MAM
Are we ready for vocal for local?
NEW DELHI: As the country transitioned into the fourth phase of Covid2019 lockdown, prime minister Narendra Modi in his effervescently charming manner stood on the national podium asking citizens to go “Vocal for Local” for building an “Aatmnirbhar Bharat” (self-reliant India), on 12 May. He also announced a stimulus package of Rs 20 lakh crores for the economy to realise this aspiration.
Following his address, union minister of finance Nirmala Sitharaman spelt out a list of reforms and reliefs, utilising the huge stimulus package, including a change in the definition of MSMEs, the introduction of collateral-free loans for the sector, injection of liquidity in DISCOMs, and liquidity support for farmers.
As expected, social media was abuzz with posts supporting the call for using local products, some also sharing a detailed list of global vs ‘swadeshi’ FMCG products.
Praising this move of the government, chartered accountant and AnBac Advisors founder Anuj Bali told Indiantelevision.com, “This is a great initiative taken by the Indian government as it is going to help us in building a stronger economy and also positively balance our imports with exports.”
He added that the way the prime minister has approached the public with the idea is also a great stimulator. “He has presented it like he had come up with the Swacch Bharat Abhiyan, motivating people to start living the movement.”
However, while the idea of going local and creating a self-reliant India has appealed greatly to the masses and industrialists, there are some structural issues, which the governments will have to address.
DigitalKites SVP Amil Lall says, “Going local helps any economy to grow but first we need to check if we are ready for it. For example, if we talk of mobile manufacturers or automobile manufacturers in India, we will still have to import the spare parts, as such facilities are far from realisation here. Brands like Lava, while being Indian, have their research and development departments based in China.”
Bali shared similar views as he said, “Yes, the government needs to intervene at core levels, apart from introducing financial stimulus. There are a lot of bureaucratic issues as well when it comes to acquiring land for businesses and setting up factories, which needs to be addressed.
He added, “We also need some intervention in the education sector to develop research appetite in our students.”
Economic experts noted that it is not very feasible to achieve this target of going completely local, given the current status of India.
Retired professor Satish K Jain, who has served institutions like JNU, shared, “It is a good idea but I think we are not really prepared it (using only local brands). You need to have proper infrastructure, rules and regulations should be easy, bureaucracy should be efficient, and there should be enough local expertise in place, all of which is lacking right now. Our infrastructure also is not developed to achieve this.”
TERI School of Advanced Studies vice-chancellor (Actg) Manipadma Datta said, “India is facing a demand-side crisis right now, but with this, we are making it look like a supply-side challenge. Even before the lockdown, we saw how automobile manufacturers were struggling as there was no demand. In addition to this, our manufacturing index and agricultural index has been falling rapidly.”
He added that another problem facing the Indian business sector right now is the unorganised labour class, which comprises 24 per cent of the workforce. “They have had a very traumatic experience because of Covid2019 and it will take time for them to get over it.”
Both Datta and Bali noted that the economy will grow only when all people have money in their hands and the government needs to address the liquidity issues for the consumers as well.
All of them agreed that a rework on labour laws, already in process, simplification of bureaucratic processes, and investment in research & development facilities are needed to achieve this goal, and that seems like an extension of ‘Make In India’ mission.
However, Datta left us with a question around how feasible and sensible is it to make a local economy in a highly globalised world. “Look at Singapore. That is a very small nation, doesn’t have enough land to put factories and relies on international facilities. Yet, it is one of the most advanced regions, not just in Asia, but globally. So, why do we really need a local approach to be self-reliant?”
Brands
Netflix India names Rekha Rane director of films and series marketing
Streaming giant bets on a seasoned marketer who helped build Amazon and Netflix into household names
MUMBAI: Netflix has put a proven brand builder at the helm of its films and series marketing in India, naming Rekha Rane as director in a move that signals sharper focus on audience growth and cultural cut-through in one of its most hotly contested markets.
