Category: High Court

  • Kalanithi Maran responds to court summons on SpiceJet tax evasion case

    Kalanithi Maran responds to court summons on SpiceJet tax evasion case

    NEW DELHI: In response to summons issued by a Delhi court in cases of tax evasion related to SpiceJet, of which Sun Group chairman Kalanithi Maran is non-executive chairman, the media owner embroiled in several controversies, has said that him and his company are not “tax dodgers.”

     

    Denying that any company in the Sun Group is in arrears in payment of taxes, Maran said that “there have been several occasions when tax authorities have awarded trophies and honoured Sun TV Network with citations for exemplary compliance and for topping the region in terms of highest tax payments.”

     

    “The companies of the Sun Group collectively and me in my personal capacity pay more than Rs 600 crore as taxes annually to the national exchequer,” he added.

     

    Referring to the media reports regarding SpiceJet, Maran said, “I am confident that the Honorable Courts will render justice to us.”

     

    “Given that the Sun group companies and I have been the topic of several malicious and misleading stories fed to the print media by certain people, it appears that this action too may have been motivated by ulterior motives to tarnish the image and reputation of the Sun Group and me,” he added. 

  • Madras HC permits Sun Group’s Suryan FM to participate in auction

    Madras HC permits Sun Group’s Suryan FM to participate in auction

    MUMBAI: Following the Delhi High Court’s interim order, which permitted Red FM to attend mock auctions for Phase III, a directive has been issued by the Madras High Court, allowing Suryan FM to participate in the actual FM auctions.

     

    With this, Sun Group’s Kal Radio, which runs Suryan FM, will now participate in the auctions. Sun Group earlier challenged the Union Ministry’s decision of not giving the company security clearance, due to which the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry failed to include Sun Group in the pre-bidders list for the Phase III auctions process.

     

    No official statement was issued at the time of filing this report, as the Network is awaiting the hard copy from High Court. Justice M Sathyanarayanan passed the order on the petition filed by the company.

     

    A few days ago, the networks – Digital Radio Broadcasting and Kal Radio, approached the Delhi and Madras High Courts seeking judicial directive on the Ministry’s decision to keep them away from the auctions.

     

    Mock auctions for Phase III are scheduled to take place on 22 and 23 July, 2015, while the actual auction will begin from 27 July, 2015.

     

    P S Raman, senior counsel had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. He pointed out that Dayanidhi Maran is not a shareholder in any of these companies, and that he is under serious charges, and not the company or its subsidiaries. The reason for denial by the Ministry was in line with allegations of Dayanidhi Maran’s holding in the companies. Raman also argued that restriction is against the fundamental rights of freedom of expression.

     

    He also stated that there is no clause in the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, where there is a mention of security clearance.

     

    The Sun Group counsel also pointed out that Reliance’s Big FM was permitted to take part in the auctions even though the network was under serious charges as well.

     

    On the other hand, Additional Solicitor General G Rajagopalan pointed fingers at the group’s promoters facing serious economic offences. According to the Centre, it will not go down well with the people of the country, if the network was permitted to participate in bidding of licenses.

     

    Meanwhile, the final verdict from the Delhi High Court is expected to be revealed on 24 July.

  • Verdict on interim plea strengthens belief in judicial system: Red FM

    Verdict on interim plea strengthens belief in judicial system: Red FM

    NEW DELHI: Red FM said today that the directive of the Delhi High Court to allow it to participate in mock auctions for FM Radio Phase III has strengthened the company’s belief in the judicial system.

     

    The company also said that it was happy that the court had taken cognizance of its pleas to allow it to participate in the mock auctions.

     

    In a brief statement, Red FM said, “We have always maintained that our business is a professionally managed entity and it’s unfair to penalize a well-run, successful business and its employees. We also strongly believe that not allowing us to participate the phase III auctions is an attack on media freedom.”

     

    As was earlier reported by Indiantelevision.com, the Court fixed the next date of hearing for 24 July while giving the interim order today.

     

    While the mock auctions are being held on 22 and 23 July, the main e-auction begins from 27 July for the first batch.

  • Red FM to participate in mock auctions; Delhi HC to hear case on 24 July

    Red FM to participate in mock auctions; Delhi HC to hear case on 24 July

    NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has allowed Red FM owned by Digital Radio Broadcasting Ltd, which is part of the Sun Group, to take part in mock auctions for the third phase of FM auctions to be held on 22 and 23 July.

     

    Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva issued notice to the Government and said it would hear the matter on 24 July.

