Category: Laurence Boschetto

  • ‘The only thing that supercedes creativity is accountability’ : Laurence Boschetto

    ‘The only thing that supercedes creativity is accountability’ : Laurence Boschetto

    Taking into account the time factor, won’t this whole process detract from the primary goal of running the business?
    In today’s day and age the CMO has to learn everything, figure out how to navigate and perform at the same time. These things have made it important for us to multi-task and therefore within our organizations, 95 to 98 per cent of the people need to keep clients happy, help them keep businesses on their books and they need to attend to business as usual. The balance of us need to think strategic, while we still have client engagement and we still need to rally the troops, we need to sit down and develop the plan to understand how we are going to make it a fundamental reality. It’s a matter of how you’re going to carve it up and that is only going to be successful if the key stakeholders are aligned around the same goals and vision.

     

    Coming to your direct charge DraftFCB, a unique feature of this merger is that the media seems to be driving the creative while normally it works the other way round. It is significant that its DraftFCB and not FCB Draft. Does this type of organization exist anywhere else in the industry?
    That’s the newness of it, by which we are saying that the only thing that supersedes creativity is accountability. Art for art’s sake doesn’t exist in our business, it’s a part that drives results and it’s creativity that is measurable.

    Clients today want to know the inter relationship of branding to direct, to promotions, to retail, to guerilla marketing. We can show results in below the line disciplines but it’s now time for us to apply those same scientific tools to traditional advertising and branding. There are only one or two clients that have mastered the art because their businesses are single dimensional and they are more of a marketing company and not a distribution channel.

    Amex is a perfect example that can tell you the cause and effect relationship formalistically because it’s a single offering and something they have perfected over 50 years.

     
    We can show results in below the line disciplines but it’s now time for us to apply those same scientific tools to traditional advertising and branding
     

    One of the major stories since the merger of Draft and FCB is the Walmart win. What was the killer application that you offered to outdo the others?
    This was the first test drive and we were up against several major traditional global advertising agencies. In fact there were 26 agencies in the reckoning. We first took it out with a very short term vision by aiming to make it to the second round. However, we made it to the second, then the third and also to the fourth. Four major players made it to the finals including The Martin Agency, O&M and the (co)-incumbent agency GSD&M.

    The key application was that of data and how it can be the driving principle guide to your strategic plan in integrating the entire creative ideation process and the measurability. That is how we came at it. You need to capture the people trafficking through your retail environment; you need to develop the database. It’s not just about attracting traffic it’s about getting them into the store to buy and then follow up at the tail end by ultimately making that store the preference. That’s how one can develop a whole CRM strategy to seduce them into coming into your store.

     

    With the merger of FCB with Draft, you achieved what you yourself have said ‘is a balance of creativity and science, behavioral understanding and aspiration’. Now there is Initiative added to the mix. So now what? Globally how does this structure flow out?
    From a DraftFCB perspective, there are two parts of Initiative – Initiative handling all the traditional media and then there is IP Media which is a separate company which handles all the direct. We have been working with both of them for all of our clients, the only difference is that the planning was done in house on both sides of the equation. We already have the media strategists, we now have the breadth and depth of access to much more if we want to bring them into a team engagement.

    Over the last three weeks I have been on the road to every single region introducing them to the model, talking about the structure and meeting the four regional presidents who are experts in the their markets. It’s now up to them with their key executive stakeholders to develop a plan and come back with how they are going to do it.

     

    The general feeling is that the Indian boat is not about to see any changes so it will be business as usual out here. This is because Initiative in India is managed by Lintas Media Services, while creative agency Lowe is a 50:50 JV between IPG and Lintas. Now that there is a global realignment, what happens to the India story?
    (As stated by FCB Ulka managing director & CEO Anil Kapoor)

    Initiative in India is not the Initiative internationally, yet we are all still IPG companies. When a global decision is taken about a hundred different locations, different equations in different places need to be taken into consideration while each of the four presidents pertaining to his own geography will have to look country by country to determine what to unravel. Taking these things into account and the commitments involved over the next 3-6 months things will evolve. We cannot have a cookie cutter approach.

    Broadly speaking however, the mission has been announced. Thereafter, each country will have their own solutions. The balance sheet at the end of the day is that we are all IPG companies.

  • ‘The only thing that supercedes creativity is accountability’ : Laurence Boschetto

    ..continued from Page 1
     

    Relationships are built, they are time based and there are certain comfort levels and understanding that come into play, even in terms of intellect, which any endeavor will require. So how will this process be implemented?
    We are not talking about an immediate transformation, a transformation on that level requires a learning environment. Once a person develops a level of strategic mastery in that discipline then you cross them over.

     

    Some media pundits say that IPG’s new organizational structure is simply formalizing what has already been a well integrated media and brand agency alignment. Is that a correct assessment?
    I would change that a little and say that FCB was already that. The media strategy and planning at FCB sat in house, the buying however has been pulled out. They are one of the only agencies that maintained the media planning capability internally because they recognized that strategic planning required one to think holistically. The new thing that they are doing right now with Initiative, is that they are simply recognizing that there needs to be stronger alliances and that’s why they made the recent announcements.

     

    Can we say that IPG is now a media conglomerate operating two channel neutral agencies – DraftFCB and McCann World Group? From a global perspective what would be the ambit of the two arms of IPG? How would this prevent client conflict as both offer universal holistic solutions?
    Depending upon which client comes into which organization is contingent upon their sensibilities and psychology. McCann has a more traditional structure, it’s more of a mini holding company in which you have McCann, Momentum etc. which are all set up as individual organizations with their own management teams. Ours is one company, it’s one management team and thus it depends on the psychology of the client. Those that opt for a more traditional formula would flock to McCann, while those looking for something more holistic and integrated will come to us, the end result is that we both have the same palettes of skill sets but we offer them differently.

     
    The new thing that they are doing right now with Initiative, is that they are simply recognizing that there needs to be stronger alliances
     

    Interpublic Media was to be wound down by the end of October. Has that process been completed?
    Like anything in the context of a plan, the announcement they made in October whereby Initiative will be aligned with DraftFCB and Universal McCann to McCann World Group, that is the genesis of a plan, it’s the first articulation of where it’s going.

     

    Within this scheme it has been said that Magna will continue to negotiate on behalf of all Interpublic media clients. If that is the case why has the head of Magna moved to DraftFCB? Isn’t that indicative that Magna’s role is diminished?
    Magna is still going to stay the way it is and Bill Cella is going to continue to be actively involved. Essentially, Bill will also be involved in helping identify the future direction of the media offering within DraftFCB. Magna will still remain independent as will Initiative. Right now we overlap with Initiative yet there are places where their offering is very unique while Magna sits in the middle.

     

    A lot of this sounds like a vision statement. How does it work in a practical sense?
    The announcement is indeed an aspirational goal. Now what we need to do is understand the underpinnings of reality and how that connects to it. We also need to look at the clients and the organisational structure, including the people that will offer the disciplines on the media side and how it will work with a DraftFCB. All of that planning is still to unfold.