. “We are going to tie up with Citibank for a co-branded credit card which we will offer to our internet customers. For our digital cable, we are in talks with Onida for discount offers,” says Jayaraman.

    Lining up premium content is not a focus area. Hathway, though, has launched an ad-free dial-up interactive music channel I-TV through its digital services. The channel, which is currently available in Mumbai and Pune, will also be taken to other cities. Hathway has also introduced gaming on its digital services last month, for which it has selected NDS technology.

    Expanding the digital services to new cities is also part of Jayaraman‘s plans. After launching in Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, Hyderabad and Pune, Punjab will be the next stop.

    Hathway is creating another arsenal for its fight against DTH. Plans are on to launch VoIP (voice over internet protocol) services by the end of the fiscal. Having built a two-way infrastructure for broadband, this is a natural progression for the MSO. “We had tested for analogue telephony with Bharti but feel VoIP is a better route for us. VoIP test is going on in Mumbai. We plan to launch at least in two cities this fiscal. We can bundle cable TV, broadband and VoIP services to customers which will add to our revenue streams,” says Jayaraman.

    As the digital platforms gather force, nobody knows who will win the big fight. But, as Jayaraman says, cable will have to develop a well-rounded revenue stream if it has to survive the race.

  • Lodestar national media director Nandini Dias

    Lodestar national media director Nandini Dias

    Think Emvies and pop comes Lodestar to your mind and with that comes the image of Nandini Dias. At the helm of the agency since its inception, Nandini and her team have consistently performed at the Emvies year after year. So much so that at this year’s presentations and shortlisting process for the awards, every agency took a dig at Lodestar and Nandini couldn’t stop laughing.

    One of her peers from a rival agency introduced himself to the jury as Mr So-and-So from Lodestar. “We really felt we had arrived in life,” she laughs. Such has been the stranglehold of Lodestar over the Emvies and the perfectionist that Nandini is, she is always determined to get it right every time… time after time.

    A science graduate, Nandini went on to do her Advertising & Marketing post-graduation from Xavier Institute of Communications (XIC). Around the same time she was selected into Jamnalal Bajaj Institute of Management, and faced with a choice, preferred to jump straight into the deep end and joined advertising. “At that point in time, I didn’t realize that ‘MBA-ness’ would go on to become such a critical label and preferred to get straight to the point with advertising and marketing at XIC,” she ponders, in retrospect.

    Though, most of what she has learnt about media, all the tricks of the trade, she avers, has been from hands-on work experience. Albeit with some trial and error.

    Today, as vice president of Lodestar, she is a force to reckon with and many clients agree to come on board only if Nandini personally oversees their account. That in itself speaks eons about the kind of commitment and passion she has for her work and the respect she has earned in the industry.

    With no mentor to guide her through her media odyssey, Nandini learnt to tune the strings herself. After XIC, she joined a small agency called Interpublicity (run by Nargis Wadia) and was with them for one and a half years. “I joined them in 1988 and in those days Interpublicity used to be a very creatively inclined agency. Interpublicity had virtually no media department and Mrs Wadia used to keep telling me that I had a very business like mind and that I should actually be on the servicing side of the business. At that time the media stream of the business was really unheralded and the one of the most powerful media departments was housed in the then Lintas, so I decided to join them. While I already had a year and a half of experience, I really didn’t mind learning everything from scratch all over again. ” she says.

    The Lintas of those days was structured as autonomous groups like Bombay 1, Bombay 2, Bombay 3 and so on, each functioning as a mini agency within an agency. Nandini used to look after the clients that fell under the Bombay 3 division of Lintas. In her five-year stint at Lintas, she handled clients like Cadburys, Johnson & Johnson, Walls (from Unilever) and Marico amongst others.

    Interestingly enough, her quest for a mentor ended with herself. “Thrown into the deep end, I realized that there is only so much that someone can really ‘teach’ you. Beyond that, I realized, that the only way to learn was to learn by yourself,” she recalls.