     

    The order came after Government counsel Sanjeev Narula told the Court that it was not possible for the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry to postpone the main FM auctions. He said the entire process had been lined and any postponement will have a cascading effect.

     

    The Court had yesterday (21 July) asked the Centre to consider deferring the auctions as it heard a plea by Digital Radio Broadcasting against the government’s decision.

     

    Meanwhile, the Madras High Court said it would announce its orders on 23 July. The court had reserved its orders after prolonged hearing yesterday and had initially said that the orders would be pronounced today (22 July).

     

    Red FM is among the prime bidders in the phase III of FM auctions covering 135 radio channels in 69 cities.

     

    The Ministry had last week issued a list of 21 bidders, which did not include the Sun Group’s Red FM, and then sent a formal communication to the Group on 15 July that it had been denied permission.

     

    The Court has been asked to direct the Centre to permit Sun Group to migrate to the Phase-III regime by allowing it to resubmit the application dated 20 March, 2015 to participate in the auction.

     

    The petitions also said the company was not involved in any dispute with the nation’s security, nor had it broadcast anything that affected the security of the nation.

     

    The petition alleges that the order denying permission had been issued “carelessly, with total non-application of mind and in a cavalier fashion, totally unmindful of its consequences and repercussions not only on Sun TV but also on the entire broadcasting and media industry.”

     

    Apart from the denial to participate in Phase III FM auctions, the order also implied that the sister companies of the Sun Group would be compelled to close down FM radio stations, totalling 45 across the nation, the petitioners said.

     

    “Non-inclusion of the company’s name on the list is nothing but closing the entire FM stations run by it for extraneous, illegal and mala fide reasons,” the petitions said.

     

    It has pointed out that the Indian Telegraph Act does not make any mention of security clearance, and licence can be terminated or denied only if there is violation of the terms of the agreement including any defaults in payment.

     

    Clause 2.2(b) of the Information Memorandum and Clause 3.2(b) of the Notice Inviting Application says only a company controlled by a person convicted for an offence involving moral turpitude or money laundering or drug trafficking or terrorist activities or is declared as insolvent will not be eligible to apply. The petitioners said there was nothing in the rules to deny permission to the Sun Group, which is controlled by the Maran brothers. 

  • Sun Group challenges denial of permission to bid for FM Phase III auctions in Chennai & Delhi High Courts

    Sun Group challenges denial of permission to bid for FM Phase III auctions in Chennai & Delhi High Courts

    NEW DELHI: The Sun Group’s challenge to denial of permission to participate in auction for Phase-III of FM radio broadcasting licences is expected to be heard both by the Madras and Delhi High Courts on 21 July, 2015. 

     

    The Group, in the petitions filed today (20 July), has also sought a stay on the order of the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry in this regard. The Ministry had last week issued a list of 21 bidders, which did not include the Group’s Red FM, and then sent a formal communication to the Group on 15 July that it had been denied permission. 

     

    The Court has been asked to direct the Centre to permit Sun Group to migrate to the Phase-III regime by allowing it to resubmit the application dated 20 March, 2015 to participate in the auction.

     

    When asked how case on a similar issue could be filed simultaneously in two High Courts, a spokesperson of Sun Group said the petitions have been filed by different companies which are part of the Group.

     

    A set of six writ petitions, which include three each by the company and the shareholders, has sought permission to resubmit its application to participate in the tender.

     

    The petitions also said the company was not involved in any dispute with the nation’s security, nor had it broadcast anything that affected the security of the nation.

     

    The petition alleges that the order denying permission had been issued “carelessly, with total non-application of mind and in a cavalier fashion, totally unmindful of its consequences and repercussions not only on Sun TV but also on the entire broadcasting and media industry.”

     

    Apart from the denial to participate in Phase III FM auctions, the order also implied that the sister companies of the Sun Group would be compelled to close down FM radio stations, totalling 45 across the nation, the petitioners said.

     

    “Non-inclusion of the company’s name on the list is nothing but closing the entire FM stations run by it for extraneous, illegal and mala fide reasons,” the petitions said.

     

    It has pointed out that the Indian Telegraph Act does not make any mention of security clearance, and licence can be terminated or denied only if there is violation of the terms of the agreement including any defaults in payment.

     

    Clause 2.2(b) of the Information Memorandum and Clause 3.2(b) of the Notice Inviting Application says only a company controlled by a person convicted for an offence involving moral turpitude or money laundering or drug trafficking or terrorist activities or is declared as insolvent will not be eligible to apply. The petitioners said there was nothing in the rules to deny permission the the Sun Group, which is controlled by the Maran brothers.

