Cable TV
Cable confusion confounded – On the CAS Conundrum
The Indian cable industry goes through another churning. Revenue collections fall, defiant consumers get strident as CAS plods towards a deadline.
A clutch of 35-odd representatives of MSOs and cable operators are grinning from ear to ear. They have just returned after an all-expenses paid holiday to South Africa and having witnessed the thrilling India-Pakistan clash at the ongoing cricket World Cup. The host: Sony Entertainment Television India. Stated reason: relationship-building efforts.
Even as the conditional access implementation issue meanders towards the deadline of 14 July with some MSOs like Hathway and Siti Cable firming up plans for CAS, the relationship between broadcasters, MSOs and cable operators seem to have breached the ‘truce area’. The skirmishes are on the upswing again.
Cable and broadcast industry sources do chuckle that it may sound unkind, but extending sops to MSOs (multi-system operators) and cable operators by broadcasters, as the financial year is coming to a close end-March, is an attempt to give a fillip to falling subscription revenue collections.
A senior executive of Zee Telefilms’ cable arm Siti Cable, arguably the largest MSO in the country, grudgingly admitted, “Collection of subscription revenue from cable operators has fallen since January after the new rates of channels were made effective by broadcasters.”
This may certainly fly in the face of the assertions made by SET distribution head Shantonu Aditya that he was expecting distribution to bring in Rs 2.25 billion this fiscal. Aditya says that as of February-end the One Alliance had 6 million paying subscribers and was the number 1 distribution network as far as actual collections (as opposed to billings) were concerned.
Aditya may assert that his collections are going northward and everything is hunky-dory, but what can explain the ultimatum SET has given to the Hinduja group MSO INCableNet to pay outstandings of Rs 12.1 million that have piled up till 15 March 2003 or face disconnection of services? And, if this is the kind of resistance the World Cup network is facing, then for others the problems could have only been compounded.
And it is not as if it’s only the broadcasters that are having trouble getting money from the ground.
A Hathway executive explained, “A large number of cable ops are refusing to pay up according to new rates and we, in turn, are unable to pay increased amounts to broadcasters as is being demanded by them.”
Though Siti Cable will not admit it officially, industry sources indicate that Siti’s subscription revenue collection has fallen between 30-35 per cent in places like Delhi now compared to, say, December. In Delhi, till last year, India’s biggest MSO on an average used to collect subscription revenues around Rs 18.7 million per month. That was till 1 January, 2003 when the new increased rates of pay channels and various bouquets came into effect. After that, it’s been bad on the collection front for all concerned.
Points out a small cable operator in Delhi, “How can we pay the increased amount? The consumers are becoming more militant, refusing to pay up anything extra and daring us to cut their lines. We cannot absorb the cost and pay the MSO what it is demanding from us.”
Yes, as the cable scene in India undergoes another churning, with everybody in the industry and the government hoping that the churning may throw up the amrit or nectar (like it happened during the churning of the sea, as per Indian mythology) in the form of CAS, another dimension that has been added to the whole scenario is the consumer who has become aggro.
![]() |
These last few months have thrown up more and more cases of resident welfare associations at loggerheads with their local cable service providers over demands that the monthly subscription rates be hiked (to Rs 360 a month in some cases like in Vasant Kunj in Delhi).
As things stand today, it is not uncommon to see residents denied access to pay channels and making do with only FTA channels (again the example of Vasant Kunj comes to mind) as the service provider(s) is not willing to continue with the “free lunch” service to the subscribers.
The cable operators do have a problem. The average Indian cable subscriber is now showing his unwillingness to cough up the increased fees – at times the opposition takes physical form with violence erupting – despite being told that the rates of channels have been increased.
“I wanted to renew my contract with Star India as per last year’s rate, but the company would not agree and cut me off. After days of negotiations, I had no option, but to pay up and additional Rs 40,000-odd and get Star bouquet signals back,” said Viccki Chowdhry, an independent Delhi cable operator, servicing an upmarket residential area, and president of the National Cable & Telecom Association.
No wonder then that several court cases are being fought around the country between cable operators and broadcasters. Defiance seems to be the order of the day. May be the broadcasters had a case when they alleged that under-declaration by cable operators is so rampant that the former got less than a double digit share of the subscription money, in sharp contrast to global trends.
Meanwhile, as in the cricket World Cup, the twists and turns in the Indian cable industry too are numerous. Though MSOs are asserting that they are unable to firm up business plans for a post-CAS regime in the absence of maximum retail price of pay channels and also the basic tier of free to air channels, some of them are quietly doing just that.
Take the case of Rajan Raheja-controlled Hathway Cable and Datacom (Star holds 26 per cent stake in the company), for example. The company’s board has approved the rollout of digital CAS with an investment of around $30 m in the first phase, according to media reports.