    Inadvertently out on her own, she had to sink or swim. And swim she did, by constantly absorbing information and digesting the wealth of knowledge that she found all around her. From basic sources like books, papers, journals and thesis to the more interactive periods she had with colleagues, peers who were always around when she was faced with a problem. “I just learned it all by myself and figured out the method to the madness,” says she.

    In 1994 Nandini had a winged visitor. The stork came calling and the birth of her first son led to her taking her first break from advertising. “I was in this holiday pregnancy spirit and since it was my first child, I didn’t want to leave the baby to anyone in the early months. After my baby was born, I was debating whether to take a break and then go back to work. Also the fact was that since I had already taken a six month maternity leave, someone else had been servicing my accounts at Lintas. So I thought it would be better to join another organisation. My first child was born on 1 January 1994, and in November the same year, I joined FCB Ulka as media supervisor,” says Nandini.

    From media supervisor to vice president, it’s been a long 11 years for Nandini at FCB Ulka and its media independent Lodestar. “Four months after joining the agency I was pleasantly surprised to be promoted to group manager,” she says. And since then she’s been going from strength to strength in the organisation.

    For about three years after 1996, Nandini was handling the entire media planning business of FCB under Kalpana Rao while Apurva Purohit was handling the media buying.

    But in 1998, the stork came a calling a second time and Nandini had a brief part time stint before being faced with her next big challenge. At that time FCB decided to re-launch its second agency Interface Communications in India and Nandini was part of the core start up team. The agency had already been launched earlier as far back as 1985.

    “For three years I had been doing the same thing and this came as a challenge to me at a time when I was thinking about what my next move should be. I thought that running a start up would be easier than running a large organisation. But the reality was totally different. You have to invest so much time to in clients, people, processes and infrastructure apart from putting systems in place to just get the organisation running. The biggest challenge was to get people to join us since most of them want to join large, known organisations as media is very strongly driven by buying power and industry clout. Another thing was also that we were fighting with the biggies and that was a far tougher job,” she says.

    “We started from scratch and really struggled to get the organisation up and running. Our aim was to separate it from the existing organisation and give this agency its own identity,” she adds.

    Setting up a new agency is no cakewalk since media is all about clout and about the amount of money being put down on the table. “We were very keen on starting it as a separate organisation. That was a tall task for anyone. I think it was a big high for me to get business on the basis of what I would bring to the table. It was a big responsibility and I was initially very awed when clients began coming on board citing my leadership as one of the reasons,” she narrates.

    Four years after Interface Communications was launched, the management decided to bring Lodestar – the brand – to the forefront. And Lodestar became an independent identity. “While there are different divisions and groups under Lodestar to start with, they eventually got integrated,” Nandini informs.

    Lodestar came into being around 95-96 but at that point in time it was only a buying and implementation operation. The strategic area was a part of the mainline agency. “It was not a separate media house per se but for the last three – four years, we’ve been running Lodestar as an independent media house,” she says.

    How did the transition come about? “It had a lot to do with market forces and also the fact that there were many clients who not aligned to any creative agencies. So there were a lot of AOR clients, which came in. Now, 50 per cent of our clients are pure AOR clients. It made sense to run it as an independent organisation,” says Nandini.

    One immediate challenge was that FCB’s global media arm didn’t have any multinational clients that fall into Lodestar India’s lap merely on the strength of international alignments. Unlike, the P&Gs, Pepsis and Unilevers of the world, Lodestar had to brave it on their own and pitch for MNCs in India which were aligned to rival agencies internationally. L’oreal is one such example.

    The team at Lodestar found an approachable leader and a hard taskmaster in Nandini. Her office is a free walkway for anyone who is facing a problem. Being a perfectionist to the T, she has very high expectations from her team and trained them to be perfectionists as well. Lodestar’s performance at the Emvies during her tenure at the top is a testimony to the commitment her team has towards clients. “We may be much smaller but our consistent track record at the Emvies over the last few years has been extremely satisfying. The businesses we handle, the quality of output we deliver and also the team we have all put us ahead of a lot of the competition,” she proudly states.