     

    Some financial cases – with no relation to the nation’s security – are pending against the two brothers but nothing has been proved, a Sun Group spokesperson told Indiantelevision.com.

  • Madras HC dismisses Marans’ plea; I&B asks MHA to clarify on security nod denial

    Madras HC dismisses Marans’ plea; I&B asks MHA to clarify on security nod denial

    NEW DELHI: The Madras High Court has dismissed petitions by Sun TV and Kal Comm Pvt. Ltd. seeking stay on the attachment of its assets by Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with Aircel-Maxis case.

     

    Justice M. Sathyanarayanan said the Supreme Court was monitoring the case and the High Court was not inclined to entertain the petitions.

     

    Meanwhile, it is learnt that in reply to a letter from the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry seeking clarifications on rejection of security clearance to Sun TV, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has reiterated its position. The I&B Ministry is understood to have highlighted the issue relating to freedom of the media.

     

    That apart, the I&B Ministry may be writing again, pointing to the Madras High Court order of September last year, which had commented strongly against the Ministry for cancelling the multi system operator (MSO) license to Sun TV Network’s subsidiary Kal Cables. The observation had come in a case relating to denial of security clearance as the Maran brothers were facing criminal cases.

     

    As was reported earlier by Indiantelevision.com, the refusal to grant a license could result in the closure of 33 channels of the group, FM channels and print outlets.

     

    During the hearing of the case today, the senior counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the properties were acquired much before the investigating agencies commenced their probe into the Aircel-Maxis case and questioned why properties of other firms accused in the case have not been attached.

     

    Additional Solicitor General G. Rajagopalan contended that the Supreme Court was monitoring the developments in the case and had also observed that any other court hearing the matter would impede the investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the ED.

     

    Following the attachment of two of its properties by the ED on 31 March, Sun TV and Kal Comm Pvt. Ltd. moved the Madras High Court seeking to quash the order. The ED had earlier questioned the maintainability of the petitions in view of the Supreme Court’s directions in the case.

     

    The Supreme Court in a blanket order of 10 February, 2011 and 11 April, 2011 restricted any court from entertaining petitions in the matter. 

  • Bombay High Court suspends Salman Khan’s five-year sentence

    Bombay High Court suspends Salman Khan’s five-year sentence

    NEW DELHI: A large number of filmmakers in Mumbai heaved a sigh of relief when the Bombay High Court stayed the five-year sentence imposed on actor Salman Khan by a Sessions court two days earlier for killing a homeless man in a 2002 hit-and-run case.

     

    The 49-year old actor was however asked by the High Court to re-apply for fresh bail before the Sessions Court.

     

    Khan had managed to get a two-day reprieve on 6 May itself on the ground that the judgment had not been made available to him.   

     

    High Court judge A M Thipsay suspended Khan’s sentence after an initial hearing on his appeal at which the superstar’s lawyers argued that the trial court had not considered all the evidence on hand during the trial.

     

    Had he gone to jail, Bollywood sources said around six films would have been affected as they are already in the pipeline and have an investment of more than Rs 200 crore. 

     

    The dead man, 38-year-old Noor Ullah Khan, was among five people who were run over in the incident. Late on the night of 28 September, 2002, Khan’s Toyota Land Cruiser hit the American Express bakery in the Bandra area of Mumbai.

     

    Khan was arrested on 28 September, 2002, and released the same day. He was charged under Section 304 (2) with culpable homicide not amounting to murder, a charge that was struck down by the Bombay High Court in 2003. This Bombay High Court order was set aside by the Supreme Court in 2003, paving the way for the case to being re-examined.

     

    Khan had sought to say his driver was behind the wheel, but Sessions Judge DW Deshpande said the actor was driving the car and was under the influence of alcohol at the time. 

     

    One of Bollywood’s busiest stars having appeared in more than 80 Hindi-language films, Khan’s jail sentence is bound to affect the film projects he was working in.

     

    Known for turning out at least one hit every year, Khan’s films like Dabangg, Ready, Bodyguard, Ek Tha Tiger, Maine Pyar Kiya and Hum Aap Ke Hain Kaun have been huge commercial hits.

     

    The prosecution alleged that Khan had been driving the car while drunk, both of which charges the actor denied in court in March. But many witnesses disagreed.

     

    A constable attached to Khan’s security detail had said in a statement to the police that the “drunk” actor had lost control of the car. The policeman died in 2007 of tuberculosis.