“The cable TV network has decided to adopt the digital route as it is more secure. Broadcasters are wary of analogue systems as they can easily be hacked into and signals stolen”, Hathway’s chief executive K Jayaraman has been quoted in the media as saying.
Hathway expects to market 600,000 set top boxes in the first phase covering Mumbai, Delhi and Chennai. It has also short-listed eight vendors for the new conditional access technology including Motorola, Scientific Atlanta (which offer complete end-to-end package), a News Corp company NDS (for conditional access and SMS software) and France-based Canal Plus that offers CA solutions.
Siti Cable too has shortlisted three companies for various conditional access requirements, including Nagra, and the MSO expects to make an announcement soon on its alliance as also tie-up the hardware part of CAS too.
It seems MSOs are waiting to coincide their announcements with the next task force on CAS meet scheduled for later this month (21 March) where the price of the basic tier may become clearer.
Clearly, right down the cable distribution value chain there are problems of collections being faced, which is just the reason why CAS is being looked upon as the succour.
For that to happen, the government must lay out the regulatory ground rules for this process to go forward faster. And this means more than just warnings like the one information and broadcasting minister Ravi Shankar Prasad issued recently at a task force meet, saying that the government would not tolerate any delays in the implementation of CAS.
But muddying the waters and noble government intentions further are statements like the one that Consumer Guidance Society of India president Anant Patwardhan has been putting out. Patwardhan has put forth the specious argument that with the Convergence Communications Bill around the corner (?), there is no need for instituting CAS at all.
It all makes for a perfect recipe for chaos and confusion. It’s quite possible a battle for control of the local fiefdoms will commence under CAS with cable ops encroaching on each others’ turf in order to sign on more customers with the lure of lower pricing and better service. Hopefully, there will be fewer blood baths than were there earlier with some cable ops being hacked or gunned to death.
($ 1 = Rs 47.66)!
Cable TV
Den Networks Q3 profit steady despite revenue pressure
MUMBAI: When margins wobble, liquidity talks and in Q3 FY25-26, cash did most of the talking. Den Networks Limited closed the December quarter with consolidated revenue of Rs.251 crore, marginally higher than the previous quarter but down 4 per cent year-on-year, even as profitability stayed resilient on the back of strong cash reserves and disciplined cost control.
Subscription income softened to Rs.98 crore, slipping 3 per cent sequentially and 14 per cent from last year, while placement and marketing income offered some cheer, rising 15 per cent quarter-on-quarter to Rs.148 crore. Total costs climbed faster than revenue, up 7 per cent QoQ to Rs.238 crore, driven largely by higher content costs and operating expenses. As a result, EBITDA dropped sharply to Rs.13 crore from Rs.19 crore in Q2 and Rs.28 crore a year ago, pulling margins down to 5 per cent.
Yet, the bottom line refused to blink. Profit after tax stood at Rs.40 crore, up 15 per cent sequentially and only marginally lower than last year’s Rs.42 crore. A healthy Rs.57 crore in other income helped cushion operating pressure, keeping profit before tax at Rs.48 crore, broadly stable quarter-on-quarter despite the tougher cost environment.
The real headline-grabber, however, sits on the balance sheet. The company remains debt-free, with cash and cash equivalents swelling to Rs.3,279 crore as of December 31, 2025. Net worth rose to Rs.3,748 crore, while online collections accounted for 97 per cent of total receipts, underscoring strong cash discipline across operations, including subsidiaries.
In short, while Q3 showed signs of operating strain, the financial backbone remains solid. With zero gross debt, steady profits and a formidable cash war chest, the company enters the next quarter with flexibility firmly on its side proving that in uncertain markets, balance sheet strength can be the best growth strategy.
Cable TV
Plugging along as Hathway tunes in steady profits this quarter
MUMBAI: In a quarter where staying connected mattered more than moving fast, Hathway Cable and Datacom kept its signal steady. The cable and broadband major reported a net profit of Rs 21.7 crore for the December 2025 quarter, marking a clear improvement from Rs 13.6 crore a year earlier, even as pressures persisted in parts of its operating portfolio.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2025, revenue from operations stood largely flat at Rs 536.6 crore, compared with Rs 511.2 crore in the same period last year. Including other income of Rs 21.1 crore, total income rose to Rs 557.7 crore, reflecting incremental gains despite a competitive media and connectivity landscape.
Profitability improved on the back of disciplined cost control and higher contribution from associates. Profit before tax increased to Rs 28.2 crore, up from Rs 19.1 crore in Q3 FY25, aided by Rs 3.9 crore in share of profit from associates and joint ventures. After tax, earnings for the quarter climbed nearly 60 per cent year-on-year.