    One of her peers in Group M once said to her, “The best people in the industry are trained under you. So you continue training them and after a couple of years, we will poach them.” To which her reply was, “The more people you pick up, the more I will train. So let’s see who wins the battle – whether you hire more or I train more.”

    Lodestar has, over a period of time, become a starting point and a destination for a lot of people who want to do quality work. “As an organisation, we give a lot of importance to the quality of thinking rather than just mindless buying,” she says.

    Being a perfectionist, she finds it difficult to accept people who work in a particular place just to earn good money. “Of course money is important but if I don’t find enough involvement and commitment in people, both of us have to work at it that much harder. We try to work with such people and get the entire team on to a common ground. And once you’re alongside them, then it’s very difficult for them not to see things the same way,” says she.

    It’s not a much publicized fact that Nandini has been very active in sports during her school and college days. She played badminton at the state level and has won many awards too. Today, she compares herself to a sports trainer… albeit in the media field. Drawing comparison she says, “I push people to work hard just like a sports trainer keeps pushing you. But ultimately, the rewards are yours to keep.”

    Her contribution to the industry has been huge in terms of quality of work, research, innovations, tools, etc that the agency churns out year after year, which in turn sets benchmarks for the rest.

    One personal grouse of hers is that a lot of new people coming into the industry are irrationally ambitious. Little do they realize that seniority is not achieved via job hopping and getting designation hikes. “Personally it is a big high for me that I joined FCB Ulka as media supervisor and have reached to where I am today in the same organisation,” she says.

    Strengths
    I will be hard on myself till I know that something is done to the best of anyone’s ability. If I decide to do something, I will do whatever that needs to get done, which is obviously not underhand, to do it. Building relationships with people is my strength. All my clients today are my friends.

    Eleven years is a long time to stay put in an organisation, especially when rampant poaching of professionals goes on in the ever so competitive media environment… but Nandini has no regrets whatsoever. “There have been opportunities and some of them were tempting. But I’m a person with very basic wants and I’m not into exorbitant living. I work for people and principles and I should like what I’m doing. I have been involved with it for so many years, constantly nurturing it that I’m in no hurry to abandon it. I have been one of the most consistent faces leading Lodestar and you can blame anything good or bad that has happened in the agency to me,” she chuckles.

    She however adds, “Unless something really challenging comes my way, I will stay put. Apart from that, my desire is to really grow Lodestar so why would I hop jobs.”

    Shashi Sinha once told her, “Nandini, if you have set your mind on something, you will achieve it irrespectively. I can see the kind of determination in you that will not let you stop till the job is done.”

    This also rings true for her husband Agnello Dias (JWT senior vice president and executive creative director), points out Nandini.

    Weakness
    I will call a spade a spade, which is a very tough one. I’m not a ‘Yes Boss’ person. And this trait of mine has put me in a tight spot all the time. But I can’t change myself. And that makes it tougher for me because if you’re not a person who toes the line, to prove yourself you have to work that much harder. I get too involved into people.

    Passionate about sports, if Nandini was not doing what she is doing today, she would go back to sports and strive to do something for the players for whom sport is bread and butter. “Unfortunately, there isn’t much money in sports except for cricket and those people who are into other games have pursued it at the cost of their education. Hence they find it difficult to get jobs. For me the alternative job would be sports marketing, sports advertising and growing the industry keeping players’ interests in mind,” she dwells.

    How does she juggle between home and the ever-pressing demands at work. “It is tough to manage home and professional life. It’s a conscious effort to balance out the two and it can only happen if you are determined to do it. I teach my two sons myself. I teach kids at office so why can’t I do it at home?” she chuckles.

    While earlier she was a total workaholic, since the last three years she has been taking her regular one month of privilege leave. “Prior to that, there always used to be something that was important enough so that I couldn’t take off. Now I am making a conscious effort to take time out,” she emphasises.

    Being a true blue nature’s person, Nandini loves trekking and camping and her favourite getaways are the Himalayas, Ganges and Beas.