Rane steps into the role after seven years at Netflix, where she has quietly shaped how the platform sells stories to India. Her latest promotion, effective February 2026, crowns a run that spans brand, slate and product marketing across originals, licensed content and new verticals such as games.
A strategic marketing and communications professional with roughly 15 years’ experience, Rane has spent much of her career building technology-led consumer businesses and new categories, notably e-commerce and subscription video on demand. She was part of the early push that introduced Amazon.in, Prime Video and Netflix to Indian homes, then helped turn them into everyday brands.
At Netflix, she most recently served as head of brand and slate marketing for India from March 2024 to February 2026, leading teams across media and marketing for global and local content portfolios. Before that, as manager for original films and series marketing, she led IP creation and go-to-market strategy for titles including Guns and Gulaabs, Kaala Paani, The Railway Men* and The Great Indian Kapil Show, spanning both binge and weekly-release formats.
Her earlier Netflix roles covered product discovery and promotion in India and integrated campaign strategy to drive conversations around the content slate, product awareness and brand-equity metrics.
Before Netflix, Rane logged more than three years at Amazon in brand marketing roles in Bengaluru. There she handled national and regional campaigns for Amazon.in, worked on customer assistance programmes in growth geographies and contributed to the go-to-market strategy for the launch of Prime Video India.
Her career began well away from streaming. At Reliance Brands in Mumbai, she worked on retail marketing for Diesel and Superdry. A stint at Leo Burnett saw her work on primary research for P&G Tide, mapping Indian shoppers’ paths to purchase. Earlier still, at Orange in the United Kingdom, she rose from sales assistant to store manager, running a team and owning monthly P&L for a retail outlet.
The arc is telling. As global streamers fight for attention in a crowded Indian market, executives who understand both mass retail behaviour and digital habit-building are prized. Rane’s career sits at that intersection.
For Netflix, the bet is simple: in a market spoilt for choice, sharp marketing can still tilt the screen. And with Rane now leading the charge, the streamer is signalling it wants not just viewers, but fandom.
Brands
Orient Beverages pops the fizz with steady Q3 gains and rising profits
Kolkata-based beverage maker reports stronger revenues and profits for December quarter.
MUMBAI: A fizzy quarter with a steady aftertaste that’s how Orient Beverages Limited, the company that manufactures and distributes packaged drinking water under the brand name Bisleri closed the December 2025 period, as the Kolkata-based drinks maker reported improved revenues and a healthy rise in profits, signalling operational stability in a competitive beverage market.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2025, Orient Beverages posted standalone revenue from operations of Rs 39.98 crore, up from Rs 36.42 crore in the previous quarter and Rs 33.53 crore in the same quarter last year. Total income for the quarter stood at Rs 42.24 crore, reflecting consistent demand and stable pricing across its beverage portfolio.
Profit before tax for the quarter came in at Rs 3.47 crore, a sharp improvement from Rs 1.31 crore in the September quarter and Rs 0.39 crore a year ago. After accounting for tax expenses of Rs 0.79 crore, the company reported a net profit of Rs 2.68 crore, nearly three times the Rs 0.99 crore recorded in the preceding quarter.
On a nine-month basis, the momentum remained intact. Revenue from operations for the period ended December 31, 2025 rose to Rs 117.66 crore, compared with Rs 106.95 crore in the corresponding period last year. Net profit for the nine months climbed to Rs 5.51 crore, more than double the Rs 2.18 crore reported in the same period of the previous financial year.
The consolidated numbers told a similar story. For the December quarter, consolidated revenue from operations stood at Rs 45.06 crore, while profit after tax came in at Rs 2.06 crore. For the nine-month period, consolidated revenue touched Rs 133.57 crore, with net profit of Rs 4.49 crore, underscoring the group’s improving profitability trajectory.
Operating expenses remained largely controlled, with cost of materials, employee benefits and other expenses broadly aligned with revenue growth. The company continued to operate within a single reportable segment beverages simplifying its cost structure and reporting framework.