Over the nine months ended December 31, 2025, Hathway reported a net profit of Rs 71 crore, compared with Rs 57.7 crore in the corresponding period last year. Total income for the nine months came in at Rs 1,677.3 crore, up from Rs 1,599.8 crore, while profit before tax rose to Rs 94.7 crore from Rs 84.2 crore.
A closer look at the segments shows a familiar split story. The cable television business remained under pressure, reporting a segment loss of Rs 11.4 crore for the quarter, though this narrowed sharply from the Rs 16.6 crore loss seen a year ago. In contrast, the broadband business returned to the black, delivering a modest but positive contribution of Rs 4.2 crore, helped by associate income. Dealing in securities continued to be a bright spot, generating Rs 14.7 crore in quarterly profits.
Costs stayed broadly contained. Pay channel costs, the single largest expense, rose to Rs 287.4 crore, while depreciation and amortisation stood at Rs 74 crore. Finance costs remained negligible at Rs 0.2 crore, keeping leverage risks in check.
Hathway’s earnings per share for the quarter improved to Rs 0.12, up from Rs 0.08 a year ago. The company maintained a strong balance sheet, with total assets of Rs 5,302.4 crore and total liabilities of Rs 848.9 crore as of December 31, 2025.
While structural challenges persist in the traditional cable business, the numbers suggest Hathway is slowly recalibrating its mix trimming losses where needed, leaning on associate income, and keeping the broadband engine ticking. For now, the company may not be racing ahead, but it is clearly staying tuned in to profitability.
Cable TV
Signal drop Tejas Networks’ numbers stay patchy in a volatile quarter
MUMBAI: In telecom, even the strongest signals face interference and Tejas Networks Limited’s latest numbers show just how noisy the airwaves remain. The Tata Group-backed networking firm reported unaudited standalone revenue of Rs 305.72 crore for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, up sequentially from Rs 261.37 crore in the September quarter, but sharply lower compared with the Rs 2,642.05 crore clocked in the year-ago period. The topline recovery, however, was overshadowed by a pre-tax loss of Rs 303.20 crore, widening from a Rs 473.03 crore loss in the previous quarter, and reversing a Rs 211.06 crore profit reported in the December 2024 quarter.
After tax, the company posted a loss of Rs 196.89 crore for Q3 FY26, compared with a loss of Rs 307.17 crore in Q2 FY26 and a profit of Rs 165.42 crore a year earlier. For the nine months ended December 31, 2025, Tejas Networks reported revenue of Rs 769.02 crore and a loss after tax of Rs 697.97 crore, a sharp swing from a Rs 512.67 crore profit in the corresponding nine-month period last year. The numbers reflect a year marked by execution challenges rather than demand collapse.
Costs remained the dominant spoiler. Total expenses for the December quarter stood at Rs 616.50 crore, driven by elevated material costs, employee expenses and provisioning. The company also flagged several one-offs and adjustments: a Rs 9.85 crore provision linked to the implementation of new labour codes, ₹24.35 crore in warranty provisions, and reversals related to inventory obsolescence. Earlier quarters had already absorbed heavy charges tied to contract manufacturing losses, design changes and write-downs, the hangover from which continues to weigh on profitability.
Tejas reiterated that it operates as a single reportable segment focused on telecom and data networking products and services, offering little insulation from sector-wide volatility. While revenue momentum has stabilised sequentially, the contrast with the previous financial year remains stark. For context, the company closed FY25 with audited standalone revenue of Rs 8,915.73 crore and a profit after tax of Rs 450.66 crore, underscoring how sharply the operating environment has shifted in FY26.
The results were reviewed by the audit committee and approved by the board on January 9, 2026, but they leave investors with a familiar question: when does recovery turn structural rather than episodic? For now, Tejas Networks appears to be in reset mode, balancing execution clean-up with cost discipline. In a sector where margins can be as fragile as fibre strands, the next few quarters will matter as much as the signals the company sends to the market.
-
e-commerce1 month agoSwiggy Instamart’s GOV surges 103 per cent year on year to Rs 7,938 crore
-
iWorld1 year agoKuku TV transforms India’s OTT space with vertical microdrama boom
-
News Headline1 year agoTRAI puts a ‘stop’ to unsolicited calls and messages
-
News Headline2 months agoFrom selfies to big bucks, India’s influencer economy explodes in 2025
-
Comedy2 years agoTaarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah celebrates 4,000 episodes
-
MAM2 years agoOpenAI joins C2PA steering committee
-
News Headline1 year agoAbhishek Bachchan joins as co-owner of European T20 Premier League
-
News Headline2 years agoOdisha to host Ultimate Kho Kho Season 2 from December 24