     

  • Broadcast Bill still has minefields to clear before becoming law

    Broadcast Bill still has minefields to clear before becoming law

    So the government again renews its long-in-the-trying attempt to get broadcast regulation in place. Is it just us or is this feeling of déj? vu that it may be another exercise in futility shared by the industry as well?

    Still, that doesn’t take away the importance of having a comprehensive legislation for the sector that is estimated to be worth Rs 427 billion in 2010 according to the PricewaterhouseCoopers report presented at this year’s Ficci Frames convention.

    The Broadcasting Bill has been dangling on an uncertain thread for close to a decade now. Several information and broadcasting (I&B) ministers in several governments, who have tried to maneuver it past the corridors of the houses of Parliament and into law, have come and gone. All have failed; none have had the drive to push it through. It has proved to be an untouchable piece of legislation; a hot potato that is dropped every time an effort is made.

    The Bill tries to address the issue of encouraging domestic originating content on TV channels by mandating a 15 per cent share for it.
    _____****_____

    Another attempt is being made to enact the covered-with-dust Bill. A draft has been prepared for the Union Cabinet’s persual and initial indications are that it is going to impact almost everyone in the broadcasting food chain. It is slated to be introduced in Parliament during the Monsoon session by not-even-a-year-in-the-seat I&B minister Priya Ranjan Dasmunsi.

    I&B ministry secretary SK Arora has been working for a long time on putting together the document. Help has been sought from several quarters while drafting the Bill: the US FCC, Casbaa in Hong Kong, other consultants, consumer groups and interested parties.

    The Bill tries to address the issue of encouraging domestic originating content on TV channels by mandating a 15 per cent share for it. Then it caps cross media ownership at 20 per cent, and even share of voice for a TV channel or cable TV network nationally at 15 per cent. A Broadcasting Regulatory Authority of India (Brai) is to be set up (have we not heard this one before?), which will monitor the content on TV channels and oversee the broadcast industry in all its aspects the same way as the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India does in the telecom sector.

    No broadcaster or cable TV operator is going to cede power and control they have acquired over the years they have been operating in India.
    _____****_____

    The first piece of legislation is more than welcome and should in the medium to long term give a boost to local TV production and more so animation. Of course, it goes without saying that it is in the interest of local broadcasters to create local content that appeals to audiences and there’s no running away from it if they are seeking to make money out of the market. That they have so largely shied away from doing so, may be part of their business plan. There will be some bickering about this by some of the players.

    Of course, the government will have to specify whether the 15 per cent content cap relates to fresh domestic prime time content or to recycled content. Remember some broadcasters might buy garbage worthy shows dirt cheap and put them on air late at night in order to fulfil the legislative norms.

    Additionally, a transition period will have to be specified so that the domestic production industry gears up to deliver the quality animation and programming that is demanded internationally, so that international broadcasters can – if they want – buy worldwide rights.

    On the whole, over time the 15 per cent imposition could well catapult TV documentary makers and animation studios into the next level. Though some argue that the cap should be higher, it is a good start.

    That is just the soft part of the Bill though. Trying to control share of voice and restricting cross media ownership are two clauses that are arguably going to get the entire Bill stuck in a quagmire; lot of it political. Reason: hectic lobbying is going to commence to do away with them. It is these clauses which in the past have prevented the Bill from becoming a law. And, it is quite likely to do the same once again.

    No broadcaster or cable TV operator is going to cede power and control they have acquired over the years they have been operating in India. Many of their business models are based on this power.

    The setting up of Brai is another moot point. It’s about time a content watchdog was set up. The other option is that the industry kowtows to a xenophobic government’s every content concern and censorship demand.

    Additionally, the draft Bill fails to clearly address broadcasting in a converged era to hand held devices and mobile phones.

    A key question everyone is asking: will the Bill go through this time? It looks unlikely to have an easy ride and, in all probability, will be knocked into another shape and form. Or, it may end up being still born. Its passage will depend on how much pressure the I&B mandarins — and the Congress-led coalition government — are willing to withstand not only from the Opposition, but also allies, some of whose sympathisers have big media dreams in East and South India.