  • TV Today Network approaches High Court for speedy decision on Oye FM

    TV Today Network approaches High Court for speedy decision on Oye FM

    MUMBAI: TV Today Network Ltd informed the BSE that it has approached the High Court with regards to the delay by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting’s (MIB) approval to sell the company’s FM radio business-Oye FM (seven radio stations) to Entertainment Network (India) Limited (ENIL).

     

    According to the note published on BSE, TV Today Network Ltd stated that the Board noted “that in relation to the proposed sale of seven radio stations to Entertainment Network (India) Limited, since time is of essence and with approval of the MIB getting delayed, hence in order to expedite the matter, an urgent writ petition in the High Court is listed for hearing, to seek necessary relief.”

     

    TV Today CEO Ashish Bagga, refused to comment on this decision taken by the company.

     

    The application was filed by the company to MIB on 16 February, 2015.

     

    Click here to read full report

  • Adcap case adjourned to 24 July; broadcasters hope govt will reverse earlier order

    Adcap case adjourned to 24 July; broadcasters hope govt will reverse earlier order

    NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has adjourned the petition by the News Broadcasters Association (NBA) and others challenging the advertising cap of 12 minutes per hour sought to be imposed by the government to 24 July.

     

    The NBA and regional broadcasters along with music channels informed the court about recent developments vis-?-vis the new government and highlighted the fact that they were awaiting the government’s response against their joint representation.

     

    The Court agreed to the adjournment in order to give some more time for the aggrieved broadcasters and government to represent and decide an amicable solution amongst themselves.

     

    The order that the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) will not take any action against any channel pending the petition will continue. In an earlier hearing, the Court had, at the regulator’s instance, directed that all channels keep a record of the advertisements run by them.

     

    TRAI sought to tell the Court that the matter had been pending for long, but the bench headed by Chief Justice G Rohini said if the matter could be resolved, then it was better to give more time.

     

    For the broadcasters, this is a major relief even Information and Broadcasting Minister Arun Jaitley recently voiced his views against an ad cap on broadcasters.

     

    The NBA had challenged the ad cap rule, contending that TRAI does not have jurisdiction to regulate commercial airtime on television channels.

     

    Apart from the NBA, the petition have been filed by Sarthak Entertainment, Pioneer Channel Factory, E24 Glamoru, Sun TV Network, TV Vision, B4U Broadband, 9X Media, Kalaignar, Celebrities Management, Eanadu Television and Raj Television.

     

    The news and regional broadcasters fear that the capping of commercial airtime will curtail their ad revenues. They also argue that the ad cap must be brought only after the benefits of cable TV digitisation start showing.

     

  • Shemaroo obtains John Doe order from HC to protect ‘Hunterrr’ from piracy

    Shemaroo obtains John Doe order from HC to protect ‘Hunterrr’ from piracy

    MUMBAI: Shemaroo Entertainment has obtained a John Doe order from the Mumbai High Court to protect its latest release Hunterrr from the menace of piracy. The order, not only restricts piracy on cable, digital and physical medium but action can also be taken against a person watching the film from an illegal source.

     

    Shemaroo Entertainment has sent a copy of the order to various MSOs, LCOs and ISPs. Further, the court has directed all police authorities to act on the order.

     

    The order restrains any person from “downloading from internet, telecasting, broadcasting and distributing or putting on the cable TV network, disseminating, reproducing or otherwise making available to the public, the film Hunterrr or “from (i) making a copy of the said film, (ii) to sell or give on hire, or offer for sale or hire, any copy of the said film (iii) to communicate the film to the public in any manner whatsoever including by way of but not limited to telecasting and/or re telecasting the said film, or even otherwise dealing with the rights in the said film which vest exclusively in the Plaintiff, in any manner whatsoever.” The order also restrains others “from communicating or making available or distributing, or duplicating, or displaying, or releasing, or showing, or uploading, or downloading or exhibiting, or playing, and/or defraying the movie Hunterrr in any manner from the Plaintiff or in any other manner, which would violate/infringe the Plaintiff’s copyright in the said film Hunterrr.”

     

    Hunterrr stars Gulshan Devaiah, Radhika Apte and Sai Tamhankar and is produced by Anurag Kashyap’s Phantom Films.

     

    A John Doe order is defined as an action instituted by a party who seeks the aid of the Court in fear of some future probable injury to his rights or interest and the action is brought to prevent a wrong that is apprehended.