The unaudited financial results were reviewed by the Audit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors at its meeting held on 7 February 2026. Statutory auditors carried out a limited review and reported no material misstatements in the results.
In a market where margins are often squeezed by input costs and competition, Orient Beverages’ latest numbers suggest the company has found a reliable rhythm not explosive, but steady enough to keep the fizz alive.
MAM
Washington Post CEO exits abruptly after newsroom cuts spark backlash
Leadership change follows layoffs, protests and a bruising battle over trust.
MUMBAI: When the presses are rolling but patience runs out, even the editor’s chair isn’t safe. The Washington Post announced on Saturday that its chief executive and publisher Will Lewis is stepping down with immediate effect, bringing a sudden end to a turbulent two-year tenure marked by financial strain, newsroom unrest and public backlash.
Lewis’s exit comes just days after the Bezos-owned newspaper announced sweeping job cuts that triggered protests outside its Washington headquarters and a wave of anger from readers and staff. While newspapers across the US are grappling with shrinking revenues and digital disruption, Lewis’s leadership had increasingly come under fire for how those pressures were handled.
The Post confirmed that Jeff D’Onofrio, a former Tumblr CEO who joined the organisation last year as chief financial officer, has taken over as CEO and publisher, effective immediately. In an email to staff, later shared by reporters on social media, Lewis said it was “the right time for me to step aside.”
The leadership change follows the announcement of large-scale redundancies earlier this week. While the Post did not officially confirm numbers, The New York Times reported that around 300 of the paper’s roughly 800 journalists were laid off. Entire teams were dismantled, including the Post’s Middle East bureau and its Kyiv-based correspondent covering the war in Ukraine.
Sports, graphics and local reporting were sharply reduced, and the paper’s daily podcast, Post Reports, was suspended. On Thursday, hundreds of journalists and supporters gathered outside the Post’s downtown office in protest, calling the cuts a blow to public-interest journalism.
Former executive editor Marty Baron described the moment as “among the darkest days in the history of one of the world’s greatest news organisations.”
Lewis defended his record in his farewell note, saying “difficult decisions” were taken to secure the paper’s long-term future and protect its ability to publish “high-quality nonpartisan news”. But his tenure coincided with growing scrutiny of editorial independence at the Post.
Owner Jeff Bezos faced criticism for reining in the paper’s traditionally liberal editorial page and blocking an endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris ahead of the 2024 US election. The move was widely seen as breaking the long-standing firewall between ownership and editorial decision-making.
According to a Wall Street Journal report, around 250,000 digital subscribers cancelled their subscriptions after the paper declined to endorse Harris. The Post reportedly lost about $100 million in 2024 as advertising and subscription revenues slid.
While the wider newspaper industry continues to battle declining print advertising and the pull of social media, some national titles have stabilised. Rivals such as The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times have managed to build sustainable digital businesses, a turnaround that has so far eluded the Post despite its billionaire backing.
As Jeff D’Onofrio steps into the role, the challenge is stark, restore confidence inside the newsroom, win back readers who walked away, and prove that one of America’s most storied newspapers can still find its footing in a brutally competitive media landscape.
-
News Broadcasting1 week agoMukesh Ambani, Larry Fink come together for CNBC-TV18 exclusive
-
News Headline1 month agoFrom selfies to big bucks, India’s influencer economy explodes in 2025
-
iWorld5 months agoBillions still offline despite mobile internet surge: GSMA
-
Applications2 months ago28 per cent of divorced daters in India are open to remarriage: Rebounce
-
iWorld2 weeks agoNetflix celebrates a decade in India with Shah Rukh Khan-narrated tribute film
-
Hollywood6 days agoThe man who dubbed Harry Potter for the world is stunned by Mumbai traffic
-
News Headline2 months agoGame on again as 2025 powers up a record year and sets the stage for 2030
-
I&B Ministry3 months agoIndia steps up fight against digital piracy


